Tag: Government

  • COVID-19: CAN makes fresh demands from government

    COVID-19: CAN makes fresh demands from government

    The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Ekiti chapter, on Saturday appealed to the state government to allow the conduct of multiple services by Churches as part of efforts to check the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

    Rev. Fr. Peter Olowolafe, the State Chairman of CAN, made the appeal in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria, (NAN) in Ado-Ekiti.

    NAN reports that the deadline for worship centres to meet certain conditions before reopening for normal services expired on Friday August 14.

    NAN investigation revealed that mosques on Friday commenced normal Juma’at (Friday congregational) prayers with full adherence to COVID-19 protocols such as social distancing and washing of hands with water and sanitisers.

    Olowolafe, who expressed the readiness of the Churches to reopen for normal devotional services on Sunday, appealed for the review of the COVID-19 protocols as they affect Churches.

    According to him, Churches should be allowed to conduct multiple services in view of the limited worship hours occasioned by COVID-19 pandemic.

    “We are also appealing to the government to allow full attendance and participation of children in Church services as we have put in place solid arrangement for them.

    “Children are known to have separate arrangement for their Church services; all we need to do is to ensure strict adherence to the laid down COVID-19 protocols and conditions.

    “We, as leaders of Churches in the state, want to assure government that the granting of this appeal will not in any way jeopardise the efforts toward curbing the spread of COVID-19 in the state.

    “We are trying as much as possible to abide with the conditions, but leaving the children and the people above 65 at home calls for a review.

    “It is risky leaving children at home. It is like telling the parents not to come.

    “Even in Lagos State which is the epicenter of the pandemic in Nigeria, the governor has opened the Church and by Sunday, they can have multiple services.

    “Our position is that in Ekiti, having two hours service for people above 12 and below 65, is not just enough,” he said.

  • Reopening schools will worsen spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria, NMA warns

    Reopening schools will worsen spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria, NMA warns

    The Nigeria Medical Association, (NMA), has warned that it is risky to re-open schools with effect from tomorrow after four months of closure because it could worsen community spreading of the coronavirus pandemic.

    National President of the apex medical association, Prof Innocent Ujah, who gave the warning on Saturday while speaking with newsmen ahead of schools’ resumption by exit students on Monday, said there were no evidence to show government’s readiness to re-open the schools.

    The Federal Government on July 27 after a virtual consultative meeting between the Federal Ministry of Education, the Commissioners for Education in each of the 36 states of the Federation, the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT), the proprietors of private schools and Chief Executives of examination bodies unanimously agreed to reopen schools on August 4.

    But the NMA boss stated that with figures from the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) showing that Nigeria now has about 43,000 cases of COVID-19 with 878 deaths, it is still precarious to re-open schools for now.

    Prof Ujah, who is a former Director-General of the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research and Development, (NIMRD), warned the government to learn from the mistake of South Africa which was forced to close schools after its COVID-19 fatalities spiked shortly after they re-opened.

    “We are not comfortable with plans to reopen schools and we have warned government against the dangers of re-opening them, because we are not ready.

    Even at general level, we are not complying with NCDC protocols of social distancing, regular hand washing, use of sanitizers and face masks. “We believe that children will be put at a great risk if schools are re-opened, unless they (government and school proprietors) are ready. If they are ready they can go on, but we don’t believe that they are ready.

    “We believe we should avoid the mistake of South Africa that re-opened its schools but was forced to close when the fatalities and infection cases rose geometrically.

    Ghana also re-opened and was forced to close, although some have made reference to the fact that it has re-opened, but the circumstances that led to re-opening in Ghana should be studied because it is not enough to import cut-andpaste ideas,” Ujah warned.

    He said even if the private schools are ready, the same level of readiness cannot be said of public schools which have observable infrastructural deficiency, even as he expressed apprehension about how the schools would be monitored to ensure compliance with safety protocols.

    Ujah warned that if any of the children or teachers get infected with the virus, they would automatically transmit it to their families, and that would further exacerbate community spreading, adding that the same parents would be the first to castigate government for not doing enough.

    “In my opinion, government was stampeded to consent to re-open the schools, because of the outcry of many people, including governors, parents, teachers and school proprietors; but this is not about emotion.

    They must be prepared. We are not saying they should not re-open schools, but they should be ready. That is NMA’s view. “Remember when NMA said the nation should lockdown and suspend all international flights, (NMA was the first professional body that so advised), the Federal Government did not listen to us and now you have seen the consequences. That initial inaction is now having a telling effect on all of us,” he said.

  • FGN A Government which cannot learn from its mistakes, By Dele Sobowale

    FGN A Government which cannot learn from its mistakes, By Dele Sobowale

    “Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other.

    US President John Kennedy, 1917-1963.

    “Buhari submits 2021-2023 MTEF/FSP to NASS

    · As FG proposes N12.66tn budget

    · Deficit of N5.161tn; loan N4.28tn”

    VANGUARD, July 22, 2020, p 28.

