Tag: Court

  • Farmer to spend months in prison for cutting colleague’s hand

    Farmer to spend months in prison for cutting colleague’s hand

    A Chief Magistrates Court in Okitipupa, Ondo State, on Thursday, sentenced a farmer, Abu Abubakar, to six months imprisonment for  cutting the hand of one, Ibrahim Tukur, with cutlass.

    The Magistrate, Mr Olarenwaju Adelegan, convicted and sentenced Abubakar without giving him an option of fine.

    Adelegan said that the convict, 25, should serve his term at the Okitipupa Correctional Centre.

    The convict, whose address was not given, had pleaded guilty to the one-count charge of assault.

    Earlier, the Police Prosecutor, ASP Zedekiah Orogbemi had told the court that the convict committed the offence on Jan. 30, at 8.00 a.m. at Sabo in Okitipupa, Okitipupa magisterial district.

    Orogbemi said that the convict had an altercation with the complainant, which degenerated and the former rushed to grab a machete and brought it down on the latter’s right hand that was raised to ward off the blow.

    The prosecutor said that Tukur sustained severe injuries on the hand and body as a result of the assault.
    He said that the offence was contravened Section 355 of the Criminal Code, Cap.37, Vol. 1, Laws of Ondo State, 2006.

  • Ekweremadu: Court dismisses motion seeking to vacate orders releasing Ukpo’s biodata

    Ekweremadu: Court dismisses motion seeking to vacate orders releasing Ukpo’s biodata

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, dismissed an application filed by David Ukpo, seeking an order setting aside the July 1 and 6, 2022 orders for the release of his biodata to Sen. Ike Ekweremadu in a UK court.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling, held that the applicant, the Edo Civil Society Organisations (EDOSCO), that filed the motion on Ukpo’s behalf, lacked the legal right to institute the case.

    Justice Ekwo held that the provision of Article 3 (e) of the preamble to the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules, 2009 (FREPR 2009), under which EDOSCO filed the suit, cannot be said to have granted any person without legal personality to sue or be sued in the court.

    “It is the averment of the counsel representing the applicant, Bamidele Uche Igbinedion Esq., that he is one of the lawyers in the law firm of Dele Igbinedion Chambers.

    “That this application is to protect the applicant’s human rights upon being instructed by Edo Civil Society Organisations (EDOSCO) on behalf of the applicant (Ukpo).

    “Going by this averment, it is clear that the applicant in this case is Edo Civil Society Organisations (EDOSCO).

    “The counsel for the applicant knows this but cleverly avoided to state so on the face of the application and rather depose, to this fact in the affidavit in support,” he said.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that EDOSCO, on behalf of Ukpo, had filed the motion on notice brought pursuant to Orders 14 Rules 10, 26, Rules 1, and 2 (1), and 34, Rules 4, and 7 (2) (a) of the FHC (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 (FHCCPR 2019); Sections 36 (1) and 37 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and under the inherent jurisdiction of the court.

    The applicant sought an order setting aside the proceedings and the ruling delivered by the court on July 1, 2022 In suit number: FHC/ABJ/CS/984/2022.

    He also sought an order setting aside the proceedings and the order of the court made on July 6, 2022.

    He equally sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining Ekweremadu and his wife, Beatrice, and the 1st to 5th respondents, or any other person howsoever described, acting for the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), from executing of further executing the July 2022 rulings delivered July 1 and 6, 2022.

    Alternatively, the applicant prayed the court to bar them from breaching of further breaching Ukpo’s rights to privacy guaranteed by Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution.

    But Ekweremadu and Beatrice, through their counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, urged the court to dismiss the application.

    They argued that Ukpo, who was taken to the UK sometime In 2022, could not have briefed anyone as his whereabouts was unknown.

    Besides, they argued that there was nothing before the court to show that the said minor Ukpo) briefed EDOSCO.

    Citing previous cases to back the arguement, they submitted that those cases cited did not deal with a situation where a third party purportedly instructs a counsel to appear for them in a suit.

    “In this case, the applicant on record did not instruct anyone but rather it was EDOSCO, a third party, that instructed counsel, as has been revealed in their affidavit in support, which is an issue before the court,,” they said.

