Tag: Francis Ewherido

  • Tribute to my brother, Senator Pius Ewherido – By Francis Ewherido

    Tribute to my brother, Senator Pius Ewherido – By Francis Ewherido

    Today makes it exactly 10 years since my brother slipped through our fingers and left for the great beyond. Today, I reminiscence on some of the magical years, especially the early years, we spent together. It goes back to Ughelli, then Ozoro, Effurun and Warri. At Effurun, he introduced me to reading of newspapers in 1980. When we were in Ozoro in the 70s, my father always bought Daily Times and Nigerian Observer, but I had difficulty reading them. I would see a headline, “FG…” Govt….,” or SMC…” I did not know the meaning of the abbreviations and acronyms; they were not part of the English we were taught in school, so they were not in my vocabulary.

    In 1980, we relocated to Effurun. That was when my brother started buying newspapers and tasking all of us to save money for newspapers. Newspapers were between 20 kobo to 50 kobo then (I am not sure anymore). He was the one who rekindled my interest in reading of newspapers and helped me to cross the hurdles of the acronyms and abbreviations: FG, GOVT, and SMC. He was obsessed with the National Concord. On Sundays, he bought New Nigeria Newspaper because of Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah (then Rev. Fr. Matthew Hassan Matthew Kukah). He was a firebrand columnist and my brother loved his column. He would send my younger brothers out as early as 6am to 7am to wait for the vendor. Concord was hot cake then and you could only get it if you came early. In the case of New Nigeria, few copies were sent to the Effurun-Warri axis. It was printed in Kaduna and was generally seen as a Northern Newspaper. Arguably, only Kukah’s column made many people to buy the paper on Sundays in our part of Bendel State (present Edo and Delta States) to the best of my knowledge.

    It was also during this time that his interest in politics became apparent. He followed the events of the second republic diligently until it was truncated by the Buhari/Idiagbon coup on December 31, 1983. His interest in newspapers spurred mine and made me to opt for Mass Communication when I wanted to write JAMB exam in 1983, but there was a problem. Only four universities offered Mass Communication: University of Nigeria, Nsukka, University of Lagos, University of Maiduguri and Bayero University, Kano. All were considered too far from home. The only university my father was comfortable with was the University of Lagos, his alma mater, but there was a snag. It only admitted direct entry students for Mass Comm. I did not want to spend two years doing A’ Levels. So my brother advised me to choose Theatre Arts, which he explained to me was close to Mass Comm, in the University of Benin. I did and scored 279. My name was second on the list, but I was denied admission because I did “not write English Literature in JAMB Exam.”

    I was devastated and temporarily relocated from Effurun to the village where my father was the school principal. I did not come back to Effurun until after I finished writing JAMB Exam in 1984. This time around, I reasoned with my brother that it must be Mass Comm, my initial choice. I chose Mass Comm, UNN. UNN was dreaded then because the competition to get admission to UNN, especially Law, Mass Comm, Accounting, Medicine and Pharmacy, was stiff, but I was encouraged by my 279 score in JAMB in 1983. My brother was also there encouraging me. I wrote JAMB again in 1984 choosing Mass Comm, UNN. I scored 284 and my name was fourth on the list. That was how I started my journey in the media world before adding insurance and other endeavours.

    Meanwhile, my brother also did not get admission to study law at Uniben, so he left for Ife to study philosophy where he emerged the best graduating student in his class. He went back to Uniben later to get a degree in law. We believed we were denied admission partly due issues my father had with someone, but that is in the past. Law was always his first choice and philosophy was second. He was preparing to do a master’s degree in Philosophy at the time he died.

    During our stay in the university, we compared UNN and Ife. I said UNN was better academically. He was not really interested in being drawn into that argument, but he was emphatic that Ife was more beautiful. There was no basis for comparism. UNN was not even beautiful then. We exchanged letters regularly and compared notes. During holidays, we (himself, Ufuoma, my immediate younger brother and myself) would coil up in bed and talk about the future. We discussed our plans, dreams and aspirations. There was a burning desire to uplift the family name and circumstances.

    When my father died suddenly in 1988, he jettisoned his plan to take the offer of a graduate assistant at Ife, by virtue of being the best graduating student, and using the opportunity to pursue his master’s degree. My father had set a target of minimum first degree for all his children. Three of my youngest brothers were still in secondary school. He felt that everyone had to get their first degree first in line with my father’s wish. Not only that, the salary of a graduate assistant was N500. He felt that he would not be a participant, but a bystander, in the education of his younger siblings with that salary. He opted to do audio/video business to enable him earn more income. The business did very well and enabled him not only to support our youngest siblings, but boost the entire family’s finances. Later when he went into politics and became the deputy speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly in 1999, his distractors called him “ordinary DJ” and “disc jockey.” I was very pained and amused at the same time. They did not know the sacrifice he made for my family. Ignorance is a disease, and ignorance of history is a tragedy.

    Much later, when my personal life was in disarray, my brother saw my despair. He intervened and linked me up with my wife. We are in the 25th year of marriage. Continue to rest in peace. I will love and cherish you all my life. Continue to rest in the bosom of the Lord.

  • Belated happy Father’s Day to real fathers – By Francis Ewherido

    Belated happy Father’s Day to real fathers – By Francis Ewherido

    Last Sunday was Father’s Day. It is belated, but well-wishes can never be late. So, Happy Father’s Day. I read some comments on social media where some people were complaining about the qualifying of some Happy Father’s Day posts with Adjectives like “real” and “good.” Why are they complaining? Who is a father? Is it just a man who impregnated a woman? So because a woman carried a pregnancy, she is a mother? Did the baby suck her breasts? After abandoning him/her at birth, she comes 25 years later to claim she is the mother? I beg clear road make I pass. Fatherhood goes with concomitant responsibilities?

    Real or good fathers need all the best wishes in the world. It is not easy to be a good father in today’s challenging world. Fatherhood goes with continuous and enormous responsibilities. Please allow me to borrow from my lecture notes. One, the father is the leader of his household. To be an effective leader, there are three domains of leadership in which every father must play. They are the ability to lead self, the ability to lead others (wife and children individually) and the ability to lead the family as a unit. Self-leadership, to a great extent, determines your success in the other domains of leadership. Self-leadership involves a deep knowledge of self, a set of morally high values that define who you are, self-control and a commitment to the cause of the family (Willie Petersen). A good father (leader) leads by example, not “do as I as say, but do as I do.” A father walks his talk, he puts his mouth where his money is.

    Also, a father is a teacher. A teacher is someone who imparts knowledge. A father is a teacher, who helps his children to acquire knowledge, competence and virtues. In addition, a father is a mentor to his children. A mentor is a person who gives a younger or less experienced person guidance and advice over a period of time. Teaching is imparting knowledge, mentorship is also imparting knowledge, but with a view to counsel. Every father should be a mentor to his children.

