Tag: Electricity

  • BREAKING: National Grid collapses again

    BREAKING: National Grid collapses again

    The National Grid, being operated by the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) has suffered yet another collapse, throwing the entire country into total darkness.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports this will be the 5th time the National Grid will collapse in 2024 under Adebayo Adelabu as the Minister of Power.

    This is coming barely a week after the controversial review of Band A electricity tariff by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC).

    According to data obtained from www.niggrid.org, the Nigerian System Operator’s portal, as reported by Business Day, the grid collapsed at about 2:00 am.

    The grid recorded an unprecedented zero Megawatts (MW) at the time and is currently generating a meagre 52.3MW around 7:10 am today.

    The consequences of this blackout were felt nationwide, as electricity distribution companies (DisCos) struggled to cope with the sudden and prolonged outage.

    Many parts of the country have been plunged into darkness for over five hours as the grid is yet to come into full recovery.

    This collapse marks the fifth grid disturbance in 2024, adding to challenges that have long plagued Nigeria’s power sector.

    In a year already marred by disruptions, this latest incident stands out as the most severe, exacerbating the ongoing struggles consumers and industry stakeholders face.

    Despite the widespread impact of the blackout, neither the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) nor the DisCos have yet to issue an official statement regarding the cause and resolution of the crisis.

    As of the time this report was filed, the TCN had not stated to confirm the occurrence, leaving the public and stakeholders in the dark about the source and resolution of the newest crisis.

  • A tax on darkness – By Chidi Amuta

    A tax on darkness – By Chidi Amuta

    On the technical matters of electricity supply and consumption rates, I am just a layman. I fare even worse when it comes to engaging professional technocrats and technicians on the arithmetic of pricing public goods and services. On goods that ought to be available to all of us at least cost to make life better and more livable, I do not break my head over the minutiae of megawatts and kilowatts. I just do not know how they calculate power supply, consumption, pricing and the like. But I know a few things that matter about electricity and public goods and social services in general. I know how long it takes for the ambulance to arrive in an emergency. I know how long it takes to beg and pour libations for the police response squad to show up when people are in distress.

    When I arrive a country, within the first day I make up my mind whether the power system works or not. If hotel power goes off and on every other hour, I nod with familiarity . If I enter a room and flip the switch, I know when there is electricity supply. When driving through a neighborhood, I know when everywhere is in pitch darkness. I prepare psychologically for the evils that hide in the dark. When I get home at the end of the day’s grind, it is no longer a surprise if the house is on generator or in pitch darkness. Whether under politicians in mufti or the ones in army fatigue, Nigerians have come to know our public electricity system as a metaphor for all the ailed promises of our lives since after 1960. Children learn to cope with disappointment each time they are playing or watching television and darkness descends everywhere; they shout in a mixture of suppressed disappointment and predictable certainty.

    In dealing with our governments over the last few decades, I have also come to master the antics of political tricksters and the fraud that often goes in the name of government services in these parts. The grandiose promises. The ceremonial tapes cut to inaugurate phantom projects and programmes that were designed to fail from day one. The mathematics of fraudulent reforms and the bare faced robbery of those who insist that nothing in a republic was meant to be free of charge in the first place. The massive gifts of betrayal in return for votes cast in defiance of rain and sun!

    It has become more frequent in recent times. To greet Nigerians for the sacrifice of Lent and the rugged self -denial of the Ramadan weeks of passion, the Tinubu government casually announced a stratospheric  increase in electricity tariffs. There was no dress rehearsal. No previous warning. No enlightenment to psychologically prepare the populace for yet another unplanned tax. The electricity tariff increase was announced in typical military ambush fashion. The new tax on electricity would seem to have come from the same package as the earlier petroleum subsidy removal and currency devaluation. Just a casual bloodless announcement by a government that speaks as though it operates from outer space. No feelings. No compassion. No regard for the sensitivities of those whom their policies have left stranded and wounded. So much hurt on the same people in only one year or less.

