Tag: Democracy
-
Democracy died in 2015 when Buhari became president – Fayose
Former Governor Ayodele Fayose has accused President Muhamnadu Buhari of ‘strangulating’ the ideals and ethos of democratic governance in the country, declaring that democracy will only thrive when the APC-led federal government leaves office.
Fayose said that there was nothing to celebrate as gains of democracy under Buhari’s government, saying it was painful that “legacy of free, fair and transparent elections bequeathed to Nigeria by the PDP government has been destroyed, with elections in the country now being held at gun point.”
In a statement by his media aide Lere Olayinka on Friday in Ado-Ekiti, the former governor, who berated the APC-led federal government for its alleged open display of contempt for free, fair and transparent election, said peace and socio-economic development can only be achieved, when leaders earn legitimacy through the ballot,
He said; “Democracy will return to Nigeria again after President Buhari’s tenure. Today, there is no democracy to celebrate and I have not stopped wondering how we got here in Nigeria.
“I am sure Nigerians will still recall that I warned them in 2015. The people mourn when the wicked are in authority while they rejoice when the righteous are in leadership. Today, Nigerians are mourning.
“Nevertheless, we must all keep hope alive because after darkness, there will definitely be light,” he added.
-
No democracy in Nigeria under Buhari – Fayose
Former Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose has accused President Muhamnadu Buhari of ‘strangulating’ the ideals and ethos of democratic governance in the country, declaring that democracy will only thrive when the APC-led federal government leaves office.
Fayose said that there was nothing to celebrate as gains of democracy under Buhari’s government, saying it was painful that “legacy of free, fair and transparent elections bequeathed to Nigeria by the PDP government has been destroyed, with elections in the country now being held at gun point.”
In a statement by his media aide Lere Olayinka on Friday in Ado-Ekiti, the former governor, who criticized the APC-led federal government for its alleged open display of contempt for free, fair and transparent election, said peace and socio-economic development can only be achieved, when leaders earn legitimacy through the ballot,
He said; “Democracy will return to Nigeria again after President Buhari’s tenure. Today, there is no democracy to celebrate and I have not stopped wondering how we got here in Nigeria.
“I am sure Nigerians will still recall that I warned them in 2015. The people mourn when the wicked are in authority while they rejoice when the righteous are in leadership. Today, Nigerians are mourning.
“Nevertheless, we must all keep hope alive because after darkness, there will definitely be light,” he added.
-
Here are five sectors Buhari claims he’s done wonders + ONE PMB’s BIG REGRET
In a televised Democracy Day address, President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday listed his core achievements.
Here is a cursory look at some of the sectors where PMB claimed he has done wonders. However, Buhari said he regrets recent sporadic incidents with the tragic loss of lives in Katsina and Borno States as a result of criminals taking advantage of COVID-19 restrictions. Security Agencies will pursue the perpetrators and bring them to swift justice.
- ECONOMY:
On the economic front, our objectives have remained to stabilize the macroeconomy, achieve agricultural and food security, ensure energy sufficiency in power and petroleum products, develop infrastructure, fight corruption and improve governance.
We have witnessed eleven quarters of consecutive GDP growth since exiting recession. The GDP grew from 1.91% in 2018 to 2.27% in 2019 but declined to 1.87% in the first quarter of 2020 as a result of the decline in global economic activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Every single economy in the world has suffered a decline. Ours has been relatively moderate.
In order to stabilize the economy, the Monetary Authority took steps to build the external reserves which resulted in improved liquidity in the foreign exchange market.
The external reserves grew from $33.42 billion on April 29th 2020 to about $36.00 billion in May, 2020 which is enough to finance seven months of import commitments.
2. AGRICULTURE
Agriculture remains the key to our economic diversification strategy.
The Presidential Fertilizer Initiative programme continues to deliver significant quantities of affordable and high-quality fertilizers to our farmers.
This initiative has also revived 31 blending plants and created a significant number of direct and indirect jobs across the value chain.
Government is also revamping the cotton, textile and garment sector via a CBN Textile Revival Intervention Fund that would considerably reduce foreign exchange spent on cotton and other textile imports.
Through the food security initiative, we are promoting “Grow What We Eat” and “Eat What We Grow”. I am also delighted that more and more Nigerians are taking advantage of the opportunities in the agriculture and agri-business sector.
I assure you that government will continue to support the Agriculture sector through the CBN Anchor Borrowers Programme and similar schemes.
To protect our farming investments, we have deployed 5,000 Agro-Rangers and employed 30,289 in our para-military agencies. We are also integrating rural communities to the formal economy by extending access to credit and inputs to rural farmers and building feeder roads.
3. POWER SECTOR
The Power Sector remains very critical to meeting our industrial development aspirations and we are tackling the challenges that still exist in the delivery of power through different strategies.
We are executing some critical projects through the Transmission Rehabilitation and Expansion Programme including the:
a. Alaoji to Onitsha, Delta Power Station to Benin and Kaduna to Kano;
b. 330kv DC 62km line between Birnin Kebbi and Kamba;
c. Lagos/Ogun Transmission Infrastructure Project;
d. Abuja Transmission Ring Scheme; and
e. Northern Corridor Transmission Project.
Our agreement with Siemens will transmit and distribute a total of 11,000 Megawatts by 2023, to serve our electricity needs.
