Tag: dss

  • Danger of the Single Story (DSS) – By Azu Ishiekwene

    Danger of the Single Story (DSS) – By Azu Ishiekwene

    There’s a part of my job that can swallow you whole. Journalists are brought up on a diet whose main ingredients are a deliberate blend of crime, sex, and money. Everything else is a side dish. That’s why if you follow what you read daily in the newspapers, on the radio or TV or any of the online extensions of the media, you sometimes think the world is going to hell in a handcart.

    From the shocking reports of killings in Benue and Plateau States to stories of kidnapping for ransom, banditry, and other minor forms of criminality, there seems to be no relief from bad news. And from the war in Ukraine to the devastation in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, the news is no less depressing. 

    Bad news is good news?

    Either out of habit or an oversupply of bad news by politicians and their cousins in business, news reports by journalists have never been more toxic, more hopeless. 

    Chaos in Nigeria’s main opposition party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). Labour Party (LP) in disarray. Factions in the Social Democratic Party (SDP) are at daggers drawn. A daylight coup topples the chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Plans to form a coalition party heading for a brick wall. 

    When you think there’s light in the tunnel of bad news, you find that it’s the light of an oncoming cargo train loaded with more crime, more sex, more money, more chaos.

    The other side

    Switching off or stepping outside our comfort zone now and then can be beneficial therapy. I’ve been in three states recently that are mainly in the news for the wrong reasons. Delta, Enugu and Zamfara have been in the news for bitter, rancorous politics, banditry, and criminality. From the outside looking in through the news lens, you will be forgiven for thinking these states are done for. Yet, my visit to each of them was a pleasant surprise, a teachable moment in the perils of the single story.

    Though each state has its priorities, they, like all other states, are grappling with the challenge of making government work for citizens by creating opportunities, reducing poverty, and being more accountable. 

    There’s still a long way to go, but what I saw during my limited time in these three states, summarised by my journey to the North West state of Zamfara (pop. 6.5m) – the most frightening of them all – suggests that there might be hope.

    Going to Gusau

    The first time I received the invitation to visit the state capital, Gusau, I deflected. I needed to think through it, especially in light of a torrent of bad news about Ado Aliero and his violent band of terrorists in the region. 

    Then the invitation was renewed. There was some comfort in the group that I was to travel with for the first live media chat with Governor Dauda Lawal on his half-term – Gbenga Aruleba (AIT), Reuben Abati (ARISE TV), formidably backed up by his wife, Kiki, Ahmed Shekarau (Media TRUST), Onuoha Ukeh (SUN), and Babajide Otitoju, later replaced by Olajumoke Olatunji (TVC). You couldn’t wish for a more solid panel. 

    ChatGPT and Gusau

    But there was a problem. How do we get to Gusau, knowing what we know, I asked ChatGPT. Response: Don’t go except it’s essential. 

    It flagged travel advisories by the UK Foreign Office, Australia, Canada, and the US with dire warnings against travelling because of violence, banditry and kidnapping, saying, “The overwhelming consensus from travel authorities is not to recommend travelling to Zamfara State, unless absolutely required.”

    The Zaria-Zamfara highway, especially the Funtua (in Katsina), Tsafe, Maru-Dansadau stretch, was described as deadly, the playground of Dogo Gide and Bello Turji, whose gang killed at least 20 travellers, according to an AP report in April this year. I was on my own, but determined to travel.

    Death and resurrection

    I died and rose many times during the two-hour fifteen-minute trip, consumed by fear and sustained by a lingering sense of adventure that dying at 60 is not dying too young. Unknown to me, my wife had sneaked a rosary into my bag, with a small bottle of anointing oil. 

    Since I didn’t notice until I cleaned my bag after returning from the trip, she can claim some credit for the protection charm. I was alert the whole of the 450 km road trip from Abuja, wracked by anxiety. It might have been better if she had also provided a sleeping talisman. 

    To my surprise, the highway between Zaria and Katsina was double-lane and well paved, narrowing as we entered Katsina, and opening up again in long stretches of vast plain fields with enchanting rocks and low hills on both sides. The Abuja-Kaduna highway is a disgrace compared to this one, and yet, the Abuja-Kaduna highway, a shambles, to put it mildly, is the main gateway to the North West.

    Valley of the shadow…

    After Zaria, occasionally, we passed towns, the busiest and perhaps most prominent of which was Funtua, the home of some of Nigeria’s most influential politicians, including the late Malam Ismail Funtua, and the businessman, Umaru Mutallab. 

    All was quiet, and I couldn’t help but ask myself if folks in the settlements with clay-walled fences and houses in the small towns we passed through knew what was said of them in the media. As we entered Tsafe, the hometown of one of the most notorious bandits, who got a red carpet reception in Katsina before our visit, every hair on my skin was on edge. 

    Even though police escorts accompanied us and there were several military checkpoints along the way, as we entered Tsafe, 48km to Gusau, you could slice the fear inside our bus. There was not a murmur.

    After Tsafe, I thought the worst was over, at least for the first part of this journey. I felt both relieved and confused as we entered Gusau. Relieved that we had arrived safely, and confused because the paved, nearly finished double-lane road leading into the capital conflicted with my perception of Zamfara as a lost cause. The streets were clean, with a sense of renewal.

