Tag: Campaigns

  • Atiku and Tinubu set to drown Peter Obi in the media – By Mideno Bayagbon

    Atiku and Tinubu set to drown Peter Obi in the media – By Mideno Bayagbon

    By Mideno Bayagbon

    (mideno@thenewsguru.ng)

    As the campaign season officially kicks off, the national space is set to be agog with the noise  of political activities. At the federal level, the three major parties will be parading the Asiwaju, Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu, (APC); Waziri Adamawa, Alhaji  Atiku Abubakar  (PDP); and the gadfly, table shaker, Mr Peter Obi, (LP). They will attempt to sell themselves to the electorate for a chance at Aso Rock, as President. At  the state level, hundreds of candidates will be aspiring to become their state governors. Thousands still will be pounding the cities and villages across the country to be considered for election as Senators, House of Representative members and States House of Assembly members. The die is cast.

    The season of fake promises, barefaced lies, rent-a-crowd rallies, surreal political advertisements to enchant the populace is on us.  Finally, the incompetent and much abused President Muhammadu Buhari, will have a breather. The thunderous political decibels will draw the national focus from him and the many hydra-headed political, economic and social problems which his incompetence has plunged the nation into. With political cash flying around, the critical issues of insecurity, harsh economic realities will take the back burner. For a man who cares only for himself, as he is reputed, President Buhari can sleep better now, go on his extensive health tourism and indeed gallivant all over the world in the remaining months of his better forgotten misrule of Nigeria.

    But unlike other climes where clearly thought out policies, probity of candidates: their character and history, determine who gets elected, the next four months or so, our politicians will take us on a fool’s ride. Leaving the substance of our reality, they will regale us with inanities, with attacks and counter attacks on opposing candidates. We will not know where they stand on most issues because obfuscation will be the tactical order of the  day. The game plan will be to cleverly proffer outlandish solutions to the major problems confronting the country which are the badly managed economy, the wanton insecurity of lives and properties and the many ill-conceived policies of the Buhari government. With vague promises, will come an attitude of we will cross the river when we get there. Peter Barnum’s reputed quote: let the people be fooled will be on full display.

    Strategically, most will avoid occasions and situations where probing questions will be asked of them. It is clear that most of those who will be coming out to canvas our votes have not the faintest idea how to solve the legion of problems bedevilling the country. Of course, in all sincerity, we all know that is not why they are contesting for the positions they are vying for. For most of our politicians, winning an election is  an end in itself; a do-or-die affair because it is their legitimate route to accessing the national wealth and privatizing it to self. It is the openly concealed path for them to dip their grubby fingers into the national cake. It is the ticket to be part of the sharers, not bakers, of the national cake. The only objective, therefore, is to do everything and anything it takes to get pronounced as winner of the particular election.

    Ninety-nine point nine of those, for example, who want to be governors of their states have no idea, no plan other than the wishy washy, glossy and empty headed “manifestoes” which some smart alec consultant has put together for them to wave at whoever cares to ask. Most of them do not know a thing about how to grow their state’s economy or what to do about mobilising their populace for growth and development. Rather, we will hear of such fanciful inanities as youth empowerment which means they will buy some tricycles, some sewing machines, some hair clippers and so on, and pretend that they have done what is required of them for the youths and women. Most will run their governments on some quirk, harebrained suggestions from emergency consultants. Some will end up as governments by proposals. So why would they bother themselves to come  public and convince their electors with well thought out and designed programmes for growth and development? Rigging and vote buying are better options to them.

    At the national level, one would expect that removing the lead on campaigns will afford the three major candidates the opportunity to convince Nigerians why their programmes and policies will be what the country needs now to pluck it out of the slope to infamy. One would expect they will come out to lay bare how they intend to tackle the economy, the multi-pronged insecurity problems and many other problems bedevilling the country. How, for example, do they intend to tackle the power problem? The fuel subsidy imbroglio. This as we all know is the biggest scam in town.

