Tag: China

  • China’s communist party at 100: Heralding the Age of China – Chidi Amuta

    China’s communist party at 100: Heralding the Age of China – Chidi Amuta

    Chidi Amuta

    At the age of 27, young Mao Tse Tung travelled the long route from his native Hunan province to attend the inaugural Congress of the Communist Party in Shanghai. The date was July 23rd ,1921. From this week and for the next couple of days, the world will witness a series of events to mark the 100th anniversary of the birth of China’s Communist Party. One factor justifies the elaborate ceremonies and pageants of self adulation. Here is a political party that has birthed the world’s only emerging super power in the 21st century. With a membership of less than 95 million in a nation of 1.389 billion people, the party has the distinction of having been in absolute control of China’s state and society for a century.

    On the scale of the age of parties, hundred years places the Communist Party in the middle age of great parties of the world. Here is the select ranking: America’s Democratic Party(193 yrs), the Republican Party (167 yrs), UK’s Tory Party(186 yrs), the Labour Party(121 yrs), India’s Bharatiya Janata Party(41 yrs) and South Africa’s African National Congress (109 yrs). Therefore, as the fireworks light up the skies over Beijing and other Chinese cities this week in commemoration of the Centennial of the Communist Party, it is only proper that we reflect on the significance of the survival and achievements of the oldest communist party in the world.

    By a curious ruse and practical intent, the world is strolling into what we may describe as the ‘age of China’. The nation that is the undisputed source of the Corona Virus also happens to be the dominant force in the world’s material culture. Nearly everything that supports our daily life – computers, cell phones, textiles, television sets and processed food items- has significant Chinese input. Worldwide, relations with China dominate political discourse. Trade with China is now the prime preoccupation of the World Trade Organization just as the Chinese threat is the most important long term strategic preoccupation of major military powers from the US to Russia and even the United Kingdom. The influx of Chinese students has become a key feature of campus life in leading universities across the world. In the developing world especially Africa, China’s presence is fast replacing the that of other parts of the world. For the first time in human history, Mandarin is the single most sought after new language in the curriculum of schools and colleges. Nearly all the indices of great power emergence are on display in the rise of China.

    Not only has the Communist Party endured for a century, it has largely maintained its cohesiveness and identity. It has in tandem been running the affairs of the world’s largest nation and most consequential autocracy. In China’s Leninist one-party polity, the party is the state and the state is the source and repository of all power and authority. It has regulated and controlled the pattern of political representation, the discipline and code of conduct of public officials as well as the pattern of social life of the citizenry.

    The Communist Party must be credited with China’s current success streak in its totalitarian grip and control of the Chinese state and society. With a predominantly Leninist socialist ideology, the Communist party dictates everything. It decides and controls everything from national defense and security to foreign and domestic affairs, science and technology policy and even the size of families and the limits of free speech and individual freedom.

    The Communist Party has succeeded as China’s engine of political control and policy warehouse. A nation that addresses itself and the world in Mandarin has come to dominate discourse of world affairs in nearly every language. The just concluded G7 Summit in the United Kingdom as well as the NATO Summit in Brussels were dominated by the threat of China as the looming rival of every significant power bloc.

    In less than a century, China has emerged from relative obscurity to the pinnacle of global pre-eminence. From a predominantly peasant economy with a huge population of people living in abject poverty in a disease infested environment, China has become the home of the fastest growing middle class in human history and sea of prosperity. It has become the world’s second largest economy with far too many technological and scientific firsts and dominance of nearly every sphere of national attainment. While the age of miracles used to feature more in the zone of biblical fairy tales, today’s real life achievements of China in a relatively short space of time approximates the realm of miracles. It is the triumph of human will and focused governance over the predicaments that daunt other great nations and hold our common humanity hostage.

