Tag: Fuel Subsidy

  • Nigerians will suffer if we remove fuel subsidy – FG

    Nigerians will suffer if we remove fuel subsidy – FG

    …dismisses reports of subsidy removal

    The Minister of Finance, Mrs Zainab Ahmed, on Wednesday refuted media reports that the Federal Government had agreed with the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) advice on the removal of fuel subsidy.

    The minister stated this when she fielded questions from State House correspondents after the meeting of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) which was chaired by President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    She said that the government could only remove subsidy on fuel after having enough buffers to cushion the negative effects of the removal on ordinary citizens.

    “Let me say that last week when we had the IMF/World Bank meeting, there was just one interactive session with Nigerian journalists.

    “We didn’t have any session to discuss subsidy. It was in an interview that someone raised a question based on the Article 4 Report of the IMF.

    “What they asked was whether we were going to remove fuel subsidy and whether we agreed with the IMF’s conclusion on subsidy removal.

    “So, let me say that everywhere in the world where IMF does its review, it will always give advice because that’s the purpose of the review.

    “And their advice is when you give subsidy – whether it is fuel or power, their advice is always ‘look at how you can exit doing that’. And that’s the same advice they gave Nigeria.

    “So, when I was asked, I said we agreed with that advice. We need to find how we can exit fuel subsidy. But how do we do that?

    “We do that only when we have enough buffers to cushion the effects of the removal for our people.

    “It is up to the Executive in support with the legislature to agree on what those buffers are,’’ she added.

    The minister maintained that even though the government periodically discussed the issue of subsidy under the Economic Management Team, it never contemplated removing the subsidy.

    “We should not be contemplating removing the subsidy because, indeed when we do, there will be people that will suffer. So, we are not yet there.

    “We discussed this periodically under the Economic Management Team. But we still haven’t found a formula that works for Nigeria. And you know that Nigeria is unique. What works for Ghana might not work here.

  • Removing fuel subsidy is a ‘sin’ against Nigerians – PDP tells Buhari

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) President Muhammadu Buhari will committing a grievious sin against Nigerians if he agrees to removing the fuel subsidy as advised by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) last week.

    The PDP Deputy National Publicity Secretary, Mr Diran Odeyemi, told our correspondent in Abuja on Monday that President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration would be committing a sin to remove the subsidy which would inflict more hardship on Nigerians.

    He said the advice by the International Monetary Fund for the fuel subsidy removal would not be helpful to Nigerians.

    Odeyemi said, “It is a sin to add to the burden of the suffering masses of Nigeria, especially at this time when food, employment and security of lives and property have been a problem.

    The IMF dictation, for whatever reason, cannot work in Nigeria, and I am sure Nigerians will reject any hardship at this time.”

    IMF Managing Director, Christine Lagarde, had on Thursday, during the opening ceremony of the World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings in Washington DC advised Nigeria to remove fuel subsidy and use the savings to upgrade social infrastructure.

  • Disregard IMF’s advice on fuel subsidy removal, NUPENG, PENGASSAN tells FG

    Workers in the oil and gas sector on Sunday advised President Muhammadu Buhari to shun any counsel that would destabilise or cause chaos in the economy.

    The Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) and the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association (PENGASSAN) gave the advice in a statement in Lagos.

    The statement was signed by Mr Okugbawa Lumumba, PENGASSAN General Secretary and Afolabi Olawale, NUPENG’s General Secretary.

    The Managing Director, International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde had on April 12 called on the Federal Government to remove fuel subsidy because of low revenue mobilisation that existed in terms of tax to Gross Domestic Product.

    They said that the IMF advice on how to recover Nigerian economy was worrisome as it had become counter productive.

    “Any economic policy that is devoid of human feelings can lead to more social dislocations and upheavals, which will later become counterproductive as currently experienced,’’ it said.

    The unions said that IMF had created panic in the country with associated hoarding of petroleum products, panic buying, skyrocketed increases in prices of goods and services in the country.

    It said that earlier, the IMF chief praised the significant progress the nation had made in terms of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) that increased by 1.9 per cent in 2018 from 0.8 per cent in 2017.

    It said that the IMF was not considering the pains and agonies the people went through to achieve the gains of 2018, with almost two-thirds of the world’s hungriest people among Nigerians.

