Tag: EFCC

  • Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello tenders apology, granted N500m bail

    Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello tenders apology, granted N500m bail

    Former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello has apologized to Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Maitama, Abuja, for failing to appear in court for his trial, and admitted to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum.

    Bello, through his counsel, J.B. Daudu SAN, expressed regret for any perceived disrespect toward the court, saying: “My lord, I am apologizing on behalf of the defendant for any perceived disrespect toward the court in the past”.

    Addressing the court, the defence counsel  clarified that the defendant’s earlier actions were not intended as contempt.

    “For the record, my lord, I wish to apologize for any impression that the defendant refused to appear before your Lordship. He directed his former counsel to challenge the court’s jurisdiction, which led the matter up to the Supreme Court. This was not an act of disrespect but a procedural move,” he said

    Continuing, he stressed that,  “The defendant, a two-term governor of Kogi State, holds the court in the highest regard. I assure this honourable court that he will appear for trial on all adjourned dates, barring sickness or death.”

    Bello is facing a 19-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering, contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended).

    One of the charges read: “That you, Yahaya Adoza Bello, Ali Bello, Dauda Suleiman, and Abdulsalam Hudu (still at large), sometime in February 2016 in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired amongst yourselves to convert the total sum of ₦80,246,470,089.88 (Eighty Billion, Two Hundred and Forty-Six Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Thousand and Eighty-Nine Naira, Eighty-Eight Kobo), which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity to wit: criminal breach of trust, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011, as amended.”

    Other charges include alleged fraudulent transactions involving billions of naira and foreign currency, carried out between 2016 and 2023 through various companies. Bello pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    Daudu sought bail for his client, applauding the understanding  of the prosecution. “I must express profound respect for my learned silk for the prosecution, Dr. Kemi Pinheiro SAN. He shared a soft copy of the counter-affidavit before today’s proceedings, and we agreed to avoid unnecessary arguments. We urge the court to grant bail on reasonable terms and conditions,” he said.

    Responding, Pinheiro praised the defence counsel’s professionalism. “I must acknowledge the integrity of J.B. Daudu SAN. We have worked to streamline the proceedings and reduce the burden on your Lordship. The EFCC is a professional, not a persecutorial body. However, the decision to grant bail and its conditions are entirely at the court’s discretion,”he said.

    Pinheiro also noted the defendant’s apology, adding, “Let it be on record that the defendant has apologized through his counsel.”

    Justice Nwite, while delivering his ruling, emphasized his independence. “Neither party will guide me on what to do. However, given the assurances by J.B. Daudu SAN, I am inclined to grant bail. But for  these assurances, my ruling might have been otherwise,” the judge stated.

    The court granted  Bello bail in the sum of ₦500 million, with two sureties in like sum. The sureties must own properties within the court’s jurisdiction. Bello is also required to deposit his international passport with the Deputy Chief Registrar of the court, submit recent passport photographs, and swear an affidavit of means.

    Until the bail conditions are met, Justice Nwite ordered that Bello be remanded at the Nigerian Correctional Centre, Kuje and adjourned the trial to February 24 and 28, as well as March 6 and 7, 2025, for continuation of trial.

    Court admits ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello to N500m bail

    A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, admitted the immediate-past Governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum.

    Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling, ordered that the two sureties must be landed property owners within the jurisdiction the court. Justice Nwite ordered that the sureties must sworn to affidavit of means which must be verified by the court registrar.

    The judge, who ordered the former governor to submit his international passport to the court, directed the sureties to equally submit two copies of their passport photographs each. He ordered the defendant to be remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre pending the perfection of his bail. Justice Nwite subsequently adjourned the matter until Feb. 24, Feb. 28, March 6 and March 7, 2025 for trial.

    Bello pleaded not guilty to the 19-count charge brought against him by the EFCC. The ex-governor is facing an alleged money laundering trial to the tune of N80 billion.

    When the case was called for hearing, on Friday, counsel for the EFCC, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, notified the court of the intention of the prosecution to withdraw an earlier application for abridgment of the earlier date fixed for arraignment. He said the application had been overtaken by events.

    The lawyer to the former governor, Joseph Daudu, SAN, did not object and Justice Nwite, accordingly granted the request. After the defendant had taken his plea, Daudu made clarifications on the reasons he had not been in court during the previous hearings.