    Making change happen

    I would later see similar scenes in Enugu, where I had not been since 2006 (when Chimaroke Nnamani was governor). My previous visit to Zamfara was in the early 1990s, when it was still a part of Sokoto State. After one military administrator and four civilian governors, before Dauda, the fifth, Zamfara has been something like Kowa, the fictional state in Kannywood’s political thriller “War”, where politicians treat state resources, including its people, as pawns in a game of power.

    Dauda may yet make the difference. In two years, he has upgraded the consulting clinic in Gusau to a teaching hospital with some of the most modern facilities, significantly improved access to drinking water, and cleared the backlog of students’ WAEC and NECO fees, which left the state at the bottom of the results table for years. It’s also building a new airport that may be open before September.

    The government said it has cleared arrears of gratuities and pensions for local and state government officials owed since 2011, estimated at N13.6 billion, apart from settling a four-month salary arrears it inherited and raising the minimum wage from N7,000 monthly to N70,000.

    “Nightlife”

    When the live interview panel anchored by Abati asked Dauda how he got the state on a promising footing, including giving it its first traffic light since it was created 29 years ago, the governor said it was mainly by blocking leakages using technology, and prioritising human resource development and capacity building. He said technology has also been deployed to gather and use intelligence to make the state safer, vowing that there would be no negotiations with bandits and criminals. 

    “Nightlife is back,” Dauda said. I could not find out before returning to Abuja by road in another uneventful journey two days later.

    If nightlife is back in Gusau and day-lifers outside Gusau in this mainly agrarian state can gradually return to their farms, that is another lens through which one may view a state defined for nearly three decades by religious extremism, graft and banditry.

    Ishiekwene is the Editor-in-Chief of LEADERSHIP and author of the book Writing for Media and Monetising It.

  • NANS president, Isah released after nearly two months in detention

    NANS president, Isah released after nearly two months in detention

    After nearly two months in custody, the Department of State Services (DSS) released the embattled factional president of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Atiku Abubakar Isah, on Thursday, following growing public outcry and legal pressure.

    According to reports, Isah was reportedly handed over to his family and legal team after weeks of delayed bail compliance despite fulfilling all conditions set by the court.

    Earlier in the day, a report had surfaced that the DSS had refused to release Isah, despite the completion of additional paperwork requested on Wednesday.

    Shortly after the report went public, DSS operatives contacted Isah’s family and lawyer, instructing them to come to the Abuja facility to collect him.

    Isah had been arraigned on Tuesday before a Magistrate Court in Abuja, where he appeared wearing black attire, reportedly still recovering from injuries allegedly inflicted by a rival NANS faction.

    He was granted bail in the sum of ₦5 million, with one surety in like sum.

    His lawyer, Marshal Abubakar of Falana & Falana Chambers, disclosed that the DSS charged his client with “inciting public disturbance and impersonating a public officer.”

    “They accused him of inciting students to breach the peace and disrupting a meeting held by a rival NANS faction. They also claim he falsely presented himself as NANS President,” Abubakar said.

    The controversy surrounding Isah’s detention has drawn significant attention, particularly after he accused Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Tinubu, of offering him a ₦100 million bribe to step down from his role.

    Isah alleged that after he rejected an offer, he was abducted, stripped naked, and assaulted in the presence of the Managing Director of the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA).

    He claims that the attack was orchestrated by a rival faction of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), led by Olusola Ladoja, who is allegedly backed by Seyi Tinubu.

    On May 14, 2025, Isah filed a ₦38.3 billion lawsuit for the enforcement of his fundamental rights at the Federal High Court in Abuja. He is suing the Department of State Services (DSS), the NTA, and Seyi Tinubu for kidnapping, unlawful detention, physical assault, and defamation.

  • “Shadow govt”: Pat Utomi asks court to dismiss DSS suit

    “Shadow govt”: Pat Utomi asks court to dismiss DSS suit

    Prof. Pat Utomi, has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss the suit filed by the Department of State Services (DSS) over his alleged plan to establish what he called, “a shadow government” in the country.

    Utomi, a Professor of Political Economy and Management Expert, made the application as the court begins hearing of the suit on Wednesday.

    He told Justice James Omotosho in a preliminary objection filed by his lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction.

    In the preliminary objection dated and filed June 24, Utomi, the 2007 Presidential Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), raised four grounds why the suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/937/2025, should be dismissed in its entirety.

    He argued that the DSS’s suit disclosed no reasonable cause of action within the contemplation of the enabling statute of the security outfit — the National Security Agencies Act, Cap N74, Laws of the Federatio Nigeria, 2004.

    He submitted that the “subject matter of the suit, being civic political engagement, shadow cabinet formation, and public policy discourse, does not fall within the statutory functions of the State Security Service as provided under Section 2(3) of the National Security Agencies Act.

    “The reliefs sought by the plaintiff/respondent seek to criminalise constitutionally protected rights to freedom of expression, association, and political participation contrary to Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    “The suit amounts to an abuse of court process, is speculative, incompetent, inchoate and lacks any legal foundation.”

    Utomi, therefore, urged the court to strike out or dismiss the suit on the aforesaid grounds and for want of jurisdiction.

