Tag: Deal Breakers

  • TNG Deal Breakers: When the world changed… were we alive?

    TNG Deal Breakers: When the world changed… were we alive?

    Over the past two decades, there have been several attempts by governments in Nigeria to find alternatives to imported wheat flour used mainly in bread making. Cassava flour was forcefully promoted as a replacement or complete option in the quest for fair comparative advantage to boost local production as well as reduce dependence on imports and the number of dollars spent on flour-dependent foods.

    About the same period, New Rice for Africa (NERICA) was promoted by the West African Rice Development Agency. Nerica is a hybrid, rain-fed specie of rice developed through a collaboration between African and Asian scientists. The pilot scheme in Nigeria across the six geopolitical zones showed early promises that indicated that if we remained on track, rice imports will end. NERICA is now RiceAfrica. This specie of rice has won many global awards not only because of its super yield but combined with its rich protein content, it is helping to solve the world’s hunger crises where it is needed most –– Africa.  

    In Kenya, a newly developed hybrid climate-resistant corn seed, DroughtTEGO. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation claims that this ‘magic seed’ is producing an average of 66% more grain per acre. There is indeed more research into how to boost agricultural harvest to feed Africa. International agencies and foundations account for nearly 80% of these efforts.

    Most Nigerians self-glorified their own brand of resilience and patted themselves for the superior gene of the African, nay Nigerian, which resisted the Covid-19 pandemic. “They thought we would die in numbers, like chickens on the roads”, many enthused. But while the dance to the pyrrhic victory was going on, the world had changed. And behold we were affected far worse than physical death –– massive job loss, more unemployment, and more people streaming into extreme poverty. There was also crops failure occasioned by extreme weather conditions and insecurity of farmer spaces and farmlands. Then we discovered that the prices of food were increasing daily.

    We learnt the importance of Russian and Ukraine to bread and other pastries. We became aware that “14 African nations relied on Ukraine and Russia for half their wheat. Now, those shipments were cancelled, and the supply shock spiked the price of replacement wheat to its highest level in 40 years. Prices eventually started falling in May, but in the Interim, there were the makings of a modern famine, with world leaders sounding the alarm bell, calling for an influx of aid—money and pallets of food to be shipped to sub-Saharan ports immediately.” It is now evident that the Covid-19 and grain shipment cancellations affected us in numbers.  Our government relied on food aid from Europe which the government of the day channeled towards the North East only. Certainly, with no tools to predict the food cycle majority of the population was dragged into poverty without the essential things of everyday living.

    Moses Ojeisekhoba, Swiss Re’s Chief Executive Officer, Reinsurance, is a Nigerian and British. He has granted me permission to adapt his article, “Where were you when the world changed” to our peculiar environment. But to get the full grasp of this piece, I had prefaced it with the many opportunities and policies that would have spared this country the serious poverty index which has dangerously escalated in the last decade. While the rest of the world kept pace with the dynamics of an evolving world order using tools to predict and reorder the mechanics of existence on earth, Nigeria ignores the important instruments of resilience and governance structures that promote sustainability. Aside from these acts of negligence, the government does not pay attention to statistics which today has evolved into the powerful data tool driving economies.

    Ojeisekhoba says; “The pandemic and Ukraine invasion have accelerated the transition to a multi-polar world order, with a few large powers creating something distinct from the unipolar system that emerged from the Cold War. The dimensions of the shift may be open to debate, but it’s clear the current system is moving rapidly to something new. Re/insurers are partnering with clients and society to shape and stabilise this new era, as supply chain, climate and food and energy security risks grow more complex.

    Peeling back the layers of human history, we see patterns that observers likely missed at the moment. For instance, the Sumerians and Egyptians who began drafting the first written records 5,000 years ago may not have immediately grasped the revolution they were unleashing. There probably wasn’t somebody standing there by the Nile saying, “I was there when the world changed.”

    Even so, time and perspective had taught us how this marked the juncture when humankind emerged from its pre-historic darkness, clearing the way for the rapid development of religion, education, philosophy, science, and law – in short, the foundations of modern civilisation. Nothing would ever be the same again.”

    He affirmed that the world has arrived at a “critical turning point for civilisation: The transition from a unipolar to a multi-polar world order and referencing Swiss Re’s latest sigma publication, entitled “Maintaining resilience: the role of P&C insurers in a new world order,” he declared; “our experts document forces shaping this new paradigm. In the making for some time, this shift has been catalysed by both the pandemic and war in Ukraine.”

    The nature of the new world order

    “This new order is a more fragmented construct than what followed World War II. The dominant system of governance and cooperation is unravelling, probably irreversibly, posing challenges to the multilateralism we once counted on to promote global stability. Power centres such as China, Europe, India and the United States are set to redefine multilateralism, not exactly abandoning cooperation, but instead pursuing relationships more strongly defined by their individual interests.

    Amid this sea change, we see a role for P&C re/insurers, to facilitate as orderly a transition as possible. More than ever, our industry must step forward as an agent of societal resilience.

    Among the first significant new order features to emerge from the pandemic and Ukraine invasion is the re-alignment of supply chains to avoid future crisis-driven trade disruptions.”

    Smoothing complexity of a rebooting system

    This rebooting system, “with relocated facilities running in parallel, will require insurance solutions to smooth how business is conducted. Companies must increasingly harness data to overcome heightened complexity that will now accompany getting products from factories to customers, and insurance solutions will be critical in enabling this transition.

    To mitigate climate change’s existential threat, the shift to a green economy was already unavoidable. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has only heightened urgency, as leaders fret over energy security. Such a transition extends far beyond renewable energy, as virtually every element of the global economy requires reconfiguration in order to meet climate goals.

    A third defining feature of this emerging order dominated by multi-polar blocs of economic influence is the potential for worsening disruptions to food supplies, a scenario that would accelerate widening inequality. Food prices were rising before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; the invasion poured fuel on the fire. The most vulnerable are hurting the most.

    Large swathes of Africa and south Asia face acute hunger while the United Nations says the number of people just a stumble away from famine has more than doubled since 2019 to 345 million; many are children. This problem is multi-faceted –– from energy costs, and fertilizer and grain supplies to climate-driven drought and the challenges inherent to feeding a growing population.

    That’s why agriculture insurance, from parametric drought solutions to products that smooth out volatile production costs, is expected to assume a more important role in managing growing risks stemming from a multi-polar world order’s impact on the food-production value chain. Public-private partnerships involving the insurance industry will also be essential, to boost protection in markets that historically have been underserved”.

    When the world changed

    The world has changed! Changed in ways that it seems the whole world is in a rate race. The fast-paced existence demands that nations in Africa must walk the talk of self-reliance.  “As a new multi-polar world order takes shape”, and rapidly redefines the way we perceive and respond to conditions of living, it is imperative that Nigeria demonstrates that leadership that situates it in Africa.

    Ojeisekhoba notes, “while it may have taken humankind centuries to put previous shifts — including the one ignited by written communication, to return to my initial example — into their revolutionary place, technology now at our fingertips makes it possible to quickly assess, understand, and respond in real-time to the new order taking shape this time.

    This is what I call data-driven risk knowledge. As re/insurers, it gives us the power to be the architects of our destinies, not merely passive observers of events. When we recall this moment in history, I’m optimistic we’ll be able to say that when the world changed in 2022, our industry was there not just to maintain resilience, but to strengthen it.”

    In all these, is Africa taken into consideration? Has the most populous black nation on earth read through the myth or reality of the emerging world order? How is Nigeria aligning with the productive currents that deliver much control in our hands instead of being squeezed in-between forces that is out of our control? Nations are rising and falling but ours is only the impetus to rise, to challenge ourselves to be the best we can be in defence of the children, women and youths. We must not show ourselves to be men who beg other nations for food. The new world order will revolve around countries getting stronger unto themselves. Interdependence will always remain part of humankind’s ways of exchange but going forward, it will be defined by strengths and weaknesses.

    We have also arrived at a critical juncture when we have to do a programmed catch-up with what is happening to our world. Those who plan to govern the country post-2023 general elections must with open hands embrace the new ways of doing things. The national interest must well be defined, strategically, to lead all policies of the government.

     

    The original author of this adapted article, Moses Ojeisekhoba, studied Statistics at the University of Ibadan. He is the CEO, of Reinsurance at Swiss Re, the world’s largest reinsurer.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: The untapped opportunity of sports insurance in Nigeria

    TNG Deal Breakers: The untapped opportunity of sports insurance in Nigeria

    By Ifeanyi Ugwuadu

    Many will recall the national tragedy several years ago when one of Nigeria’s brilliant midfielders, Sam Okwaraji slumped and died during a live match at the national stadium in Lagos. At the same world cup qualifier, seven fans reportedly choked to death due to overcrowding. Earlier in 1979, 24 fans reportedly died during a stampede at a semi-final FA cup encounter in Lagos. The just concluded National Sports Festival, Asaba 2022, recorded the death of an athlete, Chukwuemeka Igboanugo who died in the boxing ring. 

    Tragedies such as these are certain risks which ought to be insured and victims and their families compensated. Arenas such as national stadiums and other small venues for sporting activities ought to be covered against the potential danger of accidents that have been recorded at various venues in the country.

    The world’s sports insurance business is projected to reach $600bn in the next three years. By 2025, global insurance underwriters is expected to generate this much revenue from sports-related risks transferred to the industry.  Statista’s revenue estimate for Nigeria in the sports & outdoor segment is estimated to reach US$112.20m in 2022.  At a cumulative annual growth rate of 7.45% over the next 5 years, revenue will hit a volume of US$160.70m by 2027. 

    Most of this revenue would come from sports and outdoor items like clothing, and shoes, as well as sports and outdoor equipment (fitness equipment), and swimming accessories.  Track and jogging suits worn for sporting activities, lifestyle apparel by sportswear brands, footwear for sports purposes, athletic apparel and footwear worn for leisure.