    America’s youngest President ever would be remembered for stacking his advisers with the top brains he could find. Later in a book by that name, David Halberstam called them THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST. The search for the best people to assume important positions remains the first task of any national leader because on them lie the success and failure of his government. Nobody can ever accuse Buhari of selecting the most outstanding people for assignments. All one needs to remember is that the President scrapped the Board of the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, in favour of the Interim Management Committee, IMC, which is now entertaining the world to a grand display of washing dirty underwears in public. The NDDC crowd represents the rest of the mistakes Buhari has made – and from which he will not learn.

    The proposed 2021 budget is even a worse form of self-deception and planned devastation of the Nigerian economy than all the previous ones which the FG had inflicted on the nation in the name of change. If an enemy had wanted to destroy this country, it could not have done worse than the Buhari administration. Unfortunately for us, we are doomed to endure for almost three more years a Federal Government which would have ruined Nigeria beyond redemption by the time it leaves office. All these calamities will befall us because we have leaders who have stopped learning decades ago; people still living in 1985.

    Insanity had been defined repeatedly as “doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result”. The 2021 budget is nothing more than the 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 budgets reproduced with the figures altered, some words changed and increased to create the illusion of progress. Yet, within and outside the FG, there are factors which point to a different outcome next year. Let me provide some examples which are representative of others.

    “FITCH: Nigerian Bank’s Lending to Shrink 25% in 2020.”

    THISDAY, July 1, 2020 p 23.

    Banks as every Level 100 student of Economics knows constitute the engine room of the economy. Banks lend more to an expanding economy and less to a declining one. Obviously, banks’ lending will shrink only because there will be no clients wishing to borrow or fewer profitable projects. Either way, the economy will contract when a significant segment of the private sector of the economy reduces borrowing and bank lending shrink correspondingly in 2020.

    Brighter students will also be aware that a lot of the lending for one year will influence the economy for a few years into the future. So, investments that will be shelved in 2020 will have negative impact on the economy well into 2025. It is doubtful if the FG’s budget managers take such variables into account when preparing budgets. This explains why no single budget had ever turned out well.

    “LCCI, experts worry as debt rises by 127%”. PUNCH, July 24, 2020, p 22.

    First the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Indusry, LCCI, made the observation that “debt profile grew by 127 per cent from N12.6tn in 2015 to N28.6tn as of March 2020.” The year is not ended yet; so the debt might rise above that.

    Second “only recently, the National Assembly approved the revised 2020 budget of N10.8tn. The recurrent component was N4.9tn, which is 45.4 per cent. The capital component was N2.49tn, which is 23 per cent of the budget, the debt service component is N2.95tn, which is 27.3 per cent of the budget…..the debt service is 118 per cent of the capital budget provision.”

    While it is unlikely that 100 per cent of the releases for capital projects will be achieved – given the FG’s track record – the recurrent and debt services expenditures will be met. So, if the borrowing stops now, the percentage of the debt service to capital will certainly go up. This FG, unlike any other one since 1985, is a debt-addict. All addictions represent the outcome of a habit which those seized by it allow to grow over time. Invariably, a government’s resort to debt-financing of its budgets is a product of a leader’s mind-set. A government which for five years failed to raise sufficient revenues to execute its programmes and had to resort increasingly to borrowing has lost control just as the drug addict eventually does as he needs higher doses of the drug each time around.

    Just like the common drug addict, the FG and its incompetent agents in the Debt Management Office, DMO, have lately engaged in poor quality propaganda with advertisements of some roads. Like false advertisers of fake products, the DMO recently had published portions of roads showing BEFORE and AFTER conditions in a shameless bid to convince Nigerians that the proceeds of loan are well spent. It is the sort of deception unbecoming of a government which expects its leaders to be respected for at least two reasons.

    Noticeably, locations of the portions of the roads advertised are not disclosed; neither are we told whether the entire road is as shown under AFTER or only a part of it. A friend told me that only a small portion has been repaired as shown with regard to the Okene-Lokoja road. Second, the impression is given that all the loan goes into roads; when indeed, the lion’s share goes into recurrent expenditure. Governments lose respect when they lie so shamelessly. And, lying and addiction go hand-in-hand. Addicts are naturally deceptive; they hide facts.

    “Poverty has many roots; but the tap root is ignorance.”

    US President Lyndon B Johnson, 1908-1973.

    Johnson replaced, Kennedy when the young President was assassinated in November 1963. His focus as US leader was Health, Education and Welfare. He was passionate not only about the education of the young but of the leaders as well. Johnson made that observation at a workshop for top government officials who were forced to learn new things before advancing proposals for government action. It was Johnson’s belief that the real tap root of poverty is the ignorance of the leaders.

    Understandably, Nigeria became the Poverty Capital of the World in 2018; we have strengthened our grip on that awful title in 2019 and 2020. We are unlikely to relinquish it until Buhari goes in 2023. His lack of capacity to learn new things, as evidenced by the 2021 budget, will stand in the way of any useful change; and he has Ministers as well as Heads of Departments and Agencies who are clones of himself – people stuck in the distant past; incapable of learning.

    Follow us on our social media platform

    Instagram: @delesobowalefranklyspeaking, Twitter:@DrDeleSobowale.