    In the affidavit in support of the notice of preliminary objection deposed to by Utomi himself, he described himself as “a Nigerian University professor, entrepreneur, author, and politician, born on the 6th of February, 1956.”

    He said he had served in several high-profile capacities in both the private and public sectors, including as Deputy Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Volkswagen of Nigeria in the 1980s, and as Adviser to the President of Nigeria in 1983.

    He said he had caused a preliminary objection to be filed, challenging the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit.

    He said that the suit is speculative, hypothetical and premature, as it seeks preemptive orders on mere suspicion and without factual basis.

    He averred that the DSS lacked the requisite locus standi to institute the action in the manner it had done.

    According to him, the subject matter of the suit falls outside the constitutional and statutory powers of the claimant, and does not invoke the civil jurisdiction of this honourable court;

    “That the suit amounts to an abuse of judicial process intended to muzzle the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression and political association.

    “That the claimant has not disclosed in the originating summons any concrete act or omission on the part of the defendant amounting to a breach of any known law or posing any clear and present danger to national security.

    “That the suit as presently constituted is an attempt to use civil proceedings to achieve objectives which, if any, ought to be pursued under established statutory processes with clear legal thresholds and procedural safeguards.

    “That the claimant has failed to demonstrate any justiciable grievance entitling it to the discretionary reliefs of this honourable court.

    “That it is in the interest of justice to have this honourable court determine the preliminary objection before any further steps are taken in the substantive matter.

    “That this honourable court will best promote the ends of justice and prevent an abuse of its process by striking out or dismissing this suit for want of jurisdiction,” he said

    DSS had sued Prof. Utomi, the sole defendant, over his planned, “shadow government.”

    The DSS, in the suit filed by Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, prayed the court to declare the move as an attack on the constitution.

    The service contended that the move by Utomi was intended to create chaos and destabilise the country.

    The agency also filed a motion praying the court to stop Utomi and his agents from staging any rally or demonstration in relation to the subject matter, which is currently pending before the court.

  • IPOB: 200 security personnel killed in South East – DSS witness

    IPOB: 200 security personnel killed in South East – DSS witness

    A Department of Statement Services (DSS) witness on Wednesday, told the Federal High Court in Abuja that between 170 and 200 security agents have died due to the activities of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) in the South Eastern Nigeria.

    The witness, simply identifed as DDD for security reasons, disclosed this before Justice James Omotosho in continuation of his testimony in the ongoing terrorism trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the IPOB.

    DDD was led in evidence by the Federal Government’s lawyer, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN. DDD, who is the 4th prosecution witness (PW-4), said the activities of IPOB and its armed wing, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), had led to the death of many security personnel in the region.

    He restated that the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) did not issue license to Kanu to import the radio transmitter he allegedly smuggled into the country to operate Radio Biafra.

    He said shortly after he and members of his team recovered the transmitter from a premises in Ubuluisiuzor, Anambra, and brought it to Abuja, the DSS wrote the NBC to inspect it.

    The witness told the court that on Nov. 9, 2015, the NBC sent an engineer, who inspected the transmitter and wrote a report.

    Awomolo then tendered a certified true copy of the provisional assessment of radio transmitter report submitted by the NBC.

    DDD was asked to read a portion of the report, which he did. He said the report indicated that the transmitter was a German made and that it was indeed a radio transmitter made for use on FM frequency.

    The witness said the report also stated that such transmitter could only be procured and installed after being issued a licence and that the NBC had not licensed Radio Biafra to broadcast in Nigeria.

    The PW-4 added that investigation by his team revealed that for one to operate a radio station in the country, one must apply to a regulator, who would issue a licence after due clearance by relevant security agencies.

    “In this case, there was no application from the defendant. He brought in the transmitter illegally without approval,” he said.

    He also said investigation was confirmed that the defendant was the owner of the transmitter, which he kept in the premises of one Benjamin Madubugu.

    The witness said Kanu later came into the country and inspected the transmitter and made a video to satisfy members of the IPOB, who contributed money for the purchase of the transmitter.

    He also read from some publications of the Vanguard newspaper, where it was reported that an arrested commander of ESN confessed to the activities of his group.

    The witness said the ESN member, who he identified as Uzuoma Benjamin, aka Onye Army, spoke about how he was recruited and how they allegedly received directives from the defendant.

    He allege that the defendant directed them to kill security agents and ensure that a deceased member of the group, Ikonso, was buried with 2000 human heads.

    The witness also read where the said Onye Army claimed that he and other members of his group used the heads of 10 girls to prepare charms for their protection.

    He said investigation revealed that the invasion of Owerri prison by IPOB members was directed by Kanu in one of his broadcast for his followers to attack and kill security operatives of the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    DDD said further investigation revealed that the defendant, in his broadcast directed that Ikonso should be buried with 2000 heads, but that only 30 were gotten.

    He said when the DSS requested from the police to access Onye Army, the police claimed he had escaped from custody.

    He said during one of DSS’ agents’ raid of ESN members’ hideout, “we saw some ESN members, about seven, with human heads and some eating human flesh, which they said was for spiritual fortification.

    “We could not find Onye Army. The police said he had escaped from custody.”

