Tag: EU

  • Ezekwesili hails EU, says report on election monitoring topnotch

    Ezekwesili hails EU, says report on election monitoring topnotch

    Former Minister of Education, Obiageli Ezekwesili has commended the European Union Election Observation Mission, saying it still maintains credibility in election monitoring.

    According to her,  the report on the 2023 election “surprisingly restored a measure of confidence in election monitoring around the world by not mincing words at all.”

    She made this statement on Tuesday via her verified Twitter handle, saying that unlike its report on Nigeria, Observer Mission Reports were beginning to be cookie-cutters that seemed to trade-off electoral credibility.

    She further stated that the report “diverged from the global trend and restored confidence in Election Observation.”

    She wrote, “The @euinNigeria surprisingly restored a measure of confidence in election monitoring around the world by not mincing words at all in their European Union Election Observation Mission NIGERIA 2023 Final Report.

    “Here’s how the @UN regards Elections Observation:

    “Why observe elections?

    “Election observation is a valuable tool for improving the quality of elections. Observers help build public confidence in the honesty of electoral processes.

    “Observation can help promote and protect the civil and political rights of participants in elections. It can lead to the correction of errors or weak practices, even while an election process is still underway. It can deter manipulation and fraud, or expose such problems if they do occur.

    “When observers can issue positive reports, it builds trust in the democratic process and enhances the legitimacy of the governments that emerge from elections.

    “Election observation by domestic groups encourages civic involvement in the political process. Following elections, reports and recommendations by observer groups can lead to changes and improvements in national law and practice.

    “Those who follow global trends in election monitoring know that Observer Mission Reports were beginning to be cookie-cutters that seemed to trade-off electoral credibility.

    “I highly recommend the EU Report… It did not trade off electoral credibility at all.

    “It diverged from the global trend and restored confidence in Election Observation.”

  • EU faults Supreme Court’s reinstatement of Ahmad Lawan

    EU faults Supreme Court’s reinstatement of Ahmad Lawan

    The European Union Election Observation Mission (EUEOM) has criticised the Supreme Court, saying that it has tarnished its public perception by reinstating former Senate President Ahmad Lawan to the red chamber, despite his non-participation in the primaries election.

    Recall that initially, Lawan had contested the presidential ticket of the ruling party All Progressives Congress, (APC) but after being defeated by Bola Tinubu, he secure the senatorial ticket in his district

    But the EU in its recently released final report titled ‘Election Observation Mission Nigeria 2023’, said the Supreme Court continues to maintain a negative perception after reinstating Senator Ahmed Lawan, who never participated in primaries for the Senate

    “The Nigerian Supreme Court continues to maintain a negative perception after reinstating Senator Ahmed Lawan, who never participated in primaries for the Senate. The high court and appeal court judgments were against this.”

    The Supreme Court’s ruling that brought in Lawan emerged from a political battle between Mr. Lawan and his political ally Bashir Machina, who refused to relinquish the APC ticket for the Yobe North senatorial district.

    However, Mr. Machina, the rightful winner of the Yobe North senatorial ticket, stood his ground, refusing to surrender it under any circumstances. To remove Mr. Machina and support Mr. Lawan, the APC urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to adopt the former Senate president as its senatorial candidate for Yobe North in the 2023 elections.

    Eventually, on February 6, 2023, the controversial ruling by the Supreme Court went in favour of Mr. Lawan.

  • EU report on presidential election example of fake news- Fani-kayode

    EU report on presidential election example of fake news- Fani-kayode

    The former minister of aviation and also a chieftain of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), chief Femi Fani-Kayode has faulted the European Union Election Observation Mission (EUEOM) for their allegation of spreading fake news during the recent election.

    Recall that the EU had accused Festus Keyamo, former Minister for State and Employment, as well as Fani-Kayode of misleading the Nigerian public by disseminating false information during the 2023 elections.

    The EU observers pointed out instances where Fani-kayode and Keyamo allegedly spread fake news while promoting their respective candidates.

