Tag: Cross

  • BBNaija 2021: I’ll pick Cross over Jaypaul as deputy Head of House – Saskay

    BBNaija 2021: I’ll pick Cross over Jaypaul as deputy Head of House – Saskay

    Big Brother Naija housemate, Saskay, has she would not pick Jaypaul as the Deputy Head of House, DHoH, if she wins the Head of House, HoH, challenge.

    Speaking with Sammie on Monday morning, the dark-skinned housemate, who escaped eviction on Sunday, said she needed a housemate who is loud.

    She said she would rather pick Cross instead of Jaypaul because she does not have the strength to control the housemate.

    Both Cross and Jaypaul are showing interest in Saskay, who, from all indications, does not want any serious relationship with male housemates in the Shine Ya Eye house.

    “I’ve already told him that I want to pick someone who is loud because I don’t have the strength to control these housemates.

    “But didn’t tell him I’ll pick Cross over him. But picking Cross is also quite risky. Because sharing a room with him means we’ll be closer.” Saskay told Sammie.

     

  • BBNaija S6: Saskay prettier than Maria one billion times, says Cross

    BBNaija S6: Saskay prettier than Maria one billion times, says Cross

    Big Brother Naija Shine Ya Eye housemate, Cross, on Sunday rated Saskay as the prettiest female housemate.

    Comparing Saskay to Maria, another female housemate, Cross said ‘Maria is light in complexion and I have seen several ladies during my stay abroad with similar feature so she doesn’t freak me; but Saskay is different. For me, Saskay is prettier than Maria one billion times.

    He made the remarks during a conversation with Peace. Cross, whose affection for Saskay is now an open secret also disclosed that he wouldn’t mind to let another housemate, Jay Paul win Saskay’s heart.

    “Sometimes, I feel like allowing Saskay and Jay Paul relationship sail. I like Jay Paul” He said.

  • BBNaija: I love Cross but too many ladies are around him- Princess

    BBNaija: I love Cross but too many ladies are around him- Princess

    Princess, one of the Big Brother Naija, Season 6 housemates, says she is in love with a fellow housemate, Cross.
    Princess said on Friday during a Diary Session that she had not been able express her feeling to Cross because too many ladies were always around him.
    Earlier in the week, Cross was seen telling other housemates that lots of people would be surprised about his decision after the show.
    He promised to go all out to have a relationship with Peace, a fellow housemate.
    Cross described Peace as a “Correct babe” he had observed very closely in the last three weeks.
    This made it so obvious that Cross was not interested in Princess, but Peace.
    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the television reality show started July 24, and lit currently has 23 housemates.
    The winner of the Big Brother Naija, Season 6, Shine Ya Eye edition will get N90 million cash prize and other prizes. (
  • BBNaija :I feel bad for making Saskay drunk – Cross

    BBNaija :I feel bad for making Saskay drunk – Cross

    Big Brother Naija, BBNaija Season 6 housemate, Cross has revealed that he feels bad for making Saskay drunk.

     

    Cross revealed this during his secret diary session with Biggie.

    According to him, he has feelings for Saskay because she’s smart and a great person to work with.

    He, however, confessed that he regrets making her drunk on Saturday night.

    “I like Saskay but feel bad for making her drunk on Saturday night.

    “I like her because she is smart, a genius. I’d love to be in her team for any task and I enjoy working with her but my evil side is happy but my normal side is not for doing that to her.”

    TheNewsGuru reports that Saskay, Arin, Tega, Princess and Nini are up for possible eviction on Sunday.

    At least one of the housemates nominated will be evicted next Sunday.

     

  • BBNaija: Not sure I would have sex with Michael-Jackie B

    BBNaija: Not sure I would have sex with Michael-Jackie B

    Big Brother Naija housemate Jackie B has revealed that she is attracted to Michael but not sure she would have sex with him.

    Jackie made the revelation during a chat with Angel.

    When Angel asked if she would have sex with Michael, Jackie B said she is not yet sure.

    She further revealed that she is not sure he has a big manhood because she likes it big.

    Jackie B said, “There’s an attraction. I’m not sure if his size is big though.

    However, Angel added that she saw him naked while having his bath and Michael’s manhood is not big.

    In another development, Angel revealed she is sexually attracted to Cross.

    Discussing with Cross in the house, she told him she’s sexually attracted to him.

    This is the first time Angel would admit she feels something for Cross.

    Angel said: “Let me tell you something today.

    “I’m sexually attracted to you, do you know that?”