    A notice of the reluctance of the candidates to engage their opponents in debates and in live interviews has already been served by Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu. He told reporters who were asking him to feature in live interviews on television to perish the idea.  As many are beginning to suspect, the Jagaban, because of some yet unannounced ailments, may not be able to engage in rigorous interviews to explain what he stands for. He intends to brag his way through. And we can be sure that a well-planned leeway has been fashioned out by his handlers. We wait and see how they will harangue the populace into quiet acceptance of this.

    His attempt to avoid the public assessment of his current intellectual and physical capabilities may just be the adopted pattern of most of the candidates across the country.

    Four wasted months of bamboozling and filibustering lie ahead. The exception to this, however, might be the Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, whose ambition has been bolstered by the media and the youths who have adopted him as their own. He not only enjoys making the media rounds to canvas his points, he uses the media in ways the two or three other candidates, though green with envy, have avoided so far. Atiku Abubakar though has consented to and  done one major interview to try and explain why he wants to be president may also try his best to avoid interviews and fora where he will be thoroughly examined. That is, apart from the fact the he too, like Tinubu, thinks it is his turn to be president! The man is officially the oldest of the candidates at almost 77 years old currently.

    Nevertheless, the media and internet space are going to play major roles in the coming elections. That perhaps explains why preparatory to the campaigns kicking off, some of the candidates camps have constituted hard nosed, lavishly funded media units, who they expect to go to war on their behalf against their opponents. Most telling of course is the thousands of “internet rats” they have recruited and empowered with electronic gadgets and data. These are people who will be on the social media space 24 hours of the day. They will have two major functions: create as many negative opinion about their opponents, colour them in gory ethnic, religious and other contentious points before the public. They are to also counter every negative write up, even in the remotest of social media platforms, with abusive and insulting personal attacks, confuse the issues with shameless lies and repeat same all so often, and be relentless. In all these, their mission is to position their candidate as the only saint since Jesus Christ. Through their intransigence, and belligerent postures, they are also to try and force people to support their candidates through every gimmick they can muster.

    This is especially so since the youths who are the bulwarks of the Peter Obi campaign are digital natives. These recruited media contractors will match Obi and each other’s supporters word for word, abuse for abuse. Hellish Armageddon is about to be unleashed on our social media space.  For your sanity’s sake, social media is a place to avoid for the whole campaign period.

    As the politicians attempt to destroy themselves while shamelessly avoiding the issues that bedevil the nation, the rest of us, even when we avoid the mayhem in the social media, will still be afflicted by their sound bites, preposterous advertisements full of dance and songs yet telling us little about why we should vote for the particular candidates. With the war chest at the disposal of both the Alhaji Tinubu and Alhaji Abubakar, a lot of media spend is envisaged. Obi and Kwankwaso, with their lean financial base will be easily outspent in this game to fully overwhelm, deceive and win over the electorate. Atiku Abubakar and Ahmed Tinubu will own the paid media space and will drown out Obi and all the other contenders.

    How this old tactics will hold in the face of current realities is left to be seen.

  • Recommended: Sleepless months ahead for the NBC – By Okoh Aihe

    Recommended: Sleepless months ahead for the NBC – By Okoh Aihe

    Today, a new political journey into the future begins for this country. But let’s do a recall. It may not be total. My friend once told me a story, long ago, which still makes my heart bleed. In one of those satanic periods after the elections in Nigeria, there was conflagration up north, and lots of killings, provoked by the utterances of a former leader of the nation, a contestant, who thought he had lost everything and would never have the opportunity again. This former leader cried for power. The rest as they say is not good history.

    In those dark moments, a father so concerned about the safety of the daughter on Youth Service – serving the nation – was calling her phone consistently. Now you never knew that a phone call could be answered from hell. That day hell was in Kaduna. Some demonic entity simply picked up the phone and asked: “Is this your daughter? I just killed her now.”

    News of the daughter’s death has been broken to him. Just like that!