    # FIGHT COVID-19 * WEAR MASKS * KEEP DISTANCE * STAY ALIVE

  • Joints, disjoints and dislocations in the Buhari government, By Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa

    MY primary concern in the running soap opera on the “investigation” of Ibrahim Magu, the erstwhile acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes, EFCC, is public safety. The filming of the drama with the Aso Rock Presidential Villa as main location, had begun with a vehicle suddenly blocking the armed convoy of Magu in the busy streets of Abuja. Both sides were fully armed and a shootout could easily have occurred as they challenged themselves. All the invading force wanted was to deliver a letter to Magu inviting him to appear before a Presidential Panel. So why was the invitation not dropped in Magu’s office or a phone call made inviting him?

     

    The idea was to make a dramatic point that even a member of the Presidential gang can be treated like a common criminal or even worse. The ordinary suspect even when illegally paraded on camera by the police, is still in accordance with the constitution, presumed innocent until proven guilty. In this case, Magu is presumed guilty. He was simply abducted, flung before a panel with no known legal status, and held hostage even when the constitution states that no citizen can be held for more than 48 hours without being charged to court. I imagined if the invading force had an exchange of gunfire with Magu’s unsuspecting convoy, innocent passers-by might have become victims.

     

    A similar scenario had played out on June 11 right in the Presidential Villa when the First Lady, Aisha Buhari led her children, Zahra, Halima and Yusuf, and security details to the house of Mr. Sabiu Yusuf, the President’s nephew and personal assistant to place him in forced isolation. Gun shots were fired in the process leading to the latter fleeing for his life. Neither side admitted to firing the shots and all the Presidency said is that it has ordered an investigation which I am sure, like many others, will not see the light of day. What would have happened if passers-by had been hit by the bullets?

     

    Within minutes of his abduction, Magu’s media trial was in full swing. The secret memo of Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, had been leaked to the press and Magu’s humilation, made public. In the days following, allegations of Magu’s criminality including the looting of recovered funds, accumulation of property through fraudulent means, alleged liaison with a well-known fraudster, were systematically fed to the press.

     

    With a successful media trial spiced with juicy stories and gossips, Magu has been convicted in the court of public opinion; he is like a sacrificial lamb dragged before the altar for slaughter. All the talk about Magu being assured of justice because the Presidential Panel is chaired by the respected Justice Ayo Salami, former President of the Court of Appeal, amounts to nothing because the foundation is faulty. His chances of being declared innocent and restored to his former position is no higher than a cockroach proving its innocence in a gathering of fowls.

     

    In the first place, no serious government would have appointed Magu to such high office given the fact that five years before his appointment, the Police Service Commission had placed him on 20 months forced leave without pay and indicted him for theft of public documents and unprofessionalism, and subsequently handed him a severe reprimand. Secondly, given the seriousness of the 2016 report on Magu by the Department of State Services, DSS, which contains pretty much the allegations being made against him today, the Buhari government had no business retaining him for another four years. Thirdly with the Buhari Government twice presenting Magu for confirmation by the Senate, and the latter rejecting him on both occasions, the administration had no business forcing him on the country. Now, having run the Magu numbers for half a decade, rather than apologise to Nigerians, the Buhari government pretends to have just realised that it is all a racket.

     

     

    Following the Senate refusal to confirm Magu, I distilled three broad positions by the three main institutions involved. For the secret services, Magu is a rotten egg unfit to wear the police uniform or hold any public office. Its message is that Magu is no different from the crooked persons he is being asked to bring to book; that in fixing or changing your locks, you do not hire a graduate from the School of Burglary and Related Studies.

     

    As for the Senate, confirming Magu as the EFCC Chairman is like asking a cat to keep watch over fried fish or a dog to guard a bone. The Presidency made no attempts to publicly defend its nominee, it simply insisted that Magu must remain the EFCC boss. Its body language suggested that it takes a thief to catch a thief; Magu is the best man for the job.

     

    So for five years, the Buhari government that advertises itself as an anti-corruption administration, proudly used the intellectually-challenged Magu as the poster boy of its corruption fight. It appears its anger is that Magu is running a racket of his own within the larger runs entrusted to him.

     

    The move against Magu bears all the trappings of a mafia family getting fed up with a burnt enforcer and showing him who is the boss. Simultaneously, it was sending a message to people outside the group that if a member of the family can be so savagely attacked, worse can be done to outsiders; if chickens can eat the intestines of other chickens what can they not do to the entrails of the cockroach?

     

    Magu was a serial violator of fundamental human rights and many Nigerians think he deserves the treatment being meted out to him. But I do not think we should descend to his level even if a fundamental principle of the Buhari government as enunciated by Malami, its Minister of Justice is that: “The rule of law must be subject to the supremacy of the nation’s security and national interest.” In other words that the fundamental human rights of the Nigerian are subject to the government’s nebulous definition of ‘national security and national interest.’ This is an elegant way of dressing up fascism.

     

    In defending Magu’s fundamental human rights to fair hearing, to bail or prosecution within 48 hours and presumption of innocence unless found guilty by a competent court, we are also defending our fundamental rights. If tomorrow the rights of Malami or Salami are similarly trampled upon, we have a duty as Nigerians to also come to their rescue.