    As we speak, China’s economy has grown by an unbelievable average of 18% in the first half of 2021 in the immediate post-Covid period. A fortnight ago, China recorded the vaccination of 1 billion citizens against the Covid-19 virus. It has recorded the miraculous feat of migrating an annual average of 79 million of its citizens from poverty, having freed 790 million from poverty in 10 years. China has a foreign reserve of 3.3 trillion US dollars and the largest standing army (2.2 million active and 500,000 reservists) in the world. China’s huge manufacturing and export power has placed it in the forefront of world trade which it uses to advance its diplomatic interests around the world.

    All this is in addition to a phenomenal spate of infrastructure transformations. Thousands of kilometers of state of the art highways and railroads have crisscrossed all parts of China just as high speed trains carry millions of passengers around the expanse of this large country. New airports in major cities have sprang up to connect most parts of mainland China with cities in the rest of the country and elsewhere in the world. Rows of multi modern apartment blocks have sprang up to house millions of former rural and slum dwellers in sparkling new cities where slums used to hold people hostage in miserable dwellings. A massive industrialization revolution has meant the mass migration of people from the rural to urban areas to fill industrial jobs in factories owned mostly by global multinationals attracted initially by China’s initial low cost labour.

    China’s phenomenal growth has translated into a global influence that is now hard to ignore. Over and above Russia which poses mostly a strategy military threat to the West, China presents a total threat that cuts across the military, economic, diplomatic and even cultural spheres.

    While superintending this phenomenal development frenzy, the Communist Party has itself withstood challenges and internal turbulence without losing its internal coherence and firm hold on the machinery of government and the dynamics of society. It has thus traced the entire trajectory of the history of China, weathering crises and turbulence from the revolution to the era of unbridled communist rule. It has supervised the various post -Mao reforms and guided the nation up to the present era of state controlled free market regime ethos. Through all of these, the Communist party has survived as a stabilizing political force, constantly course correcting along China’s historic path. It has guided the process of nation building, the moulding of a distinctive national identity and the formulation of policies to adapt China to changing circumstances in the world. To have kept over a billion people faithful to its communist ideology in spite of massive economic prosperity and diversification of perspectives and powerful external influences is in itself a measure of the strength and resilience of the Party and the succession of governments it has continued to inspire and guide.

    It has not all been a smooth easy ride. There have been anxious moments and trying chapters. The Communist Party has itself been buffeted by winds of corruption and dissidence from within. But the party survived and ensured that China also survived. It weathered the storm of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the demise of international socialism with its own communist identity in tact. Even so, the party also had the onerous task of managing China’s survival of the turbulence of the post –Mao era with the purges and trials of the Gang of Four.

    Faced with the challenge of the triumph of the liberal international order and global capitalism, the Communist Party had the resilience to oversee the transformation of China from a pure form centrally planned communist economy to a free market state controlled economy with all the implicit systemic contradictions.

    Ordinarily, that world historic transformation would have led to a dilution of the communist ideology of the party and a weakening of the strict one party control of the Communist Party. The Soviet Communist Party did not survive the chaotic experience of multi party democracy in the wake of Gorbachev’s reforms. The result was the demise of the Soviet Union and the independence of its multiple component republics. China was saved this plight by largely homogenous ethnic and national character and the rigidity of its peculiar Leninist order.

    Intriguingly, China has managed to remain under strict communist rule in spite of its astronomical economic success and the emergence of an affluent middle class. Ordinarily, economic prosperity should lead to pressure for greater freedom and political liberty. Such pressure, though muted, is evident but has not translated into a mass popular democratic movement. This is precisely because the prevailing communist order is able to guarantee a relatively good life to a fairly even spread of citizens. Above all, it remains ready to crush even the faintest stirrings of popular revolt.

    Ideological rigidity and pervasive control contain China’s major weakness. Observers in the liberal democratic West have consistently criticized China’s draconian limitations of individual freedoms of expression and liberty. The general routine crackdowns on dissidents, opposition politicians and intellectuals as well as the suppression of the rights of ethnic minorities have remained the butt of global criticism of China’s human rights record.

    For a long time, China’s propaganda machinery has struggled under the burden of Western insistence that China could crumble under its internal autocracy. Of recent, however, major embarrassing episodes such as the Trump inspired January 6th 2021 invasion of the US Capitol have equipped the Chinese propaganda machinery to retort that it is the West and its liberal order that are actually in foreseeable decline.