    Reacting on Twitter, Fani-Kayode dismissed the EU report as the largest fabrication of news and urged it to be disregarded completely.

    He further claimed that the EU harboured resentment due to their favoured presidential candidate’s loss in the election.

    According to him, every assertion made by the APC concerning the opposition party’s efforts to obstruct Tinubu’s triumph became a reality, and the EU’s claims of irregularities and rigging aimed to tarnish the president’s image.

    “The EU report on the 2023 presidential election in Nigeria is itself the biggest and best example of fake news and it belongs in the dustbin.

    “There is not one thing we said during the campaign about the antics of the opposition, their foreign collaborators, their friends and backers in identifiable sections of the Nigerian and international media and their subterranean and covert co-conspirators in the then corridors of powers that is not true.

    “We have not forgotten what they subjected us to, what they did to us, and the role each and every one of them played. Their collective intention was to stop PBAT and, thanks be to God, they failed.

    “The truth is that the EU is still smarting over the fact that it’s preferred candidate lost. We know what happened behind the scenes but that is a story for another day. The most important thing is that PBAT prevailed.

    “Now they are trying to diminish, discredit and tarnish his victory by saying that the election was flawed with irregularities and rigged and that his front line generals and warriors, who stood with him in the heat of battle, indulged in fake news.

    “They are nothing but poor losers and lost souls and whether they like it or not PBAT is here to stay and, God-willing, will lead Nigeria for the next 8 years!

    “I am glad that the Presidency has responded to their dishonest, disrespectful and contemptuous report in a decisive and appropriate manner.”

  • Presidency rejects EU verdict on 2023 elections

    Presidency rejects EU verdict on 2023 elections

    The Presidency has rejected verdict of the European Union on outcome of the February 25 presidential election, which saw the emergence of President Bola Tinubu as winner.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reported
    the European Union Election Observer Mission in Nigeria (EU EOM) disclosed that the poll was marred due to multiple failures by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    A statement, yesterday, issued by Dele Alake, Special Adviser on Special Duties, Communication and Strategy, also said it “strongly rejects, in its entirety, any notion and idea from any organisation, group and individual remotely suggesting that the 2023 election was fraudulent.”

    Dismissing the verdict, the Presidency berated the EU, saying the organisation merely relied on prejudiced and uninformed social media commentaries and opposition talking heads to arrive at its conclusions. It added that the body failed to provide substantial evidence to impeach integrity of the election outcome.

    The statement reads in part: “Sometimes in May, we alerted the nation, through a press statement, to plan by a continental multilateral institution to discredit the 2023 general elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    “The main target was the presidential election, clearly and fairly won by the then candidate of All Progressives Congress (APC), Bola Ahmed Tinubu. While we did not mention the name of the organisation in the said statement, we made it abundantly clear to Nigerians how this foreign institution had been unrelenting in its assault on credibility of the electoral process, the sovereignty of our country and on our ability as a people to organise ourselves.

    “We find it preposterous and unconscionable that in this day and age, any foreign organisation of whatever hue can continue to insist on its own yardstick and assessment as the only way to determine the credibility and transparency of our elections.

    “Now that the organisation has submitted what it claimed to be its final report on the elections, we can now categorically let Nigerians and the entire world know that we were not unaware of the machinations of the European Union to sustain its, largely, unfounded bias and claims on the election outcomes.

    “For emphasis, we want to reiterate that the 2023 general elections, most especially the presidential election, won by President Bola Tinubu/APC, were credible, peaceful, free, fair and the best organised general elections in Nigeria since 1999.

    “It is worth restating that the limitation of EU’s final assessment and conclusions on our elections was made very bare in the text of the press conference addressed by the Head of its Electoral Observation Mission, Barry Andrews. While addressing journalists in Abuja on the so-called final report, Andrews noted that EU-EOM monitored the pre-election and post-election processes in Nigeria from January 11 to April 11, 2023 as an INEC accredited election monitoring group.

    “Within this period, EU-EOM observed the elections through 11 Abuja-based analysts, and 40 election observers spread across 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. With the level of personnel deployed, which was barely an average of one person per state, we wonder how EU-EOM independently monitored election in over 176,000 polling units across Nigeria.