    NAN reports that Justice Ekwo had, on July 1, 2022, ordered the National Identification Management Commission (NIMC), Comptroller General of Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS), Stanbic IBTC Bank, United Bank for African (UBA) and Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Plc (1st to 5th respondents respectfully), to release Ukpo’s biodata to the Ekweremadus in UK court.

    The judge ordered that all information, including his Bank Verification Number (BVN), should be released for Ekweremadus’ defence in the UK court over alleged organ harvesting.

    Justice Ekwo had, on July 6, 2022, directed the NIMC to immediately release the biodata of Ukpo to the AGF for onward transmission to the UK court.

    The court issued the order following a request to that effect by NIMC and in response to the request of the convicted couple to defend themselves in a London court.

    The order followed NIMC’s refusal to obey the earlier order of the court.

    Ekweremadu and wife had, in the application dated and filed on June 27, 2022, by Awomolo, dragged the the respondents to court.

    The couple were, on June 23, 2022, remanded in the UK police custody after they were arraigned before the Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court for alleged conspiracy to facilitate the travel ofUkpo, alleged to be a minor, for organ harvesting.

    Despite their denial, Ekweremadu and his wife were convicted and sentenced to prison in May 2023.

    While Ekweremadu was sentenced to nine years imprisonment for organ trafficking, his wife was slammed with four years and six month jail-term.

    The Medical Doctor, Obinna Obeta, who was said to have conspired with them, got 10 years imprisonment.

    Meanwhile, Ekweremadu’s wife was, in January, released from the UK prison after serving her jail-term.

    Delivering the ruling, Justice Ekwo agreed with the argument of the Ekweremadus’ that the prayers on the face of the motion paper were not prayers for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

    Counsel cannot be allowed to file what he pleases and attempt to bring same under a sue generis procedure.

    “If the applicant was interested in enforcing his fundamental rights, counsel ought to have instituted a fresh action under the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules, 2009,” he said.

    The judge said that the prayers on the motion paper had become academic and do not require any answer nor can the court grant same.

    “The information required for which this court gave order has been utilised as the respondents/applicants (the Ekweremadus) stood trial and were convicted in May 2023,” he said.

  • Court acquits Fani-Kayode of medical report forgery charge

    Court acquits Fani-Kayode of medical report forgery charge

    An Ikeja Special Offences Court on Tuesday discharged and acquitted, Femi Fani-Kayode, the former Minister of Aviation, of a medical report forgery charge.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had on Nov. 11, 2021, charged Fani-Kayode with 12 counts, including procuring of documents by false pretences, using false documents, fabricating evidence, and using fabricated evidence.

    He pleaded not guilty, and after the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, filed a no case submission.

    While delivering judgment on the no case submission, Justice Olubunmi Abike-Fadipe, held  that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant.

    She said that the prosecution failed  to establish a link between the defendant and the offences charged

    According to her, the prosecution did not present the defendant’s associates, who allegedly collected money from him, or the lawyer, who allegedly stated that the defendant instructed his law firm to take the medical reports to the Federal High Court.

    The judge ruled: “The remaining extrajudicial statements, intended as evidence, can only be used to contradict the person who made the statement when they testify in the witness box.

    “I have carefully studied the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and I can not find  where the defendant committed the offences being  alleged.

    “The prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case which  would  require the defendant to open  his defence.

    “As to the issue of costs, the defendant is at liberty to file an action report, and should do so in private.”

    The judge consequently discharged and acquitted the defendant of the alleged offences.

    EFCC had alleged that the medical reports presented by Fani-Kayode as proof of his health status were fake.

    NAN reports that the prosecution called seven  witnesses who testified against the former minister, and closed its case.

    However,  on Dec.7, 2024, Fani-Kayode filed a no-case submission, and stated that  the prosecution had failed to establish the charge against him.

    The alleged offences violates Sections 88(1), 365(3), 366 and 369 of the Criminal Law of Lagos, 2015.

  • Court sentences killers of Ogun couple, son, to death by hanging

    Court sentences killers of Ogun couple, son, to death by hanging

    An Abeokuta High Court sitting in Kobape, on Monday, sentenced three men for killing Kehinde Fatinoye, his wife, Bukola, and son, Oreoluwa, on Jan 1, 2023.

    The three convicts are Lekan Adekanbi, Ahmed Odetola and Waheed Adeniyi.

    They were arraigned alongside six others: Temitope Fadairo and Adenike Adekanbi, wife and mother respectively of the first defendant, Adekanbi.