    The unions also cautioned that imposing more stringent reforms in domestic revenue mobilisation including increase in VAT and securing more domestic oil revenues through subsidy removal was an attempt to destabilise the nation.

    The unions in the statement appealed to President Buhari to put in mind the current hardship the people were going through in their collective journey to economic recovery.

  • Nigeria reacts as IMF insists on removal of fuel subsidy

    Nigeria reacts as IMF insists on removal of fuel subsidy

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) Thursday repeated its age-long advice to Nigeria – remove fossil fuel subsidy and deploy savings from the scheme to fix social infrastructure.

    IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde gave the advice at the opening of the ongoing World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings in Washington DC .

    She urged Nigeria to establish Social protection Safety Net to help the government meet the needs of people at the lower cadre of the society. About $5.2 trillion has so far been sent on fuel subsidies and the consequences thereof, according to her.

    Ms Lagarde said: “I will give you the general principle. For various reasons and as a general principle, we believe that removing fossil fuel subsidies is the right way to go. And the Fiscal Affairs department has actually identified how much would have been save financially, but also in terms of human life if there had been the right price on carbon emission as of 2015. Numbers are quite staggering. If that was to happen, then there would be more public spending available to build hospitals, roads, provide educational facilities and lift more people out of poverty.”

    She called for more public spending being made available to build hospitals, roads, schools and to support education and health for the people. “Now, how this is done is the more complicated path because there has to be a social protection safety net that is in place so that the most exposed in the population do not take the brunt of those removal of subsidies principle.

    So that is the position we take. I would add as a footnote as far as Nigeria is concerned that, with the low revenue mobilisation that exists in the country in terms of tax to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Nigeria is amongst the lowest. A real effort has to be done in order to maintain a good public finance situation for the country. And in order to direct investment towards health, education, and infrastructure,” she said.

    She spoke of the global economy’s uncertainty, adding that the world was a year ago talking about synchronised growth even as 75 per cent of the global economy was going through that phase.

    On global economic growth, Ms Lagarde said the forecast for this year is 3.3 percent. “But we contend that we are at a delicate moment. And this expected rebound from 3.3 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2020 is precarious and subject to downside risks, ranging from unresolved trade tensions, high debt in some sectors and countries, both public and corporate.”

    On borrowing from China, she said both the World Bank and the IMF were working together to bring about more transparency and be better able to identify debt, terms and conditions, volumes and maturity.

    And this is an endeavour that we will pursue together and which the G20 has actually asked us to develop. So we are doing that, we are constantly encouraging both borrowers and lenders to align as much as possible with the debt principles that have been approved by the G20 and that we have endorsed internally and developed ourselves. It is clear that any debt restructuring programmes going forward in the years to come will be more complicated than debt restructuring programmes that were conducted 10 years ago simply because of the multiplicity of lenders and the fact that not all public debt is offered by members of the Paris Club, for instance, which does not mean to say that any debt from a lender outside the Paris Club is an issue as long as the principles are adhered to, the work that we eventually have to do with countries is then facilitated. There is also a myriad of nonpublic lenders that complicates the matter seriously. But that is another story,” she said.

    Meanwhile, the Minister of Finance, Mrs Zainab Ahmed says the Federal Government will look into gradual removal of fuel subsidy as part of strategies to boost revenue.

    Ahmed said this on Thursday on the sideline of the IMF/World Bank meetings currently taking place in Washington DC, United States of America.

    Ahmed made the disclosure while reacting to the IMF’s advice to Nigeria and other countries who still subsidise fossil fuel to stop doing so.

    According to the IMF, fuel subsidy removal would help boost revenue and improve government’s spending to build more hospitals, roads, schools, and to support education and health for the people.

    It’s good advice, but we have to implement it in a way that will be successful as well as sustainable.

    We are not in the position to wake up one night and just remove subsidy. We have to educate the people, we have to show the Nigerian citizens what the replacement for this subsidy will be.

    So, we have a lot of work to do because subsidy removal has to be gradual and the public has to be well informed,” she said.

    Ahmed said that since the IMF/World Bank meetings started, she has had high-level meetings on taxation and discussions on global economy.

