Tag: Elon Musk

  • Why I chose Elon Musk for Twitter – Jack Dorsey

    Why I chose Elon Musk for Twitter – Jack Dorsey

    Former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and co-founder of Twitter, Jack Dorsey has hailed Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform and opened up on his decision on Musk.

    Reacting to the $44 billion deal, Dorsey tweeted, “In principle, I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter. It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving the problem of it being a company, however, Elon is the singular solution I trust. I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness.

    “Elon’s goal of creating a platform that is “maximally trusted and broadly inclusive” is the right one. This is also #paraga’s goal, and why I chose him. Thank you both for getting the company out of an impossible situation. This is the right path…I believe it with all my heart.

    “I’m so happy Twitter will continue to serve the public conversation. Around the world, and into the stars!”

  • Twitter set for Elon Musk takeover in a mouth-watering deal

    Twitter set for Elon Musk takeover in a mouth-watering deal

    Elon Musk has finalize plans with twitter to take over with mouth-watering figure of approximately $44 billion.

    The official handing over will be announced soon via Twitter and other traditional and social media.

    Musk acquired the company at $54.20 a share, the same price named in his initial offer on April 14.

    The business mogul and taken to twitter to hint on the take over via his own verified page on the platform.

    his post reads:“Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” Musk said in a statement included with the release.

    “I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans.”

    Twitter CEO, Parag Agrawal, speaking on the deal, added: “Twitter has a purpose and relevance that impacts the entire world.

    “Deeply proud of our teams and inspired by the work that has never been more important.”

     

  • Twitter’s board adopts “poison pill” over billionaire’s Elon Musk $43bn (£33bn) offer for purchase of company

    Twitter’s board adopts “poison pill” over billionaire’s Elon Musk $43bn (£33bn) offer for purchase of company

    Following billionaire’s Elon Musk offer of $43bn (£33bn) to buy the Twitter, the board of the platform has adopted a “limited-duration shareholder rights plan”, also known as a “poison pill”

     

    It was gathered that the move will prevent anyone from having more than a 15% stake in the company.

     

    By this, others are allowed to buy additional shares at a discount.

     

    The Twitter board detailed its defence plan to the US Securities and Exchange Commission and put out a statement saying it was needed because of Mr Musk’s “unsolicited, non-binding proposal to acquire Twitter”.

     

    A takeover bid is considered hostile when one company tries to acquire another against the wishes of that company’s management – in Twitter’s case, its executive board.

     

    Josh White, former financial economist for the Securities and Exchange Commission, told the BBC that a poison pill is “one of those last lines of defence against a hostile bid takeover”.

     

    “We call it the nuclear option,” he said.

     

    Mr White says the board has made it clear “that they don’t feel like it’s a high enough value for the company”.

     

    Mr White says he was surprised by Mr Musk’s negotiation tactic because if the end game is to acquire the company it might not be the “right approach”.

     

    “I actually think if he was truly serious about the takeover attempt, he would have started at a price and left the window open for negotiation,” he said.

     

    The plan will expire on 14 April next year.

     

    Chief Executive Parag Agrawal previously said the company was not being “held hostage” by the offer.

     

    Meanwhile, Mr Musk said at the TED2022 conference in Vancouver: “I am not sure that I will actually be able to acquire it.” He added that he does have a “plan B”, though he did not divulge it.

     

    Mr Musk announced a 9.2% stake in the company earlier this month, but he is not the largest shareholder anymore. Asset management firm Vanguard Group disclosed that its funds now own a 10.3% stake.

     

    According to him, he believes Twitter is limiting freedom of speech on the platform and he reiterated this at the Vancouver event.

     

    He has said his primary motivation would be to expand free speech – a US Constitutional right – on Twitter.

     

    Mr Musk is being advised by the US investment bank Morgan Stanley.

     

    Meanwhile, Twitter is being helped by two banks, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, according to Bloomberg.

  • World’s richest man Elon Musk set to acquire Twitter

    World’s richest man Elon Musk set to acquire Twitter

    World’s richest man Elon Musk has tabled a bid to acquire social app Twitter.