    “We would like to know and even ask EU, how it reached the conclusions in the submitted final report with the very limited coverage of the elections by their observers who, without doubt, relied more on rumours, hearsay, cocktails of prejudiced and uninformed social media commentaries and opposition talking heads.

    “We are convinced that what EU-EOM called final report on our recent elections is a product of a poorly done desk job that relied heavily on few instances of skirmishes in less than 1,000 polling units out of over 176,000 where Nigerians voted on election day.

    “We have many reasons to believe the jaundiced report, based on the views of fewer than 50 observers, was to merely sustain the same premature denunciatory stance contained in EU’s preliminary report released in March.

    “We strongly reject, in its entirety, any notion and idea from any organisation, group and individual remotely suggesting that the 2023 election was fraudulent.

    “Our earlier position that the technology-aided 2023 general elections were the most transparent and best organised elections since the return of civil rule in Nigeria has been validated by all non-partisan foreign and local observers. Such are: the African Union, ECOWAS, Commonwealth Observer Mission and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).

    “Unlike EU-EOM that deployed fewer than 50 observers, the NBA that sent out over 1,000 observers spread across the entire country for same election gave a more holistic and accurate assessment of the elections in their own report.

    “NBA, an organisation of eminent lawyers and an important voice within the civic space, reported that 91.8 per cent of Nigerians rated the conduct of the national and state elections as credible and satisfactory. Any election that over 90 per cent of the citizens considered transparent should be celebrated anywhere in the world.”
    In this article

  • EU tops up military aid for Ukraine, others with €3.5bn

    EU tops up military aid for Ukraine, others with €3.5bn

    European Union (EU) foreign ministers decided on Monday to top up the fund for military aid for Ukraine and other partner countries.

    The top-up fund would amount to another 3.5 billion euros (3.82 billion dollars), an EU spokeswoman has said.

    “We will continue to double down on our military support on both equipment (and) training, for as long as it takes,’’ EU top diplomat Joseph Borrell wrote on Twitter, announcing the move.

    Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the EU has already mobilised 3.6 billion euros from the fund for military support for Kiev, according to EU figures.

    Arriving at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg, Borrell said continuing to support Kiev today was more important than ever.

    Wagner troops advanced toward Moscow on Saturday with the aim of toppling the Russian military leadership until the mission came to an abrupt end.

    The recent events showed that the war against Ukraine is leading to cracks in the Russian power system and affecting the country’s political system, Borrell said.

    The tensions in Russia overshadowed the meeting of EU top diplomats, with ministers mulling the potential consequences of the short-lived uprising.

    The power struggle in Russia is far from over, said German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock arriving at the meeting.

    “It is obviously only one act in this Russian drama. It remains unclear what will happen to the various players in Russia,’’ she said.

    Russia’s war in Ukraine has devastating consequences on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s power system, leading to massive cracks in Russia’s propaganda, Baerbock said.

    “We are analyzing this closely because, of course, this also entails risks that we are still unable to assess at the moment,’’ the minister said.

    Baerbock also emphasized the importance of continued support for Ukraine, adding that Germany is to supply Kiev with 45 Gepard tanks until the end of the year.

    Putin is destroying his own country with the brutal war of aggression against Ukraine, Baerbock concluded.

    EU foreign affairs chief Borrell struck a similar chord, saying Putin created a monster by starting the war.

    “The monster is biting him now. The monster is acting against his creator,’’ he added, referring to the attempted Wagner uprising at the weekend.

    Luxembourg’s Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn warned of the potential consequences for Europe “if the largest country of the world with the most nuclear weapons world-wide is to crumble.’’

    He also pointed to other potential impacts of the power struggle in Russia that could bring uncertainty to Wagner troops deployed in African countries and make the on-going war in Ukraine even more brutal.

    Even before the events of the weekend in Russia, EU foreign ministers were expected to deal with several crises in the bloc’s vicinity.