    Bonding is an important part of fatherhood. Every father should intentionally bond with his children to help build a united family. Families bond when they eat together, but there is a shift in paradigm. These days, many families do not often eat together at the table because this “indomie generation” has a different diet from their parents. Also, families scarcely watch television together these days because everyone has a laptop or smartphone. But thankfully many families have WhatsApp groups where the whole family, home and abroad, connect. There is also zoom family meetings. You have to adjust or your family bond will suffer.

    Related to bonding is friendship with your children. It is very difficult to be in your children’s lives without being friends with them. Some fathers have challenges being friends and also enforcing discipline. There is no issue at all. When lions are in protected reserves they are taught early to avoid snakes because poisonous snakes kill lions. To do that, they attach a snake-like object to an electric source and simulate snake movement. When the lion attacks the snake-like object, the power source is switched on. The electric shock sends the lion scampering for safety. That way lions learn early in games reserves to avoid snakes. Leadership of your family includes enforcing discipline in the house. Set your boundaries early and let your friendship with your children stay within these boundaries.  Friendship is important for you to get into their world to know their pleasures and displeasures, likes and dislikes, joys and pains, decisions and indecisions; agonies and other challenges they face. Armed with the knowledge of their world, you can play your role of a friend, teacher and mentor better. Let us stop here.

    As said at the beginning, I got to know of this year’s Father’s Day late. Sometimes I forget important dates. I was with my doctor in 2021 when he fixed my next appointment for 9th of March. I had agreed when my wife said “that will not be possible.” I was angry that she overruled me until she spoke again. “That day is his birthday.” That birthday was very important because I really needed to thank God for sparing my life after a very difficult period.

    Happily, my wife remembered Father’s Day and fervently prayed for me. It meant a lot to me. She always remembers important dates and buys me gifts. But there was no gift this year and I am not complaining o! I have no right to complain. Apart from forgetting important dates, I am not a habitual gift buyer, so what right have I to complain?  It is a terrible trait that I am ashamed of. Or is it because I am not romantic? I have never bought flowers for her, except the bouquet of flowers during our wedding. Before marriage, I never bought any girl flowers, not even on Valentine’s Day. It is not for lack of awareness. Giving flowers is alien to me.

    A few years ago, a woman complained to me that her husband is unromantic during our counselling session. I was upfront with her that I am even guiltier. But I admonished her husband not copy my bad behaviour. He should be romantic. He has money, so he should spoil his wife with gifts, take her out on candlelight dinners and take her on romantic vacations. I scarcely travel without my wife. That is just natural to me, but are those trips within and outside Nigeria romantic vacations? My wife is in a better position to answer that question, but I just love being with her.

    During my 40th birthday celebration long ago, I publicly confessed that I am very unromantic. My mischievous friend challenged my wife on how she could agree with me that I am unromantic when she was heavily pregnant with our youngest son. Ability to impregnate your wife is not the same with being romantic. I know what being romantic is, that is why I know that I am not romantic. After my session with the young couple, I decided that I must practice what I counsel (romance). After a few trials, what happened to David when Saul kitted him with coat of armour and a bronze helmet on his head to fight Goliath happened to me; I was not real.  Like David I now rely on my sling and smooth stones: caring. It has helped to keep my marriage going for over 24 years now. I take consolation that I am caring, though I am not romantic.

    But to other husbands, there is no harm in being romantic and caring at the same time. To Urhobo men and some other Niger Delta men whose ethnicity I don’t want to mention, help to puncture that stereotype that we are not romantic. Don’t allow few bad apples like me mess up the entire basket.

    Finally, a father must love his wife. It is not only a biblical injunction, it teaches your sons how to be loving husbands in future.

  • Speaker Abbas and the burden of polygamy – By Francis Ewherido

    Speaker Abbas and the burden of polygamy – By Francis Ewherido

    Many Nigerians watched in shock and/or amusement as the two wives of the new speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Tajudeen Abbas were shoving each other in a battle for supremacy during the swearing in of their husband as the speaker of the 10th House of Representatives. It was not a pretty and comfortable sight.

    I do not know why, but I have always felt that only “strong” men should go into polygamy. I mean strong men in all ramifications: maintaining discipline on the home front, being able to satisfy all your wives sexually, being able to provide for all your wives and their children, etc. If you cannot, it better you marry only one wife. That is not to say there are no squabbles in monogamous homes, but there is no rivalry between wives because there is one wife. Besides my Christian faith, that is the other reason I am not a polygamist. I no get power to manage two or more women.

    I knew from an early age that I could manage only one wife. Realising my “weakness” early in life gave me a clear sense of direction. My father was a monogamist, but I did experience polygamy from afar, from neighbours and relatives. There were polygamous homes where there was law and order, and others that were like Armageddon: Half-siblings fought and injured each other, wives fought to finish. One wife bit the nipples of another wife. Another one almost bit off an ear of her co-wife. One strong wife beat up her husband mercilessly for taking sides with the other wife.

    But in the polygamous homes where there was law and order, discipline was palpable. Every wife knew her place in the hierarchy. Sometimes, seniority determined the place of the wives. In some other homes, it was based on favouritism. The amebo is the favourite wife, while avwiorovwen is the less favoured wife. amebo can spend a month with the husband, before the avwiorovwen gets a couple of days with the husband. I remember one particular avwiorovwen who was close to my mother. She could go for months without “seeing” her husband. Once her husband gave her the nod, she would gladly inform my mother that her husband had allocated “time” for her.

    I am informed that Islam does not encourage favouritism in polygamy. To marry more than one wife, you must have the capacity to love all the wives and treat them equally. I do not know how it works. Speaker Abass is a Muslim. He has to find a way to instil discipline on the home front and avoid allowing domestic squabbles to spill into the public space. He has many official functions to perform in his time as speaker. Thunder must not be allowed to strike at the same place again.

    What happened was a blight, but it will soon be forgotten because of the pace at which we are seeing breaking news. But there must never be a breaking news over Abbas’ domestic squabbles spilling into the public space again. Abass was elected to manage a 360-Member House of Reps. It is an enormous task and I believe his colleagues who elected him believe he has the capacity to carry out the task with distinction. But charity must begin at home by managing his two wives well.

    It is not as if monogamists do not have their own challenges or similar challenges. Not all monogamists can provide for their wives financially or satisfy their wives sexually. I have said it several times here that I have problems with polygamy. It is part of our culture, heritage and religion of some of us. I just do not subscribe to it. That’s all.  But I believe that those going into polygamy must be equal to the task. From my personal experience as a monogamist, managing one wife is heavy luggage. Additional wives means additional luggage. That is my view as an outsider.