    Welcome to elections in Nigeria. The story has hardly changed. Desperadoes send their agents to kill and destroy while they wait to enjoy the spoils of office they hardly deserve. They swim through the blood of the innocent to get to power and they imagine that blood will depart from their lineage, forever.

    Ever since some stakeholders have been concerned about election safety in the country. Those whose regulatory activities and demeanour could affect the conduct of elections, even on ancillary scale, have had to dust up their regulatory documents to stay on top of the dangerous game that is politics in Nigeria.

    The National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) is one of those organisations, and this is not a time of the year I envy those who work in that establishment. Originally designed to regulate broadcasting, it has found out that regulation includes a lot of things, including managing the strange expectations of the government. Fortunately, this agency has tried so hard. There are some rites of passage that must lead to election – a time with broadcasters, to appeal to them about the contents of broadcasting, including advertising; the need to be fair to all political parties – although NTA, Radio Nigeria and state broadcast stations don’t understand the meaning of that fairness, fake news, the dangers of hate speech, and why really the operators must play by the Code.

    Yes. There is The Nigeria Broadcasting Code which agglomerates all those things and has a comprehensive compilation of dos and don’ts.

    For it’s tradition and also by way of pouring libation on those electoral rites, the NBC has appealed to broadcasters not to use their stations to promote hate, violence and chaos as this electoral phase unfolds. Speaking at a sensitisation programme in Lagos, titled: Towards a fair and responsible broadcast coverage of the 2023 general elections: a multi-stakeholder dialogue, Mallam Balarabe Shehu Ilelah, the Director General, threatened to evoke the contents of the Code to deal with broadcasters who go on the wrong side of the law.

    He urged broadcasters to provide equal distribution of airwaves for jingles and programmes throughout their peak period while appealing that they must act responsibly

    “Things won’t go on as usual. The dissemination of false information, hate speech, and disparaging remarks must stop on broadcast media. We must advocate for nonviolence rather than violence, educate rather than misinform, and defend rather than dismantle society,” Ilelah called out.

    On this wise, we agree with NBC. This nation is on a tinderbox or right at the edge of a precipice, with the fuel supplied by a government with absolute disdain for fairness or balance. Just a little spark of fire or a little shove, the nation will either be on a massive fire that cannot be controlled or simply keel over. Either way the nation is nearing the very end because of one government’s failure. The broadcasters need not exacerbate by their actions. The issue of fine doesn’t excite us here because it is better for it not to happen than for sanctions to be pursued.

    The 6the Edition of the Nigeria Broadcast Code is very clear on this, depending upon the version you have. Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 under Professional Rules deal with this very lucidly but let’s stay with 3.1.2, which says: “Broadcasting shall promote human dignity, therefore hate speech is prohibited. The Broadcaster shall not transmit any programme, programme promotion, community service announcement or station identity, which is likely, in any circumstance, to provoke or perpetuate in a reasonable person, intense dislike, serious contempt or severe ridicule against a person or groups of people because of age, colour, gender, national or ethnic origin, disability, race, religion or political leanings.”

    This is articulately expressed but I wish to appeal that in the matter of a breach which should be very clear, the NBC should follow the stipulated process of meting out discipline to the erring station instead of being coerced into knee-jerk punitive action by personalities in government.

    The regulator should earn believability. What happened when the list of broadcasters owing license fees was released, shouldn’t happen again. Quite a few people believe that the names of Federal Government stations were deracinated with attention focussed on a few private stations the regulator wanted to embarrass. So truth was carefully laced in deceit and programmed obscurantism.

    I am however more concerned with equal treatment to the various stakeholders, the political parties, in terms of equal opportunity to the broadcast space. There have been complaints in the past where government stations – federal and state – did not accept news materials or even adverts from opposition parties. Revenues that should accrued to the government and, by extension the people, were rejected because some people in government wouldn’t bear to see some faces, especially if they were labelled as enemies.

