Tag: Bills

  • Buhari signs 3 anti-money laundering bills into law

    Buhari signs 3 anti-money laundering bills into law

    President Muhammadu Buhari has signed into law, three bills aimed at improving the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing/proliferation financing framework in Nigeria.

    The bills are the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Bill, 2022, the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Bill, 2022, and the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Bill, 2022.

    Buhari said while signing the laws at the Council Chamber, State House, Abuja, on Thursday, that the bills were in tandem with this administration’s commitment to fight corruption and illicit financing activities, as well as critical to the governance agenda and the development of Nigeria.

    “The new laws have provided enough punitive measures and containment strategies against abuses and compromises,” he said.

    He noted that the inadequacy of all the repealed Acts had impacted legal actions against offender.

    “We will not rest until we rid the nation of the menace of money laundering, terrorism, and other financial crimes,” he added.

    Buhari commended the National Assembly for the tenacity, courage and commitment in ensuring that Nigeria put in place effective measures to address the menace of money laundering, terrorism, and its financing.

    According to him, the 9th National Assembly has proven to be patriotic, responsive, resourceful and industrious in its legislative assignments, recalling that on 14th January, 2022, he had sought expeditious passage of the bills.

    He lauded the Assembly under Senate President Ahmed Lawan and the Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila and their colleagues for responding to his request, saying they “have certainly carved out a worthy legacy for themselves”.

    On the importance of the legislations, the President said:

    “The signing of these Bills into law today strengthens the Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework in the Country.

    It also addresses the deficiencies identified in Nigeria’s 2nd round of Mutual Evaluation as assessed by Inter-Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa on compliance with the Financial Action Task Force global standards.”

    Buhari said the repeal of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and enactment of Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 provided comprehensive legal and Institutional Framework for prevention and prohibition of money laundering in Nigeria.

    It also confers the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the legal status of the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering.

    He said the laws provided for the effective implementation of international instruments on the prevention and combating of terrorism and suppression of the financing of terrorism.

    “The enactment of the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act, 2022 makes comprehensive provisions for the seizure, confiscation, forfeiture and management of properties derived from unlawful activity.’’

    Buhari revealed that the executive arm of government “carefully avoided creating another asset recovery and management agency with its cost implications in deference to government’s sensitivity to the rising cost of governance”.

    According to him, the new law mandates the creation of dedicated accounts for the proceeds of crime and other confiscated assets, to enhance the accountability of the process.

    “I have therefore taken time to note the emphasis placed on collaboration, synergy and unification of strategies and measures to combat the scourge of Money Laundering and terrorism financing and proliferation financing in the Act.

    “The primary objectives of these measures are to ensure effective, unified and comprehensive legal, regulatory and institutional framework for the implementation of the Acts.

    “This is profound and calls for coordinated responses to the challenges posed by the menace.

    “I therefore charge all relevant agencies to ensure effective implementation of these new laws.

    “The robust frameworks diligently enshrined in the Acts can only serve useful purposes when every bit of them is enforced.”

    While stressing that the fight against corruption required an “All of Government, All of Nation approach’’, the president affirmed that every Nigerian had a role to play to rid the country of corrupt practices.

    He commended the members of the National Action Task Force, comprising several Ministries, Departments and Agencies of government.

    He observed that “the bills are a clear demonstration of government functioning at its best with coordination, collaboration, and execution, all towards a common goal’’.

    The President assured Nigerians that his administration would continue to do its best to secure the nation.

    He added that the bills, signed into law, represented not just legislative instruments but very significant governmental actions projecting courage, determination and sincerity in tackling the menace of money laundering, terrorism and other financial crimes.

    The event was attended by the Senate President and other senators, the Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami and Heads of anti-corruption agencies, including ICPC and EFCC.

  • Women at war: Gender equality bills to the rescue – By Dakuku Peterside

    Women at war: Gender equality bills to the rescue – By Dakuku Peterside

    By Dakuku Peterside

    Within the last three weeks, three significant events happened. First, during the constitution amendment, the National Assembly rejected five gender bills, and as expected, our womenfolk were enraged. The world celebrated women’s day, and this year the campaign theme was “Breaking the Bias”. Nigerian women from all backgrounds and social strata mobilised in their numbers to protest at the National Assembly in what they considered the mother of all protest, which signposts the new dawn for women. What is the significance of these events? Beyond the rhetoric of affirmation and striving for gender equality, what must Nigerian women do to confront the hydra-headed problem of the girl child and women in our society? Post gender bills, what real issues stop women from realising their full potential in Nigeria? These questions call for introspection and reflection on the urgency of social change in gender relations.