    Others are Anuoluwapo Owolaja, Azeez Usman, Abass Odetola and Lukmon Adewusi.

    They were arraigned on a 24-count charge.

    The charges bordered on conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery, conspiracy to murder, murder, arson, escape from lawful custody, perverting the course of justice and receiving stolen property among others.

    They, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against them.

    The trial judge, Justice Basirat Adebowale, said the three convicts were majorly involved and were guilty of nine charges.

    She held that the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt that Adekanbi, Odetola and Adeniyi were guilty of the charges.

    Adebowale said the offences contravened Sections 21(b),16(1)(b) of the Prohibition of forcible occupation of landed properties, armed robbery, kidnapping, cultism and other anti-violence and other related offences, Law of Ogun 2016.

    In addition, she held that the offences contravened Sections 324, 316, 324 and 443 of the Criminal Code Laws of Ogun 2006.

    Adebowale, thereafter, convicted the trio to death by hanging.

    “You, Adekanbi, Odetola and Adeniyi, for killing father, mother and son; you don’t deserve mercy,” she said.

    The judge also convicted Fadairo, the wife of Adekanbi, to two years imprisonment for perverting the course of justice by hiding her husband.

    Meanwhile, Adekanbi’s mother, Adenike, was also sentenced to one year imprisonment for making false statements to police officers.

    Usman, a welder, was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment for receiving stolen property; two years as an accessory of the fact of armed robbery and seven years for compounding felonies.

    The jail terms are to run concurrently with hard labour.

    While Owolaja was sentenced to two years imprisonment as an accessory after the fact of murder, Odetola and Adewusi were discharged of the offences preferred against them.

    Earlier, the prosecution counsel, Mrs Adefisoye Temilola, had told the court that the trio committed the offences on Jan 1, 2023 at Karounwi Street, Ibara Housing Estate in Abeokuta.

    Temilola said Adekanbi, who was the driver to the couple, conspired with Odetola and Adeniyi to rob and murder the couple.

    She said the three convicts, while armed with a gun, hammer and cutlass, robbed Fatinoye of the sum of N1.102 million and one Hyundai vehicle, valued at N12 million.

    She also said they robbed the wife, Bukola, of her phones, valued at N1 million.

    According to the prosecutor, Adekanbi used a sledgehammer to hit Bukola on the head and slashed her neck.

    The prosecuting counsel further explained that after the robbery, Adeniyi slaughtered Fatinoye with a knife to the neck.

    According to her, the house was later set ablaze and the couple’s only son, Oreoluwa, was thrown into Ogun River with hands and legs tied, which led to his death.

  • Just In: Court sacks Kogi monarch, Ohinoyi of Ebiraland

    Just In: Court sacks Kogi monarch, Ohinoyi of Ebiraland

    A State High Court in Lokoja on Monday sacked the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, Alhaji Tijani Ahmed-Anaje.

    Justice Umar Salisu, gave the order in a judgment he delivered in Lokoja with a charge to Ahmed-Anaje not to parade himself as the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland.

    According to reports, Daudu Adeku-Ojiah, Hussain Yusuf and Abdulrahaam Suberu had in December challenged the appointment of Ahmed-Anaje by former governor Yahaya Bello as the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland.

    Represented  by Mr Lawal Rabana (SAN), the plaintiffs sued Gov. Ahmed Ododo, the State Attorney General, Muzi Abdullahi and the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland. Ahmed-Anaje as 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants in the case which began in okene before its transfer to Lokoja.

    The three plaintiffs had pleaded with the court to make a declaration that the procedure adopted in appointing the 3rd Defendant to the throne of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland was wrongful, unlawful.

    They also argued that the process was  contrary to Procedure of Ascension to the Throne of Ohinoyi of Ebira Land, Edict No 3 of 1997guiding the appointment of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland.

    They also sought for a DECLARATION that the purported recommendation of the 3rd Defendant by unknown king makers to the 1st Defendant as the Ohinoyi of Ebiraland was contrary to the clear provisions of Section 4(1) Chieis (Appoininient, Deposition and Establishment of Traditional Councils in Kogi State) Law, 2006 and, therefore, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

    “A DECLARATION that the purported Ohi’s who participated in the selection,recommendation and the process leading to the purported appointment of the 3rd Defendant as Ohinoyi of Ebiraland are non-existent, null and void.