    Yet the Code says in Section 9.3.1. The Public Service Broadcasters (PSB) shall: (a) ensure that programmes and news broadcasts reflect the divergent view points and plural nature of the Nigerian society; (b) give all sides equitable time to air their views; and (c) not accept political adverts but may cover campaign rallies of all registered political parties and give equal airtime for broadcast of same.

    With particular reference to the beauty of the Code, there are no small parties and no big parties. All the political parties are equal before the Code. This is why I believe the NBC has a lot of responsibility on its shoulders in the days and months ahead. The organisation should empower the Monitoring Department to play its role. Apart from encouraging good broadcasting that can promote peace, awareness and the health of the society in the days ahead, the Department should be equipped well enough to perform at such an elevated level as to enable the NBC confront broadcasters with wrong judgment of facts or plain mischief. In the next few months, I appeal, there should be no sleep for the NBC.

  • APC postpones kick-off of presidential campaign indefinitely

    APC postpones kick-off of presidential campaign indefinitely

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council has postponed the kick-off of its campaigns earlier scheduled to hold on Wednesday, September 28.

    The Director-General, of the Tinubu/Shettima Presidential Campaign Council and Governor of Plateau State, Simon Lalong disclosed this in a statement on Tuesday, September 27.

    According to him, the adjustment of the timetable and schedule of activities is in order to accommodate growing interests shown by various political tendencies in being party of the campaign council. He mentioned that a new date for the kick-off would be announced soon.

    The statement reads “Recall that we had earlier earmarked a peace walk and prayers for Wednesday, September 28, 2022, to  officially kick-off our campaigns for the 2023 Presidential Elections. We had also announced that the members of the Campaign Council report at the Campaign Headquarters on that day to collect their letters of appointments.

    “However, due to the expansion of the list to accommodate more stakeholders and interests within the APC family, we have decided to adjust the time-table of these activities in order to ensure everyone is on board before activities officially commence. Consequently, the activities earlier announced for the 28th of September will no longer hold.

    “As the ruling and most attractive party in Nigeria, we understand the sacrifices and understanding of our teeming members who are more than willing to volunteer themselves for this great task ahead. It also shows the enormous love that the party members have for our candidates.

    “A new date and time-table of events will be announced soon”.

  • INEC rolls out guidelines for campaigns

    INEC rolls out guidelines for campaigns

    The Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) in Kwara has issued the guidelines on the commencement of campaigns for the 2023 general election.

    The Resident Electoral Commissioner, Malam Garba Attahiru, announced this on Monday in Ilorin during a stakeholders meeting.

    Attahiru, who was represented by the INEC Administrative Secretary, Mr Julius Yagba, said that 14 activities have bernsuccesfully implemented, as INEC published the final list of nominated candidates on Sept. 20, 2022.

    He said the next activity in line is the commencement of campaigns by the political parties on Sept. 28. He added that the meeting was designed to remind all stakeholders about the responsibilities and expectations during the carnpaigns for various offices.

    According to him, the offices of the President and National Assembly campaigns will start on Sept. 28, and the Governorship and State House of Assembly is on Oct.12.

    “Relying on Section 92 of the Electoral Act, 2022, the commission expects the political campaigns to be civil, devoid of abusive language and without any rancour.

    “Section 92 of the Electoral Act 2022 forbids any political campaign or slogan tainted with abusive language directly or indirectly or one likely to injure religious, ethnic, tribal or sectional feelings.

    “Therefore abusive, intemperate, slanderous or base language or insinuations or innuendoes intended or iikely to provoke violent reactions or emotion should be avoided.

    “Parties and candidates are to avoid training or enlisting the services of individuals or groups, e.g. masquerades, for the purpose of adopting physical force or coercion in a manner likely to arouse apprehension during campaigns,” the REC said.

    He therefore warned politicians against the use of armed private security organisations during campaigns or election processions.

    He also enjoined political parties and their candidates to comply with these provisions as contravening them will attract sanctions.

    He said that any political party, aspirant or candidate who contravened Section 92 of the Act would be fined N1 million or 12 months imprisonment.