    Revenues from sports underwriting accrue from mostly exposure to third-party liability and accident risks to which professional sports people are exposed. Sporting venues, professional leagues, event organisers, and clubs are exposed to additional risks, including physical damage to infrastructure and equipment, general liability, directors’ and officers’ liability, business interruption, and event cancellation.” Disability and accident insurance is a key risk management tool for professional athletes and teams that can face considerable earning losses in case of injuries.

    These activities when fully insured by club owners, academies, schools’ inter-house sports, universities and Polytechnic games can really deepen the role of sports in harnessing youth development in the country. In this article, we will explore the wider scope of how insurance can contribute to deepening sports development in the country.

    Sports Policy

    Only last month, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved Nigeria’s first ‘sports as a business policy’, National Sports Industry Policy (NSIP). The Sports Ministry leadership sees this as the “birth of a business model that will attract private investment through government incentives underpinned by a new sports code of governance for sporting federations.” This policy document is essentially the counterpart to Sports Nigeria, an initiative of the Nigerian Economic Summit Group (NESG) and stakeholders in the country’s sports industry which is aimed at charting a “business-oriented pathway for sports development in Nigeria.

    According to promoters of Sports Nigeria, the objective of the private sector-led program is to aggregate the quantum of investment required to harness and deploy “investment and private sector funds across the value chain by implementing strategies for developing sports as a platform for economic, social, physical and youth development. 

    At the official launch of Sports Nigeria, the sponsors described it as “a private sector-led intervention agency established to foster the development of the sports industry in Nigeria.” What this implies is that Nigeria never had a national sports policy to drive the development of the various aspects of commercial physical activity and may have relied for decades on the questionable framework –– a case-by-case basis, to drive sports activities in the country. Sad as this may appear, it provides all stakeholders with an equal opportunity to develop sports.

    Football presents Nigeria with the best possible pathway towards developing the sports industry. Financial models already show that teams that have the best collective insurable value tend to outperform others, particularly the national teams. However, the potential for growth of individual athletes in various other sports depends on the worth of the financial value and this can be the basis for the underwriting of the insurance needs of our national teams and local clubs. The result would be a growing confidence among youths who may wish to engage in professional sports at home. The practice sport creates risks and only some of those risks can be covered by regular insurance policies. However, “insurance needs of professional players and teams are highly sophisticated and require specialised coverages that are mostly provided by the Lloyd’s of London market as well as by a limited number of property and casualty insurance companies.

    Organic Growth Prospects

    To achieve organic growth, the national sports policy should as a matter of inclusiveness and further boosting of the development of government and the private sector policy in this regard, integrate specialized insurance for sports in the country. This type of insurance covers aspects of risks outside the general accident and injury policy.

    A report by DBRS Morning Star, the World’s fourth largest credit ratings agency and market in Canada, the United States and much of Europe forecasts an exponential growth in revenue reaching up to US$600 billion in 2025. “The global expansion of the professional sports industry combined with the varying type of its insurance needs has resulted in the exponential growth of the sports insurance business in the past few years”, It stated.

    Insurance powerhouse, Lloyd’s alone generated premiums of over £150 million in a sports-related accident and health insurance. 

    Lloyd’s syndicates have developed detailed models to calculate the insurable values of national teams. Based on this, they have used this to successfully predict the outcome of the last two FIFA World Cups except for the current World Cup, which placed England ahead of the other teams. 

    Notwithstanding, the core logic for the model which predicts the best performance for national teams based on their “higher collective insurable values” supports various reward models. England with the insurable value of £3.17 billion has the highest estimated insurable value. The second and third national teams with the highest insurance values in the tournament are France, with £2.66 billion and Brazil, with £2.56 billion, respectively. Brazil and England have already exited the tournament.

    Sport Development Framework

    Only a few months ago, Nigerians celebrated Tobi Amusan, the athlete that conquered the athletic world. Imagine a Tobi Amusa declaring that she was insured by a local insurer for her professional engagements. The awareness of insurance that would have heralded such pronouncement will be unequalled in its effect on the national sporting psyche. Sports has proved to be the most unifying of all activities in all parts of the world, especially in international championships where only a select few are called up to represent the nation. Insurance is an asset that can be deployed to raise the value of sports activities.

    For grassroots development of special and general insurance, the best place to start (and I do hope the Sports Nigeria and National Sports Industry Policy took this into consideration) is the Local Government Area where respective sports are most popularly played. Indeed all levels of sporting require the insurance component to cover ordinary risks of injury and disability including supplementary life income if the disability is so severe as to threaten a career or prevent the optimal performance of an athlete. 

    Other enumerated areas where genuine data can be generated for underwriting considerations include; sports clubs in Nigeria, primary schools, and secondary, and tertiary schools where respective sports are popular. Derivable from this exercise will be the percentage level of development of the respective sporting activity and an offer of insurance protection. Another level of data needed will be the number of coaches available and required for each sporting activity.

    Asaba 2022 just ended apparently without government-backed insurance for all participating athletes. Even if there were a global cover for all participants, the competition would have provided an opportunity to demonstrate the protection insurance provides for the enhancement of this activity.  In particular, the attention would be drawn to compensation paid to the family of the boxer, Chukwuemeka Igboanugo who died on active duty. Attendance at national competitions, the number of LGA and States competitions organized would have given a general idea about the scope and the required numbers to grow the sport. Insurance can be a motivational instrument for an athlete to commit to his best quality with an assurance that whatever happens to him, his needs and welfare have been factored into a benefits scheme that includes insurance.

    Maturing sports industry in Nigeria would require professional clubs to buy disability insurance for key players to protect themselves financially as they may be “obligated to continue paying an injured player’s salary under a guaranteed contract”. Event sponsors can also buy disability insurance for certain athletes to protect athletes.

    The Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting squeeze on sports and other entertainment events would have tasked clubs if they had to pay athletes throughout the period. Business interruption such as event cancellation insurance protects the insured party against the loss of income that a business suffers as a result of a covered peril that triggers a suspension of its activity.

    Many cases throughout history have provided valuable insights for sports organisations looking to mitigate losses resulting from event cancellations. Moreover, the insurance industry provides the expertise and capital required to provide sizable coverages for professional stadiums and arenas.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: Now that tenure limits kick in finally at 10, what NEXT

    TNG Deal Breakers: Now that tenure limits kick in finally at 10, what NEXT

    Sometimes exchanging pleasantries could veer off, unintentionally to some serious and sensitive matter that may become unpleasant to one party and a revelation to the other. Such was the case when I met an insurance chief executive at a function. After the usual banters about the industry, the socio-economic space and how everyone is managing to keep fit, then I asked about life as an ex-CEO of Xyz Company. Immediately, he retorted, “I am still there as the CEO.” On seeing the surprised look on my countenance, he volleyed yet one more, “Am I too old to still be the CEO.” Out of politeness, I assured him that he was still very agile and in fact and at his best. Case rested!

    However, as I rolled over this information quietly, I realized how many careers had become stagnant as a result of one man remaining a CEO for more than two decades. Movement is essential in life. Without movement, stagnation is inevitable. This holds true also for corporate existence. The freshness that comes with constant change and exchange, the ebbing of the old and the budding of new talents are as essential to productivity as blood circulation is to keep the body healthy. Many insurance companies are no longer creating because the impulse from external that could inspire such have been resisted. The sit-tight syndrome seems to be more pronounced in the insurance industry and the result is multidimensional stifled growth.

    A jaundiced Corporate Governance    

    Supposedly, six years ago (precisely July 1, 2016) the Code of Corporate Governance which incubated the tenure limits regulation for boards of directors should have been in force. It failed to kick in for the insurance industry because powerful CEOs downed its implementation. The major challenge of the regulation was that being driven by the Financial Reporting Council and Securities and Exchange Commission, it thus required to cross regulatory buy-in and adoption by different industry regulators. In addition, some BODs with their CEOs had resisted compliance viewing it as meddlesomeness.  

    Overall, this governance code entails a reengineering of corporate governance processes and structures. The code seeks to strengthen the boards of companies so they can perform their policymaking and oversight functions more effectively and without hindrances. Compliance with the demands of this regulation will definitely bring about increased value for shareholders. There is a caveat here! Shareholder value will only accrue to companies which seek skills for board positions and not those that comply with patronage and seek to hold self-serving control and influence over board activities.

    As of 2016, at least 2 out of each company board member of the 58 underwriting companies would have been affected. Most incumbent CEOs would have also vacated their positions. This postulation excludes major brokers and loss adjusters. Indeed compliance with the spirit of the regulation will aggregate the best skills for the industry and a factor of differentiation. A lot has since changed since then – Mergers and Acquisitions have changed the board landscape. Yet some CEOs who have acquired tremendous financial power and control of their firms are holding strong to their positions.

    Proactively, some enterprises in leading positions across sectors did not wait for this code because these entities are building on international best practices. Many such firms started earlier to implement frameworks that enhance corporate governance like Corbit5, Balanced Scorecard, and so on. However, implementing governance principles only may not be helpful if the presiding CEOs have run out of ideas. It must be a top-down holistic process embracing all the enterprise tentacles. Aside from process innovation which the Code enforces, business innovation is key to insurance survival. Therefore, ventilating the market and allowing fresh ideas to flow in is key to growing the market.

    Talent, Skills Competition 

    Naturally, competition for the best talents to occupy the highest corporate positions should drive every enterprise’s talent and skills acquisition policies and processes. Incidentally, all corporate organisations registered under CAMA are required to implement the 10-year tenure limit for directors including CEOs. Had all organisations taken off at the same time six years ago, this would have driven a very refreshing competitive talent and skills acquisition hunt to fill vacant positions. For insurance, industry-specific guidelines for succession are too restrictive to acquire fresh hands externally except the same market environment. The insurance market will be looking for skills in the market alongside the banks and others whose remuneration is far more attractive than that of insurers. However, if insurers redefine the role and functions of each director as well as carry out a thorough skills gap analysis, they need not fret over the apparent dearth of skills and possible competition with other ‘’better paying’’ institutions. 