    Since the tariff increase, the electricity regulatory authority (NERC) and other government bull horns have dominated the air waves with senseless propaganda. A cacophony of confusing statistics, disarticulated figures and mangled arguments have been advanced to justify what is clearly a tax on our disgraceful electricity  supply system or the prolonged darkness that it has foisted on our people for endless years.

    By their revelation, only a miserable 13 million Nigerians out of our estimated 230 million have access to electricity.  Of this number, less than 2 million consumers enjoy up to 20 hours of power supply in a day. In the entire nation, only a consistent less than 4,500 Megawatts of electricity is available from hydro, gas and thermal stations whenever they work. Compared to other nations of equivalent rank,  Nigerian’s total electricity supply figures have remained almost static with a national grip that collapses nearly once every week. South Africa produces 58,095 Megawatts. Egypt produces 16,900 Megawatts, Ghana reached 23,963 Megawatts in 2023. In comparison,  Nigeria lives in virtual darkness as far as electricity suppy is concerned. Yet it is this perpetual darkness that is now being taxed to high heavens.

    The logic of the new tariff increases is even more atrocious. Under the new regime, Nigerian electricity consumers have now been grouped into Bands. Those on Band A are consumers who have been accused of enjoying up to 20 hours or more of electricity per day. This class of privileged consumers is estimated to be only a miserable 1.5 million consumers. They have had their tariffs increased by 300%. By this curious logic, consumers on other bands would with time have their tariffs increased by a graduated scale in due course. But for now, only 1.5 million consumers will bear the burden of the tariff increases and therefore pay for the maintenance of power installations, fund the cost of new investment and keep the national power sector alive.It is this stratospheric increase that will make the electricity sector attractive for new investors, pay for supply to consumers in other consumer bands, extend electricity supply to the rural areas,  maintain the various gas and hydro electric facilities etc.

    Part of the so called strategic calculation of the government thinkers is that those under Band A are too comfy and rich to disturb the peaceof government through protests, loud complaints and acts of civil disobedience. For now the more troublesome masses in Bands C, D, E  etc are temporarily insulated from any tariff increases. Their rich compatriots will pay for them. By the crude propaganda of the NERC and the government megaphones, once the new tariff comes into effect, there will be constant electricity, no more load shedding, no further national grid collapses etc.

    In terms of implementation, the entire thing was smuggled in quickly under cover of Easter and Sallah celebrations. Its immediate victims were carefully My friends who live in Band A areas enjoying nearly 20 hours  of power daily tellme they used to spend an average of N10,000 daily on electricity. Since after the draconian increase, they tell me they now spend between N35,000 and N40,000 daily on electricity. Much of what they get as power supply is half current. They are still visited with unannounced periodic power outages and load shedding at the discretion of the local distribution companies who are accountable to no one in particular.

    This Band A palaver does not end with the individual elite consumers. If the parameter is the number of hours of electricity enjoyed by a consumer, then bigger trouble is in the pipeline. Major hospitals (public and private) whose life support equipment are hooked onto electricity are in this band. Major hotels, factories, malls, airports and other public places may find themselves in this band. They now need to increase their service charges in order to pay for the new tariff. Even the National Assembly is under Band A and  its spoilt occupants cannot spend a minute in session except in air conditioned comfort!

    Official response  to the untold hardship of the new tariffs has displayed the trade mark insensitivity of the Tinubu government. The Minister of Power has in fact accused Nigerians of being irrespeonsible in their power consumption habits. People leave their light bulbs on foer indefinite hours. Others leave their refrigerators and air conditioners on indefinitely.The minister has reportedly apologized for the insult but has never disowned the insulting utterances. Like the currency flotation and gasoline tax, the government has not been honest enough to own up that these policies and so called reforms are largely plagiarized prescriptions of the IMF and World Bank. Regime trumpets are too busy  singing the praise of the reforming zeal of Mr. Tinubu to own up to the crass thoughtlessness of these so called reforms. Even worse is the lawlessness of the reforms like the electricity tariff increases.

