Tag: Fuel Subsidy

  • Past govts lacked courage to remove fuel subsidy – Presidency

    Past govts lacked courage to remove fuel subsidy – Presidency

    The Presidency on Sunday defended President Muhammadu Buhari over the removal of fuel subsidy, pointing out that though it had long been seen as the right thing to do, previous administrations lacked the courage to take the action.

    A statement issued by Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to the President (Media & Publicity) in Abuja, pointed out that Buhari was taking both popular and unpopular decisions as a leader because he has the courage to do so as the circumstances dictate.

    The statement noted that subsidy removal had long been seen as a game-changer by successive administrations but the courage to implement the reforms was lacking.

    It said more than the expectations of critics, history will be kind to Buhari for eliminating the evil of corruption embedded in subsidies.

    While the Presidency noted the argument of critics as to the timing of the subsidy removal, it admonished that what President Buhari needs now is the support of all including the opposition.

    The statement read: “The All Progressives Congress, APC came to power in 2015 defeating an incumbent administration amidst very high expectations from President Muhammadu Buhari.

    “Five years on, the administration has worked hard to meet many expectations, but still, there are certain tough decisions which had to be taken to put back the country on the path of sustainable development.

    “To stop the mismanagement of taxpayer money, eliminate corruption associated with subsidies on petroleum products, power, fertilizer among others, the administration took the decision to implement long-delayed reforms, withdraw and allow the market to determine their prices.

    “Subsidy removal in these sectors had long been foreseen by successive administrations as game changers in search of solutions to move forward with the nation’s development. These are reforms that are necessary and overdue.

    “Blueprint upon blueprint, timeline upon timeline had come and gone but the courage to take bold decisions was not there.

    “Over the last few days, one claim acquiring a potent resonance with the online community, sections of the labour movement and the opposition are that the actions are ill-timed and ill-advised.

    “There is nothing new in the fact that the country is today fighting multiple challenges along with COVID-19, including low earnings, near-collapse of the oil market, floods, threats of terrorism and banditry but the challenges notwithstanding, a good government must make decisions for the people’s good.

    “As President, Muhammadu Buhari takes these difficult decisions, both popular and unpopular and as a leader because he is demonstrating the right courage to take such decisions as they become necessary in view of present circumstances.

    “History will be kind to President Buhari because, in addition to his amazing ability to command votes, he will be remembered as the President who made real contributions to economic and overall national development by eliminating the evils of corruption embedded in subsidies.

    “In any democracy, the most important certificate in governance is acceptance by the people and, with the support of ordinary Nigerians, President Buhari has shown a rare determination to carry out the bold initiatives as these ones driven by nothing other than the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

    “In carrying out the reforms, the President needs the support and understanding of all citizens-inclusive of the opposition parties, the labour movement and civil society groups.

    “In these challenging times, the President is pushing development goals, not politics and history will judge him in favourable terms rather than his critics in the new media and the opposition.”

  • FG says it lacks money to continue to pay fuel subsidy

    FG says it lacks money to continue to pay fuel subsidy

    Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, disclosed this on Thursday in Abuja in a briefing to mark his one year in office.

    Sylva said the Federal Government has also resolved to step aside from fixing fuel prices, thus it has decided to merge the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA), and the Petroleum Equalisation Fund (PEF).

    The merged body would henceforth be known as ‘The Authority’.

    The minister, who emphasized that decision to deregulate the downstream sector, as well as subsidy suspension was not political, said the deregulation policy had saved the nation about N1 trillion since it was introduced in March 2020.

    His words: “It became necessary that the country cannot sustain subsidy payments, hence the decision to deregulate. Government has stopped subsidising petrol at the pump, but will now play its traditional role of protecting consumers from exploitation, by ensuring that marketers do not profiteer at the expense of ordinary Nigerians and consumers of the product.

    “We are no longer in the business of fixing prices; we have stepped back and allowed market forces to determine the prices. Henceforth, if crude oil price goes up or down, it would reflect at the pumps.

    “This is about the survival of the country and there are certain things the country can afford at this time. We have cut production to 1.412 million barrels, which had halved our earnings.”

