Tag: Electoral Act 2022

  • NASS welcome moves to amend Electoral Act 2022 – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    NASS welcome moves to amend Electoral Act 2022 – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    Many Nigerians agreed – and had hoped – that the amended Electoral Act 2022 would be a game changer in terms of its dynamism and innovation to cure obvious lapses in the electoral system, and ensure credibility and transparency of elections.

    But as shown in the process, outcome and aftermath of the February-March 2023 General Election conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), a lot of loopholes and wiggle room still exist in the system.

    Trust politicians, they’ve exploited these flaws for selfish ends. Even those that’d long shot – or no shot at all – at the offices they vied for, have taken undue advantage of the inadequacies in the electoral law to blame their opponents – and not themselves – for their defeats at the poll.

    Particularly excoriated are INEC and the All Progressives Congress (APC) for alleged connivance – that’s largely unproven in courts when the accusers were given opportunities to do so – to deny members of the opposition the reported mandate Nigerians gave to them on poll day.

    Hence the refrain, “We will retrieve our ‘stolen mandate’ in court,” which they failed to achieve, as the courts dismissed most petitions and/or appeals as “incompetent and lacking in merit” – judgments that’ve given rise to further allegations of compromise of Judges handling electoral matters.

    No court – from the High Court to the Supreme Court – is spared these odious allegations bandied by defeated candidates, their cronies, supporters and political parties because there’re no sanctions – and if there’re, no one has been held to account – for such spurious charges against political opponents, the governing party, Judges and the entire Judiciary.

    To the extent that lately, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, was hard-pressed to urge Judges not to abandon the law for “emotions of the mob” in the consideration of matters before them.

    At the swearing-in of 58 new Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) in Abuja, Justice Ariwoola said: “I expect every judicial officer to work very hard and also be very honest and courteous to the litigants, witnesses and members of the bar, and discharge all your judicial functions with all the humility at your command.

    “Even while doing this, it is still necessary to have at the back of your minds that public opinions, sentiments or emotions can never take the place of the law in deciding the cases that come before you.

    “The law remains the law, no matter whose interest is involved. In all we do, as interpreters of the law, we should endeavour to severe the strings of emotion from logic and assumption from fact.

    “We should never be overwhelmed by the actions or loud voices of the mob or crowd and now begin to confuse law with sentiment or something else in deciding our cases.”

    Nonetheless, the moves by the National Assembly (NASS) to review the Electoral Act – soon after the courts have put to rest the virulently-contentious February 25 presidential poll – should appease those aggrieved over the fallouts from the elections.

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Sharafadeen Alli, on Channels TV’s Sunrise Daily on November 21, hinted about the Senate musing on extensive review of the Electoral Act 2022.

    Senator Alli (APC, Oyo South) – affirming that the 2022 Act was a game changer, and yet, not a perfect legislation – listed some areas (for amendments) that drew the ire of the electorate during the 2023 elections.

    They include, mandatory conclusion of pre and post-election matters before inauguration of election winners; binding electronic transmission, and upload of results to the INEC Results Viewing (IReV) portal realtime; and conclusion of petitions and appeals before swearing-in of poll winners.

    He said: “I must say this, there can not be a perfect legislation. After every legislation, you see gaps and that is when power that is given to the judiciary will tap into this clause.

    “We must praise the 9th (National) Assembly under Senator (Ahmad) Lawan (former Senate President) for coming out boldly to pass the Electoral Act; it is the fundamental change in our electoral system.

    “BVAS (Biomodal Voter Accreditation System) machine is like a game changer, unlike the Card Reader. When the card reader does not work, we will fill the incident form, and we knew (what voters) used that for. But as soon as you bypass the BVAS this time around, the election is null and void. That is one of the things that we are doing going forward.

    “And whatever we say on every legislation, there has been an improvement on the previous ones, and we say things are getting better (even if) there are errors there as well.

    “Under the current law, it is not mandatory for INEC to upload (poll results). That is what the courts have said: ‘Enter the law.’

    “But as we are going forward, it (upload of results) is going to be mandatory. It is just to ask INEC to make sure we improve our technology and ensure that the thing is there.”

    The Senate, in its retreat in Akwa Ibom State in October – which precursored the Lagos retreat by the Joint Committee of the National Assembly on Electoral Matters – set up a committee to attend to electoral reforms in advance of the 2027 polls.