    However, the existence of a free and democratic Hong Kong and a semi autonomous Taiwan pose major challenges to the resilience of the Communist Party. With the peculiar historical origins of these two outposts, the Communist Party has to learn how to balance the Communist ethos of mainland China with two wealthy, powerful and semi autonomous outposts under its sovereign control.

    Even on this celebratory occasion, China’s hilarious mood cannot be total. It now has an ageing population with the attendant high costs of healthcare and old age benefits. Foreign manufacturers initially attracted by low labour costs are beginning to exit as workers demand higher wages. Unemployment in urban areas is increasing. Prosperity has emboldened more freedom of expression and therefore political dissidence. The Communist Party has its work well cut out in the years ahead.

    If indeed China was beginning to soften under the pressure of the international liberal order, that trend has recently been reversed with the emergence of Xi Jiping as leader. Under the inscrutable Xi, China is witnessing a major resurgence as a techno-autocratic state. Xi has returned to Maoist orthodoxy anchored on a feeling that China is constantly besieged by internal and external enemies. He has returned to a national fixation with secrecy and a desire to regulate everything. He is embarking on a new spate of endless re-education and rectification and an insistence that the ‘party controls the gun’. Xi has renewed the Communist Party’s belief that you do not get the best of people when you allow them unlimited freedom. Instead, almost every aspect of human life requires oversight and intervention. In his steely fascination with control, Xi is readying China for a global role but as a strong world power. He has signaled this role by removing the term limit on his tenure. His speech a few days ago to mark the CCP centenary celebrations is a clear indication of this new direction.

    China under the Communist Party has recorded impressive development in the last hundred years. The next hundred years may be defined by the struggle to manage the precarious consequences of prosperity and global pre eminence. China’s emergence as a global power is not coming in a vacuum. The United States remains the world’s pre-eminent super power and will do everything to remain on top.

    This means that henceforth, China’s every move in strategic spheres will be marked. That is already happening in the military and economic spheres. China’s military presence in the Asia Pacific region has become a challenge to the US’s prior strategic advantages in the Asia Pacific region. Specifically, the increasing expansion of Chinese Influence in the South China Sea, including the building of a military base and forward operational air base island, has become a major strategic concern for Washington in recent years. Similarly, China’s relations with its neighbors especially India has come under greater scrutiny and could inspire an alliance of nations bound by the perception of China as a common enemy. Similarly, trade and tariff policies targeted at curtailing China’s advantages will increase among the United States and its allies including the European Union and Japan. Clearly, then, the next hundred years will see China struggling with the consequences of great power arrival, contest and global importance.

    In its newfound prosperity and economic eminence, China has found a new voice and unique stature in the world and is forging ahead to press its advantages in many regions of the world. In Africa, for instance, China has become the source of new credits mostly for infrastructure development. This development is coming at a time when aid and support from the West have become severely constrained. Chinese credit and investment in Africa may be coming at concessionary rates but the long term drawbacks have begun to show up in the inability of some African countries to abide by the small prints of some of these agreements. Overall, China is relentlessly pushing ahead to position itself as a friend of Africa. The most illustrious testimony of this public relations stunt is China’s donation of the new headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa, an edifice that has however been serving as a listening post for Chinese intelligence on Africa’s diplomatic communications.

    For us in Nigeria, the relevance of the looming Age of China resides in our increasing national weakness and vulnerability to decisions made elsewhere in the world. Although we may not want to be directly concerned with what happens in China, the decisions that are taken in the chambers of China’s Communist Party in Beijing are likely to fundamentally affect the lives and livelihood of Nigerians who find their government increasingly entangled with seductive loans from China for railroad and airport development and expansion.