    The Companies and Allied Matters Act, Cap. C20, states; “The board should develop a written, clearly defined, formal and transparent procedure for appointment to the board of directors. The board shall specify and document the criteria for appointing directors. Such criteria should embrace the strengths and weaknesses of the existing board, required skills, and experience as well as current age range and gender diversity.”

    Viewed from the above provision and the entire requirements for board appointments, the law intended to strengthen the selection process and the appointment of an independent director consolidates this.

    Now a new shot at exiting old CEOs, Execs

    From January 2023, NAICOM has issued a one-year transition guideline for the disengagement of CEOs and executive directors who have overstayed 10 years. In exercising “its powers under the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) Act 1997 and in line with the Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance 2018”, the regulator indicated a fresh push to implement maximum tenure limits for executive directors of insurance and reinsurance companies operating in Nigeria. It believes the action is essential to “sanitize the industry and ensure the sector continues to operate with international best practices.”

    “There shall be a transitional period of 12 months from the effective date of this circular in respect of existing appointments; all CEOs and EDs who have served for 10 years shall cease to continue in such capacity, after the transition period of 12 months; henceforth, all insurers/reinsurers shall give consideration to the provisions of the circular in their future engagement of CEOs and EDs and the circular takes effect from 1st of January, 2023,” the regulator pointed out.

    Mandate to Freshen the Board

    No doubt the quality and independence of any board play vital roles in the success or failure of the enterprise. The national code of corporate governance underscores the importance of this perspective. A board membership that is composed of persons representing the interests of major shareholders will only do the bidding of the benefactors. To a large extent what one has been acquainted with over time are boards’ compositions that reflect only the ownership structure, and thus such directors’ roles are ‘as directed’ and are unable to influence the growth of the company. This situation has periled so many businesses in the country either as family businesses or organizations set up with capital market funding. 

    Thus the requirement for enterprises to seek requisite skills for board positions and tenure limits imposed thereby will breathe some freshness into Nigerian companies. An adjunct to this requirement is the continued need to put processes in place so that resource misallocation, mismanagement, fraud and like vices in the workplace would be minimized. 

    Job Creation through process reengineering 

    To replenish the insurance market with new creative talents should be a task the industry should take seriously. Intelligent and brilliant graduates of business, marketing, insurance and actuarial sciences must be targeted to create a new pool of talent for the market. Engineering, statisticians, data analysts and other specialized fields hold the future of a more inclusive talent for the industry.  These are the ones to bring growth initiatives that can expand the market and create more jobs. The widespread absence of career progress due to constricted movement at the top, middle and lower levels of employment is not creating room for expansion. Although the economic downturn may be blamed for the current inability of organizations to hire, the insurance market’s hiring capacity has stagnated for a long time already.

    Innovations in Insuretech are providing a new window for insurance to expand and this now presents a justification for the wider net of professionals. The talents to operate these models are the younger tech-savvy generation. And they are here waiting to be tapped. To complement this wave of technology, old talents need to give way. A new generation is required to change the course of insurance in Nigeria. Beyond tenure limits for directors and CEOs, insurance business owners may have to implement a complete talent cleanup. In addition, the Chartered Insurance Institute of Nigeria may have to revolutionize its syllabuses to bring it up-to-date with current realities. Underwriting is now tech-driven! It (CIIN) should now look in the direction of transforming into an Insurance Business school or its courses would lose relevance.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: A symphony of insurance welfare principles and the Balance Sheet

    TNG Deal Breakers: A symphony of insurance welfare principles and the Balance Sheet

    Not many Nigerians are aware that insurance operate a model of business that combines social welfare principles with strict business profit and loss features. Insurance claims may at times be honoured on the basis of emotions and empathy towards the insured who suffered a loss of assets. Many Nigerians have received payments from insurers not based on the strict conditions and terms of the policy but on the purely human basis that this claimant needed to be lifted and helped, even supplanting processes to ensure that the policyholder gets a benefit for, at least, taking insurance.

    Although insurers are heavily taxed for things they ought not to pay considering the components and nature of their earnings, still they are able to enable discretionary obligations to their customers. Factually, if insurers were to investigate the actual causes of losses for which they pay billions annually, over 30% of such claims would not be paid on account of their not meeting the business conditions for underwriting.  Yet they pay! They may contest claims only when there is an obvious attempt to defraud the underwriter. Insurance relies on the principle of the proximate cause of the incident and not the exact cause.

    In very ideal cases, insurers and other suppliers of insurance products bond into a lasting relationship with the insured such that a mutual understanding exists which precludes any foul play between them. And this is the foundation upon which insurance thrives –– Trust and Utmost Good Faith. Perhaps, it is this part of the insurance principle that many would want to take advantage of and sometimes expect that insurance is provided for free. Insurance is also an intangible service where a physical product is not traded and the value is universally predetermined and bargained by both supplier and buyer. Thus, to connect people to insurance services, an ecosystem is developed where the purchase is system-driven. This is the system found in developed economies where insurance is ringed to economic and social activities. In Nigeria and most African countries, the value insurance creates is not well perceived by the larger population. And government regulations in this regard are mostly private-sector induced but only get a stamp of approval. African governments appear to distance themselves from the legislation which have their seal of approval.

    Affordable Social Insurance

    The majority of our population is unaware that claims can be made on victims of hit-and-run accidents and other third-party victims of road accidents. The legal system also is not robust enough to encourage lawyers to specialize in these cases due to funding issues to prosecute such cases.

    Aside from the settlement of claims on regular insurance contracts based on the existing business relationship between the insurer and the policyholder and or other intermediaries, public insurance programs exist that provide financial protection against many kinds of economic risks. Disability, Income loss due to ill health, old age or unemployment are some forms of social insurance that provide insurance against economic risks. It may be provided publicly or through subsidizing of private insurance. Public auto insurance, health, unemployment and social security are social insurance programs. Mainly they target the underserved ad disadvantaged population.  

    The mandatory insurances are basically third-party liabilities which are subsidized with grants for insurance development. Even at the low price and subsidy level, there is no significant uptake of the motor third party, building under construction insurance, public building insurance, and health insurance.

    The federal government legislated that these insurances listed are mandatory. Therefore, the premium pricing is subsidized so that it can be affordable. The private insurance entities participate because it is envisaged to be a pool of critical mass of the population with all concerned paying their fair share to provide protection for the greater part of the population. Due to the low awareness of the economic necessity of the programs and the government’s unwillingness to pursue vigorous enforcement, these essential programs have failed or partially succeeded in some instances.

    Pricing Issues

    Though insurance practitioners approach their customers with the utmost consideration, the balance sheet items that translate to profit and loss are part of the equation. The fact that most underwriters have not invested in mandatory social insurance programs is a function of price. The prices are not market-driven because they are regulated by the government. For instance at N5,000 third-party motor insurance with a limitless death claim, it will be suicidal for any insurer to invest in driving sales marketing without government support. After commissions, tax, levies and claims, it is not certain if any insurer can post a profit on Third party auto insurance on a standalone basis.

    The first place to start is to review the prices upwards to enable active private insurance participation. Then the government should make a tangible subsidy input to make it sustainable. If the roads are well maintained and tolled, then a sizable amount for government support would be realized while the government pays its contribution to a dedicated pool for motor accident disability insurance.

    A New CSR Window: How insurance can mobilize for social insurance   

    Motor insurance is the oldest compulsory insurance in Nigeria. If government strengthens its institutions, no vehicle can possibly be on the road without insurance. Generally, transport accident insurance itself is mandatory on account of the lives of passengers conveyed. For all types of compulsory insurance, the industry should go outside the domain and choose credible and influential people as committee members to oversee funds for the various mandatory insurance.

    The insurance regulatory agency annually appropriates 20% of its income for the security and insurance development Funds while insurers are meant to keep a certain percentage levy on the gross motor income for defined compensation to victims of road accidents. For more efficient results, the security and insurance development fund may be further split into the types of mandatory insurance with the constitution of these committees for each.  These compulsory insurance board memberships will become the pivot to drive the implementation of the programs. They would be composed of people whose statements are newsy and can achieve the highest impact in believability. Additional qualifications should be people whose statements can influence government action and policy implementation.

    Out of these mandatory board committees, private insurers in partnership with the government can launch specific awareness campaigns on the various regulated insurance with an overall target on the direct beneficiaries. As a boost, every beneficiary of the security fund would be published to drive home the fact that real people are being impacted by insurance.  The numbers and verifiable statistics are essential to achieve trust.  

    Motor Messages & Third Party Liability

    A vital dataset missing in FRSC road transport accident reports is the number of insured vehicles that were involved in the incidents collated. The road safety commission is an important stakeholder that should be encouraged to deepen its reports. With such reports, digital auto platforms with integrated claims management systems can help identify insurers of the affected vehicles with the aim of initiating claims on behalf of victims’ families or injured passengers.

    Road transport statistics obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics confirm this pattern of reporting by FRSC. A total number of 5,263 vehicles were involved in 3,282 road traffic accidents for Q2 2022. This number was further disaggregated to fatal, serious and minor accident categories. This report did not indicate if the vehicles were insured or not. The obligations of the FRSC to road accident victims in regard to insurance go further than the report indicates.

    Zonal profiling shows that the highest number of fatal accidents happened in zones with the least insurance penetration with the exception of South West which came a distant second after North Central for the highest number of accidents. What this picture presents is a trend which should give the government an inkling of where the greatest attention is needed if accident insurance and motor insurance are to be enabled for the protection of citizens. Commercial vehicles record the highest number of accidents, which is a compelling reason to amend and enforce stricter social insurance programs.

    Therefore, what should be mandatory alongside auto insurance is accident insurance. It is not sufficient to offer a third party with a focus on asset liability. Instead, the emphasis should be on death and injury to passengers. And pricing would then reflect this.  The same should also apply to mandatory insurance.