    Heightened tensions between Kosovo and Serbia and a recent mediation meeting in Brussels which brought little progress were on the agenda, as well as the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the situation in Tunisia.

    The EU is considering supporting Tunisia with an aid package of up to 900 million euros.

    With the North African country is roiled by economic woes and rising numbers of migrants using it as a launch pad to reach Europe.

    Ministers were also expected to impose new sanctions on Iran over persistent human rights violations.

    On a more positive note, diplomatic and trade relations with the Caribbean and Latin America are also on the agenda ahead of a summit with the countries of the region held in Brussels in July.

  • African peacemakers: Rescuing Europeans from mutual slaughter – By Owei Lakemfa

    African peacemakers: Rescuing Europeans from mutual slaughter – By Owei Lakemfa

    Seven African leaders stunned the world on June 16 and 17, 2023 when they went on a peace mission to warring Ukraine and Russia.

    The reaction from many in the West was that of contempt; how is it the place of lowly Africa to intervene in a war of Europeans?

    In fact, Poland tried to scuttle the mission by detaining for 30 hours the aircraft carrying the protection unit of President Cyril Ramaphosa, leader of the delegation. Its claim was that the security men carried “dangerous goods”(weapons). Did they expect them to carry candies? The protocol all over the world is for the paper work for the weapons to be submitted; but Poland declined.

    Eventually, the aircraft which also had a dozen journalists on board, could not join Ramaphosa as Hungary barred it from using its airspace. These are clear indications that some Europeans countries do not want peace.

    The United States had also tried to scuttle the peace process by its Congress insisting that sanctions be imposed on South Africa for being a member of the Brazil, Russia, India , China and South Africa, BRICS, economic initiative and promising to allow President Vladimir Putin on whom it had imposed unilateral sanctions, to attend the BRICS meeting in South Africa without any consequences.

    The reaction of some in Africa was one of self-denigration: how can African leaders think of making peace among Europeans, especially when the Pope, the United Nations and China had failed? Some, in trying to portray the African leaders as jobless busy bodies asked: what is Africa’s business? I will tell you what our business is by retelling a true story.

    The European countries in search of territories, and to exploit the world’s human and natural resources went on a voyage to colonise the rest of the world.

    As is often the case with the greedy tortoise, they came close to blows, and in 1884, met in Berlin to agree on how they would steal the resources of other peoples without fighting themselves. But greed has no limit, so on July 28, 1914, they commenced an All-European War. Since there were no persons to mediate, the Europeans were left on their own and at the end, 16 million human beings were killed in what they beatified as the First World War.

    Despite the Europeans proclaiming that the First World War was a “War to end all wars”, they were back at another endless slaughter from September 1939. This time, some 85 million human beings were killed. They christened this slaughter, the Second World War. In each of these wars, genocide was a side menu. In the first, Armenians were the main victims, while in the second it was six million Jews. In all these, innocent Africans, Asians and Latin Americans were killed as they were forced to fight for both sides.

    So today, with the same countries engaged in another slaughter, is it logical for anybody to ask what the concern of Africa is?

    If the senseless war in Ukraine were not brought to a quick and peaceful end as the African leaders are trying to do, is anybody in doubt that all humanity would be affected and that part of the war would also be fought on African soil as it happened in the Second World War?

    When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday told the African leaders that he is not interested in peace and is confident of resolving issues militarily, is anyone fooled that his faith is in the decimated Ukrainian armed forces? Is anybody in doubt that the war in Ukraine is an international one with the military from various countries, including America, Asia and Europe, engaged? Are we to pretend that since those armies are not fighting under their countries’ flags, then they are not on the battle field?

    Did those querying the business of Africa in pushing for peace, listen to Putin when the African peace ambassadors asked him if the Russian nuclear weapons recently deployed to Belarus would be used? He had retorted that in case of a “threat to the Russian statehood” they would be used. He emphasised: “In that case, we will certainly use all the means that the Russian state has. There should be no doubt about that.” So, is Africa to do nothing in the face of a possible Third World War in which nuclear weapons will be used or do people think all these is a joke?