    He said there were records about the number of security agents allegedly killed in the South East and that the number stood between 170 and 200.

    The witness who said two DSS officials, including his driver, were among the victims, said it cut across all security agencies.

    On how the ESN members operate, the witness said they are combatants, who carry arms and attacked homes of prominent individuals and traditional rulers in the region.

    He said because they lacked sufficient operational tools, they sometimes set up roadblocks during which they hijack vehicles for their operation.

    The witness identified some public property which he said IPOB and ESN members attacked and destroyed in the South East, including police stations.

    He also gave details of how the late Ahmed Gulak, the former aide to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, was killed on May 30, 2021 in Owerri, Imo.

    On how Gulak died, the witness said he was among the first responders to the scene where the late chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was killed and his corpse recovered.

    He said on May 30, 2021, there was a total breakdown of law and order, as a result of the stay-at-home order declared by the defendant, through one of his broadcasts.

    The witness said later that day, one of his officers informed him that a prominent politician was killed around Obiagwu and that when they got to the spot, they saw what happened.

    He said the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) in the area told him that Gulak was in a hired cab when he was killed by IPOB some members.

    The PW-4 said the driver told him that they were heading to the airport from Owerri town, when they saw a check point mounted by men of the Nigerian Air Force who were preventing people from accessing the airport, but decided to take another route where they ran into a check point by IPOB members.

    He added that the driver further said the IPOB members ordered the three of them in the car to disembark, and demanded to know their tribes.

    He said the driver told him he introduced himself as an Igbo person and that Gulak also said he was an Igbo man.

    But that while he (the driver) could speak the Igbo language when they were asked to speak in Igbo, Gulak could not, following which they asked him to remove his cap and saw a Muslim prayer marked on his forehead.

    The witness said the driver added that upon seeing the prayer marked, one of the IPOB members said “he is one of them,” following which they shot and killed him.

    The DSS official, who said he served In Imo between 2019 and 2023, told the court that the deceased’s corpse was evacuated from the spot where  he was killed in the witness’ car.

    When he was being cross examined by defence lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, the witness said there was no record of the importation of the transmitter said to have been smuggled in to the country by Kanu.

    He said he could not say when the transmitter was brought into the country, but that he was among those who located where it was kept in Anambra and brought it to the DSS headquarters in Abuja.

    On how they were able to locate the transmitter, the witness said his team used some equipment to analyse a video (showing Kanu inspecting the transmitter) to ascertain the location of the transmitter in Anambra.

    He said he did not come across the names Benka Clearing and Forwarding and Chief Isaac Maduka in the course of investigation.

    He also said he was not aware that Benka cleared the transmitter, as claimed by Ikpeazu.

    When asked if he was aware that Radio Biafra was registered in London and broadcast from there, the witness said when Kanu was arrested in Lagos in 2016, he was arrested with his broadcast equipments.

    He said he was not present when the defendant was arrested in Lagos and that all he said about his arrest in Lagos was what were relayed to him.

    The witness said the two guns found were not recovered in the container in which the transmitter was kept, but under the mattress of Benjamin Madubugu, who lived in the premises.

    The PW-4 said that Madubugu was later charged with unlawful possession of firearms.

    The witness said the container was brought into the country by one Igwe Anyiba, who was later found to be living outside the country.

    He said he was not aware that the Imo Government issued a statement to the effect that Gulak’s killing was political.

    After DDD concluded his evidence, Justice Omotosho discharged him from the witness box and adjourned until June 19 for continuation of trial.

  • DSS told to release Ogoni Youth Federation president

    DSS told to release Ogoni Youth Federation president

    The Ogoni Youth Federation has appealed to the Department of State Services (DSS) to release its President-General, Legborsi Yamaabana, from custody or arraign him without further delay.

    The group’s Vice President, Bonabo Saviour, made the appeal at a news briefing in Port Harcourt on Wednesday.

    Saviour said that Yamaabana had been in DSS detention since April 11 over false allegations, without arraignment.

    According to him, the DSS had repeatedly obtained remand orders that have expired without arraigning Yamaabana.

    He said that the repeated pattern of remand obtained by the DSS from court amounted to an abuse.

    He cited multiple and overlapping remand orders that violated the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, and the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria.

    Saviour further argued that the DSS’s actions were unlawful and contrary to the constitutional right to personal liberty, fair hearing, and human dignity.

    “We are calling on the DSS to immediately release Yamaabana or charge him to court, and allow him access to medication, his legal team, and family while investigations continue.

    “We also seek support from lovers of justice, civil society organisations, legal professionals, and the media to raise their voices against arbitrary detention and abuse of power,” he said.

    In a remark, the President of the National Youth Council of Ogoni People (NAICOP), Raymond Nwibani, also appealed to DSS to grant Yamaabana fair trial in a competent court of law.

    Nwibani expressed deep concern over Yamabana’s prolonged detention without trial.

    “As a youth body, we are saying that people should not be detained unlawfully, and we are not saying he should be released because he is above the law.

    “We are saying that as an accused, he should be given fair hearing to speak or address the situation,” he said.

    Nwibani emphasised the importance of justice and due process, adding that Yamaabana should be allowed his right to freedom, pending the outcome of investigations.