    We spoke on the need to build more fiscal buffers because of the slow down in global economic growth and partly by the natural incidences that are happening around the world like the cyclone in Southern Africa.

    We are discussing between ourselves on how we can better manage our finances and also how we must curtail the increases in our debt.

    For Nigeria, we are asking the World Bank to review some of the initiatives that involves them looking at implementation systems when they are providing funding for infrastructure.

    We understand that it’s well intended but we have informed them that they need to review its implementation, so that we are not overly slowed down because of the new procedures,” she said.

  • IMF urges Nigeria to remove fuel subsidy

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) yesterday repeated its age-long advice to Nigeria – remove fossil fuel subsidy and deploy savings from the scheme to fix social infrastructure.

    IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde gave the advice at the opening of the ongoing World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings in Washington DC .

    She urged Nigeria to establish Social protection Safety Net to help the government meet the needs of people at the lower cadre of the society. About $5.2 trillion has so far been sent on fuel subsidies and the consequences thereof, according to her.

    Ms Lagarde said: “I will give you the general principle. For various reasons and as a general principle, we believe that removing fossil fuel subsidies is the right way to go. And the Fiscal Affairs department has actually identified how much would have been save financially, but also in terms of human life if there had been the right price on carbon emission as of 2015. Numbers are quite staggering. If that was to happen, then there would be more public spending available to build hospitals, roads, provide educational facilities and lift more people out of poverty.”

    She called for more public spending being made available to build hospitals, roads, schools and to support education and health for the people. “Now, how this is done is the more complicated path because there has to be a social protection safety net that is in place so that the most exposed in the population do not take the brunt of those removal of subsidies principle.

    “So that is the position we take. I would add as a footnote as far as Nigeria is concerned that, with the low revenue mobilisation that exists in the country in terms of tax to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Nigeria is amongst the lowest. A real effort has to be done in order to maintain a good public finance situation for the country. And in order to direct investment towards health, education, and infrastructure,” she said.

    She spoke of the global economy’s uncertainty, adding that the world was a year ago talking about synchronised growth even as 75 per cent of the global economy was going through that phase.

    On global economic growth, Ms Lagarde said the forecast for this year is 3.3 percent. “But we contend that we are at a delicate moment. And this expected rebound from 3.3 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2020 is precarious and subject to downside risks, ranging from unresolved trade tensions, high debt in some sectors and countries, both public and corporate.”

    On borrowing from China, she said both the World Bank and the IMF were working together to bring about more transparency and be better able to identify debt, terms and conditions, volumes and maturity.

    “And this is an endeavour that we will pursue together and which the G20 has actually asked us to develop. So we are doing that, we are constantly encouraging both borrowers and lenders to align as much as possible with the debt principles that have been approved by the G20 and that we have endorsed internally and developed ourselves. It is clear that any debt restructuring programmes going forward in the years to come will be more complicated than debt restructuring programmes that were conducted 10 years ago simply because of the multiplicity of lenders and the fact that not all public debt is offered by members of the Paris Club, for instance, which does not mean to say that any debt from a lender outside the Paris Club is an issue as long as the principles are adhered to, the work that we eventually have to do with countries is then facilitated. There is also a myriad of nonpublic lenders that complicates the matter seriously. But that is another story,” she said.

  • The Self-Destructive, Unforced Error of Fuel Subsidy, By Henry Boyo

    The Self-Destructive, Unforced Error of Fuel Subsidy, By Henry Boyo

    BY HENRY BOYO

    “The most important question now is: For how long must misguided government economic policies ruin our nation while we do nothing? This year, like others, has only twelve months. At least five will be spent with nobody thinking about how to prevent more deterioration. The remaining seven months cannot possibly reverse the accumulated damage – unless a new and radical solution is found”. An excerpt from ‘As Dangote goes, so does Nigerian economy’ by Dele Sobowale, Vanguard Newspaper, Monday, January 21, 2019.

    The above quote is probably synonymous with the popular definition of insanity as “the continuous repetition of the same process with the same wrong results, and still expect a positive difference at each turn.”

    Regrettably, it is much easier to identify several policies, in which results are not congruent with the declared objectives of government. However, the continuous sustenance of fuel subsidy, probably stands out as one of the most distortional, counter-productive policies, which induce socially and economically destructive outcomes for our country.