    Presently about 217 millon active users are on the App and it offers a platform where celebrities, politicians, technicians connect and air their views.

     

    The bid came just weeks after Mr. Musk became the company’s largest shareholder (though his holdings appear to have been eclipsed since then by the investment management giant Vanguard). He offered $54.20 a share, valuing the company at roughly $43 billion.

    Mr. Musk, a Twitter power user with nearly 82 million followers, has long argued for the need for unfettered public speech. He has repeatedly criticized Twitter for moderating its platform too restrictively, and he previously floated the notion of radically shifting the power in social networking to users and away from behemoth companies

    “I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe,” Mr. Musk said in a letter sent to Bret Taylor, the chair of Twitter’s board, on Wednesday. “I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.”

    “Having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization,” he said Thursday. “I don’t care about the economics at all.”

    Born in Pretoria, on June 28, 1971, the son of an engineer father and a Canadian-born model mother, Musk left South Africa in his late teens to attend Queen’s University in Ontario.

    He transferred to the University of Pennsylvania after two years and earned bachelor’s degrees in physics and business

    Elon Reeve Musk FRS (born June 28, 1971) is a South African-Canadian-American businessman. He was born in South Africa. He moved to Canada and later became an American citizen

  • Elon Musk becomes Twitter largest shareholder

    Elon Musk becomes Twitter largest shareholder

    The world’s richest man, Elon Musk has acquired a 9.2 per cent stake in Twitter, making him its largest shareholder.

    Tesla CEO, Musk owns 73,486,938 shares of Twitter, which represents a 9.2 per cent stake in the company, according to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)13G filing released on Monday.

    The stake is worth $2.89 billion, based on Twitter’s closing price Friday.

    The announcement raised Twitter’s shares by more than 25 per cent in Monday’s premarket trading.

    This development comes less than two weeks after Musk questioned Twitter’s adherence to free speech principles.

    Musk had in March tweeted that he was giving “serious thought” about creating a new social media platform.

    “Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy. What should be done?”

    “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy. Do you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?

    “Is a new platform needed?” he tweeted.

    Musk is the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index.

  • 19-year-old demands N20 million from Elon Musk to delete Twitter account

    19-year-old demands N20 million from Elon Musk to delete Twitter account

    A 19-year-old has demanded the sum of $50,000, about 20 million in Naira, from the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Tesla Motors, Elon Musk, for him to delete a Twitter account that monitors the billionaire’s private jet.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Elon Musk had offered to pay the 19-year-old the sum of $5,000, about 2 million in Naira, for him to delete the account, as per report by Protocol.

    However, 19-year-old Jack Sweeney offered the counter amount of $50,000 in back and forth conversation they had, a proposition the billionaire was yet to respond to.

    According to the report, 19-year-old Jack Sweeney owns the Twitter account, Elon Musk’s Jet, and uses it to show real-time movements of Musk’s private jet, using bots that monitor publicly available air-traffic data.

    Read their conversation below:

    Elon Musk: “Can you take this down? It is a security risk.”

    Jack Sweeney: “Yes I can but it’ll cost you a Model 3 only joking unless?”

    Elon Musk: “I don’t love the idea of being shot by a nutcase. $5,000 to delete the account.

    Jack Sweeney: “I’ve put a lot of work into it, and $5k is just really not enough. Any chance to up that to $50k? It would be great support in college and would possibly allow me to get a car maybe even a Model 3.”

    After Jack Sweeney upped the ante, Elon Musk was yet to reach back to him, and as per the report, the billionaire was yet to pay the 19-year-old any dime, and the account, @ElonJet is still running.

    TNG reports the conversation happened in 2021, and Elon Musk tweeted earlier this month that social-media accounts tracking his movements are “becoming a security issue”.

    However, the Twitter account has not led to any dangerous incident so far, at least according to Jack Sweeney’s knowledge and information available online.

  • Lawmaker warns Nigerians not to follow Bill Gates, Elon Musk footstep

    Lawmaker warns Nigerians not to follow Bill Gates, Elon Musk footstep

    Nigerian lawmaker Akin Alabi, has asked people to stop encouraging others to drop out of school because tech billionaires Elon Musk and Bill Gates dropped out of school.