    BUKAYO SAKA

    After the 2022-2023 English Premier League season ended, the first (I guess) port of call for Nigerian-born Arsenal Attacking winger, Bukayo Saka, was Lagos, Nigeria. After the photos of his arrival at the airport surfaced online, the next photos of his were in the streets of Bariga, Lagos. I am not sure of the connection, but some sources said his grandparents lived there and his father probably grew up there. We also saw his photos with his paternal grandparents in his state of origin, Kwara State. It was obvious that he came to connect with his roots.

    He also visited an orphanage in Lagos suburbs, but the video that touched me most was his visit to the National Stadium, Surulere. He met the youngsters playing football. They were apparently awe-struck and happy to see him. They shook hands and took selfies with him. Do you know the significance of that visit? From among those youngsters, new Sakas can arise, challenged and inspired by this visit. “So Saka is human after all. I am even bigger than he is. If he can do it, I too can,” a few might say to themselves.

    From the football pitch, he went to the section where physically challenged athletes were training. They were overjoyed to see him. He also shook hands and gladly took selfies with them. Their joy was palpable. As I watched the video, the question that came to my mind was, how much does it really cost to put smiles on people’s faces and spread joy? Sometimes, it costs absolutely nothing. Saka might have donated sports kits and cash gifts. The kits would become too old and be discarded someday, and the cash will not last forever. That is even if some of them have not finished spending theirs. But the joy he gave them and the memories will linger on.

    By the way, some people were asking why he was taking photos in Bariga and not highbrow Ikoyi, Victoria Island and Banana Island. If you know Saka since he broke out in Arsenal, his common traits are humility, being real and down to earth. Former Arsenal Captain, Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, said that much when Saka was just breaking out in Arsenal.

    Saka was clear-headed when coming to Nigeria: to connect with his roots and give back to society. He did not come to show the world that Nigeria has many beautiful places. Saka is thoroughbred, focused, humble and levelheaded. He will go places. His parents did a great job. Go Saka; go, boy. Thanks for coming. Go back and tell the other players that you guys need to work harder to win the league in the 2023-24 season. It will not be easy to displace Manchester City and keep the rest of the pack behind us, but it is doable. After all, we are gunners.

  • Is it 6 or 9? – By Francis Ewherido

    Is it 6 or 9? – By Francis Ewherido

    Is the number 6 or 9? Do not rush to answer the question. There are some variables involved. From where are you looking at the number? What is your mind-set? These will determine whether it is 6 or 9. Even if from your position you see 6, you must also realise that if you were looking at the figure from the opposite direction, it would be 9. This ability is called empathy, seeing things from the point of view of others, even if you do not agree with them. It is the absence of empathy that is tearing many marriages to shreds today.

    On Wednesday, I saw a video of a popular couple arguing in the bathroom (what is a camera doing in the bathroom of a married couple?). I am not sure if it is real or a stunt to get publicity and trend. They are actors, so anything is possible. But the issues in the video are common in many marriages, so that is our interest today. The husband said the wife made a mistake but refused to own up to her mistake. The wife, on the other hand, could not see any mistake she had made that she should own up to. The argument degenerated into threats that we shall come to shortly. But I can see two scenarios. One, the man was seeing 6 from his position, while the woman was seeing 9 from her position. If you are dealing with facts, it is easy to adjudicate on such arguments. White is white and black is black; no arguments.

    But when the argument is based on opinions and perspectives, it is difficult. Long ago, I was in the UK for my youngest brother’s graduation. After the graduation, there was a get-together. In the course of the interaction, his school mate, a young lady told me: “Francis, don’t be silly.” From the corner of my eyes, I saw my brother recoil in shock. In the family, where we grew up, you cannot tell an older person “don’t be silly.” But I understood these were oyibo children and simply took it in my strides. Imagine that we were in a marriage where the only perspective I understood was, you must show maximum respect to your husband, I would have considered her utterance disrespectful and there could have been mayhem. But what happened here? I empathised. I understood that in her culture, it is not out of place to say, “don’t be silly, dad.” In one sentence, I saw 6, but also empathised to know that she was seeing 9.

    However, I also know that some spouses would rather die or tell lies than accept the fact that they are wrong. How can white be called black? But this is not unusual in some marriages. The other spouse just has to see it as one of the crosses he/she must bear and live with it? Or do you want to make your home a war zone or end your marriage? There are husbands and wives who would never accept that they are wrong and never apologise. It is very irritating, but that is what it is. May be they would turn a new leaf someday, which would be wonderful, but do not bank on it. Long ago, I said in an article on this column: in marriage that only one spouse changes. That spouse is you. It is within your power to change, but you cannot change your spouse. It is his/her decision to make. If in doubt, ask those who have been married for 20, 30, 40 or even 50 years.

    I also heard the husband telling the wife that this was not the plan at the beginning. In other words, the wife shifted the goalpost after the football match had started. He did not disclose the plan they had. It suffices to say that shifting the goalpost is one of the reasons for problems and collapse of many marriages. My wife and I were sponsors of Mr. and Mrs. Onoriode Barovbe when they got married last Saturday. During the exchange of wedding vows, I listened carefully as if I was the one exchanging the vows: “So that you may assume the duties of marriage in mutual and lasting fidelity.” “Have you come here freely and without reservation to give yourselves to each other in marriage?” “I promise to be true to you in good times and bad, in sickness and in health, I will love you and honour you all the days of my life.” “What God has joined, men must not divide.” Now compare the vows and what obtains in marriages. Why will marriages not be troubled or breakup when the goalpost is shifted with impunity?

    The other thing I noticed was the man threatening his wife. I do not know why spouses issue threats in marriage. It is not advisable. To a large extent, spouses, especially those who have been together for long, know each other so much that one spouse can bring down the other or they can bring down each other. Many years ago, a banker had a flourishing career. By age 30, he was already a senior manager. He had issues with the estranged wife and they could not reconcile their differences. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” She spilled the beans on him at his bank. He was sacked and a very promising career came crashing down like a pack of cards. Even if you decide to part ways as a couple, part in peace not pieces.

    Finally, the husband threatened retaliation because the wife was doing a video that she intended to post online. True to her threat, the wife posted the video (the one in question) in retaliation for the video the husband posted earlier on the wife without her approval. So when will this retaliation end? Whether it is stage managed or real, my impression is that these people might be adults, but they are immature. They also do not understand the institution called matrimony.

    I know that having a large followership on social media is now big business, but you cannot live your married life on social media. You better look for other contents to feed your followers. Marriage is a private matter and too many cooks certainly spoil the broth. Now followers are going to express varying opinions. Even unmarried people would want to give us lectures on marriage. I said it some time ago, but some unmarried people did not like it: I reiterate, marriage is not theory, it is practical.

