Tag: Grazing routes

  • Pig farmers also want grazing routes created – Dele Sobowale

    Pig farmers also want grazing routes created – Dele Sobowale

    Dele Sobowale

    “I know of no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution.” Ulysses S Grant, 1822-1885, 18th US President.

    VANGUARD BOOK OF QUOTATIONS, VBQ p 122.
    Grant was an American Civil War General who defeated the Confederate army before being elected. His victory was made possible by thousands of black soldiers who proved more courageous in battle than their white counter-parts. He was full of gratitude for the black people. He appointed quite a few to high office after he was elected President of the re-United States of America.

    But, he did more than that. As President, he inherited a lot of discriminatory laws passed by white people against black Americans. But, most of the laws were so badly drafted they could be used to prosecute anyone. To get them repealed, Grant proceeded to enforce them to the letter by having whites prosecuted for breaking them. Very soon, most of the bad laws were repealed. I learnt this lesson in 1967 while writing a term paper on Radical American Presidents in my third year in the university in America. And Grant entered my collection of quotations.

    Unlike most Southerners and people in some states of the North, I have no objection to the plan hatched by President Buhari and the Attorney General of the Federation, AGF, Mr Abubakar Malami, to createnational grazing routes for herdsmen and their flock. I welcome it whole-heartedly. It is my strong belief that most of those opposed to this laudable scheme – including Southern Governors and Governor Ortom of Benue state — are talking out of ignorance.

    It is understandable why Southern states governors have not had the time to study this scheme dispassionately. Pensioners being owed several years gratuities, current staff demanding for salaries and arrears of entitlements, rising insecurity and ruinous floods everywhere constitute a handful of problems with which all Nigerian governors have to deal.

    Most are not even aware that the recurrent floods evidence permanent global climate change. Consequently, the damages suffered this year will most probably be repeated next year; and the year after; ad infinitum – unless we develop national, states and local government approaches for dealing with the problem.

    Money is becoming a great obstacle to governance everywhere. The noise about the Value Added Tax, VAT, is not about the principle of true federalism. It is a matter of survival of the fittest. Most states are on the verge of collapse; those which hope to benefit from direct VAT collection, without saying so openly, don’t give a damn if the others crumble. It is a “beggar your neighbour” policy. That too is understandable. In late 2015, after the Buhari government launched what Vice President Osinbajo described as the biggest budget increase in history, he also added that the three tiers of government will need to share at least N720 billion per month to survive. For August 2021, all the governments had only N692 billion to share.

    Meanwhile, prices of goods and services have risen by over 100 per cent in the six years in between. States are broke.

    Consequently, I didn’t expect Governors to have time to think outside the box and discover the advantages in open grazing and the creation of grazing routes as proposed by Buhari. We, at the UniJankara, have taken a dispassionate look at the proposal. We have undertaken a Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats, SWOT, analysis. And, we have come to the conclusion that Buhari and Malami are mostly right.

    There should be grazing routes and open grazing nationwide; subject to one amendment. The grazing routes should be open to all flock of animals – cows, rams, goats, camels, monkeys, donkeys and pigs. They should all have equal rights to invade farms, university campuses, schools, highways churches and mosques. Occasionally, they can block the entrance to a Local Government headquarters or state secretariat. The police should turn blind eyes, as they now do, when the destruction of properties take place.
    But, my focus is on pigs. The pig herdsmen should also enjoy the impunity of carrying AK-47 assault rifles; and if possible, bazookas. They should be able to roam all over Nigeria – including Daura, Katsina State – unimpeded. Believe me, Nigeria will in less than ten years, have the largest pig herd in the world. We will reverse the trend towards increasing malnutrition; the cost of food items will gradually come down. In time, we might even feed better than the Americans – in Nigeria. Southern Governors and Mr Ortom, whose people love pigs, should re-consider their opposition to grazing routes. I have been promised about one thousand pigs by the operator of a hog farm in the US – if the idea is accepted. There is no reason why Buhari and Malami should object. After all, what is good for cattle; should also be good for pigs.
    Osinbajo is APC’s second option; PDP has none – 2
    “A living dog is better than a dead lion.” Chinese proverb, VBQ p 42.

    The first part of this series ended with speculations about Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s health and how it will influence Osinbajo’s chances of emerging as APC Presidential candidate for 2023. It needs to be repeated that, as far as I am concerned Tinubu is in good condition and only needs “his batteries recharged” for the great contest ahead. He has no intention of collapsing on the podium like late Umaru Yar’Adua only to receive a ridiculous call broadcast worldwide. “Umaru, are you dead?” Tinubu will tell us if he is incapable of running for office and performing well – if elected.