    In his post shared on social media, Akin stated that contrary to popular opinion, most tech billionaires graduated from school. He wrote

    ‘Over half of Billion Dollar tech companies founders have a minimum of masters degrees. Don’t encourage people to drop out school because Bill Gates and Elon Musk did. Let me tell you something’.

    ‘Elon Musk dropped out of PhD not JS2. ?. Bill Gates was a rich kid with a mother on the board of IBM. Be comparing that with yourself’.

    ‘Go to school, send your children to school. It’s the best bet for the average person to succeed. Of course, you can develop yourself in other areas’.

    See post:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Oloye Akin Alabi (@akinalabi)

  • Elon Musk to become first trillionaire on earth

    Elon Musk to become first trillionaire on earth

    Elon Musk, the world’s richest person is estimated to have a net worth of $242 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Although he is already the world’s richest person, he could also become the first member of the four-comma club.

    According to The Guardian, analysts at Morgan Stanley have predicted that Musk, 50, could become the world’s first trillionaire — largely thanks to his aerospace company SpaceX, People.com reports.

    “More than one client has told us that if Elon Musk were to become the first trillionaire… it won’t be because of Tesla,” analyst Adam Jones told the newspaper, referring to the electric car company behind the majority of his wealth to date.

    “Others have said SpaceX may eventually be the most highly valued company in the world — in any industry,” Jones added.

    Though humans have yet to reach Mars — one of Musk’s goals for the company — via SpaceX’s Starship, the advanced launch system already has high expectations following the success of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon.

    “As one client put it, ‘talking about space before Starship is like talking about the internet before Google,’ ” explains Jones.

    Earlier this month, the valuation of SpaceX increased to $100.3 billion, up from $74 billion in February, according to CNBC.

    The valuation made SpaceX — which Musk owns about 48% of the corporation — the world’s second-biggest privately held company, The Guardian states.

    SpaceX has celebrated a number of milestones this year, including successfully launching and landing a Starship rocket for the first time. Last month, SpaceX sent the first all-civilian crew into orbit.

    Musk is currently estimated to have a $242 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Tesla still remains his biggest asset.

    Back in January, Musk overtook Jeff Bezos to become the world’s richest person, only to briefly lose the title back to the Amazon billionaire the following month. Musk went on to reclaim his spot days later, following the completion of a SpaceX funding round, according to Fortune.

     

  • Nigerian shortlisted for a trip to the Moon

    Nigerian shortlisted for a trip to the Moon

    A Nigerian creative artist, Yemi Akinyemi-Dele, has made the list of the first 20 shortlisted applicants for a trip around the moon.

    Japanese billionaire, Yusaku Maezawa, had announced on March 2 that he would choose eight members of the public to join him on the trip.

    Maezawa’s mission, tagged “Dear Moon,” is scheduled to fly on SpaceX’s Starship rocket in 2023.

    The dear moon project is a mission organised by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and funded by the billionaire and founder of E-Shop in Zozo town with a passionate love for creative artists.

    The space mission project, which was open for creative art participants, attracted over one million applications across 249 countries around the world out of which only 20 were shortlisted and Yemi made the list to the final.

    The 20 shortlisted names would further be scrutinised with only eight selected for the mission to moon.

    With this development, Akinyemi-Dele, whose father hails from Lagos State and his mother from Czech Republic, would need the support and prayers of all Nigerians for him to be among the eight that would be selected for the Starship rocket mission with Maezawa in 2023.

    SpaceX Moon Project is the first in the series and it is expected that if Akinyemi-Dele is selected, he will create history by representing Nigeria and Czech Republic at the mission project.

  • Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and the frictions that destroy marriages in the new age

    Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and the frictions that destroy marriages in the new age

    Marriage they say is not a bed of roses. Marriage has grown. Marriage that we know has turned into a big boy. Marriage is now pompous. Marriage is no longer practised the way we know our parents did. The yardstick of our parents can no longer be used to measure marriage in this age of ours.