    For the kind of awareness that can stick, insurers in collaboration with National Insurance Commission can buy, and brand Federal Road Safety Corps vehicles on the highways and build presence and perception on the roads.

    The branding will include a peculiar uniform for highway patrol teams. Alongside clear messaging on patrol vehicles, many people will see what benefits insurance brings. Emergency situations and the activity of special marshals will help create the impression that passersby and witnesses can spread with word of mouth.

    Other Mandatory Insurances

    Public buildings and Buildings under construction insurance are essentially third-party liability policies meant to compensate ordinary people. However, poor implementation and indifference by the government since 2003 have made it unworkable. The same subtle approach to sensitization may also be used here. Penalties for non-compliance should be a part requirement for approval by State and Federal governments. In addition, building associations, and institutes such Nigeria Institute of Building should only certify members who obtain annually renewable professional indemnity cover.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: The pension-linked mortgage, NH-Fund devoid of insurance

    TNG Deal Breakers: The pension-linked mortgage, NH-Fund devoid of insurance

    One of the most defining moments in the life of a man is when he moves into his own house, wakes up on his own and proceeds to his daily work from his own house. The feeling is like someone who has accomplished a great milestone, no matter how small the house. And it is indeed a great milestone. This is the reason that most organizations incentivize the workforce with a housing loan when they are qualified for it. Aside from being a motivation for increased productivity, it engenders commitment to organizational goals by the employees because it solves one of the basic necessities of life. Food and clothing, the other basic needs are usually ongoing and never milestones. Therefore, a national housing policy that leaves out linkages with the various housing funds will achieve little to meet the needs of the majority of Nigerians.

    Conventional practice dictates that where a mortgage is presented, mortgage insurance comes into play to reduce the financial outlay that would have been the case if the entire 25 to 30 per cent equity is to be paid by the borrower. However, pension mortgage borrowing presents a rather difficult and complex situation. Insurance was not factored into the guidelines issued by the National Insurance Commission (PenCom). What can be inferred is that pension asset managers and insurers did not come together in a bid to fashion a product that would have a tremendous effect on pension savers.

    This product and similar other products would have a positive impact only when it is framed to benefit the saver and not the duration that money would be in the management of PFAs to make it profitable. The return on investment for asset owners should be the first line of thinking for those initiating and developing these products. This may be the reason for the slow uptake of the product by retirement savings account holders. In addition, the conditions for the so-called borrowing are themselves disincentives to those who qualify for the borrowing.

    The real estate sector in Nigeria has struggled for decades contributing less than an average of 7 per cent to GDP and under one per cent to employment. In terms of contribution to GDP growth, the sector has been declining for the most part of the last 5 years.  And compared to the rest of the world it is the largest sector in countries like the US and Australia in terms of contributions to GDP and also provides the largest employers in Australia.  The failure of the real estate sector in Nigeria stems from a weak salary structure and wrong incentivizing for commercial players. The bulk of those targeted to swell housing funds are salary and self-employed whose mandatory or voluntary contributions are very insignificant for the pool of resources demanded. 

    Constitutional Right to shelter

    Access to decent, affordable, quality shelter is a fundamental human right guaranteed under section 16 (2) (d), of the Constitution of Nigeria. Expressly, it provides that the “State shall direct its policy towards ensuring suitable and adequate shelter for all citizens.”

    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also enjoins national governments the right to a standard of living adequate for the individual’s family’s health and well-being, including food, clothing, housing, medical care, and necessary social services.

    The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), a multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly with Nigeria as a signatory, also guarantees the right to housing as part of an adequate standard of living. This does not only mean having a roof over one’s head, but it also includes the right to live in safety and dignity in a decent home. It also means affordability, the security of tenure, protection against forced evictions, and availability of services, such as access to drinking water, energy, or transportation.

    Furthermore, as a party to the Covenant, Nigeria is expected to ensure that all enjoy all components of the right to adequate housing, including the security of tenure, access to services and infrastructure, affordability, habitability, accessibility, and location in proximity to services.

    The disconnect of NHF, pension mortgage with reality

    Before the Pension industry packaged mortgages, there were the NH-Fund, private mortgage institutions, and the Mortgage Refinance Company. Their intentions are similar –– to bridge the huge housing deficit. Unfortunately, these efforts are not linked together. The core service of mortgage insurance is not factored such as reducing the equity contribution through premiums. It is doubtful if insurers’ input was sought on the basis of what works for other well-developed housing markets. 

    The National Housing Fund (NHF) was established by the NHF Act of 1992 to mobilize funds that will facilitate the provision of affordable housing for Nigerians. Under the law, every Nigerian earning N3,000 or more per annum must contribute 2.5 per cent of their basic monthly salary to the NHF. However, on 18 February 2019, the law was repealed and replaced in 2018 with an Act of the National Assembly. The minimum wage replaced the N3,000 provision in the earlier legislation.

    Other defining provisions of the new law include;

      Mandatory 2.5% contribution of monthly income by employees earning minimum wage and above in public and private sectors to be deducted and remitted monthly by all employers 

      2.5% of income by self-employed individuals  

      2.5% levy on cement, locally produced or imported 

      10% profit before tax minimum investment by insurance companies, banks and pension fund administrators into the NHF at an interest rate not exceeding one per cent above the rate payable on current accounts by banks.

    Significant downsides of NHF, residential mortgage equity contribution

    If proper linkages were established, the National Housing Fund would have benefited from the more flexible pension mortgage equity contribution of the RSA holders. When combined, the two can rise significantly for each contributor, particularly the low-income groups. 

      In the case of PenCom’s equity contribution for a residential mortgage, there were no housing models and packages that will suit the various categories of contributors under the management of PFAs. To prequalify contributors only on the basis of the various fund categories is too simplistic. If the guidelines had indicated, for instance, that contributors under Fund II can bring up applications for houses of N8million to N10million, this would be clearer.

      Aside from the draconian penalty of up to N100 million and N10 million for non-compliance for corporates and individuals respectively, there is also a possible sanction of operating license cancellation for violation by the financial players listed above. The premium, pension and deposit assets under the management of insurers, PFAs (Pension Fund Administrators) and banks respectively have cost implications for the managers and any unfair legislation that mandates them to place such funds in an investment that may not guarantee good yield would be resisted.  

      Pegging access to housing fund by contributors at 60 years or 35 years of service assumes the typical civil service system whereas, in the private sector, early retirements before 45 years is becoming a norm. Harmonizing the exit age for pension mortgage and national housing fund contributors would be a good deal. It would also benefit contributors if the possible exit age could be put at a minimum of 10 years contribution to qualify for withdrawal.

      A 2.5% levy on cement is a property tax that will make housing even less affordable considering that cement input is a major component. There is also no mention of incentives for innovators of purpose-built locally sourced and affordable building inputs.

      Absence of proper education about mortgages and the high rates of defaults by borrowers.

    Red Flags in the mortgage borrowing

    Although findings indicate that no significant activity has been recorded in the pension equity mortgage window, still it is important to not forget the subprime crises in the United States that ushered in the global financial meltdown from 2007 to 2008.  The financial crisis was caused by cheap credit and relaxed lending standards which fueled the housing bubble. The erosion of savings, massive job losses and loss of homes were the outcomes.

    Abrupt and interest rate hikes have always been the bane of mortgages and homeowner defaults that follow. Nigeria’s economy is too skewed to the rich that any attempt to take over homes from people whose life savings had gone into it will be catastrophic. 

    During the subprime crises cited here, many homeowners were unable to afford the increased monthly payments on their subprime loans and were also unable to refinance or sell their homes due to the real estate market slowdown. 

    A subprime mortgage is a type of loan granted to individuals with poor credit scores who wouldn’t qualify for conventional mortgages. Subprime mortgages are now making a comeback as nonprime mortgages. It is hoped that the funds targeting the savings of workers will be carefully weighed and applied so they will not implode.

    In fact, the term, mortgage, used for the pension product negates the principle of and meaning of mortgage in the real practice of the concept. The security of workers’ savings so that it can serve them when it matters most should be uppermost. If mortgage equity should come into play at all, then insurance ought to be factored into it.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: The Naira woes, retiree death scores, pension benefits, and other stories

    TNG Deal Breakers: The Naira woes, retiree death scores, pension benefits, and other stories

    By Ifeanyi Ugwuadu

    The aim of monthly or yearly pension payouts is to mitigate or cushion the likelihood of old age poverty. It is, for this reason, that withdrawal from pension savings after retirement is framed in such a way that the retiree gets so little each time. Whether through an annuity or programmed benefit withdrawal, each piece of the savings flies off without the possibility of another coming in. And the retirees die predictably quicker, unprepared and with little to start off a new phase after years of paid employment. But more worrisome is the fact that death in active service accounted for nearly 88% of the payouts by RSAs since inception. This high percentage of deaths should have triggered a review of the benefit structure in favour of named next-of-kin of the employee. Nigeria presents a unique scenario of the Contributory Pension Scheme owing to various factors peculiar to the country –– ranging from job insecurity, poor remuneration, and inadequate education of the retiree on pension matters. In addition, family and extended family responsibilities weigh heavily on each worker such that there is usually not enough time to plan an exit from paid employment.

    Pensions are also business for the administrators who build their profit out of the long-term management of retirement accounts. Pensions are also a huge source of investable funds and domestic borrowing for the government. So, for Nigeria’s pensions market, there are the Retirement Savings Account (RSA) holders, and then you have government regulators (National Pensions Commissions and National Insurance Commission), Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) and Pension Fund Custodians (PFCs). Insurers and commercial banks make up the remaining parties of interest.

    Depending on what the retiree wishes to do with his savings, the other parties of interest congregate to take out of it. However, the question should be, whose benefits are being parcelled out among these stakeholders? With the free fall of the Naira, who is the loser? It must be stated that the retiree savings has been woefully eroded with unimaginable consequences to the entire system and particularly, those retiring since inception. It is impossible now to predict the worst-case scenario.