    Once, they brought a menu card to me in London. I was happy to see jollof rice in the menu and I ordered it. Just one spoonful and I abandoned it. This was not a case of Nigerian jollof or Ghana jollof competition. It tasted anything but jollof rice. I later found out it was prepared by a Caribbean chef. Have you not eaten meals that tasted blank but when they were being prepared, the aroma filled everywhere. That a meal smells fine does not mean it will also taste fine. You have to eat it to know. That is why marriage is a lived experience.

  • Life is fragile; handle yours with care – By Francis Ewherido

    Life is fragile; handle yours with care – By Francis Ewherido

    In the last one week, I heard of some deaths that made me to be circumspect. Two of the people died as a result of overindulgence. We always joke that “something must kill a man” and laugh over it. But I also grew up to hear my mother say that “the stick that you see should not pierce your eye.” It is really annoying when doctors warn you to stop a habit because of the negative effects on your organs, yet you continue to indulge in it because you are “addicted” to what is killing you. Some argue that addiction itself is a sickness, but let us also accept the fact that there is a deficit of self-control and willpower. Let us quit being selfish? What about your spouse, children, siblings, aged parents, other relatives, loved ones and friends, don’t their feelings and the effect that your death would have on them matter?

    Two other deaths touched me. One of them was prominent in his small circle, but the last person and certainly not the least, Chief Raymond Dokpesi, was a very prominent Nigerian, a man of many paths. “When beggars die, there are no comets seen; the heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes,” Shakespeare wrote in Julius Caesar. The other people who died within the period were no beggars. They were prominent men in their own rights. But Dokpesi was a big fish and comets were seen. In 1987 when I was a cub/student reporter in The Punch, Dokpesi was already a prominent man and one of those who made parties thick in the Lagos social circle. He was the toast of musicians at parties. Sunny Ade even mentioned him in one song. But perhaps he is most renowned for his pioneering efforts in the private ownership of electronic media in Nigeria. He established RayPower FM Radio Station and later African Independent Television (AIT). Dokpesi died in a domestic accident, we are told, at 71. May his soul and those of the others rest in peace.

    Sometimes, it looks like when death comes calling, there is no hiding place. In those days, a man was sleeping in the afternoon in his own bedroom when an articulated truck veered off the road, rammed into his house and killed him. But are we going to say that we shall no longer travel because of road accidents, plane crashes or boat mishaps? Of course, no. It is in that regard that I am encouraging everyone who can afford an annual medical check up to go ahead and do so. That death will come when it wants to come does not mean we should not take our health serious anymore. Annual check-ups go for about a hundred thousand naira (N100,000) and above depending on the scope. You can also stagger your check-up over a period and start with areas that need immediate attention with as little as N15,000. I know some people will dismiss me. Life is tough, they will say. People are looking for money to eat and he is talking about medical check-up.

    I know times are hard. I feel it too, so I can empathise. But I also know that the kidney failures, stroke, cancer, organ failure and some of the illnesses that are killing people could have been prevented if the problem was diagnosed early. For those suffering from these ailments, but are still alive, what we are talking about now is not N15,000 for one diagnosis or N100,000 for annual check-ups, but millions of naira being spent on treatment and management of the condition, and there are no guarantees. Save from the money you spend on indulgencies and take care of your health. I am not here to dictate to you how to live your life, but to remind you that you must be alive to live your life. Our lives are in God’s hands and even after these check-ups, there is still no guarantee. But at least play your part.

    The beauty of annual check-up is that it gives you peace of mind. It also forewarns you of impending health challenges if not nipped at the bud. I actually did mine a few weeks ago. The results are what took me to my doctor and prompted me to write today’s article. There are two issues I need to nip at the bud. Thank God I know early. Annual check-up is like an examination result. You can do excellently well generally, yet perform poorly in a subject or two. If you perform poorly or fail in critical subjects like English and Mathematics (issues with heart, liver, kidney and other organs), there is a problem and you have to deal with it.

    Annual medical checkup is a necessity once you clock 40. As I wrote a few years ago, “the checkups recommended by medical practitioners include: physical examination, visual examination, blood sugar level, Lipid profile, Liver function test, electrolyte, full blood count, urinalysis, prostate specific antigen (men above 40yrs), Chest x-ray (above 40yrs), prostate scan(Men above 50yrs), ECG (those above 40yrs), colonoscopy (men above 50yrs), mammography (for women above 40yrs) and some other tests. Each of these procedures serves a particular purpose. Chest x-ray, for instance, is meant to show the state of your lungs. Chest x-rays can detect heart-related lung problems, cancer, infections like tuberculosis and pneumonia or air collecting in the space around a lung, among others. Blood sugar level is for all persons 40 years and above, especially people from families where there is a history of diabetes. In fact, such persons should have been doing their checks long before 40 years. Normal blood sugar level is between 70 and 99 fasting (that is when you wake up in the morning) and not more than 140 two hours after a meal at all times.” As a rule, you should have your glucometer (blood sugar measuring machine) and monitor your sugar level regularly if you are diabetic or pre-diabetic.

    If you have high blood pressure, owning and using a sphygmomanometer (blood pressure monitor) regularly is a must. High blood pressure is regarded as a silent killer and it is true, but checking it regularly can stop stroke from creeping on you like a thief in the night. Not all strokes result from high blood pressure, but, at least, reduce the risk of stroke resulting from high blood pressure.

    Exercise is very important, but be careful as you grow older. Many people have died while exercising. I was very sad to learn that Dokpesi died as a result of a “fall on his treadmill during a routine gym exercise.” About five years ago, I wrote: Beyond your physician, let your body, be your guide, before you slump and die prematurely. If you go to the National Stadium in Lagos, you will see some sexagenarians and septuagenarians jogging, while people in their 30s are walking. It is partly because of the instructions from their bodies. Some of those old men jogging have been doing it religiously for over 40 years. Exercise you must, but listen to your bodies.

  • No man is immune, but… – By Francis Ewherido

    No man is immune, but… – By Francis Ewherido

    During a recent television interview that featured music superstar, Innocent Dibia (2Baba) and his actress wife, Annie Dibia, 2Baba said men’s penises have minds of their own and a man might not be in control of the actions of the penis.  He also said that a man can have sex with a woman he is not emotionally attached to. He is in it strictly for the sex. Annie was upset and embarrassed. She asked 2Baba to clarify, “Are you talking generally or yourself? Is that you or is that your belief?” 2Baba replied, “It’s what I believe.” In other, words, that is his opinion. My only problem with him was his saying that before his wife and to her face. I felt that he should have looked for a diplomatic way to handle the question and showed some respect for his wife.

    Some people dragged him on social media and I feel is was unnecessary. The man’s name might be “Innocent,” but he has never pretended to be a saint. Music brought him fame, fortune and the celebrity status, not righteousness. This whole idea of seeing celebrities as superhuman irritates me. Besides the craft which brought them fame and fortune, they are regular human beings like the rest of humankind. If you make him a role model because of his music, you are on the right track. But if you make him a role model in terms of righteous living, it is your problem.