    He added that the revenue that is currently available to the government had reduced considerably, and has raised the question of where would the government get the money to pay subsidy.

    “It is a necessary policy; we would get over this initial pain, with time, we would get past it,” Sylva maintained.

    According to him, “the savings of about N1 trillion since the removal of subsidy comes from the expulsion of N500 billion earmarked for subsidy payment in the 2020 budget and the removal of foreign exchange differentials, which saved the country around N500 billion also.”

    He stressed further that in order to reduce the harsh implications of the new policy on the masses, the FG would hasten a roll-out of cleaner and cheaper alternative to premium Motor Spirit, PMS, also known as petrol, such as liquefied Petroleum Gas, LPG, and Compressed Natural Gas, CNG.

    “We think the solution to this should be sustainable, hence the palliative that the government is considering, is that we are introducing a fuel that is cheaper and better. In the end, I do not think people would feel the increase that much, as gas would be cheaper by half than PMS.

    “The Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, had introduced new funds for Nigerians at cheaper rates.” He added.

    Sylva further assured the public of governments commitment against any form of extortion by the oil marketers.

  • Petrol subsidy gulped N101.6bn in three months – NNPC

    Petrol subsidy gulped N101.6bn in three months – NNPC

    Petrol subsidy consumed over N101bn in the first three months of this year.

    Latest figures released by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation have shown that petrol subsidy gulped N101.65bn in the first three months of the year.

    In its just-released Monthly Financial and Operations March 2020 report, the national oil firm, however, described the subsidy spending as under-recovery.

    It had consistently argued that only the National Assembly was empowered to approve petrol subsidy, despite the fact that NNPC’s monthly under-recoveries were due to subsidy on petrol.

    An analysis of the latest report on Sunday showed that the corporation spent N43.31bn as subsidy on petrol in January this year.

    In February, it incurred N20.68bn as under-recovery, while in March the oil firm spent N37.66bn as subsidy.

    Petrol subsidy was, however, halted in March 2020 by the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency following the crash in global crude oil prices.

    The crash in crude oil price, according to the PPPRA, gave rise to the end of petrol subsidy, as the agency stated that petrol price would be adjusted in accordance to global oil prices.

    The PPPRA has adjusted petrol price about three times since after the first adjustment in March this year.

    The NNPC report further stated that the corporation paid N434.25bn to the Federation Account Allocation Committee during the quarter under review.

    It stated that in January, a total of N138.57bn was remitted to FAAC, while the committee received N148.53bn from the corporation in February 2020.

    The NNPC said it paid N147.15bn to FAAC in March this year.

  • Stoppage of fuel subsidy: Atiku hails Buhari-govt for following his advice

    Stoppage of fuel subsidy: Atiku hails Buhari-govt for following his advice

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has described the stoppage of fuel subsidy and price-fixing for petrol as a right move by the All Progressives Congress administration led by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Abubakar was also the leading opposition Peoples Democratic Party presidential candidate in the 2019 general elections.

    On his verified Twitter handle on Friday, he called on Federal and State Governments to remove other impediments and roll out incentives to spur investments in the oil sector.

    He tweeted: “Federal government finally withdraws from the fuel subsidy and price-fixing bazaar that had been rife with corruption and stalling investments.

    “This is something patriots have been calling for and for which I was demonised.

    “The stoppage of subsidy and price-fixing is a right move, although it should have come earlier when the economy was stronger.

    “Federal and state governments should proceed to remove other impediments and roll out incentives to spur investments in the sector, especially the numerous refineries that had been licensed but are yet to be built.

    “Then ensure the quality of fuel meets set standards.”

  • Fuel subsidy: FG urged to channel revenue to health sector

    Fuel subsidy: FG urged to channel revenue to health sector

    An expert in the oil and gas industry has urged the federal government to use the opportunity presented by the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) crisis to remove fuel subsidy in real terms and channel the revenue to the health sector of the Nigerian economy.

    Faith Nwadishi, Director of Women in Extractives, who made the call during a Twitter conference hosted by Dayo Ibitoye on Monday, said Nigerians did not get the full picture of the politics behind the removal of subsidy in the wake of Occupy Nigeria in 2012.