    So we have the entire pension scheme set up and supervised by the government. It is managed and run by private sector entities. The private firms are thoughtful enough to hedge their earnings from the employees’ savings but run out of ideas on how to hedge or guarantee the savings in times of hyperinflation such as we have today. Profit considerations and the need to maximize investments are the main drivers of rules to hold on, for as long as possible, the savings.  The earnings for the savers are very low but not so for the pension asset managers.

    You’re Alive only when you are working!

    The average lifespan of a retiree in Nigeria is 3 years! Death in active service accounted for 87.68% of this figure totalling 39,678 while death in retirement totalling 5,563 or 12.32 per cent makes up the balance. Adjusting the death benefits records of the 22 PFAs against duplication and other errors, about 45,241 death benefits were paid by PFAs to the Next-of-Kin of deceased RSA holders from the inception of the Contributory Pensions Scheme (CPS) to 31 May 2020. 

    Real Case

    A 64-year-old retiree who prefers to tell his story anonymously narrated his situation thus; “My PFA said the balance in my Retirement Savings Account (RSA) as at the time I was programmed in 2018 was N10.21 million and that I can only take about N2.5 million as a lump sum. The rest will be paid to me as a monthly pension.  I was diagnosed with heart problems last year, requiring about N3.5 million for surgery abroad to save my life. I returned to my PFA to ask for the balance in my RSA to enable me to pay for treatment abroad and I was told that I cannot take more than my monthly pension, it is what the law provided.  But what if I die now? I asked, and they told me the balance in my RSA will be paid en bloc to my Next-of-Kin.”

    He further queried; “Who should be the priority of PenCom and my PFA, myself that worked and saved the money, or my children who are meant to inherit my estate when I die? We contributed to the RSA so that we can take care of our needs in retirement. Unfortunately, now that my life is hanging on a balance, they are telling me that I cannot take my own money to save my life. They deceived us into saving for comfort in retirement and now that we have retired they are devising ways to hold onto our money until we die. This is deceitful!” he lamented.

    ANALYSIS OF DEATH IN RETIREMENT FROM INCEPTION – MAY 2020
    S/NO DETAILS TOTAL % OF TOTAL
    1 Total Death in Retirement 5,563 100
    2 Death Under 1 Year 2,805 50.42
    3 Death under 2 Years 600 10.79
    4 Death under 3 Years 482 8.66
    5 Death under 4 Years 418 7.51
    6 Death Under 5 Years 352 6.33
    7 Death Under 6 Years 285 5.12
    8 Death Under 7 Years 219 3.94
    9 Death Under 8 Years 168 3.02
    10 Death Under 9 Years 126 2.26
    11 Death Under 10 Years 69 1.24
    12 Death Under 11 Years 30 0.54
    13 Death Under 12 Years 8 0.14
    14 Death Under 13 Years 1 0.02
    Total 5,563 100.00

    From the above statistics, clearly, half the number of retirees die within one year after retirement while 70 per cent of them die within 3 years of retirement and the remaining die within the 10-year guaranteed period.

    These are Nigeria’s pension statistics and confirm that a different approach to dealing with the socio-economic problems should never be benchmarked with world standard methods. This scenario is the background for a groundswell of agitation by pension savers to maximize their exit from the scheme. It is totally insensitive not to pay attention to the glaring statistics that show that many working-class Nigerians do not live up to retirement and when they do eventually retire, most die three years only post-retirement. How does the system justify a 25% lump sum payment while 75% is spread over 15 to 22 years in view of the survival rate of three years? The reverse should be the case. Some retirees are so impoverished that the majority would want to cash out and have indeed approached their PFAs for the same. The time is now to propose an amendment to this regulation and the Pension Reform Act. Pencom should pay heed to the angst against the existing ratio and act quickly. A cashout regulation may also be part of the deal for retirement savings account holders within the scheme.

    Job security and structure of Nigeria’s labour market

    Aside majority of employees in the public sector, job security in the private sector is almost surreal. Figures from the National Statistics Bureau puts current unemployment, underemployment and youth unemployment at 33.3%, 22.8% and 42.5% respectively. These rates are staggering in their effect on the economy and for an uncoordinated labour market, this situation gives total control to employers. The services sector pays comparably better than the public sector and the real sector. In effect, for any existing job, no matter how paltry the salary, more than 10,000 people are willing to take it.

    In the private sector, Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As) are enlarging the already saturated labour market because new investors usually capitalize on weak labour laws and kick out existing employees to evade pension liabilities. The immediate profit target is the savings from layoffs. Thus there is an army of young retirees who are eager to draw down their entire pension savings to start some business on their own. With no possibility of getting another job, this appears to be the only option. But, pension regulation does not have a provision for drawdown by any retiree and those who have attained a minimum of 50 years, can only take a 25% lump sum.

    The Case for 75% lump sum payment

    Unarguably, most retirees prefer a higher lump sum than the 25% regulatory lump sum that the law stipulates.  A bill at the National Assembly is seeking to raise the statutory lump sum from 25% to 75%. However, PenCom and PFAs are opposed to it because it makes the business of managing pensions unattractive and confirms my earlier assertion that the pension scheme is for business owners and not for savers. But at least the system can save the “hen that lays the golden egg” to guarantee the survival of the market that trades on the weakness of savers. It is true that within the subsisting law, the retirees are entitled to only a 25% regulatory lump sum as prescribed in Pension Reform Act 2014.

    In some cases, a 50% lump sum is payable based on the basic salary of the retiree at the point of exit. Unfortunately, many retirees are not well informed about the possibility and mechanism of receiving a 50% lump sum at once. It may be necessary to cover this aspect in a fresh article. The case for a higher lump sum at retirement is justified if trends like the survival rate of retirees, negative real returns on investments, and prevalence of critical and terminal illnesses including the need to engage them in productive activities are considered. Rather than focus on the legal transfer of their savings to those who survive them, the system may be strengthened to help them transit to another productive endeavour that makes life meaningful.

    RECORD OF DEATH BENEFITS PAID BY PFAS FROM INCEPTION TO MAY 2020
    S/NO DETAILS TOTAL % OF TOTAL
    1 Total Number of Deaths Adjusted for Errors 45,241 100
    2 Death in Active Service 39,678 87.68
    3 Death in Retirement (Programmed Withdrawal) 5,563 12.32

    The table above shows the high mortality rate of retirees since the inception of CPS till May 31, 2020. With about 45,241 deaths, post-Covid-19 figures are bound to escalate the number of deaths.  . Death in active service accounted for 87.68% of this figure totalling 39,678 while death in retirement totalling 5,563 or 12.32 per cent makes up the balance.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: Navigating Inland with Ships of Destiny: The Cabotage Transition

    TNG Deal Breakers: Navigating Inland with Ships of Destiny: The Cabotage Transition

    For decades now most Nigerian maritime experts have been worried over the absence or abysmally low capacity of indigenous players in the maritime sector given the fact that more than 80% of Nigeria’s economy is dependent on maritime activities. The crude oil and the import and export trades are sea-bound activities. Wet cargo revenue far outstrips dry cargo. The target has been to deepen Nigerians’ participation in the estimated US$ 10 billion coastal shipping. Investments are usually capital intensive and that is the reason the government’s intervention is vital towards creating impetus.

    Technology and communication earnings certainly do not belong to this equation. Nevertheless, technology may be key to unlocking the potential of the local shipping business. For instance, deploying technologies to vessel dashboards could help minimize thefts. Vessels, ships, crafts, barges and all other marine transportation systems are heavily reliant on foreign inputs. These gulp millions of dollars to acquire. It is along this perspective that one must understand the federal government and NIMASA’s intervention through Cabotage Fund to aid more local participation in sea transport. 

    Domestication of several maritime rules has been championed by several Nigerians who out of patriotism canvass for a reduction to the millions of dollars in exports that could otherwise develop the maritime space. However, the domestication of rules is just one problem. The capacity has to be built up organically such that every resource is available for fully grown services. For instance, Nigeria does not have the required number of admiralty lawyers both at the bench and bar to adjudicate on maritime cases. Of course, there are few Nigerian admiralty lawyers but all of them are practising in London’s Lloyds market. Cases emanating from Nigerian jurisdiction are shipped overseas to be settled there because most charterers and vessel owners are foreigners. Added to the FOB rules for cargoes, it would seem that dominance by overseas traders is affirmed.

    Therefore, the structure required for Nigeria to begin to have some form of domestication of maritime practices would yet have to be deliberately built up. Hand-in-hand with financing ships acquisition, some universities may have to be endowed to open studies in admiralty law as a specialization while academicians could be sponsored by government institutions to acquire the knowledge. The Nigerian Police as well as other prosecutorial ambulation structures will take cues to train personnel for that purpose. 

    Hence, Nigeria could still operate its cabotage businesses; build, register ships, and indigenize shipping for coastal trade and yet parties to any dispute will travel to another jurisdiction for settlement. Specifically, London will definitely host all the cases arising from maritime business disagreements if no trained and knowledgeable manpower is available.

    So-called cabotage is the transportation of passengers and goods between two places in the same country. Originally applying to shipping, port to port, the terms now extend to aviation, railways and road transport is some countries. It pertains to the right to operate a shipping business within a country and therefore, connotes a restriction. Lower insurance costs, lower risk of accidents and a lower rate of piracy attacks and a better guarantee for goods are some of the perceived advantages for charterers.

    The Cabotage Act also known as the Coastal and Inland Shipping Act 2003 seeks to indigenize inland transport business through the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) established under the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act, 2003.

    The US$350million plus US$350million funding

    The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) have taken a firm step in the direction of building the needed capacity. Only recently it announced the federal government’s approval to begin the disbursement of US$350 million in cabotage funds to qualified indigenous operators with a relevant pedigree in shipping. Eleven banks have been shortlisted as primary lending institutions under the scheme. The purpose is for ships, vessels, barges, crafts and so on to be owned and serviced here in the country for any meaningful development to commence.  