    Admittedly, the abolition of subsidy will immediately spike fuel price from the regulated current pump price of N145/litre ($0.5litre) to between N305-360/litre (about $1.0/litre), to match the prevailing price range in Ghana, Togo, Benin, Cameroon, etc,. However, the pass through impact of doubling petrol price, on transportation and ultimately, on the general price level of goods and services, would clearly be traumatic for most income earners. Predictably, therefore, the expected economic benefit from the imminent increase in the minimum wage, will similarly become, diffused by the compounded inflationary impact of higher fuel prices and the almost doubled nominal incomes of workers. Furthermore, there are genuine concerns that if petrol pricing is totally deregulated, domestic fuel price will invariably climb, especially, if crude oil price remains above $60/barrel, or indeed, if Naira rate, further depreciates, even if rising crude oil price and output, fortuitously significantly increase CBN’s consolidated foreign reserves.

    It is arguable, therefore, that the trigger of higher petrol prices and the impact of the imminent minimum wage increase, will rapidly fuel inflation, constrain consumer demand to increase unemployment and deepen poverty.

    It is no wonder, therefore, that higher fuel prices, often, spontaneously pitches governments against the people; furthermore, higher fuel price is predictably also the precursor to higher price for bread, and the public angst against such a combustible inflationary mix, may ultimately pose great threat to any government. It is for this reason that governments everywhere are reluctant to raise fuel price, until push actually comes to shove, when increasing annual budget deficit and steeply rising debt, compel them to bite the bullet of hiking fuel price.

    There is so far no known study of the opportunity cost of sustaining the present fuel subsidy regime, in Nigeria; nonetheless, any report of such evaluation would most certainly be gruesome and alarming. For example, in 2017 alone, in the absence of meaningful output from government’s refineries, Nigeria reportedly imported almost 23 billion litres of petroleum products worth well over N3tn (about $10bn). Nonetheless, there are, however, good reasons to believe that there is significant cross border smuggling of Nigeria’s petrol imports, because of the considerable difference, of almost $0.50cent/litre between petrol price in Nigeria and elsewhere in ECOWAS neighbour States. In this regard, Senate President, Bukola Saraki, raised an alarm, in a recent Press interview, in January 2019, challenging official reports of daily fuel consumption rates of 40-50 million litres, in place of the steady 25-30 million litres/day, traditionally, consumed for most of the last decade or so.

    Incidentally, the NNPC MD, Maikanti Baru, had also expressed similar concern, last year, when he publicly decried the proliferation of over 2000 petrol stations and tank farms within a few kilometers from Nigeria’s borders. Baru, consequently, visited the Comptroller General of Customs and enjoined the Service to seriously strategise on stopping wholesale smugglers of Nigeria’s fuel imports, and thereby halt the heavy hemorrhage of possibly, well over $1bn annually from our treasury.

    It is clearly disturbing that despite Nigeria’s significant, recurring, annual budget deficit, and over $73bn debt burden, with other expensive borrowing plans in the pipeline in 2019, the economies of our ECOWAS neighbour States may possibly still freely enjoy upto 50 percent ‘Awoof’ from the estimated, over N1tn ($3bn), that Nigeria reportedly, expends on subsidy values annually! Incidentally, it is on record that fuel was sold in this country for as little as 6kobo/litre without subsidy between 1966-1975 and sold below N1.00/litre until 1993. In retrospect, fuel subsidy crept into our economic lexicon, as a result of massive Naira devaluation between 1995-93, and thereafter. In other words, the real driver of fuel price is most probably, the Naira exchange rate; weaker Naira rates will predictably, produce higher petrol prices while, stronger Naira exchange rate will conversely induce lower fuel prices. Thus, unless the Naira exchange rate improves, it will clearly remain a challenge to bring down fuel price and successfully restrain inflation and also stop fuel smugglers.

    Admittedly, the popular belief, is that petrol price will fall, particularly, when crude oil price also falls, but this is not necessarily so; in Nigeria’s experience, lower crude prices may actually sustain much higher fuel prices, particularly, if the Naira exchange rate continues to slide. In practice, the Naira exchange rate will invariably depreciate, under the present arrangement, whenever crude price and output fall and deflates CBN’s caché of dollar reserves.