    “If the process of investigation is ongoing, then he should be granted his right to freedom, pending when he is found guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction,” he said.

    The NAICOP boss appealed to leaders of Rivers, Niger Delta, and Nigeria to consider the plea of Ogoni youths and ensure that justice was served.

    Also, a Legal practitioner and member of NAICOP, Mr Faith Kpabep, while acknowledging that “no one is above the law”, emphasised the need for due process and diligent prosecution.

    According to Kpabep, the group has no interest in obstructing justice, nor stopping prosecution, but it should be done professionally.

    “DSS has reportedly obtained three remand orders, each expiring without arraignment, so this is sparking concerns about the investigation progress.

    “We will escalate the matter by writing to the President, Inspector General of Police, and other security agencies, if necessary,” he said.

    He said that Yamaabana’s detention had lasted six weeks, with multiple remand orders. He wondered how many more weeks of remand that were needed for investigation.

    “We are concerned about due process of our rule of law. We seek a fair trial and proper prosecution. We also call for professionalism in the investigation,” Kpabep said.

  • DSS asks court to bar Pat Utomi from holding ‘shadow govt’ rallies

    DSS asks court to bar Pat Utomi from holding ‘shadow govt’ rallies

    The Department of State Services (DSS), on Wednesday, filed a fresh application against Prof. Pat Utomi at the Federal High Court in Abuja over his alleged plans to hold rallies in relation to the subject of a suit pending against him.

    The DSS, in the application filed through its lawyer, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, before Justice James Omotosho prayed the court to restrain Utomi and his associates from further making public comments or engaging in rallies in relation to the planned “shadow government” formation.

    Recall the DSS had, earlier, dragged Utomi, the 2007 Presidential Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), before Justice Omotosho over his alleged plan to establish what he called, “a shadow government” in the country.

    The security agency, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/937/2025, prayed the court to declare the move as an attack on the constitution and Justice Omotosho had fixed June 25 for the hearing.

    Meanwhile, the fresh motion filed before the presiding judge was against the reports that Utomi, who is said to be currently abroad, had planned to engage in protests, road shows, media interviews and related activities upon his return to the country on June 6.

    In the application filed on Wednesday, the DSS sought one relief.

    It prayed for an order of interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendant/respondent (Utomi), his agents  from staging road shows, rallies, public lectures or any form of public gathering, newspaper publications, television programmes, jingles or any other public enlightenment programm.

    The service, in its grounds of application, argued that, if not restrained, Utomi’s proposed rallies, road shows and actions would “constitute a serious threat to the public order, safety and national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria“.

    It said that as the agency statutorily empowered to safeguard the internal security of the country and prevent any threats to lawful authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its constituent institutions, it was incumbent on it to forstal any threat to public order, safety and national unity.

    It stated that before it filed the substantive suit, Utomi, a Professor of Political Economy and Management Expert, had,  through public statements, social media and other platforms engaged in statements and actions aimed at undermining the outcome of the case now pending  before the court, and which he is aware of.

    The DSS said it gathered through monitoring and intelligence reports that Utomi, who is currently out of the country and is due to return on June 6, plans “to stage road shows and rallies under the guise of freedom of speech and association in a bid to cause public discontent in furtherance of his establishment of the purported ‘shadow government/shadow cabinet.’

    The plaintiff added, in a supporting affidavit, that Utomi’s intention “is to stage road shows and rallies that are capable of drawing a large number of Nigerians with intent that will cause huge disruption of peace, breakdown of public order, enable riots and violent protests just as the recent “End SARS” protests in 2020.

    “All the planned protests, riots and agitations that will ensue, if the purported actions of the defendant/respondent are not stayed, may lead to mayhem with a potential for anarchy, loss of lives and property.

    “The proposed allies, road shows and actions of the defendant/respondent constitutes a serious threat to the public order, safety and national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    The DSS stated that on May 26  during the fourth edition of the Topaz Lecture Series, themed; “Shadow Government: A Distraction or Necessity”, hosted by the University of Lagos (UNILAG) Mass Communication Class of 1988 Alumni Association, Utomi made statements, capable of undermining the pending suit.

    It added that in the statements, widely publicised by various national newspapers and on social media platforms, Utomi defended the creation of the purported shadow government and further stated that if the suit succeeds in favour of the DSS, himself and his group shall adopt a different name.

    The agency added that Utomi had been served with the originating process in this suit and had entered appearance vide his Counsel, Prof. Mike Ozekhome (SAN) since 20 May, 2025.

    “The defendant/respondent (Utomi) is aware of the pendency of this action before this honourable court as he has been served with the originating process in this suit by courier as ordered by this honourable court.

    “Unless this honourable court intervenes by granting this application, the defendant/respondent’s acts may foist a fait accompli on the court.

    “It is in the interest of justice, national security, and the rule of law for this honourable court to grant this application,” the DSS said.

    Speaking shortly after filing the fresh application, DSS’ lawyer, Kehinde, SAN, explained the rationale behind his client’s decision to approach the court.

    Kehinde said: “We, as counsel to the DSS have just filed an application seeking interlocutory injunction against the defendant and his group pending the determination of the substantive suit.