    We live in a new age where everything, occasioned by technology, is moving fast, including marriage. Since we find ourselves in a fast-paced world, no one is ready to take nonsense. As they say, you only live once (YOLO), so much that life has become too short to live it in nonsense.

    Since no one is ready to take nonsense in the new age, marriages are now dying at an alarming rate as though there is some sort of marital Coronavirus killing them.

    In 2016, official statistics suggested that the dissolution of marriage in Nigeria was uncommon. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, only 0.2% of men and 0.3% of women legally dissolved their marriage.

    However, according to a report in 2018, separation rates in Nigeria recorded a 14 percent increase. In another report published in 2018, a total of 3,000 divorce cases were recorded in Badagry, Lagos.

    Meanwhile, in a 2019 report titled ‘Deciphering the high rate of Divorce in Nigeria’, Kano state alone had over 1 million registered divorcees. Morealso, according to a news report, a visit to the Social Development Secretariat, Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) revealed that a total of 20 to 30 cases of divorce are reported at one of the offices daily.

    Furthermore, records at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court showed that over 2,000 divorce cases were filed between the year 2019 and February 2020, with an average of 30 cases being entertained every day, even as the Court is trying hard to reconcile couples through arbitration panels.

    Findings further revealed that the figure is higher at the Customary Courts, the Alkali and the Sharia Customary Courts within the FCT.

    The foregoing statistics paints a gloomy picture of marriage, and gives insights into the state of marriage in Nigeria, and indeed across the globe.

    We have seen marriages of not just the poor, but also those of the stupendously rich and wealthy collapse. If the marriages of Bill and Melinda Gates, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos, and that of Elon Musk and other stupidly rich billionaires can collapse, it is, therefore, safe to say money alone is not enough to keep a marriage.

    But, what is enough? Why are marriages failing as though unripe fruits falling from trees? Why does ‘I do’ turn into ‘I no do again’. Why do once lovey-dovey partners grow cold? What is going wrong with marriages?

    Needless to say, two persons coming together to spend the rest of their lives together in the union of marriage, must expect to have friction.

    Those who have managed the frictions that come with being married well deserve some special medals. They have helped to keep the marriage institution sane, giving hope to single people that it can be gotten right.

    Frictions in marriages are the issues that crop up as a result of two unique individuals coming together in the union of marriage. The ability to manage frictions goes a long way to show if a marriage will survive or not.

    More importantly, the frictions that come with marriage are now managed more differently than our parents did.

    To manage frictions, and save a marriage, partners have to be retrospective, examine themselves and understand what is causing frictions in the marriage.

    The experience of marriage has presented some issues witnessed firsthand that can destroy any marriage in this age.

    1. Backing out on terms

    One of the issues that can destroy any marriage in this age, is backing out on terms. What does this mean?

    Aside from the vows partners take at the altar or in the courtroom during the marriage ceremony, marriages are consummated on personal terms.

    Before taking the marriage vows, partners must have first agreed on these personal terms that may have to do with health, hygiene, finances, career, children, how to raise the kids, general upkeep and wellbeing of the home, how to run the home and what have you.

    Backing out on terms is a recipe for disaster in the marriage.

    This is bearing in mind that in every relationship, there is always the fool’s part to be played. You can think you ‘set leg’ for your partner and they fell to marry you. They will not continue to fall in the marriage. Deception can get you married but deceptions cannot keep a marriage.

    After the ceremony, reality will set in so much that you may now need to be deliberate to make the marriage work.

    So, stick to terms that brought you together in the first place, through thick and thin. If there be need to renegotiate terms, it should be for collective good, and a collective agreement, not a decision taken by one party and forced down on the other.

    2. Not prioritising your partner

    Another issue that can destroy marriage in this age that immediately follows backing out on terms is not prioritising your partner.

    At the end of the day, every human being is an emotional creature, no matter how hard some may appear.

    Some partners make the mistake of pricing their job, material belongings costlier than their partners, thus giving more attention to them more than they do their partner.

    Partners must, as important as making other things work, create time for each other. Partners must understand each other’s needs and mostly tilt towards fulfilling them. Know what your partner wants, and do it for them, even if it means sacrificing. In doing this, partners should not be inconsiderate; they should know when a sacrifice is being made, and be appreciative.

