Tag: Anyim Pius Anyim

  • I thought story of your death was another fake news, Ex-Senate President Anyim mourns late Sen Gbenga Aluko

    I thought story of your death was another fake news, Ex-Senate President Anyim mourns late Sen Gbenga Aluko

    Former Senate President, Senator Anyim Pius Anyim in a tribute on his former colleague, Senator Gbenga Aluko said he thought the news on his passage was another fake news.

    Anyim in a tribute personally signed by him described Senator Aluko as a trusted and reliable ally with friendly disposition while they served Nigeria in the Fourth Senate as young legislators.

    In the eight paragraph tribute, the ex-SGF went memory lane narrating how Aluko was the most active on technology and his vibrancy was very visible.

    Read full tribute below:

    TRIBUTE TO A FRIEND, A COLLEAGUE AND A GENTLEMAN:
    DISTINGUISHED SENATOR GBENGA ALUKO
    We came to the Senate amongst the youngest, you were the most active on
    technology of all of us and so became the frontline driver of all the Senate
    activities.

    You were vibrant, intelligent and of great friendly disposition.
    You were not only my colleague but my friend and ally. When we left the Senate,
    I had an occasion to write a referral for you and I took time to pour out my
    heart on who you are.

    You were full of life, youthful and agile in all your manners. I am coming to
    accept the reality that it could be true that you are no more. The news appeared fake as it was not believable. I mustered the courage to write this tribute because it appears that preparations for your final rite of passage have become
    inescapable.

    Just a week before your demise, we spoke on how to meet in Lagos for my Zik Prize Award Ceremony. When you did not turn up, I thought some other
    important engagements held you up. The next I heard was your sudden demise.

    Only God knows why this should be and we cannot question God.
    Let me use this opportunity to convey my deepest condolences to your
    immediate family, the 4th Senate, the people and Government of Ekiti State and indeed Nigeria. I am inclined to state that your sudden demise is a national loss and indeed a personal loss to me.

    My brother, as you set out on the journey back to your maker, may the Almighty
    God receive your soul in His bosom.
    Adieu my friend and brother
    my
    Anyim, Pius Anyim, GCON.

  • 2023: How Southeast can clinch presidency – Anyim, Ezeife

    2023: How Southeast can clinch presidency – Anyim, Ezeife

    Chukwuemeka Ezeife, a former governor of Anambra, and former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Anyim Pius Anyim, as well as others have advised the Southeast region to persuade other regions to support them to clinch the presidency in 2023.

    They said this on Saturday at the United For Better Nigeria Initiative (UBNI) National Convention in Abuja.

    Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Anyim Pius Anyim, said that it is neither a right nor was it legal for the southeast to demand presidency.

    Anyim said that they had to persuade other regions to support their dream if they would produce a president in 2023.

    “Is it right for the Southeast to produce the next president?, my answer is legally no, and the reason is that the constitution is clear, the constitution says every Nigerian of 40 years is entitled to aspire for that office.

    “On the other side, morally is it right? is it an entitlement? I will say yes because the federal character principle enshrined in the constitution encourages rotation.

    “The reason I have to make this clarification is that when the right you have is not legal, the only approach and the instrument you have is persuasion.

    “So the approach, the language will be to persuade others to see reason with you that morally they should support you to take a turn since it rotates.”

    Anyim therefore encouraged the Southeast that as they go ahead with the movement of advocating for a president, it should be with an altitude persuasion.

    According to Ezeife, the kind of Nigeria God wanted when He created Nigeria was for her to develop into a super power among nations, and raise respect and dignity for all blacks on earth.

    He said that one of the ways to achieve the feats the nation wanted was to carry everybody along without discrimination.

    “So I found Hausa, Yoruba, Igbo and other groups in this place talking about the need for federal character. If you do it that way, there will be unity, if there is fairness, equity, justice, you will have unity and progress.

    “In the absence of those, you see where we are now. It is not a matter of give us president, we don’t give, you have to work for it, the Igbo does not prostrate.

    “The Igbo man does not keel down but this time, we are prepared to kneel down to every part of Nigeria, every group, every ethnic group in Nigeria, we are prepared to even prostrate because we believe in this country.”

    Ezeife said that Igbo people had contributed greatly to the development of Nigeria in terms of infrastructure, intellect and business.

    He therefore said that it was time to give Igbo people the chance to build Nigeria to the standard God wanted it.

    Mrs Nkolika Mkparu ,Coordinator-General, UBNI, said that there was a feeling of political marginalisation after over a century (by 2023) the Southeast region is yet to produce a president.

    Mkparu said that UBNI, a non-partisan political advocacy group, which had been involved in enlightenment for a united Nigeria deemed it fit to beam searchlight on the issue.

    She said that in achieving this political balance, the support from the Southeast region alone would not suffice, therefore there is the need to appeal to other regions to support it.