    “I would like to place on record that for any impression that might have been created that the defendant did not wish to appear before your lordship. Coincidentally, the ruling on my lord’s sitting this morning dealt with the issue of jurisdiction.

    “What the defendant did was to ask his counsel to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, which got to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. So it was not a wishful disrespect but he was only trying to defend himself.

    “So we all hold your lordship in high esteem. If that impression must have been, he would not have presented himself for arraignment. That episode is gone and things are clearer now,” he said.

    While moving an application for bail, Daudu assured that the former governor would always be present in court for the trial.

    “I am saying this with the highest sense of responsibility that the defendant, a two-term governor of Kogi State, who travelled only two times out of his eight years in service, will always be present in court at all times.

    “There should be no apprehension that he will jump bail. So we urge your lordship to grant us very reasonable conditions of bail such that he will be able to bear,” he added.

    He commended the prosecution counsel, saying he had conducted himself on the best tradition because the matter was not a do-or-die one.

    He said they had agreed that the counsel would not stress the court over the issue of bail. The Prosecution Counsel concurred. Responding, Pinheiro also thanked Daudu for his assurance.

    He confirmed that both lawyers had had discussion on the issue of bail for the defendant.

    “I must express my honour to the very eminent lead senior counsel. He is a man of immense stature, not because of his size.

    “I do respect him as president of NBA. I also confirm that we have been engaging in series of discussions to ease the burden on your lordship in compliance with Rule 26 of Rules of Professional Ethics.

    “I also note that your lordship had delivered not less than five rulings in this matter and it is our aim to ease the work.

    “We are prosecutors not persecutors. So EFCC is a professional commission; a prosecutorial and not persecutorial commission,” he said.

    “We accept the assurances of the very eminent SAN that the defendant will make himself available subject to your lordship’s discretionary terms that may be imposed.

    “By so doing, we will ease the burden on the court. Therefore, we will not be opposing the eminent SAN’s submission,” he said.

    Pinheiro said though they had filed a counter-affidavit, they would not oppose the bail, going by the assurances of Daudu.

    Ruling on the bail application, Justice Nwite said, “I have listened to the submissions of both counsels. It is not in dispute that both counsels have filed applications in respect of the bail application.”

    He said the right of the defendant and the prosecution must be taken into account in granting bail.

    The judge held that having not opposed the bail plea, he was minded to change his earlier stand on the matter.

    The ex-governor was earlier, on Tuesday, remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre by an High Court in Abuja on a fresh N110 billion charge by EFCC, pending his bail application.

  • EFCC arrests 23 suspected internet fraudsters

    EFCC arrests 23 suspected internet fraudsters

    Operatives of Ibadan Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), have arrested 23 suspected internet fraudsters.

    Its Spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, said this in a statement on Wednesday in Abuja.

    According to him, the internet fraudsters were arrested at Akobo area of Ibadan in Oyo State following credible intelligence linking them with suspected involvement in fraudulent internet activities.

    ”Items recovered from them include eight exotic cars, laptops, phones and a play station game,  among others. The suspects will be charged to court upon conclusion of investigations,” he said.

  • BREAKING: Ex-Governor Yahaya Bello denied bail

    BREAKING: Ex-Governor Yahaya Bello denied bail

    Justice Maryann Anenih of a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) high court on Tuesday struck out the bail application filed by former governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State.

    Anenih struck out the application on the grounds that it was filed when the former governor was yet to be taken into custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The application was filed on November 22, while the former governor was taken into custody of the anti-graft agency on November 26 and arraigned on November 27.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the former Governor and his co-defendants; Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu are facing prosecution on 16-count charge filed against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Bello is being prosecuted by the EFCC over alleged fraud when he served as governor of the north-central state. The former Governor has been in detention of the agency after he presented himself before the anti-graft agency in November.

  • Why we did not reveal owners of Abuja estate with 753 duplexes – EFCC

    Why we did not reveal owners of Abuja estate with 753 duplexes – EFCC

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has disclosed why it did not reveal the names of the individuals involved in the recent 753 duplexes and other apartments forfeited to the federal government.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the EFCC to have said it will be unprofessional to do so, adding that “substantive criminal investigation on the matter still continues”.

    Flurry of reactions have trailed the record-breaking recovery of 753 duplexes and other apartments on Plot 109 Cadastral Zone C09, Lokogoma District, Abuja by the EFCC.

    This is after the EFCC failed to mention the names of individuals directly linked to the properties.