    Rising from the three-day Lagos parley, the committee – which demonstrated the seriousness of observed lapses in the Electoral Act, and the importance of remedying them for the 2027 electons – resolved to pursue and conclude the amendments before the end of 2024.

    In the course of its deliberations, the committee took cognisance of, and reviewed recommendations from local and international election observers, who elaborated on citizens’ experiences with the 2023 elections.

    Areas for amendments include: * The challenge of appointment of non-partisan persons into INEC that hinders its independence and integrity. * Issue of minimum educational qualification of candidates for elective offices. * Conflicts arising from decisions of the courts over pre or post-election matters.

    Others are: * The use of BVAS technology in electoral process. * INEC’s recourse to reconfiguring the BVAS machines (wiping prior data) before fresh election. * Lack of clarity in documentary proof of non-compliance with the electoral law. * Operational challenges in INEC as per electoral offences. * Issue of internal democracy that splinters parties, and breeds anti-party activities.

    To success in its task, the Joint Committee will carry out extensive consultations with constituents, the public, and other stakeholders, to ensure inclusive participation; collaborate with the NASS Constitutional Review Committee, to address areas of elections that require alteration to the amended 1999 Constitution; and work with technical experts to prioritise and articulate issues for amendment.

    The NASS leadership has given the assurance for a timely amendment of the Electoral Act, to enhance transparency and accountability in the electoral processes.
    The November 29 commitment comes in Abuja at a “Citizens’ Townhall on Electoral Reform,” organised by Yiaga Africa in collaboration with the Senate and House of Representatives Joint Committee on Electoral Matters.

    Senate President Godswill Akpabio said: “For the electoral process, we are committed not only to go along with the people on the call for reforms on electoral framework, but at the same time protect the independence of the electoral commission and restore the trust of the people in the electoral process.
    “This administration is ready to work with anyone and everyone that is interested in the progress and development of this nation. This is not only on issues on electoral reform, but also in formulating initiatives and policies that will revamp our economy and put us on the driving seat of industrial and economic advancement.”

    Similarly, House of Representatives Speaker Tejudeen Abbas said: “There is no gainsaying the fact that credible elections are the bedrock of any democracy, and Nigeria stands the risk of reversing the gains of the last two decades if we do not fix our elections.

    “The 10th House of Representatives is committed to championing legislative initiatives that promote fairness, transparency and accountability in our electoral processes.”

    Critics, who, in the wake of the 2023 elections, shredded the entire Electoral Act 2022, have the opportunity now to contribute their quota to making the law a “perfect” one of their dream.

    This is as Nigerians, and the global community look forward to the NASS, to translate its zeal, commitment, and timely commencement of reforming the electoral process into enhancing credibility and acceptability of our elections.

  • PDP confident in Supreme Court for election appeal

    PDP confident in Supreme Court for election appeal

    The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) has expressed confidence in the Supreme Court to deliver justice as it commences the hearing of the 2023 Presidential Election Appeal today.
    In a press statement, the National Publicity Secretary of the party, Debo Ologunagba, conveyed the party’s belief that the issues surrounding the February 2023 Presidential election will be granted a fair hearing through the Supreme Court.
    “Nigerians and indeed the whole world look forward to the Supreme Court for justice in the hope that the Court will apply the laws, including the express provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), the Electoral Act, 2022 and INEC Guidelines and Regulations in delivering substantial justice in the matter.
    “Nigerians are therefore optimistic in hoping that the Supreme Court will dispense substantial Justice according to law and fact in the Appeal,” the PDP spokesperson said.
    Ologunagba further expressed hope that the Supreme Court will use the PDP’s case to reaffirm the principle that the Judiciary is the ultimate refuge for the common man.

  • INEC has no power to void, nullify election results – Senator

    INEC has no power to void, nullify election results – Senator

    A Senator under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) representing the Adamawa North Senatorial District Ishaku Abbo, has reiterated that according to the Electoral Act as amended in 2022, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) does not have the power to nullify or invalidate an already declared result from an election.

    Abbo stated this during a Channels Television programme, Sunrise Daily, on Monday, a day after INEC suspended the collation of the Adamawa State supplementary governorship poll despite results declared for 10 of 20 local government areas (LGAs).