    My brother and friend, Femi Falana, has screamed in disbelief that this electricity tariff gambit is mostly illegal. In the applicable NERC law, there is provision for an early warning, a mass public enlightenment campaign, public hearings across the nation, as well as National Assembly debates and ratification of the proposed tariff regime that would precede a consensual increase in electricity tariffs if any. None of these requirements was met or adhered to. Just a casual insensitive announcement.

    What makes the electricity tariff increase problematic is the long standing reputation of our electricity system. Among the populace especially the urban and rural poor, our public electricity system has become synonymous with perennial darkness. Where there is power supply for a few hours, there are hardly any meters to measure what is being consumed. This has led to the fraud called ‘estimated bills’ under which officials of distribution companies inflict whatever draconian bills they decide on hapless consumers and negotiate payments into their pockets or the coffers of the vastly incompetent distribution companies with their armies of corrupt officials and dubious owners.

    While affected consumers struggle to pay the new tariffs through every part of their body to keep their homes lit and their businesses in session, the tariff increase has raised too many questions about the nation’s electricity sector. How will the 300% tarrif hike on a small segment of consumers (1.5 million) create the pool of resources needed to develop the power sector into a viable national  sector? How does this tariff increase inflicted on a minority elite alleviate the hardship of a whole nation?  What happens to electricity consumers in the other bands no yet covered by the progressive tariff increases?

    There are more serious issues of accountability and basic responsibility of government that have remained lingering over these years. Estimates of expenditure on the power sector between 1999 and 2010 indicates an expenditure of  over N4.7 trillion. Countless projects have been initiated and abandoned by all manner of foreign and local investors. Politicians have made many impressive speeches about their intention to end the reign of darkness if only to deepen the crisis. Some states have even tried to initiate power projects on their own only to auction off the infrastructure because they did no homework on the implications. In spite of this huge expenditure, vast areas of the country have no experience of what is called electricity. Our rural, suburban and inner cities are without electricity sometimes for upwards of 6-8 months in a year. In spite of the speeches and succession of regimes, Nigeria is still stuck with less than 5,000 Megawatts of electricity on a year-on-year basis. Our legacy after the huge expenditures is endless darkness.

    All manner of solutions have been implemented. Separate generation, transmission and distribution companies have been created and rolled out. Power distribution licenses have been issued to companies in different locations of the country. In most cases, these licenses were issued to companies owned and run by political crooks and virtual illiterates and sometimes outrightly bankrupt individuals who have resorted to massive bank loans to sustain their rickety operations.  The end result is the current state of scandalous inefficiency in the delivery of a service that ought to be the lifeblood of the nation.

    It is part of the fraudulent devaluation of language in the politics of the present day to refer to a heartless increase of tariffs on electricity as ‘reform’ of the power sector. Imposition of a huge tax on the nation’s long dark night is perhaps the best name for the present politics of insensitivity and lack of compassion.

  • Power Minister gives condition for electricity tariff to drop

    Power Minister gives condition for electricity tariff to drop

    Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu has said the Naira continuing to appreciate against the Dollar is the only condition for electricity tariff to drop in the country.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Adelabu to have said the government has about N1.8 trillion to pay in electricity subsidy this year 2024.

    The Minister of Power made these known when he featured as a guest on Channels Television’s Politics Today programme on Thursday.

    According to the Adelabu, the Federal Government is still paying subsidy on electricity despite the recent hike in tariff paid by Band A customers.

    He insisted that the Electricity Act, 2023 made provisions for the review of tariff twice a year.

    Adelabu said by cutting down the inefficiencies of some operators in the sector, couple with the gains by the naira against the dollar in the last few weeks, tariff paid by Nigerians should moderate positively.