    These recent events and related responses demonstrate the acute sensitivity and sheer determination Nigeria women have about issues of gender inequalities. Their actions are galvanising a critical mass of voices clamouring for a change to the status quo, and the ring of these voices are reaching a crescendo in advocating for women empowerment and simply asking for our Nigerian women to enjoy just a few of the privileges Nigerian men have that seem ‘commonsensical’ and normal.

    I must unequivocally state that I stand with these women in their struggle for fairness and equity. I salute their resolute stand in fighting for what is right. I believe that a nation that neglects or sidesteps 50% of its population and workforce simply because of path dependency on patriarchy is a nation doomed to fail. Improving and harnessing the talents and gifts in our women is a no brainer, and it baffles most people that any institution will be insensitive or undermine this, much more an institution representing this 50% population in the national assembly.

    The five gender bills rejected at the National Assembly will not bring gender equality. But they are the first and foundational steps in the climb to gender equality. These bills request women to have a minor stake in areas historically dominated by men.

    These five bills include: first, a bill to create additional seats for women to increase women’s representation in the National Assembly – this bill will lead to a significant increase in the number of women in the Parliament, which currently stands at 5 per cent; second, a bill to enable Nigerian women to transfer citizenship to foreign husbands, a right that every Nigerian man married to a foreign spouse enjoys; third, a bill to ensure affirmative action of at least 35 per cent in political party administration and appointive positions across federal and state levels; fourth, a bill to provide a minimum of 20 per cent of ministerial or commissioner nominees are women; fifth, a Bill to allow a woman to become an indigene of her husband’s state after five years of marriage. The National Assembly rejected all these bills, and womenfolk primarily saw it as a marker of insistence on the old order.

    The broader significance of the rejection of these bills is that the progress of Nigerian women in the quest for a more egalitarian society seems to be momentarily truncated. All the proposed constitutional amendments were meant to end bias against women and ensure the minimisation, if not total removal, of barriers millions of women faces based on their gender. These rejections speak volumes as to the mindset of most people, especially men in power and male-dominated institutions. As products of patriarchy, the National assembly reified the dominant ideology prevalent in our society, which is sympathetic to the plight of our women but fights hard to stop any change to the status quo. This ideology is seen in culture, religion, and politics.

    Suffice to say that this is not a typical Nigerian problem andseem global. Still, most societies, especially developed ones, have made progress in improving the opportunities available to women and the quality and impact of women in their society. These societies are tackling these dominant masculine ideologies at the basic levels of family, community, and religion by creating an ecosystem to normalise gender equality.

    Any struggle for gender equity that neglects the battle for the minds and hearts of people and advocacy to make people understand the importance of gender equality at the micro-levels of society will not succeed. Little wonder many of the representatives, although paying lips service to the issues of gender equality, refused to vote for it in the constitutional amendment voting in the hallowed chambers. The bills succumbed to the intricate politics, intrigues, and horse-trading peculiar to the national assembly. The high-powered advocacy given to this bill by the wives of the president, vice president and all the governors in Nigeria is not enough to get both houses to pass some of the bills.

    This rejection was more poignant because it happened when women worldwide celebrated “International Women’s Day” with the theme “Gender equality today for a sustainable tomorrow”. This celebration is at the core of putting women and their issues at the heart of global politics and governance and the emerging global socio-political and socio-economic milieu.

    Women worldwide watched to see how the Nigerian Parliament would vote on those issues and give them something to celebrate this year. They were utterly disappointed. Little wonder our women took to the street and marched to end oppressive tendencies against them. Women in their numbers marched to the National Assembly to register their disgust at the parliamentarians’ actions that failed to pass the five gender bills.

    The protest acknowledges that in most countries, even in advanced democracies, better women representation came out of protracted legislative and civil rights actions. A price must be paid for change, irrespective of its low or high cost. Freedom is not free, and our women have shown they are ready to get dirty to win their freedom.

    These women are following in the footsteps of great women of yesteryears that marched against the colonial masters and specifically against their tax policies that resulted in the now-famous Aba Women’s Riot of 1929. Just like other famous women advocates of the past – such as Chief Olufunmilayo Ransome Kuti, Hajia Gambo Sawaba, and Chief Margaret Ekpo – these doyens of democracy and gender equality crusaders are pushing hard to get the National Assembly to have a second look at the bills and reconsider their stance. Fortunately, The House of Representatives will be voting again on three gender bills – citizenship, indigeneship and 35% affirmative action in party administration. This step is crucial because it will give the bills a second chance and might upend consideration for change in the status quo.