    “INEC cannot nullify an election that has been announced, they don’t have that power. Elections have been announced, it is out of their hands,” the Senator said.

    His words reechoed those of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kelvin Nwofo, who affirmed that only the election petition tribunal is empowered to cancel already declared results.

    Nwofo added that any grievance in the electoral process during the collation stage can only be addressed by a regular court and not a tribunal because tribunals are activated only when results are declared.

    “The settled position of the law is that INEC does not have any powers to cancel already declared results even if there are valid cases of irregularities.

    “This is because it has been held in ABANA vs. OBI (2004) and in a plethora of cases, that once the result has been declared, a winner announced and Form EC8E issued, it is only the tribunal and not INEC that has the legal right to cancel or nullify the declaration,” the senior lawyer said citing Section 68 of the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended).

    The section reads: “The decision of the returning officer on any question arising from or relating to – (a) unmarked ballot paper; (b) rejected ballot paper; and (c) declaration of scores of candidates and the return of a candidate, shall be final subject to review by a tribunal or court in an election petition proceedings under this Act.”

    Additionally, Section 149 states: “Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act, any defect or error arising from any actions taken by an official of the Commission in relation to any notice, form, or document made or given or other things done by the official in pursuance of the provisions of the Constitution or of this Act, or any rules made thereunder remain valid, unless otherwise challenged and declared invalid by a competent court of law or tribunal”.

  • National Assembly will amend Electoral Act – Lawan

    Senate President Ahmad Lawan has stated that the red chamber will try to amend the electoral act in order to work on the weaknesses in it.

    Lawan made this known  during plenary on Tuesday afternoon , following a matter of National importance brought by Sen. Yahaya Abdullahi (PDP-Kebbi)

    The Yobe born politician  described the judgment by the Supreme Court on Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act as a landmark judgment that vindicates the National Assembly.

    He said further amendment of the Act would strengthen it ahead of the 2023 general elections.

    “Let me say that this is one major landmark judgment by the Supreme Court, that the National Assembly had done their job and the court upheld it.

    “The idea of what method of primaries should be adopted at the moment is entirely left for the political parties to decide.

    “But as we implement the electoral act 2022, we are supposed to be very observant of the strengths and weaknesses of the law.

    “This law is supposed to improve on the electoral processes and procedures in our country.

    “So, it is for us to ensure that where there are weaknesses, we try to come up with measures, amendments to deal with the issues of weaknesses in the law.

    “And, I’m sure it will come full circle when the 2023 elections are held.

    “I have no doubt in my mind that all of us in the National Assembly, not only in the Senate, but in the House as well, feel that we must do everything and everything possible to make this electoral act serve the purpose for which it was passed and assented to.

    “Therefore, I believe that we should work tirelessly to take note of those areas that we feel are not strong enough – that are weak points in the law – with a view to strengthening them before we finally take our exit in 2023,” he said.

    Rising under Order 42 of the Senate Standing Orders, Abdullahi in his presentation lauded the Ninth Assembly for resisting the pressure from the executive to amend section 84(12) of Electoral Act 2022.

    He applauded the Supreme Court for the clarity, decisiveness and unanimity of its verdict in upholding the separation of powers principle enshrined in our 1999 constitution.

    He said the Supreme Court verdict was a major victory towards true democratic governance anchored on the rule of law.

    “In my view, the Supreme Court verdict should be celebrated for the following reasons.

    “It restored and anchors the power of making laws to the National Assembly, and establishes a principle that once the President accents to a Bill he/she can’t approbate and reprobate, i.e. he/she cannot go to the courts to amend/reject the Bill in part or in whole”, he said.

    Abdullahi, however, emphasised the need to amend the electoral act to revert to the Direct mode of primaries.

    “One issue still remains outstanding, and that is amending the Act (after the 2023 elections) to revert to our earlier stance on Direct primaries.

    “Our recent nasty experience of the misuse of consensus and delegate system has vindicated our earlier position on the merit of direct primaries provided that a verifiable membership register of political parties kept simultaneously at the Ward level and with INEC with all the necessary safeguards against corruption and data manipulation, is put in place.