    Ironically, Naira exchange rate will still fall, even if crude oil price/output increase and swells the size of CBN’s dollar reserves, so that, more dollar revenue ultimately, becomes available for the usual substitution, with “criminally” bloated Naira allocations which will, invariably, weaken the Naira exchange rate in a monopolistic market, in which CBN consistently auctions small rations of dollars twice weekly, to determine the operative Naira/dollar exchange rate. In essence, this price mechanism artificially protects the dollar rate, and one may therefore be tempted to see the CBN as the Father Protector of the dollar rather than its own Naira!

    However, CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele is clearly optimistic that the commissioning of Dangote’s 650,000 barrel capacity/day refinery complex in the Lekki Free Trade Zone, next year, would reduce pressure of dollar demand for petrol imports by possibly over $10bn annually. Consequently, Emefiele hopes that, once the refinery and petrochemical complex are up and running, the Federal Government and other forex users including bankers and importers will begin to source forex from the Dangote Group.

    This may indeed be so, but there is no realistic permutation of how forex availability from Dangote will strengthen the Naira exchange rate and bring down fuel prices. In reality, so long as the CBN continues to determine the Naira exchange rate by auctioning rations of dollars in a market, that is admittedly, seemingly eternally flooded with surplus Naira supply which will propel inflation, the Naira exchange rate will remain weak, and petrol prices will also continue to rise and ultimately compel the need for the provision of a fresh round of subsidy in petrol pricing.

    Expectedly, the sustenance of price regulation has primarily discouraged well over 30 intending investors, with federal government licenses to operate refineries, from proceeding with their plans.

    Furthermore, despite the crying need of manufacturers and SMES for reasonably priced funds, well over 30 percent of total bank credit is often tied up, for extended periods, in loans for fuel imports.

    Similarly, the CBN also has its own bag of odious idle debts on which it still pays primarily the Money Deposit Banks well over 15 percent in order to restrain inflation.

    It is however noteworthy that the CBN Governor recently cautioned government on its steady accumulation of foreign loans. In practice, foreign loans may indeed be cheaper with rates below 10 percent, but such foreign loans may require much more substantial Naira values to repay, particularly if the Naira exchange rate crashes again before payments become due.

  • NNPC spends N623.16bn on fuel subsidy in 11 months

    NNPC spends N623.16bn on fuel subsidy in 11 months

    Despite claims to the contrary, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has reported to the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) that it spent N623.16 billion on under recovery otherwise known as subsidy from January to November, 2018.

    The report to FAAC was made at the last meeting in Abuja where revenue generating agencies gave account of their performances in the year.

    The NNPC in its report dated 19th December, 2018 revealed that it also has an arrears of N67.23 billion for deductions made from FAAC.

    The report said there is a total FAAC deduction of N676.49 billion comprising of N599.74 billion as under recovery for Direct Sales Direct Purchase (DSDP) arrangement and the sum of N23.43 billion as under recovered from it’s refineries.

    The document said that the amount incurred by the NNPC as under-recovery was deducted from the Federation Account as follows: January N45.78 billion, February N59.51 billion, March N34.03 billion, April N77.9 billion and May N88.9 billion.

    Breakdown of the N623.16 billion under-recovery showed that the sum of N51.24 billion was incurred in January while February, March and April recorded N58.66 billion, N36.09 billion, and N82.4 billion respectively.

    In the month of May, the amount of under-recovery incurred by NNPC on PMS dropped to N36.87 billion but rose to N53.41 billion in June, N52.43 billion in July and N63.18 billion in the month of August.

    In the month of June 2018, the corporation deducted about N68.6 billion, in July, August, September, October and November the Corporation made deductions of N52.5 billion, N60.6 billion, N71.56 billion, N51.18 billion and N65.86 billion respectively.

    Apart from the deductions from FAAC, the amount spent on subsidy or as under-recovery by the NNPC went up to N71.8 billion in September before dropping again to N51.18 billion and N65.86 billion in the months of October and November respectively.

    From the document it shows that the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is currently subsidising Premium Motor Spirit, popularly known as petrol through its under recovery arrangements.