    More directly, the critical questions that ought to worry us as we felicitate with the Chinese on the centennial of the Communist Party are deeply embedded in our own quirky political party system. Irrespective of ideology, can we develop a democracy through the vehicle of our ‘seasonal’ political parties? Can political parties with brief life spans be vehicles for lasting national development? Can parties that define themselves in terms of limited personal ambitions, narrow group interests and transient objectives be relied upon to build a nation in perpetuity or achieve inclusive development?

    China’s Communist Party is older than the modern Chinese state. Is there any Nigerian political party that is half the age of the Nigerian nation state?

  • Chinese Communist Party Centenary: Remoulding the world in its image, By Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa

    IT was Monday, November 5, 2018. I was engaged in my favourite past time whenever I visit China; climbing the Great Wall. Below it, the country sprawled and you could have a bird’s eye view.

    As I write, I have the feeling that as the compass Communist Party of China, CPC clocks a hundred years this July 1, 2021, China is standing on an elevation like the Great Wall, viewing the world and thinking how to remould it, possibly, in its own image.

     

    The country is one of the most battered in history. When it resisted being force-fed on opium by the colonialists, the British in 1839,battered it to submission and in 1841, took Hong Kong as a war booty which it kept for 156 years.

    Unlike other territories directly colonised by single powers or countries, China was too large to be colonised by a single country, so a concert of eight powers; Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Japan and United States chopped it up for exploitation. When in 1899-1900, the Chinese rose to throw the foreigners out of their country in what came to be known as the Boxer Revolution, those eight powers sent a combined 51,755 soldiers to suppress the revolt.

     

    The defeat of the Boxer Revolution rather than dampen the enthusiasm of the Chinese to take control of their country, inspired in them a feeling of patriotism and pride. A group rejected the Western political system and sought for alternatives. It found that in the writings of two Germans, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels who taught that humanity at its cradle ran a communal system before the rise of a new system which had the Lords of the land on one hand, and the landless.

    They wrote that a revolution took place where those who own capital, propelled by the industrial revolution, overthrew the feudal system and established capitalism which is a system based on the exploitation of the mass by the few who own capital.

    They concluded that the former would in turn, overthrow the capitalists and establish a humane, non-exploitative system called communism. Messrs Marx and Engels had then encapsulated their ideas and programmes into a declaration they called the ‘Communist Manifesto.’

     

    What had seemed mere theory to many became praxis when in November, 1917, the Russian followers of Marx and Engels led by a local lawyer called Vladimir Illiych Lenin carried out a successful revolt which became known as the Bolshevik or Russian Revolution.

    A Chinese educationist, Chen Duxiu, then 42, and an intellectual, Li Dazhao, who was ten years younger, decided to carry out a similar revolt of the poor, the disposed and the oppressed in their country. They co -founded the CPC and called its first congress in July, 1921.

     

    At the time the congress held on July 23, 1921 in a sitting room on the ground floor of a residential apartment on 76-78 Xingye Lu in, intiandi in Shanghai, the CPC had only 53 members in the country. The 13 delegates at the congress had security concerns and had to move the meeting to a boat in Jiaxing, East China in the Zhejiang Province.

    Those in attendance included Chen Duxiu who became the party’s founding General Secretary (1921-27) Li Dazhao who was to be executed in the struggle for the revolution, and Mao Tse Tung (Zedong) one of the two delegates of Hunan who was to take over the leadership of the CPC on March 20, 1943.

    He proved to be a great mobiliser, teacher and military commander. He taught his comrades that: “A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery; it cannot be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate, kind, courteous, restrained and magnanimous. A revolution is an insurrection, an act of violence by which one class overthrows another.”

    In practical warfare he taught the revolutionaries: “When the enemy advances, withdraw; when he stops, harass; when he tires, strike; when he retreats, pursue.”

    He argued that: “War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.”

    On power relations, he argued that: All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.

    In situating slavery and racialism in historical context, Mao argued that: “The struggle of the Black people in the United States for emancipation is a component part of the general struggle of all the people of the world against U.S. imperialism, a component part of the contemporary world revolution.”

    He famously said women are essential for any change to take place in society because: “Women hold up half the sky.”