    “The application, being a public document can be obtained from the registry of the honourable court.

    “It is good that as members of the 4th estate of the realm you are keeping watch over the case filed against the formation of ‘Shadow Government’ by Prof. Pat Utomi and his group.

    “The civil suit, as you are aware, was filed by the State Security Service (also known as DSS) in consonance with its statutory mandate of ensuring internal peace and avoidance of any form of insurrection and treasonable felony against the democratically elected government in the country.”

    He said the application was filed because Utomi had continued to make inflammatory statements capable of igniting chaos in the country instead of abiding by the hallowed principle that civilised parties before the court were expected to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the substantive matter.

    “What our client has submitted to the court is for the interpretation of the constitution whether any form of government by whatever nomenclature can be formed or allowed outside the constitution.

    “Furthermore, our client is not interested at arresting anybody in respect of this matter having on its own accord submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the honourable court to interpret the constitution and determine the legality or otherwise of the ‘Shadow Government’ or any other nomenclature that it may be so named.

    “It must be pointed out that our client under its current leadership is a very civilised organisation with absolute confidence in the rule of law.

    ”Its personnel will always approach the court of law whenever it feels that there is any infraction on its statutory duties by anyone or the rights of its personnel. Let the court have the final say.

    “Gentlemen, we must all ensure that constitutional democracy and the rule of law have its way in Nigeria,” Kehinde said.

  • Finally, DSS grants family access to detained NANS president

    Finally, DSS grants family access to detained NANS president

    After more than a month in custody without charges, the Department of State Services (DSS) has finally allowed the family of Atiku Abubakar Isah, the embattled President of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), to visit him.

    The decision follows increasing public pressure and media scrutiny surrounding his controversial detention.

    Isah has been held incommunicado by the DSS amid a high-profile scandal involving Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. His arrest and continued detention have sparked widespread concerns over due process, alleged human rights violations, and political intimidation.

    A family source confirmed that Isah’s wife, accompanied by a relative, her infant child, and a driver, was granted access to see him at the DSS headquarters in Abuja.

    “Barrister Deji Adeyanju reached out and informed us that we had finally been cleared to visit Isah,” the source disclosed.
    “He advised Isah’s wife to call the DSS to confirm, and after she provided her details, they were permitted to enter the facility.”

    Despite being denied access the previous day Monday despite following official procedures and submitting a formal visitation request, the family’s persistence eventually paid off. One relative who had accompanied them earlier had already returned home, assuming Tuesday’s attempt would also be futile.

    “Thankfully, we were let in. His wife was able to see him and speak with him,” the source added.

    Following the visit, Isah’s wife confirmed that he was in stable health, though visibly fatigued from the prolonged ordeal. DSS operatives reportedly reassured her that his release would come soon.

    Mounting Concerns Over Health and Detention Conditions

    The visit came on the heels of intensifying concerns about Isah’s deteriorating health, with activists and legal advocates raising alarms about his welfare. His month-long detention without trial or formal charges has drawn criticism from human rights groups, students’ unions, and civil society organizations.

    Background: A Controversial Bribery Allegation and Assault Claims

    Isah’s ordeal began after he publicly accused Seyi Tinubu of offering him a ₦100 million bribe to step down as NANS President. Isah claimed he rejected the offer, after which he was allegedly abducted, stripped, and beaten in the presence of the Managing Director of the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), before being transferred to DSS custody.

    He also alleged that a rival faction within NANS reportedly enjoying the backing of Seyi Tinubu attacked him, inflicting severe injuries.

    ₦38.3 Billion Lawsuit Filed Against DSS, NTA, and Seyi Tinubu

    On May 14, 2025, Isah filed a ₦38.3 billion fundamental human rights enforcement suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The suit names the DSS, the NTA, and Seyi Tinubu as defendants, accusing them of abduction, illegal detention, torture, and character defamation.

    He is also seeking a court injunction to prevent further threats to his life and to mandate his immediate release from DSS custody.

  • DSS compensates man shot by its operative with ₦20 million

    DSS compensates man shot by its operative with ₦20 million

    The Department of State Services (DSS) has awarded a Sokoto State-born businessman (name withheld) who was inadvertently shot during a security operation ₦20 million in compensation for the traumatic experience.

    TheNewsGuru understands that in mid-March, the DSS Director-General, Tosin Ajayi, approved the payment of ₦10 million damages awarded by a court to the businessman six years earlier. 

    To compensate for the time lost, the DSS DG presented the businessman with an additional ₦10 million, resulting in a cumulative total of ₦20 million.

    At the time, Mr. Ajayi directed the DSS hospital to officially integrate the businessman into the Service’s medical care system, which would enable him to enjoy free medical services anytime he so desired.

    Confirming the medical treatment, a security source said the businessman arrived in the hospital “A few days ago, and has been undergoing free medical tests and treatment from the hospital’s best doctors.”

    He said, “True to the DG’s directive, the man has been in the VIP ward which, of course, is fully air-conditioned. They have been running series of checks and giving him round-the-clock medical attention, in order to make him regain full control of his limbs. I even understand the DG asked that he be fed for free.”