     

  • The Oppressive Folly of Fuel Subsidy, By Henry Boyo

    The Oppressive Folly of Fuel Subsidy, By Henry Boyo

    Petroleum product Marketers and Depot Owners Associations, gave the Government, a 7 day ultimatum last week, to redeem their long overdue balance for over ₦800bn for fuel, already sold at Government regulated price of ₦145/litre.

    The ₦800bn, was reportedly consolidated from the difference between government’s regulated price and the actual open market price of petrol sans subsidy; the marketers are also demanding compensation for exchange rate differentials and relief from the extended burden of interest on their bank loans. Instructively, the open market fuel price in ECOWAS neighbour Countries is, presently around $1/ litre, i.e. between ₦305 – ₦360; this is in place of the regulated price of ₦145/ litre in Nigeria. The much cheaper petrol price, has expectedly encouraged large scale cross border smuggling of Nigeria’s petrol imports to neighbor nations in the Republics of Benin, Togo, Cameroun, Niger and Chad, and these countries’ economies have, invariably, become significant beneficiaries of Nigeria’s oppressive and distortional petrol subsidy.

    Consequently, Nigeria may alarmingly be consuming between 50 – 60million litres of petrol daily, rather than the 30million litres /day consumption before Naira was devalued from ₦190/$ to ₦305 to ₦360/$ in 2017; incidentally NNPC/ CBN management, have never been categorical on the applicable exchange rate for fuel imports.

    Nonetheless, Petrol marketers have threatened to cut back on operations with mass lay-off of staff, if government does not quickly save their Companies from shylock creditor banks, which continue to calculate, disenabling double digit interest rates on their overdue loans.

    However, Nigerians must be concerned that the impasse between marketers, government and banks, will not once again, trigger the severe challenges endured, in unending fuel queues between December 2017 and January 2018.

    Nevertheless, NNPC, which has, since become sole importer of petrol, has assured Nigerians of adequate local stock to sustain supply. Notably, however, even such excess stock may be of little use without adequate operational distribution channels. Ironically, hundreds of billions of Naira already spent on overhauling our refineries, has regrettably, not brought significant relief to domestic fuel supply.

    The above title “The oppressive folly of fuel subsidy” was first published in May 2015; a summary of that article follows hereafter.

    “The data released on fuel subsidy outlays from responsible government agencies have, overtime, regrettably remained divergent.

    The above notwithstanding, what is clear however, is that we are spending a disproportionate amount of Federal budget to fund subsidy payments, of about N500bn or about 10% of annual Federal budgets since 2011. Incidentally, despite the, severe social deprivations associated with dismal infrastructural deficit, critical sectors such as Education and Health, were never so favoured.

    Infact, according to the Co-ordinating Minister, subsidy values, which were never captured in annual appropriation bills, have nevertheless been settled ultimately by her Ministry without recourse to Legislative approval as constitutionally required.

    This tradition of impunity without Legislative consent has been stepped up, with possibly, over N200bn additional commitment which was recklessly incurred this year as penalty for bank interest on delayed payments and exchange rate differentials on a ‘core’ subsidy bill of N40bn according to Thomas Olawore, the Executive Secretary of the Major Petroleum Marketers (see report titled: Daily Subsidy on PMS rises to N1.7bn on Pg. 38 on Punch newspaper edition of 30th of April, 2015).

    Ultimately, the oppressive folly of government’s subsidy strategy may become embarrassingly glaring when we become constrained to obtain high priced loans to fund our debilitating subsidy habit.

    Conversely, however, if subsidy is abolished with the prevailing crude oil price and Naira exchange rate, fuel price will rapidly shoot up to about N150/litre, and ultimately push inflation uncomfortably closer to 10%. Consequently, unless all wages and salaries rise by 10% annually, income earners may lose 50% of the purchasing value of their Naira incomes every five years. Thus, the existing minimum wage of N18000/month, may well become less than N9,000 since it was established in 2011.

    Furthermore, consumer demand will contract if inflation spirals and constrain employers of labour to scale down on their workforce and clearly, worsen the already disenabling rate of unemployment.

    The incoming administration may predictably seek a truce as usual with Organised Labour to share the burden of subsidy, by raising the current fuel price from N87 to about N120/litre instead of a market price of about N150/litre without subsidy.