4. TRANSPORTATION
transportation, another critical sector to improving our economic competitiveness, we are growing the stock and quality of our road, rail, air and water transport infrastructure.
Through the SUKUK-Funded Road Projects, a total of 412km of the targeted 643km road projects have been completed, representing 64%.
The Presidential Infrastructure Development Fund projects are also progressing very well.
On the 2nd Niger Bridge, piling work has been completed and the approach roads are being constructed. 48% of work on this bridge has been achieved.
We have constructed 102km of the 376km Abuja – Kaduna – Kano Road, representing 38%, and the 42.9km Obajana – Kabba Road is 87.03% complete.
Furthermore, the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency has completed routine maintenance on over 4,000km of federal roads out of the 5,000km targeted.
We are extending and upgrading our railway network too. We are introducing more locomotives, coaches and wagons for the Abuja-Kaduna Rail Line.
The Central Ajaokuta – Itakpe – Warri Line has been completed and is being extended from Itakpe to Abuja on one end and from Warri Town to Warri Port on the other.
The Lagos-Ibadan Rail Line is 90% completed and would be extended to the Lagos Port which would help address the long-standing gridlock at the Apapa port.
The Kano–Maradi Single Track Standard Gauge Railway, Coastal Railway Project & Port Harcourt–Maiduguri Standard Gauge Railway,with its associated branch lines running through the South Eastern & Gombe States, industrial park & Bonny Deep Sea Port are all ready for concessioning.
Government continues to make investments in the Aviation sector to position it as a travel and trade hub in West Africa and the wider African continent.
Airport Terminals in Abuja, Lagos, Kano and Port Harcourt are being expanded, while the rehabilitation of the Enugu Airport is almost completed.
All our airports are being raised to international standards with the provision of necessary equipment, especially navigational aids, to guarantee world class safety standards.
5. Restoration of peace in Niger Delta. Maintenance of Oil production level
With the sustained engagement of youths, opinion leaders and other stakeholders, we have restored peace in the Niger Delta Region and maintained our oil production levels.
The Head office of the Niger Delta Development Commission will be commissioned shortly. The Funding of sections I–IV of the East-West Road shall be pursued with a view to completing the project by the end of 2021.
Furthermore, I am determined to ensure that development meant for the people of the Niger Delta get to them so I have authorised a Forensic Audit of the Niger Delta Development Commission.
-
Democracy, Politics and Virus, By Chidi Amuta
By Chidi Amuta
Faceless as it is, the Coronavirus may ultimately turn out a rather political virus. It has thrown up new challenges about the management of life (rate of infection) and death (reducing fatalities). Of all emergencies in recent human history, perhaps this virus has engaged the attention of politicians and world leaders more than anything else.
Its summons is instant and ever urgent. It has even re-written a few national budgets and re-arranged the stock markets of the world at a rate and in ways never before anticipated. On the average, the developed economies of the West are committing anywhere between 8-25% of GDP in emergency intervention to protect their populace from the worst economic hazards of the corona pandemic. Neither the onset of national elections nor even a full fledged war has electrified political leaders into such desperate frenzy as this virus. Hopefully, when it is all over, the coronavirus will have fundamentally redefined politics as the management of resources to meet the expectations of the greatest majority.
The virus may not have discriminated along racial, ethnic, ideological or even national boundaries, yet it is keeping politicians busy justifying their mandates and scoring instant results for their constituencies. Whether we like it or not, the Coronavirus is making a difference among the leaderships of the world. Gradually, it is beginning to emerge as a barometer of efficiency among leaders of nations.
Quite unexpectedly, democracy as the dominant political idiom of our age has come under a testy stress in different places in terms of how different systems have dealt with the corona virus. The critical question in this regard is: can democracy justify its preponderance when leaders are challenged to protect their peoples from an unseen and unexpected situation?
The virus took off in authoritarian China. It devastated a province with an estimated population of 60 million inhabitants, leaving an official casualty figure of 3,312 which is still open to controversy. Yet, that authoritarian state was able to summon its traditional dictatorial ethos to push back the virus with astounding results. It put up four mega hospitals in a few days, tested and treated a record number of cases while locking down and quarantining an area nearly the size of Nigeria. In a matter of weeks, the virus receded, literally chased away by the iron will of a people energised by a determined leadership.
Today, China is healing rapidly and is on the path to reasonable recovery from the virus. China’s rate of recovery from the virus, though still incomplete, remains almost miraculous in a world where the ravages of the pandemic are still unfolding with mounting fatalities. China has returned from 95% business closures to nearly that percentage of resumption. The people of Wuhan, the most affected area, have been summoned out of quarantine and back to life and work. China has learnt the lessons of lockdowns, emergency healthcare research and delivery and returned to work as the largest single producer and exporter of medical goods against the virus. A fortnight ago, Spain ordered $500 million worth of medical resources from China. From all over the world, orders for medical supplies estimated at over $25 billion are being processed and supplied.
No one has heard from North Korea. But the hermit kingdom would seem to have contained the spread of the coronavirus into its iron clad enclave or at least may have managed to contain information about the activities of the virus within its borders. Even the most exaggerated western speculations on the virus in North Korea put the fatality rate at less than 100 mostly among frontier soldiers and service personnel.
Russia, itself an illiberal democracy, has not fared badly either. Despite sharing a common long border with China, Russia has recorded a total of 3,548 cases and only 30 deaths. Its lockdown and social distancing and isolation regime remains one of the most aggressive and draconian in the world.