    There is another tranche of US$350million for the same purpose through the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board’s Nigerian Content Intervention Fund (NCI Fund). It is hoped this is not the same fund approved for disbursement through NIMASA’s Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF). 

    Altogether, the US$700million from both NIMASA and local NCDMB presents a huge opportunity for the maritime sector, especially locally-owned shipping companies, to develop local capacities in those areas in that Nigeria has complete jurisdiction for coastal shipping.

    Therefore, the objective of disbursing US$700 million is to ensure that “all vessels that engage in coastal shipping in Nigeria are built in Nigeria, owned by Nigerians, manned by Nigerians and registered in Nigeria.” The spillover of this empowerment will be the strengthening of the local insurance capacity for local shipping. In addition, more seafarers trained at such cost to the government will find jobs to deploy their skills. The Nigerian Dockyard will also be amply busy in building to specification the required vessels appropriate for Nigerian waters. 

    Where a vessel is needed in Nigeria but does not meet the requirement of being wholly built, registered and operated in Nigeria and by Nigeria, the law and guidelines provide for a waiver application from the charterer on the particular requirement they are seeking to be waived and ensure that no indigenous capacity is available in that area before recommending to the federal ministry of transportation for approval. Ambiguities as to the classification of some vessels classified as foreign vessels should also be cleared up. These include vessels with foreign registered companies but owned by Nigerians and registered under foreign flags due to the requirements for the financing of such vessels’ acquisition.

    Transitioning  

    But there is a caveat which shades the objective of indigenizing coastal businesses –– the Cabotage Department of NIMASA is to “ensure that the Oil and Gas Industry which is the mainstay of the Nigerian economy and provides over 80% of the cabotage trade business, is not destabilized.” This clause may eventually subvert the cause of building the shipping structures that would operationalize the cabotage business in the country. The reason for this is not far-fetched; currently, transactions are dollar-denominated and most vessels and charterers are foreigners and the movement of oil and petroleum must be constant. The most important of all is the fact that part of NIMASA’s revenues accrues from the 2% levy collection from the gross contract sum of all cabotage vessels in Nigeria. 

    The transition is not going to be very smooth because this 2% revenue will suffer disruption and the caveat to ensure the smooth running of Nigeria’s oil transactions and transportation would certainly pose a roadblock. In this respect, a body of oversight professionals should be constituted to oversee Nigeria’s cabotage transition. It is also doubtful if NIMASA has seen and identified the need for this course of action. If it has taken 19 years and 16 years to activate the Cabotage law and guidelines respectively, then a close scrutiny of the processes should be put in place to see through the operational phase of the vessels acquired by local players. The Ship Building and Ship Acquisition Fund should serve as a lesson on Nigerian soil.

    Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) is the Fund meant to be used to help indigenous operators acquire vessels for tonnage capacity building and gradually take over fully from foreign operators. What these flagships will achieve will determine the future of coastal maritime trade in Nigeria and the milestones will be destined to provide a blueprint for further development of the sector.

    Resources to bank on

    o   The Dangote Refinery is projected to start full operations by 2023. Though fossil fuel is gradually being phased out in developed countries, yet the refining capacity and consumption in the local market would provide ample development opportunities for the cabotage to thrive.  

    o   There are about 2,050 Nigerian seafarers trained by NIMASA with about 800 engaged by mostly foreign shipping lines. Indigenous shipping companies may absorb the rest that is unemployed if they are properly equipped. 

    o   The establishment of other deep seaports in other regions of Nigeria’s vast maritime enclave will support expansion and provide jobs and hubs of activity for many Nigerians. This policy ought to be pursued with vigour in view of the scope expected in the cabotage enactment.

    o   The Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) assisted vessel acquisition funds in support of Nigerian local content in the oil and gas services providing another opportunity to transit from a foreign-dominated space to one populated by Nigerian shippers. The Bank of Industry manages the Nigerian Content Intervention Fund (NCI Fund) established by the Nigerian Content Development Fund. 

    o   It is also important to gazette any waiver on imports of ship-building components to counterbalance the single-digit loans for ship acquisition. 

    Dispute Resolutions

    Any legislation or judgement which cedes crew arbitrage exclusively to the National Industrial Court should be examined as shipping is international and requires accelerated discharge of cases in order to engender confidence. The High Courts should also have jurisdiction over such cases to also develop capacity in this field. Prior to proper constitutional amendment of fresh legislation in this aspect, experts advise that courts when faced with such challenges can constitute a special panel and invite friends of the Court to help in resolving crew claims disputes. Charterer issues have their own complications which may not immediately be ventured into by Nigerian courts.

    It is in this light that the efforts to entrench informed maritime decisions by the courts should also be viewed. The yearly training of judges through the collaboration of the Nigerian Maritime Law Association and the National Judicial Institute should be supported by the government. In like manner, the Cabotage Implementation Forum set up by the Nigerian Shipowners Association, lawyers, the Nigerian Chamber of Shipping and other stakeholders is geared towards building the required capacity to deal with outcomes of increased local shipping.  

    The purported stoppage of waiver and ban of foreign ships trading in Nigerian waters must be backed with a coherent plan that situates the actions on existing local capacity and structures so that there will be no disruption in the movement of oil and gas. It is against this background that the seized vessels that are not compliant with the Cabotage Act must be reviewed.

  • TNG Deal Breakers: NAICOM and merits of regulatory diplomacy

    TNG Deal Breakers: NAICOM and merits of regulatory diplomacy

    By Ifeanyi Ugwuadu

    The National Insurance Commission is the federal government’s regulatory agency for Nigeria’s insurance activities. One of its most important functions is to act as an adviser to the government on insurance matters. This function is advisory and persuasive in practice and does not in any way preclude the advised from seeking counsel from other sources. The regulatory diplomacy it embarked on more than 10 years ago when it started engagement with stakeholders to embrace its Market Development and Restructuring Initiative is good but has not yielded the desired results.

    The right equation should have been to start from the known to the unknown. Uncharted paths are usually tricky to tread. The known here is what works and can easily be tapped. 

    In order to understand the MDRI concept developed by NAICOM, it is important to note that the regulator is saddled with the function of developing the insurance industry with the one per cent levy accruing to it from the revenues of underwriters including levies and fees charged to other players and insurers. Within the constraints of a Nigerian governmental body and systemic hurdles, the regulator had struggled to perform its role and as we usually would say, “they’re trying their best.” The development initiatives focus on driving compliance with compulsory insurance legislated by the Nigerian State. There are numerous such that even the average Nigerian are unaware of their existence and benefit. 

    Yet the ultimate beneficiaries are the Nigerian people, mostly uninsured and hard-working day-to-day population who are daily exposed to accidents. These laws compel the haves to compensate those who have not through insurance.

    Justifying its development mandate, NAICOM claims it has, “collaborated with development partners to promote index-based agricultural insurance; licensed new insurance entities to increase the number of insurance operators and availability of insurance products in Nigeria; Facilitated financial inclusion by increasing the number of providers for the excluded and/or low-income segment and carried out learning sessions on micro-insurance and takaful.” In addition, it listed as part of its achievements the “Authorization of bancassurance to expand the distribution channels for insurance in collaboration with the CBN and commencement of “interface with some State Governments on compliance with compulsory insurances”. In all, the regulator specified 32 activities for the 5 goals it set for itself to be accomplished during the 4-year plan period ending in 2023. Great planning but it is still a work in progress and not an achievement as per verifiable outcomes.

    Compulsory Insurance

    Nonetheless, let us situate the compulsory insurance on the market development function of the Commission. The moribund Vision 2020 document fashioned by the Obasanjo administration identified 12 but factored only 6 for its revenue blueprint for the insurance market. The document forecasted a treasure chest of N6trillion by 2020 from the following lines of business;

      Motor insurance

      Cargo 

      Public buildings

      Buildings under construction

      Health insurance

      Group life insurance  

    Unknown to school administrators, school buses meant to convey children to school must have comprehensive motor cover in addition to a general accident cover purchased by the school on behalf of the pupils. The Inland Waterways legislation named the Cabotage Act also makes compulsory all inland transportation inclusive of crafts, tugs, boats, vessels, cargoes and passengers. These legislations are meant to deepen insurance penetration in the country which today is less than 1%. 

    Interestingly, all these laws fall within the implementation purview of various agencies of the federal government and in some instances, duplicated by States. The regulator is pursuing a deliberate policy to have the States adopt and domesticate these within their own laws but with little success.   A definite market development initiative which can anchor the partnerships NAICOM seeks to the constitutional deference to concurrence listing may be helpful. In such cases, NAICOM should clearly explain to the States how premiums accruing to it through compulsory insurance can impact on the State government functions. For instance, if a State enforces building insurance, how would the particular State’s fire service get the 1% under the existing revenue system? 

    Public Good Benefits of compulsory insurances

    Insurance protection is for the public good of society. The laws were enacted to shield individuals, groups and corporate entities from undue exposure to bodily and financial loss in the event that the usual vagaries of living happen. Thus, to formulate appropriate messages to the public, the campaign thrust by NAICOM and the industry players should focus on the public good and benefits of compulsory insurance legislation. These messages should tie in with the expected behavioural changes and buy-in that would aid voluntary compliance. For instance, any skilled worker on a construction site should be informed about the insurance protection that the law imposed on the builder and owner for the good of society. There are several fatal cases of building collapse where there was no reported insurance compensation for the injured or victims’ relations. 

    The public building and buildings (2-storey and above) under construction are two laws enacted under the Insurance Act 2003 to compel owners of completed buildings and the ones being constructed to own the liability arising from any accidental harm to people that move in and out of the buildings. While the regulator and the industry awareness programs focus more on uptake and premium arising from compliance, less attention is paid to beneficiaries and benefits. No doubt, premiums are needed and the critical mass has to be built up to accommodate those claims that may eventually come, but investments in awareness campaigns should be more embracing to educate those people of interest. An awareness thrust targeting groups and associations are cost-effective and result efficiently. 