    Those who argue that Africa has no business initiating peace in Ukraine are like occupants of a multiple storey building who claim that it is not their business if an occupant on the ground floor decides to blow up his flat.

    Some scoff that the African leaders returned home empty handed. Such people do not seem to understand that a peace process is not a quick fix; once it is not going to be an imposition, it is often a marathon race. An African saying goes: an elder that listens to only one side of a story to pass judgement is a wicked elder. So the African leaders have gone to Kyiv and Moscow, listened to the combatants, poked them for response and watched their body language.

    A wise step the African leaders also took was to ensure their team includes friends of the warriors and their allies who might be beating the drums to which they are so energetically dancing. It is a known fact that South Africa is not opposed to Russia; Egypt is an ally of the United States and Senegal strives to be in the good books of France.

    Again, there are those who argue that we have not been able to settle African conflicts like the senseless one in Sudan. True, but that does not mean we cannot strive for peace in Ukraine as we are also doing in Sudan. By the way, who praised Africa for the peace process in Ethiopia?

    Then, there are those who query why the African countries went on the peace mission rather than the African Union, AU. To me, it is not on all issues we must wait for the bureaucracy of the AU to agree before an action can commence. In any case, how do they know the AU was unaware of the peace mission? How do they know the delegation did not get the nod of the AU before setting out?

    I wish the African peacemakers: Presidents Ramaphosa, Macky Sall of Senegal, Comoros’ Azali Assoumani and Hakainde Hichilema of Zambia, Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly of Egypt and the envoys from Congo-Brazzaville and Uganda, success.

    Africans cannot just sit back and watch the Europeans engage in another mutual slaughter or ignite a Third World War.

  • IPOB slams UN, EU, others over silence on Nnamdi Kanu’s detention

    IPOB slams UN, EU, others over silence on Nnamdi Kanu’s detention

    The  Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has expressed their displeasure over the silence of United Nations (UN), the Europen Union (EU), the African Union (AU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) on the detention of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

    The group in a statement by Emma Powerful, media and publicity secretary, Wednesday said the Nigerian government wants Kanu to to die in detention.

    Early Wednesday, a popular Biafra agitator, Separatist Simon Ekpa, has raised the alarm over the worsening health condition of IPOB leader.

    Ekpa disclosed that Kanu instructed him to inform the world that his ear infection is deteriorating.

    Reacting to Kanu’s health challenge, the group expressed its dissatisfaction over the continued detention of its leader as the issue worsens despite the UN and Nigerian court orders that he should be freed.

    It said, “We the Indigenous People of Biafra (lPOB), led by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu expressed our displeasure on the silence of United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), African Union (AU) and ECOWAS as Nigeria grossly disobeys local and international laws regarding the unconditional release of our leader.

    “We are saddened as the International Community watches in silence as the health of the leader deteriorates in the solitary confinement dungeon of the Nigeria government where he has been held illegally and unlawfully against all UN and Nigeria Court Orders for almost 2 years.”

    It further stated, “We believe that the Nigerian government wants our leader to die in detention. It is also possible that DSS has given him a slow-acting poison, which is why his health keeps deteriorating to eventually kill him.

    “In what we consider a conspiracy to kill our leader, the Nigeria Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court refused to entertain an appeal from Mazi Nnamdi KanuU’s lawyers over his deteriorating health. Instead, the Apex Court gave a wicked long adjournment of 4 months to an innocent man that Appeal Court Justices have discharged and acquitted.

    “In all these human rights and court abuses, there seems to be a conspiratory silence among international organisations and her affiliate Human Right Organisations.”

    IPOB said it would do everything possible to make sure its leader does not die in detention.

    “As the health of our leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu continues to deteriorate and the Nigerian government refuses to obey lawful orders and the world maintains this criminal silence, IPOB will do all within our power to ensure that our leader does not die in detention.”

     

  • Kosovo citizens to travel to EU without visa

    Kosovo citizens to travel to EU without visa

    Kosovo citizens will be able to travel to the European Union without visa from 2024 at the latest after the European Parliament gave the green light on Tuesday.