     

    We must not allow the low standards of the Buhari administration to define us as a people. Like all good things, the Buhari administration shall come to pass, but Nigeria will remain.

  • How we can strengthen our democracy – Ehi Braimah

    How we can strengthen our democracy – Ehi Braimah

    By Ehi Braimah

    Since the fourth Republic was inaugurated in 1999 when Chief Olusegun Obasanjo assumed office as civilian President, we have been marching forward in our democratic journey in twists and turns. A child born 21 years ago should be an undergraduate student at a university by now – possibly in his or her third year or even final year. It means the student would soon leave the four walls of the academic environment to take the next big leap of faith in his or her life.

    After the compulsory National Youth Service, our young graduate could decide to become self-employed or pursue other dreams based on his/her plan and vision for the future. Maturity gradually sets in and additional milestones such as becoming married are achieved. When children arrive, the young couple take on the additional responsibility of parenting – that is a different ball game altogether. In life, when we fail to plan, as the popular cliché goes, we have inevitably planned to fail.

    Is our democracy maturing after 21 years or is there a semblance of it? Can we say our democracy has been an experiment in the political laboratory full of trials and errors? If we cast our minds back to the events leading up to the June 12, 1993 presidential election and the subsequent cancellation of the election that was overwhelmingly adjudged as free and fair, you would discover that we lost six years to the reluctance of former military president Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) to relinquish power.

    In a recent interview with media entrepreneur and television presenter, Kadaria Ahmed, IBB tried to explain June 12 scenario that became a watershed moment in our democracy. As I watched the video which went viral, I struggled to make sense out of IBB’s explanation for the annulment of the election 27 years ago. Kadaria pointedly asked IBB what the security concerns he alluded to were regarding late Chief M.K.O. Abiola forming his government after winning the presidential election on June 12, 1993, but there was no clear cut answer; it still remains a puzzle after so many seasons. In the interview which left more questions than answers, IBB also deftly dodged the question on the late General Sani Abacha. He did not explain satisfactorily why he left General Abacha behind after his famous “stepping aside” episode knowing fully well his second in command was very ambitious.

    It was as clear as daylight that IBB did not want the election to hold in the first place. What were we really expecting? It was a military government, mind you, and the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) headed by IBB at the time could do whatever they liked. But for the intervention of the United States government that expressed strong concerns over postponement of the election, June 12 would have been like any other day on the Gregorian calendar.

    Being the maverick that he is, IBB, having been caught on the back foot over the June 12 crisis, cleverly staged an exit strategy in the form of a hurriedly assembled contraption called Interim National Government (ING) headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan, a lawyer, businessman and Egba man from Ogun State. Chief Shonekan’s appointment on August 26, 1993 was actually a Greek gift to the Yorubas in view of the June 12 struggle that cost Chief Abiola, also a Yoruba man from Ogun State, his life.

    At that time, the country was flat broke amid the political turmoil – with a deficit budget of about N28 billion arising mainly from lack of fiscal discipline by the military leadership, inflation had become uncontrollable. After the annulment of the June 12 election, western nations imposed economic sanctions on Nigeria. As Chief Shonekan embarked on meaningful reforms that included lobbying for debt cancellation, releasing political prisoners detained by IBB and auditing the accounts of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), General Abacha struck on November 17, 1993 and removed Chief Shonekan from office in a palace coup.

    After the six-year hiatus that followed, perhaps it is safe to say we have made the most of our democracy since May 29, 1999. Until last year, May 29 was the day set aside as Democracy Day every year to commemorate the successful transition to democratic rule. But isn’t it strange that previous governments deliberately chose to ignore the significance of June 12 in our political calendar until President Muhammadu Buhari last year announced that Democracy Day will no longer be marked on May 29 but on June 12? We must thank President Buhari for his patriotism, wisdom and courage for remembering June 12. In his speech on that day, President Buhari said June 12 – our new Democracy day – will continue to give us the opportunity every year to reflect on our achievements and struggles as a nation

    If there was any major beneficiary of the June 12 debacle, that person is Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, an Egba Chief from Ogun State and retired military general also popularly known as “Baba Iyabo”. Chief Obasanjo became civilian President of Nigeria straight from his incarceration in prison and yet he did not understand the meaning of June 12 whether in its nuanced form or in the context of establishing our democratic credentials. Instead of winning the hearts and minds of Nigerians as a worthy democrat after serving two terms as President, “Baba Iyabo” was more interested in a third term agenda to extend his stay in office for another four years, even though he denied he ever nursed such ambition.

    Where Chief Olusegun Obasanjo failed to recognise June 12 which is a critical threshold in our democratic journey, former President Goodluck Jonathan should have acted differently and seized the moment and moral high ground. Whether we like to acknowledge it or not, Chief Abiola will always be remembered as a martyr of our democracy symbolized by the June 12 struggle. Chief Abiola was a man of many parts and he refused to compromise his electoral mandate freely given by Nigerians on June 12, 1993. He eventually paid the ultimate price for the democracy we are enjoying today.