    “The truth of the matter is that our strongest strengths are from the north, our great leaders are from the north, so we are working with the whole nation with the understanding that inclusiveness is what will lead Nigeria to a better future.

    “Inclusiveness that will bring us together in one union is what will bring our country together.

    “Nigeria is huge enough for everybody, Nigeria has the capacity to hold everybody, Nigeria has the intellectuals, Nigeria has all it takes to lift the county, all we are asking for is to give the southeast also a chance to lead.

    “All the other parts have tried, south south has tried, north has tried, west has tried since over 50 years now, so we are hoping that we should be allowed to try.”

    The Guest Speaker, Prof. Mutiullahi Olasupo, who is the Director of Institute for Peace Leadership and Development Studies, University of Abuja, said that it was right for the southeast to produce the next president in the interest of peace and natural law of justice.

    He said it was imperative for all Nigerians to exclusively resolve that the presidency in 2023 should go to the southeast.

    He said that the same mechanism that produced former President Olusegun Obasanjo in 1999, should also repeat itself by 2023, to produce a president from the south east.

    “Out of all the six geo-political zones in this country, it is only the southeast that has not produced the president in this country.

    “Does that mean that the south east is not being recognized as a geopolitical zone in Nigeria?” he asked.

  • See what happened when  Ex-SGF, Anyim Pius Anyim took Presidential ambition to Babangida, Abdulsalam [Photos]

    See what happened when Ex-SGF, Anyim Pius Anyim took Presidential ambition to Babangida, Abdulsalam [Photos]

    Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation Anyim Pius Anyim, has consulted with elder statesmen and former heads of state, General Ibrahim Babangida (rtd) and General Abdulsalami Abubakar (rtd) over his 2023 presidential ambition.

    Anyim was in Minna, the Niger State capital, home of the two former leaders where he held meetings with them as he intensifies effort to win support for his power bid under the platform of the People’s Democratic Party(PDP).

    The former Senate President disclosed that he visited both leaders on December 2, to inform them of his decision to contest for president in 2023 presidency, and to seek their blessings, in a post on his verified Facebook Page.

    “Today, I was received in a private audience by two of our nation’s esteemed leaders and patriots. I met with former President Ibrahim Babangida and former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubarkar,” he wrote.

    “I consulted with them on my intention to contest for the presidency of our beloved country. Both leaders are rich in vision and deep in grasp of our history. They were generous with their wise counsels.

    “I am further emboldened in the conviction that I can make significant contributions in our collective quest to consolidate democracy, build a stronger and more united Nigeria.

    “I feel very enriched and invigorated. Long live Nigeria.”

    Anyim Babangida Abdulsalami3
    Abdulsalami Abubakar and Anyim Pius Anyim

    Anyim had on October 30, declared his intention to run for president whether the party zones the ticket to the South-East or not.

    According to Anyim, “Posters of my presidential bid and agitations by groups for me to contest flooded the social media in 2020 and I disassociated myself from such calls

    “I felt that it was too early for such declarations to enable the present administration to concentrate on governance.

    “Such calls resurfaced in the early part of 2021 and I chose to be quiet over the issue. We presently have less than 18 months to the next elections and I feel the time was ripe to indicate my interest.”

  • EFCC grills ex-SGF over alleged diversion of N780m public fund

    EFCC grills ex-SGF over alleged diversion of N780m public fund

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), yesterday, commenced interrogation of a former Senate President, Anyim Pius Anyim, in a case of alleged corruption and diversion of public funds.

    According to reports, Anyim arrived at the headquarters of the anti-graft agency in Jabi, Abuja, at about 3:00 p.m. and was grilled by a team of operatives.

    Details of the specific allegations against the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation were sketchy as of press time.

    However, a source familiar with the case it was tied to the corruption and money laundering case involving former Aviation Minister and serving senator, Stella Oduah.

    Rehabilitation funds worth N780 million were allegedly traced to a company in which Anyim has an interest.

    Meanwhile, spokesman of the anti-graft agency, Wilson Uwujaren is yet to formally confirm the development.

  • JUST IN: David Mark, Anyim Pius Anyim, 25 other PDP elders wade into party crisis, call for calm

    JUST IN: David Mark, Anyim Pius Anyim, 25 other PDP elders wade into party crisis, call for calm

    A former Senate President David Mark and 27 other elders have made known their intentions to wade in the crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    They said they will soon meet with PDP Governors, the Board of Trustees, and the National Working Committee (NWC) to find lasting solutions to the fundamental matters arising.

    But they have appealed to all party organs, officers, and members to remain calm.

    The 28 elders made the plea in a statement which they jointly signed in Abuja.