    Some commentators have latched on to 2Baba’s statement that men are wired to have sex with women and they do not need to love these women or have emotional attachment to them. That might be true. There are some men like that, but right from creation, God gave humankind the freedom of choice. Everyone simply chooses what he wants to do. Monogamy and polygamy are choices. Having one sex partner, multiple sex partners or no sex partner are also choices.  You do not need 2Baba or anybody’s opinion to defend your choice or justify your actions.

    Some people who are pro-polygamy make reference to King David and King Solomon who had many wives and concubines to justify their polygamous status. They conveniently ignore the fact that Uriah, whose wife, Bathsheba, David coveted and converted to his wife, was a monogamist during David’s era. While David chose polygamy, Uriah chose monogamy. David made him get drunk so that he could go home and sleep with his wife, but he chose to spend the night with the palace troops.  These were choices. David had no dick control, but Uriah had self-control. These too were choices.

    It is a free world and now people revel in relativism. Make your choices and live with the consequences. There are consequences for whatever choices we make in life. God told David that the child from the adulterous liaison with Bathsheba would die. In spite of the fasting, wearing of sack clothes and sitting on ashes when the child fell it, he died. God also told David that the sword would not depart from his household. It came to pass. His son, Ammon, raped his half-sister, Tamar. Consequently, Absalom killed his half-brother, Ammon for that act. Absalom later rebelled against his father and temporarily drove him from his thrown. To add insult to injury, Absalom slept with David’s concubines before all Israel. At the end, Absalom got killed. These were consequences of David’s actions.

    Uriah also paid the supreme price for refusing to go to his wife, opting to spend the night in the palace. David got him killed in battle and took his wife, Bathsheba, thereafter. There are consequences for our choices. The issue here is to ruminate on the consequences of our choices before making them. The problem we have is thinking we might escape the consequences. Sometimes we do, or so we think. At other times, we pay the price.

    Men’s libido is a monster. That is a fact. Every man has to deal with his libido. Only impotent people are free from the challenge. The issue again is whether you want to tame your monster or you want to allow it roam. Solomon was the wisest king in his time, but be lacked dick control. He had 1000 wives and concubines. There were consequences for his actions. Some of the women turned his heart from God. The jealous God he worshipped would not allow such disloyalty to go unpunished. He spared him, but divided the kingdom during his son’s reign. Ahab was a monogamist, but he was wicked. He also married a wicked wife who refused to take no for an answer. His weakness in putting his wife in check came with consequences.

    The myth that men are naturally polygamous is just what it is, a myth. Each man decides what suits him. In Africa, many men embraced polygamy because the culture allowed and still allows it. Having a large family was also prestigious. It was a symbol of affluence and a large family provided a large labour force in the farm. Today, anybody going for a large family is motivated by different reasons. The richest men in the world today are monogamists with many of them having five or fewer children.

    Men are sight (what they see influences them more than what they hear). That is natural. It is up to everyman to make a choice to see everything and take action, or control himself. In truth, the times are very difficult for men because there are beautiful women in every corner you turn to. But ultimately, you still have a choice to make. When Joseph beheld the beauty of Potiphar’s wife, he knew that if he tarried, he would cave in, so he fled. How many men can survive with a beautiful naked woman if they are alone? Very few. So why allow it get to that stage if you do not want sex.

    Some men, who want to stay faithful to their wives, put themselves under unnecessary pressure. A young man came to me. He had been barely married for a year, but was getting attracted to a junior female colleague. He said he needed help because he was on the verge of tipping over. “How often do you see her?” I asked. He said that they only got to meet in the office. That is a positive sign. Then I asked him if he closes his office door. He responded in the affirmative. “Have you ever seen people having sex in public?” He said no. Why, I asked. He said because there is no privacy. “Simple. Start leaving your office door open and your problem is solved,” I told him. Fidelity and infidelity are choices.  Everyman who wants to stay faithful to his wife must put checks and balances in place. If not, you will fall at some point. Without a deliberate decision to stay faithful and the will power to implement your decision, you stand no chance. Even at that, you need God’s gift of self-control, in addition. I do not know about women, but fidelity is a tough business for men, but it is possible.

  • Wedding anniversary reflections – By Francis Ewherido

    Wedding anniversary reflections – By Francis Ewherido

    Last Monday was my 24th wedding anniversary. When I went into marriage 24 years ago, it was a mystery. Twenty-four years later, I am not close to unravelling the mystery called marriage. I have gained a lot experience as a participant, a counsellor and an observer, but I remain a student. That is why I am quick to correct anyone who calls me a marriage expert. I acknowledge that I have accumulated a body of knowledge on marriage, but I remain a learner.

    Marriage is not an institution where you pound your chest that you have mastered the art. It is an endless sea of water. I see marriage the way I see surfing. Your knowledge of the art and commitment are crucial, but there are other factors outside your control for its success. When Joseph found out that Mary was pregnant with the child Jesus, the marriage was effectively over, but for God’s intervention. I sincerely believe in the God factor in the sustenance of marriage. But there are atheist whose marriages lasted for decades till one spouse died, how did such marriages endure? I do not know. But I know that the God factor has helped to keep my marriage alive.

    Also, no single spouse can pound his/her chest for the success of his/her marriage because only one spouse cannot make a marriage work, no matter how good he/she is. I met a woman who went into marriage with a firm resolve to make it work. She did everything possible to make her marriage work, but it failed. If your spouse wants out, the marriage is as good as over. That is why everyone whose marriage is still on should stay humble. You are only one of the contributory factors; you are not all in all. You cannot look down on others whose marriages failed. Even if you are an atheist, you must acknowledge the contribution of your spouse. Without his/her continuous consent, there will be no marriage. When a 99 year old Italian man filed for divorce of his 96-year-old wife of 77 years, the marriage ended. The wife had an affair over 60 years before, but the man only stumbled on the evidence at that time. When he confronted her, she owned up to the affair. Swiftly, the man filed for divorce.

    In 1998 the 38 years marriage of Frederik Willem de Klerk (last President of apartheid-era South Africa) to his wife, Marike de Klerk, collapsed due to his infidelity. But former US President, Bill Clinton, committed the same adultery, and his wife, Hilary Clinton, forgave him and the marriage lives on till date. I am just trying to drive home the point that some factors that are responsible for your continued married status are beyond you. Clinton was lucky to escape. Notwithstanding, infidelity remains a major reason for marital breakups.