    Regrettably, however, this arrangement will collapse as soon as crude oil prices rise above the current $60/barrel and, or the dollar exchange rate rises above N197/$, as such price movement will push deregulated petrol price well beyond N150/litre and create a wider margin of subsidy than the N30/litre earlier projected.

    Furthermore, if CBN’s rapidly depleting reserves also increase pressure on dollar demand, dollar exchange rate would simultaneously spiral closer to or above the current black market rate of N220=$. In such event, fuel prices will invariably rise and related subsidy values will again increase to precipitate the usual train of inadequate funding, delayed payments, etc, etc, until a brokered resolution between government and Labour, again sets in motion another cycle of folly with another agreement for partial subsidy in fuel pricing.

    Sadly, almost 50% of forex earnings will be repatriated to foreign suppliers as payment for the 40m litres fuel imports consumed daily.

    Arguably, a huge reduction in such external payments may be possible, if more refineries are built or if at least existing government’s refineries become fully operational. However, even if government refineries, operate at optimal capacity, the ex-local refinery fuel cost will not be significantly different from the f.o.b. prices invoiced by overseas suppliers (+ about 5% freight cost) unless crude oil supplied to local refineries is also subsidized.

    Thus, whether crude oil prices rise significantly or Naira exchange rate further depreciates, fuel pump price will faithfully spiral uncomfortably to make the accommodation of subsidy inevitable. Besides, until price regulation is abolished, investors will continue to stay away from establishing new domestic refineries because of the challenges of the subsidy scheme. However, savvy investors, such as Dangote, who establish new refineries, would hedge their investments by selling their products strictly in dollars ex-refinery gate to marketers who would still need to source the required forex for their purchases; consequently, the forex outlay for fuel will still remain substantial even if new private refineries are established.

    Conversely, however, owners of domestic refineries would readily price their fuel in Naira if the Naira re-establishes a reputation as a safe store of value, rather than a currency that is perennially beleaguered and remains on life support. Instructively, Naira exchange rate will continue its slide and make abolition of subsidy a challenge, so long as our domestic money market remains eternally flush with ever-surplus Naira, which is deliberately created by CBN to chase the rationed dollars auctioned by the same Apex Bank!

     

  • N800b subsidy debts: Senate gives FG two-week ultimatum

    Worried by possible fuel supply crisis in the country, the Nigerian Senate has issued a two-week ultimatum to the federal government to pay off the N800 billion subsidy debts owed oil marketers.

    TheNewsGuru (TNG) reports Senate issued the ultimatum on Thursday, urging the FG to as a matter of urgency direct relevant agencies to pay the subsidy arrears as approved by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) and the National Assembly (NASS) within two weeks.

    The oil marketers had written Senate Committee on Petroleum Downstream over non-payment of the subsidy arrears by the FG, and had on Sunday in Lagos gave the FG a seven-day ultimatum to settle the outstanding debts totaling N800 billion, failing which, depots would cease operation across the country.

    The marketers, comprising Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA) and Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs), said failure to meet the deadline would force its members to disengage workers from depots.

    Senator Kabir Marafa, who read the oil marketers letter at Senate plenary session on Thursday, raised the motion on urgent need to avert the looming crisis in fuel supply due to non-payment of the fuel subsidy arrears to the independent marketers.

    “The Committee on Petroleum Downstream received a letter from DAPMAN on the non-payment of subsidy arrears by the Federal Government. If the demands are not met, they will shut down in 7 days,” Senator Marafa said.

    In their contributions, Senators Yahaya Abdullahi, Barnabas Gemade and Ahmad Babba Kaita pleaded with leadership of the Senate to prevail to avert the looming fuel supply crisis.

    “I am a member of this particular Committee, we had a long meeting, we have gone through all the necessary procedures and offices. We have to make sure these funds are released so we can avert this strike,” Senator Abdullahi said.

    While Senator Gemade stated that “Withholding of these payments has nothing to do with the National Assembly, it is the executives that are responsible, the necessary ministries and agencies should pay DAPMAN so as to avert this crisis”, Senator Kaita said, “This motion is timely, it is a matter that affects our lives in it’s totality. Christmas is coming so this should be averted. This Senate should do anything humanly possible to stop this”.