Meanwhile, the hallmarks of liberal democracy, the United States and Western Europe, have been devastated by Coronavirus. Italy has recorded 13,155 deaths; Spain has lost 9,387, USA has lost 5,112, France has 4,032; Great Britain 2,352 and Germany has lost 931 lives. As of the time of this writing, a plane load of medical equipment and supplies was on its way from Russia to the United States to support the government. The usually boisterous and ebullient Donald Trump has become a bit sobre and somber these days, humbled by an ordinary invisible virus!
But it is not a simple division between democracies and non democracies. It is not even a simple East-West line of demarcation. The younger Asian democracies have fared better than others in managing the virus and its outcomes. South Korea with a population of 51.5 million has had only 144 deaths; Taiwan with a population of 24 million has had only 4 deaths. Singapore, a city- state with a paternalistic political system and a population of 8 million has had only 2 deaths.
One explanation of the relative success of the East Asian young democracies over the older western democracies in managing the coronavirus emergency is the speed and relative efficiency of their bureaucracies. The less cumbersome a bureaucracy, the more speedy they tend to be in their responsiveness to the needs of the people.
However, it would seem that the real distinction among nations in terms of the results they have scored in managing the pandemic may be that between liberal democracies and the illiberal democracies. The distinction is between democracies that observe the full gamut of freedoms and liberties on the one hand and the ones who observe the ritual of elections but constrain the classical freedoms of democracy.
The illiberal democracies tend to reduce their primary obligation to the people to security defined in terms of physical security and security from disease, hunger, deprivation. They place basic freedoms beneath security so defined. In this regard, the illiberal democracies are better able to enforce social distancing, lockdowns and quarantines than the liberal citadels.
So far, not much attention has been paid to the relative low infection and fatality rates in sub Saharan African countries. Our numbers may be dodgy and unscientific. Our testing regimes may be unreliable and clinically deficient. We may not know exactly the rate of infection in Africa yet. But one thing you cannot hide from Africans is mass death and any disease that afflicts people in droves. In rural and crowded poor urban Africa, the coronavirus is yet to make devastating land fall. In a slom, social distancing is alien and foolish. May be it is the heat in our climate. Maybe it is something about the myth of the virus being afraid of hardy black genes except those of black people living like white people in air conditioned large houses. No one knows exactly. But so far, Nigeria with an estimated population of 200 million has less than 200 reported cases and a fatality of less than 3.
For us in Nigeria,however, the coronavirus has more important political meanings and messages. It has thrown up the question of leadership. It is in a time of national emergency that politicians are challenged to display the essential leadership for which they step forward to be elected. The jury is still out on the quality of leadership that the Nigerian federal government has so far provided since the coronavirus surfaced. In spite of the palpable early threats and increasing fatalities in China, Europe and the United states, the Nigerian government was slow in ordering a closure of the nation’s borders to flights and movements of persons from Europe, the United States and parts of Asia. Even when that decision was made, its implementation was haphazard and disorderly.
The psychological aspect of leadership in a national crisis did not seem to interest Abuja. President Buhari was quite reluctant to address the nation on the desperate public health emergency that was already ravaging the world. A cross section of the populace was unanimous in calling on the president to address the nation, to minimally show concern and empathy in the face of an unusual public health emergency. Nigerians needed a reassurance that something was being done to protect them from a clear and present life and death danger. It took that level of orchestration and over three weeks for the president to finally make a recorded broadcast.
Yet such reluctant leadership fell far short of global standards in such an emergency. Over and above a ceremonial national anthem broadcast event, leaders all over the world have mostly entered the trenches to reassure their peoples on a daily basis with facts and figures on what is being done to protect their lives and alleviate the economic hardships attendant on the pandemic. As we speak, Nigerians are still at a loss as to where and how to obtain basic testing for the virus and how to access medical care in the event of an infection. Ignorant state governors are ordering lockdowns without simole first aid kits in their public hospitals!
Nonetheless, the coronavirus has a political dividend for Nigerians in general and Mr. Buhari’s lack luster presidency in particular. Prior to the coronavirus, Mr. Buhari had settled into the unenviable legacy of being the most disastrous elected leader in Nigerian history. He seemed content with leading a divisive administration in which Nigerians were divided along all conceivable lines. A worrisome North-South divide had emerged and was being furiously orchestrated by both Buhari devotees and their equally strident southern antagonists. A clamour for re-structuring of the country into a truly functional federation has gained currency. Even more sinister, a Christian-Moslem divide had been further weaponized by the unrelenting assaults of Boko Haram and the opportunistic criminality of fundamentalists and political zealots.
The onset of the coronavirus has reunified the nation against a common unseen enemy. In a National Assembly that is largely averse to issues- driven debate, the virus has forged a bipartisanship hitherto unseen on any national issue. The legislature has been frightened into a solidarity with the executive on any measure that would protect the nation against this virus. There is no certainty that this solidarity will survive the end of the virus threat. The unseen enemy may vanish with these intangible political benefits.