    Money is another major reason why marriages breakup. These days, many girls say on social media that they cannot be in a relationship with a broke man. Money is crucial in marriage, but it is not all in all. The marriage of Bill Gates and Melinda Gates broke up after 27 years together. The same thing happened to Jeff Bezos and MacKenzie Bezos after 25 years of marriage. Both men were at different times the richest men in the world. Yet money did not save their marriages. Marriage is a wonderful institution created by God. I cherish it and at the same time look at it with suspicion and trepidation. It can be so slippery. You have to be permanently on the alert. Inertia can lead to doom.

    Time has flown by in the last 24 years. It makes me to ask if we have actually lived together for 24 years. Facts do not lie. My first generation of children are in their 20s. They were born after marriage, so we are 24 years old in marriage.

    I see marriage as two sides of a coin. The people going into it are good, bad and ugly. They bring all these traits into marriage. A marriage where one or both spouses are totally good is utopian. Such marriages do not exist. Even if they did, I am not sure I will be interested. Conflicts and the unexpected are parts of life and by extension marriage. What is important are mechanisms to resolve conflicts and weather the storm. For me, during conflicts, do not overstep boundaries: I have seen spouses call their other half fool, idiot, agbaya, mumu, short devil and other acidic words. Somehow, they resolve their differences and life goes on. But I am not sure my marriage would endure such acidic words. My wife and I are two strongly opinionated people, so disagreements are inevitable, but knowing each other’s sensitivity, we are careful, but hurtful words, not abuses, do “leak out” sometimes. I know I have said to myself (I dare not say it out because it would make reconciliation more difficult): “wetin sef? Anywhere cloth like, make e tear (let whatever wants to happen, happen). But even as I say it inwardly, I add, “God, na joke I dey o! Forgive me o!”

    I do not belong to the school that makes rules that the sun must not set or dawn meets an unresolved disagreement. I am not mechanical. I dey vex my vex complete, then I carry eraser clean am. Married people should not take critical decisions in the heat of anger. Decisions taken in the heat of anger have ended some marriages. Even when there was window to remedy the situation, pride stood in the way. Sometimes pride for spouse when don see you finish nor make sense to me.

    While growing up, one of the sayings my mother used to mold us was: “you see, in this life if you look in only one direction, your neck will become stiff, so look in all directions.” This has been very useful to me in marriage and in life generally. If you remember only the good things done for you, you are “eserinone (Someone who remembers only today’s good deeds). My wife does get on my nerves and drives me up the wall sometimes (and vice versa). But I never forget that she has stuck to me through thick and thin, in sickness and in health. I read the story of a marriage which broke up recently. The woman’s only reason was that she was tired of the marriage. I went through the same health challenges as her husband and my wife was a rock all through. When I remember her steadfastness, her faith even when I lost faith and thought I would not pull through, letting go becomes easy. I am not perfect, so I expect no perfection from my wife.

    But I still believe forgiveness by spouses should not be taken for granted. Do not cross the red line. That is taking your luck too far. After 24 years, we know the no go areas. They should not be crossed. But every wrongdoing cannot be sacrilege. That is why your core values should be well spelt out at the beginning and in the course of the marriage.

    The last 24 years of marriage have had their share of challenges, but they have been wonderful and fulfilling years. My wife is not perfect, but she is not tradable. Happy 24th wedding anniversary, Peacock.

  • Charity versus frittering away of resources – By Francis Ewherido

    Charity versus frittering away of resources – By Francis Ewherido

    Frittering away of resources versus charity is one of my favourite sub-topics in personal finance in our marriage class. I love it because some of us always mix up charity and frittering away of money. In those days, a woman came to our NGO. She needed money to increase her working capital for her akara (beans cake) business. Her two children were in the university. We supported her with about N5,000, the amount she requested for then.

    Today the children are graduates. Another woman’s daughter got a university admission, but she did not have enough money to send the girl to school. We were willing to support her, but we were concerned about how she would cope after the first semester. She assured us that she would bounce back and subsequently cope with the bills. We gave her the benefit of the doubt and supported her. Today, the young lady is also a graduate.

    Contrast the above cases with a beggar I used to see on Eko Bridge, Lagos, between 1987 and 1994. I saw him after about 15 years later. He had aged and was still begging. There was another beggar on my route to work at Itire Road, Lagos, between 1990 and 1992. About six years ago, I drove through the route. He had aged, but still at the same spot begging. These made me to begin asking myself, what is charity? Dictionary says charity is “the voluntary giving of help, typically in the form of money, to those in need.” So, giving to people in all the above cases qualify as charity. To make today’s topic more meaningful, I am adding “purposeful” to qualify the noun, “charity.” The definition then changes to the voluntary giving of help, typically in the form of money, to those in need with a view to achieving a goal or purpose. 

    In our marriage class, we discuss the many ways that people fritter away money. That is why we termed sub-topic “charity vs frittering away of money.” I will give an example. If you drive into a petrol station and tell a petrol attendant to fill your tank, chances are that the total cost will not be a round figure. For instance, the total cost might be N9,767. If you pay with cash, you might be able to get N250 change, but no more because we do not use kobo coins in our financial transactions. But that is not even the issue. Most of us jump into our cars and drive off without collecting any change. I do not see that act as charity. It is frittering away of money. For a while now we have been battling with occasional scarcity of fuel; is it not the same fuel attendants who have been ripping us off and bringing us untold hardship? Has anyone of them reciprocated your kind gesture of leaving your change with them? Do they deserve this “charity” or tips, as many of us see it?

    I used to leave my change with female fuel attendants. I felt that was my way of encouraging them for working hard to earn a living instead of using their bodies to make money. But I stopped after a female attendant ripped me off, of about N2,500. She manipulated the fuel pump. I did not realize until I saw the final bill after my tank was filled up. I do not know what annoyed me more: the N2,500 I lost or the fact that she caught me mugu (outsmarted me). Anyway, there are more female fuel attendants now, so they do not need my encouragement. Unemployment, with the fear of hunger, is enough push.

    Before I stray too far, let us go back to today’s topic: Charity versus frittering away of resources.  For some time now, my conscience kept pricking me. After leaving the church on Sundays or while in traffic, beggars flock around me begging for money. Depending on my mood, I oblige or ignore them. When I oblige I feel I frittered money away, but take solace in the fact that this N100 or N200 cannot do any damage to my economy. But as time went on, I kept seeing the same faces over and over again begging. It is their trade. They have no interest in being gainfully employed. Many times government has rounded them up and relocated them to their home states 100s of miles away. In no time, they find their way back. Some have been put in rehabilitation centres and given vocational training. Some escape from these centres while others return to begging after receiving training. 

    These beggars are everywhere in cities. At pedestrian crossings and some public places in Lagos, they have taken over and become a big nuisance. If you go to a street like Kano Street in Ebute Metta, Lagos, they have been there for decades. Begging has become a generational inheritance. The current beggars are probably children of the beggars 30 years ago. It is possible their grandparents were there 50 or 60 years ago. They are organized and can be very violent. They have fought government officials who tried to relocate and teach them a trade. They add no value to themselves or the society. How do you break the cycle of poverty, illiteracy and the beggarly orientation in their lineage? Does it make sense giving professional beggars money?

