Tag: Fuel Subsidy Removal

  • Fuel subsidy removal: Nigerians divided as FG seeks to spend $800m loan on palliative

    Fuel subsidy removal: Nigerians divided as FG seeks to spend $800m loan on palliative

    Nigeria has in recent months come under pressure to end its controversial subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) otherwise known as petrol.

    This is even more so as the Ghana National Petroleum Authority announced last month that it had removed the country’s fuel subsidy in response to global oil and petrol market volatility caused by the Russian-Ukraine war and energy transition policies.

    According to a report by the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), Nigeria spent a total of N13.697 trillion on fuel subsidy payments which was enough to construct three refineries with the capacity to refine 450,000 barrels of crude per day, but the subsidy payments mainly benefitted the rich.

    Nigeria is believed to consume around 66.8 million litres of petrol daily, yet the Initiative disclosed that 90 per cent of the beneficiaries of fuel subsidy payments are the rich, while only four per cent of the poor benefit from the subvention.

    The Minister of Finance Zainab Ahmed, has noted that fuel subsidy was a very significant contributory factor to revenue loss in the country.

    “In June 2023, we should be able to exit. The good thing is, we hear a consistent message that everybody is saying this thing needs to go because it is not serving the majority of Nigerians,” Ahmed said earlier in the year.

    On his part, the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, described fuel subsidy as a “criminal enterprise”.

    “I have said this publicly before that I don’t know the figure,” he said of the opacity surrounding Nigeria’s petrol consumption figures.

    “I am told the figure sometimes rises to as high as 90 or over 100 million litres. I don’t know how that happens. At this rate, if anyone is looking at a criminal enterprise, look no further than the fuel subsidy.”

    Previous Failed Attempts to Remove Fuel Subsidy

    As of the year 2000, the Nigerian government said it was spending $2 billion to subsidise the price of fuel annually, and the then Nigerian President, Olusegun Obasanjo, had attempted to remove fuel subsidies but the move was resisted by organised labour, which argued that it would deepen poverty and hardship.

    In 2012, the government of former President Goodluck Jonathan attempted to remove fuel subsidies which would cause the price of the product to increase N65 – N141 per litre, but the plan resulted in nationwide protests and was again stayed.

    President Muhammadu Buhari in his first term took steps to end the fuel subsidy and did not make any budgetary provision for subsidies in 2016, the first significant success in revamping the subsidy regime which saved the country at least N15.4 billion monthly.

    However, the following year in 2017, the government reverted to the payments of fuel subsidies after the landing cost of imported fuel jumped to N171, in order to ease the pains of Nigerians.

    $800 million planned palliative stirs up fresh criticisms

    Nigeria has secured an $800 million relief package from the World Bank to help cushion the impact of a planned removal of fuel in June.

    The finance minister explained the money would be disbursed to 10 million households as cash, as well as used to fund a mass transit system to ease the cost of daily commutes.

    “We’ve secured some funding from the World Bank. That is the first tranche of palliatives that will enable us give cash transfers to the most vulnerable in our society that have now been registered in a national social register.

    “Today that register has a list of 10 million households. 10 million households is equivalent to about 50 million Nigerians,” Ahmed said.

    However, this plan does not yet appear to have the support of major stakeholders and there is a palpable distrust among the populace, that the palliatives would be evenly distributed or effective in cushioning the effect of the subsidy removal.

    For example, the President of the Association of Senior Civil Servants of Nigeria (ASCSN), Tommy Okon, accused the government of paying lip service to the poverty situation in the country.

    “What are palliatives compared to inflation, socio-economic challenges, and lack of welfare for Nigerian workers?

    “We are used to hearing about palliatives, it is not a new thing… We are not moved by the palliatives. This is not the first time government is talking about palliatives, because most of them collect palliatives to settle their people,” Okon said.

    Similarly, the Director-General of the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA), Adewale-Smatt Oyerinde, has cautioned the government against using scarce resources to fix policy problems.

    Oyerinde in a statement on Thursday, said the planned palliative was both unrealistic and unsustainable, even as it made no economic sense to inject cash into an economy that is already beset with unending inflationary pressures.