    However, in order to keep all viable options open, we must be prepared for the possibility. Tinubu should also remember the words of US President Woodrow Wilson, 1856-1924, who as far back as the first World War, WWI, had advised nations to select their leaders from among physically fit individuals. After pointing to the enormous pressure of work, he concluded that “it is unlikely that those who are not fit can survive”.
    Five Nigerian leaders have died in office – Tafawa Balewa, Aguyi Ironsi, Murtala Mohammed, Sani Abacha and Yar’Adua. The first three were assassinated; the last two on account of terminal illness hidden from Nigerians. Buhari after his first medical trip abroad, returned and announced that “I have never been so sick in my life”. There are a few lessons for all of us in that statement and what followed. Buhari has since the first medical trip made several to London at great expense to Nigeria. The trips have exposed him as a hypocrite – given his criticism of his predecessors. Nigeria does not need another basket case as President.

    “A week is a long time in politics”. Harold Wilson, British Prime Minister.
    So, although Asiwaju is still a private citizen, unlike Abacha and Yar’Adua, and he is under no obligations to disclose to Nigerians his health status, patriotism and a deep sense of patriotism would dictate that he should be very honest with himself first. The modern President is on duty 24/7, 365 days in the year. Sometimes, two or three major crises might be calling for attention. He must have the stamina to cope with all these. In the 1970s, a week was a long time in politics. In the Age of Internet, an hour increasingly appears like eternity. Nations need leaders who are as fit as Olympic athletes. Money is important; political machines are vital. But, if the leader does not intend to be carried out, feet first, of the Presidency, he must be extremely healthy. Asiwaju should also be honest with Nigerians.

    And, if there is any doubt about his fitness to carry the awful load of office, it will be mightily honourable of him if he supports Osinbajo.

    Unfortunately, that will not assure the VP of ultimate victory. There is still an elephant in the room standing in the way of final success.
    To be continued…

  • Tracing grazing routes through the Presidential Villa – Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa

    Alhaji Tanimu Yakubu was Special Adviser on Economic Matters to President Umaru Musa Yar’adua. Before becoming one of Nigeria’s best Presidents in our leadership-challenged country, Yar’Adua was Governor of Katsina State and TY, as Yakubu is fondly called, was one of his cabinet members for three years from 1999.

    When TY was preparing that administration’s first budget in Katsina State, he studied the past trends in the government support for agriculture. He discovered that annually, 80 per-cent of the agriculture budget was allocated for fertilizer procurement.

    Given the fact that there are a number of clearly identified necessities of agriculture, he decided to research why fertilizer alone was consuming four fifths of the agriculture budget.

    He appointed consultants to carry out a survey amongst farmers in the state to generate a list of their actual needs; they were 20 items. Then, a second stage of the survey was carried out for the farmers to rank those needs from the most to the least important. The result was shocking. The farmers listed fertilizer as the 13th in their list of their needs! Desertification was ranked number one, extension service, two and market/profitability, three. The farmers did not even identify subsidy as a requisite.

    TY did a personal follow up on the farmers and researchers on why desertification was the primary challenge to agriculture. They affirmed that the major cause of falling farm yield is desertification as it destroys the topsoil.

    The findings made TY study in-depth, the desertification phenomenon. He made public, the result of his findings: “A recurring conclusion drawn from evidences gathered in the field was that OPEN GRAZING was a key factor responsible for destroying 90 per-cent of the vegetation cover in Northern Nigeria from 1960 to 2000.

    If we can help it, this destructive trend that’s making our environment increasingly hostile to all fauna and flora must be arrested and reversed. It must also not be imported to Southern Nigeria.”

    TY has support in the current Katsina State Governor Bello Masari, who has reached the same conclusion but based less on the science and more on the morality of it. He thinks it is ungodly for a person to have cows he cannot feed and allow them eat up the crops of other people: “The herders’ movement is essentially in search of two things: water and fodder.

    If we can provide these two items, why should they move? The roaming about for us is un-Islamic and it is not the best. It is part of the problems we are having today. I don’t support that we should continue with open grazing.”

    Masari, as chief security officer of bandit-challenged Katsina State, said most of the bandits are herdsmen: “They are the same people like me, who speak the same language like me, who profess the same religious beliefs like me. So, what we have here on ground are bandits; they are not aliens, they are people we know, they are people that have been living with us for 100 of years.”

    But the National Secretary of Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Saleh Alhassan, asked Nigerians to ignore the governor: “Did you take that drunkard serious? My governor, do you take him serious? Can’t you see that he is already tired? Records should come from security operatives, not a confused human being…Forget that man, that man is the worst Governor Katsina has had; we are just praying for his time to lapse.”

    However, Masari’s position on open grazing is backed by almost all the governors in the country. The Northern States Governors’ Forum, NSGF, on February 9, 2021, declared: “The current system of herding mainly through open grazing is no longer sustainable, in view of growing urbanisation and population of the country.” The Southern States Governors’ Forum has taken a step further by deciding to legislate against it.

    However, there are those stoutly opposed. For instance, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, submits that banning open grazing “does not align with the provisions of the Constitution; hence it does not hold water. It is about constitutionality within the context of the freedoms expressed in our Constitution. Can you deny the rights of a Nigerian?”

    He argued that banning herders and their cows from roaming around villages, towns and cities is limiting the freedom and liberty of movement: “It is a dangerous provision for any governor in Nigeria to think he can bring any compromise on the freedom and liberty of individuals to move around.”