    Cross, responding, said he had no idea Angel was attracted to him.

     

     

  • BBNaija: Cross exposes his manhood to female housemates

    BBNaija: Cross exposes his manhood to female housemates

    Big Brother Naija, BBNaija housemate, Cross on Sunday night stunned many when he exposed his penis to female housemates.

    Cross did this during a Truth or dare game with housemates.

    Sammie had dared him to take out his manhood and show the female housemates.

     

    Cross didn’t hesitate as he removed his boxers and brought out his manhood.The female housemates were shocked as some kept staring, while others took their face away.This is the first time the housemates will have the truth or dare game.

     

     

    In a similar vein, BBNaija housemate Yousef on Sunday, kissed Liquorose.

    Yousef gave Liquorose a French kiss during a Truth or Dare game.He was dared by Cross to kiss a female housemate for 10 seconds.Yousef did not hesitate and immediately moved towards Liquorose and gave her a kiss.

     

  • The enemies of the cross (2) – Femi Aribisala

    Femi Aribisala

    Jesus says: “Whoever of you does not forsake all that he has cannot be My disciple.” (Luke 14:33). Few Christians are prepared to entertain this requirement.

    We may not exactly walk away physically, but many of us have walked away spiritually. We may remain in the church but in antipathy with the doctrines of Christ.

    We may still call ourselves Christians but, in actual fact, we are no longer believers if we ever were. Indeed, Paul gives us a completely different classification. He maintains that we are “enemies of the cross of Christ:” (Philippians 3:18).

    Enemies of the cross are Christians whose lifestyles betray the cross of Jesus Christ. Jesus did not preach a self-centred prosperity gospel. Instead, he said his disciples must deny themselves and take up their crosses in order to follow him (Matthew 16:24).

    However, enemies of the cross are devoted to the gratification of their own desires. They live not to please God but themselves. They are proud of things they should be ashamed of. Such people are in for a rude awakening in the after-life:

    “These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe.” (2 Thessalonians 1:9-10).

    Peter’s dilemma

    Peter was initially one such enemy of the cross. The more he listened to Jesus, the more uncomfortable he became. When Jesus said He would be killed in Jerusalem, Peter could no longer restrain himself. He felt that that kind of message should be discouraged. It would drive people away from the church.

    Peter was so disturbed that he had the effrontery to take Jesus aside and rebuke him for preaching a gospel that entailed suffering and dying. But Peter must have been shocked at the ferocity of Jesus’ reaction: “He turned and said to Peter, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.’” (Matthew 16:23).

    When Jesus preached that rich men would be hard-pressed to enter the kingdom of heaven, Peter had a crisis of faith. He wondered what this could possibly mean. If a rich man cannot make it, Peter thought, who then can be saved? If a rich man cannot make it, what would happen to his expectations of being rich through the gospel?

    Therefore, Peter sought some clarifications from Jesus. He reminded him that the disciples had left everything in order to follow him. What then was in store for them for all the sacrifices they had made?

    Wisdom of God

    Jesus’ response to Peter is a classic in divine wisdom: “Assuredly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or lands, for My sake and the gospel’s, who shall not receive a hundredfold now in this time- houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions- and in the age to come, eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last first.” (Mark 10:29-31).

    Like many Christians, Peter received this word carnally, so he was satisfied with it. He did not know that when Jesus speaks, his words must be understood spiritually. (John 6:63). Peter never bothered to think that it is actually physically impossible to receive a hundredfold of brothers and sisters and mothers and children.

    He probably thought about it only in terms of lands and houses, although even there, it is highly unlikely. I know of no Christian who has ever received one hundred houses or a hundred pieces of Landed property as a reward for following Jesus.

    But when Jesus rose from the dead, he left Peter in no doubt as to precisely what the real rewards of discipleship would be for him in this lifetime. He said to him: “Most assuredly, I say to you, when you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish.”

    “This He spoke, signifying by what death he would glorify God. And when He had spoken this, He said to him, ‘Follow Me.’” (John 21:18-19).

    In effect, Jesus told Peter that he would be killed for his faith. It was now in the realisation of his impending martyrdom and not in the hope of the acquisition of choice real estate that Peter was now required to follow Jesus. But how does one follow a Saviour, knowing full well that it would lead to one’s death?

    That is the challenge of the Christian faith. (1 Corinthians 15:31; Romans 6:3-4).

    Flabbergasted, Peter wanted to know what was in store for others. “What about John?” he asked. “What would happen to him?”