It is not just at the national federal level that the coronavirus has made a leadership proposition in Nigeria. At the sub-sovereign level of state administration, one state government out of the 36 and the Federal Capital Territory has emerged as an example of outstanding leadership in a time of crisis. Building upon the pioneer role of Lagos in the fight against the Ebola virus in 2013-2014, the current administration of Lagos state has stepped up to the plate. It has provided timely information on the virus, set up identifiable testing centers and isolation facilities. It has created isolation wards in designated public hospitals with real time updated information on infections, admissions, discharges and contact tracing efforts while admitting its limitations. At a time when the nation’s borders are closed and airports are shut, Lagos has emerged as a decisive destination in the nation’s fight against the coronavirus by sheer dint of the quality of its political leadership.
Nigeria has joined the ranks of locked down republics. But the long term political and economic implications of the coronavirus emergency are brewing underneath the present silence of fear. Oil prices will rebound as the world economy recovers thereby assuaging the more dire economic predictions. But like most things in the Nigerian public place, the legacy of the coronavirus is likely to be political. The scramble for power in 2023 may just have found a single most memorable campaign subject.
-
Arthur Nwankwo: Giant in a country of political Lilliputians – Owei Lakemfa
By Owei Lakemfa.
I called Dr. Arthur Agwuncha Nwankwo a few months ago to discuss what those who fought for the enthronement of democracy can do to rescue the country in the aftermath of the 2019 elections and inauguration. As I began to explain the motives and why I want him to be one of the principal conveners to prise the country out of the hands of a hopeless political class, he interjected: “Owei, go ahead. I know whatever you are thinking and planning must be good for us. I am in. Put down my name” That was a patriot who had implicit confidence in people and ready to take risks.
In a political system where principles don’t matter, he lived by it. He believed that a politician with no clear ideology, is a danger to his community and people.
Nwankwo reminds me a lot about Mokwugo Okoye (MOK) who taught Nigerians that our independence was not just about building a neo-colony, but that there were nationalists like Raji Abdallah, Bello Ijumu and Osita Agwuna who like Kwame Nkruma in Ghana, Patrice Lumumba in Congo Democratic Republic, Felix Moumie in Cameroun, Sekou Toure in Guinea and Ahmed Ben-Bella in Algeria, fought for real independence.
My generation heard about MOK, but they were snippets; we truly had no idea what he wrote or what he and his fellow patriots of the Zikist Movement stood for. Then we heard that a Dr. Arthur Nwankwo of the Fourth Dimension Publishers in Enugu had published MOK’s seminal work: ‘Storms on the Niger’ and a race to get copies commenced. That book formed the foundations of our understanding of the independence struggle and why our country was in a sorry state.
In those days, there were healthy intellectual debates around literary genius, Professor Wole Soyinka and radicals on campuses who tended to compare his writings with those of Ngugi Wa’ Thiongo in terms of political and ideological contents. Then there were stories of a set of American-based neo-liberal scholars called the ‘Bolekaja Critics’ who were tackling Soyinka from Afrocentric planks. We hungered for their writings but had no idea how we could lay hands on them. Then rumours went round that Nwankwo had published the works of the Bolekaja troika of Chinwezu, Onwuchekwa Jemie and Ihechukwu Madubuike. Like magic, the book ‘Towards the Decolonization of African Literature’ published by Fourth Dimension, surfaced. That was in 1980 and Nigerians became aware that rare or unconventional books the established publishers would not touch, were being produced for mass circulation by Nwankwo.
It turned out that Nwankwo’s choice of the name ‘Fourth Dimension’ was a conscious reflection of his political beliefs. He explained in his 1995 book: “The African Possibility In Global Power Struggle” that: “It is both a reflective analytical mode of discourse, a philosophical elaboration of the specificities of the African condition and a pedagogical paradigm of African liberation” He explained that the Fourth Dimension’s: “ point of departure is history. Its methodological impetus is philosophy. Its constituent imperative is ideology, while pedagogy and political action in their relation to revolutionary irredentism defines its paraxial element.”
Nwankwo broke into national consciousness when his 117-page book: “Nigeria: The Challenge of Biafra” was published by Rex Collings, London in 1972. In it, he argued that: “Biafra presented an irresistible opportunity to establish a modern African state bereft of all the traditional ills that plague most African countries…Biafra was the first ship of state to sail in the sea of nationhood on a completely indigenous motor.” But Biafra, he said: “proved too weak for the ambitious responsibility it assumed. The collapse of Biafra was inevitable. Indeed Biafra lost the revolution before it lost the war.” He suggested that Nigeria could run on the Biafra development model of self-reliance, innovation and determination to find local solution to all problems.
Given his intellectual rigour, hard work, principles and unparalleled courage, it was not difficult to predict that he would soon be embroiled in a struggle with the Lilliputian political class. In 1982, he published an explosive book: “How Jim Nwobodo Rules Anambra State” in which he catalogued alleged cases of misrule, economic mismanagement and corruption against the governor.
Nwankwo was charged with Sedition before of an Onitsha High Court presided over by Justice F.O. Nwokedi, who sentenced him to jail for 12 months. However, the Appeal Court upturned the judgement ruling that the colonial law of Sedition contradicted Section 36 of the 1979 Constitution which gave Nigerians the freedom of speech and right to disseminate information, ideas and opinions. With that, the law of Sedition under which journalists had been hounded from colonial times, was in the case of Arthur Nwankwo v The State (1985)6NCLR 228, declared dead. It remains buried till this day.