    The realities of women’s political participation are staggering. Although statistics show that more women vote than men in our general elections, they are dangerously less represented in our government. The Nigerian Senate has only eight female senators out of 109; only 13 female houses of representative’s members out of 360, and 44 out of 991 state legislators are females. There are 15 State houses of assembly out of 36 with no women as legislators and no female governors. These disturbing statistics show a deep-rooted bias against women holding leadership positions, and if we do not take urgent steps now, these numbers will continue to slide from bad to worse.

    Beyond the gender bills, we need to do more to uplift girls and women in our society. A panoply of issues bedevils women’s progress in our society that men and women face but have the most devastating effect on women. These issues include the persistent and increasing burden of poverty on women, the inequalities, inadequacies and unequal access to education and training for women, and unequal access to health care and related services. Women also face violence against them, adverse effects of armed and non-armed conflict on women, especially with the emergence of Boko haram, banditry, and its likes. Prevalent inequality in economic structures and policies in all forms of productive activities and access to resources. Women are victims of inequality in power relations and decision-making, at all levels; insufficient mechanisms, at all levels, to promote the advancement of women; a lack of respect for, and inadequate promotion and protection of, the human rights of women; stereotyping of women amongst others.

    Advocating for higher representation of women in elective and appointive offices is critical. And it may potentially be attained through some form of legislative intervention, as seen in other parts of the world. However, a change in attitude amongst and towards women and massive education of the girl child will help advance the agitation of women to be considered equal within their homes and in Nigerian society.

    Educating our children from an early age about issues and the importance of gender equality, changing our attitude towards the girl child, and massive education of the girl child is viable, necessary steps towards addressing gender inequality. Representation is only one step and cannot be done in isolation of other essential steps.

    The issue of uplifting women in our society is for the benefit of all. Highly productive and engaged women in our society will add to our country’s development and unleash great development strides. Women are our mothers, wives, daughters, and sisters, and they deserve better than the men in Nigeria allow them to get. They need to be freed from the encumbrances of gender discrimination and inequalities, and the government must be leading this significant change in society. It is the task of everyone in our society to change the age-long practices and dogmas that have held women’s emancipation hostage for a long time.

    I will recommend that more sensitisation programmes and advocacy projects be carried out on this issue to get the buy-in of most people in the country. Also, in my experience of passing laws in Nigeria, I understand that lobbying for votes requires articulation, resources, and time to be successful. Our women need to mobilise and pressure the system for their rights per their demographic dominance. Rights are often secured, not handed on a platter. It is a fact that some men will not hand over male privileges simply because of little agitations and niceties from women. More work is required to bring about a complete change in attitude, orientation and actions that are anti-women in our society.

  • Lobbying for gender related bills came in late – House Spokesman

    Lobbying for gender related bills came in late – House Spokesman

    Spokesman of the House of Representatives, Hon Benjamin Kalu has said lobbying by the female gender stakeholders came in late as reason behind the rejection of women Bills by the lawmakers during the report consideration of constitution act amendment.

    Kalu who is also Chairman of the House committee on media and public affairs disclosed this to newsmen in Abuja while at a media briefing.

    The Abia born lawmaker explained that in view of the socio-cultural and religious sensitiveness of the issues, effective lobbying, sensitisation and consultations by the female gender and stakeholders across the country would have been intensified earlier to attract maximum support.

    According to him, this lobbying was done a bit late. The advocacy would have started longer than now. You don’t lobby two days to an important issue like this.

    “It goes beyond lobbying at the last minute. It takes a lot of reorientation, advocacy and sensitization to enable people to buy into this all important agenda because you can not play down on our current issues with regards to emerging democracy.

    “One of which is our religious and cultural dispositions. These things play a role. We’re part of the society. Our culture and religion are part of the society. It needs a lot of advocacy by the civil society organisations, women group to push this agenda forward. It’s a wonderful agenda. But for people to buy into it even from the constituent not their representatives because Nigerians are shifting their focus to the representatives and their senators only. It was not the representatives and the senators that did the job. It was the instructions from their various constituencies. This is the truth that must be told.

    “And if the House as an institution was not interested in this agenda, it wouldn’t have passed the first reading, second reading and be allowed to go to the committee level and be one of the issues mentioned on the day of public hearing which means that the institution has given it all the wills to succeed but the joy of canvassing for the support to change our long standing dispositions culturally and religiously which we can not wave away. It takes time. It has started well. We’ll keep pushing”.

    “Let us do a fair comparative analysis. Most of these nations we are using to compare with Nigeria started somewhere. Now that this agenda has been stimulated in the minds of Nigerians let’s not stop there. Let the CSOs and women not give up. Let them leaverage what they have achieved in pushing for this so far”, he said.