    “The $800 million, at best, is equivalent to about N360 billion. When you divide this by the targeted 10 million households, that amounts to approximately N36,000. What significant or tangible effect would this have on anyone, irrespective of status? We will only end up adding more woes to our shrinking economy.

    “What we request is a more all-encompassing institutional structure to manage the gradual removal of the subsidy after fixing the refineries and not the proposed palliatives.

    “It is worthy of note that previous palliatives had proved not to palliate the economic woes of the citizens. In reality and within the context of our current economic situation, the majority of Nigerians are vulnerable, especially organised businesses,” he said.

    A federal lawmaker from Rivers State, Farah Dagogo, has called on FG to abandon its planned disbursement of $800 million to about 50 million Nigerians and instead invest the funds into the education and health sectors of the country.

    Using the Ghana example, some Nigerians who spoke to this newspaper expressed hope that the $800 million would be used to establish a special fund to revamp the country’s refineries and increase their capacity to meet the country’s consumption needs.

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that “the absence of public support for subsidy reform is in part due to a lack of confidence in the ability of governments to shift the resulting budgetary savings to programs that would compensate the poor.”

    The IMF urged the government to prioritise strengthening revenue mobilisation, including through tax administration reforms, expanding the tax automation system and strengthening taxpayer segmentation, and improving tax compliance in the country.

    Over the years, policies aimed at removing fuel subsidy have been met with stiff opposition and has sometimes led to widespread public protests, as the majority of Nigerians do not see what positive impact it would have on their lives.

    Open data analyst and Chief Executive Officer of budgIT, Oluseun Onigbinde, said that although the poor citizens are the least beneficiaries of fuel subsidies, they  in would bear the brunt of the inflationary effect of fuel subsidy removal.

    “So mitigating this effect is what the government needs to sit down and plan around for palliative. Also, trust is important and the sensitivity of the political class would be very crucial in communicating the removal of fuel subsidy,” Onigbinde advised.

     

  • LCCI recommends phased fuel subsidy removal

    LCCI recommends phased fuel subsidy removal

    The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) in a statement on Tuesday in Lagos has recommended a phased removal of petroleum subsidy to mitigate its effect on the masses.

    This was made known by Dr Chinyere Almona, Director-General, LCCI in response to plans of the Federal government to suspend fuel subsidy removal as a result of some barriers

    Almona said the phased subsidy removal should go with harmonizing investment in critical infrastructure aimed at supporting production in the economy.

    According to her, more production meant more job creation, poverty reduction and improved economic growth.

    The LCCI DG, however, noted that a monthly payment of about N250 billion to subsidise fuel consumption meant an additional N1.5 trillion expenditure in the 2022 budget.

    She stated that with additional expenditure against the projected revenue, deficit financing would be needed to support the budget expenditure.

    Almona noted that the development was likely to see the government borrowing more than projected to finance the bloated expenditure in the face of revenue mobilisation challenge.

    “The signing of the Petroleum Industry Bill into law by President Muhammadu Buhari was well-received by all major stakeholders and seen as a commendable act by the government.

    “The political will to sign the Bill into law was highly applauded because of the expectations of many on the full exploitation of the inherent potential of the oil and gas sector.

    “Less than a year into the signing of the Act, the implementation has suffered a flip-flop as some of the provisions of the Act are being suspended,” she said.

    Aloma said while the LCCI supported the full implementation of the PIA and total deregulation of the oil and gas sector, it was not insensitive to the plight of the masses that might feel the pains of fuel subsidy removal.

    “Since the announcement of the planned removal of fuel subsidies, there have been numerous reactions expressing displeasure and readiness to stage protests against the planned action.

    “The government on the other hand had expressed its concerns about the unsustainable subsidy payment which has become a strain on government revenue.

    “In the face of this dilemma, we recommend that the removal is phased.

    “The Federal Government must consider doing all that is possible not to truncate the implementation of the PIA 2021, which has already brought so much hope for industry watchers as a big game-changer for the oil and gas sector,” she said.