    Malami has strong support in Bauchi State Governor, Bala Mohammed, who believes that: “The Fulani man is a global or African person” who has the right to traverse the continent irrespective of borders. He opposes any ban or restriction on open grazing because as far as he is concerned, the country is a no-man’s land: “Nobody owns any forests in Nigeria, it’s owned by Nigeria.”

    Mohammed has a strong supporter in one of his predecessors, Isa Yuguda, an economist, business administrator and banker who was Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of two banks in the country. He was also Aviation Minister for two years from 2003.

    Yuguda argues that: “The Nigerian State has not been fair to these people (herders). When the Whiteman came they provided cattle grazing and routes from Maiduguri to Lokoja and Ilorin. These infrastructures were provided by the White people, and today where are the grazing reserves and the cattle routes?”

    Yuguda, as an accomplished banker ordinarily, should understand that cattle rearing is a business. Secondly, as Bauchi State Governor, he did not show his people the grazing routes he claimed the Whiteman created. As Minister of Aviation he did not differentiate the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, or any airport in the country for that matter, from the grazing routes he claims were created.

    Since Abuja has a master plan, I have tried to find out the grazing routes Yuguda and his fellow travellers talk about, and nobody in government is willing to reveal such a heavily guarded secret. I am wondering whether it has to do with claims that the Aso Rock Presidential Villa was not in the original Abuja Master Plan.

    What if the Villa is built on a grazing route? Shouldn’t we destroy it to allow cows the freedom of movement? This will be quite interesting because the Supreme Court and the Federal Secretariat are also along the Villa route. We can simply destroy them, secure foreign loans and rebuild them.

    But the issue of open grazing has become like an open sore and has claimed lots of lives apart from creating avoidable tension, not because the issues are not clear cut; the fact is that there are people who hope to benefit from the politics.

  • Kebbi gov backs Buhari, explains how identification of grazing routes can help end farmer/herder crisis

    Kebbi gov backs Buhari, explains how identification of grazing routes can help end farmer/herder crisis

    Kebbi State Governor Atiku Bagudu on Thursday argued that mapping out grazing routes will help to identify the scale of the herder-farmer crisis.

    President Muhammadu Buhari recently ordered a committee to review 368 grazing sites across 25 states in the country to determine the levels of encroachment.

    Critics have faulted the President’s directive, noting that ranching is a more viable alternative to open grazing.

    But, speaking on a monitored Channels Television programme on Thursday, Bagudu said the President’s directive does not preclude the idea of ranching.

    “The committee is to identify grazing routes and work with states and map them. It is not to recover grazing routes, it is to identify the scale of the problem,” Bagudu said.

    “Mr President is interested in an audit of grazing reserves. It is a voluntary and collaborative thing with the states.

    “People say we have spoken about ranching. Yes, but what is a ranch? Ranching does not take place in the air, it takes place on a piece of land.

    “Ranches are as big as grazing reserves. In some countries like Australia, some ranches are bigger than some Nigerian states.

    “So how do you know what’s available, what can be supported to host those roving, herding communities who need help to modernise?”

    When asked why the President appeared to have taken a special interest in helping herders modernise since it is a private business, Bagudu said the issue is a “shared public interest.”

    “We have interest historically to make our farmers do better,” he said. “That’s why we have all kinds of programs and extension services, so our farmers can do better. And it is a desirable public goal.

    “So, historically, we have invested more in the farming sector, to the disadvantage of both fishing and animal husbandry.

    “We want to help them (herders) modernise so Nigeria can benefit and generate more value from this important sector.

    “If we can support those in the banking sector with five trillion to save the banks from collapsing, I don’t think we are doing any disservice to support our farmers, support millions in the animal husbandry sector and support our fishing communities as well.”

  • You can’t be talking about looking for grazing routes in 2021, Falana slams Buhari

    You can’t be talking about looking for grazing routes in 2021, Falana slams Buhari

    Popular human Rights Activist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana has faulted President Muhammadu Buhari’s approval to review grazing reserves in 25 states in the country.

    “We’ve gone beyond this stage of looking for grazing routes”.

    “As far as the law is concerned, the President cannot, (with profound respect), be talking of looking for grazing routes in 2021, Nigeria.

    “The Northern Governor Forum, the Southern Governors Forum, and even the Miyetti Allah group have all come to a conclusion that open grazing is obsolete,” Falana said on a monitored Channels Television programme on Sunday.

    His comments come days after President Buhari approved recommendations of a committee to review “with dispatch,” 368 grazing sites, across 25 states in the country, “to determine the levels of encroachment.”

    Among other things, the Committee recommended the production of maps and geo-mapping/tagging of sites, analysis of findings and report preparations as well as design appropriate communication on Grazing Reserves and operations.

    This comes as the nation battles insecurity, including farmer-herder clashes.

    But efforts by the Federal Government to resolve the age-long crises including the introduction of the Rural Grazing Area (RUGA) have met stiff opposition.

    Many believe ranching is a better approach to the problem.

    “We need a national resolution of this crisis. We need a scientific solution. We need a modern solution to this problem,” Falana said.

    “State governors are already investing in ranching”.