    Apart from being a hugely successful entrepreneur and amazing philanthropist, Chief Abiola was noted globally as the Pillar of Sports in Africa. According to Kunle Solaja, one of Nigeria’s leading sports journalists in a recent tribute to commemorate June 12 anniversary, “Abiola sponsored various sports activities in Nigeria and 14 other countries including Cote d’Ivoire, Zambia, Senegal and Tunisia. No other African has been able to fill his position as Africa’s First Pillar of Sports since 1980 when the then African Sports Journalists Union (ASJU) bestowed the honour on him. Abiola donated the CAF Cup trophy in 1992 for the confederation and he was the sole sponsor of the African Footballer of the Year Award until his death in 1998, forcing CAF to seek corporate sponsorship.”

    We have a duty, as Nigerians, to ensure Chief Abiola did not die in vain as we mark June 12 every year. We can keep his spirit alive by entrenching the values and practices that would strengthen our democratic culture. Every part of Nigeria was home to Abiola; it means our political leadership should see themselves as Nigerians first. It is trite to say tribal and identity politics are holding us back in the race to build a truly egalitarian society. Our goal should be to promote politics of ideas devoid of bitterness and acrimony; enough of do-or-die politics!

    In addition, we must shun political violence which has cost several lives. Sometimes, the rhetorics politicians exchange are hostile, blood stained and egregious. This attitude explains why politicians are sometimes consumed by their own hubris. From the evil practice of election rigging characterised by ballot box snatching, inducement of voters with cash and food items to manipulation of election results, it is our call to decide whether we want our democracy to grow or regress. Let us support the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to ensure our votes count – it is one man, one vote!

    The flagrant abuse of court processes indicates that we still have a long way to go as we strive to nurture and sustain our democracy. For politicians, it is always a game of survival; their playbook does not feature any higher sense of purpose or ideology. Another challenge in the way we manage our political affairs is the ever present monster called godfatherism. Whatever gains we have made in 21 years of our democracy, godfatherism has continued to be a major setback, accounting for the deficit report in our political balance sheet.

    Unfortunately, political activities including campaigns for elective offices require huge sums of money. A dependable source informed me that it costs about N150m or more to vie for a seat in a State House of Assembly election. Godfathers, my source continued, wield a lot of influence in every political arrangement; politics is a game and you are required to play by the rules otherwise you will become a political orphan. If you do not have your own money, it is always difficult to compete and win. The trade-offs are exacting; more often than not, your pound of flesh – and sometimes blood oaths to prevent betrayals — is needed to return the favour from a political godfather.

    Choice appointments in government and nominations into elective offices are controlled by godfathers. Head or tail, the godfather wins all the time. It is a major albatross. The political situation in the Edo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) had degenerated beyond redemption in view of the long standing face-off between Governor Godwin Obaseki – he has defected to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) — and the suspended National Chairman of the party, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole. At the heart of the matter is the fight for the political soul of the State with consequential damages to the reputation of the State. This development prompted the Oba of Benin, Omo N’Oba N’Edo Uku Akpolokpolo, Oba Ewuare II, to speak on the menace of godfatherism in Edo State politics recently.

    In a press statement from the Oba’s Palace, the Oba of Benin said “godfatherism” and “consensus candidate” must be eradicated from the politics of Edo State because they are “political vices” that are antithetical to the fundamental basis of democracy. Godfatherism is by no means limited to only Edo State; it is a national pastime among influential politicians with deep pockets. In order to sustain a viable democracy, the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, said if politicians lead by example by upholding probity, self-sacrifice and unselfishness, “the people will follow all too readily in our footsteps”.

    To safeguard our democracy, it is important we uphold the rule of law and respect the provisions of our constitution. In any society where there is no law and order, anarchy will become the order of the day. The trigger for mob action and protests is the absence of fairness, transparency, equity and social justice. According to former President Obasanjo, Nigeria has no business with poverty in view of our abundant human and natural resources.

    As we mark 21 years of our democracy, everyone has a role to play in the task of nation building. If we are not available to be used as thugs during elections, our politicians will behave differently. Chief Awolowo reminds politicians on the urgent need for moral and spiritual re-construction that will help demolish the morbid desire for naked power and ensure fair play, equity and social justice for all. Are our politicians ready to heed the advice of the late sage? Only time will tell.

    Braimah is a public relations and marketing strategist based in Lagos

  • Seven private clinic staff test positive for COVID-19 in Ondo, Govt shuts down operations

    Seven private clinic staff test positive for COVID-19 in Ondo, Govt shuts down operations

    The Ondo State Government has shut down operations of a private clinic in Okitipupa after seven staff at the clinic tested positive for COVID-19.

    This is just as the state recorded 30 new cases within one week.

    Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu who announced this at a press briefing on Monday said the number of COVID-19 cases in the state has risen to 73.

    Akeredolu said nine persons have died from COVID-19 related ailment while 880 samples collected for testing from 753 suspected cases across the 18 LGAs.

    He said 33 persons have been discharged after being successfully treated.