    Perhaps he was hoping to hear that, in John’s case, he would be eaten by a lion, so that he could take some comfort from that. But Jesus simply told him to mind his own business. He said to Peter: “If I want him to live until I return, what is that to you? You follow me.” John 21:22).

    Crucified Saviour

    As observed earlier, the salvation we want is not the salvation that Christ came to give. What we desire is the salvation of the body and not of the soul. We want a saviour who will shield us from the vagaries of life. We want him to make sure bad things will not happen to us but to other people. We want a saviour who will guarantee our financial prosperity and security.

    However, Jesus is not that kind of Saviour. He is the Saviour of the soul, and of the spiritual body of Christ. (Ephesians 5:23). He is not the Saviour of the physical body of men. Indeed, Jesus himself did not even save his own body. When he was crucified, he died.

    Jesus’ death is the most eloquent testimony of God’s complete disregard for the flesh. God despises the flesh and has determined that all flesh must die. (Isaiah 40:6-7). Even when His only begotten Son inhabited human flesh, God made no exception to Him.

    He did not provide Jesus with a new and improved version of the flesh. Instead, Jesus was without beauty in the flesh. (Isaiah 53:2). He was despised in the flesh and was crucified in the flesh. Thereby God demonstrated conclusively that the flesh is irredeemably condemned.

    But at the same time, God asserted the primacy of the Spirit by raising Jesus from the dead. Jesus himself teaches that: “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing.” (John 6:63).

    “For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh, that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.” (Romans 8:3-4).

  • How do you deal with a God who decides to send you to the cross? Femi Aribisala

    Many Christians make the fundamental mistake that Paul made, which he cautions that no one else should make. They see Jesus and God simply from a human point of view, forgetting that God is not a man. (Numbers 23:19).
    When he later realised his error, Paul wrote: “From now on, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know him thus no longer.” (2 Corinthians 5:16).
    God is not a nice person according to the flesh. God is a spirit, and the spirit and the flesh can never see eye to eye. (Galatians 5:17).
    Let me ask some leading questions here. What kind of father is God? Certainly not the kind we would readily recommend, according to the prescriptions of our humanity.
    What kind of father tells his son to marry a prostitute as God did with Hosea? (Hosea 1:2). What kind of person tells the Levites to carry a sword and kill members of their own family and relations? (Exodus 32:27). What kind of person instructs Isaiah to go around without his trousers for three years? (Isaiah 20:2-4).
    What kind of person instructs Saul to attack Amalek and kill all the men, women, children, babies, sheep, camel and donkeys? (1 Samuel 15:3).
    What kind of person kills off millions of his own children, the Israelites, one by one over forty years in the wilderness? God, that is who.
    Whatever you may call that kind of person, I would have you know that he cannot be a nice person as men regard it. If God were a man, he would not be a nice man at all. God’s concept of goodness is different from that of a man.
    Therefore, Jesus said to the Jews: “You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For what is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.” (Luke 16:15).
    Rejection of Jesus
    The truth is that most people don’t like the God of the bible, and most don’t like Jesus of Nazareth. The scriptures had forewarned that Jesus would be despised and rejected by men and that we would not esteem him. (Isaiah 53:3). Don’t make the mistake of thinking this prophecy is only applicable to the Jews of biblical Israel. It is not.
    The bible is a living word and the word of God never passes away. (Matthew 24:35). Accordingly, even Christians today don’t like Jesus; although many would not admit this. But because we don’t like him, we don’t want to know him and have great difficulty being like him.
    We don’t see in Jesus the beauty we desire, therefore, the church has been busy reconstructing the biblical image of Jesus. The preferred portrait is now one of a handsome European-looking man with blue eyes. Jesus is no longer naked and unashamed but covered on the cross.
    The cross itself has become an ornament that is worn and not a burden that is carried. The gospel is now preached with the enticing words of man’s wisdom. As a result, we have ended up with a worldly Jesus and with a worldly faith.
    Who wants a God who is a servant? Who wants a God that rides a donkey instead of a chariot? Listen to a lot of the sermons preached in our churches today and you immediately realise that Christians don’t want that kind of God.
    Some don’t even want a Messiah who drinks alcohol; therefore, we insist that all Jesus drank was grape juice.
    But why would Jesus get a bad report as a wine-bibber for drinking grape juice? (Matthew 11:19).
    Peter’s denial
    Peter, one of Jesus’ closest disciples, did not like Jesus. How do you deal with a God who washes your feet? Peter would have none of it. (John 13:6-8). How do you deal with a God who would allow himself to be killed? “Be it far from you, Lord,” cried Peter, “this shall not happen to you.”
    But this only earned him a very sharp rebuke: “Jesus turned on Peter and said, ‘Get away from me, you Satan! You are a dangerous trap to me. You are thinking merely from a human point of view, and not from God’s.’” (Matthew 16:23).
    How do you deal with a God who decides to send you to the cross? If that is what the Lord had in store for him, Peter wanted to know what he had in mind for John. But Jesus simply told him to mind his own business. (John 21:21-22). When the crunch came, is it any wonder that Peter denied Jesus not once but three times?
    Offensive Jesus
    For this reason, the prophets warned that the Messiah would be a rock of offense. He would do things in a way and manner that would not meet human approval.
    As a twelve-year-old, Jesus stayed all day and night in the temple for three days without telling his parents where he was. That would be unacceptable in any decent family. When rebuked about this by his parents, he replied: “Why did you seek me? Did you not know that I must be about my Father’s business?” (Luke 2:49). This would have earned him a few slaps in the families of today.
    Jesus made a whip, beat people and smashed their wares in the temple. He called a woman who came to request healing for her child a dog. (Matthew 15:26). At times, people can be won over with gentle words. At times, they need a smack on the head to see sense. Jesus did both.
    He refused to help John the Baptist when Herod arrested him. When he knew that his good friend Lazarus was dead, he said he was glad. (John 11:14-15). He kept company with disreputable people. (Matthew 9:11). He took sides with a woman caught in adultery. (John 8:7). He asked a man who had been sick for thirty-eight years if he would like to be healed. Then he only healed that one man and left all the others unhealed. (John 5:6-9).
    He pronounced woe on the Pharisees and abused them, calling them whitewashed tombstones. (Matthew 23:27). He called some people fools. (Matthew 23:17). He told the Jews that the devil was their father. (John 8:44). He denied his own mother and brothers. (Matthew 12:47-50).
    Clearly, Jesus is not a nice man as men call nice. But this same Jesus is now our righteousness. For: “We are all infected and impure with sin. When we put on our prized robes of righteousness, we find they are but filthy rags.” (Isaiah 64:6).
    Therefore, we must be divorced from the niceness of men and be married to the goodness of God. “Everything that we have- right thinking and right living, a clean slate and a fresh start- comes from God by way of Jesus Christ.” (1 Corinthians 1:30-31).
    Jesus says: “Blessed is he who is not offended because of me.” (Matthew 11:6). This means blessed is he who is not offended by how God does things. Blessed is he who is not offended by what God chooses to do and what he chooses not to do.