    “The tariff is flexible and I can tell you that even if naira gains more and the exchange rate comes down below N1,000, it must positively affect the tariff and the tariff even for the Band A will come to down below the N225 kilowatt per hour that we are currently charging.

    “The fact that the tariff for Band A, which is 15% of the total consumers will increase by over 200%, does not necessarily translate into 200% increase in their electricity bill if power is properly managed in terms of consumption.

    “As it is today, looking at a total production, transmission and distribution cost, the Nigerian Government is bearing 67% percent of that cost before the increase in tariff for Band A customers. But when you look at generation cost, the Nigerian Government is paying 90% but in terms of total subsidy, it is about 67% of subsidy on the tariff.

    “Last year, it was about N720bn which was not fully funded, we have about N305bn carried into this year. If we retain tariff at the current level, the Nigerian Government will be needing about N2.9trn to subsidise electricity but with the increase for Band A customers, we are going to have a reduction of about N1.1trn. So, we are looking at about N1.8trn in subsidy,” the Minister said.

    The minister assured Band A customers of value for their money. He also assured Nigerians that consumers on other bands won’t be shortchanged by distribution companies as the regulators won’t hesitate to wield their big stick on any of such discos.

    He also said the government has shifted its attention on discos inefficiently ran and won’t hold back in taking the appropriate steps in the interest of consumers.

    The minister further said the government has been working on ramping up power generation from about 4,000 megawatts to 6,000 megawatts in the next six months. He said 25% of Nigeria’s power generation is from hydroelectric power while the remaining 75% is from gas plants.

    The minister said “the gas that is supposed to be the raw material has not been coming in adequate proportion” but the government has been working with electricity generation companies to ramp up power generated for the benefit of Nigerians.

    Recall that the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) had on April 3, 2024 raised electricity tariff for customers enjoying 20 hours power supply daily. Customers in this category are said to be under the Band A classification.

    The increase will see the customers paying N225 kilowatt per hour from the current N66, a development that has been heavily criticised by many Nigerians, considering the immediacy of the tariff hike and the current hardship in the land.

    Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, had said the increase in tariff paid by Band A consumers was illegal.

    “Review of tariff is actually legal once it is within the exclusive responsibility of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC). The Act actually provides for review twice in a year, every six months,” Adelabu said.

  • Electricity tariffs: The limits of shock – By Dakuku Peterside

    Electricity tariffs: The limits of shock – By Dakuku Peterside

    In Nigeria, many policies that are supposed to catalyse economic growth end up making things worse and complicate matters for the citizen for whom these policies are designed to enhance their quality of life. Recently, two significant policies typify this: The Petroleum Subsidy Removal Policy and the floating of the Naira. Both policies are good and well-intentioned and would bring about substantial progress for people in the medium to long term. However, the reality is that the policies ended up having a devastating effect on the populace. Removing the subsidy brought untold hardship due to sequencing and implementation issues rather than the principle of doing it. Somehow, we are still battling to survive the impact of the Naira forex rate merger.

    The problem was not the nobility of the intention, but something was wrong with these policies’ conception, delivery, and implementation. This is against the absence of a planned execution that appreciated the impact assessment of a singular action on the economic dynamics such that by solving one problem, we created a bigger one.

    The most recent 231% hike in the price of electricity units for Band A customers is another presumed good policy that might have an unintended adverse impact on the citizens. The main argument for a  cost reflective tariff must be distinct from that of subsidy removal, especially when the economics of the subsidy is yet to be proven, and the utilisation transition mechanism is not established or communicated. This policy may unleash hardship on the people, which is not the intention of the policymakers. To be clear, I  am an advocate  of cost reflective  electricity tariff because of the big picture, and I will give reasons for this, but I am afraid I have to disagree with the current government approach.