    The LCCI DG also stressed the need for stakeholders’ consultations on addressing the implications of lapsed provisions of the Act and forging the way ahead towards the full implementation of the Act.

     

  • Domestic refinery owners support oil subsidy removal

    Domestic refinery owners support oil subsidy removal

    The Domestic Refinery Owners Association of Nigeria (DROAN), have thrown their weight behind the Federal Government’s removal of oil subsidy in the country.

    The National Chairman of the association, Mr Godwin Sunday, made this known in a press conference organised by the association in Uyo on Saturday.

    Sunday said that the association was in full support of President Muhammadu Buhari’s courageous stand in bringing the subsidy regime to an end.

    He urged stakeholders in the oil industry and indeed all Nigerians to support the policy and the establishment of modular refineries in the country.

    He said that the establishment of modular refineries across the Niger Delta region would enhance youth employment and bring an end to youth restiveness, illegal bunkering and pipeline vandalism.

    “The oil sector, as we all know, has been the major stay of our economy and contribute more than 80 per cent to the growth of our nation.

    “Therefore, as responsible citizens of this country, we have seen the need to join hands with the government to protect our major source of sustenance, the crude oil.

    “We salute the courage of the Federal Government led by President Muhammadu Buhari for bringing the subsidy regime to an end.

    “We applaud the government, and we are also appealing to Nigerians to support the government in this direction.

    “We trust that better days are here because the resources that was used for oil subsidy will now be channeled into other developmental projects like education, health and infrastructure development,” Sunday said.

    The national chairman said that the association was deeply concerned over the devastating effect of illegal oil bunkering on the ecosystem.

    He said that the association plans to embark on sensitisation exercise against illegal oil bunkering in the country, adding that the association had acquired three speed boats to penetrate the Creeks for the exercise.

    He said, “Considering the devastating effect on our environment, which obviously is leading to the environmental pollution, degradation and even a negative effect on our ecosystem.

    “We, as a people, have unanimously ageed that we cannot continue to steal what seemingly belongs to us.

    “To deepen this commitment, we have acquired three speed boats with 75 horse power engine each to enable us penetrate the creeks to carry out sensitisation exercise tagged; ‘Operation Stop Illegal Bunkering in Nigeria.’”

    He appealed to the government to set up a Presidential Committee to look into the activities of artisanal oil refiners in the Niger Delta.

    The chairman also appealed to individuals and organisations setting up modular refineries in the country, to partner with the association for easy and smooth integration of the artisanal refiners.

  • Fuel Subsidy Removal and Naira Devaluation: Who says President Buhari Does not Listen to Advise?, By Magnus Onyibe

    Fuel Subsidy Removal and Naira Devaluation: Who says President Buhari Does not Listen to Advise?, By Magnus Onyibe

    By Magnus onyibe

    The bitter and sweet policies of gradually abolishing fuel subsidy regime and guided floating of the naira might have taken a long time in coming-nearly six years. But as the saying goes, it’s better late than never.

    And with the current developments in the monetary market and in the petroleum products retail sector, President Mohammadu Buhari has obviously softened his earlier hard stance against naira devaluation and elimination of fuel subsidy- two critical factors in the economy that have been distorting the development fundamentals of our country.

    Keeping in mind that the late chief of staff , CoS to the President, mallam Abba Kyari had midwifed the assemblage of a coterie of academic eggheads, seasoned technocrats and financial consultants that got inaugurated as the new presidential economic advisory committee in replacement of the Vice President, Yemi Osibanjo led team which had been in that role since the inception of this Govt , my prediction may not be dismissed with a wave of the hand.

    However, by virtue of the fact that l don’t have my name plate in any of the doors in Aso Rock Villa corridors of power, l can’t confidently lay claim to knowing fully well wether it is the new presidential economic team that has helped in shaping president Buhari’s new thinking about eliminating fuel subsidy and naira devaluation that has seen the pump price of fuel go up and naira exchange rate spike. But a gut feeling tells me that the presidential economic advisory team may be the propelling force driving the new wind blowing in the economic firmament.