    The elders are Mark, ex-Senate Presidents Anyim Pius Anyim and Adolphus Wabara; former Deputy Senate President Ibrahim Mantu; former Deputy Speaker Austin Opara; ex-Minister Jerry Gana; ex-Governors Sule Lamido, Ibrahim Danmkwambo, and Olagunsoye Oyinlola; ex-National Chairman, Okwesilieze Nwodo; ex-Ministers Odion Ugbesa and Hajiya Zainab Maina, Senators Biodun Olujimi and Zainab Kure.

    Others are a former National Chairman of PDP Sen. Ahmed Makarfi; a former Chief of Staff Mike Ogiadomhe; Senate Minority Leader Eyinnaya Abaribe; Sen. Helen Esuene; Sen. Agboola Hosea and Hajiya Adiza Adodo.

    The statement said: “In view of recent developments at the National Secretariat of our great party, we have resolved to issue this press statement urging all party organs, party officers and party members to remain calm, faithful and orderly, as we proceed with urgent consultations and initiatives to resolve the contending issues.

    “We wish to firmly reassure aggrieved stakeholders that we intend to be thorough, objective, creative, and balanced in our efforts to find lasting solutions to the fundamental matters arising.

    ” Towards this end, we have initiated moves to urgently meet with our Governors, the Board of Trustees, the National Working Committee, and other critical stakeholders. Since we all share the legitimate desires of our loyal members to offer a credible, effective and productive alternative, we have no doubt that we shall soon find positive, appropriate, pragmatic, and lasting solutions to the problems facing the party.

    “We shall emerge from this crisis stronger, better, and more united. This is only a temporary challenge.”

    The elders assured the PDP will overcome its challenges and provide leadership qualities for Nigerians.

    The statement added: “We assure all Nigerians that the Peoples Democratic Party is resolute in providing qualitative leadership, sound programs, effective implementation strategies, and hope generating solutions to our national problems.

    ” On behalf of the elders and founding fathers of the Peoples Democratic Party, we wish to use this medium to thank all Party Members and supporters across Nigeria and in diaspora for their commitment, loyalty and strong support.”

  • Nigeria yet to learn from civil war experience – Ex-SGF Anyim Pius Anyim

    Nigeria yet to learn from civil war experience – Ex-SGF Anyim Pius Anyim

    Former Senate President Anyim Pius Anyim has advocated a memorial arcade for a detailed and factual account of the Nigerian Civil War.

    The arcade, according to him, will help upcoming generations to appreciate the scale and extent of the war.

    He regretted that the country is yet to properly situate the lessons of the civil war in its history 51 years after.

    Anyim spoke at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka the Anambra State capital where he delivered a keynote address during an International Research Conference on 50 Years Post-Nigeria Civil War on Tuesday.

    The event which was organised by The Centre for Health and Allied Legal and Demographical Development Research and Training (CHALADORAT) had Nnia Nwodo; Bishop of Sokoto Catholic Diocese, Most Rev. Matthew Hassan Kukah, Ambassador Bianca Ojukwu as well as Professors Uzodimma Nwala and Akachukwu Ezigbo, in attendance.

    The former Senate President explained that the memorial arcade would not only provide soothing effect but highlight war as a national tragedy that must never be contemplated.

    Recommending the Rwandan experience under the leadership of President Paul Kagame, Anyim argued that nobody would have any reason to talk about honouring victims of civil war if memorial arcades were properly laid out.

    His words: “51 years after the Nigerian Civil War, Nigeria was yet to properly situate the issues and lessons of that experience in our nation’s history. As at today, it appears there’s neither an official record nor memorial of the war.

    “We need a detailed and factual account of the war in a sequence of events, social and economic costs, number of lives lost, details of the victims, among others.

    “Such an account will help the upcoming generations to appreciate the scale and the extent of the unfortunate event.

    “The resource materials and the outcomes of this conference should bridge the gap and service to ward off any reckless desire for war as its dangers will be glaring.”

    Anyim, who is also a former Secretary to Government of the Federation(SGF), lamented the growing disposition of political leaders to be above the law. The behaviour, he argued, had caused a reverse growth of the nation’s democracy.

    “The ‘above the law’ executive political leaders attitudes need to be evaluated with a view to measuring its effect on the desire of aspirants to political offices, particularly with the attendant rise in corruption and nepotism,” he said.

    Also, Nwodo, the immediate past President of Ohanaeze Ndigbo regretted that the groups that fought the war were still in control of the nation’s leadership. He accused them of fuelling further crisis through their utterances.

    He said: “We have for too long allowed the bitterness of the war and its lingering feelings to dictate our political relationships. The young men and women who were not part of the war are frustrated by the impasse.

    “We do not want any more wars. We have shed enough blood without producing corresponding political results. 50 years after Biafra the time is now overripe for a fresh approach, including discussions and fruitful negotiations,” he said.

    Earlier, Vice-Chancellor of UNIZIK, Prof. Charles Esimone, expressed optimism that the conference would bring about useful ideas and recommendations towards building an enduring peace in the country.