    Partnerships and industry strategic goal

    Nearly 20 years since Insurance Act 2003 was enacted, the regulator and insurance companies had engaged with relevant government agencies to seek collaboration for the uptake of some key compulsory insurances but achieved little or no success. Many insurance companies do not have the resources to invest in long-term micro-insurance programs while partnerships with digital platforms is just beginning to take cognizance of the underserved segment of the population. 

    Certainly, compulsory insurance is only enforceable when the government that enacted the law shows interest in its compliance. The primary duty of the regulatory body should be to seek practical ways of enforcing compliance. Fortunately, a Minister of Communications and Digital Economy had been in place for about 4 years and this should have facilitated the design of a framework that would integrate with other APIs in both public and private sector domains to mine data and execute compliance. 

    Inter-regulatory partnership and inter-agency/State collaboration as being pursued by NAICOM are important and necessary but mass insurance should be micromanaged if large-scale success is to be achieved.  In this regard, the regulator’s messages has always targeted public partnerships leaving out private collaboration to insurers. It’s about time to drill down and get to the people who will be the beneficiaries. In addition, the insurance Commission can formulate a baseline strategy that cuts across individual companies’ business protectionism and helps companies to share intelligence on how best to engage the various publics on insurance.

    Cross legislative adoption

    The Federal Fire Services, responsible to the Minister of Interior, is the highest corporate beneficiary of public buildings insurance. All 36 States also have fire service departments. But since 2003 when the law was enacted, it has not adopted it as legislation and thereafter begin to issue fire safety guidelines to include compliance with occupiers’ liability insurance. For the insurance market, the compulsory insurances are business and if the premium content is slow and investments in market growth is capital intensive, it is considered not profitable to the balance sheet, at least in the short term. However, for the fire service, the legislation helps to equip it in the discharge of the duties of maintaining and promoting safety and firefighting capabilities for the public good. The Act of parliament which established it may be reviewed for additional functions and empower it to certify buildings with strong penalties. The same applies to compulsory insurance for buildings under construction. Federal and State building agencies charged with the role of approving and maintaining standards in the building market may adopt this in their codes and enforce compliance at the appropriate approval stage.

    Motor insurance remains the most popular and already the Federal Road Safety Commission has part legislation that compels it to enforce compliance with motor insurance. In addition, the revenue side of motor licensing at both Federal and State licensing offices demands motor insurance as a prerequisite for the issue and renewal of motor licenses. Integration, adoption and technology hold the key to successful enforcement.

    A collaborative effort by both PENCOM and NAICOM has not brought as much compliance to group life insurance, made compulsory under the pension Act, as it has for pensions. But this can change for good if the insurance regulator plugs properly the same subtle enforcement deployed by the pension regulator.

    Voluntary Compliance

    Most people resist any expense that does not have the immediate benefit and most insurance policies do not have such promises. Insurance promises a certain future that may or may not happen. The idea of having to pay a premium which has one-year validity after which you start to pay again is not exciting to many individuals. So, the winning strategy is to make insurance uptake convenient, accessible and solution-driven. The simple fact that all compulsory insurances are regulated and standard rates apply, it should be a spur for an industry team to tinker with product design, technology and delivery for the mass market. A consortium for the market may be set up. If the effort is accountable and well structured, it may attract seed capital from World Bank agencies for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

  • TNG Deal Breakers: NHIS to NHIA: Transiting from unknown quantity to yet unknown quantity

    TNG Deal Breakers: NHIS to NHIA: Transiting from unknown quantity to yet unknown quantity

    On both sides of the city streets stretching in long rows of well-lit structures, on a night drive with my host, were these neon-illumined signs of pharmacies. Pharmacies everywhere! It was the country’s capital city centre and I thought, this could be an indication that people here are always getting ill. Then it dawned on me while also on a tour of other towns and cities outside the capital that there were as many pharmacies as there were in the capital. So did my discovery weigh on me as to the health of the population here that I had to share my thoughts with my host and asked him the reason pharmacy shops dotted every nook and cranny of the country. 

    Oh! You thought this might be a business opportunity, isn’t it? My host asked, obviously guessing that since I was on a business trip and given the peculiar inquisitiveness of people from my part of Nigeria, I could be interested in exploring and testing grounds outside my major reason for the trip. 

    No! I replied, I was a bit worried by the sheer number of pharmacies and health facilities here. Then, he carefully explained to me that these facilities arose out of the countrywide implementation of healthcare insurance under the universal health policy of the government.

    This was Kigali and Rwanda some seven years ago. By that time Rwanda had attained over 95% coverage of its population. The sheer number of pharmacies and hospitals demonstrates the health infrastructural boost that can result from mass health insurance schemes.

    In contrast WHO estimates that Nigeria’s brain drain in the health sector has dipped the ratio to one doctor to every 10,000 persons (1:10,000), a critical emergency trigger when compared to WHO’s standard of one doctor to every 1000 (1:1000) of the population.

    The United States of America, the largest economy on earth provides for universal healthcare for its population and sustains the program. It is called Medicare. Everyone pays his fair share.

    But there is hope! “Given the role of health in reinforcing education and the measure of productivity, my leadership will pay serious attention to the health system by ensuring that at least 100 million poor Nigerians have access to free medical services through an integrated health insurance scheme.” This pronouncement was made by one of the leading presidential candidates in the 2023 general elections and the pledge resonates with an earlier promise by the present government when in May 2022 it signed the National Health Insurance Authority Act.

    The right to health is a fundamental provision imposed on the State by the 1999 Constitution. Worldwide, political and economic leaders are clear about the nexus between productive people and a healthy population. Therefore, investments in healthcare and education are clearly a direct input to a healthy, productive population. When the vast population of a nation are actively engaged for the most part in thinking about what to eat, the health suffers and then no time is left for creative thinking.

    New millennium, fresh start 

    Since the turn of the century and the beginning of the millennium, our country has struggled with the meaning of a productive people and the means towards achieving it. Hence its leaders had ventured into promising ‘Health for all by the Year 2000,” this being one of the ethe of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). There was no known functional strategy and structures towards attaining this global goal in Nigeria. It was all a singsong meant to achieve a rhythmic and pleasant effect on the ear, and perhaps, confuse the people. And so we sang until the year 2000 and a new era began with a horrible national health malaise.

    This subject is not the split milk but about the deliberate struggle to still spill more if the government ignores what matters. The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) Act was enacted in 1999, obviously to comply with the MDGs for ‘health for all” in universal health coverage, as if by promulgating the decree, all the health structures and personnel required to achieve it will fall in place. Trust the military at that time – it was decreed and not until about 2005 that a little impetus was seen towards the realization of its core objectives.

    The greatest flaw of the federal health insurance scheme is the full responsibility shouldered by the government for the payment of contributions to its workers. Thus the money that should have been paid to the fund for vulnerable groups in society served only the federal working population.

    Furthermore, federal allocation and appropriation to the scheme became the strongest content and shrouded the major objective of providing adequate healthcare for federal employees. Then when it could exercise patronage influence over private HMOs, the battle for money control dimmed the prospect of achieving any goal including paying proper attention to vulnerable groups’ schemes.  And so it became embroiled in controversy over its powers, accountabilities and actual beneficiaries of a well-run health system. Thus, NHIS achieved a total disconnect with the main objective of driving universal healthcare through insurance.

    Tax Deductible contributions

    The most important provision of the health insurance Act is that contributions shall form part of tax deductibles for both employer and employee. This means that in the computation of tax payable by the employer or employee, the amount contributed to the insurance scheme shall be deducted from the gross tax amount.

    Hence the National Health Insurance Authority Act (NHIA) repealed NHIS Act to establish a fully regulatory body. Therefore, NHIS ceases to exist until it registers and assumes a new status consistent with the new law and then wears a complete commercial toga. The Authority still retains the dual function of running the federal health insurance scheme.

    Mandatory Health insurance for all Nigerians and Residents

    The new National Health Insurance Authority Act makes basic health insurance mandatory for every Nigerian and resident. However, this does not preclude additional health insurance purchases by any individual or group. Employers shall register themselves and their employees to State Social Health Scheme Funds. The existing structure of health insurance is private-sector oriented and may present a serious transition challenge for existing HMOs under NHIS.

    According to the World Bank, the number of poor Nigerians will hit 95.1 million in 2022. This forecast is the primary basis for the estimate of poor and vulnerable persons to whom free healthcare access is targeted. Therefore, it is logical to forecast free access to healthcare for 100 million of the population who form the vulnerable group. The funding for this is provided in a Fund – the Vulnerable Group Fund. This group will receive free healthcare. 

    “Every State of the Federation and Federal Capital Territory may, for the purpose of providing access to health services to its residents establish and implement a State health insurance and contributory scheme to cover all residents of the State and FCT respectively. The basic minimum package for this coverage shall be in line with that provided in National Health Act.”

    Furthermore, the Authority shall establish a scheme to cover employees in the ministries, departments and agencies of the Federal Civil Service and other relevant groups. Again, the law has empowered the Authority to establish a scheme, apparently because of the legacy NHIS. 

    Sadly, this is the provision that will shape the amorphous nature of the new NHIA. NICON Insurance, Nigeria Re and other similar quasi-regulators have their stories when privatization arrived at their doorsteps. Unless this dual function is addressed now to make NHIA a strict regulator, it would be messy again.

    Under the present legislation, formal sector employers and employees must compulsorily pay the basic premium for coverage to the State scheme and then a supplementary policy may be purchased from private health insurance schemes to augment their coverage if required. The top-up is not mandatory.

    There will be no level playing field between States schemes, private schemes and federal schemes supervised by NHIA. The NHIA can exercise oversight on the federal scheme (a legacy of NHIS) but must not have a role in running it. 