    The Director, therefore, called on the President Muhammadu Buhari government to implement transparently the removal of subsidy as recently announced by Mallam Mele Kyari, the Group Managing Director (GMD) of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    She also urged the Buhari’s government to ensure stability in the region where oil is produced by addressing conflicts and ensuring transparency in the developments in the sector, such as the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), the Ogoni cleanup, amongst other initiatives.

    “Nigerians did not have a full picture of the politics behind the removal of the subsidy. I was one of those in 2012 that opposed the subsidy removal but the reality is that even though we have been told that there is no more subsidy, we keep seeing budget lines for it.

    “As of 2012, we had completely abused the reason for a subsidy on a commodity such as PMS. It was a conduit for the siphoning of our commonwealth by a few individuals, rather than subsidy benefiting the masses, it benefited rulers.

    “If government decides to remove subsidy, they should be upfront about it and be transparent in its implementation. Government needs to seek the trust of Nigerians on this; we had been short-changed in the past.

    “The outright removal of subsidy will be beneficial to us; hopefully we will see this happen. But the government must commit to a transparent rendition of the accounts and savings from the removal of subsidy.

    “The announcement by the GMD, NNPC is a welcome one and the right thing to do. With COVID-19 here, we must remove the subsidy and channel that revenue to other areas, e.g. our health sector,” Nwadishi stated.

    The Director also called on President Muhammadu Buhari to treat the Petroleum Industry Bill as a matter for urgent attention in the face of the COVID-19 challenges faced by the country, and the falling oil prices.

    According to her, it was sad that for almost two decades the nation was yet discussing the Petroleum Industry Bill, and what it will do for the industry; yet, no headway.

    She stressed that since the PIB will now be presented as an executive bill, which was one of the challenges of the last bill presented as a private member bill, the President should facilitate passage of the bill.

    “The PIB to a large extent will address the issues with the structural corruption in the country. Then, the individuals that will be responsible for these structures will have to be exemplary Nigerians.

    “We should also begin to carry out urgent reforms in the petroleum sector that will make it more beneficial to our economy and the people considering that we are an oil-dependent country.

    “Therefore, we need to urgently do the following, pass the PIB, ensure the stability of the sector, deregulation of the sector, implement transparently the removal of subsidy as announced by the GMD NNPC, ensure stability of the region, speed up the review of Presidential Amnesty Program and clear the uncertainty; revisit all reports of enquires and audits in the sector and implement the recommendations therein,” she stated.

    On the urgent need to diversify the nation’s economy in real terms, Nwadishi urged the Nigerian government to focus on three sectors, namely: manufacturing, agriculture and technology, she said would yield immediate results.

    “Government should engage more vigorously and sincerely the stakeholders in the different sectors outlined,” Nwadishi stated.

  • Fuel subsidy gulped N43.09bn in one month – PPPRA

    Fuel subsidy gulped N43.09bn in one month – PPPRA

    The Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) has disclosed that the federal government paid a total of N43.09 billion as fuel subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) or petrol in the month of January 2020.

    This means that in January, the government paid an average N26.27 on every litre of the commodity to enable Nigerians buy the product at a pump price of N145 per litre, while at N171.27 per litre at the Expected Open Market Price (EOMP).

    In its monthly PMS Pricing Templates and Daily Truck-Out data, the agency stated that the amount paid for subsidy was lower by 22.5 percent compared with amount paid in December 2019, N55.6 billion.

    With a total of over 1.6 billion litres of petrol supplied in the month, the federal government subsidy of N26.27 means a total of N43 billion was expended as subsidy in the first month of the year.

    PPPRA noted that the total amount expended as subsidy on PMS in January represented 9.58 percent of the N306 billion budgeted for fuel subsidy in the 2020 budget of the federal government.

    Giving a breakdown of the EOMP and its subsidies, it was revealed that for January 2, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 10; EOMP of PMS stood at N182.05 per litre, N182.28 per litre, N183.50 per litre, N179.50, N172.93 per litre and N174.52 per litre respectively, translating to subsidy of N37.05 per litre, N37.38 per litre, N38.50 per litre, N34.50 per litre, N27.93 per litre and N29.52 per litre.