    They sought an order of Perpetual Injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendant, by himself, agents, servants, privies or howsoever called from recognising, dealing with or according any rights or privileges to the 3rd Defendant as Ohinoyi of Ebiraland.

    Gov. Ahmed Ododo, Abdullahi and Ahmed-Anaje, had objected to the claims of the plaintiff, through their Counsels, Muzi Abdullahi and Zakari Abbas, had asked the court to dismissed the case for lack of merit.

    Justice Salisu, in his judgment , upheld the prayers of the claimants and ordered the Ahmed-Anaje to vacate the throne of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland pending a fresh selection by the king makers of the Ebiraland.

    NAN reports that no fewer than 70 candidates jostled  for the stool of Ohinoyi of Ebiraland in Kogi.

    They were screened by a committee to replace the late Alhaji Ado Ibrahim who died on Oct. 29, 2024 at the age of 94.

    The 70 eligible contestants were from four of the five eligible districts in Kogi: Okewe, Ohema, Erika, Aganiye and Adavi.

    Reacting to the judgment, Gov.  Ododo, called for calm in the state.

    The state Attorney-General, Mr Muzi Abdullahi, who spoke with NAN in Lokoja, over the case, said that the governor has instructed him to appeal against the court verdict.

    “We are confident that there will be a reversal of the judgement. The citizens should exercise restraint not to do any contrary to the Law.

    “We don’t agree with the judgment because the judge didn’t consider some objections we raised before him.

    “The judgment is neither here no there.

    “Tomorrow, by God’s grace. we are filing Notice and Grounds of appeal challenging the judgment of the court, ‘ The attorney-general said.

  • How I paid N80m to kidnappers to rescue my mother, sister – Witness reveals in court

    How I paid N80m to kidnappers to rescue my mother, sister – Witness reveals in court

    A masked witness, identified as Prosecution Witness-D (PW-D) on Thursday, told a Federal High Court in Abuja that he paid N80 million ransom for the release of his mother and sister during the 2022 Abuja-Kaduna train terrorists attack.

    The witness testified before Justice Inyang Ekwo in the ongoing trial of Mr Tukur Mamu, the kidnap negotiator, who is facing a 10-count terrorism charge. He said his mother and sister were released alongside two other victims of the attack.

    The PW-4 was lead in evidence by the lawyer to the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), David Kaswe.

    The witness, also identified simply as “D,” said that he was informed at about 8.30 pm on March 28, 2022, that his mother and sister were on the ill-fated  train in which passengers were kidnapped, some killed, some injured and some rescued.

    He said that the following morning of the attack, he went to Kaduna Hospital where the injured passengers were taken to but he could not find his mother or sister.

    He said two weeks after the train attack, he received a call from the kidnappers, who wanted him to speak with a victim, who turned out to be his sister.

    He said he communicated regularly with the abductors for about two weeks before they demanded for N200 million ransom each from victims’ relatives.

    He said though some paid, the witness said a month after the ransom was demanded, the kidnappers called him through his sister and gave him names of four journalists through whom negotiation could be done.

    The PW-D said four journalists’ names and their phone numbers were given to him. He further stated that he contacted three of the names and  they declined. The witness, however, said among the four journalists, only Tukur Mamu volunteered “to take up the responsibility.”

    “Two days later, I received a call from my sister and my sister told me that she was in good shape and that I should not get agitated.”

    The witness told the court that his sister informed him that the kidnappers said his mother, sister and some others were not their target.

    “She said they were victims of circumstances that they were circumstantial victims that they were not the targets. I asked about my late mum and she said they were all doing good,” he said.

    He said that while they were struggling to raise the money, one Friday, he received calls from former Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Lucky Irabor, and former Director General, Department of State Service (DSS), Yusuf Bichi.

    He said he was asked to see Irabor in Abuja. He said he visited Irabor and told him his plights and the little he knew. He said Irabor instructed him that whatever he discussed with Mamu, he should let him (Irabor) know.

    He said Irabor thereafter linked him with a committee set up by the Federal Government to facilitate the release of the kidnapped victims He said the kidnappers stopped communicating with him after he told them that Mamu had accepted “to take up the responsibility.”

    “As soon  as they contacted Tukur Mamu, they stopped communicating with us. Every information is from Tukur Mamu. We will go to Tukur Mamu and he will tell us they have asked us to pay 100 million each. When the negotiation was going on, we had to link Tukur Mamu with the CDS committee.”

