Tag: Contempt Charge

  • CBN gov faces contempt charge over Paris Club refund

    CBN gov faces contempt charge over Paris Club refund

    A consulting firm, Melrose General Services Limited, has filed a contempt charge against the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Olayemi Cardoso, and its Director of Legal Services, Salam-Alada Kofo, over dispute on the Paris Club refund.

    The company instituted the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/532/2025 before Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Cardoso and Kofo are facing contempt proceedings for allegedly failing to comply with a Supreme Court judgment that reversed the forfeiture of N1.22 billion and N220 million in an appeal by Melrose General Services.

    Justice Ekwo had fixed June 4 for the hearing of the matter.

    NAN reports that in June 2024, the Supreme Court overturned a previous forfeiture order against Melrose General Services Limited’s funds, which had been frozen following an investigation by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The disputed sums included N1,222,384,857.84 in Melrose’s bank account and N220 million paid by the company to Wasp Networks and Thebe Wellness as loan and investment.

    The apex court had ruled that the EFCC had not proven the funds were proceeds of fraud, as alleged.

    The court set aside the lower courts’ forfeiture orders, directing the release of the funds to their rightful owners.

    However, despite the Supreme Court’s decision, Melrose’s lawyers filed a lawsuit at the trial court, alleging that the CBN and its top officials had only partially complied with the judgment.

    Melrose, in its application before Justice Ekwo, averred that while the N1.22 billion was refunded, the outstanding N220 million remains unpaid.

    The company, through its counsel Chikaosolu Ojukwu, SAN, filed the contempt suit against the CBN governor, Director of Legal Services, the EFCC and the Minister of Finance, arguing that their refusal to release the full amount constitutes contempt of court and undermines the Supreme Court’s authority.

    Ojukwu informed the court that the EFCC, via the CBN, had only made a partial refund, and accused the CBN officials of neglecting their legal obligations regarding the remaining funds.

    He cited the apex court judgement which ruled that, “The appellant’s application( Melrose General Services limited) to set aside the order of interim forfeiture of the sum of N1,222,384,857.84 in the appellant’s account with Access Bank Plc and N220,000,000.00 in the accounts of the 2nd and 3rd respondents(Wasp Networks and Thebe Wellness), is hereby granted.”

    It would be recalled that Justice Ekwo had, on March 27, granted Melrose’s request to serve the contempt applications (Form 48 and Form 49) on the respondents, giving them seven days to reply.

    At the April 10 hearing, Melrose’s counsel, Segun Fiki, confirmed that all parties, except the Ministry of Finance, had responded to the court documents.

    The CBN’s legal team, represented by Abdulfatai Oyedele, filed a preliminary objection and counter-affidavit, arguing that the Supreme Court did not direct payment of N220 million to Melrose’s account, but to the accounts of Wasp Network Limited and Thebe Wellness Services, from which the money was originally forfeited.

    The CBN submitted that Wasp Network’s solicitors had requested payment of N200 million, while Thebe Wellness had yet to claim their N20 million share.

    The CBN maintained it had acted in compliance with the judgment and that there was no unethical conduct.

    The EFCC, represented by Martha Babatunde, filed a motion for misjoinder, asserting it should not be a party to the contempt case.

    The judge has adjourned the matter until June 4 for hearing.

    Recall that the dispute stems from the controversial Paris Club refund, a settlement involving payments to consultants for services rendered to the Nigerian Governors’ Forum.

  • Court hears Philip Shaibu’s contempt charge against Omobayo Oct. 24

    Court hears Philip Shaibu’s contempt charge against Omobayo Oct. 24

    A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, fixed Oct. 24 for the hearing of a contempt charge filed by the reinstated Deputy Governor of Edo, Philip Shaibu, against Godwins Omobayo, over alleged refusal to obey court judgment.

    Justice James Omotosho fixed the date after Shaibu’s counsel, Reuben Egwuaba, informed the court that a contempt charge had been filed for the committal of Omobayo, who took over as deputy governor, to prison due to his refusal to comply with the valid order of the court.

    Justice Omotosho equally ordered that Omobayo be served with all the court documents, including Form 49, filed on Sept. 19 in order to be given the opportunity to purge himself of the contempt charge.

    “This matter is hereby adjourned to 24th day of October for hearing of the motion on notice dated 13th September and filed 19th September seeking for committal of Engr Marvellous Godwins Omobayo and to give him opportunity to defend himself.

    “I hereby made an order that the motion be served on Marvelous Godwins Omobayo to enable him file necessary defence ,” the judge said.

    Earlier, Egwuaba prayed for a short adjournment since the current state government’s tenure would be coming to an end on Nov. 12.

    The lawyer said the court judgment delivered on July 17 was duly served on Omobayo and that several letters were also written to the house of assembly but to no effect.

    NAN earlier reported that Justice Omotosho, on Tuesday, also struck out the two separate motions filed by the Edo Government and the house of assembly challenging the reinstatement of Shaibu as deputy governor.

    The judge, in a ruling, also awarded the cost of N200, 000 each against the state government and the assembly, making a total of N400, 000.

    The development followed an application by lawyer to the state’s Attorney-General (AG), Marvin Omorogbe, and that of the house of assembly, Sonia Egbunia, seeking to withdraw the motions for stay of execution.

    They said the intention to withdraw the motion was as a result of the records of appeal which had been transmitted to the Court of Appeal.

    Although Egwuaba, who appeared for Shaibu did not opposed their intention to withdraw the two motions, he, however, asked the court for a N50 million cost each against the AG (3rd defendant) and the assembly (6th defendant) but the judge awarded the sum of N400, 000 against the two defendants.

    NAN reports that Justice Omotosho had, on July 17, voided the impeachment of Shuaibu as the deputy governor of Edo by the house of assembly.

    The judge, in the judgment, ordered his reinstatement to office on the grounds that the house of assembly failed to comply with due process in the purported impeachment.

    Justice Omotosho also held that the allegation on which the assembly based the impeachment proceedings was untenable in law and did not constitute a gross misconduct.

    The judgment was on the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/478/2024 with Shuaibu as the plaintiff.

    The reinstated deputy governor had sued the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), the Deputy Governor of Edo, the AG, Chief Judge of Edo, Speaker of Edo House of Assembly and the Edo State House of Assembly as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.

    Omobayo was, on April 8, sworn in as the new deputy governor after Shaibu’s impeachment by the state’s house of assembly.