    Tse Tung, famously known as Chairman Mao, led the CPC to victory over the nationalists on October 1, 1949 and declared the establishment of the Peoples’ Republic of China, PRC.

     

    The phenomenal economic rise of China, challenges the belief that only capitalism can grow a modern economy. It also defeats the argument that the private sector is the engine of economic development. So while having a strong private sector, the Chinese economy is public sector- driven with component states conducting independent foreign trade with other countries. China does not allow the so-called market forces to determine its economy or exchange rate.

     

    Part of China’s contribution to the world is its ability to feed, clothe, shelter, educate and provide healthcare and social security for 1.412 billion human beings or 18.48 per-cent of world population. In 25 years from 1990, it lifted 746 million persons out of poverty and at the end of 2020, China eradicated poverty in the entire country.

     

    The Chinese strongly discourage corruption by executing those found guilty. While the controversy about the origins of Covid-19 rage, China has given the world two Covid-19 vaccines from Sinopharm and Sinovac. Also, while powerful countries like Britain have been hoarding Covid-19 vaccines, China has been distributing its vaccines especially in Africa and Asia, in some cases, free.

     

    I do not hold out China as an angel sent to the world; the truth is that every country primarily works for its own interests. However, humanity should have a common commitment to social justice.

     

    Since its revolution, China has had challenges like breakaway Taiwan, the Cultural Revolution, the Gang of Four issue, pro-Western Democracy Tiananmen Square protests and the two-state experiment in Hong Kong. But none of these have weakened the CPC in any significant way. If anything, the party seems stronger and more confident today than it has ever been. But then, nobody knows what is in the bowel of tomorrow.

     

  • Nigeria will continue to collaborate with China on infrastructural development – Presidency

    Nigeria will continue to collaborate with China on infrastructural development – Presidency

    The Federal Government says it will continue to collaborate with the Chinese government in the area of provision of critical infrastructure in the country.

    The Special adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina stated this when he hosted the Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, Cui Jianchun in his office at the State House, Abuja on Friday.

    He said: “Nigeria has a high respect for China and what China is helping Nigeria to achieve particularly in the area of infrastructure.

    ”President Buhari came at a time of severe infrastructure deficit in the country and resolved to make a difference and he is making that difference with the assistance of China.

    ”Nigeria appreciates China a lot for these and will continue to collaborate with it.”

    The Presidential spokesman said the Nigerian President had been to China two times in furtherance of the relationship and looked forward to greater collaboration.

    He assured the Ambassador that the presidential media office was ready to join hands with the Chinese in advancing the relationship.

    In his remarks, the Ambassador, who was recently posted to Nigeria, said he was at the Villa to solicit for the support of the media office of the President.

    He also expressed his gratitude for the strong relations with his country and to seek ways to make it stronger.

    Cui expressed delight for witnessing the flag off of the Lagos to Ibadan rail project and unfolded his 5Goal Nigeria-China ‘Growth, Development Progress (GDP) strategy to take the bilateral relations to higher levels.

    He said the 5-Goal strategy revolved around Political Support; Economic Cooperation; Military Collaboration; International Coordination and People to People Bond among others, built on the existing Belt and Road Initiative of the Chinese government.

    Cui, who is the 14th Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, said he looked forward to celebrating 50 years of friendship and bilateral relations between the two countries in October.

    Also at the event was the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu.

  • Merkel defends her promotion of scandal-hit Wirecard

    Merkel defends her promotion of scandal-hit Wirecard

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel, on Friday, defended her efforts to promote scandal-hit payments provider Wirecard during a China trip in 2019.

    She said that there were no indications of “grave irregularities” at the time.

    Speaking before an investigative parliamentary committee probing the shock collapse of Wirecard, Merkel denied giving any special treatment to the former German star company.

    “The Wirecard AG did not receive any preferential treatment during the trip,’’ she said.

    According to Merkel, the goals of Wirecard at the time matched those of the government and it was normal for the chancellor to promote the interests of German business during bilateral talks.

    “Despite the press reports at the time, there was no reason to assume there were grave irregularities at Wirecard.’’