    He however said a political party that contravened the provision of Section 92 would be fined N2 million and N1 million for any subsequent offence.

    He said further that any candidate or aspirant who equipped any person or group to display physical force commit an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine of N500,000 or three years imprisonment.

    He urged the Nigeria Police Force and other security agencies to monitor the campaign process as well as ensure efficient and effective deployment of personnel for peaceful electioneering.

  • Do campaigns have to be bloody to win? – By Azu Ishiekwene

    Do campaigns have to be bloody to win? – By Azu Ishiekwene

    If this were a compulsory exam question, a number of politicians would simply answer: it depends. On what? On what is at stake. What the opponent does and how. And, of course, how far the resources of the one at the receiving end can go to exact revenge, sometimes in spite of the rules.

    As campaigns for the 2023 general elections in Nigeria begin, everything is at stake. From the office of representatives in state houses of assembly to the positions of 28 governors, 469 national lawmakers, and the president.

    In all, about 1,520 positions are up for election and for the first time, Muhammadu Buhari who has been president for nearly eight years and a contestant in all elections in the last nearly 20, would not be on the ballot for what is perhaps the most consequential office.

    The stakes to play for are not only high, they are dangerously seductive for two contenders – the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential candidate, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar – two deep pockets who may well be taking their last shot at the nation’s top job.

    The real world is not a periodic exam hall. Nowhere is the ferocity of contest keener than in political campaigns, such as we’re about to commence. It’s a grisly mess of interests, of wheeling and dealing, and continuous cloak and dagger entanglements worse than the binary choices often present in an examination.

    A 2018 report by Daily Trust quoted the INEC chairman, Professor Yakubu Mohmood, as saying that for N242 billion, the 2019 election was the most expensive ever. That is excluding expenses by candidates, parties and individuals. The next one might beat that record.

    If only it were possible to see the arsenal of Nigeria’s political parties – especially the major ones – on the eve of the commencement of campaigns for the 2023 general elections. I would not be surprised if they have stockpiled enough weapons to give either Russia or Ukraine a decisive advantage in the ongoing conflict in Europe.

    It’s not a laughing matter. If morning shows the day, the pre-flag off skirmishes among not just supporters but even the campaign team members of the APC, the PDP, and the Labour Party (LP) show that we could be in for a season of blood sport.

    Recent exhibits, of course, include the feisty exchanges between APC’s Femi Fani-Kayode and PDP’s Dino Melaye. Anyone with the heart to read either of their recent messages to the end risked exposure to post-traumatic stress.

    With PDP’s relentless Reno Omokri in the wings, the APC media team led by formidable warriors like Dele Alake, Bayo Onanuga and Festus Keyamo, among others, and the LP’s army of social media avatars at daggers drawn, we’ll have to double down on luck to have a normal campaign season.

    But what does history teach, really? Is all the talk about issues-based campaigns wishful thinking? With all to play for, is it realistic to expect bloodless campaigns? And in any case, if winning often matters more than anything else in politics, do normal campaigns win?

    Normal campaigns may be desirable. They may even have worked at some point in Athens or Ancient Rome. Yet, Shakespeare’s Julius Caesaris a constant reminder of the world’s long and futile journey to political amity.

    Mass communication tools and their widespread adoption have fuelled the flames and compounded the misery of pacifists hoping for a day of decency in political campaigns. Also, we have seen from the 2015 performance of Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, that social media can be both a facilitator and a big danger to elections.

    But perhaps there are exceptions, however imperfect, from which our politicians could take a leaf in the days ahead?

    Despite his disability, for example, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the US ran what presidential historians consider some of the most successful campaigns. In spite of the daunting odds of the Great Depression, FDR ran a campaign in 1932 that ended four decades of Republican dominance, a feat that he sustained and repeated back-to-back in three subsequent terms. His theme song, “Happy days are here again”, became his party’s anthem.

    How a man stricken with polio at 39 could have done it was in part a result of the genius of his message which offered despairing voters a “New Deal” after the famished years of Republican rule, and partly also as a result of the understanding of the press not to highlight his disability, which frankly, would be a miracle today.