    Based on the evidence of the roll-out of the policy and the realities of this new electricity regime, it is unclear how the determination of the bands works because the criteria of customers enjoying the constant 20-hour power supply threshold are unsubstantiated and bogus. Moreso  for a largely illiterate population . This makes the case for tariff increase somewhat confusing and not transparent as there is no measurable way for the average consumer to track supply relative to billing. The result is that people may end up paying for darkness.

    A gradual, sequential step to the ultimate destination of appropriate electricity pricing would  have delivered   a different result and minimise the adverse effect on the citizens.  I have gone through the website of the regulator ,If  what the  Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has released  is the master plan for implementing appropriate electricity pricing, it  lacks  details of the progression path to total transition to cost effective tariff regime and fall short of expectations in every respect. The result of this hurried announcement of a price hike, whether for band A, B, or even C clients, may lead to endless inflation and economic stress on the citizens. If we add the electricity price hike to the impact of petrol subsidy removal and spiralling food inflation, the average citizen faces existential shock.

    However, I support the appropriate electricity pricing because it is critical for ensuring the sustainability, reliability, and affordability of electricity supply in Nigeria and promoting investment, innovation, and economic growth in the energy sector and beyond. Appropriate pricing ensures that utilities can generate sufficient revenue to invest in the maintenance, upgrade, and expansion of electricity infrastructure to enhance the reliability and quality of electricity supply. It incentivises consumers to use electricity more efficiently, thereby reducing energy consumption. It attracts private investment and, most importantly, helps reduce the financial burden on the government of subsidising electricity prices, freeing up resources for other priority areas such as health care, education, and infrastructural development. For the above reasons, I advocate appropriate pricing and support any policy that will open our electricity regime for growth and development. I understand the importance of electricity in Nigeria’s emerging economic structure.

    Nonetheless, I do not support the current policy approach because it is counterintuitive and counterproductive. It will produce a counter-effect to the intended goal. The reasons for my position are evident: first, between 1999 and 2015, Nigerian Senate documents show that Nigeria spent N2.74 trillion on electricity, yet there was no significant improvement in the generation or power delivered to homes and businesses. From 2018 to 2020, we spent N1.7 trillion on electricity, yet 43% of our population, according to the World Bank, needs to be connected to the national grid. The inference to draw is that the electricity power challenge is beyond money.

    There are obviously systemic inefficiencies and corruption that no one has bothered to address. Asking consumers to pay more will transfer the inefficiencies to the populace. Second, NERC says only 15% or 1.8m out of 12million  meterable customers  are under band A, which enjoys 20 hours of electricity per day, although  this may seem unrealistic. This band A must include factories, banks, telecom companies, hospitals, schools,  malls, commercial centres, and residential areas of high-net-worth individuals. This increase in tariffs will mean an increase in the cost of doing business by 231%.  Cost of school fees for private institutions will also go up by  a factor of 231%. The implication is that the businesses will transfer the cost to final consumers, mostly people experiencing poverty who are already undergoing a cost-of-living crisis. Third, this may dampen the real sector, and many businesses may close. Besides, demands for goods and services may drop. The competitiveness and profitability of Nigerian firms may be in jeopardy.

    The current approach will create inflationary pressures, reduce the competitiveness of businesses both locally and internationally, impact the household budget that is already battered by harsh economic realities, lead to business closures and resultant unemployment, negatively impact economic growth by constraining production and consumption, and ultimately may exacerbate already tensed social and civil unrest. Policymakers should consider implementing measures to improve electricity generation, transmission, and distribution efficiency and address issues related to tariff structures, affordability, and subsidy mechanisms.

    Nigeria has a vast informal sector – micro, small, and medium-sized businesses – that is our economy’s backbone. These businesses account for over 40% of our GDP and 70% of employment. These businesses include vibrant youth-led innovation hubs in informal urban settlements across the country, small service and creative firms scattered across our commercial centres, and burgeoning small industrial production businesses dotted in areas where access to electricity is better and stable. A draconian hike in electricity without appropriate time to plan and adjust may spell doom for these businesses, already spending a chunk of their merger revenue on private power generation.