    While encouraging the women not to give up in their struggle, he assured that there is always time to review the constitution again as no law is cast on stone.

    He therefore commended the Wives of the president, Vice president as well as the Minister of women affairs for supporting their womenfolk.

  • Senate passes 49 out of 68 constitution bills

    Senate passes 49 out of 68 constitution bills

    The Senate on Tuesday passed a total of 49 bills out of the 68 considered during voting on the Constitution Bills.

    The bills were contained in report of the Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.

    A total of 19 alteration bills failed to make passage during the voting exercise which lasted almost five hours during plenary.

    President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, while setting the tone for voting on the bills, explained that only bills which enjoyed passage in both chambers would be transmitted to the State Houses of Assemblies for concurrence.

    According to him, any bill which fails to pass in the Senate or House of Representatives during voting automatically stands rejected by the National Assembly.

  • Shalewa Ashafa reveals:  Earnings from acting do not pay my bills

    Shalewa Ashafa reveals: Earnings from acting do not pay my bills

    Nigerian actress, Shalewa Ashafa, has revealed that earnings from acting does not give her much money to take care of all her bills.

    The actress also disclosed that contrary to the views held by Nigerians based on her pranks in social media that she was married, “the truth is that I am still single.

    She said: “To be honest, in this economy that we’re in, no profession or job can solely take care of all your bills. Of course I have other things that I do to supplement acting.

    “I run a small business called The Next Door Bakery. I plan opening more businesses soon.

    She further refuted claims on most online platforms stating her marital status as married, stating that she is still single.”

    She stated that the marriage prank she did during the covid19 lockdown has continued to hunt her.

    According to her, I pulled a silly marriage prank during the COVID lockdown out of boredom on my Instagram.

    “I did a wedding photoshoot for a magazine with my colleague Udoka Onyeka and I decided to prank people that we got married when posting the pictures.

    “Before I knew it, all the blogs had put up the story. NO! I AM NOT MARRIED to anyone at the moment.

    The 27-year-old actress who hails from Ogun state in Ijebu-Ode Local Government Area, LGA, has said that her interest for acting started as a child at the age of seven and that the flair began as a result of her family’s engagement in the movie industry.

    There are other exciting things she said during the interview, excerpt:

    Can you introduce yourself?

    My name is Shalewa Ashafa. In full it is Omoshalewa and my friends mostly call me by
    my social media name ‘ShalewaStar’ or ‘ShallyStar.’ I was born on the 12th of July, 1995 in Lagos state. I’m Yoruba and I’m from Ogun state, Ijebu-Ode local government. I attended Christ the
    Cornerstone International Primary school, Lagos. I attended 4 different secondary schools
    between Benin, Lagos and Osun state as I had to move around a lot due to the nature of my mother’s business.

    However, the secondary school I graduated from is Iloko Model College in Osun state. I did my undergraduate program in the University of Lagos where I studied Advertising.

    Can you remember your first film and what the experience was like?

    I acted my first stage play when I was 9 years old. After that, I did a bunch of voice acting and cameos in stage plays. This lasted only a year as my mom and siblings considered it distracting for me from school work but I stuck to the craft by joining the drama club in my
    church and school. I was not getting paid or compensated in any way or form but I honestly did not mind considering I was doing something I enjoyed.

    What are the films you have featured and produced?

    I have been in a number of films, I cannot list them all right now but some of my prominent works are Ajoche, I played the lead role ‘Elakeche.’ I had my first cinema debut last year (2021) in the movie ‘The Razz Guy’ which featured the likes of Broda Shaggi, Lasisi Elenu and Nancy Isime. I have also featured in a couple of YouTube series such as Ndani Tv’s ‘Phases’ Season 2 and ‘Life as it is’ which got an Africa Magic Viewers Choice Award nod.

    Who are your role models in the industry?

    I will not say I have specific role models in the industry but there are people whose work ethics I respect and learn from. I am fascinated by how flawless they execute every role given to them. Do I have people that I really want to work with someday? Yes. One person that stands out for me always is Nse Ikpe-Etim. I’m in awe every single time I watch her in any movie. I look forward to working with her someday.

    Have you won awards or nominations?

    Not yet. Hopefully, very soon. So far, I have been nominated once for the category ‘Best Actress in a television series’ for my role as ‘Elakeche’ in Ajoche.

    As an actress, what is your selling point?

    Should there be anything else except my talent? (laughs) I’m a fantastic actress if I do say so myself. I pride myself on being dedicated to perfecting my craft for every new role I take and that right there is what has gotten me recognized in my industry.