  • Continued existence of Nigeria building up to dangerous time bomb, Anyim Pius Anyim tells Buhari in open letter

    Continued existence of Nigeria building up to dangerous time bomb, Anyim Pius Anyim tells Buhari in open letter

    Former President of the Senate, Anyim Pius Anyim has expressed his concerns over the recent security challenges in the country in an open letter to President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Pius who doubles as former Secretary to the Government of the Federation in the letter said the continued existence of Nigeria as an entity is daily threatened and has now gotten to a dangerous stage requiring urgent attention particularly from the president as the Commander-in-Chief.

    He enthused that the challenges are surmountable if the president can raise to the occasion by creating a plaftorm to hear Nigerians out.

    Read full letter below as obtained exclusively by TheNewsGuru.com, TNG.

    ANYIM PIUS ANYIM LLB, LLM

    3rd May, 2021

    Mohammedu Buhari, GCFR
    President
    Federal.Republic of Nigeria
    Aso Villa
    Abuja

    OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT MOHAMMADU BUHARI.
    RE: THE STATE OF INSECURITY IN THE NATION:

    MY SUGGESTION

    Mr. President, you may recall that on the 5th of October, 2018, I had audience with you in your office. In that meeting, with your then Chief of Staff, the late Mallam Abba Kyari, in attendance, we touched on a number of issues including the insecurity in the country and about which you directed that I should do a short brief on my suggestion and forward to your Chief of Staff.

    Mr. President may wish to know that I did as you directed and submitted my suggestion to your then Chief of Staff on the 20th of October, 2018.

    I have decided to do this open letter just to be sure that it will get to you, because I suspect that the private one did not get to you. Most importantly, I would not have bothered to write you this letter if the unfortunate and avoidable circumstances we have found ourselves in, as a nation, have not continued to fester to the magnitude of threatening the fabric of the nation. This letter, therefore, is to reconvey my earlier suggestion which, I want to believe, did not get to you.

    PREAMBLE

    The perilous threats to our national sovereignty at the time you took over the reigns of power in 2015 were the Boko Haram insurgence in the North East; the armed agitation in the Niger Delta Region, and the IPOB agitation in the South East. Mr. President, on your assumption of office the most striking promise you made to the nation was to tackle insecurity with emphasis on reclaiming the territories occupied by Boko Haram. I must admit that you did approach the insecurity challenge with commendable determination but unfortunately, the challenge, with time, became hydra headed and no doubt went beyond your control.

    Before I proceed with my suggestion, may I first put in perspective the basis of the position I will canvass in this letter.

    I wish to note that every violent agitation originates from a non-violent agitation that was not attended to. Today, Nigeria is bedeviled with violent and non-violent agitations. It is also a fact that the current violent agitations originated from non-violent agitations e.g., Boko Haram started as a non-violent procession; the herders/farmers clashes which has degenerated into a deadly conflict with many states now bloody theaters of war; ethnic conflicts in Kaduna, Ebonyi, Cross River, Benue, Plateau states etc. which are escalating to an unmanageable scale; Armed Banditry in virtually all states of the federation particularly Zamfara, Katsina, Kaduna, Niger, Sokoto which has overwhelmed the Law enforcement agencies, kidnapping which has become occupational in most parts of the country.

    To worsen matters, Boko Haram, has acquired new impetus that they now overrun the military and have even expanded their base to Niger State. IPOB has become a regional challenge. On the non-violent side, agitations for restructuring are scaling up in
    momentum, ethnic consciousness and allegiance even among the elite are far eroding national concerns. All these and many more coupled with gross downturn in the national economic, social and political space has become an apparent threat to our nationhood.

    I am to add, that it must be known that military actions or even foreign help alone cannot bring permanent solutions to ethnic conflicts or nationality agitations. Mr. President, you need to create a platform to hear Nigerians out.

    MY SUGGESTION

    THE SEARCH FOR SOLUTION MUST INVOLVE THE CITIZENS

    In the build-up to securing the Nigerian Independence, the Colonial Administration were confronted with reservations by minority tribes in the three regions of Northern, Eastern and Western Nigeria about fears of domination by the majority tribes. In other to find a lasting solution, the Colonial Administration appointed a commission to “ENQUIRE INTO THE FEARS OF MINORITIES AND MEANS OF ALLAYING THEM”.

    The Willink’s Commission of 1957, named after its chairman Mr. Harry Willink, produced a far-reaching report after extensive hearings of the complaints and suggestions from the people. It can be argued that no other document in the history of Nigeria has had far-reaching impact on our political structure than the Willink’s report. It guided the debates in subsequent constitutional conferences before the independence; gave structure to the emergent Constitutions and indeed gave health to the socio-political structure of the nation at independence.

    The greatest achievement of Willink’s Commission is that its report provided the colonial administration and the nation an in-depth understanding of the nature, dimensions and magnitude of the fears of the minority tribes. Accordingly, its recommended solutions became an official position and was easily accepted to be constitutionalised as a long-term measure.