    Governance Structure

    The accountability structures of NHIS were the bone of contention between it and the private sector actors. Accessing records of the actual payments made to hospitals for federal government employees’ health insurance was as difficult as the proverbial “camel passing through the eye of a needle.” Even most federal employees had no idea about the structure of health insurance that they were entitled and the scope of coverage for various levels of employees.

    Under the new Act, payment to the scheme is contributory for the formal sector, unlike NHIS where the federal government alone as well as the States where health insurance is being implemented, bears the cost. Everyone paying their fair share always works except for the vulnerable groups.

     The governing council is fairly representative but does not indicate how it can tap from the private sector models. The governance oversight by the board should be as strong as the objective of providing and pivoting easy access to health for the greater part of the population and superintending compliance with mandatory health insurance.

    The Authority is a national body regulating all health insurance schemes nationwide whereas a scheme for federal employees which it is to establish is restricted to federal institutions only. Although the law empowers NHIA to “promote, integrate and regulate all health insurance schemes that operate in Nigeria” and to “ensure that health insurance is mandatory for all Nigerians and legal residents,” the Act also concedes that States of their own accord can establish a scheme for its residents. Here lies the challenge of implementation.

    Most States do not have a structure for health insurance and compliance enforcement is dependent on collaboration between the States and the health Authority. Though Third Party Administrators will fill up the gap where a State does not yet have a State health insurance body, these administrators’ registration process,  establishment and takeoff may as well take as long as a State government to set up a State structure.  


  • TNG Deal Breakers: Fire, flood, fire, flood! Everywhere – Insurance?

    TNG Deal Breakers: Fire, flood, fire, flood! Everywhere – Insurance?

    One of Nigeria’s popular artists sang a prophetic line of “blood and tears” to drive home the kind of violence that will continue to be unleashed by those in power against hapless citizens. But this is not the direction of this topic. This is about tears and blood caused by incessant disasters and the absence of resilience models to cope with urban drift and population increases. However, when viewed against the concept of the social contract, citizenship rights and the values guaranteed by the constitution under which governments operate, there is a causative relationship traceable to the government in this instance. Sorrows, pains, blood and tears flow each time disaster occurs, whether man-made or natural. Greater also is the pain in the aftermath of a loss that has no mitigation and material recovery in place.

    Warnings over extreme weather conditions resulting from climate change have been ongoing for the past two decades. Incidentally, it does not appear that Nigeria is mapping the geography of her vulnerabilities and taking steps to tackle the increasing flooding of cities across Nigeria with its attendant destruction of lives, property and farmlands. Lagos is the only known city to put in place a Resilience Office to deal with the problems of flooding and other environmental problems.

    Floods Figures

    Statistics show that 363 lives were lost to flooding in 2012, Nigeria lost N2.6 trillion to flood disaster, 7 million people were reportedly displaced and about 597,476 houses were damaged.. A decade after, in the current year, official figures indicate that 2022 may yet record over 40% loss against that of 2012.  It was also reported that Nigeria’s worst flood disaster was 40 years earlier.

    Already death resulting from floods this year is said to be, at least, 600 people. Yet October and the rest of the year have not been fully accounted and the heavy rains forecast still lies ahead. About 1.4 million people had been displaced and 90,000 homes were either partially or completely destroyed by the floods, according to government officials.

    Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development, Nasir Sani-Gwarzo put the number of injured persons at nearly 1,550 while 44, 099 houses were declared, partially damaged, and 45,249 homes were totally damaged. In addition, 76,168 hectares of farmlands were partially destroyed, while 70, 566 hectares of farmlands were completely destroyed.”

    Fire Figures

    Fire service statistics show that over 50 market fires which occurred in 18 months across Nigeria, between 2020 and 2021, resulted in an economic loss of about N41.5billion in nearly two years. Lagos is the worst-hit city. About 80 deaths due to fire were reported between 2019 and 2021. These figures will increase astronomically if deaths from fuel tanker explosions, car accident fires and so on are included. And for the government, these are just numbers. Far more people die from these accidents than from communicable diseases and for many years now, the WHO now categorizes accidents as NCDs (Non-Communicable Diseases) and says that far more deaths are reported in accidents than from communicable diseases.

    Governments Responses

    The ecological Project Office (formerly Ecological Fund Office) reports to the Office of the Secretary to Government of the Federation, National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) under the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development. Ecology and Disaster get 1% of derivation and federal allocation while 20% thereof goes to NEMA.

    The federal government budget for disaster and ecology management in the current year is 2.32% of derivation funds of the revenue allocation formula. For the first half year, this amounted to N336billion. This amount covers a small fraction of the 2012 flood damage loss estimated at N2.6trillion. Sadly, the current year’s economic loss is projected to surpass that of 2012 by about 45%. These budgetary allocations are also distributed to States and local governments.  The States have their own budget which builds from the federal allocation.

    For instance, in Ekiti State in South West, an unsubstantiated cost running into billions of naira was said to have been spent to protect three local government areas at risk of flooding, which reportedly reduced the impact of the recent flooding. The Katsina State government announced N247,819,025 for disbursement to no fewer than 680 victims of the Katsina central market fire in 2021. Similarly, in 2016 Rivers State government gave N200million to victims of the Port Harcourt Timber market fire to help rebuild their shops gutted by fire. All these responses and budgetary provisions have no known risk or resilience model backing them.

    Why so many destructive floods, fire 

    Destructive flooding in Nigeria is traced to heavy rainfall and worsening climate changes. Deforestation, improper agricultural practices, poorly designed drainage channels and structures. Existing drainages also suffer from inadequate maintenance regularly blocked by debris from flood waters as well as the construction of buildings in flood plains.

    Earthquakes have not been reported in Nigeria, except for landslides from erosion and other ecological disasters. However, several fire outbreaks, particularly in markets, public buildings and homes are essentially due to negligence – either by the government or by individuals.  

    Statistical Analysis of Fire Outbreaks in Homes and Public Buildings published in the International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology (IJERAT) in 2018 by Adekunle Umanah, et al shows that “most fatal fires in homes often start in a bed, sofa, other loose fittings or clothing. The homes where fatal fires occur are rarely protected by smoke detectors.” The authors also identified arson as the “most common cause of fires in public buildings”. The majority of home fires and market fires have no insurance or any risk transfer mechanism.

    The authors’ study of Lagos State and their findings are consistent with established fire trends; 52% were not attended by the fire brigade and had no insurance payment, 18% attended by fire service but no insurance cover, 22% attended by the fire service with an insurance policy in place while 8% not attended by fire service but insurance was in place.

    The experts further noted that fire safety is largely dependent on individual and organizations behavioural patterns. The vulnerabilities to fire exposure, the fire properties of products, the technical fire safety in the building and the fire service’s capability to respond to a fire all form part of the bulwark of response effectiveness or vice versa.

    Sustainability Models

    The first internal inbuilt model should be an actuarial evaluation of the vulnerabilities and exposures of public assets. This foundation should be laid for any meaningful risk modelling design to take off. And this is not a priority of the government and its institutions.

    Catastrophe Bond or Special Peril Insurance

    Insurance instruments for large exposures have advanced since the 1990s such that government and insurance institutions partner to protect highly vulnerable assets through special peril insurance and or cat bonds. It is usually a good instrument for sovereign wealth, hedge funds, and other institutional investors. Catastrophe bond (cat bond) is a high-yield debt instrument issued by a State, City or reinsurance company. This is then purchased by high-net-worth capital market investors. On the strength of this, investors lend money to the issuer over the bond’s tenor at maturity or specified event trigger. Cat bonds are highly sophisticated risk-linked securities, built around models that establish any geography’s natural catastrophe exposures. The entrance of the African Trade Insurance Agency and the existing African Reinsurance Corporation and Continental Reinsurance Company should have ensured appropriate modelling of cat bonds related to Nigeria’s pattern of natural disasters like extreme flooding. 

    A portion of the budgets meant for national emergency and ecological disaster responses could be used to purchase special peril insurance by Federal and State Governments to reduce government exposures and improve accountabilities. At the same time, cat bonds may be issued and spread the risks caused by disasters such as extreme flooding and large-scale destruction. Obviously, this would require a political will and building it into our national risk protection and insurance philosophy. Notwithstanding, the government still requires to pull its weight during emergencies through budgetary provisions.

    Government & Traders Collabo 

    However, the causes of fire disasters are mostly man-made as established in studies. Therefore, insurance will certainly accept these risks while also government takes the part not covered particularly, market fires. Markets are public assets owned by States and local governments and let to individuals as lockup shops. So while the government takes insurance for the infrastructure, the individual insures content. But where individuals or groups decide to build and operate markets, then the responsibility for insurance falls on such owners.

    The model for market fire insurance would certainly differ owing to the identified ownership types. Governments should insist on traders purchasing insurance rather than committing taxpayers’ money to lift individuals who fail to take insurance. The more government dips its hands to dish out compensations, the more it encourages dependence on the government instead of promoting prudence in resource management.

    It smacks of imprudence when government fails to purchase insurance for public assets such as markets even when legislation makes it mandatory. It stretches to reckless spending to commit taxpayers’ money to substitute insurance claims.  The amount of money spent on the whims of States’ governors for political grandstanding is adequate to pay premiums for its assets. On this basis, it can make the acquisition of lockup shops and shades conditional on the purchase of relevant insurance.

    How insurance and fire services can engage

    Funding for fire service is also guaranteed under the public building insurance provision in the Insurance Act 2003. Insurance companies are required to remit to Fire Service 1% of the premium earned under this compulsory insurance. Enforcement for compliance by the parties involved has not commenced.

    Certainly, the fire service, the building agencies and insurance companies may consider a joint campaign to inform, and educate Nigerian residents for increased awareness to change behaviour. Experts also recommend training for school children as “an obligatory part of all schooling”. 

    For public buildings, education and training targeting occupants, employees and facility managers should embrace not only risks and safety measures but also insurance protection.