    Partners should know the love language of their partners. Words of affection may work for some partners while actual actions may work for others. Some partners value gifts, acts of service and physical touch. When you know what works, loud it.

    In whatever job you do, your partner must fit in. The job should afford you quality time with your partner.

    Spending less or little time with your spouse kills marriage. Being too independent minded kills marriage. Love for party, money, impulse buying and spending, partying, financial indiscipline kill marriage. There should be a balance.

    If you made the decision to marry, from the onset, you must have created a space in your life for your significant other. Once this changes, everything changes.

    3. Unwillingness to learn

    Use what works in your marriage. What works for and in marriage Z may not work in marriage B.

    Three plus three gives six, so is four plus two and five plus one. If four plus two to give six does not yield the desired result in your marriage, drop it. If it is five plus one to arrive at six that works in the marriage, use it, always. Worse is to force two to plus three to give six. It won’t work!

    Two individuals who came together for marriage must learn how to learn, must learn how to unlearn, must learn how to shift grounds and use what works. No one is perfect, they say, but they also say, learning makes perfect. A partner that always sings the chorus of no one is perfect, is a partner that is unwilling to learn. While a marriage may not achieve perfection, achieving excellence is possible.

    If it is the approach of your partner that works, the other partner must learn over time to drop the approach they adopt and do not get results with to learn the approach with which to get results.

    Plus, marriage is not a place for opposing principles. Partners are meant to cooperate and not compete. Partners should, therefore, be ready to learn from their partner; learn to accept and adopt principles that work and drop those that do not work.

    It is a mistake to remain stagnant and expect to be loved the way you are. Love itself, in this new age, as well as money as mentioned earlier, is not enough to keep a marriage. Partners have to be deliberate.

    When a partner is unwilling to learn, especially learn how to get things right, make things work, pray from Abuja to Australia, pull down the wall of Jericho, the marriage will collapse.

    There is the temptation to become more hardened after correction. This should be avoided by every means possible.

    How does a computer learn new things? Bit by bit!

    4. Antagonism and rebellion

    In this age, everyone wants to marry their bestie or at least, their partners should be their bestie. As stated earlier, partners are meant to cooperate and not compete. A partner wants to be sure that their partner got their back.

    There should not be opposing energies in the home. Unhealthy competition, always opposing your partner, will destroy any marriage. If you are always against your partner, and always resist what not may, sooner than later the marriage will hit rock bottom.

    Marriage is not a place for antagonism, not a place for resistance to the authority of that of the husband nor that of the wife.

    Rebellion, especially calculative, and when premeditated, has killed many marriages. If partners continue to ferment trouble, nowhere else sweet wine will come from, they will have to drink sour wines.

    5. Bringing third party in

    Bringing third party, especially an unprofessional one, into a marriage is a recipe for failure.

    An unprofessional third party will only magnify your problems. A third party, if not professional, will make a two-dimensional (his side and her side) issue become 3-dimensional or even multidimensional. Partners that have not been able to resolve two-dimensional issues, what luck do they have when issues become multidimensional.

    When issues start going to third parties, they start getting out of hand.

    6. Sweeping issues under the carpet

    Issues are the bane of marriages. Issues partners refused to address today, will resurface tomorrow to haunt them. So are habits.

    Therefore, it is not safe to sweep issues under the carpet. No matter how difficult a partner might appear, a spouse must always find an avenue to discuss issues. Do not draw conclusions when you have not discussed an issue with your partner. Do not make preemptive assumptions and do not take preemptive decisions when you are yet to hear from your partner.

    Discussions should be approached with the view to build, not to destroy. Every issue should be approached positively, in a positive light and with a positive mindset.

    Discussions between partners should observe the principle of quantity i.e. structured to be informative as required, and address the current purposes of exchange.

    Discussions should also observe the principle of quality i.e. nothing and nothing but the truth should be said. In observing the principle of quality, do not say what you believe is false and do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.

    Also, in discussing issues in marriage, partners should observe the principle of relevance i.e. a partner should ensure that all the information they provide is relevant to the current discussion; therefore, omitting any irrelevant information.