    The vote by the EU legislature in Strasbourg, France, was the last legal step required to grant visa-free travel to Kosovo citizens after member states gave their backing in March.

    Under the new rules, which could apply even before 2024, people with Kosovo passport would be able to travel to the EU without visa and stay for up to 90 days in any 180-day period.

    Today’s “decision on visa liberalisation is a victory for the people of Kosovo, for democracy and for European unity,” wrote Vjosa Osmani, the president of Kosovo, on Twitter.

    Kosovo is the last country in the Western Balkans region to be granted visa-free travel to the bloc.

  • Why voters refused to turn out in guber polls – EU Observer

    Why voters refused to turn out in guber polls – EU Observer

    Mr Barry Andrew, the European Union (EU) Chief Election Observation Mission (EOM) Officer, has said obstruction and organised violence limited the turn out of voters for Saturday’s Governorship and Assembly elections.

    Mr Andrew said this at the second news conference which highlighted that the obstruction led to voters not able to exercise their rights in spite of efforts by civil societies to promote democratic standards.

    He said that throughout the mission, they saw that Nigerians had a great appetite for democracy and were keen to engage in various civic activities.

    “However, in many parts of the country, their expectations were not met. Many were disappointed and we witnessed voter apathy that is in part, a clear consequence of failures by political elites and unfortunately, also by INEC, ” the chief observer said.

    He added that in their observation, INEC had introduced some corrective measures ahead of the Saturday’s polls, which allowed a timely delivery of sensitive materials and improved use of election technologies.

    But, however, he added that the institution lacked transparency, adding that the EU EOM observer noted that voting on March 18 mostly started on time.

    “With INEC ad hoc officials present and ready to serve the voters, polling on election day was disrupted by multiple incidents of thuggery and intimidation of voters, polling officials, observers, and journalists.

    “Lagos, Kano, and other states in the southern and central part were most affected. Unfortunately, there were many casualties and fatalities.

    ”Votes-buying, also directly observed by EU EOM observers, further detracted from an appropriate conduct of the elections.

    “Also campaigns in state elections were competitive. Fundamental freedoms of assembly and movement were largely respected, however, insecurity impeded the canvassing of votes in certain parts of the country.

    “Organised violent attacks shortly before the elections in several states led to a fearful atmosphere. Some state governors took executive actions, negatively affecting the campaign environment.

    “EU EOM observers also saw misuse of administrative resources, including through various financial and in-kind inducements to voters, giving an undue advantage to the party in power,” he said.

    The EU EOM observers will issue a public preliminary statement after election day.

    They will also produce a comprehensive final report, undertake public outreach activities to raise public awareness of their presence, mandate and roles.

  • Updates: INEC’s inadequacies, lack of transparency mar 2023 elections – EU report

    Updates: INEC’s inadequacies, lack of transparency mar 2023 elections – EU report

    The EU Observation Mission has presented a preliminary report indicating that INEC’s inadequacies, lack of transparency and abuse of incumbency distorted the 2023 general elections.

    The report further stated that:”Fundamental freedoms of assembly and movement were largely respected, yet the full enjoyment of the latter was impeded by insufficient planning, insecurity and the prevailing Naira and fuel shortages.

    “Abuse of incumbency by various political office holders distorted the playing field and there were widespread allegations of vote buying. Media provided an extensive coverage of the three leading campaigns, while disinformation interfered with voters’ right to make an informed choice on election day.

    “The EU EOM is continuing its observation of the ongoing collation and tabulation of results throughout the country.

    “INEC’s operational capacity was hampered by the ongoing fuel and Naira shortage. Insecurity prevented it from accessing some Local Government Areas (LGAs), notably in the South. Attacks on INEC premises, including just days before polling, hindered preparations in affected areas, while instilling fear in voters. Overall, stakeholders had expressed confidence in INEC’s independence, professionalism, and voter information efforts, but this decreased ahead of elections.

    “INEC lacked efficient planning and transparency during critical stages of the electoral process, while on election day trust in INEC was seen to further reduce due to delayed polling processes and information gaps related to much anticipated access to results on its Results Viewing Portal (IReV).