    He said that on a fateful day, his sister called him that he should go back to Mamu and negotiate.

    The witness said he called Mamu but he told him that he had pencilled his name down and would not discussed with him any longer.

    “After some people started getting their loved ones out, it got to a stage that kidnappers were no longer talking with CDS committee.

    “It should be noted that Tukur Mamu penciled me as government agent. So he never wants to talk to me.”

    The witness said he was handicap and approached his (witness) relation who was once Mamu’s boss and the man obliged and intervened.

    He said the ransom was then reduced from N200 million to N150 million, to N100 million before they accepted to take N80 million.

    He said that in August 2022 when he brought the N80 million ransom in cash to Mamu in his compound in Kaduna, he asked him to convert it to dollar.

    The witness said he did and got a total of 118,750 U.S. dollars .

    He said two weeks after, Mamu called him for an additional money to make it up a total of 120,000 dollars.

    The witness said he took the money to Mamu on Thursday but he was informed by him that the kidnappers had difficulties due to swampy terrain.

    He said after Jumai prayer on Friday, the next day, Mamu called to informed that he had established contact with the kidnappers.

    “I drove out from Mamu’s compound on  a hired gulf car packed with bread and milk as demanded by the kidnappers.”

    He said that after about 20 minutes, he received a call asking him to follow a vehicle in front marked 211 and they went towards Binin Gwari.

    He said after the town, they stopped and the kidnappers came and brought his mother and sister and the other two victims.

    Under cross examination by the defence counsel Abdul Mohammed SAN, the witness said he took the money he brought and a written note from Mamu to the kidnappers.

    The witness said he did not know whether the CDS communicated with Mamu because he was not a member of the committee.

    He clarified that a former commissioner negotiated with Mamu. He agreed with the defence counsel that the kidnappers said they needed four journalists that they would pay to do a job for them.

    On whether it was the kidnappers that were dictating what should be done, the judge said the court would determine that from the record.

    Recall the Federal Government had, on March 21, 2023, arraigned Mamu for allegedly aiding terrorist operations in the country.

    The Kaduna-based Islamic scholar was further accused of collecting various sums of money in different currencies from families of victims of the train attack, on behalf of the Boko Haram terrorists sect.

    FG told the court that investigations revealed that the defendant collected an aggregate sum of $420, 000 from families of the victims, as well as N21 million from another set of families of the train attack.

    It further alleged that Mamu concealed funds he earned from services he rendered to the terrorist organisation, in his residence in Kaduna State.

    It told the court that the defendant had sometime in 2022, in Kaduna State, received ransom payments in the sum of N500, 000 on behalf of the Boko haram terrorist group, from families of the train attack that were held as hostages.

    More so, in the charge that was signed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mr M.B. Abubakar, FG added that the defendant exchanged voice note communications with one Baba Adamu, identified as spokesperson of the Boko Haram, in relation to acts of terrorism.

    It maintained that the defendant acted in breach of the Terrorism Prevention, Prohibition Act, 2022. Mamu, however, denied all the allegations.

  • Court strikes out defamation suit against Dele Farotimi

    Court strikes out defamation suit against Dele Farotimi

    A Federal High Court in Ado-Ekiti on Wednesday struck out the criminal defamation suit against human rights lawyer, Dele Farotimi.

    Justice Babs Kuewunmi struck out the case following an application for the withdrawal of the charge by the prosecution.

    The Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, had arraigned Farotimi for allegedly defaming legal icon, Afe Babalola, in his book entitled: “Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System.”

    At the resumed hearing, the prosecution counsel, Mr Samson Osobu, informed the court that the complainant had filed a notice of discontinuance.

    He cited Section 108(1)(2)(a) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 to back his argument.

    “The prosecution, with the leave of this honourable court, seeks to withdraw the charge against the defendant and prays that the charge be struck out,” Osobu said.

    He further explained that the decision followed interventions by well-meaning Nigerians and a request from Babalola himself to discontinue the matter.

    The defence counsel, Mr Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika (SAN), did not oppose the application for withdrawal.(

  • ECOWAS Court dismisses human rights violation claim against Nigeria

    ECOWAS Court dismisses human rights violation claim against Nigeria

    The ECOWAS Court of Justice has dismissed an alleged human rights violation suit filed by one Patrick Eholor, on behalf of Makia Media Limited, against the Federal Government.