    For January 13 to 17, EOMP of PMS stood at N173.89 per litre, N173.95 per litre, N172.49 per litre, N173.81 per litre and N171.77 per litre respectively; leading to subsidy of N28.89 per litre, N28.95 per litre, N27.49 per litre, N28.81 per litre and N26.77 per litre respectively.

    In addition, EOMP of N172.76 per litre,N173.84 per litre, N170.60 per litre, N167.56 per litre and N163.75 per litre were recorded from January 20 to 24, translating to subsidy of N27.76 per litre, N28.84 per litre, N25.60 per litre, N22.56 per litre and N18.75 per litre respectively.

    While for December 27 to 31, the Federal Government incurred subsidy of N14.86 per litre, N17.53 per litre, N18.49 per litre, N16.15 per litre, and N15.45 per litre respectively, from EOMP of PMS of N159.86 per litre, N162.53 per litre, N163.49 per litre, N161.15 per litre and N160.45 per litre.

    Now, with a decline in the prices of crude oil at the international market in February 2020 caused by coronavirus spread, it is believed that the subsidy paid for the month should be lower.

  • Fuel subsidy to gulp N450bn in 2020 – FG

    Fuel subsidy to gulp N450bn in 2020 – FG

    Fuel subsidy will gulp N450 billion in 2020, Finance, Budget and National Planning Minister Zainab Ahmed, said on Monday, as she gave a breakdown of the budget, now under consideration by the National Assembly.

    Ahmed avoided the lexical trap of subsidy, but instead called the cost ‘under-recovery’.

    Both the IMF and the World Bank and some local economic experts had asked Nigeria to stop subsidising petrol consumption and instead spend the money on infrastructure and other social services.

    This year, the total vote for works is N165 billion, about a third of the subsidy cost. Total vote for education is also N165billion, while housing will get N90billion, one-fifth of what the subsidy will consume.

    Ahmed said the subsidy is called ‘under-recovery’ because it was the cost of operation of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    “We have a provision for under-recovery of PMS in the sum of N450 billion. If you look at the Budget office website, it is in the fiscal framework, which is an annexure to the budget.”

    President Muhammadu Buhari had on Tuesday, presented a budget proposal of N10.33 trillion to a joint session of the National Assembly.

    He put the Federal Government’s estimated revenue in 2020 at N8.155 trillion, comprising oil revenue of N2.64 trillion, non-oil tax revenues of N1.81 trillion and other revenue of N3.7 trillion.

    Other estimates are N556.7 billion for statutory transfers, N2.45 trillion for debt servicing and provision of N296 billion as sinking fund.

    The 2020 budget is based on an oil production estimate of 2.18 million barrels per day, oil price benchmark of 57 dollars per barrel and an exchange rate of N305 to a dollar.

    Ahmed said that recurrent (non-debt) spending was expected to rise by 11.28 per cent, from N4.39 trillion in 2019 to N4.88 trillion in 2020.

    This, she said, would reflect in salaries and pensions, including provisions for implementation of the new minimum wage.

    Ahmed said that the overall budget deficit of N2.17 trillion represents 1.52 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and N1.64 trillion of it would be funded by both domestic and external borrowing.

    According to her, the external sources will provide N850 billion, while domestic sources will provide N744.99 billion.

    Citing the top 12 Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) capital allocations, she said the Ministry of Works and Housing was allocated N259.2 billion, Ministry of Power N127.67 billion, Ministry of Transportation N123.07 billion, Ministry of Education (including Universal Basic Education Commission) N162.74 billion.

    Others are Ministry of Defence N99.87 billion, Ministry of Health N90.98 billion, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development N79.79 billion and Ministry of Water Resources N78.34 billion.

    Some others are: Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development N45.45 billion, Ministry of Aviation N53.85 billion, Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment N41.34 billion and Ministry of Science and Technology N37.55 billion.

    She, however, said that there were key expenditures captured in the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF), but were not in the 2020 budget.

    “They are N61 billion for the Presidential Power Initiative, N1.22 trillion for federally funded projects in the oil and gas sector to be undertaken by NNPC on behalf of the federation.