    It would be noted that in 2016, during a pre-dawn operation to arrest a suspected gunrunner in Jos, Plateau State, DSS operatives mistakenly shot and injured the businessman, who incidentally bears the same name with the suspected gunrunner. The gunrunner was eventually arrested.

    Two years after the shooting, in 2018, the businessman, through his lawyer, Idris Akibu, approached a Federal High Court in Bauchi State. Delivering judgement on the matter with suit number FHC/J/CS/18/2018, the court, presided by Justice Muhammed Shittu Abubakar, ordered the DSS to pay ₦10 million in damages to the injured businessman.

    “This is the third DG since this unfortunate case of mistaken identity happened. We were very happy when our new DG directed that we pay the money. He even added another ₦10 million to the victim’s money. It goes to show that, not only can security agencies be law abiding, we can also be full of the milk of human kindness,” the source added.

  • Shadow govt: Court announces date for DSS vs Pat Utomi case

    Shadow govt: Court announces date for DSS vs Pat Utomi case

    The Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, fixed June 25 for the hearing of a suit filed by the Department of State Services (DSS) against Prof. Pat Utomi over his alleged plan to establish what he called, “a shadow government” in the country.

    Justice James Omotosho fixed the date after DSS’ counsel, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, moved a motion ex-parte to serve court documents on Utomi in his Lagos address by means of courier service.

    The development followed the inability of the plaintiff to effect the service of the court papers on Utomi, a Professor of Political Economy and Management Expert.

    The security agency gave Utomi’s Lagos address as, “No. 6, Balarabe Musa Crescent, off Samuel Manuwa Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, State.”

    After Kehinde argued the motion, Justice Omotosho granted the application and ordered Utomi to be served by substituted means.

    The judge adjourned the matter until June 25 for hearing.

    DSS, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/937/2025, prayed the court to declare the planned shadow government as an attack on the constitution.

    In the suit, Utomi, the 2007 Presidential Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), is sued as sole defendant.

    The security outfit, in the suit filed on May 13 by Kehinde contended that the move by Utomi was intended to create chaos and destabilise the country.

    The DSS argued that not only was the planned shadow government an aberration, it constituted a grave attack on the constitution and a threat to the democratically elected government that is currently in place.

    It expressed concern that such a structure, styled as a “shadow government,” if left unchecked, may incite political unrest, cause inter-group tensions, and embolden other unlawful actors or separatist entities to replicate similar parallel arrangements, all of which would pose a grave threat to national security.

    The plaintiff, therefore, urged the court to declare the purported “shadow government” or “shadow cabinet” being planned by Utomi and his associates as “unconstitutional and amounts to an attempt to create a parallel authority not recognised by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”

    The department also sought a declaration that “under Sections 1(1), 1(2) and 14(2)(a) of the Constitution, the establishment or operation of any governmental authority or structure outside the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) is unconstitutional, null, and void.”

    The plaintiff prayed the court to issue an order of perpetual injunction, restraining Utomi, his agents and associates “from further taking any steps towards the establishment or operation of a ‘shadow government,’ ‘shadow cabinet’ or any similar entity not recognized by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”

    The plaintiff, in its grounds of argument, hinged its prayers on the fact that Section 1(1) of the Constitution declares its supremacy and binding force on all persons and authorities in Nigeria.

    It added that Section 1(2) prohibits the governance of Nigeria or any part thereof except in accordance with the provisions of the constitution.

    According to the DSS, Section 14(2Xa) states that sovereignty belongs to the people of Nigeria, from whom government through the constitution derives all its powers and authority.

    It contended that Utomi’s proposed shadow government lacked constitutional recognition and authority, thereby contravening the aforementioned provisions.

    The plaintiff further stated in a supporting affidavit that it is the principal domestic intelligence and security agency of the Federal Republic of Nigeria statutorily mandated to detect and prevent threats to the internal security of Nigeria, including subversive activities capable of undermining national unity, peace and constitutional order.

    The DSS added that it is statutorily empowered to safeguard the internal security of Nigeria and prevent any threats to the lawful authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Its constituent institutions.

    It stated that it has monitored, “through intelligence reports and open source material, public statements and interviews granted by the defendant, Professor Patrick Utomi, in which he announced the purported establishment of what he temed a ‘shadow government’ or ‘shadow cabinet,’comprising of several persons that make up its ‘Minister.’

    “The ‘shadow government’ or ‘shadow cabinet’ is an unregistered and unrecognised body claiming to operate as an alternative government. contrary to the provision of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

    “The defendant (Utomi), through public statements, social media, and other platforms, has announced the formation of this body with the intent to challenge the legitimacy of the democratically elected government of Nigeria.

    “While inaugurating the ‘shadow cabinet’, the defendant stated that it ls made up of the Ombudsman and Good Governance portfolio to be manned by Dele Farotimi; the Policy Delivery Unit Team consisting of Oghene Momoh, Cheta Nwanze, Daniel Ikuonobe, Halima Ahmed, David Okonkwo and Obi Ajuga: and the council of economic advisers.

    “Based on the intelligence gathered by the plaintiff, the activities and statements made by the defendant and his associates are capable of misleading segments of the Nigerian public, weakening confidence in the legitimacy of the elected government, and fuelling public disaffection,” it said.