    NAN reports that the applicant had in suit number ECW/CCJ/APP/43/21, alleged that Nigeria’s broadcasting laws violated social media rights, human rights defenders, activists, bloggers, and journalists.

    Delivering judgment, Justice Sengu Koroma, Judge Rapporteur, with Justices Ricardo Gonçalves (presiding) and Dupe Atoki (member), dismissed all the applicant’s claims and upheld the preliminary objection raised by Nigeria.

    The court held that the applicant lacked the legal capacity to bring the matter before it as ‘actio popularis’ (public interest) suit.

    According to the Community Court, the applicant also failed to present evidence mandating him to act in a representational capacity on behalf of Makia Media Limited.

    It, therefore, declared the entire suit inadmissible “both as an actio popularis suit and a representational suit.”

    “The reliefs sought must be exclusively for the benefit of the public to the exclusion of the personal interest of the Applicant,” Justice Koroma held.

    The court noted that it only had jurisdiction to entertain the case because it bordered on alleged human rights violations but pointed out that the case was inadmissible.

    The court further held that although the applicant had jurisdiction to bring a claim for human rights violation as a corporate body, the suit neither met the requirement of ‘actio popularis’ principle.

    According to the Community Court, the action was not for the benefit of the public, and the applicant did not demonstrate that the victims cannot be envisioned by the Court.

    Eholor had in his submission argued that various Nigerian Broadcasting Code provisions were inconsistent with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and International Treaties and Conventions to which Nigeria is a signatory.

    The applicant had further claimed that in July 2020, the Respondent through the Nigeria Broadcasting Commission (NBC) began implementation of repressive Sections of the Code, particularly Sections 5, 4 (1), (f) and 5 (4), (3).

    He argued that NBC considered all coverage on security issues as a threat to governance and engaged in arbitrary arrest and detention of media practitioners.

    He further claimed that the Respondent also failed to release public information sought by practitioners, which violated their rights to freedom of expression and information.

    Responding, Nigeria had denied the claims of the applicant, arguing that no court had declared any section of the NBC Code as ambiguous or illegal and the applicant had not been prevented from exercising its rights within the limits of the law.

    It added that the applicant was not at any time arrested or detained, and as a corporate body, lacked the capacity to sue for the violation of human rights.

    The court, however, ordered Nigeria to pay an interlocutory cost of 250,000 Naira to the applicant due to the respondent’s  “tardiness” in the course of the matter.

  • Court summons Iyabo Obasanjo, ex-Senator over Abuja property dispute

    Court summons Iyabo Obasanjo, ex-Senator over Abuja property dispute

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday, ordered Sen. Iyabo Obasanjo, the eldest daughter of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, to appear in court to show cause why she should not be stopped from trespassing into an Abuja landed property.

    The property is located at Plot 4254, Cadastral Zone A04, measuring approximately 1.67Ha in Asokoro District, FCT, Abuja.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling on an ex-parte motion moved by counsel to the plaintiffs, Abniyilo Na’allah; also ordered the former Senator representing the FCT, Philip Aduda, and five other co-defendants to appear before the court in the next adjourned date.

    Other defendants named in the ex-parte motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/67/202 include Ismail Iron, John Mbata, Jamaila Sani Alhassan, Altine Jibrin, and unknown persons as 3rd to 7th defendants respectfully.

    “A motion ex-parte for an order for interim injunction dated 13th January, 2025 and field 17th January, 2925, is moved.

    “Upon studying the prayers and averments in support of the motion ex-parte and the averments in the affidavit of urgency, I am of the opinion that the prayers are not such that can be granted without hearing from the defendants.

    “I hereby make an order that the plaintiffs/applicants should put the defendants on notice within seven days of this order and the defendants to show cause  why the prayers sought should not be grated,” Justice Ekwo ruled.

    However, the judge granted the prayer in the second ex-parte motion equally moved by Na’allah seeking for an order of substituted service of all the originating processes and other court documents on the defendants through publication in two national dailies.

    Earlier, the lawyer submitted that the defendants/respondents’ addresses and occupation were not known to them at the time of filing the substantive suit which is pending before thie court.

    He alleged that the defendants/respondents are always seen on Plot 4254, Cadastral Zone A04 at Asokoro in Asokoro District of Abuja.