Another famous case involving Nwankwo was his fierce public altercation with former Head of State, retired General Olusegun Obasanjo. The battles began with a controversial book: “Constitution for National Integration and Development” in which the latter advocated a one-party state for the country and Nwankwo’s review of the book. These were followed by a public correspondence war in which Obasanjo fired three letters at Nwankwo and the latter replied in same manner leading to the publication of Nwankwo’s 1989 book: “Before I Die”
In his critique of the book, Nwankwo had posited that: “Olusegun Obasanjo’s book is premised on the thesis that an inherently obnoxious man could be made good by a constitutional declaration of pious intentions” In his response, Obasanjo told Nwankwo to refrain from using: “extreme metaphors in our national discourse..”
The latter fired back that a coup plotter or its beneficiary cannot claim he did not impose his one party wish because of popular will: “For he did not come to power in the first place by ‘popular will” He advised Obasanjo to be : “tolerant of opposing views”
An enraged Obasanjo fired back on April 26, 1989 saying he finds it: “repugnant to extend time and materials in a non-productive past time such as ideological debates.” He accused the intelligentsia like Nwankwo of turning the country into: “ a nation of talkers and not doers, and we have subsequently become a nation of midgets, and as such we are midgets in our approach to our strongest political problem-instability” Nwakwo he said, suffers from: “jaundiced mentality and a deliberate engagement in a cross purpose dialogue”
On June 17, 1989, Nwankwo replied with his own missiles: “ It is not the responsibility of a social critic to rewrite an author’s book, but to reject it for its lack of systemic analysis…My ‘obsatinate’ rejection of any academic work which neither contributes to knowledge nor helps in any way in the transformation of existing realities, is the sole pillar of my profession as a publisher.”
Two days later, Obasanjo thundered: “ Your last response was down-right rude and amounted to personal insult on me and disrespect for my person and the office I have held…It will be interesting to see how you will use the tremendous intellectual, financial and media power you have somehow acquired to bring about the installation in power of ‘of those who know.”
On July 16, 1989, Nwankwo replied with what he said would be his final response. He posited that: “one-party extremists are one-party wolves” He said the Obasanjo regime: “ expressed open hatred for intellectual activity, stifled and strangled the universities financially and reintroduced school fees into primary schools (and) converted Lagos into Pretoria, Zaria into Soweto and Nigerianism into Apartheid.”
As the Babangida regime’s Transition to Civil Rule Programme meandered through landmines deliberately planted by the regime, Nwankwo subjected the process to rigorous analysis in his 1990 book: “Retreat of Power: The Military in Nigeria’s Third Republic” In it, he prophetically declared: “ The truth illustrates that the ongoing transfer-process cannot lead to a genuine democratization of society because by emphasizing the form of transition rather than its content, the regime is perpetuating the same negative thematics which engender armed intervention or military re-entry.”
Three years later, the regime annulled the June 12, 1993 Presidential elections won by Chief Moshood Kashimawo Abiola, and Nwankwo transformed into a leader of national street protests for the de-annulment. In order to be more programmatic and result-oriented, Nwankwo in 1993 established the Eastern Mandate Union (EMU)
In a bold attempt to resolve the June 12 crises and return the country to normalcy, Nwankwo on May 24, 1994, led the EMU to give the Abacha regime a five-week ultimatum to hand over power to a Government of National Unity to be headed by Chief Abiola. Two days later, a team of 30 soldiers, and security officers raided his home and he was detained without trial.
The pro-democracy protests were quite bloody, but they saw the backs of the Babangida regime and its Interim National Government contraption. Then came the Abacha regime, the most bestial and kleptocratic in the country’s history. In response to the challenges of that regime, the National Democratic Coalition(NADECO)was born. Its chairman, Chief Anthony Enahoro and a number of its founders soon scampered into exile following the state murder of people like Chief Alfred Rewane and Alhaja Kudirat Abiola.
With many of its leaders underground, in exile or dead, it became quite dangerous to be associated with NADECO; that was when Nwankwo accepted to be NADECO National Deputy Chairman with Senator Abraham Adesanya as National Chairman and exiled Chief Enahoro as international Chairman. Nwankwo took one of his most daring decisions in July 1997 by leaving the country to attend the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group Meeting on Nigeria in Edinburg, Scotland.
It seemed Nwankwo’s cup was full. In May 1998, a combination of seventy soldiers and armed security officers invaded his home seizing him and six other persons. They were detained at the Enugu Government House Special Detention Centre. They were moved to be dispersed to various detention facilities in the country, but inexplicably, returned. It was one week later they learnt that Abacha had passed away on June 8, 1998 and that General Abdulsalami Abubakar was already in his second week as Head of State.
With the transition to civil rule, Nwankwo and the EMU joined other NADECO groups like Afenifere to found the Alliance for Democracy (AD)with the EMU appointing Dr. Udenta.O. Udenta as National Secretary of the AD.
Nwankwo was ever ready to sacrifice for his comrades. When I launched my first book “Weaving Into History” on November 30, 1999 and invited him as the Special Guest of Honour, he flew into Lagos from his Enugu base, made an handsome donation and presented a speech: “ Labour in the Twilight of a Millenium – An Analytical Approach”
Eight years ago, I was in Enugu. I called him to say I wanted to come pay my respects. He insisted on coming to pick me in the hotel rather than my taking a taxi to his home. I was called in the room that he was around. As I made my way downstairs, I saw a crowd gathered at the reception entrance, I asked a staff what was going on, she replied that Dr. Arthur Nwankwo was on the premises. I did not know he still pulled crowds in the East. I walked up to him in the parking lot and excitedly, he swept me in his powerful arms and said: “Comrade, welcome, let’s go”
When he was attending the Obasanjo administration’s national political conference in 2005, he used to seek my opinion on matters coming up for discussion. That was Nwankwo; ever willing to learn from anybody no matter how young, and ever consulting.