    The DSS said in the discharge of Its statutory duties, it had gathered intelligence confirming that the defendant’s actions pose a clear and present danger to Nigeria’s constitutional democracy.

    “The defendant’s actions amount to an attempt to usurp or mimic executive authority, contrary to Sections 1(1), 1{2), and 14(2Xa) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended), which exclusively vests governance in institutions duly created under the constitution and through democratic elections.

    “The Federal Government of Nigeria has made several efforts to engage the defendant to dissuade him from this unconstitutional path, including statements made by the Minister of Information, but the defendant has remained defiant.”

    The agency said that it would be in the interest of justice, national security and the rule of law for the court to declare the existence and operations of the defendant unconstitutional and illegal.

  • DSS drags Prof. Pat Utomi to court

    DSS drags Prof. Pat Utomi to court

    The Department of State Services (DSS) has sued Prof. Pat Utomi over his alleged plan to establish what he called, “a shadow government” in the country.

    The DSS, in a suit filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, prayed the court to declare the move as an attack on the constitution.

    In the fresh suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/937/2025, Utomi, the 2007 Presidential Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), is sued as sole defendant.

    The security outfit, in the suit filed on May 13 by Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, contended that the move by Utomi was intended to create chaos and destabilise the country.

    The DSS argued that not only was the planned shadow government an aberration, it constituted a grave attack on the constitution and a threat to the democratically elected government that is currently in place.

    It expressed concern that such a structure, styled as a “shadow government,” if left unchecked, may incite political unrest, cause inter-group tensions, and embolden other unlawful actors or separatist entities to replicate similar parallel arrangements, all of which would pose a grave threat to national security.

    The plaintiff, therefore, urged the court to declare the purported “shadow government” or “shadow cabinet” being planned by Utomi and his associates as “unconstitutional and amounts to an attempt to create a parallel authority not recognised by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”

    It is also sought a declaration that “under Sections 1(1), 1(2) and 14(2)(a) of the Constitution, the establishment or operation of any governmental authority or structure outside the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) is unconstitutional, null, and void.”

    The plaintiff prayed the court to issue an order of perpetual injunction, restraining Utomi, his agents and associates “from further taking any steps towards the establishment or operation of a ‘shadow government,’ ‘shadow cabinet’ or any similar entity not recognized by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”

    The plaintiff, in its grounds of argument, hinged its prayers on the fact that Section 1(1) of the Constitution declares its supremacy and binding force on all persons and authorities in Nigeria.

    It added that Section 1(2) prohibits the governance of Nigeria or any part thereof except in accordance with the provisions of the constitution.

    According to the DSS, Section 14(2Xa) states that sovereignty belongs to the people of Nigeria, from whom government through the constitution derives all its powers and authority.

    It contended that Utomi’s proposed shadow government lacked constitutional recognition and authority, thereby contravening the aforementioned provisions.

    The plaintiff further stated in a supporting affidavit that it is the principal domestic intelligence and security agency of the Federal Republic of Nigeria statutorily mandated to detect and prevent threats to the internal security of Nigeria, including subversive activities capable of undermining national unity, peace and constitutional order.

    The DSS added that it is statutorily empowered to safeguard the internal security of Nigeria and prevent any threats to the lawful authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Its constituent institutions.

    It stated that it has monitored, “through intelligence reports and open source material, public statements and interviews granted by the defendant, Professor Patrick Utomi, in which he announced the purported establishment of what he temed a ‘shadow government’ or ‘shadow cabinet,’comprising of several persons that make up its ‘Minister.’

    “The ‘shadow government’ or ‘shadow cabinet’ is an unregistered and unrecognised body claiming to operate as an alternative government. contrary to the provision of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

    “The defendant (Utomi), through public statements, social media, and other platforms, has announced the formation of this body with the intent to challenge the legitimacy of the democratically elected government of Nigeria.

    “While inaugurating the ‘shadow cabinet’, the defendant stated that it ls made up of the Ombudsman and Good Governance portfolio to be manned by Dele Farotimi; the Policy Delivery Unit Team consisting of Oghene Momoh, Cheta Nwanze, Daniel Ikuonobe, Halima Ahmed, David Okonkwo and Obi Ajuga: and the council of economic advisers.

    “Based on the intelligence gathered by the plaintiff, the activities and statements made by the defendant and his associates are capable of misleading segments of the Nigerian public, weakening confidence in the legitimacy of the elected government, and fuelling public disaffection,” it said.

    The DSS said in the discharge of Its statutory duties, it had gathered intelligence confirming that the defendant’s actions pose a clear and present danger to Nigeria’s constitutional democracy.

    “The defendant’s actions amount to an attempt to usurp or mimic executive authority, contrary to Sections 1(1), 1{2), and 14(2Xa) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended), which exclusively vests governance in institutions duly created under the constitution and through democratic elections.

    “The Federal Government of Nigeria has made several efforts to engage the defendant to dissuade him from this unconstitutional path, including statements made by the Minister of Information, but the defendant has remained defiant.”

    The agency said it would be In the interest of justice, national security and the rule of law for the court to declare the existence and operations of the defendant unconstitutional and illegal.

    The suit is yet to be assigned to any judge for hearing.