    “In the lead-up to elections, the widely welcomed Electoral Act 2022 introduced measures aimed at building stakeholder trust, however leaving some important gaps in terms of accountability and INEC’s power to enforce the law.

    Weak points include a lack of INEC empowerment to enforce sanctions for electoral offences and breaches of campaign finance rules. Positively, INEC benefited from more timely financing than for previous contests. Other new provisions also aimed to enhance transparency of results.

    The introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the IReV for the 2023 elections was perceived as an important step to ensure the integrity and credibility of elections.

    However, delayed training of technical personnel, an inadequate mock testing exercise, and a lack of public information on the election technologies diminished expectations and left room for speculation and uncertainty.

    During the early stages of collation, presidential result forms from polling units were not displayed on the IReV, while Senate and House of Representative results were slowly published. Presidential election result forms started to be uploaded after 10 pm on election day, raising concerns and reaching only 20 per cent by noon on 26 February. Later the same evening, INEC explained the delay with “technical hitches.”

    Among 93.4 million registered voters, 9.5 million additional voters were registered ahead of the 2023 polls, of whom two-thirds were youth following mobilisation efforts during the registration period. Yet, the collection of permanent voter cards (PVC), a requirement to vote, was negatively affected by poor institutional planning. Two days before elections, INEC stated that 93.3 per cent of PVCs were collected. Without an independent audit of the voter register, quality and inclusiveness could not be assured.

    Following contentious candidate registration processes there were18 contestants for the presidential office and over 4200 for 461 national assembly seats. They were selected in party primaries that reportedly lacked transparency and inclusiveness, marked by very chronically low levels of participation of women and youth. This compounded an overall stark lack of legal measures for inclusion and barriers to participation which do not align with international standards.

    The conduct of contesting parties and candidates, as well as some gaps in the law, led to a spate of pre- election court cases, with some matters not finalised ahead of elections. During the pre-election period, EU EOM interlocutors criticised various court rulings for being too technical, some leading to belated primary re-runs, others to substitutions of perceived legitimate candidates, thereby eroding public trust, exposing intra-party conflicts, and contributing to a volatile campaign environment.

    The campaign was highly competitive, and contestants conducted rallies nationwide, but the Naira cash and fuel scarcity reduced activities and attendance. Political parties denounced unequal campaign conditions due to interference of opponent governors. Reports of vote and PVC buying were also frequent. Internal party conflicts weakened the presidential campaigns of PDP and APC with personal accusation obscuring issue-based
    Menu
    European Union says Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election ‘distorted’, not credible
    “INEC lacked efficient planning and transparency during critical stages of the electoral process, while on election day trust in INEC was seen to further reduce due to delayed polling processes

    PRESS RELEASE • FEBRUARY 27, 2023
    Mahmood Yakubu and EU
    Mahmood Yakubu and EU used to illustrate the story.
    Nigerians went to the polls in highly anticipated presidential and National Assembly elections that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) kept on schedule despite a volatile and challenging environment. Fundamental freedoms of assembly and movement were largely respected, yet the full enjoyment of the latter was impeded by insufficient planning, insecurity and the prevailing Naira and fuel shortages. Abuse of incumbency by various political office holders distorted the playing field and there were widespread allegations of vote buying. Media provided an extensive coverage of the three leading campaigns, while disinformation interfered with voters’ right to make an informed choice on election day. The EU EOM is continuing its observation of the ongoing collation and tabulation of results throughout the country.

    INEC’s operational capacity was hampered by the ongoing fuel and Naira shortage. Insecurity prevented it from accessing some Local Government Areas (LGAs), notably in the South. Attacks on INEC premises, including just days before polling, hindered preparations in affected areas, while instilling fear in voters. Overall, stakeholders had expressed confidence in INEC’s independence, professionalism, and voter information efforts, but this decreased ahead of elections. INEC lacked efficient planning and transparency during critical stages of the electoral process, while on election day trust in INEC was seen to further reduce due to delayed polling processes and information gaps related to much anticipated access to results on its Results Viewing Portal (IReV).