    The Ondo Governor listed the distribution spread in the local government areas to include Akure South (35), Odigbo (8), Owo (3), Ose (3), Akure North (2), Ondo West (6), Okitipupa (11), Akoko South West, Akoko South East (1), Ile-Oluji/Okeigbo (1), Ifedore (2).

    Akeredolu stated that the 30 new cases recorded within last week were cases of community transmission.

    Akeredolu said the spread was now in all the four corners of our state and found habitat in all the three senatorial districts.

    His words, “It is shocking that those who came into contact with the earlier confirmed cases are becoming a harvest of COVID – 19 infection. As at today, one of such customers to the infected seller of used fabrics at Oja Oba market in Akure has been traced, tested and found to be positive to COVID–19.

    “Government has obeyed to the letters and carried out the full implementation of the basic national protocols of prevention and control by mobilising the enormous resources available to it.

    “Though a large percentage of our people have shown reckless disregard and neglect to the regulations clearly set out, I wish to assure you still that as a responsible government, we will not be tired.”

    Akeredolu praised residents of Ilara-mokin after they shut down their town and began immediate line tracing of all known contacts to a man who died of COVID-19.

    “They promptly organised a town meeting, locked down market activities, church, mosque and other religious and social activities until further notice. Their objective was to save their own lives and to kick out COVID-19 from their community.

    “It is the right thing to do and we will continue to support them to achieve the very best in this. Unlike many of our city centres, they are not keen to substitute wealth and ignorance for the survival and preservation of their community.”

  • Ebonyi Gov, Dave Umahi confesses: There are moles in my government

    Gov. David Umahi of Ebonyi has openly acknowledged the existence of moles in his government but insisted that his administration had nothing to hide.

    Umahi’s position is contained in a social media comment posted on Sunday.

    He was reacting to a post by a WhatsApp group participant accusing the former Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Bernard Odoh, of “unholy alliance with a particular incumbent governor of a South-Eastern state”.

    Umahi, who reiterated his earlier warning that government appointees should not castigate another governor or other officials, urged his critics to visit the Ebonyi government’s information website for information they needed.

    “Those who want to betray me will end up fighting the wind as there is nothing to betray except, maybe, a display of ingratitude to God.

    “Those who sit on the fence in defending their government will definitely receive the same reward whenever they need defence from government.

    “Anyone who supports him (Odoh) or his betrayal will also get betrayed especially at a time of his or her greatest need,” Umahi said.

    Umahi, while challenging the moles in his government to send his post to whoever they cared, described the said governor as his friend “even before now”.

    “Whenever someone becomes a governor, he is no more the property of anyone else other than God and the people,” he said.

    He enjoined his supporters to leave the said governor or the ruling party at the federal level out of any accusation, insisting that Odo was not in the mentioned state’s government house as alleged by the WhatsApp group participant.

    The Ebonyi government had been having a running battle with the former SSG over the disbursement of the small and medium-scale agricultural fund in 2016.

    State government officials and Odoh’s supporters have resorted to the social media to air their views and, in most cases, cast aspersions on one another over the panel of inquiry set up by the government to investigate the disbursement.

    They have also traded accusations over the petition written by Odo to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), urging the anti-graft body to investigate the disbursements.

  • The Presidency needs a dispute resolution mechanism – Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa.

    THE Buhari Presidency last Friday, May 29, composed songs of praise to mark its fifth year in office. In a child-like manner, its image-makers taunted perceived enemies and insulted Nigerians who do not think the administration should be celebrated.

    I am one of those who see no reason for any celebration in this season of global health crisis, lockdowns, mass job and income losses, economic meltdown with death lurking our hospitals and isolation centres.

    Our case is worsened by massive local and foreign loans for mainly non-tangible things; debts this administration is piling up for future generations to pay, or upon which they will be enslaved.

    I do not want to waste precious time debating corruption in this government. At least not in this lockdown when Nigerians are told billions of naira have been spent on the School Feeding Programme even before the child at home saw a grain of rice.

    I may be more willing to discuss insecurity. At least no honest person can dispute the fact that five years ago, our main security challenge was the Boko Haram insurgency. Today, there is added banditry which has swept through states like Katsina, Zamfara, Sokoto, Kebbi, Kaduna and Niger states. It is not surprising that there are people in the Presidency who think Nigerians should celebrate; in every adversity, there will be those smiling to the banks, singing victory songs and thanking God. This to me, is a sense of morbid governance.

    I do not think we need a national debate when a hunter says the domestic cat he has on the tether is the lion that has been tormenting the community; he sees a lion, we see a domestic feline. The songs from the Presidency could only have been composed by those who eat at the table, or among those the crumbs are shared. A more discerning Presidency would have realised that a hungry person cannot be receptive to any other message but food. Millions of hungry Nigerians cannot be receptive to the long windy tales of President Buhari’s claimed successes or the delusion of how lucky we are to have him as President.

    One concern I have is that after five years in power, the Buhari administration does not seem capable of putting in place a simple conflict resolution mechanism in the Presidency; something a first-year student of Industrial Relations should be able to accomplish. The result is the frequent blowouts in the Presidency with serious negative effects on governance. I recall that prior to the September 23, 1987 creation of Akwa Ibom State, there were ethnic tensions in the Old Cross River State. In analysing this, a Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calabar was quoted as saying that: “Cross River State is an atomistic society perpetually at war with itself.” That analysis may well be true of the Buhari Presidency.