    The point is that the only US President who ruled for an unprecedented four terms ran largely issues-based campaigns and won, in spite of his disability. And to think that he had in his corner, the warmonger and one of America’s most notorious publishers, Williams Randolph Hearst, whom he could have pressed to dishonorable ends!

    US Presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan also showed how even in the age of the TV, focusing on issues and connecting with people can make a difference in election campaigns.

    And perhaps the most electrifying in the recent history of US campaigns has been Barack Obama, an extraordinary mobiliser and charming politician whose wife, Michelle, said in spite of all the garbage thrown at Obama by Hillary Clinton’s bullies in 2016, “when they go low, we go high.”

    Newly elected Kenyan President William Ruto also provides an example of how to run a difficult campaign without always being nasty. In spite of his supporters getting trashed and the few he recommended as cabinet members being targets of Uhuru Kenyatta witch hunt, Ruto harped on how the government’s anti-corruption war had lost its way.

    While his main opponent mocked and called him an “irresponsible young man deceiving Kenyans with fake promises”, Ruto’s campaign responded by providing a roadmap of how he would tackle the country’s 40 percent youth unemployment. He spun a legend that he was a “hustler”, just like the ordinary people, and not a member of the corrupt, grasping dynasty.

    MKO Abiola’s Hope ‘93 was also, in many respects, exemplary and a number of the current actors played important roles in it. In comparison with the National Republican Convention (NRC), Abiola’s Social Democratic Party (SDP) was imaginative, folksy and down-to-earth. Abiola showed a forlorn, divided country that it was possible to believe again.

    Since the military railroaded President Olusegun Obasanjo back to office in 1999, our political campaigns have been anything but inspiring. Obasanjo, both a creature and mastermind of this new era, poignantly described it as a “do-or-die” affair.

    As the blatant lies, fake promises and dark schemes of politicians have come back to haunt them, a number of them begotten of this season seem determined to return to their natural habitat – the mud.

    Yet, voters will have to decide whether or not to join them there. Voters who indulge the demagoguery of politicians, who choose to cheer them on as they kick the leg instead of the ball, cannot blame anyone when charlatans run their lives for another four years.

    President Muhammadu Buhari, like those before him, has repeatedly promised free and fair elections. But that, quite honestly, is not his job. It is the duty of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to see to it and the responsibility of citizens to hold the Commission’s feet to the fire.

    Civil society and the press can also help with the most important question of any election campaign – how? They can help not only to remind voters of what is important and insist that politicians play by the rules, but also by constantly demanding that the umpire, INEC, should monitor and enforce its own rules.

    Campaigns matter because they can help to activate voter interest and also underline the fundamental issues, which for Nigeria, includes security, the state of the economy or where partisan or group interests may lie.

    As Gary Jacobson said in his article, “How do campaigns matter?”, published in the May 2015 issue of the Annual Review of Political Science, “The question is not whether campaigns matter, but where, when, for what and for whom they matter.”

    The supply side has let us down badly, offering mostly transient amusement, vile abuse or downright bogus promises. It’s time to demand something more than empty promissory notes. Something we can hold onto the morning after this seasonal charm offensive has gone.

     

    Ishiekwene is the Editor-In-Chief of LEADERSHIP

  • Election postponement: PDP dares INEC, insists on reopening campaigns

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) says it is set to reopen its campaign following the postponement of the presidential and National Assembly elections by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Recall that INEC had on Saturday postponed the presidential and National Assembly elections from February 16 to 23. State elections were also postponed from March 2 to 9.

    The INEC chairman, Mahmood Yakubu, had on Saturday at a press briefing said campaigns remain stopped for the elections as they had been since last Friday.

    The electoral law states that campaigns should end a day to the election. With the postponement, campaigns should continue until next Friday, the PDP argues.

    The party made this known in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Kola Ologbondiyan, on Sunday evening.