    The principle of manner should also be observed as well. In simple terms, the principle of manner is to be clear. If this is observed, misunderstandings would be minimised. Misunderstandings should be properly addressed, especially from its onset, and not allowed to flourish.

    Whereas the previous principles are primarily concerned with what is said, the principle of manner is concerned with how what is said is said. Body language counts a lot. A partner may say a dozen but what the other picked is the body language, maybe the lackadaisical attitude.

    The bottom line is that, if an issue should come up, it should be deliberated exhaustively, devoid of insults. Partners should be able to address issues without recourse to overt or covert insults.

    While there is no place for violence in marriage, repeated insults could lead to violence. Most importantly, do not dare your partner, especially when they are angry.

    In a nutshell, partners should know what to say, when to say it, and how to say it. Too much and careless talk can kill a marriage.

    In all, there is always a place for shifting grounds. The place of discussing issues is a place for shifting grounds, and in shifting grounds, it should be resolving on what works, and not resolving on what practice in the marriage has shown won’t work.

    Resolving for what won’t work is a recipe to destroy the marriage.

    In all, the channel of communication should be left perpetually open in a marriage. Marriages end when there is a breakdown in communication.

    7. Manipulation

    Marriage is not a place for manipulation. Marriage is not a place where you exert devious and dubious influence on your partner and you expect the marriage to remain whole. People can get away with manipulating people in business, in politics, and what have you, but not in marriage, especially in this age.

    If you disrespect your partner, expect them to get angry. If you continually disrespect your partner, expect them to continually get angry. If you disrespect your partner and expect them not to get angry, it is manipulation.

    When you decide to always play smart, the day your partner decides to stop playing the fool’s part, the marriage hits the brick wall.

    8. Gaslighting

    Gaslighting is mad. Gaslighting chokes; it restricts airflow; it is what makes a partner go crazy easily.

    In marriage, as noted in sweeping issues under the carpet, always say what you mean, and mean what you say. Do not say one thing, and when your partner reminds you, you meant something else. It drives a partner crazy.

    Backing down on your words or always twisting them when it matters most, drives people crazy. You should be able to say a thing and stand by it when the need arises. You should be able to be the person of your words. When you manipulate your partner psychologically, they will start questioning their own sanity; expect them to go mad, someday.

    If you do not want madness in your marriage, avoid gaslighting your partner. Nobody loves to be played.

    9. Unrepentance and unforgiveness

    Repentance and forgiveness go hand in hand, so also unrepentance and unforgiveness. Where there is an unforgiving partner, there is always first an unrepentant partner.

    Mistakes are bound to happen, whether partners like it or not. When mistakes happen, forgive.

    But, making mistakes should never become a habit. When mistakes become habits, a partner, no matter the strength of character, would be worn out; patience and tolerance will thin out.

    A geography class on the weathering of rocks teaches that repeated wetting and drying of rocks causes exfoliation. Exfoliation over time can reduce rock to nothing.

    The rule is, do not get in the habit of always giving red flags. Do not get in the habit of wrongdoing always. Do not get in the habit of always making mistakes. Most times, one red flag, one wrongdoing, one mistake is too much a burden to bear.

    It is inhuman to continue in bad habits, and expect a partner to die in silence. Partners should know that for every action, there is always a reaction, whether expressed overtly or not. Repeated actions and reactions lead to a chain reaction. Negative chain reactions have destroyed marriages.

    Not changing for good, but staying put and expecting a partner to accept you for who you are, is a recipe for failure.

    The worse a partner will do is to try to play down or water down an offence. An unforgiving partner, most times, is made by an unrepentant partner.

    At this juncture, it is important to point out that divorce is not entirely bad. In many instances, it has been a relief to a dysfunctional or unproductive marriage. However, if it’s possible to prevent a divorce, it is advisable to do so by all means.

    You should know your partner. You should know what they can do and what they cannot do, and make your marriage work thereby.

    PS: The institution of marriage has come a long way to exhaustively dissect issues therein in one piece. If you know any issue affecting marriages, or you have advice for married people or those intending to get married, leave a comment below.