    Many actresses flaunt their endowments on social media. Where should one draw the lines when flaunting the body?

    I’m a strong believer in being as free as you want to be as long as it does not hurt the next person.

    What are the high and low moments of your career?

    So far, thankfully, there have been no low moments in my career. The highs are yet to come too. Exciting moments? Maybe but nothing specifically euphoric.

    *What does being sexy mean to you?

    Being sexy to me is being confident in who you are and your craft. Being able to stand out in any gathering you find yourself. Humility and willingness to always learn regardless of how good you are at whatever you do is another thing I find attractive.

    What sacrifices have you made in pursuing acting?

    My education. My education suffered a lot. I spent more time on set than I did in school. Some people are good at joggling multiple things at a time, sadly, I am not one of them. So my career, in a way, affected my education. But at the end of the day, it was worth it so I have noregrets.

    I would love to see us reach Hollywood standards. I know we’ll get there one day.

  • Sanwo-Olu signs bills for additional 2 varsities in Lagos

    Sanwo-Olu signs bills for additional 2 varsities in Lagos

    Gov. Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State on Wednesday signed the bills for the establishment of two additional universities in the state.

    Sanwo-Olu signed the bill at the Lagos House, Marina, to establish the Lagos State University of Education (LASUED) and Lagos State University of Science and Technology respectively.

    The bills is to upgrade the Lagos State Polytechnic in Ikorodu, Isolo and Surulere campuses to the University of Science and Technology.

    The bill will also ensure the changing of Adeniran Ogunsanya Colleges of Education, Ijanikin and Michael Otedola College of Primary Education, Epe to Lagos State University of Education.

    Speaking at the signing ceremony, the governor said that Lagos residents were now blessed with two additional universities to the existing Lagos State University (LASU), established in 1982 by the First Executive Governor of the state, the late Alhaji Lateef Jakande.

    He said that the state government would take the law to the National Universities Commission (NUC) for due process.

    According to him, the government is believing a timely approval from NUC, as it longs to receive the certificates for the establishment of the two universities.

    ”We believe that the transmission would be smooth. We believe that the process would be without any hindrance. We believe that we will do a good job at ensuring that what is best is the only thing that we do for Lagos.

    ”I feel so delighted and proud of all of us creating history today and I believe that indeed generations coming after us will remember this very bold, audacious decision that we have taken.

    ”The two institutions that have now been transmitted into universities are institutions that have produced professionals, students, lecturers among others notable men and women in our society,” he said.

    Sanwo-Olu said that what the government had done was proper, for the existing staff, both academic and non-academic and more importantly, for the students today and in future.

    Speaking earlier, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Education, Mr Tokunbo Wahab said the establishment of LASUED and the Lagos State University of Science and Technology, would solve issues relating to admission for Lagos State citizens.

    Wahab commended Gov. Sanwo-Olu for assenting to the establishment of the two more universities and the Lagos State House of Assembly, led by the Speaker, Mr Mudashiru Obasa for believing in the process.

  • Picking the bills is not enough – Francis Ewherido

    Picking the bills is not enough – Francis Ewherido

    By Francis Ewherido

    I read a post where a friend was talking about housewives who inflate children’s school fees to dupe their husbands. She was condemning the act, which actually is most condemnable.

    But my interest was not in the fraudulent behaviour of these women. I wondered why these men do not know the fees of their children.

    Do they feel that providing money for the children’s fees is enough? Is it possible that beyond providing money for the fees, they do not get involved in any other aspect of the children’s education? It could also be that they are practising division of labour: I provide the money, my wife makes the payment. Unfortunately these wives are toying with a fundamental element in their marriages: trust. But that is not the issue of concern today.

    Any sensible man should make financial arrangements for his old age and retirement. Old age/retirement is too delicate a time to leave to the whims and caprices of others, including your children

    Last Sunday, a woman and her four children, probably between three and 12, sat two pews in front of me in church. The children were so noisy and uncontrollable throughout; they were a real nuisance. The mother made occasional feeble interventions, but that was it.

    As a result of their uncontrollable behaviour, I asked myself, where is their father? It is possible he is out of town, or one of those fathers who take their families to church and drive off to engage in some other activities. My experience over time is that the fathers of such uncontrollable children are usually absent in the children’s lives.

    Many men still do not get it, God made it in a way that both parents are supposed to collaborate to bring up their offspring. If God felt one parent was enough, He could have made human beings hermaphrodites. The family unit is one institution I have been interested in for a long time before I started studying it consciously.

    I have seen offspring of families where the father shirked his responsibilities; I have also seen children from families where the mother shirked her responsibilities; I have seen children from families where both parents left them to their own devices. The outcomes have not been the best.