    There is no gainsaying that reservations about the continued existence of Nigeria is building up to a dangerous time bomb. I make bold to say that no solution except one birthed by an independently conducted engagement with fact-based recommendations arrived at with the participation of the citizens will provide an enduring solution.

    The most outstanding recommendation of the Willink’s Commission as a long-time solution is the inclusion of a Fundamental Human Rights Chapter in the constitution. It was recommended that the inclusion of the Fundamental Human Rights Chapter in the constitution will protect all citizens, including the minority stock from any governmental and or majority bloc abuses. I must say at this point that it was the recommendations of the Willink’s commission that gave all the component groups in Nigeria the comfort to go into the union at independence.

    It has become apparent that the foundation of the various agitations in Nigeria today is that the comfort provided at independence by the Willink’s Commissions Report is no longer working. I make bold to recommend that Mr. President should make history by empaneling another commission of inquiry to inquire into the violent and non-violent agitations in Nigeria and make recommendations on the immediate-, short- and long-term solutions as a way of first de-escalating the rising tension in the land and a process for the renewal of our march to nationhood.

    It is important to note that in a democracy, no action is deemed successful or completed until the buy-in-of the people is secured through a democratic process. This buy-in- is an imperative that is yet to be pursued in the fight against violent agitations in Nigeria. I must say that as long as the people are not part of the process of finding solutions to the conflicts, a permanent solution will be a mirage.

    THE BENEFITS OF SUCH A COMMISSION

    i. The de-escalation of the current tension in the country and creation of a platform for exchange of ideas.

    ii. It is a natural Governmental process of addressing challenges of public importance. The report of such a commission will put in proper perspective and provide basis for further action.

    iii. It will offer the citizenry the opportunity and platform to share their concerns and to be heard. This helps to build confidence and reduce animosity and mutual suspicion.

    iv. It identifies the immediate and remote causes of the current challenges and provide a framework for their resolution.

    v. Such a commission will aim not only to unravel the remote and immediate causes but also determine the various dimensions and define them accordingly. E.g. democratic agitations will be separated from violent crimes to the understanding of all. It will also capture the reasons for the agitations and the Justice thereto.

    vi. Such a Commission will propose immediate-, short- and long-term solutions and develop a roadmap towards addressing them. Such roadmap used as a national reference document would guide further interactions and process for implementation.

    vii. Such document will be the foundation for a new Nigeria anchored on negotiated settlement derived from the legitimacy bestowed by citizen participation and the credibility of the commission.

    Above is submitted for your kind consideration Sir.

    Anyim Pius Anyim, GCON.
    Former Senate President
    Federal Republic of Nigeria

  • #TNGPIBConfab: Don’t just urgently pass PIB, ensure it caters for Nigeria’s future, Pius Anyim tells lawmakers

    #TNGPIBConfab: Don’t just urgently pass PIB, ensure it caters for Nigeria’s future, Pius Anyim tells lawmakers

    Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Anyim Pius Anyim on Wednesday tasked lawmakers not to just pass the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) but ensure that the bill on a holistic approach caters for the general interest of Nigeria and Nigerians.

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG reports that Anyim, a former lawmaker and Senate President said this during the second session of the ongoing #TNGPIBConfab which he chaired.

    “Let’s not ignore the real thrust, expectations that must be met in the PIB bill just because we want to urgently pass the bill. We should make provisions for local investors in the PIB bill and not jus wish all the opportunities to the global investors. Crude oil is going, will the law we want to make capture the challenges of the future. How do we secure the future of the country.

    On derivation, we need to look at role of a state in managing derivation as well as role of NDDC in managing derivations for the communities; what is the place of the host communities and that of an impacting community; I think it is important that to address issues of impacting community, ” he said.

  • 2023: Nothing under the law disqualifies Igbos from running for president – Anyim Pius Anyim

    2023: Nothing under the law disqualifies Igbos from running for president – Anyim Pius Anyim

    Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Anyim Pius Anyim on Friday made case for the election of an Igbo President come 2023.

    Highlighting the core characters of Igbos and why they deserve a chance to rule the country like other tribes, the former Senate President said: “I can describe the Igbos after President Kenedy’s choice description of America as “a country noted for progress and a nation reputed for strength”. The Igbo nation is no doubt a people latently enterprising, naturally brilliant and so fast in learning, noted for egalitarianism and so treasures their independence of mind, of body and of business. They are of great good conscience and so love justice and equity. Survival flows in their blood and so they are ingenious and creative. They make good of every endeavour, be it in politics, business, academics or science. They are naturally good managers of men and resources. They are tenaciously curious, highly mobile and spirited for progress. They make good business leaders and public administrators. In fact, the spirit of the Igbo man is the spirit of enterprise. They are widely travelled and can be found in every corner of the globe. They are friendly and love strangers.”