    He said services of the originating processes and all other court processes on the defendants/respondents would become very difficult and impossible since there addresses were not known to them.

    The lawyer said it would occasion unnecessary delay to effect service personally on the defendants/respondents, urging the court to grant their relief.

    Justice Ekwo, who directed the plaintiffs to effect the service of the processes on the defendants within seven days of the order through publication, adjourned the matter until March 6 for defendants to show cause why the interim.order should not be granted.

    NAN reports that the plaintiffs; ABB Electrical Systems Limited and Chief Amb. Yohana Y.D. Margif are 1st and 2nd plaintiffs or applicants in the motion dated Jan. 13 but filed Jan. 17 by Na’allah.

    The applicants sought an order of interim injunction restraining the defendants/respondents from entering, trespassing, altering or modifying the property known as Plot 4254, Cadastral Zone A04, measuring approximately 1.67Ha, Asokoro, Asokoro District FCT-Abuja belonging to the plaintiffs pending the hearing and determination of the suit

    In their six-ground argument, the applicants said they were agitated with the fear of the defendants entering, trespassing, altering or modifying the property belonging to them given the alleged imminent threat made by the defendants on the land to forcefully take possession and ownership from them.

    They said they are the rightful owners of the land by virtue of the statutory Right of Occupancy granted to them

    “That the plaintiffs/applicants have been in quiet and peaceful possession of the land without any challenge from the defendants/respondents or anyone at all.

    “It will occasion serious miscarriage of justice against the plaintiffs/applicants if the defendants/respondents are allowed to tamper with, enter, trespass, alter or modify the property belonging to the plaintiffs.

    “Allowing the defendants/respondents to tamper with, enter, trespass, alter or modify the property belonging to the plaintiffs will destroy the res and render the judgment of this court nugatory,” they said.

    The applicants said irreparable damage would be caused to them if the defendants were not restrained.

    Chief Margif, in the affidavit he deposed to, said the company (1st plaintiff) was allocated the parcel of land by the Federal Capital Development Adminstration (FCDA) covered by a Statutory Right of Occupancy with new issued date of May 23, 2006.

    He said the company intended to start developing the said land in compliance with terms contained on the statutory Right of Occupancy and other guiding rules and laws within the FCT.

    He alleged that the recent activities of the defendants, including Sen. Obasanjo, who represented Ogun Central Senatorial District between 2007 and 2011, had become worrisome.

    Margif prayed the court to grant their application in the interest of justice.

    NAN

  • Man bags 10 years imprisonment for robbing NYSC member

    Man bags 10 years imprisonment for robbing NYSC member

    An Ikeja High Court on Monday sentenced a  man, Ayomide Olayemi, to 10 years imprisonment for robbing an artisan and a National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member of their belongings.

    Olayemi, had pleaded guilty to a two-count amended charge of attempted felony and stealing. Justice Modupe Nicol-Clay, sentenced him, following a plea bargain agreement.

    The judge handed down the verdict based on the recommended term of 10 years imprisonment on the plea bargain agreement.

    Nicol-Clay, in her judgment, held that the court was satisfied that the convict entered into the plea bargain agreement willingly, and understood the implication of his guilty plea.

    She said: “This court finds the agreed punishment of 10 years to be adequate in view of the convict’s admission of guilt, and show of remorse.

    “Ayomide Olayemi, is hereby convicted for the offence of attempt to commit felony and stealing. He is hereby sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. The sentence shall commence from the date of his remand being Jan. 3, 2019.”

    The convict was first arraigned on Nov. 14, 2019, and he pleaded not guilty. The convict entered into a plea agreement and changed his plea.

    Earlier, the Lagos State Counsel, Mrs Titilayo Olanrewaju-Daud, told the court that the convict committed the offences on Dec.31, 2018, at about 12.00 p.m., at Surulere / Ojuelegba Axis in Lagos.

    The state counsel said that the convict stole four automated teller machine cards, NYSC Identification card, a driver’s license, Samsung C5 gold mobile phone and the sum of N2,050.

    She said the stolen items belonged to an artisan, one Mr Hunwanu Adebayo and an NYSC member, one Mr Adekanmbi Olubusayo.

    According to the prosecutor, the offences contravene Sections, 76 (6) of the Administration of Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2011, and Sections 406 (1) and 287 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.