    What could  NERC have been done differently  to implement a better pricing system? NERC could have delivered a well-thought-through transition plan over a 6-to-9-month period with a model allowing everyone to see what an increased tariff and electricity supply would mean. This way, citizens can adjust, make alternative arrangements and plan accordingly. Transparent communication and stakeholder engagement are essential for building  trust and effectively managing potential social and economic impacts. The necessity of public sensitisation on matters that affect the livelihood of the majority must be balanced. There is a need to prepare the public before implementing any new policy that has a significant impact on livelihoods. Socio-economic reform must never be an ambush shock therapy; otherwise, the populace will react like an injured collective. NERC ought to match an electricity tariff adjustment plan with a post-reform plan to show how the government and stakeholders intend to mitigate the adverse impact of a hike in price and other critical reforms.

    Conceptualising and adopting sound economic policies is necessary for increased output in the electricity sector, but more is needed: any policy is only as good as its implementation and impact. Policy implementation can fail for three reasons: the absence of complementary measures necessary to make the policy effective, nonalignment with reality, and the inadequate capability of prevailing institutions and administrative systems to respond to changes. This electricity tariff hike, especially given our current socio-economic realities, is one policy that may hurt the people because of poor conception and disoriented implementation. Though a great idea, the timing, implementation approach and lack of complementarity of favourable institutional and economic capacity to mitigate the unintended effect of the hike in price may end up creating more significant problems than we already have. Inadvertently, we may be biting more than we can chew.

  • New tariff: Discos get April 11 deadline to refund customers wrongly billed

    New tariff: Discos get April 11 deadline to refund customers wrongly billed

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has given 11 electricity distribution companies till April 11, 2024, to refund customers wrongly billed at the new rate.

    This was contained in a document signed by Mr Abba Terab, the DGM, Market Competition and Rates for the commission and made available on Saturday in Lagos.

    The refund, NERC said, should be through energy tokens no later than April 11, and file evidence of compliance with the Commission by April 12.

    It also directed all Electricity Distribution Companies to provide as much clarity as possible to all affected customers.

    The DisCos are hereby directed to implement the following updates;

    1. All DisCos shall ensure that only the newly approved Band A feeders listed in their April 2024 supplementary orders are maintained as band A for the purpose of vending to prepaid customers and billing for post paid customers on their networks.

    2. All DisCos are required to immediately post on their websites the schedule of approved Band A feeders that have been affected by the rate review.

    3. All DisCos shall set up a portal by 10th April 2024 on their website that allows all customers to check their current Bands by entering their meter or account numbers.

    4. All customers wrongly billed at the new rate should be refunded through energy tokens no later than Thursday 11th April 2024, and file evidence of compliance with the Commission by 12th April 2024.

    5. The Commission shall monitor compliance with the requirements listed above and shall continue to provide support to all stakeholders as required.” the document said.

  • FG ‘ll continue to subsidise electricity – Minister

    FG ‘ll continue to subsidise electricity – Minister

    The Minister of Power, Mr Adebayo Adelabu, says the Federal Government will continue to subsidise electricity for Nigerians ,to guarantee stable and reliable supply.

    Adelabu said this at the Ministerial Press Briefing Series organised by the Ministry of Information and National Orientation on Friday in Abuja.

    He said that the recent increase in tariff affected only a small  percentage  of the country’s  population ,adding that majority of  Nigerians would continue to enjoy government’s  subsidy.

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC)  had announced   an increase in electricity tariff paid by Band A customers from N68/KWh to N225KWh.

    NAN also reports that Band A  customers are those who enjoy electricity supply for 20 hours per day.

    ‘”From the latest statistics, we have about 12 million customers in the sector and this (tariff increase)will only affect  about 1.5 million customers.