On Saturday, February 1, 2020, this inimitable champion of the Nigerian and African people, this fearless and unconquerable general of political battle fields, this unmatchable intellectual gladiator, moved to the celestial fields, head unbowed with faith in the African people. As he would have wished, the struggle for a just world order and a better humanity, continues.
-
APC threatening Nigeria’s democracy – Atiku
…Seeks Committee to recent elections
Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has proposed to the national leadership of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to set up a committee to review recent elections in the country.
Abubakar gave the advice in a remark at the 87th emergency National Executive Council (NEC) of the PDP on Friday in Abuja.
He said that the party should not disregard the role of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and security agencies in the recent elections.
Abubakar noted that the PDP governed Nigeria well from 1999 to 2015, and as a true democratic party handed over power to the All Progressives Congress (APC), when it lost the general elections.The PDP candidate in the 2019 presidential election said the hope of the party was that the APC would continue with good governance but it had proved Nigerians wrong.
“It is has become necessary for us to mobilise Nigerians to resist the threat to our democracy, unity and development.
“Therefore, I will like to propose a strong committee to review the last elections and recommend to the party needed reforms to address the challenges in the last elections be set up forthwith.“But what cannot wait is that we should not take what has been happening in our democratic processes from the role of INEC, role security agencies and the judiciary for granted.
“If we take all these roles for granted that will be the end of our hard earned struggle and including our founding members, who are today not alive.
“What can we say we have done to their struggles as they lay in their graves?
“Therefore, as long as we are alive, it is our responsibility to reincarnate the struggle they led that brought about the democracy today that the APC government is threatening,’’ Abubakar said.
The National Chairman of PDP, Mr Uche Secondus, said the with Supreme Court judgment on Imo governorship election delivered on Tuesday, and what had been happening, the party must demonstrate to Nigerians that it is not happy.
Secondus said the party would stage a peaceful protest to demonstrate its grievances about recent elections and court judgments.
He said the leadership of the party must speak to Nigerians and participate in the civil protest to show Nigerians the state of their minds and leave the rest to God.
“It is with deep pain, sadness and concern for the fate of democracy in our nation that I welcome you leaders of our great party to this very important 87th NEC meeting.
“Anxiety has engulfed our country because it is now evident that all the huge sacrifice and contributions of our founding fathers to ensure the endurance of democracy in our land are being thrown to the dustbin.
“All the efforts of our great party to deepen and grow our democracy for 16 years that resulted in our losing power and handing over in a seamless transition to the opposition are being squandered.’’
Secondus said while the party condemned what happened in most states during the March 9, 2019 governorship elections, electoral violence became worst in Kogi and Bayelsa.
Secondus alleged that APC was planning to take over states that the PDP had won.
According to him, the PDP has it that APC want to arm twist the judiciary to get Sokoto, Benue, Bauchi and Adamawa.
Sen. Walid Jibrin, the Chairman, PDP Board of Trustee (BoT), noted that as the party was just recovering from injustice melted to it in the generally elections, another shock came with the judgment of Supreme Court on Imo state governorship election.
“This is our saddest moment, not only for the PDP but to the whole of Nigeria.’’
The meeting was attended by NEC members, including governors of Zamfara, Sokoto and Adamawa as well as Mr Emeka Ihedioha, who was recently removed as Governor of Imo by the Supreme Court.
-
Representative democracy and Nigerians lost battle – Godwin Etakibuebu
By Godwin Etakibuebu
It is for the purpose of checks and balances that developers of democracy, from origin, enshrined the three concepts or layers into government. Without the three layers; Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, conceptualised by the founding fathers, practice of democracy would have been so frustrating.
If the stages of designing policy into prosecution of same, to the point of interpretation were to be concentrated on one hand, the end result would have remained continuous creation of despotic and that would have enlarge the territorial infamy of anarchy.
The role-play of the three layers, which is to ensure checkmating one another, has actually redefined the beauty of democracy and makes it more attractive. Upholding the inherent benefits of this system however remains, as long as each of the three layers appreciates its autonomous identity. This is not say that all democratic system of governments over the ages have paid strict allegiance to practice of separation of power.
No, there have been different approaches from one clime to another. The difference however has more to do with individual political leaders’ greed in acquisition of absolutism in power.
Dictatorship occurs when one of the three, in most cases the Executive, plays the role of “first among equals” and thereby subduing the remaining two – Legislature and the Judiciary. Whenever the theory of separation of power is compromised, the major losers of the game in such environment are the people – the citizenry.
This is due to the fact that for the rights of citizens to be fully preserved as per the dictate of constitutional guarantee, there must be existence of the three organs; executive, legislative and judiciary – all subjective to constitutional authority. These three must only just be in existence, the vibrancy and resilience of the legislature and judiciary above the executive must be distinctly alive. Let us look at it this way.