    The august body led by professor Doyin Salami , a don at lagos business school, along with professor Chukwuma Soludo , ex CBN governor , and mr Bismarck Rewane, a financial consultant amongst fistful of other professionals, was charged with the responsibility of crafting sound and viable economic development policies for our country.

    Given that the economic ship of state of Nigeria seemed to have been drifting like a rudderless vessel being tossed up and down in the ocean and at the mercy of violent waves exacerbated by the current crude oil price volatility and COVID-19 induced global economic meltdown, the formation of the presidential economic advisory body of experts to steer the ship away from the hazard, was a timely initiative.

    Although such a formidable and astute team of managers of the economy should have been instituted at the inception of the administration six years ago,president Buhari in his wisdom prioritized anti corruption war by inaugurating the professor Itse Sagay led Presidential committee on anti corruption which in my view has been hurting instead of helping Nigeria. The foregoing assertion is underscored by the fact that it is the committee and the EFCC that have been de- marketing our country through the numerous mind boggling and mostly unsubstantiated claims of monumental corruption that they keep alleging against Nigerians which precipitated the flight of capital out of our country . The crystallization of the damage that the crying of wolf, where there is none, by members of the presidential anti corruption committee and other agencies of govt , especially the minister of Information, Lai Mohamed that was cloaking Nigeria and Nigerians with the toga of corruption, culminated into the labeling of our country and people as ‘fantastically corrupt’ by former British PM, David Cameron when he was introducing president Buhari to queen Elizabeth on the sideline of an anti corruption conference held in London on May 12, 2016.

    In an article titled “Which is Hurting More, Corruption or Collateral Damage From Fighting I?” that l wrote and published in ThisdayNewspaper of July 25, 2016 and also widely shared on online media platforms, l denounced what can simply be illustrated with the act of a husband calling his wife a prostitute in the presence of his neighbors which is license for the neighbors to call her worse name than a whore .The referenced piece admonished Govt against making only anti corruption the fulcrum and Centre piece of its development policy or raison dete of the administration by making a song and dance of corruption in Nigeria, simply because diplomats and international agencies in our country would send the negative fallouts back to their home countries or offices and which would negatively color the perception and influence the policies of their home countries towards Nigeria . So the motive of my essay was to draw the attention of authorities to the peril and dire consequences of taking its anti corruption war to an absurd extent as highlighted above .
    Below is an excerpt from the referenced article:

    “Some of us have literarily been at President Muhammadu Buhari’s ‘throat’ over what we deem to be economically, socially and politically rough methods and procedures that the president has been adopting in combating corruption in Nigerian and the catastrophic effects on the nation. Apart from the evidently obtrusive anti-corruption war, another clog in the wheel of progress is the knee jerk and pigeon hole policy initiatives that have led to failed expectations of positive outcomes, as opposed to unleashing a holistic policy package, which could have addressed all identified economic, political and social challenges harmoniously in a timeous manner, without equivocation and thus yield the desired socioeconomic liberation of Nigeria”

    “By now, it must be clear to all, as it has become incontestable that, it is the economic, social and political fallouts of the brutish pursuit and tunnel vision of eliminating corruption at all costs by this administration that is the culprit for the unprecedented hardship currently putting the nation’s economy on a lockdown.

    The fiasco that the economy has been plunged into is reflected in the imminent recession now confirmed by both the IMF in its World Economic Outlook, WEO report and the Central bank of Nigeria, CBN via Governor Godwin Emefiele’s recent testimony to the Nigerian senate.

    Other incidents or events signposting the fact that Nigeria and indeed Nigerians are in dire straits are: social upheavals in the north east triggered by Boko Haram terrorism resulting in millions of families being consigned to living miserably in Internally Displaced People, IDP camps; renewed Niger Delta militancy focused on bombing oil facilities that has crippled oil/gas business and damaged the ecosystem and environment very badly; the recent increasingly violent crimes popping up in the suburbs of Lagos and in fact, across the country in the form of kidnappings and violent attacks on defenceless people by bandits disguised as herdsmen”

    “As glaringly disruptive and debilitating as the effects of the anti-corruption war has been on the hoi poloi, whom the president is ostensibly protecting, nobody has considered a change of tactics to ease the pain on the less privileged members of society. This implies that our leaders may be oblivious of the reality of how, cruel, grueling and dreary life has become for the average Nigerian in the past one year.