    “Others are: N272 billion as transfers to Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) for infrastructure projects in tertiary institutions and N82.35 billion as transfer to Nigeria Sovereign Wealth Investment (NSIA) for Public Private Partnership/Presidential Infrastructure Development Fund (PIDF),” she said.

    For revenue, Ahmed said there were Strategic Revenue Growth Initiatives (SRGI) aimed at boosting revenue generation to meet targeted revenue to GDP ratio of 15 per cent.

    She said further that the SRGI would be implemented with increased vigour to improve revenue collection and expenditure management.

    She said that Nigeria must mobilise significant resources to invest in human capital development and critical infrastructure.

    “Some reforms will be tough but they must be done to look at the facts and be frank to ourselves.

    “However, we will engage the public sector in whatever we do, including any changes in taxes, with regards to rates or administration methods.”

  • Buhari is right; fuel subsidy is a fraud- Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa.

    President Muhammadu Buhari was Petroleum Minister from 1976-78 and Governor of North Eastern State, comprising today’s Bauchi, Gombe, Borno, Yobe, Taraba and Adamawa States. He was also Head of State for 20 months from December 31, 1983. So when as a presidential candidate he told the country in 2011 that the much touted fuel subsidy is a fraud, it was assumed he knew what he was talking about.

    He asked the basic question: “Who is subsidizing who?” He explained the cost process and told the public that fuel subsidy in an oil-soaked country like ours, is nothing but corruption; a brazen theft of public funds. As to how we can determine the true cost of a litre of fuel, he worked it out brilliantly: “the cost of one barrel at the wellhead and then the cost of transportation to the refinery, the cost of refining it and its cost at the pump.” Based on this basic economics he concluded: “If anybody says he is subsidizing anything, he is a fraud.”

    Last Wednesday, April 18, 2019, President Buhari presided over the meeting of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) and allowed himself to be cowed by the subsidy sharks into accepting the delusion that there is high fuel subsidy. He let himself be conned into believing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims of fuel subsidy which must be removed to allow higher fuel prices. As in the past, the hike will hurt the Nigerian people, negatively affect the economy and significantly, increase mass poverty. Already, under the Buhari Presidency, Nigeria, with 87 million citizens under the poverty line, has attained the dubious status of being the capital of world poverty.

    For the Buhari leadership, it is no longer a question of whether fuel prices will be increased; it is when. His Minister of Finance, Hajia Zainab Ahmed at a press briefing said: “We need to find how we can exit fuel subsidy. But how do we do that? We do that only when we have enough buffers to cushion the effects of the removal for our people…In some countries, they provide buses to transport people, in some countries they provide subsidies for people that are directly requiring the subsidies… We have not found a way to do it. What we are doing now, the subsidy, it is everybody that is benefiting, whereas it should be the people that are really vulnerable that need it.”

    Her speech contains four main ingredients. First, that Buhari and his government accept the contrived fuel subsidy. Secondly, that the administration agrees with the IMF that fuel subsidy is like cancer which must be removed. Thirdly, that fuel price would be hiked. Fourthly, because Buhari loves poor Nigerians, he wants to cushion the effects of the price hike.

    The issue of ‘cushioning” the effects, is a fraudulent old trick repeatedly played on Nigerians. For instance when in 1989 and 1991, the Babangida regime increased fuel prices, it introduced “cushioning” effects by launching a Bus Mass Transit Programme (MTP) and establishing the Directorate of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure (DFRRI) In the case of the Jonathan administration, after increasing prices on January 1, 2012, it established the Subsidy Reinvestment and EmpowermentProgram (SURE-P) as “cushioning” effect.

    The fraudulent logic in these cosmetic cushioning effects, is that subsidy favours only the rich, there is therefore the need to assist the poor to bear the pains. While the Babangida and Jonathan governments, were more straight forward on these issues, the Buhari government engages in camouflage. It is giving the impression that it is sorry for the people that is why it must first put cushioning effects in place before increasing the price. This does not tally with its previous actions. On May 11, 2016, it jacked fuel price from N87 to N145 without any so-called cushioning effects. Nigerians would not be unwise if they believe the Finance Minister when she said: “We should not be contemplating removing the subsidy because, indeed when we do, there will be people that will suffer.” In reality, it is like the tiger stalking its prey.