A weaker Legislature will soon become an annex or appendix to the Executive while a docile Judiciary will always be too intimidated to give accurate constitutional interpretation the way it should be. This stands the fact out that at the place of melodrama of enslavement’s absurdity, the Executive arrive the pinnacle of absolute power without hindrance. And, it is an acceptable idiom that absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Nigeria, unfortunately, is at that stage already. We have in place a Judiciary that has been adequately cowed, thoroughly intimidated and resourcefully disgraced. The Judiciary long walk to opprobrium did not just start today. It came through a full process, with some judges [including a few justices of the Supreme Court]’s houses raided at midnight by members of the Directorate of State Security, without legal instrument, hoarded them [the judges] to “questioning chambers” [looking more of detentions places] before moving them to courts, on corruption charges.
This was followed up with the removal from office the Chief Justice of Nigeria without due process. In removing the CJN from office, the powers and functionality, constitutionally invested on both the Nigeria Judicial Council [NJC] and the Nigerian Senate, as regarding appointment and removal of the CJN, were ousted by the President [Executive].
Having concluded that phase without ado, the Executive turned to the Legislature for “decoration”. The broken, shattered and discarded legislative leadership of Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu, in 2015, was re-assembled from debris of ruins, and imposed same as leaders on the National Assembly, having secured all types of promissory notes of absolute [including blind] loyalty from them. At the Senate level, Senator Ahmad Lawan, would ensure “obedience into eternity”, while at the House of Representative, Honourable Femi Gbajabiamila “promised leading without raising objection forever”.The first person to declare the totality of loyalty without objection to the Executive is the Senate President. He made the “commitment” when Professor Itsy Sagay [SAN] paid him visit in his office at the National Assembly. Prof Sagay had requested the Senate President to ensure confirmation of the EFCC Chairmanship position. Listen to Senator Lawan’s response.
”This is a new Senate. Going by our rules and I believe that goes for the House of Reps too, any issue that was not concluded in the last National Assembly, will have to start all over again. So, as far as we are concerned, those bills will have to come again and start to go through the process from the very beginning. We are ready. In fact, we are in haste if those bills are ready for us to start working on them.”
Senator Lawan told his guest there was no request before the Senate for the confirmation of the acting chairman of the EFCC, before dropping the bombshell.
“I want to assure you that any request that comes from Mr. President is a request that will make Nigeria a better place in terms of appointments or legislation. When such request comes, the Senate will act expeditiously to ensure that we play our part in the confirmation or passing of legislation appropriately.”
Did you hear that? Any [and every] request that comes from Mr President is a request that will make Nigeria a better place in terms of appointments or legislation.
Let us listen to what Femi Gbajabiamila said on this same issue, though at different fora. He was talking to his constituent at Surulere in Lagos over the weekend when some members of the constituency wanted him to clarify the now popular held-opinion that the National Assembly is now a rubberstamp.
“People, naysayers, critics, and people from other parties have said the 9th National Assembly is a rubber stamp to the executive. “You know my reply when they say that to you? Tell them that you would rather have a rubber-stamp National Assembly that will bring progress than the one that is fighting the executive without progress. “This is because when two elephants fight, the grass suffers. This is not a rubber stamp National Assembly; this is a National Assembly that represents the people and is committed to their interests. “The people of Surulere Federal Constituency 1 did not elect me to go and be fighting the executive; Is that what you asked me to go and do?”
It is really time for Nigerians to cry big because they have lost out, big also, in this venture where their own elected representative have vowed to turn their [the elected] backs on them [the electors]. For now, the Executive can do whatever it likes, against the electorate because the electorate has no representative to defend their political interests.
This translates to a situation where the Nigerian electorate will have no say on affairs of this country, at least for the next four years. There is nothing we can do, not even the harsh reality of mis-governance which has crowned our dearly beloved country poverty capital of the world, making all of us shareholders in Poverty Plc.
We elected them to represent us and bring us dividends of democracy. They rejected us, denied us any benefit, but got for themselves instead, a befitting reward of Thirty Seven Billion Naira to renovate their Kingdom Headquarters.
That’s just the way the Nigerian political leadership cookie crumbles!Godwin Etakibuebu; a veteran Journalist, wrote from Lagos.
Contact:
Twitter: @godwin_buebu
Facebook: Godwin Etakibuebu
Facebook Page: Veteran Column
Phone: +234-906-887-0014 – short messages only.
You can also listen to this author [Godwin Etakibuebu] every Monday; 9:30 – 11am on Lagos Talk 91.3 FM live, in a weekly review of topical issues, presented by The News Guru [TNG]. -
Saraki saved Nigeria’s democracy from collapsing , says PDP chairman
The National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Prince Uche Secondus, on Thursday declared that Bukola Saraki, immediate past Senate President defended democracy and national unity during his time as leader of the senate.
Secondus while felicitating with Saraki on his 57th birthday said the former Senate President protected Nigeria from collapsing.
In a statement he personally signed, Secondus declared that the PDP was very happy with the outstanding roles of Saraki towards ensuring democratic stability in Nigeria.
According to the PDP National Chairman: “On behalf of the National Executive Committee, celebrates former President of the Senate, Senator Olubukola Saraki, as he marks his 57th birthday.
“The PDP is exceedingly proud of Senator Saraki for his innumerable sacrifices towards the unity, stability and development of our nation, as well as his outstanding roles in the struggle for the restoration of democratic tenets in our country.
“Senator Saraki remains an exceptional patriot whose track record of performance as a medical doctor, state governor, President of the Senate and Chairman of the National Assembly and later Director General of PDP 2019 Presidential Campaign Organization, stand him out as one of the contemporary leading lights of our nation.