    In the light of the growing and palpable despondency being foisted on the populace, following the economic woes in the country fueling the emasculation of the common man, the rhetorical question elicited by the circumstances would be: which is more hurtful, corruption or the collateral damage of fighting it?”

    “On a scale of balance, the simple and rational answer would be that corruption is more harmful, because it is debilitating and virulent like HIV/aids, Ebola virus and cancer disease combined, but in fighting the malaise, authorities should be careful not to inadvertently throw away the baby and the bath water, otherwise, the collateral damage could be equal, if not more devastating, as we are currently witnessing in Nigeria”

    Isn’t it so gut wrenching that the piece written four years ago, still rings true today?
    With the new fangled compound word RE-LOOTING rapidly joining the lexicon of Nigerians as the circus show featuring the Ministry of Justice and the EFCC evolves , l’m vindicated in my argument four years ago (2016) that the foremost financial crime fighting agency, the EFCC and the presidential committee on anti corruption, were inflicting more harm on the economy as opposed to adding value if indeed the EFCC is guilty of relooting what has been recovered from looters.

    The opening quote in the chapter titled “Corruption and the Unending Fight Against It” in my forthcoming book LEADERS , LEADING and LEADERSHIP: MEDIA INTERVENTIONS BY A PUBLIC INTELLECTUAL (1999-2019) features a remarkable quote by Jose Angel Gurira, who is the current OECD Secretary-General and it goes thus:
    “Integrity, transparency and the fight against corruption have to be part of the culture. They have to be taught as fundamental values’’

    The message conveyed in the quote above is that curbing or stopping corruption can not be a 100 meters dash or fought in a manner reminiscent of the fire brigade combating an inferno , neither should it take the form of a bull charging into a chinaware shop, and in the process destroying the shop, which anti corruption war currently looks like in Nigeria .

    Rather it has to be driven like a missionary , if you like jihadist, (without violence) aiming at changing the hearts and minds of people in their immediate community , which in my view is the best way to achieve the sustainable cultural change that would make most Nigerians detest and abhor corruption.
    So the philosophy of slow and steady wins the race seems more appropriate in that regard.
    And I’m not unaware that owing to constitutional curtailments, presidents have tenures of only two terms of four years each in Nigeria .

    As such they often want to impress their support base by hastily concluding court processes before their exit so that they can claim that they are the ones that jailed alleged thieving politicians , who more often than not are actually their political enemies. Also the case of such political leaders as well as the heads of the crime fighting agencies like the EFCC ascribing messianic powers to themselves by taking pride in reeling off the list of politicians jailed (giant killers) and the assets and funds recovered under their watch is another bane of our country’s approach to fighting corruption since independence. Incidentally, that’s allegedly , in part, Magu’s albatross as he is now being asked to ‘cough’ out the humongous sums he had been touting as having been recovered.

    The folly of doing the same thing over and over with the same result , which is a definition of insanity/madness motivated me to write a piece during last year’s Independence Day anniversary titled “Nigeria At 59: Are Our Leaders Mad?”

    The case that l tried to make in that piece which was widely published in the mass media is that our country has been fighting corruption in the same way it did even before independence when the British colonial rulers indicted both Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe and chief Obafemi Awolowo who where later to take over from them as leaders of the new nation in the role of President-General of Nigeria and Premier of western region.

    That the same method of naming and shaming , charging and bailing which has woefully failed to yield positive results (except the introduction of whistle blowing ) have remained the practice about 60 years after, is not only preposterous , but indicates that our leaders have been highly unimaginative.