    Today, when I see how the children have turned, and are turning, out, I appreciate the sacrifice. The children are grounded, unassuming, level headed and focused.

    We have exceptional cases where single parents are raising the children. This happens when the couple is divorced, separated (temporarily or permanently) or when one spouse is late. The surviving spouse plays the role of father and mother. Some of them are putting in their best to make the children’s lives as complete and stable as possible, but they will readily confess to you that it is tough playing the dual roles.

    A family, with both parents present and involved, remains the best environment to raise stable children.

    Back to the men; many fathers still feel that paying school and picking other bills are enough for the children. Have you discussed with your children or listened to their conversations? I have and I also rub minds with other parents who do. Children appreciate parents for paying their fees, among other financial commitments alright, but you will be shocked when they do their recollections of their earlier years.

    They talk about those times when their fathers gave them their baths, fathers driving them to school instead of their drivers, fathers being present at open day, inter-house sports and other school events; fathers spending quality time with them and fathers being in their lives generally. Their most cherished memories are when their father made sacrifices in terms of time.

    Of course it might be slightly different in homes with lean resources, where fathers give up a lot of material comfort to provide the children comfort or education. But there is still a common denominator: sacrifice. It is the sacrifice that they appreciate and treasure most.

    I always wondered why a multibillionaire I know drove his children to and fro school if his wife was not able to do so. There were drivers in the house and he could employ a driver for each child. But the wife did the school runs and he took over if she was indisposed or unavailable.

    Today, when I see how the children have turned, and are turning, out, I appreciate the sacrifice. The children are grounded, unassuming, level headed and focused. It is a far cry from many silver spoon-fed kids, who have their heads in the clouds and just want to enjoy without adding value either to their lives or the family’s. The last time I saw him, you could touch the joy and contentment he felt about how his children are turning out.

    Fathers need to be futuristic in perception and action. Your children are your future. Build a strong bond now, make sacrifices. Just as parenting goes beyond financial commitments, so also taking care of parents in old age goes beyond sending money to them for upkeep.

    A young man told me in course of our discussion that his father is in the village, of course, lonely. Meanwhile the mother is here in Lagos with him. He sends the father money every month, but might not see him in a whole year because there is no bond. What happened? The father was not there for them when they were growing up. In addition, he was a bully and often maltreated their mother. As children, they watched helplessly and gnashed their teeth. Now, it is payback time.

    Some farsighted retirees I know have already sorted out their financial future, so it is not an issue of children sending money. Any sensible man should make financial arrangements for his old age and retirement. Old age/retirement is too delicate a time to leave to the whims and caprices of others, including your children. But even if you accumulate tons of money, someone has to apply it with love to bring you joy in old age. You also need family around you at this critical time.

    Young fathers have to deliberately build a bond with their children: One, by being in the lives of the children from cradle. You cannot jump in after the “food is cooked” (when your children are now adults and successful) and expect to enjoy it. May be that worked in those days, but children these days do not allow that. Two, do not maltreat their mother. If you do, they will pay you back when they are old enough to flex their muscles. Men can argue from now till tomorrow, but the truth is that there is always a natural bond between real mothers (as distinct from agbaya mothers) and their children.

    They carried the pregnancy, breastfed the babies, cleaned them up in the early days and, and there were so many other sacrifices and occasions that necessarily involved bonding between mother and child. You think those bonds and special moments count for nothing? Think again. The bible did admonish children to take care of their parents in old age, but many children these days do things their own way. Even the fabled father-daughter bond is earned, not automatic. But be a good father – not necessarily because of reciprocal expectations in old age – because that is the right thing to do.

    So young upcoming fathers, start laying the foundation of your relationship with your children in old age. Go beyond being a sperm depositor. A real father is a leader, teacher, mentor, provider, friend and protector, etc. The foolishness of yesterday is haunting many old men today, avoid their pitfalls

     

  • BOOK REVIEW: How to avoid pitfalls of legislative plagiarism in Nigeria

    BOOK REVIEW: How to avoid pitfalls of legislative plagiarism in Nigeria

    By Emman Ovuakporie

    THE book Legislative Plagiarism And Infringement of Copyright In Bills And Statutes, is a serial publication under the Legislative Information And Knowledgment Enhancement Series (LIKES).

    A handbook on transplant of bills and statutes, it is a collection of articles written by legal professionals, lawmakers and academics to enhance legislative knowledge in Nigeria.

    The handbook addresses ills associated with plagiarism by legislators and how to avoid the pitfalls while at the same time it ensures that legislations don’t end up with implementation difficulties.