    Ologbondiyan said the party rejects the wrongful administrative prohibition of campaigns by INEC.

    He said the directive is directly in conflict with the provision of the Electoral Act and is not backed by any other law in the country.

    Our position is predicated on the clear provision of section 99 (1) of the Electoral Act which stipulated that “for the purposes of this Act, the period of campaigning in public by every political party shall commence 90 days before polling day and end 24 hours prior to that day,” Ologbondiyan said.

    The clear import of this provision, in the current situation, is that given the postponement of the election to February 23, 2019, the 24 hours requirement for closure of all public campaigning falls at midnight of February 21.”

    He said whenever INEC’s administrative pronouncement conflicts with the Electoral Act, such administrative pronouncement must bow before the law.

    He charged INEC to be appropriately guided and directed its members to await further directives ahead of the reopening of its campaign.

    Recall that the APC national chairman, Adams Oshiomhole had earlier made similar statement.

    It is however not clear as at press time if the other parties will follow suit.

  • 2019: No more campaigns, collection of PVCs – INEC

    2019: No more campaigns, collection of PVCs – INEC

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says there is no more room for political campaign or collection of the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) in spite of the postponement of elections dates by one week.

    The Chairman of INEC, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, made the disclosure while fielding questions at the commission’s meeting with stakeholders, on Saturday in Abuja.

    Yakubu said that the deadline for the collection of PVCs and elections campaign by political parties according to election timetable has passed.

    “Campaign closed on Thursday, Feb. 14, and for the period that remain campaign remained closed.

    “All the other process that remain in the main timetable remain closed including the collection of PVC, except the conduct of the elections,” he said.

    On why the commission did not consult party leaders before adjusting the dates of the elections, Yakubu said that it was due to the urgency and that Section 36 of the Electoral Act empowered the commission to do so.

    “We have to take a decision and communicate because polls were suppose to open at 8a.m. and we took the decision at 2a.m,” he said.

    Yakubu while answering question on why the commission waited till about 3a.m on Saturday before postponing the elections, said that up till 2a.m the commission was still hopeful that elections would hold as scheduled.

    On whether the commission has enough fund should the elections be postponed again, Yakubu said that INEC was not complaining, adding that the commission do not intend to postpone any of the elections again.

    On request that INEC should compensate political parties for the change in dates, Yakubu said that INEC did not finance parties.

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Mr Adams Oshiomole, expressed displeasure that INEC waited till last few hour before announcing the postponement to Nigerians, demanding the apology of Yakubu to Nigerians and political parties.

    He said the postponement entailed huge loss to political parties who had no public fund to fall on like INEC, saying if the postponement was done on time, loss and inconveniences to political parties would have been avoided.

    “Serious inconveniences has been caused, Nigerians have been subjected to rude shock and I fell extremely cold.

    “I think we should be honest. I am shocked, disappointed and disgusted.

    “The real question I will insist, Mr Chairman by all due respect, is to tell us why by Wednesday you did not announce the postponement, since you acknowledged that the weather was bad.

    “You should have taken all these into account and announced this postponement at least 48 hours before the elections time, so that political parties don’t have to mobilise resources across 176,000 Polling units.

    “Observer will stay where they were and a lot of inconveniences would have been saved,” Oshiomole said.

    Representing the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Mr Osita Chidoka, former Aviation Minister and Chairman, Strategy Committee of the PDP Presidential Campaign Council, commended decision of the commission for not allowing the experienced challenges to lead to staggered elections.

    Chidoka, requested for INEC assurance that Activate Technologies Limited, one of the companies producing the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs), would not be involved in the retrieval and reconfiguration of card readers to be used for the rescheduled elections.

    He said that available information was that the Managing Director of of the company was a senatorial candidate of APC in Niger State.

    He also requested that the commission should allow independent verification that sensitive materials to be retrieved to the CBN had not been opened or tampered with.

    The National Chairman, Progressive People’s Alliance (PPA), Chief Peter Ameh, said initially he was angered that INEC did not consult political parties like it was being done before change of election date in the past.