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG reports that Anyim disclosed this on Friday as a guest speaker at Sixth World Igbo Summit held at Gregory University, Uturu, Abia State.

    Anyim while further championing the emergence of Igbo presidency in 2023 said there is nothing under the Nigerian Constitution that disqualifies a Nigerian of Igbo extraction from seeking the highest office in the land. “Under the Constitution of Nigeria, every adult of 40 years of age is qualified to be elected to the Office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Accordingly, there is nothing under the law that disqualifies any Igbo man from aspiring to be President; the challenge is capacity to meet the mandatory requirement of the highest number of votes and spread.

    The other angle to this perspective is whether zoning the Presidency to the South-East geo-political zone is a right? Legally, the answer is no, but morally there is a merit in such demand. This expectation, canvases that the federal character principle has assumed a legal backing. Just as the rotation of the Presidency is not captured in the constitution neither is the geo-political zoning arrangement. Still, the fact of the reality of the application of the zonal structure in our national equilibrium has assumed universal moral force that can no longer be ignored nor dispensed with. For such critical national office as the Office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria not to be rotated among the zones can only breed discontent and disharmony.

    It can further be argued that zoning and rotation has acquired a moral force that its continued absence from our constitution is a major lacunae that must be addressed. Pending the ‘constitutionalisation’ of the above, I urge the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to make it a prerequisite for political parties to have explicit provisions on rotation of the Presidency in their constitutions before registration. The PDP was halfway to it by agreeing to a North-South rotation instead of a zone-to-zone rotation.”

    The versatile ex-lawmaker also charged leaders of the region not to approach the agitation for the Igbo presidency with entitlement mentality while relating with people of leaders of other region. He advised them to be friendly while bargaining for the envious position in a bid to better fix the country.

    “I recommend that in our engagement with other zones and peoples, our tone must reflect negotiation, not antagonism. It must be one of friendship and not disdain or disrespect. It must show our willingness to enter into an enduring and lasting relationship for long term interest of all the parties.

    I make bold to say that producing a President of Nigeria of South-East extraction demands a lot of work from every segment of the Igbo nation. I therefore use this platform to call on all and sundry to rise to the occasion. The task is achievable if approached collectively and adequately,” he said.

  • Identifying the Political Interest of the Igbos of the South-East Geopolitical Zone in Nigeria and Strategies for its Actualisation, By Anyim Pius Anyim

    Identifying the Political Interest of the Igbos of the South-East Geopolitical Zone in Nigeria and Strategies for its Actualisation, By Anyim Pius Anyim

    TEXT OF A LECTURE DELIVERED BY SEN. ANYIM PIUS ANYIM AT THE 6TH WORLD IGBO SUMMIT HELD ON THE 18TH DECEMBER 2020 AT GREGORY UNIVERSITY, UTURU, ABIA STATE.

    INTRODUCTION
    Let me begin by expressing my profound gratitude to the Leadership of
    Gregory University and particularly the World Igbo Summit Group and the Igbo Renaissance Centre of the University for the honour of this invitation. I am proud of what this University has come to represent in our collective effort to build a better society in Igbo land and Nigeria as a whole. I understand this is the sixth edition of this lecture series. I also know that very eminent individuals, academics, and leaders have delivered this lecture before me. I want to thank Gregory University for this thoughtful initiative and urge them to sustain it.

    I looked at the topic provided by the organisers, for this lecture “Building Cooperation, and viable networks to strengthen the Igbo interest within the Nigerian Federation” and decided to tinker with it. Let me crave the permission of the World Igbo Summit Group to adjust the topic to be “IDENTIFYING THE POLITICAL INTEREST OF THE IGBOS OF THE SOUTH-EAST GEO-POLITICAL ZONE IN NIGERIA AND STRATEGIES FOR ITS ACTUALISATION. Permit me not to give reasons for the adjustment but suffice it to say that the new topic will shape my thoughts to flow directly to the political mood of the moment. I shall, therefore, try not to be academic but practical. I shall also try to be short and direct in making my points and suggestions. Accordingly, I shall attempt my brief discussion of this topic under the following headings.
    – Who are the Igbos?
    – How are the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone located
    within the Nigerian politics?
    – What is the present-day political interest of the Igbos of the SouthEast geo-political zone?
    – The quest for the election of a Nigerian President of South-East
    extraction and strategies for its actualisation

    WHO ARE THE IGBOS?
    Igbo land is located in Southeastern Nigeria with a total land area of about 41,000 km². It stretches from the low-lying riverbank of the Niger river comprising of the Aniomas of Delta State through to the Ikweres of River State, cutting the fringes of Cross River and Akwa-Ibom States to the Igbo heartland of Anambra, Imo, Enugu, Abia and my own very Ebonyi State. On the Northern flank, the Igbo nation, shares affinity with a number of other communities e.g. Umezekaoha of Benue State and Eke Avurugo community in Kogi State. The Igbos are one of the largest ethnic groups in Africa and comprised of about thirty-two million people, i.e. about 18% of the Nigerian population.