    In the five chapter book, Rep Kingsley Ogundu Chinda, a third-timer in the House of Representatives, leaves no one in doubt as to his mastery in editing. Chapter one was anchored by Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja who clinically handled the Method of Transplanting Bills And Statutes To Prevent Plagiarism And Copyright Infringement.

    Jaja adopted the methodology of Keith Patchett, a professor of law and an expert in legislative drafting at the University of Cardiff, Wales. He espoused a system of legislative drafting that was applied for Eastern and Central European countries.

    The chapter examines how Patchett’s method can be applied in Nigeria’s legislative drafting processes to minimise legislative plagiarism. Giving an insight into how bills are drafted, Jaja likened production of a government’s bill (legislation) to that of a cake production by a firm of bakers, noting that it all depends on the ingredients. He stressed that better quality of ingredients impacts on quality of the cakes.

    He observed that in the absence of indigenous methods of legislative drafting, majority of legislators in developing countries, including Nigeria, now resort to the practice of copying or transplanting of bills and legislations by other developing countries.

    Jaja held the view that poorly drafted statutes were burdens upon the entire state, noting that while judges struggle to interpret and apply them, attorneys find it difficult to base any sure advice upon them, while citizens’ earnest desire to conform is confused.

    In recent times, plagiarism and copyright infringement of bills and statutes have emerged as some of the issues that have resulted in litigation for legislators and the legislature. For example, a former senator recently instituted a law suit against the Infectious Diseases Bill, 2020. The bill was supposedly sponsored by a former speaker in the House of Representatives. Among other allegations, the said bill is said to be plagiarised considering that 98 percent of its contents were copied from the Infectious Diseases Act, 1977 of Singapore.

    In the second chapter, Chukwuka Onyeaku,focused on Legislative Plagiarism in Nigeria: Examining The Legislative Status of Bills And Acts of The Legislature. Onyeaku apparently dug into intellectual property rights adequately using Nigerian Copyright Act as basis to determine what constitutes literary work. The chapter is divided into six sections for easy comprehension. It delves into what can be adjudged plagiarism in the legislative parlance using Nigeria’s Control of Infectious Diseases, 2020 as Nigeria’s legal framework to drive home his point. In concluding the chapter, he noted that under Nigeria’s legal framework it can safely be said that the Singapore Disease Act,1977 cannot be plagiarised because copyright is not attached to bills or Acts.

    In the third chapter, the author examined Consequences of Transplant of Bills, An x-ray of the Senate: Nigerian Health Emergency Bill 2020 And House of Representatives Control of Infectious Diseases 2020 transplanted from the Infectious Disease Act of Singapore 2018. Here, Rep Chinda vividly analysed both bills with sharp comparisons. While commending drafters of both bills, Chinda explaindd, however, that following poor transplanting the bills did not fulfill the spirit and good intentions of the drafters, because the letters of the law were inconsiderately couched or transplanted in a way that the bills do not suit Nigerian realities.

    He argued that it is almost impossible for both bills to have different titles, similar errors and be highly identical. According to him, in reading through both bills, one wonders if the drafters in both legislative chambers were under Pentecostal anointing and inspiration such that both bills could be drafted separately with 95 percent of the sections being verbatim. The look-alike bills displayed so much resemblance that they had no difference. In subsequent paragraphs he outlined all the minor differences and the identical twin-like appearances of the bills which heavily gave credence to the conspiracy theory associated with them.

    He x-rayed the bills in a clause by clause style and listed their distinctive ambiguities and similarities. Abnormalities associated with both bills and the concentration of excessive powers on the director general of NCDC and the Minister of Health were adequately thrashed out in subsequent paragraphs of the book. In his conclusion, Chinda advised drafters of legislations to first and foremost consider the citizens so that they do not end up protecting governments.
    The fourth chapter is devoted to legal practitioner’s view on legislative plagiarism.

    Here, the author, Ekene Chuks-Okeke, examined ethical issues as they related to plagiarism and the way forward using events surrounding recent plagiarised bills as a case study. He cited the event of February 2020 on the floor of the House of Representatives where Hon. Nicholas Ossai reportedly raised an alarm over a Bill he sponsored in 2018 but was allegedly replicated by the Deputy Senate President as Billl on Orogun Polytechnic but without credit. Ossai, however, warned against allowing lawmakers to plagiarise, stressing that since it is not allowed in a university dissertation or a pupil’s assignment it shouldn’t be normalised for lawmakers.