    Activist Omoyele Sowore subsequently disclosed that the 753 duplexes forfeited belonged to embattled former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mr Godwin Emefiele.

    Sowore alleged that Emefiele built the estate and more with kickbacks and questioned why the EFCC opted to cover up his identity.

    Reacting, the anti graft agency stated: “The commentaries of reform-minded Nigerians to the Commission’s painstaking efforts in securing the final forfeiture of the Estate to the Federal Government of Nigeria, are appreciated.

    “However, the denigration of such efforts by Omoyele Sowore and his think-same and act-same, is unacceptable and grossly un-charitable.

    “The allegation of a  cover up of the identity of the promoters of the Estate stands logic on the head in the sense that the proceedings for the forfeiture of the Estate were in line with Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud Act which is a civil proceeding that allows for action-in-rem rather than action-in-personam.

    “The latter allows legal actions against a property and not an individual, especially in a situation of an unclaimed property. This Act allows you to take up a forfeiture proceeding against a chattel that is not a juristic person. This is exactly what the Commission did in respect of the Estate”.

    The EFCC went on to State: “The proceedings that yielded the final forfeiture of the Estate were products of actionable intelligence available to the Commission.

    “The company flagged by our investigations denied ownership of the Estate following publications made in leading national newspapers.

    “On the basis of this, the Commission approached the court for an order of final forfeiture which Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie of the Federal Capital Territory,  FCT, High Court granted on Monday,  December 2,  2024.

    “The expectation of the EFCC from citizen Sowore is a patriotic appreciation of its efforts in securing such a landmark forfeiture.

    “It is shocking that the activist is not concerned about the systemic lassitude and unhelpful permissiveness that allowed such a monstrous corrupt act in the first instance.

    “Nigerians should gear up more against lapses and loopholes in our system that continue to make the nation vulnerable to corrupt tendencies.

    “The EFCC will continue to safeguard the financial space of the nation against manipulators and organised brigandage.

    “It is important to note that the substantive criminal investigation on the matter still continues.

    “It will be unprofessional of the EFCC to go to town by mentioning names of individuals whose identities were not directly linked to any title document of the properties.

    “The EFCC is unwavering in its no-sacred-cow approach to every matter and together we will make Nigeria greater”.

  • Largest ever’ asset recovery: Sowore drags EFCC for hiding owner Of seized 753 duplexes In Abuja

    Largest ever’ asset recovery: Sowore drags EFCC for hiding owner Of seized 753 duplexes In Abuja

    Activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has called out the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, for hiding the identity of a top government official who owns a property which spans 150,500 square meters and comprises 753 units of duplexes and various other apartments, marking it as the largest single asset recovered by the agency since its establishment in 2003.

    TheNewsGuru.com(TNG) reports that the spokesperson for the anti-corruption agency, Dele Oyewale, in a statement to newsmen on Monday, December 2nd, disclosed that the individual forfeited the property, although his identity was not mentioned, but Oyewale said it belonged to a “former top brass of the government”.

    He said, “The road to the final forfeiture of the property was paved by an interim forfeiture order, secured before the same Judge on November 1, 2024.

    “The government official which fraudulently built the estate is being investigated by the EFCC. The forfeiture of the asset is an important modality of depriving the suspect of the proceeds of the crime.

    “In this instance, the Commission relied on Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud And Other Fraud Related Offences Act No 14, 2006 and Section 44 (2) B of the Constitution of the 199 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to push its case.

    “The Establishment Act of the Commission places huge emphasis on asset recovery.”

    Reacting, Sowore, via his verified Facebook page on Tuesday, slammed the anti-graft agency for hiding the identity of the property owner, but yet parade easily suspects who are Yahoo boys.

    He added that the EFCC is currently afraid of ‘big’ thieves.

    He wrote, “What is the name of the “former top brass” with 753 duplexes seized by the EFCC in Abuja?

    “The @officialEFCC is now doing PR for thieves. They seized this large estate with 753 duplexes from a single individual in Abuja but can’t mention his or her name.

    “If it is Yahoo boys, they will line laptops and Nokia phones in front of them and send their photos globally even before their trial is commenced. The same EFCC is now AFRAID of BIG Thieves!”