    Wirecard, which had been listed on Germany’s DAX index of leading companies, admitted in June last year that 1.9 billion euros ($2.3 billion) in assets likely did not exist.

    This in turn prompted a plunge in the company’s shares, bankruptcy and the arrest of former executives.

    During the trip to China in September 2019, Merkel spoke with the Beijing leadership about the planned takeover of Chinese firm AllScore Financial by Wirecard.

    This topic had been part of Germany’s efforts to gain better access to Chinese markets, Merkel said.

    While in retrospect it seemed the trip was only about Wirecard, it was “far from it”, Merkel said, adding that she had discussed many political topics with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

    Merkel confirmed that before her trip she had met with Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, a lobbyist for Wirecard, who previously served as minister of defence and economics.

    But she said she could not recall if Wirecard was mentioned.

    She had referred zu Guttenberg to her economic advisor, Lars-Hendrik Roeller, at the time.

    Merkel defended Roeller, whose wife mediated between Wirecard and a Chinese firm, saying she had no occasion not to trust him.

    Ultimately, Merkel said that she – “I as chancellor” – bears the responsibility and everything has to be done to avoid that something similar happens in the future.

    She pointed to planned reforms of Germany’s financial watchdog BaFin to increase oversight.

    The prosecution believes that Wirecard had been cooking its books since at least 2015.

    Wirecard’s auditor, EY, however, approved them year after year, prompting questions why the financial irregularities were never noticed.

    More broadly, the revelations have cast doubts over the effectiveness of financial oversight authorities in Europe’s biggest economy.

    Finance Minister Scholz, whose ministry oversees the watchdog BaFin, was also grilled by the parliamentary committee on Thursday.

    While Scholz admitted reform was needed, he said “the responsibility for this large-scale fraud does not lie with the German government’’, pointing the finger at the auditors.

  • Reps to probe ‘refrigerated penises’ shipped to China from Nigeria

    Reps to probe ‘refrigerated penises’ shipped to China from Nigeria

    The House of Representatives has resolved to investigate alleged illicit trade on human organs between Nigeria and China.

    The resolution was sequel to a unanimous adoption of a motion by Rep. Rimamnde Kwewum (PDP-Taraba) and co-sponsored by Rep. Olajide Olatubosun (APC-Oyo), at plenary on Thursday.

    Moving the motion earlier, Kwewum said that about two weeks ago, Chinese authorities seized a cargo ship that sailed from Nigeria with 7,200 refrigerated penises.

    According to him, they were found in 36 boxes labelled as plantain on the ship that harboured at the Shanghai port called Red Market.

    He said the Chinese General Administration of Customs had alerted that an increasingly large number of armed groups in Africa used organs which were harvested in unsanitary conditions to finance their nefarious activities.

    “The media was awash a few years ago with horrifying stories of the harvest of organs of Nigerians and other Africans stranded in Libya for sale in Europe, the Middle East, America and China.

    “Aware that the increasing cases of missing persons, ritual killings and trafficking of persons out of the country may be linked to the Red Market which can be attributed to the trafficking of young men and women who end up being victims of organ harvesting;

    “Also aware that the increased banditry, kidnappings and spiraling violence in several parts of the country today make those parts of the country vulnerable and provide safe havens and ready supply channels for the illicit activities,” he said.

    Kwewum said that harvest of organs could only be done by medical surgeons with the aid of rogue public officials.

    The Rep said that perpetrators of the illicit trade generated between US$ 600 million to US$ 1.2 billion profit annually.

    Kwewum recalled that in 1987, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared that the illegal trade violated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    “Cognisant that the International Community has made efforts to curb the menace of Red Market, such as the Istanbul Declaration urging professionals to put an end to the unethical actions where organs of unfortunate victims of economic migrants and human trafficking in Europe and the Middle East are ripped off, thereby constituting a gross abuse of the rights to life of those Nigerians.

    “Convinced that if nothing is done to curb this criminal act, more criminals will set up shops dealing in human organs in Nigeria, taking advantage of the insecurity in the country,” he said.