    In fact, while the Buhari government had claimed that it was not paying subsidy and that it had thereby saved the country N1.4 trillion annually, in truth, it was paying about that amount as fuel subsidy.

    Dr. Agbon Izielen a Nigerian oil expert based in Texas, United States in December 2011, put flesh on Buhari’s informed submission on fuel pricing: “At the refinery gate in Port Harcourt, the cost of a barrel of Qua Iboe crude oil is made up of the finding /development cost ($3.5/bbl) and a production/storage /transportation cost of $1.50 per barrel. Thus, at $5 per barrel, we can get Nigerian Qua Iboe crude to the refining gates at Port Harcourt and Warri. One barrel is 42 gallons or 159 litres.

    The price of 1 barrel of petrol at the Depot gate is the sum of the cost of crude oil, the refining cost and the pipeline transportation cost. Refining costs are at $12.6 per barrel and pipeline distribution costs are $1.50 per barrel. The Distribution Margins (Retailers, Transporters, Dealers, Bridging Funds, Administrative charges etc) are N15.49/litre or $16.58 per barrel. The true cost of 1 barrel of petrol at the Mobil filling station in Port Harcourt or anywhere else in Nigeria is therefore ($5 +$12.6+$1.5+$16.6) or $35.7 per barrel . This is equal to N33.36 per litre compared to the official price of N65 per litre. “

    Armed with such scientific analysis, the Trade Union Movement that December, 2011, met then President Goodluck Jonathan. I was the Acting General Secretary of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) The government technical team led by then Finance Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala tried to bamboozle us with all sorts of statistics, slides, videos and subsidy statements to justify the administration’s claims that the landing cost was N141 per litre.

    We punctured holes in the presentation and showed the statistics to be padded. We went further to ask Dr. Okonjo-Iweala that since the government claimed that it had a sixty percent local refining capacity, she should tell us the cost of a litre of locally refined fuel. She flared up protesting that she was not a liar. At that point, President Jonathan intervened, asking us to come with our statistics to the next meeting slated for January, 2012. But that was aborted as the government on January 1, 2012, increased a litre of fuel from N65 to N141. With that, mass street protests and strikes swept through the country. Although the waves did not sweep away the Jonathan government, it never recovered from the effects.

    Except the Yar’Adua administration, all governments since 1987, has feasted on the fuel subsidy fraud.

  • FG clears air on mounting debt profile, says no plan to remove fuel subsidy

    The Minister of Finance, Mrs Zainab Shamshuna Ahmed, has disclosed that Nigeria’s borrowing still remains at 19 per cent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and is low compared to Ghana, Brazil, South Africa, Egypt and Angola.
    The Minister made the statement while clearing the true position of reports surrounding the removal of fuel subsidy, which she maintained that there was no such plan, but was just an advise by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), at the just concluded Spring Meetings in Washington DC, United States of America, USA, as contained in a statement signed by the Special Adviser to the Minister of Finance on Media and Communications, Mr Paul Ella Abechi.
    According to her the difference on the issue of subsidy as compared to previous regimes where subsidy was paid to marketers, but this time around “NNPC is the sole importer of petroleum products, and so when they import is the cost of business and they deduct that cost before they remit the little money to the federation account. So that is completely different.”
    She also added that “It is more cost effective, it is cheaper and what is being done now is easier to monitor what transpired.”
    She said, “In the borrowing, we are still at 19 per cent to GDP our borrowing is still low. What is allowed by our Fiscal Responsibility Act is the maximum of 25 per cent of our GDP compared to other countries like; Ghana, Egypt, South Africa, Angola and Brazil and we are the lowest in terms of borrowing.
    However, the Minister acknowledged and pointed at the challenge of revenue generation by the country, “What we have is revenue problem and when revenues perform the aggregate rate of 55 per cent it hinders the ability to operate in our budget.
    “So it hinders our ability to service all categories of expenditures including salaries, allowances, capitals as well as debts.”
    Meanwhile, she made it known that the Ministry is not resting on its oars in regards to boosting the nation’s revenue.
    “So what we are doing at the Ministry of Finance is concentrating and enhancing of our revenue and collection capacities”, she stated.
    The Minister also maintained and assured Nigerians that there is no intention of subsidy removal as reported in some sections of the media, as government has not come up with any plan in that direction.
    “We are not there yet and we discuss this periodically under the Economic Management Team, but we have not found a formula that works for Nigeria and you know Nigeria is unique because what works in Ghana may not work in here. So it is still work in progress and so there is no intention to remove fuel subsidy at this time”, she assured.
  • Remove Subsidy and Die or Keep Subsidy and Die!!, By Henry Boyo