  • Lessons on carrying a cross -Femi Aribisala

    By Femi Aribisala

    One day, at three o’clock in the morning, the Lord woke me up to spend some time with him. In the middle of the fellowship, he gave me a strange instruction.

    He asked me to replace my settees in our main living-room downstairs with the ones in the den upstairs.

    What was odd about this was that the settees in the den were ragged and literally in tatters. Surely, it was inappropriate to put them in the living room where we entertained guests.

    Baited breath

    Nevertheless, I was very excited by the instruction. I felt it could only mean one thing: the Lord was planning to replace the old furniture with new ones. The settees in question were twenty-three years old. We could have replaced them long before then, except that the Lord had taken over our finances and buying new settees did not seem to be one of his priorities. But now, it seemed, the time had finally come. We were in for a treat.

    Since we had waited patiently for so long to replace them, I wondered what kind of replacement the Lord would come up with. One thing was certain; they would be fabulous.

    I quickly obeyed. I did not wait until there was someone else awake to help me. All night long, I carried the old settees downstairs and arranged them in the living room. I then put the relatively new ones upstairs in the den. It was not easy, but I managed to do it all by myself. Later on, I explained the situation to my wife. “The Lord has decided to get us new furniture,” I declared exuberantly. “In readiness, he has asked that we move the old ones downstairs.”

    I expected all this to be accomplished in a matter of days. But days rolled into weeks; and weeks rolled into months, and nothing happened. The Lord seemed to have completely forgotten about the question of our furniture. I became confused. Did I get it wrong? Was it not the Lord who told me to bring the old furniture downstairs? What exactly is the meaning of this? What is the Lord trying to bring out in all this?