    The newest blowout is that between the Minister of Communication and Digital Economy, Dr. Ibrahim Isa Pantami and the Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, NIDCOM, Mrs. Abike Oluwatoyin Dabiri-Erewa. She was former Chair of the House Committee on Diaspora Affairs and later, Senior Special Assistant to President Buhari on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora. It appears that the lacklustre performance of the Foreign Affairs Minister with Nigerians being killed, attacked or arbitrarily sentenced in countries like South Africa, Malaysia and Ghana, necessitated the birth of NIDCOM in 2018.

    Given the fact that the Commission was created from the ribs of the Foreign Affairs Ministry, no space could be made for it in the Ministry’s sprawling complex. So NIDCOM was like a homeless orphan which roamed the streets for six months before the Nigeria Communications Commission, NCC, under the Communications Ministry, gave it an office space on May 29, 2019.

    NIDCOM saw its new offices as home and proceeded to make itself comfortable. It installed a dedicated International Telecommunication Call centre. It even started building a studio for an online Diaspora radio station. However, NIDCOM is back on the streets. The Commission chairman claimed that on Sunday February 9, 2020 while on President Buhari’s entourage to Ethiopia, she received a phone call from the NCC boss, Professor Umar Garba Dambatta, giving the Commission one week to vacate its offices. Two days later, armed men seized the Commission’s office, including its equipment and files, and refused its staff entry.

    Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa on February 13, sent an SOS message to President Buhari. However, unbelievably, and despite video evidence, the NCC on May 20, claimed Erewa was lying and that in fact: “… the Commission had not started using any of these spaces as office.” Pantami followed up with an attack on her: “This is a fat lie from her. The owner of the building NgComCommission has faulted her lies on their social media platforms.” An obviously irritated Dabiri-Erewa retorted: “An Islamic scholar should not lie. Hon minister (Phd)…But please release all our office equipment. Public office is transient?” In all these, as in similar cases, the Presidency has maintained an undignified silence.

    The same silence it maintained in the 2019-2020 open disagreements between the National Security Adviser, Babagana Monguno and the late Chief of Staff, Abba Kyari. In what amounted to accusations of treason, Monguno accused Kyari of overriding the President’s directives and issuing personal directives to the security services. It was also silent on Monguno’s accusations against the security chiefs that they allegedly took unconstitutional orders from Kyari.

    The Presidency was quiet when three years ago, First Lady Aisha Buhari claimed an unelected cabal rather than President Buhari was running the country. It also was silent in the physical fight within the Presidential Palace between the First Lady and Fatima, a daughter of power broker, Mamman Daura. The Presidency was equally silent on the open confrontation between the First Lady and Presidential spokesman, Garba Shehu whom she accused of shifting: “…his loyalty from the President to others who have no stake in the compact that the President signed with Nigerians on May 29, 2015, and 2019.”

    More dangerously, it was silent in the open confrontations between the Nigeria Intelligence Agency, NIA, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC; and between the latter and the Department of State Services, DSS, which culminated in the three armed agencies three years ago confronting themselves in an Abuja street. The EFCC-DSS battles might be the primary reason why the Presidency has in the last five years, been unable to get the acting EFCC Chairman, Ibrahim Magu confirmed, as the DSS claims Magu is unfit to hold public office. A simple dispute resolution mechanism in the Presidency might have resolved most of these matters and properly focused the Buhari administration on simple governance.


     

  • Covid-19: Hard choices – Francis Ewherido

    By Francis Ewherido

    The Corona Virus (COVID-19) is one visitor that is not in a hurry to depart. It has taken up residence on mother earth at least for now. The lockdown that was imposed when the virus hit our shores is being gradually lifted. Another lockdown is unlikely and not even sensible because it will not bring an end to COVID-19; only a cure would. So we have to learn to live with it.

    Learning to live with COVID-19 leaves us with some tough choices. The brief period we were on lockdown has opened the eyes of many people to how quickly cash reserves can be depleted if you are not adding to it. So, many of us must go out there to earn a living. That increases our exposure to the virus. We need to observe all safety precautions: using of face masks, regular washing of hands, sanitising of hands and social distancing, among others. But there is still no absolute guarantee that those who take these precautions will not be infected. The precautions only reduce the probability of getting infected. Also, it has become very obvious that we are a very social and communal people, so social distancing is among the least observed precautions. This poses a clear and present danger.

    COVID-19 has changed the way people live and earn a living. Very soon, people who do not adapt are going to ask , “Who Moved My Cheese.” I tried to set up a meeting with a potential client. The way he reacted on the other side of the phone, you would think he was jumping to avoid a snake bite. People who did not like virtual meetings have to adjust.

    It is the way of the future for now. Some of these virtual meeting platforms are comparatively new, but they are not as technical as people assume. The problem is more of adaptation. As John Maynard Keyne rightly observed, “the difficulty lies not in new ideas, but escaping the old ones, which penetrate every corner of our minds.”