    ”The remaining 10 .5 million customers will continue to enjoy government’s subsidy ,which  is almost   70 per cent  of the population

    ”This review is in conformity with our policy thrust of maintaining a subsidised pricing regime in the short run or in the short term with a transition plan to achieving a full cost reflective tariff for the sector over a period of three years,”he said.

    The minister said that before the tariff  increase ,government was subsidising  the cost of producing and transmitting electricity in the country by more than 50 per cent.

    Adelabu said the government decided not to migrate to a cost reflective tariff or remove subsidy 100 per cent because it was sensitive to the pains being experienced by Nigerians presently.

    He said removal of subsidy would be a journey rather than destination and that  it would be a gradual migration from subsidy regime to a full cost reflective tariff regime.

  • BREAKING: NERC slams N200m fine on AEDC over unfair billing after electricity tariff hike

    BREAKING: NERC slams N200m fine on AEDC over unfair billing after electricity tariff hike

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has slammed a N200 million fine on the Abuja Electricity Distribution (AEDC) over unfair billing after the recent electricity tariff hike.

    Recall that NERC had on Wednesday hike tariff from N68/kWh to N225/kWh for electricity consumers in Band A, who enjoy power supply for an average of 20 hours daily.

    However, AEDC owned up to having wrongly billed customers who tried to recharge their metres following the new tariff regime.

    The Management of AEDC subsequently tendered an apology for the unfair billing in a notice to its customers in Abuja on Thursday.

    In trying to explain the unfair billing AEDC stated: ”This is to inform customers across the AEDC franchise that we are aware of the wrong charges faced by some Band A customers who tried to recharge their metres following the new tariff regime.

    “This is due to a system glitch caused by the reclassification of some Band A customers who have now been downgraded to B due to the number of hours of electricity supply enjoyed over the past few weeks.

    “These erstwhile Band A customers who vended were charged the new tariff of N225 per Kilowatt Hour. Our team is working to identify the customers affected and all excess charges will be refunded”.

    According to AEDC, the situation also saw some Band A customers who are now charged N225 vend at the old rate.

    The company said that once the glitch is resolved, these categories of customers would now recharge their metres at the new rate of N225, which will ensure they enjoy a minimum supply of 20 hours daily.

    “We apologise for any inconvenience caused to our customers during this change.

    “We remain committed to improving the power supply to all categories of customers, and we crave your understanding and support as we do this, ‘’ it said.

    However, NERC would not accept the explanation of AEDC, having fined the electricity distributor N200 million for failure to comply with the prescribed customer band classifications for the tariff billing.

    In a statement issued by the NERC management in Abuja on Friday, the commission stressed AEDC was fined for non-compliance with the Supplementary Order to the April 2024 Multi-Year Tariff Order 2024 for the company.

    NERC said that AEDC will pay the N200 million as a fine for the flagrant breach of the commission’s order.

    According to the NERC, the decision follows a detailed review and customer feedback, which revealed that AEDC had applied the new tariff to all customer bands, contrary to the order, which was designed to ensure fair billing practices.

    ”AEDC is therefore mandated to: reimburse all customers in Bands B, C, D and E respectively that were billed above the allowed customer categories/tariff bands provided in the order.

    ”Reimburse through the provision of the balance of customer tokens that the affected customers would be entitled to receive at the applicable rates.

    ”And all token reimbursements shall be issued to the affected customers by  April 11, 2024,”it said.

    The commission also directed the AEDC to file evidence of compliance with the directives in a & c with the Commission by April 12.

    “The action by the commission underscores its commitment to protecting consumer rights and ensuring equitable practices within Nigeria’s electricity sector,” it stated.

  • Electricity tariff hike: DisCo apologises to customers over wrongful charges

    Electricity tariff hike: DisCo apologises to customers over wrongful charges

    The Abuja Electricity Distribution (AEDC) has issued an apology on wrong charges faced by some Band A customers who tried to recharge their meters following the new tariff regime.