    The house mandated the Committees on Human Rights and National Security and Intelligence to investigate the whole gamut of this value chain, known as Red Market or illicit market in human organs.

    In his ruling, the Deputy Speaker of the house, Rep. Ahmed Wase, mandated the committees to report back within 10 weeks for further legislative action.

  • What we have done to prevent importation of fake COVID-19 vaccines – FG

    What we have done to prevent importation of fake COVID-19 vaccines – FG

    Following the arrest of about 3,000 doses of fake Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines destined for Africa from China, the federal government (FG) has revealed a measure put in place to prevent the importation of fake vaccines into the country.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports this is contained in a circular released by Dr Adebimpe Adebiyi, the Director, Department of Hospital Service, Federal Ministry of Health, on behalf of the Minister of Health, Dr Osagie Ehanire in Abuja.

    The circular followed a letter from the Presidential Task Force (PTF) on COVID-19 regarding the arrest of about 3,000 doses of fake COVID-19 vaccines destined for Africa from China.

    The minister, who acknowledged receipt of the PTF letter, however, stated that “I am, therefore, to bring this to your notice and dispel any possibility of COVID-19 vaccines being available for sale or being administered by any unauthorised institution.

    “To prevent the importation of fake vaccines, kindly note that the Nigeria Customs Service has designated the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, as the only Point of Entry (PoE) for imported COVID-19 vaccines.”

    He then called the attention of chief medical directors and medical directors of federal tertiary health institutions to the fake COVID-19 vaccines destined for Africa, noting that it had been arrested in China.

  • Alleged human rights violation: China fights back, slams heavy sanctions on British individuals, entities

    Alleged human rights violation: China fights back, slams heavy sanctions on British individuals, entities

    China on Friday announced sanctions on relevant British individuals and entities.

    According to a statement by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, the United Kingdom (UK) imposed unilateral sanctions on relevant Chinese individuals and entity, citing the so-called human rights issues in Xinjiang.

    “This move, based on nothing but lies and disinformation, flagrantly breaches international law and basic norms governing international relations, grossly interferes in China’s internal affairs, and severely undermines China-UK relations,’’ the statement said.

    The Chinese Foreign Ministry has summoned British Ambassador to China to lodge solemn representations, expressing firm opposition and strong condemnation.

    The Chinese side decides to sanction the following nine individuals and four entities on the UK side that maliciously spread lies and disinformation.

    They are as follow: Tom Tugendhat, Iain Duncan Smith, Neil O’Brien, David Alton, Tim Loughton, Nusrat Ghani, Helena Kennedy, Geoffrey Nice, Joanne Nicola Smith Finley, China Research Group, Conservative Party Human Rights Commission, Uyghur Tribunal, and Essex Court Chambers.

    “As of today, the individuals concerned and their immediate family members are prohibited from entering the mainland, Hong Kong and Macao of China.

    “Their property in China will be frozen, and Chinese citizens and institutions will be prohibited from doing business with them. China reserves the right to take further measures,’’ said the statement.

    China is firmly determined to safeguard its national sovereignty, security and development interests, and warned the UK side not to go further down the wrong path.

    He said that China would resolutely make further reactions, said the statement.

  • British PM speaks on new cold war with China

    British PM speaks on new cold war with China

    British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has warned that Britain must not get drawn into a “new Cold War” with China as he set out his vision for a post-Brexit foreign policy.

    “Those who call for a new Cold War on China or for us to sequester our economy entirely from China, I think are mistaken,” Johnson told lawmakers at the House of Commons, the lower house of Parliament.

    Britain would have to “work with China where that is consistent with our values and interests,’’ said Johnson.

    He added that this included building “a stronger and positive economic relationship” and cooperation on climate change issues.

    Johnson made the remarks as the government published a major defense, security and foreign policy review earlier on Tuesday.

    According to the document published on the government website, the policy review entitled Global Britain in a Competitive Age: the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy, reveals “the government’s vision for the UK’s role in the world over the next decade and the action we will take to 2025’’.