  • EFCC vs Bello: Trivialising corruption allegations – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    EFCC vs Bello: Trivialising corruption allegations – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    In my November 18, 2024, article entitled, “That ‘fake’ Sanwo-Olu vs EFCC suit: Whodunit it? Who sponsored it?” I held that snapets from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) moves to investigate, arrest, detain and prosecute ex-governors “are telegraphed a few months or weeks before they bow out of office,” so giving them the jitters to “either begin to express being squeaky clean, alleging political witch-hunt or daring the EFCC to carry out its threat to make them account for their stewardship.”

    I however observed that lately, the anti-graft agency’s threat against former governors “has become mostly academic, and the norm rather than the exception,” adding that, “it appears some ex-governors now relish being dragged by the EFCC, at least, as a way to keeping themselves in the news after missing the years of free spotlighting.”

    Former Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State has mostly proved these assertions right, even as he finally presented himself to the EFCC for “arrest and detention,” and arraignment and prosecution for alleged looting of Kogi’s resources during his eight-year tenure in office (2016-2024).

    For months, Bello’s engaged in a hide-and-seek, only to suddenly show up at the EFCC headquarters in Abuja on September 18, and yet wasn’t booked, interrogated, or detained – as he’s on the wanted list of the agency and the courts – but with the commission reportedly asking him to leave and come back at a later date. Why?

    EFCC’s intel reportedly indicated that Bello’s prepared for a showdown, having allegedly stormed the premises with armed details. Thus, the authorities tactically allowed him to while away for hours in one of the offices. Indeed, EFCC’s later efforts that night to arrest Bello at the Kogi State Government Lodge in Asokoro, Abuja, were allegedly thwarted by his armed guards.

    Bello, facing a couple of EFCC’s alleged fraudulent cases in courts in Abuja, continued in his disappearing act, while the commission failed in its attempts to force his trial – in absentia – before Justice Emeka Nwite on October 30 at the Federal High Court in Abuja, where Bello’s facing a 19-count charge for alleged laundering of N84bn.

    But on November 26, Bello – billed for arraignment since April 2024 – reappeared at the EFCC headquarters in Abuja, and this time, the agency “detained” him overnight in the facility he’d avoided for months, as he shunned invitations and court summons to answer for his alleged looting of resources during his governorship of ‘The Confluence State’.

    And on November 27, the EFCC arraigned Bello and two others – Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalam Hudu – before Justice Maryanne Anenih of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 16-count charge for conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and possession of unlawfully-obtained property, amounting to N110.4bn.

    After some legal fireworks over bail for the three defendants between the lead counsel for the accused, Joseph Daudu (SAN) and the EFCC, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), Justice Anenih adjourned ruling on the application to December 10, and directed that the defendants should remain in the EFCC custody.

    This notwithstanding the EFCC administrative bail granted to Oricha and Hudu, which Pinheiro argued had expired in October, but with Daudu pointing to a fresh application of November 22, based on the fact that the defendants deserve their liberty on the presumption of innocence until they’re proven guilty, as alleged.

    Meanwhile, Bello certainly was in a celebratory mood when – for the first time in over seven months of a cat-and-mouse game with the EFCC – he’s docked for the alleged N110.4bn theft of Kogi’s resources. Dressed in a pair of contact lenses, and a light sky-blue attire, Bello, amidst a throng of aides and political associates,  walked energetically through the expansive premises and into the courtroom of the FCT High Court.

    As he covered the distance from the parking lot to the courtroom, Bello’s all smiles – as he turned right and waved with the right hand, and then turned left and waved with the left hand – to acknowledge greetings and cheers from his supporters, many of whom sandwiched him into the court, where he continued to return courtesies even while in the dock to plead not guilty to the charges preferred against him.

    Perhaps to Bello, his arraignment was a moment to savour, and bask in the frenzy of journalists and EFCC’s operatives scrambling to capture and record his every posture and every gesture as evidence, and for prime-time broadcast and publication in the mainstream and online media.

    A similar scenario played out on November 29, at the Federal High Court in Abuja, where Bello couldn’t take his plea, and had to “stand for himself” in the absence of his lead lawyer in the suit, Abdulwahab Mohammed (SAN).

    With well-armed security operatives falling over themselves to dominate the court premises, Bello, with a more somber mien this time, and accompanied by aides, supporters and operatives of the EFCC, still walked briskly into the courtroom, with the door quickly closed behind him.