    Another affirmation that corruption virus in our country has become highly toxic and very destructive, and therefore might have attained the status of a pandemic, is that corrupt politicians and their cohort no longer demand mere 10/% which was the case in the 1960s , but they now walk away with the entire contract sum without any work being done as being allegedly witnessed in NDDC.
    Given the lessons above , Aso Rock villa must recognize the aforementioned drawbacks inherent in the current system or style of fighting graft in our country and make amendments accordingly.

    For instance, can you imagine that since it’s establishment in 2003 , the EFCC has not founded Anti Corruption clubs in our various institutions of learning where it could have commenced so that the much desired anti corruption cultural change in our youths can be achieved.

    No wonder youths now prefer to make the likes of Hushpuppi, the alleged internet fraudster, their role model instead of Tony Elumelu of Tony Elumelu Foundation , TEF, Herbert Wigwe of Access bank , Samad Rabiu of BUA and Femi Otedola, formerly of Forte oil and now into electricity power generation via Gerengu power project and indeed any other youth that has acquired wealth through genuine hard work and entrepreneurship.

    As my unsolicited advise and that of other well meaning members of the commentariat were unheeded , Nigeria suffered the first economic recession in 25 years from 2016 of which it is still partially mired and still trying to pull itself out from the hole.

    Happily, six (6) years after ascension into Aso Rock villa , president Buhari’s Govt has now done what some of us have been clamoring for, establishment of a Presidential economic advisory team, and entrusting the experts with the responsibility of pulling the economy back from the brinks and unearthing the parts that have already sunk into decay from the abyss is now achievable goal.

    Do the current changes in the petroleum products / pump price and foreign exchange markets go far enough to engender the much needed changes?
    Not at all. But they are correct strides in the right direction.
    Clearly , a lot more needs to be done to reform or rejig and align the factors of production and wealth creation in order for them to be harmonized. In particular, a more robust social safety net has to be introduced in the socio-economic landscape so that the new subsidy removal regime in both petroleum products import/sales and naira exchange rates would not hurt the critical masses so badly. To achieve the social objective, this time, efforts should be made so that the subsidy is geared towards production-education/skills acquisition as opposed to being abuja applied in consumption activities like the NNPC fuel subsidy and the CBN foreign exchange interventions.

    In the words of JF Kenedy, the 35th United States of America, USA president.
    “No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary.”
    It is in the light of the above that the wisdom in the wise counsel of converting problem into promotion comes into play.

    Owing to the leadership chaos and confusion that have enveloped the country , the ruling party, APC has been in political hot water even from among its supporters arising from the slew of financial scandals cascading from the vila to the ministries , departments and agencies , MDAs that are besetting the party that before its ascension to power prided itself as being on a mission to wipe out corruption in our country.

    After practically decimating rival political parties , particularly the former ruling party, PDP members by arraigning or jailing most of them (especially its former spokesman Olisa Métuh and a couple of ex governors) on account of corruption, it was sheer hypocrisy that barely two years into its first tenure, its greatest achievement is that it had surpassed the former ruling party’s record of corruption.

    And this is underscored by the fact that between 2015-18, at least half a dozen serving cabinet members and then secretary to Govt , SGF as well as head of security agencies including Nigeria Intelligence Agency, NIA, were indicted for corruption.

    When one adds the frightening skeletons allegedly being exhumed from the vault of the EFCC -the nation’s anti corruption agency which is being subjected to scrutiny or undergoing assizes by the retired Justice Ayo Salami led panel , then the ruling party’s loss of moral justification to continue to pride itself as anti corruption party becomes fully manifest.

    By way of clarification, as a crisis manager, l deem it my duty to advise Aso Rock villa to not be like an ostrich that buries it’s head in the sand without realizing that the rest of its body is exposed.

    It is against that backdrop that l’m calling a spade what it truly is, by diagnosing what’s ailing us as a country with the hope that it would be a sort of wake up call for the ruling party, APC and the powers that be in Aso Rock villa.
    Having come into full circle with its anti-corruption war through which it has virtually completely muzzled the opposition , it has now literarily turned its guns against its self. I would argue that what can be best described as internal introspection that started with the targeting of erstwhile opposition members in the APC, whose hands are not clean and therefore cross carpeted to the ruling party for protection has ballooned into what seems like a national inquest . Four years after treading that path and exhausting the initially targeted category, the anti great agencies who were feeding on the frenzy finally started baying for the blood of APC’s core members because the EFCC , DSS and NIA had become like the proverbial tigers whose riders would later become their prey/victims when they get off their back .