    In his work titled “the Ibos of Nigeria, Ancient Rites, changes and survival”, published on the 1st of July, 1990 by Edwin Mellen, Mr Njoku, John E. Eberegbulam, described the Igbos as immensely proud, dynamic, progressive and ambitious people.

    I can describe the Igbos after President Kenedy’s choice description of
    America as “a country noted for progress and a nation reputed for strength”. The Igbo nation is no doubt a people latently enterprising, naturally brilliant and so fast in learning, noted for egalitarianism and so treasures their independence of mind, of body and of business. They are of great good conscience and so love justice and equity. Survival flows in their blood and so they are ingenious and creative. They make good of every endeavour, be it in politics, business, academics or science. They are naturally good managers of men and resources. They are tenaciously curious, highly mobile and spirited for progress. They make good business leaders and public administrators. In fact, the spirit of the Igbo man is the spirit of enterprise. They are widely travelled and can be found in every corner of the globe. They are friendly and love strangers.

    One can see from the above that the interest of every Igbo man at any time is diverse but paramount among which is the peace and progress of the community he finds himself. However, the focus of our discussion today is the political interest of the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone.

    HOW ARE THE IGBOS OF THE SOUTH-EAST GEO-POLITICAL ZONE
    LOCATED WITHIN THE NIGERIAN POLITICS?
    The Nigerian nation for political administration is structured into states. There are 36 States in Nigeria, each of which constitutes an independent federating unit, the totality of which makes up the Nigerian Federation. Each State comprises of an administrative capital with component local government administrations and federal constituencies. By virtue of being a federating unit, each State is empowered under the law to make its legislation, budget and expenditures. Above all, each State draws from the Federation Account
    following the Federal sharing formula. The central point of emphasis here is that each State is politically autonomous. Accordingly, political rights are exercisable solely based on one’s membership of the State regardless of his or her ethnic nationalities. Consequently, though there are Igbos in Delta, Rivers, Akwa-Ibom, Benue, Kogi and Cross River States, their political rights are exercisable as members of their respective States. Their rights do not extend to any possibility of their representing the Igbos in any other State.

    The next political structure is the geo-political structure. Indeed, the zonal structure has not found legal backing, but there is no gainsaying that it has assumed a moral force waiting to be constitutionalised. The zoning principle has found expression in the allocation of political and developmental benefits. The rotation of prime positions among geo-political zones has no doubt become a common practice such that, its breach generates political discontentment. The point to note is that a political benefit accruing to any geo-political zone cannot be satisfied by appointing any person outside of that geo-political zone irrespective of commonality of language or culture. i.e. political office zoned to the South East does not extend to Igbos from a zone outside the South-East geo-political zone.

    In all, I assert that ethnic demography is not the same as political geographic boundaries, and so what belongs to the South-East geo-political zone cannot be claimed by any Igbo man outside the South-East geo-political zone.

    WHAT IS THE PRESENT-DAY POLITICAL INTEREST OF THE IGBOS?
    I have heard many ask, “what is the interest of the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone?”. Some others will rhetorically ask, “is it secession or the Presidency?”; more recently, restructuring has featured most prominently in the basket.

    I have noted above that given the intellectual endowment and versatility of the average Igbo man; his interests are diverse per time. Some have even posited that the Igbos should limit their interest to commercial and entrepreneurial concern; (areas of famed comparative advantage). I make bold to say that no matter the natural endowment of the Igbo man, it does not remove from the fact that man is a political animal. It is also important to note that the concept of nationality and citizenship has elevated the desire of any man to belong to a national entity where he enjoys full rights of citizenship. It is essential to understand that the implication of citizenship to any man is the benefits that flow from it, i.e. right to vote and to be voted for, equality before the law, protection of fundamental rights etc. These rights can be summarised as social, political and economic rights. The benefits of
    these rights to the citizens are the central pillars underpinning modern
    society and democracy. The denial of these rights or lack of protection when demanded is the bane of every political agitations which may find expression through various responses and approaches.

    It is my opinion that the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone is in
    continuous search of a system, or if you like, a polity that guarantees and secures his social, political and economic interest based on equality of citizenship, equity and justice. I make bold to say that the Igbos of the SouthEast geo-political zone can find this in Nigeria. The journey to building an equitable society is usually challenging and rough, but many nations have arrived safely from this journey. It is, therefore, my position that those who posit restructuring have a point but should work harder to secure national consensus to make it possible. Also those who advocate for President of Nigeria of South-East extraction should diligently and boldly pursue it for the time has come, and the time is now. It is, therefore, my considered view that the present-day political interest of the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone is to attain the Presidency of Nigeria come 2023.