    Once inside, as reported by PUNCH ONLINE, Bello told trial Justice Emeka Nwite that he won’t take any plea, as he’s only made aware of his arraignment in the night of November 28, and couldn’t get across to his lawyer, Mohammed (SAN). This prompted the judge – in the interest of fair hearing – to order that Mohammed be put on notice for the adjourned date of December 13, and for Bello and his co-defendants to be reminded in the EFCC custody.

    The EFCC lawyer, Pinheiro (SAN), attempted to convince Justice Nwite to commence the trial without Bello’s counsel, arguing that, “What the law requires is the presence of the defendant, not the presence of his lawyers.”

    This was reportedly a rehash of a similar argument at the sitting on October 30, when Pinheiro requested that the court proceed with the trial. Noting that two witnesses were present and ready to testify,” Pinheiro suggested that the “court enter a plea of not guilty on Bello’s behalf and commence the trial.”

    But as in that prior instance, the judge turned down Pinheiro’s entreaty on November 29, citing Bello’s right to a fair hearing, and reminding the EFCC lawyer that, at the October court session, the matter was adjourned to January 21, 2025.

    “The matter came up on the 30th of October 2024. It was adjourned to 21st January 2025. From the statement of the defendant, his lawyers are not aware of today’s (November 29) date. In the interest of fair hearing, I will not proceed for arraignment,” Justice Nwite said.

    “This matter is peculiar in the sense that we have already agreed on a date, which is in January. It will be unfair if the matter is taken without the defendant’s counsel. It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel.

    “Since the defendant has said his counsel is not aware of today’s proceeding, I am of the view that a bench warrant cannot be sacrificed on the altar of fair hearing. The defendant deserves to be represented by counsel,” the judge added.

    After the court waited for 45 minutes, “but with no sign of the defence counsel,” Justice Nwite adjourned the matter, directed that Bello remain in the EFCC custody until the next hearing on December 13, and granted Pinheiro’s application for “new date hearing motions and possible arraignment to be served on the defendant’s counsel.”

    As the clock ticks towards December 10 at the FCT High Court, and December 13 at the Federal High Court both in Abuja, will Bello and his co-defendants get a bail reprieve, or be further remanded in the EFCC custody, or sent behind bars at one of Nigeria’s capital city’s jail houses, to spend the Yuletide season there? Such would be a canny experience the ex-governor had fought strenuously for months to avoid!

     

    Mr Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria. Can be reached on X, Threads, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp @EhichioyaEzomon. Tel: 08033078357.

  • Bobrisky’s fundamental rights suit filed against EFCC trashed

    Bobrisky’s fundamental rights suit filed against EFCC trashed

    A Federal High Court in Lagos State has trashed a fundamental rights suit filed by Okuneye Idris Olanrewaju, popularly known as Bobrisky, against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Bobrisky had sought N200 million from the EFCC for “psychotic trauma” and demanded N1 billion from the National Assembly for the “violation of his right to a fair hearing.”

    He also urged the court to restrain the EFCC and the National Assembly from “harassing, detaining, or declaring him wanted.”

    Bobrisky has been embroiled in controversy after social media influencer Martins Otse leaked an audio recording alleging that he paid the EFCC N15 million to drop money laundering charges against him.

    Delivering judgement on the case, Justice Alexander Owoeye ruled on November 28, that Bobrisky’s claims of rights violations lacked merit and were unsupported by credible evidence.

    The EFCC’s spokesman, Dele Oyewale, disclosed this in a statement on Friday.

    “Having evaluated the evidence placed before this Court by the Applicant, it is evident that the Applicant has failed to provide credible evidence to justify the award of the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought by him,” the judge ruled.

    “I hold that the claims of violation of fundamental rights against the 1st and 2nd Respondents were not made out of the affidavit evidence placed before this Court.

    The Applicant’s claims against the 1st and 2nd Respondents lack merit and are accordingly dismissed.”

    Justice Owoeye also refused to award damages against the EFCC.

  • EFCC: Delta non-indigenes absolves Okowa of wrongdoings

    EFCC: Delta non-indigenes absolves Okowa of wrongdoings

    Non-indigenes community in Delta State, Friday, accused persons they described as detractors of former Governor of the state, Senator Dr Ifeanyi Okowa, of deliberate mischief and malice, saying they were enemies of Delta.

    They said that the persons behind the petitions and media trial of the former governor took that course because they were afraid of Okowa’s towering personality in the political space in the state and country.

    The group, which comprised Arewa, Yoruba, Igbo, Middle belt, Igala, South-South among others, stated this when they visited Okowa at his residence in Asaba, over his recent invitation by Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over allegation of misappropriation of state’s funds.