    Johnson had described the document, which runs more than 100 pages, as the biggest review since the Cold War.

    According to the document, Britain needs to pursue a positive economic relationship with China, including deeper trade links and more Chinese investment.

    Prof. Anthony Glees from the University of Buckingham, told Xinhua that the review shows plainly that China and Chinese investment play a key part in the ambitions of a Global Britain.

    “In his brief statement to Parliament today, Johnson made it crystal clear that there is no break with China.

    “There was no suggestion in his remarks that he will give in to his own party’s critics who seek a more adversarial policy,’’ Glees said.

    Meanwhile, the document also included an emphasis on openness as a source of prosperity, a more robust position on security and resilience, and an increased determination to seek multilateral solutions to challenges like climate change.

    “Whilst the review is billed as being about ‘Global Britain,’ it’s not clear that ‘Global Britain’ is that much different from Britain the way it is,” Glees said.

    “In particular, it’s one thing to say we do all these things but another to work out how to improve relations with the EU, Germany and France in particular, given all that has gone on since 2016, after Brexit referendum.

    “The review says on security we will work closely with partners, but at present we have no security treaty with the EU and the review skips over this issue,’’ said Glees, adding “it takes two to tango.”

    Glees said it is not surprising that the review proposed levelling up and going all out for growth to nurture a strong British economy that benefits its citizens and was more competitive internationally.

    “But given the current Brexit-deal-induced mess that has meant our exports to the EU are down by 41 per cent at the moment, it’s not clear where the cash is coming from.

    “We’re told there is no money to reward nurses and carers for their efforts during the COVID crisis, so how can we afford the expense of this Review? Not answered,’’ he added.

  • China sanctions former U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, 27 other Trump officials

    China sanctions former U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, 27 other Trump officials

    China has imposed sanctions against former US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo and 27 other officials of the Trump administration.

    The action came 24 hours after Pompeo accused China of genocide against Uighur Muslims.

    The announcement was made as Joe Biden took oath of office as President.

    China said Pompeo and others had “executed a series of crazy moves, gravely interfered in China’s internal affairs, undermined China’s interests, offended the Chinese people, and seriously disrupted China-US relations”.

    Former officials affected are trade chief, Peter Navarro; national security advisers Robert O’Brien and John Bolton; health secretary, Alex Azar; UN ambassador Kelly Craft, and Steve Bannon.

    The ex-appointees and immediate family members would be banned from entering China, Hong Kong or Macao; companies and institutions associated with them can no longer do do business with China.

    Pompeo’s incoming successor, Anthony Blinken, agreed with Pompeo’s comment.

    “The forcing of men, women and children into concentration camps; trying to, in effect, re-educate them to be adherents to the ideology of the Chinese Communist party, all of that speaks to an effort to commit genocide,” Blinken said.

    A foreign ministry spokeswoman, Hua Chunying, told the media that Pompeo has made so many lies in recent years.

    “This US politician is notorious for lying and cheating, is making himself a laughing stock and a clown. We hope the new US administration can have their own reasonable and cool-minded judgment on Xinjiang issues, among other issues,” she said.

  • Former deputy gov. jailed for 11 years

    Xu Guang, former vice governor of central China’s Henan Province, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison for bribery.

    The sentence was handed down by the Intermediate People’s Court of Qingdao, east China’s Shandong Province, on Monday.

    Xu was also fined 1 million yuan (about 154,400 U.S. dollars). All that he obtained through bribery will be confiscated, according to the court sentence.

    The court found that between 2004 and 2018, Xu had taken advantage of his multiple posts in Henan’s Zhoukou city to assist some organisations and individuals in project contracting, business operations and personnel recruitment and promotion.

    In return, he accepted money and gifts worth over 12.65 million yuan.

    The court ruled that Xu’s acts constitute the crime of accepting bribes but it decided to grant a lenient sentence as he had been cooperative during investigation, confessed his crimes and showed repentance, and that all the illegal gains have been recovered.

    Xu accepted the sentence and said he will not appeal.