    Reproach of men

    God promised Abram a son. On the basis of that promise, he told him to change his name. “Your name will no longer be Abram,” he said. “From now on, your name shall be called Abraham.” So let us say that Abraham takes out an ad in a newspaper saying: “I, previously known as Abram, now wish to be called Abraham (father of many nations). All previous documents remain valid.” He is now to be referred to as “father of many nations” except that he still does not even have one child. To make matters worse, after God made the promised, he seemed to forget all about it for the next twenty-five years.

    What is the point of this? What is supposed to happen to Abraham in the meantime? In the meantime, God has turned Abraham into a laughing stock. Abraham has become a childless “father of many nations.”

    Why does God behave like this? Why is God seemingly determined to make us a reproach of men? Take a look at the complaint of the psalmist: “I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people. All those who see me ridicule me; they shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying, “He trusted in the LORD, let him rescue him; let him deliver him, since he delights in him!” (Psalm 22:6-8).

    This has been my experience with the Lord. How was I to explain the transition in my life from a highfalutin intellectual to a believer to my old friends? How could I go from grace to grass in the name of the gospel? How could I end up preaching the gospel with an Oxford doctorate?

    Therefore, for over ten years, I cut off all contact with my friends. I just could not face them. I was convinced they would not understand. In any case, I had lost my earlier status. I was not even the pastor of a big or famous church. I was merely the coordinator of a small fellowship in a little corner of Lagos.

    Object lesson

    The Lord’s injunction concerning my old settees turned out to be an object lesson on carrying a cross as a disciple of Christ. The old settees were a major eyesore in our living room. I started dreading people coming to visit us. What would they think?

    The settees were torn all over. In many places, the underlying foam was clearly visible. So I stopped inviting people home. If they came uninvited, I would go into some elaborate explanation about the furniture, laying the blame squarely at the doorstep of the Holy Spirit. “I’m sorry about the condition of this place, but the Holy Spirit told me to put this twenty-three year old furniture bang in the living room.”

    Many looked at me pitifully; convinced I was a victim of some bizarre deception. But the Lord did not make things any easier. The Holy Spirit wanted to know why I found it necessary to explain to everyone that he was the one who told me to put the torn furniture in the living-room. Then he told me I should stop doing so. Neither could I pray that people would not come to visit me. The same God to whom the prayer would be addressed was the very person who was clearly determined to embarrass me.

    I had assumed that the whole point of the exercise was to get me new settees. But now I detected a different disturbing motive. God was determined to humiliate me. Now here is the rub: why was the Lord doing this to me? I thought I should have been commended for using a settee for over twenty-three years. Instead, the Lord turned this into a reproach for me.

    Redemption

    After a few embarrassing months, it became clear to me that the Lord had no intention of getting us new settees. I found it necessary to remind him that I actually had not asked for new settees. He was the one who brought the matter up. Since he was clearly no longer interested, could I please put the old ones back in their original hiding place upstairs? The answer was an emphatic “No.”

    Jesus says: “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it. What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?” (Matthew 16:24-26).

    Twenty-three years of living with the same furniture, and seven months of having torn furniture displayed for all to see in my living room, the Lord finally instructed me to go to a precise shop where he showed me a new set of settees that were simply beautiful. Moreover, he provided me with the money to buy it.

  • The Atiku cross

    By Udenna Orji

    In politics, reputation is critical to the success or failure of a candidate at the polls. And so, advertising and indeed, branding are used relentlessly by politicians to fight for the mind of voters.

    One of Nigeria’s most intelligent and most gifted politicians, former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, the Turakin Adamawa, is carrying a burden; a political cross of sorts placed upon him by a tiny but influential group of politicians who are determined to use any means possible to destroy his ever-rising political influence. They are committed and sworn to doing anything, whatsoever; legitimate or illegitimate, moral or immoral, even the outright peddling of falsehood, to deny Nigerians the dividends of Atiku’s election to political office.

    In this enterprise of stopping Atiku by any means, the former Vice President and stalwart of the APC’s traducers have deployed the practice of branding, the process of creating a unique name and image for a product in the consumer’s mind mainly through advertising campaigns with a consistent theme. In communication, if you say a thing consistently, it goes into the consciousness of the people as the truth.

    In Nigeria, all you need to do to destroy a politician’s electoral fortunes is to put on him or her, the toga of corruption, whether true or false. And that is the strategy of those who feel embittered and threatened by Atiku’s political pedigree – brand Atiku as corrupt and promote this theme of corruption consistently before the voting public – lie consistently to the public and destroy Atiku politically.