    That’s evidenced or signposted by the embarrassing schisms that have now gripped the numerous govt agencies-EFCC, NDDC,NSTIF, and National Assembly , NASS etc whose members are indicted or under investigation.

    Strangely, rather than being driven by any altruistic value, the movement or internal inquest or assizes of APC led Govt seem like self propelling and a natural cause of action.

    The good news is that the rash of investigations may end up being for our country’s greater good as it can be an opportunity for president Buhari to press a reset button for the ruling party and his Govt.
    Now, it may appear like a spin to some people , but justice minister, Abubakar Malami’s recent statement on NTA late on Friday night as reported by The Nation newspaper , is so far the best explanation given by Govt for the ongoing investigation of the EFCC that has unearthed a lot of strange stuffs. According to The Nation newspaper, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, stated during the NTA interview that “ the ongoing probe of the leadership of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is a plus for President Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-corruption policy”

    “He dismissed the fears in some quarters that the probe was a vendetta against the EFCC leadership.
    The newspaper report quoted mr Malami aa stating that :
    “It is, indeed, a plus. It goes to establish the tradition for which this government is known; a tradition of no fear or favour as far as investigating corruption cases are concerned or corruption allegations or issues,”
    “It is indeed a plus that has reenacted, reinforced and reestablished a tradition by which the government of President Muhammadu Buhari is known, which tradition is to the effect that no allegation of corruption can be swept under the carpet. So, it is, indeed, to my mind, a plus and not a blow,”

    Although the justice minister’s comments at first appear to be incredulous, but when put in context, it is actually plausible because real corruption fighters prove themselves to be who they claim they are by first of all starting the clean up from inside their own stable.
    That’s in line with the dictum ‘ charity begins at home’.

    At this moment in time that most Nigerians are searching for answers to the avalanche of malfeasance and a slew of investigations of MDAs with the overwhelming effect on the polity , l guess Nigerians might as well take the attorney general’s word at its face value and wait to see how the internal probes which he claims signify that president Buhari is not covering up the misdeeds of his associates, pan out.

    Perhaps , just like president Buhari has allowed market forces to determine the pump price of fuel without subsidizing it to force the cost down , and by allowing the naira to float without the erstwhile massive CBN intervention which is also a form of subsidy to boost the naira , the plethora of ongoing probes could be indicative of the likelihood that mr president may also be allowing justice take its course and as such any member of his Govt or the ruling party accused of financial impropriety or indicted for fraud would face the law.

    That’s my understanding based on my studied assessment of events as they are unfolding.
    And the assertion above is derived from and anchored on the belief that being in his second term, and one year into his four year tenure, president Buhari may not like to exit power with his image as an incorruptible leader besmirched.

    As such , it is likely that he would be allowing the law to takes its course against those that have infringed and have cases to answer this giving him a bad name.
    If my analysis and prediction prove to be true , then there is no hiding for the rogues currently hiding in the shadow of the Buhari name with what may turn out to be false immunity when he turns them in for the long arm of the law to catch up with them.
    If he could do so with lbrahim Magu, the erstwhile blue eyed prince of his inner court and czar of the EFCC , then what president Buhari could do with any other cabinet, party member or people in his orbit, found culpable, is better imagined.

    Nevertheless , with no slam dunk or smoking gun evidence so far , it is looking like Magu may scale through the inquisition unscathed, and if that happens , then Nigerians can heave a sigh of relief from the nightmare and roller coaster of corruption and the unending fight against it.

    Magnus onyibe , an author, entrepreneur, development strategist and alumnus of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts university, Massachusetts, USA and former commissioner in delta state govt sent this piece from lagos.For more views, and insights visit magnum.ng.