    The Management of AEDC tendered the apology in a notice to its customers in Abuja on Thursday.

    It said, ” This is to inform customers across the AEDC franchise that we are aware of the wrong charges faced by some Band A customers who tried to recharge their meters following the new tariff regime.

    “This is due to a system glitch caused by the reclassification of some Band A customers who have now been downgraded to B due to the number of hours of electricity supply enjoyed over the past few weeks.

    “These erstwhile Band A customers who vended were charged the new tariff of N225 per Kilowatt Hour. Our team is working to identify the customers affected and all excess charges will be refunded, ‘’ it said.

    According to AEDC, the situation also saw some Band A customers who are now charged N225 vend at the old rate.

    The company said that once the glitch is resolved, these categories of customers would now recharge their meters at the new rate of N225, which will ensure they enjoy a minimum supply of 20 hours daily.

    “We apologise for any inconvenience caused to our customers during this change.

    “We remain committed to improving the power supply to all categories of customers, and we crave your understanding and support as we do this, ‘’ it said.

  • Hike in electricity is a recipe for unrest – TUC warns FG

    Hike in electricity is a recipe for unrest – TUC warns FG

    The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria, TUC has described the hike in electricity tariff by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC as a recipe for unrest in the country.

    The Deputy President of the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria, TUC, Dr Tommy Okoh, said the hike is unacceptable, urging the government to allow the poor to breathe.

    According to him, the hike in the electricity tariff from 66/kwh to 225/kwh for people who enjoy electricity supply for 20 hours per day is totally unacceptable and a recipe for unrest.

    “This shows clearly that Nigeria is not ready for 24 hours electricity supply. As we speak, you cannot point anywhere in Nigeria that people are enjoying 20 hours of electricity supply, not even at the airport where it is expected for economic reasons.

    “We think the government has goofed again especially at this time of socioeconomic challenges where the cost of living is very exorbitant and the salary of the workers remained static.

    “Today, we are still battling with the fuel subsidy removal without any corresponding remedy and yet the increase in the electricity tariff without the supply of electricity. This government should know that they were not voted into office for the enslavement of the citizens but to protect and better the lots of the masses. This is an indication that the poor can no longer breathe.”

    Recall that the NERC had indicated that a total of 1,974,385 electricity consumers would be affected by its recent hike in tariff.

    It was gathered that the tariff hike was aimed at making a significant cut on the estimated N2.9 trillion electricity subsidy in the 2024 fiscal year.

    It was further learnt that the hike became inevitable following cash flow constraints arising from FG’s inability to pay obligations to the Nigeria Electricity Market.

    The NERC, on Tuesday, hiked electricity tariff for Band A customers by 230 percent from N68 per kilowatt hour to N225/kWh.

    Band A customers are those that receive an average daily supply electricity supply 20 hours or more. With the new order issued by NERC, Band A would no longer enjoy Federal Government subsidy on electricity.

    The NERC said on Wednesday that subsidy payments across the bands has become unsustainable.

    On July 1, 2023, President Bola Tinubu froze the electricity tariff at December 2022 level with a promise to pay the difference as subsidies. But the government has so far failed to pay any amount to the market, leading to the accumulation of N3.5 trillion debts to power generation companies and gas suppliers.

    The Vice Chairman, NERC, Mr. Musliu Oseni, said, in order to ensure that only customers who receive at least 20 hours of electricity daily are on Band A, the number of feeders that meet the threshold has been reduced from 875 to less than 500.

    He explained that only 15 percent of the 13,162,572 electricity customers nationwide would be affected by the tariff increase while the remaining customers would continue to pay the old rate until supply improved and they migrated to the new Band A.

    NERC expressed the hope that the additional revenue would attract investments into the sector, adding that it would deploy several tools to ensure that customers in Band A would get the daily hours of supply from electricity distribution companies, DisCos.