    But embracing new ideas we must. There is a book, one of my brothers gave to me about five years. It is one of many books I had not gotten around to read. But I added it among the books to read during the lockdown. It is called Strategic Learning and the author is Willie Pietersen, a South African-born Professor at Columbia University in America. Though it was published 10 years ago, it is actually tailored for a VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) environment like the COVID-19’s. The book seeks to clarify VUCA environments and how businesses should respond to it. But the contents can be applied to all facets of life. After all, business is about people (customers, employees, shareholders, government regulators, etc).

    The book deals with building adaptive organisations (you can substitute people for organisation). It talks about the “ingrained ability to make sense of the changing environment, and rapidly translate insights into action. This involves learning, strategy creation, focus, alignment and execution
    It explains leadership, for which there are trailer-loads of literature, in a few sentences: intrapersonal leadership (leadership of self), strategic leadership (leadership of an organisation) and interpersonal leadership (leadership of others). All these congregate to integrated leadership, which is what leadership (family, business, club, church, etc.) is all about. Defect in one affects the sum total.

    Today, we are confronted with information from many sources competing for our limited time and attention, but Pietersen rightly declares that, “no longer does the world belong to the ones with the most information, but to those with the highest ability to make sense of it; no longer to those who know more, but to those who understand better.” For me, no statement has put it more succinctly than Pietersen’s that we have left information age for the conceptual age. Information is good, making sense of the information is better.

    Before I leave, Pietersen, I want to deal with strategy, a word which we use all the time and apply willy-nilly. No matter how much resources we have, it remains scarce in relative to our needs and wants, and we are in a competitive world! So in applying our limited resources, we have to make choices to ensure we trump competition. These choices ought not to be haphazard, but be measured; that is what strategy is about. We are talking business here, but it is the same scenario, we face in other aspects of our lives. At times like this with increasing competition and limited resources, our choices need to be measured.

    Right now, the body language of the government tends towards reopening the economy and normalising the situation. Soon travel ban will be lifted. Are you going to sit in one place for fear of COVID-19, or you will take necessary precautions and go about your business and your life? Schools will also be opened at some point. Children are children and not adults. It is difficult to expect the highest standard of precaution that COVID-19 demands from children. So are you going to continue keeping your children at home until COVID-19 is gone or you will gamble by letting them resume school? Whatever choice you make has implications: if they go to school, they risk being exposed to and getting infected with Corona Virus. If you keep them at home, for how long? The virus might be around for two years, as some experts are predicting. A child kept way from school for too long can develop complications in character and learning.

    I believe children should go back when the authorities consider it safe enough, but armed with all the safety precautions, both physical and mental. The safety measures must become a habit. After prayers in my house every day, we usually exchange peace and love of Christ in form of a handshake. Immediately after, my children will head for the sanitizer. I usually scream that “who in this house has Corona Virus that’s going to infect you?” No more shouting, I will even encourage them now so that sanitising will be ingrained before schools resume.

    Keeping safe (face masks, sanitisers, soap, etc.) is expensive. Some people will not be able to provide the safety items for their children when schools resume. So what happens? The government should provide students in public schools with these items, while the private schools should come to some kind of agreement with parents of their pupils.
    For me, life has fully resumed. Life must go on. Adaptation is what we need. Take all necessary precautions and this includes boosting your immune system. In those days, when tax collectors came to villages to collect taxes, the men ran into the bush. So my people came up with a proverb that “osho r’osaruyovwi sa djevw’omoshare vwie-e” (the fear of paying taxes cannot scare me from having male children” – these male children would grow up to be confronted with taxes) The same way the fear of COVID-19 cannot stop us from living our lives. For those of us who believe in God, may God look upon our imperfect efforts, perfect them and crown them with success. Amen.

  • MURIC demands palliatives for pastors, Imams to end agitation for reopening of worship centers

    The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has asked state governments to consider giving palliatives to imams and pastors to cushion the effect of COVID-19 measures on them.

    In a statement issued on Wednesday, Ishaq Akintola, MURIC director, said the palliatives will address the agitation to reopen churches and mosques.

    “The open demand by certain religious leaders for their places of worship to be reopened lends credence to the pressure clerics are going through,” he said.

    “Even the recent decision by some state governments to reopen religious centres is not unconnected with subterranean agitations from clerics in the states. Deserted for weeks, the house of God longs for warmth.

    “The impact of the economic nosedive on imams and pastors cannot be overemphasized particularly for a country whose proletariat is overworked, underpaid and overtaxed.”

    Akintola said the realities of the Nigerian economy call for government’s attention ”particularly as they affect keepers of the house of God”.

    “MURIC therefore advises the various state governments to speedily devise means of getting special palliatives to the clerics in the churches and mosques.

    “They deserve attention at this crucial moment because they have nowhere to go. They should not be turned to beggars. They have served the government at various times. They should not be abandoned in their hour of need.

    “Besides, members of their families deserve decent lives as Section 33 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria stipulates the right to life for every citizen while Section 34 confers the right to the dignity of the human person.”