    Speaking through the leader of the Arewa community in the state, Alhaji Auwalu Tukur, the non-indigenes said that Okowa stood out as the only governor in the state whose developmental strides were outstanding, adding that his love for the state and the people dated back to periods before governorship.

    According to Auwalu, when Okowa was commissioner and later Secretary to the State Government, he championed adult education for non-indigenes, and ensured that members of the community were part of government, with no fewer than five Special Assistants to the Governor then.

    “When you went to the Senate, we can recall with relish the powerful empowerments you gave to us; you empowered many of us, and some of our children got Federal Government jobs.

    “By God’s grace, you became Governor of Delta State in 2015, and you did very well because everybody was calling you “Road Master” and also had hospitals everywhere.

    “That was when you made the first Hausa man the Chairman of Delta State Muslims Pilgrims Welfare Board, and many of us you are seeing here were SAs and SSAs during your tenure.

    “We have come to tell you that we are with you through our daily prayers and we will continue to be with you till the end of time because you have carried us along and you have shown us the way and empowered us and we will continue to be grateful.

    “Those trying to give you a bad name will not succeed by the grace of God, and on this note, we pass a vote of confidence on you,” he said.

    Responding, Okowa thanked the non-indigenes for their support over the years, assuring that he would continue to champion their course in any way he could.

    According to him, many of you were born here, and many of you have lived here and raised your families and businesses here.

    “This is why in any position i have occupied in government i have always advocated that you should be recognised because you have lived here, your home is here, your business and your children are here, so there is no reason why you should not be treated as indigenes of Delta State.

    “Recognition in this context shouldn’t just be about appointments but for the fact that you have lived here with your families for a long time you should be seen as a Deltans and I thank God that you are gradually being recognised.

    “Most of you have party positions, and we have Igbo and Arewa Councillors, and I am happy that you are beginning to have that recognition.

    “I urge you to continue to see Delta State as your home because when you do that, we will continue to have peace and development,” he said.

    On EFCC invitation, the former governor said “the most important thing is that I am not afraid of the accusations. Let the investigation go on because the amount of N1.3 trillion they are mentioning is frightening.

    “You all know how Asaba and Okpanam were in 2015 and you know how it is now. We constructed many roads and built storm water drainages to prevent flooding.

    “You know many leaders would prefer to build infrastructure that will be seen like roads, flyovers, and many others, but if you build that and there is no road to pass due to flooding, it’s useless.

    “You know it was always a nightmare when it rained then in Asaba and Okpanam, but it took visionary leadership to carry out such storm water drains because you are burying money on the ground.

    “We started similar storm drainages in Warri and I am glad that the current governor is continuing with it, and it takes boldness to do those things.”

    He stated that his administration left several legacy projects across the state and commended Governor Sheriff Oborevwori for continuing and ensuring the completion of many of them.

    “Professor Chike Edozien State Secretariat we built won ‘he most iconic public building in Nigeria’ and it was designed by a Deltan, Arch Kester Ifeadi.

    “Workers now work there from morning till night, and you all can also recall the state of the Mariam Babangida Road, and the three universities we established now have no fewer than 33,000 students on admission.

    “We worked for the people, and I am glad that the people saw what we did even in riverside communities in the state.

    “Through DESOPADEC, we rebuilt Oboghoro and Utonlila communities in Warri North, and we were constructing the bridge to Orere and other communities in Ewu Kingdom, over 500 meters length.

    “During my tenure, we built five more bridges on the Trans-Warri-Ode-Itsekiri roads and bridges and I am glad that Governor Oborevwori is about completing the project to enable our Itsekiri brothers drive straight to Ode-Itsekiri.” Okowa added.

  • Court rejects EFCC’s move to arraign Yahaya Bello without his lawyer

    Court rejects EFCC’s move to arraign Yahaya Bello without his lawyer

    A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, turned down the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)’s application to arraign ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi in the absence of his lawyers.

    Justuce Emeka Nwite while delivering a ruling on the oral application by the EFCC’s counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, held that such request could not be granted in the interest of fair hearing.

    Justice Nwite agreed with Pinheiro that though a bench warrant was issued against the former governor, “fair hearing cannot be sacrificed on the altar of bench warrant.”

    The judge held that it was not in doubt that the matter was originally adjourned until Jan. 21, 2025, before the anti-graft agency brought a motion for the abridgement of time to arraign Bello.