    The last chapter focused on whether Statutes and Literary Works Are Protected By Copyright In Nigeria. The author of this chapter, Bankole Shodipo, presented a tailor-made argument using contemporary examples to buttress his point. He submitted that the only thing that was expressly excluded from the list of literary works was judgment of courts. Law reports are expressly mentioned but court decisions are excluded from the Act. Suffice to say that in most African countries, statutes are not protected by copyright not because they are not literary works but because they are specifically excluded from protection.

    Nigeria is a signatory to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and has incorporated its provisions into the Copyright Act. Article 2(4) of the Berne Convention provides that member States are at liberty to determine the protection to be granted to official texts of a legislative, administrative and legal nature and official translation of such texts.

    In conclusion, the book is a veritable tool for those in search of knowledge on legislative plagiarism and copyright laws. It is recommended for law students, legislative studies students, lawmakers, practicing lawyers and students of political studies. It is a well referenced and easy read book because of its flow.

  • FG, Labour, others reach agreement on five bills to promote workers’ welfare

    FG, Labour, others reach agreement on five bills to promote workers’ welfare

    The Federal Government, labour and employers have reached agreement on five bills to promote workers’ welfare across the country.

    These bills will be submitted to the National Assembly for urgent action.

    The agreement was reached at a three-day retreat in Lagos between March 2 and 4. Held under the auspices of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment in conjunction with the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC; Trade Union Congress, TUC, and Nigeria Employers Consultative Association, NECA, with the International Labour Organisation, ILO, providing technical support, participants at the retreat reviewed national labour bills.

    Labour and Employment Minister, Dr Chris Ngige, declared the retreat open, while Minister of State, Labour and Employment, Olorogun Festus Keyamo (SAN), chaired the technical session.

    There was a joint communiqué by Olorogun Festus Keyamo, Minister of State, Labour and Employment; Ayuba Wabba, NLC president; Quadri Olaleye, TUC President; and Timothy Olawale, Director-General, NECA.

    It said: ”The retreat was for the purpose of updating Nigeria’s labour laws to conform with international best practices and current realities in the world of work.

    “The five national labour bills considered at the three-day retreat were Collective Labour Relations Bill; Labour Standard Bill; Labour \Institutions Bill; Occupational Safety and Health Bill, and the Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund (Amendment) Act.

    ”After intense deliberations on the bills, government and the social partners were able to reach consensus on most of the provisions in the aforementioned bills and would finalise outstanding issues at a validation meeting in Abuja.

    “The final outcome of the exercise would be forwarded to the National Assembly for legislative action.”

  • We won’t pass laws detrimental to Nigeria – Lawan

    We won’t pass laws detrimental to Nigeria – Lawan

    President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan has reassured Nigerians that the ninth National Assembly will not pass any law to the detriment of the country.

    Lawan gave the assurance on Tuesday when members of the Board and Management of the African Independent Television (AIT) paid him a courtesy call in his office.

    The visit was to extend an invitation to the Senate President to a Town Hall meeting planned for next Monday by the organisation on anti-Hate Speech Bill and Social Media Bill pending before the Senate.

    The Senate President said, “I want to assure Nigerians that we are not going to pass any law to the detriment of our country.

    “We love this country and we will do all we can do to ensure there is good governance, that there is orderliness and that citizens have their rights protected”

    He expressed delight on the debate generated by the two bills, saying that, “the reaction of Nigerians tells you that there is democracy in Nigeria and that people are listening to what is happening at the National Assembly.”

    “It is encouraging to hear people expressing their views on these bills.

    “When a member of the National Assembly comes up with a bill, we expect the public to be interested and we will provide the opportunity for the public to come and express their opinions, their views, their support, their objections on the bill.

    “So, when these two bills are scheduled for public hearing, the public will have the opportunity to speak about them and preponderance of opinions, views and ideas by the Nigerians will shape the way forward for the bills”.

    Lawan appealed to those commenting on the bills to be open minded and eschew sentiment to ensure that the bills are treated on their merits.

    “Hate speech in fact has become a big issue across the world, but in our effort to address it as a menace, we have to look at it in a way and manner that the rights of citizens are not tampered with.

    “We cannot close our eyes to undesirable consequences brought about by hate speech and it is for us as a nation to come together and deal with it,” he said.

    Lawan commended the management of AIT for initiating the engagement, saying that it would offer an opportunity to the sponsors of the bills and other senators to provide more clarifications on the contentious areas in the bills.

    Earlier, the Chairman of AIT, Mr. Raymond Dokpesi (Jnr) said the town hall meeting was being organised to provide a platform for stakeholders and other Nigerians to brainstorm on the two bills.

    Dokpesi said the diverse reactions by Nigerians on the bills, particularly the punitive measures they contained prompted the organisation to come up with the idea to find acceptable common ground.