    TNG reports the Senate in its resolution urged the oil marketers to as a matter of national interest rescind the earlier decision of the one week ultimatum to give the FG a little more time to look into their demands.

    The Senate also urged the FG to engage marketers and agree on the subsidy claims to avoid possible fuel supply crisis.

     

  • Fuel crisis looms as marketers write Senate over N800b subsidy debts

    Fuel crisis looms as marketers write Senate over N800b subsidy debts

    As Nigeria nears the yuletide, the nation may suffer yet another fuel supply crisis as oil marketers have written Senate Committee on Petroleum Downstream over non-payment of subsidy arrears by the federal government.

    TheNewsGuru (TNG) reports the oil marketers had on Sunday in Lagos gave the FG a seven-day ultimatum to settle outstanding debts totaling N800 billion, failing which, depots would cease operation across the country.

    The marketers, comprising Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN), Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA) and Independent Petroleum Products Importers (IPPIs), said failure to meet the deadline would force its members to disengage workers from depots.

    Senator Kabir Marafa, who read the oil marketers letter at Senate plenary session on Thursday, raised a motion on the urgent need to avert the looming crisis in fuel supply due to non-payment of the fuel subsidy arrears to the independent marketers.

    “The Committee on Petroleum Downstream received a letter from DAPMAN on the non-payment of subsidy arrears by the Federal Government. If the demands are not met, they will shut down in 7 days,” Senator Marafa said.

    In their contributions, Senators Yahaya Abdullahi, Barnabas Gemade and Ahmad Babba Kaita pleaded with leadership of the Senate to prevail to avert the looming fuel supply crisis.

    “I am a member of this particular Committee, we had a long meeting, we have gone through all the necessary procedures and offices. We have to make sure these funds are released so we can avert this strike,” Senator Abdullahi said.

    While Senator Gemade stated that “Withholding of these payments has nothing to do with the National Assembly, it is the executives that are responsible, the necessary ministries and agencies should pay DAPMAN so as to avert this crisis”, Senator Kaita said, “This motion is timely, it is a matter that affects our lives in it’s totality. Christmas is coming so this should be averted. This Senate should do anything humanly possible to stop this”.

    Confirming the seven-day notice, Mr Patrick Etim, Legal Adviser to IPPI had said banks have taken over investments and assets of oil marketers over the unpaid debts.

    According to Etim, marketers have no choice than to ask their workers to stay at home over unpaid salary arrears due to huge subsidy debts owed by the government.

    “The only way to salvage the situation is for government to pay the oil marketers the outstanding debts through cash option instead of promissory note being proposed.

    “As I speak, nothing has been done several months after assurances received by government saying it would pay off the outstanding debts.

    “The oil marketers have requested that forex differential and interest component of government’s indebtedness to marketers be calculated up to December 2018 and be paid within next seven days from the date of the letter sent to the government,” he said.

    Etim said that several thousand jobs were on the line in the industry, as oil marketers began cut-down of their workforce due to inability to pay salaries.

    “At the inception of the current administration, marketers engaged the government with the view to secure approval for all outstanding subsidy-induced debts handed over to the current administration,” he said.

    The counsel said that the current administration paid part of the debts with a substantial portion of the subsidy interest and foreign exchange differential still pending.

    The Executive Secretary of DAPPMA, Mr Olufemi Adewole, also confirmed the seven-day ultimatum notice.

    Adewole disclosed that the oil marketers on Nov. 28 served the ultimatum letter on the Debt Management Office (DMO), Minister of Finance, Chairman, Senate Committee on Petroleum Downstream, Department of State Services and Minister of State, Petroleum Resources.

    “We urge the DMO to process and pay marketers in cash for their outstanding forex differentials and interest component claims, together with the amount already approved by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) and the National Assembly.

    “Marketers are not in a position to discount payment on the subsidy-induced debt owed as proposed by DMO.

    “The expected payment is made up of bank loans, outstanding admin charges due to PPPRA, outstanding bridging fund due Petroleum Equalisation Fund (Management) Board and in a few cases AMCON judgment debts.

    “We urge that the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved payment instrument, (the promissory note) be substituted with cash and paid through our bankers to stop the avoidable waste of public funds through these debts accruing interest,” he said.