    Ameh, who is also the National Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Committee (IPAC), however, said that with the explanation by INEC Chairman, it was clear that the decision was taken in the interest of the nation.

    The News Agency of Nigeria(NAN) reports that INEC had shifted the Presidential and National Assembly elections from Feb. 16 to Feb. 23 and the Governorship and State House of Assembly elections from March 2 to March 9.

  • 2019: I wont divert public funds to run APC campaigns, Buhari assures Nigerians

    2019: I wont divert public funds to run APC campaigns, Buhari assures Nigerians

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday reiterated his commitment to the elimination of corruption in campaign financing, saying he will not authorise the use of funds from the public treasury for his re-election campaign.

    Buhari spoke after of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting.

    The President directed Council members to take advantage of technology to reach out to voters on the need to return the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led administration in the forthcoming general elections.

    In a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, the President said: “As political parties spread their ideologies and views to every nook and cranny of the country, the issue of cash payment to voters and its corrupting influence in electioneering has once again become a topical issue.

    Try and use text and multi-media messages to seek votes for the party and government. There is no money from the treasury for use in the campaigns. I will not authorise that,” he said.

    President Buhari declared that the APC-led administration has a clear development agenda best suited to take Nigeria forward and sustain economic development.

    He was quoted as saying: “This message needs to be taken to all Nigerians but we cannot use money from the treasury to share out to prospective voters.

    Nigerians want change and we alone can deliver that change. Our people can no longer be swayed by money politics.”

    The President also used the occasion, which was a valedictory session for the Minister of State, Foreign Affairs, Hajiya Khadija Bukar Abba Ibrahim, to wish her success in her electoral contest.

    The minister had signified her desire to leave the cabinet, in line with existing regulations, to run for a legislative seat in her native Yobe State.

     

  • Stop campaigning for 2019 elections, Saraki warns politicians

    Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki has warned politicians in the country to henceforth stop their subtle campaigns for the 2019 elections.

    The Senate President noted that it was insensitive of elected political office holders to abandon serious issues of serving their constituents and preoccupy themselves with the 2019 elections.

    Saraki noted that 2019 was still a long period for serious-minded politicians to concentrate their energy on to the detriment of good governance.

    He admitted that elected public office holders had not met some of the expectations of Nigerians, adding that they should rather be committed to rendering services and fulfilling their electoral promises.

    The Senate President stated this on Sunday during an interactive session with newsmen in Ilorin, Kwara State.

    Saraki stated, “The year 2019 is a long way. Any serious-minded politician, who is interested in his people, should not be talking about 2019, especially if we want to be honest with ourselves; some of the expectations of our people have not been met. I think it will be insensitive if we have left that and we are now talking about 2019. We need to work hard to make sure that we meet those expectations.

    The economy is already moving in the right direction, which is why we are addressing the issue of security, which is good. We are fighting corruption; we need to do more in that area. By the time we work tremendously over the next one year, I think we will be in a place where we can beat our chest and say we have done well.”

    Saraki added that though financial autonomy for local government areas might be approved during the ongoing constitutional review, it would be more desirable for the LGAs to be adequately funded to address their statutory responsibilities.

    According to him, the current allocations to the local governments in the country are not adequate to meet their needs.

    He said it might be desirable to reduce the burdens of the councils such as education, which he said would be better handled by the state government.

    Saraki stated that without the support of state governments, about 95 per cent of local governments in the country would not be able to pay salaries, talk less of providing infrastructure.

    He said, “The finances are not just there. All the 36 states cannot be doing something wrong. I do not think there is a place where the revenues of the LGs can meet their expenditure, despite that they still have responsibilities like primary education.

    We need to review that. Maybe we will go back and look at whether state governments should truly take over primary education, because the arm of government that cannot even meet administrative expenses, you now put on it a very important sector as education.

    There must be something structurally wrong with it and we need to put our heads together and take decisions on the way forward. Maybe we need to review what kind of responsibilities they have.”