    Remove Subsidy and Die or Keep Subsidy and Die!!, By Henry Boyo

    BY HENRY BOYO

    The IMF Managing Director, Christine Lagarde, recommended, at the latest IMF/World Bank, Annual Spring meeting in Washington, that the removal of subsidy from petrol price would restrain Nigeria’s rapid debt accretion, so that erstwhile trillions of Naira, subsidy allocations could be deployed, annually, to improve the quality of health, education and infrastructure.

    The above advice, notwithstanding, IMF appears to wail more than the bereaved, as Nigeria’s Finance and Budget Ministers, continue to soothe public anxiety with sweet assurances that all is well.

    Nevertheless, in April 2019, Ibe Kachukwu, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, confirmed that despite the sustenance of a pump price of N145/litre, the actual landing cost of petrol, is now N180/litre, even though, petrol, presently sells (without subsidy) for almost $1.0/litre (i.e. over N300/litre) at filling stations in ECOWAS neighbour countries. The wide price variance has expectedly encouraged large scale cross border smuggling, and pushed Nigeria’s imports from the regular volume of about 30 to over 50 million litres daily. Indeed, when storage, transportation, and other ancillary costs, including sales margins are consolidated, Nigeria may well be flushing out well over N100/litre as subsidy on alleged 50 million litre/day present consumption, (i.e. subsidy of N5bn/day or N1.8trn annually!!).

    Indeed, with the Petrol Marketers’, long outstanding, substantial subsidy claims, which continue to earn interest charges, it is no surprise that NNPC has now become the sole importer of petrol. However, Finance Minister, Zainab Ahmed, obviously recognises the oppressive challenge of subsidy to prudent fiscal management, and therefore noted, after, the Federal Executive council meeting on 17th April, 2019, that “we need to find how we can exit fuel subsidy, but how do we do that?” In her words, “we have not found a way to do it; … on the subsidy issue: it is everybody that is benefitting rather than the vulnerable that need the help;” (therefore) “we have to find a formula that will work for Nigeria, and until then, we should not contemplate removing subsidy, because there will be people that will suffer.”

    The critical question, obviously, is what do we do now, that Government has readily admitted that they are clueless on the solution to the Albatross of fuel subsidy?

    The following are excerpts from the title “Fuel Subsidy as a Function of Illegal Exchange Rate Manipulation” which was first published on 03/04/2013; a way out of the fuel subsidy dilemma is explained in that piece. Please read on. (See www.lesleba.com & www.betternigerianow.com).

    “The above narrative suggests that there is no imminent solution to fuel subsidy imbroglio; however, such conclusion can only be correct if, the issue of naira exchange rate determination, is deliberately excluded from the permutations of solutions. A simple example will explain this observation; for example, if petrol (PMS) sells at the international commodity price of, say, about $1/litre; if Naira rate is N160=$1, this would translate to domestic price of about N160/litre, if however, naira exchanges for N80=$1, then the price equation will become 1litre=$1=N80, i.e. domestic petrol price, that is well below the current “tolerated” subsidized price of N97/litre in 2013! Consequently, N17/litre can be realized as sales tax, to ultimately generate well over N20bn surplus, in place of over N2000bn frittered subsidy payments, which will conversely now become available for positive infrastructural enhancement.”

    “Indeed, if PMS pump price remains unchanged at about $1/litre, but if naira exchange rate falls to N200=$1, the domestic pump price will invariably also rise to N200/litre to deepen subsidy payments beyond N4tn, i.e. if petrol price remains unchanged at N97/litre.”