    PERSPECTIVES OF THE QUEST FOR PRESIDENT OF NIGERIA OF
    SOUTH EAST EXTRACTION AND THE STRATEGIES FOR ITS
    ACTUALISATION.
    I shall consider the perspectives under three critical questions and provide answers alongside suggested strategies i.e.
    – Is President of South-East extraction a right?
    – Is President of South-East extraction an entitlement?
    – Should President of Nigeria of South-East extraction be a gift?

    IS PRESIDENT OF SOUTH-EAST EXTRACTION A RIGHT?
    Under the Constitution of Nigeria, every adult of 40 years of age is qualified to be elected to the Office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Accordingly, there is nothing under the law that disqualifies any Igbo man from aspiring to be President; the challenge is capacity to meet the mandatory requirement of the highest number of votes and spread.

    The other angle to this perspective is whether zoning the Presidency to the South-East geo-political zone is a right? Legally, the answer is no, but morally there is a merit in such demand. This expectation, canvases that the federal character principle has assumed a legal backing. Just as the rotation of the Presidency is not captured in the constitution neither is the geo-political zoning arrangement. Still, the fact of the reality of the application of the zonal structure in our national equilibrium has assumed universal moral force that can no longer be ignored nor dispensed with. For such critical national office as the Office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria not to be rotated among the zones can only breed discontent and disharmony.

    It can further be argued that zoning and rotation has acquired a moral force that its continued absence from our constitution is a major lacunae that must be addressed. Pending the ‘constitutionalisation’ of the above, I urge the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to make it a prerequisite for political parties to have explicit provisions on rotation of the Presidency in their constitutions before registration. The PDP was halfway to it by agreeing to a North-South rotation instead of a zone-to-zone rotation. Given the above, the following strategies are recommended:
    – All Igbo sons and daughters in any political party should strive to ensure “rotation of Presidency” clause in their party constitutions.
    – All Igbos in the National Assembly should seek collaboration with
    members from other zones to amend the Electoral Act to accommodate a provision that compels INEC to ensure rotation clause in political parties constitutions as a requirement for registration.

    IS PRESIDENT OF SOUTH EAST EXTRACTION AN ENTITLEMENT
    I must make bold to say that it is not an entitlement. This is so because,
    even if it is zoned, it will still be subject to electioneering processes, as it is still the outcome of the process of election that will make one a President. The right to vote and whom to vote for is a free choice. Electioneering involves mobilisation for votes, campaigning for support and each candidate making an effort to gain the confidence of the electorates nationwide. It must be clear that zoning cannot take away the right of voters to vote freely for candidates of their choice. Accordingly, actualising the quest for a Nigerian President of the South-East extraction cannot be by agitation but by persuasion; not by coercion, but by coalition-building and cooperation; not by alienation, but by alliance. Therefore, I recommend that the various segments of the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone; the professionals, politicians, activists, business class, youths, students, etc. should constructively and creatively engage their counterparts from other
    parts of the country. This engagement will engender confidence and create opportunity for making the necessary compromises to secure their support and votes.

    IS PRESIDENT OF SOUTH EAST EXTRACTION A GIFT?
    Let me again make bold to say that it can not be a gift. The concept of equal
    citizenship means that the nation, its resources and leadership belong to all
    Nigerians. The fair application of this equality of rights concept is what
    guarantees the cohesion of every society, particularly a multi-ethnic nation like Nigeria. The peace, prosperity and general progress of every country is dependent on how institutions are strengthened to ensure equality before the law. In recognition of the above, it is essential to note that no particular individual or group owns the leadership of the country and so nobody gives it. Many are of the view that power is not given but taken and the only way to win power in a democracy is by persuasion and through the ballot box. Accordingly, we note that in the exercise of the voters right of choice under the law, the voter is protected from coercion. And so, to persuade another
    to exercise his right in your favour, you must seek his cooperation and
    alliance.
    I recommend that in our engagement with other zones and peoples, our tone must reflect negotiation, not antagonism. It must be one of friendship and not disdain or disrespect. It must show our willingness to enter into an enduring and lasting relationship for long term interest of all the parties.

    CONCLUSION
    I make bold to say that producing a President of Nigeria of South-East
    extraction demands a lot of work from every segment of the Igbo nation. I therefore use this platform to call on all and sundry to rise to the occasion. The task is achievable if approached collectively and adequately.

    Most importantly, to strengthen the capacity of the Igbos of the South-East geo-political zone to negotiate and ultimately win the Presidency, there is an urgent need for civic and voter education to increase voter turnout. The South-East is currently the zone with the least voter turnout, and this should change. Institutions like the World Igbo Summit should actively promote voter education and civic engagement. Moreso, every Igbo organization and association should arise and promote voter education and civic engagement. I call on each and everyone of us to stand to be counted.