    None of those painting Atiku as corrupt has produced any shred of evidence that he is indeed corrupt. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo and members of his kitchen cabinet, who are credited with placing this corruption tag on Atiku in vengeance over the Turaki’s truncating of his (Obasanjo’s) Third Term bid, investigated Atiku in Nigeria and virtually in every country of the world. But everywhere Obasanjo and his henchmen went, Atiku was given a clean bill of health. No corrupt act was found to have been perpetrated by Atiku in Nigeria or in any country of the world. No court in Nigeria or in any nation on earth has found Atiku guilty of any iota of corruption.

    But still, the stop-Atiku-cabal continues to advertise and brand Atiku as corrupt. Their reason is simple: If Atiku stopped Obasanjo from getting an unconstitutional Third Term in Aso Rock, then Atiku must not be allowed to enter Aso Rock.

    Even those who did not plot Obasanjo’s Third Term bid but who see Atiku’s growing influence as a threat to their own ambition have now joined the Atiku-is-corrupt symphony in order to dislodge the former Vice President politically and realize their own ambition.

    Obasanjo while President of Nigeria hounded then Bayelsa State governor, Diepriye Alamieyeseigha, impeached and jailed him because of corruption. Obasanjo also went after then Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Tafa Balogun, arrested him, tried and jailed him also for corruption. A rampaging Obasanjo went after Atiku, searched the entire world for evidence to nail him but could not find any evidence to show that he (Atiku) committed any crime or act of corruption whatsoever, in Nigeria or in any country on earth.

    Considering Obasanjo’s yet-to-be diffused anger towards Atiku for his (Atiku’s) almost single-handed truncation of Obasanjo’s infamous Third Term bid, if the Turaki was remotely corrupt, Obasanjo would have given him something far worse than the Alamieyeisigha and Tafa Balogun treatment. As the Americans would say, Obasanjo would have eaten Atiku for dinner. That Atiku is able to move freely, even with Obasanjo still seething with anger towards him is because Atiku’s hands are clean.

    Atiku’s political opponents who are clearly intimidated by and envious of his never-fading political influence and goodwill among Nigerians have consistently floated the false narrative that Atiku is wanted in the United States for criminal activities bordering on money laundering. This evil rumour, which has circulated for very long in Nigeria despite Atiku’s refutation of the allegation, was finally dispelled in November 2016 when the Spokesman of the United States Department of Justice, Mr. Peter Carr said, in response to an enquiry by The Punch Newspaper, that the US has no case against Atiku.

    In an email sent to The Punch which was reported in the newspaper’s edition of November 20, 2016, Carr wrote: “Thank you for reaching out to us. I have checked the public court records, and they do not show cases filed against a defendant named Atiku Abubakar.”

    In his decades-old involvement in politics, Atiku has always come out tops as the leader with the brightest ideas on governance and policy. His views always resonate with the wishes of the people. His policy documents are the best articulated and that Nigeria continues to grapple with poor electric power supply is because the Atiku plan has not been implemented in Nigeria. Atiku’s power strategy is the construction of smaller power generating plants all over Nigeria to serve clusters of people in the areas where these plants are located. Nigeria’s current power strategy has continued to invest and waste billions of dollars on white-elephant power infrastructure that have continued to produce darkness, decades after.

    Which of Atiku’s opponents can match the Turakin Adamawa’s job creation acumen and record? Which of them has Atiku’s pedigree in business and financial management? Which, among them, can equal Atiku’s track-record in human resources development? Are these not some of the most important qualities a person aspiring to national leadership should possess?

    Nigerians should look at the origin of the Stop-Atiku-Project and see it for what it is – a vengeful and selfish reputation-destruction mission embarked upon by a tiny but influential group of envious politicians embittered by Atiku’s intimidating track-record of enviable achievements, and his growing capacity to sweep the polls in any free and fair electoral contest.

    Atiku’s traducers should play fair in politics. Politics is majorly a contest of ideas; and the superior ideas captured in manifestoes and policies, win the votes. They should come up with governance ideas that will best Atiku’s own. For it is in the purveyance of great ideas that Atiku holds the ace. Atiku’s traducers should not resort to lies, character assassination, conspiracy theories and hitting below the belt to destroy the man. Discerning Nigerians are already beginning to see through the smokescreen and the tide is now turning the way of Atiku.

    For Atiku’s traducers, I leave them with the immortal words of William Cullen Bryant; that “Truth crushed to earth shall rise again. The eternal years of God are hers; by error wounded, writhes in pain, and dies among her worshippers.”

    Udenna Orji, writer, businessman and political analyst lives in Abuja.