    “The obvious question therefore is, how do we strengthen Naira rate, so that domestic fuel prices will fall and make subsidy unnecessary? The answer has been canvassed in several articles in this column. Notably, however, the naira exchange rate mechanism is clearly driven by the monopolistic posturing of CBN in the forex market! CBN’s unconstitutional tradition of capturing distributable dollar revenue and deliberately substituting same with naira allocations, at a contrived exchange rate, gives the Apex Bank control of over 80 per cent of dollar values traded in the foreign exchange market, and creates, therefrom, those economic distortions peculiar to monopolistic markets everywhere. The weaker Naira rate that also evolves from the existing system, ultimately compels higher fuel prices with the inevitable, related, humongous subsidy values.”

    “Nonetheless, there are unassailable reasons to believe that if distributable dollar revenue is paid to constitutional beneficiaries, with the instrument of dollar certificates (rather than bloated naira allocations at contrived rates), the naira exchange rate will become stronger and actually drive domestic fuel price below a level, which will, ultimately, eliminate any subsidy and also thereafter, open the door, to the establishment of private refineries.” (See also “The Avoidable Oppressive Burden of Fuel Subsidy” at www.lesleba.com &www.betternigerianow.com).

    The following excerpt is also from another article titled “Kill Subsidy before it Kills Us”; that piece was published on16/04/2018. Please read on.

    Consequently, our Economic Management team may have inadvertently boxed itself into a dilemma, as we seem incapable of reducing the price of PMS and kerosene consumption, despite the very heavy leakages from massive cross border smuggling. Meanwhile, government, has understandably, shied away from another confrontation with the masses, particularly after President Jonathan’s Administration survived the charged and volatile social tension, of the January 2012 pro-subsidy strike!

    “Thus, we may not require a soothsayer to correctly predict, as I have consistently maintained, for almost 2 decades, that inclusive economic growth or indeed diversification, with rapidly enhanced social infrastructure will clearly remain unattainable, so long as increasing debt service charges and fuel subsidy payments continue to account for the lion’s share of budgeted annual national expenditure!”

    “Expectedly, however, a progressive upward evolution of naira exchange rate to about N80/$1, will not only eliminate fuel subsidy, but will also enable government, just as in the UK and elsewhere, to earn a reasonable sales tax of about 10 per cent per litre; i.e. over N350m/day, minimum revenue, in place of N40/litre subsidy on over 35 million litres of fuel, allegedly, locally consumed and smuggled from Nigeria daily!”

    “Thus, with increasingly suicidal impact of fuel subsidy payments on economic growth and social welfare, no well-meaning Nigerian can sincerely stand on the sideline, especially if President Jonathan and the legislature remain, unfortunately, lethargic about this reform, despite the real possibility, that our present oil revenue inflow can induce a stronger naira rate and precipitate much lower fuel prices, devoid of any subsidy component, if only dollar revenue from crude export are infused into the domestic economy via dollar warrants, rather than the current poisonous system of creating fresh naira supply as allocations for distributable dollar revenue every month!”

    In conclusion, the next excerpt is from another title “Fuel Subsidy Dilemma: The Sensible Way Out” published on May 18th 2015 (Seewww.lesleba.com & www.betternigerianow.com).

    “Clearly, subsidy values will rise further if Naira continues its downward slide or if “fortuitously” or “unfortunately”, crude oil prices rebound once again!! For example, if the Naira is left to float as currently proposed by the Banker’s Committee, in December 2015, Naira will exchange for over N300=$1, particularly if the instigation of systemic excess Naira remains an abiding feature of CBN’s monetary strategy.”

    “Clearly, with such Naira depreciation, fuel prices will, inevitably spiral about 50 per cent above the price on which subsidy was initially calculated. Consequently, unless pump prices are adjusted upwards, Government’s subsidy burden will balloon, once again to bring us back to square one, where subsidy values exceed 20 per cent of annual federal budgets.”

    Postscript April 2019: Nothing has obviously changed as we have continued our reckless journey towards economic Armageddon! Regrettably, Naira rate is, as predicted, now N305-N360/$1, while the omens also portend that another Naira devaluation may be imminent.

    HAPPY EASTER!