    In the lead-up to elections, the widely welcomed Electoral Act 2022 introduced measures aimed at building stakeholder trust, however leaving some important gaps in terms of accountability and INEC’s power to enforce the law. Weak points include a lack of INEC empowerment to enforce sanctions for electoral offences and breaches of campaign finance rules. Positively, INEC benefited from more timely financing than for previous contests. Other new provisions also aimed to enhance transparency of results.

    The introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the IReV for the 2023 elections was perceived as an important step to ensure the integrity and credibility of elections. However, delayed training of technical personnel, an inadequate mock testing exercise, and a lack of public information on the election technologies diminished expectations and left room for speculation and uncertainty.

    During the early stages of collation, presidential result forms from polling units were not displayed on the IReV, while Senate and House of Representative results were slowly published. Presidential election result forms started to be uploaded after 10 pm on election day, raising concerns and reaching only 20 per cent by noon on 26 February. Later the same evening, INEC explained the delay with “technical hitches.”

    Among 93.4 million registered voters, 9.5 million additional voters were registered ahead of the 2023 polls, of whom two-thirds were youth following mobilisation efforts during the registration period. Yet, the collection of permanent voter cards (PVC), a requirement to vote, was negatively affected by poor institutional planning. Two days before elections, INEC stated that 93.3 per cent of PVCs were collected. Without an independent audit of the voter register, quality and inclusiveness could not be assured.

    Following contentious candidate registration processes there were18 contestants for the presidential office and over 4200 for 461 national assembly seats. They were selected in party primaries that reportedly lacked transparency and inclusiveness, marked by very chronically low levels of participation of women and youth. This compounded an overall stark lack of legal measures for inclusion and barriers to participation which do not align with international standards.

    The conduct of contesting parties and candidates, as well as some gaps in the law, led to a spate of pre- election court cases, with some matters not finalised ahead of elections. During the pre-election period, EU EOM interlocutors criticised various court rulings for being too technical, some leading to belated primary re-runs, others to substitutions of perceived legitimate candidates, thereby eroding public trust, exposing intra-party conflicts, and contributing to a volatile campaign environment.

    The campaign was highly competitive, and contestants conducted rallies nationwide, but the Naira cash and fuel scarcity reduced activities and attendance. Political parties denounced unequal campaign conditions due to interference of opponent governors. Reports of vote and PVC buying were also frequent. Internal party conflicts weakened the presidential campaigns of PDP and APC with personal accusation obscuring issue-based messages shortly before the elections. There was a lack of prosecution of electoral offences and a significant increase in violent incidents closer to elections, including attacks on candidates, reportedly, aimed to disturb the elections and suppress voter participation, particularly in the South-East.

    Media offered an extensive campaign coverage, despite economic hardships, institutional pressures, and electoral violence. Prime-time newscasts focused on the Naira swap, and APC and PDP animosities, granting both parties equitable exposure, although mostly negative in tone. Politicians used polarising rhetoric on air and conspiracy theories, originating online, were frequently discussed in the most popular talk shows. Analytical reporting on party policies was scant. Lead contestants could not be compared directly, as APC and PDP rebuffed presidential debates, undermining voters’ right to an informed choice.

    Social media was actively used by political actors as a campaign tool. However, the platforms were misused to spread harmful content, including disinformation on key electoral processes; the measures the platforms took to protect electoral integrity were insufficient. Misleading information also came from political actors and contributed to a blurred information environment for voters.

    Online and offline media joined forces with civil society and fact checkers to safeguard the integrity of the pre-election information environment. Real-time fact checking of gubernatorial and other contestants’ debates strived to hold candidates accountable, while various formats of voter information, raised voter awareness and helped to counter electoral insecurity, complementing INEC efforts.

    Civil society organisations observed and scrutinised different aspects of the election, issued several pre- election reports, at times probing INEC’s operational preparedness, offering voters a non-partisan assessment of election preparations. Over 144,800 citizen observers monitored election day proceedings.