    “As the political process towards 2023 unfolds, the National Assembly needs to be observant of the loopholes and weaknesses of the 2022 Electoral Act.

    “So that a comprehensive assessment is undertaken to provide adequate grounds for making amendments to the Act before the end of the term of office of the ninth Assembly in May 2023”, he said.

  • 2023: Akpabio says Electoral law doesn’t ask appointees to resign

    2023: Akpabio says Electoral law doesn’t ask appointees to resign

    The debate on the provisions of section 84, subsection 12 of electoral act 2022 has continued with the Minister of Niger Delta Affairs and presidential aspirant, Godswill Akpabio, declaring that the section doesn’t say appointees should resign.

    He stated this while appearing on Channels TV’s Politics Today on Thursday.

    The Minster stressed that the section was nonexistent as a court in Abia had rendered it unconstitutional.

    Thenewsguru.com recalls that the section says; “No political appointee at any level shall be a voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”

    Akpabio however said; “In terms of section 84(12), it speaks about elections. If you wish to go into primary, you should try to resign before you go there.

    In his words; “Even before Mr. President signed the bill, he had mentioned that it was not in line with the Nigerian constitution which contemplates 30 days before elections.”

    ALSO READ: Electoral Act: Only Appeal Court can upturn judgment on Section 84(12) – Malami

    2023: Why I joined presidential race – Akpabio

    According to the Minister, no matter the act of parliament, no matter the law, the constitution is superior, adding, “Noreover, it was shut down by a court of competent jurisdiction somewhere in Umuahia. So for now, that law doesn’t exist.”

    He stated that he wasn’t worried about the law because the constitution superceded it.

    “I would have been worried about how the appeal would go but for the constitution. It depends on the constitution at the end of the day. It’s not a constitutional amendment,” Akpabio started.

    Recall thenewsguru.ng reported here that opposition groups and some political commentators have raised concerns about the decision of many within the federal cabinet to retain their positions despite actively canvassing for support in 2023 general election.

  • Rivers Federal lawmakers advises Buhari not to pressure judicial process over electoral act

    Rivers Federal lawmakers advises Buhari not to pressure judicial process over electoral act

    A member of the National Assembly, Dumnamene Dekor, has called on the President Muhammad Buhari not pressure the judiciary over the interpretation of the Electoral Act.
    His advised is on the heels of what is contained in section 84 and subsection 12 as well as 13.
    The lawmaker said such an attempt would be tantamount to a breach of the role of the Judiciary as an arm of government.
    Dekor, who represents the Khana/Gokana Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, made the call while answering questions from journalists in Port-Harcourt on Tuesday.

    Also Read: President Buhari sued over Nigerians hardship during fuel scarcity
    The legislator stated that it was wrong for government appointees to remain in office while declaring their intent to contest various elective positions in the 2023 general election.
    He explained that although the National Assembly had already appealed the ruling of the March 18 Federal High Court in Umuahia to the effect that the Electoral Act was contrary to the 1999 constitution, section 84 of the Electoral Act was a well-thought constituent

    Also Read:Electoral Act: Only Appeal Court can upturn judgment on Section 84(12) – Malami
    In his own words; “Those in public offices will take undue advantage of those who are also in the race. For instance, if you are an aide to a governor or president, or any elected official, you should not remain in office until you resign.
    “If I am a commissioner or minister, for instance, and I am running for the House of Assembly, then it means that I will use the influence or advantage of my office to edge out whoever is contesting against me.
    “The National Assembly took a lot of things into consideration. We are still on it. The National Assembly is already in the court to appeal the matter,” he stated.
    Recently, the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), and the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN), had argued that section 84 of the Act “prejudices and impedes the constitutional rights of most Nigerians to participate in the electoral processes or primaries of their political parties.
    But Dekor objected, saying the President has no power whatsoever to interpret the law.
    According to him, “President Buhari has no such powers. He cannot arrogate judicial powers to himself. Mr. President has no such powers, with all sense of respect.
    “Laws are made to be interpreted by the judiciary. He has no such role in interpreting the laws because he is the head of the executive and head of government.
    “He cannot interpret a law that has already been passed and which he had assented only to turn around to say that the electoral act is a breach of the constitution.
    “Those who advise him should look at the Act deeply before giving him such advice. The President was ill-advised,” he concluded.