    Giving money to beggars might be charity, according to the dictionary definition, but I also believe in Apostle Paul’s admonition that those who are capable and able to work, but decide to be idle should go hungry (2 Thessalonians 3:7–9).

    I have since lost interest in purposeless and aimless charity. If you donate the N200 to a charity organisation and aggregate it with donations from other givers, it can take willing children from less privileged background through tertiary institutions or support them to learn a trade. The beneficiaries do not need to know or acknowledge you, the fulfilment you get, knowing that the little you contributed has made  someone an engineer, a medical doctor, a banker, a computer expert, etc., is immeasurable. 

    I used to do prison visitations. There are awaiting trial inmates who need only N5,000 to be released. I have taken a firm decision. I might still give beggars money once in a while if the spirit moves me, but I am done with aimless charity as a habit. Rather, let my N200 build men, women and make our society a better place.

    Unfortunately, there are some beggars who are just trying to raise capital to start a trade. But how do you distinguish them from professional beggars? That is why it is not wise to shut the door totally on giving money to beggars. The only professional beggars you can identify are those on a route that you ply regularly over time.

    There is the story of a good, a Good Samaritan, no, Nigerian, who raised over N1m to take a beggar off the street, but she came back because she is a professional beggar and begging is business. I nor get time for that kind beggar again.

  • Daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law need to be sensible – By Francis Ewherido

    Daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law need to be sensible – By Francis Ewherido

    The relationship between daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law is amoebic; it is a universal variable that differs from one case to the other. I am trying to avoid the use of the adjective “problematic” in describing the relationship because it not. The real problem are human beings who complicate simple issues. Stereotyping is one of the unhelpful ways to deal with this relationship: Daughters-in-law are controlling, selfish, lousy cooks, spiteful, domineering, aggressive, poor in parenting, attention seekers, spendthrifts, etc. Mothers-in-law, on the other hand, are witches, wicked, domineering, influencing their sons; in fact, life is better without mothers-in-law, etc.

    My mind travelled back to about 1991 when a female friend told me: “Francis, to tell you the truth, most girls would prefer their to-be mothers-in-law dead before they meet their prospective husbands.” Since I have not carried out a survey to verify my friend’s assertion, let me assume it is a hyperbole. But if any woman reading this article has such a mind-set, this is my wish for you: Africa adores male children, so may God bless you with male children. Amen. Since you want your potential mother-in-law dead before you marry your husband, may you also die before your sons get married! If you refuse to say amen, stop wishing your fellow woman, you have not even met, premature death.

    The daughter-in-law versus mother-in-law matters are not things you can talk about in a vacuum, so let us look at a few scenarios: A mother wants to test the girl her son wants to marry to see if she is hardworking. She brings out all the clothes in the house for her to wash. If she fails, she is lazy and not a good wife material. My take on this is, this test is out of tune with modern times. Your son might even have a washing machine and dry-cleans his suits and other delicate clothing items. Moreover, hard work goes beyond brawn. Some girls are intellectually hardworking which sometimes trumps physical strength.

    Again, a mother-in-law visits her son and his family and she is going out with the family to church or social event, where should she sit in the car? She sits in the back seat. The front seats are for husband and wife, just as a king sits with his queen. It was so before she came visiting? Why displace her because it is your “son’s car?” The king’s mother does not displace or replace the queen. If she is present at a ceremony, a special place is created for her. The owner’s corner behind is that special place in this case. If the wife voluntarily decides to yield the front seat to her mother-in-law, it is a different matter.

    As for the wife, if you marry a rich man from a humble background, he has an obligation to uplift the family he came from. The wife should encourage her husband to do that. If her husband is providing adequately for her and the children, why try to stop him from taking care of his parents and trying to set up his younger siblings? I have heard a woman complain that her husband is spending so much on “his family” instead of accumulating wealth for her children. That is very selfish and inconsiderate. We are talking about immediate needs, you are talking about accumulating wealth to safeguard the future of your children. What is the good education and upbringing you are giving to your children meant for? Is it not for them to chart a great future for themselves? We can go on and on with examples, but let us conserve space.

    To forestall conflicts between these two sets of women, prior steps can be taken. One of the things a young girl must do during courtship is to know the family she is marrying into. It is very important because in Africa, you do not marry only your husband, you marry into the family. Knowing the family should guide you to decide whether or not you want to continue with the relationship. It helps you to know the value orientation and modus operandi of the family, especially his mother. You then decide whether or not you want to be part of such a family. But this is no guarantee because negative changes can occur after marriage, making hitherto friendly relationship toxic.

    Also, women should realise that it is very difficult for you to marry your husband and isolate him from his family (parents, siblings and relatives). In fact I drive it into my children’s head and other young people around me that any potential spouse who wants to separate you from the family you came from is evil. Rather, he/she should become part of the family and embrace them. If that is not possible, the minimum is to tolerate them. I am totally against disrespecting your spouse’s family. If you are having issues with a member of your spouse’s family, inform your spouse to deal with it. Do not resort to disrespect.

    On the other hand, husbands, especially, should realise that one of his major roles is to protect his wife against external aggression and this includes aggression from his family members. I have used this example before. In the early beginnings of a friend of mine in the 90s, his mother came around. Usually, my friend took eba and soup in the morning and for dinner. He ate before going to work. When he came back from work, he settled down to eat the same food again but noticed that the taste of the soup had changed. He summoned his wife: Bridget, I ate this soup this morning, what happened? The wife responded that mama said the soup was not tasty enough and added salt and other measures to make it taste better. My friend was livid. He called his mother and told her the most you should done have was change the taste of her own portion, not the entire pot of soup.

    This brings me to the next point, the man of the house (husband and son) is very critical to creating a harmonious and peaceful relationship between his wife and his mother. He must be firm, fair and just. But in doing this, he has to be diplomatic. That his wife is in the wrong does not mean he should humiliate her before his mother and vice versa. He needs wisdom to navigate through. I always say that it, it is not compulsory for your mother and wife to be friends. What is compulsory is that they are mother-in-law and daughter-in-law because one is your mother and the other is your wife. Mutual respect is very important. Do not take sides with the offender for any reason. What is wrong is wrong. If they are bent on living like cat and dog, put them in watertight compartments so that you can have your peace of mind. But this is not easy to keep them apart as it used to be when you could stop communication through avoiding physical interaction. Now a simple phone call can cause friction between them. Latent interference {Latent interference – Francis Ewherido – Vanguard News (vanguardngr.com)} has become easy with advancement in communication (mobile phones, emails, WhatsApp, etc. But you have to find a way to deal with their conflicts before someone sends you to premature death.