“Senator Saraki’s tenure as the governor of Kwara state was marked by resounding legacies that repositioned the state for greater productively in critical sectors, for which he remains one of the best governors Kwara state ever produced
“As the Chairman of the National Assembly, Senator Saraki courageously asserted the independence of the legislative arm in defending the interest and wellbeing of Nigerians as well as protecting our democracy and national cohesion from collapse during our nation’s most trying moments in recent history.”
Secondus insisted that PDP was also proud of the resilience, skill and proficiency with which Senator Saraki led the most popular Presidential campaign which, in an unprecedented manner, galvanized Nigerians in their collective quest, under our Presidential Candidate, Atiku Abubakar, to rescue our dear nation from misrule.
“Our party therefore salutes this icon of democracy, a detribalized Nigerian and quintessential leader as he attain 57 years of age and prays God to bless him with more years in good health to continue in his selfless service to our dear nation,” he added.
-
Dearth and death of character – Hope O’Rukevbe Eghagha
By Hope O’Rukevbe Eghagha
Character or the primacy of character, as we knew and know it, is dead. And it is on the way to the cemetery for a final burial. Instructively, this fatal fate of character traverses geographical, religious and cultural boundaries.
The high ideals which people of the generation before mine and which we grew up to embrace and celebrate have now become anachronisms in the so-called brave new world.
How else do we account for the rise of the Donald Trumps and Boris Johnsons and their likes as icons of popular democracy in the western world?
How do we account for the high number of judicial officers soiling their hands on the temple of justice? How do we account for a Chief Justice standing aside while his predecessor is hounded out of office and he is appointed to head the judiciary? Where is self-respect when a Chief Judge cannot tell the King that he is wrong?
Where is character when a VC cannot stand up to power as Professor Ade Ajayi did to the military in 1978? Some four hundred years later, the declaration of Shakespeare’s witches in Macbeth ‘Fair is foul and foul is fair’ has come to dominate the world.
Character refers to the ‘mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual’. There are strong characters just as there are weak characters. Also, there are persons who can be said to be unstable in character. When we talk about good character, we refer to persons who have one or several of such virtues as integrity, honesty, loyalty, fortitude, courage, and other important virtues that promote good behaviour. It is true that in all societies there had always been persons who tried to subvert the law, who tried to create their own world by operating outside the accepted norms. But Chinua Achebe’s proverb ‘the man had taken enough for the owner to notice’, always caught up with people in the form of nemesis.
Good character is predicated on one factor: that we know what is right and what is wrong. Swami Sivananda says that “If you do not know the laws of right conduct, you cannot form your character”. We are not dealing here with the pristine or the natural instincts which are inherent in man. At the first level, we speak of values and thoughts and ideas which have been imparted to us from when we became conscious of our environment. Parental, societal, religious and educational settings help to inscribe these in our hearts.
Also, there are certain forms of right and wrong that are instinctual. The Apostle Paul says in the book of Romans two verse fourteen that actions of people not exposed to the rudiments of Christianity ‘show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another’.
It would seem that the death of character has no mourners. There are no regrets, that is. Those who understood/understand character are no more, at least not in the public space. The rules of social engagement have been and are continually being rewritten. Let me assert that in our private lives, we still meet people of character, both men and women. Somehow, these do not get into the public sphere to exercise their virtues in support for and in defence of the common good. John Locke says that ‘the discipline of desire is the background of character’. In this quotation, Locke elevates character to the highest requirement for character development- self-discipline. The capacity to say yes or no based, on sound ethical principles is part of character.
We grew up respecting certain persons on account of what they stood for through their actions and words. Some were local persons while others thrived on the national stage. So, I’m going to mention some local and national characters I can remember. Some may not ring a bell; yet in their areas of influence we could see principles. Tai Solarin. Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti. Obafemi Awolowo. Justice J.I.C Conrad-Taylor. Gani Fawehinmi. Ebenezer Otomewo, one-time GKS President.
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. Pa Imoudu. Justice Kayode Eso. Justice Yahaya Jinadu. Justice Emmanuel Araka. Murtala Mohammed. JP. Clark. Wole Soyinka. Chinua Achebe. J.F. Ade-Ajayi. I.O. Izeogu, my secondary school principal. These and many more were men and women who stood for something and were ready to defy all the odds. “Character” writes J.C. Watts “is doing the right thing when nobody’s looking. There are too many people who think that the only thing that’s right is to get by, and the only thing that’s wrong is to get caught.” To get by! People just get by. The cost of standing on principles is very high these days.
But the real question is whether people of character can thrive in a society that does not encourage good character. It is true that good character is a constant because according to Heraclitus, ‘good character is not formed in a week or a month. It is created little by little, day by day. Protracted and patient effort is needed to develop good character’. What this means is that in spite of the environment and all other factors, good character must remain constant like ‘Lot in the city of Sodom’. The dominant narrative across the world now is that it is okay to be ‘characterless’ as long as one is not found out. This then is the real dilemma. There are too many people in the public arena who display the power of being unprincipled. And they seem to thrive. It is a sad situation.
What is the way out? I am afraid that there is no way in the near future. Short of an ethical revolution, I do not see any glimmer in the horizon. We are in a freefall that could only end when we hit the bottom. An implosion that splits the world into bits may be the answer. Not very comforting. Time will tell!
Eghagha can be reached on 08023220393 and heghagha@yahoo.com