    When the matter was called on Friday, although the former governor was in court, he was not represented by any lawyer.

    The judge then asked the EFCC’s counsel why the defendant was not represented in court. Pinheiro said the defendant would be in better position  to answer the question.

    However, when the ex-governor was asked why his lawyers were not in court, he said he was only informed of the sitting late Thursday night at about 11pm and so could not contact his lawyers. Pinheiro then made an application for the arraignment of Mr Bello.

    “What the law requires is the presence of the defendant, not the presence of his lawyers,” he argued, citing sections 271 and 396 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.

    “I respectfully apply that the charge be ready to this defendant and his plea be taken.Then this matter can be adjourned,” he said.

    But the judge said the instant case was peculiar.

    “It is peculiar in the sense that we have already agreed on a date, which is in January. It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel,” the Judge said.

    Pinheiro insisted that the defendant’s plea be taken, citing a previous case.

    According to him, I rely on the authority of Joseph Vs. State, 2014, to the effect that what the court requires for arraignment is the physical presence of the defendant and not the presence of his counsel.

    Delivering the ruling, Justice Nwite turned down Pinheiro’s application.

    “I have listened to the submission of counsel to the prosecution and also heard from the defendant.

    “It is not in dispute that on 30th of October, this matter came up. And it is not in dispute that the defendant was not in court.

    “It is also not in dispute  that the court ordered the parties to address the court on whether the defendant can be tried in absentia.

    “And it is also not in dispute that the matter has been adjourned till 21st day of January, 2024 for ruling.

    “It will be unfair if the matter is taken without the defendant’s  counsel. It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel. Therefore, I am of the view that the defendant’s counsel be put on notice,” he ruled.

    Justice Nwite consequently adjourned the matter until Dec. 13 for the hearing of the EFCC’s motion for the abridgement of time for the arraignment of the former governor.

    The judge, who ordered that the hearing notice be issued and be served on the defendant’s lawyers, directed that the ex-governor should remain in the anti-graft agency’s custody pending the adjourned date.

  • Alleged cybercrime: 109 foreigners admitted to N1bn bail

    Alleged cybercrime: 109 foreigners admitted to N1bn bail

    A Federal High Court in Abuja  on Friday, admitted at least 109 foreigners, charged over allegations bordering on cybercrime, to a N1 billion bail with fiver suites.

    Justice Ekerete Akpan, who granted them bail, directed that the five sureties must have a landed property worth N200, 000 million each.

    Justice Akpan directed that the sureties must deposit the original and verified documents of their landed property with the deputy registrar of the court.

    The judge, who also directed the sureties to deposit their international passports, ordered the defendants to be remanded in Keffi Correctional Centre in Nasarawa State pending the perfection of their bail terms.

    He adjourned the matter until Feb. 27, 2025 for trial.

    The foreigners, who are said to be citizens of China, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand, Brazil, Malaysia and Myanmar, were recently arrested by the police.

    They were apprehended in their residence at Plot 1906, Cadestral Zone 807, Katampe District of Abuja, where they were said to be engaging in cybercrime by allegedly promoting “a fraudulent and unregistered gaming platform.”

    In a six-count charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/599/2024 filed in the name of the Inspector-General (I-G) of Police, the foreigners were charged with cybercrime, money laundering and unlawfully residing in Nigeria.

    In one of the counts, they were alleged to have aided, abetted, conspired among themselves “to commit an offence, to wit; cybercrime.”

    They were said to have commited the offence contrary to and punishable under Section 27 (1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc) Act, 2015 (As Amended, 2024).

    They were also alleged to have accessed a computer, network and input with the intention that such inauthentic data will be considered or acted upon as If they were authentic or genuine.”

    The offence is said to be contrary to and punishable under Section 13 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc) Act, 2015 (As Amended, 2024).”

    Again, they were alleged to have  removed “from Nigeria proceeds generated from operating a fraudulent and unregistered gambling platforms.

    “These platforms are  9f.com, c2.top, 8pg.top and you thereby commit money laundering, contrary to and punishable under Section 18 of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”

    The defendants were also accused of entering “the territory of the Federal Republic of Nigeria with a business permit of 30 days duration and failed to leave the Nigerian territory at the expiration of the said permit.

    The offence is contrary to Section 4 (2) and punishable under Section 44 (1) (c) of the Immigration Act 2015.”