    Wives and mothers play/played a unique role in the life of a man (husband/son). The roles are unique because they cannot be switched. These roles must therefore be mutually respected and acknowledged. A mother-in-law should not see a daughter-in-law as her caretaker or someone who wants to reap where she did not sow. Also a daughter-in-law should not see the mother-in-law as an actress who has completed her role and must now quit the stage. Both mind sets are wrong and unhelpful.

  • I stand with Achraf Hakimi Mouh – By Francis Ewherido

    I stand with Achraf Hakimi Mouh – By Francis Ewherido

    PSG player and Moroccan International, Achraf Hakimi Mouh and his Tunisian-Libyan-Spanish wife, Hiba Aboukare are on the verge of a divorce.  Hakimi has been in the news for a while now because of his separation and pending divorce from Hiba, and the rape allegation against him. Two Fridays ago, the news broke that much Hakimi’s $17m net worth is in his mother’s name. Meanwhile, Hiba wants at least $8.5m (50per cent of Hakimi’s networth) in divorce settlement. Hiba only got to know after filing for divorce that she will not get that much. I even read that with a networth of $2m, Hiba is officially richer than Hakimi and would be the one to pay him divorce settlement. Anyway, I doubt if Hakimi would be interested in her money.

    Opinions have been divided since the new development became public knowledge. Some people are taking side with him and his mother, Saida Mouh, while others are taking side with Hiba. I too have a very strong opinion on this matter. That is why I am writing on it today. Moreover, there are some lessons to be learnt by married people and those intending to go into marriage.

    She is asking for divorce on grounds of adultery in a country where only about 47 per cent of the people find adultery “unacceptable.” No problem, it is a personal decision. Beyond promiscuity, Hakimi is alleged to have raped a lady.  It is a grievous allegation, but the police are still investigating. Yet Hiba is already filing for divorce. She has also promised to offer support to the alleged rape victim against Hakimi when the police have not formally brought charges against Hakimi. Yet she wants $8.5m of Hakimi’s money to add to her current networth of about $2m to help her support the alleged rape victim! Meanwhile, Hakimi’s mother has jumped to his defense that that the rape allegation is false. You decide who is showing love between mother and wife.

    On what grounds is Hiba asking for this money? Is it because she was married to him for three years or the two boys they had together? Or is it because of breaking his marital vow of fidelity? When former President Bill Clinton was caught pants down with Monica Lewinsky, Hilary Clinton, his wife, stood by him. She did not ask for divorce though she had grounds to do so. She stood by him through and through. For me, that is love and maturity. Hilary is the real deal.

    When Cheryl Ann Tweedy, a famous singer in England, got tired of the former Arsenal left back, Ashley Coles’ infidelity, she divorced Cole. Unlike Hiba, Cheryl did not take any money from Cole. In fact, she let him keep their $8 million mansion. It was clear that her problem with Cole was his infidelity. She was sincere and transparent. If Hiba must go, why not do what Cheryl did? Just walk away to have your peace of mind. She can also ask for child support, which Hakimi is morally obliged to provide and it is allowed in the French legal system on divorce, but half of his wealth after only three years of marriage is pure greed.

    I encourage married people to keep their marital vows, but not everyone does. When your spouse cheats in marriage, you have two legal options. You either forgive him/her and continue with the marriage, or you divorce your spouse. But if you want a divorce, be honourable about it and to behave like Cheryl, Ashley Cole’s wife. If not, you risk being seen as a gold digger. That is the problem people have with Hiba. She wants a bountiful harvest where she did not sow or sowed sparingly.

    The primary reason for marriage is companionship. Where is the companionship when Hiba has filed for divorce after three years of marriage? And she wants $8.5m. If money was so easy to get, why is she worth only $2m after many years of acting? Money is tough to accumulate, yet she wants to rob someone of his hard earned money? Does she realise what footballers go through to get to Hakimi’s level? Islam encourages Muslims to uphold the values of JUSTICE and KINDNESS in divorce, and Hakimi and Hiba are “practicing Muslims,” but I cannot see these values in Hiba’s action.

    Supporters of Hiba should realise that when you are 34 and go ahead and marry a 22 year-old-man, you have to deal with a lot of immaturity. Women mature way faster than men, not to talk of when there is a 12 years difference in age. Leaning on his supportive mother and his family for emotional support and answers to some life’s mysteries is inevitable. It is your choice on who to get married to, but life’s choices come with concomitant implications. Hiba should go and take tutorials from spouses who married considerably younger men/women.

    I do not understand why people are dragging Hakim’s mother. Hakim’s wife never said her mother-in-law interfered in the marriage. For your information, Hakimi joined Real Madrid youth academy when he was just eight years old. He quickly rose through the ranks and made his professional debut for Real Madrid in October 2017 in a Copa del Rey match against Fuenlabrada. At this time, Hiba was not in the picture. His mother and family guided him. It was probably at this time his mother started managing his resources. He knows best why he maintained the status quo after marriage, but Hiba’s action has proven that Hakimi was right in keeping the bulk of his assets from her grips. You expose your assets to loving and loyal spouses, not greedy gold diggers.

    Hakimi’s mother should be left alone. She is a wonderful African women. She was just being faithful to her son. Hakimi never complained that his mother mismanaged his money, so why the noise? In relationships between daughter-in-law and mother-in-law, as long as the man is mature and none of the women is greedy, they can live harmoniously. It is greed and immaturity that bring issues between mothers-in-law and their daughters-in-law. So if you want to invent conflict between Hakimi’s wife and mother, blame the wife for her greed. In marriage, trust is earned not given. If you are committed to a relationship and go ahead to marry your fiancé/fiancée, trust is built gradually by positive actions. But if you become greedy, erratic or unpredictable, the trust diminishes.

    May be, supporters of Hiba wanted another case of Emmanuel Eboue replayed. Emmanuel Eboue, a former Ivory Coast International, spent eight years in Arsenal. He made some good money, but lost a substantial part of his money and assets in England to his Belgian wife, Aurélie, in a divorce case. His saving grace were his assets and money in Africa (mainly Ghana and Ivory Coast) which the wife could not get her hands on.

    As I was rounding up this article, Hakimi mother’s response came in: “If he (Hakimi) has taken any action to protect himself, I’m unaware of it. What’s the problem if the news is true? If my son does not do this, he will not be able to get rid of that woman [Hiba Abouk].”

    Achraf Hakimi Mouh’s infidelity and the mother’s response notwithstanding, I still stand with him. If you do not know what marriage is all about, stand aside. Marriage is not an institution for gold diggers. If you want to dig gold go to Zamfara State, Ghana or South Africa.

    NB: We shall talk about nuclear family and extended family relationship next week. Some women complained about the extended family (Hakimi’s mother specifically) in their reactions to the story.