Tag: Hate Speech

  • UN human rights Chief defends online hate speech regulation

    UN human rights Chief defends online hate speech regulation

    UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has argued that regulating harmful online content is not censorship. He emphasised that hate speech and divisive social media posts have “real-world consequences.”

    He also stated that there is a responsibility to regulate such content to protect individuals and society from the harm it can cause.

    Türk made this statement on Friday following Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to end the company’s fact-checking programme in the United States.

    “Allowing hate speech and harmful content online has real-world consequences. Regulating this content is not censorship,” Türk wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

    In a longer post on LinkedIn, Türk argued that calling efforts to create safe online spaces “censorship” ignores the reality that an unregulated space often silences marginalised voices.

    He also noted that allowing hatred online restricts free expression and could lead to harm.

    Zuckerberg announced the cessation of Meta’s fact-checking programme last Tuesday, citing concerns over political bias and claiming that self-regulation led to excessive censorship.

    He called for freer speech on Meta platforms and criticised the erosion of user trust.

    The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) rejected Zuckerberg’s argument, calling it “false” and warning that it could have harmful consequences.

    Türk highlighted that social media platforms possessed the potential to positively shape society by fostering connections.

    “However, they also have the ability to incite conflict, spread hatred, and endanger individuals’ safety.

    “At its best, social media is a place where people with divergent views can exchange, if not always agree,” he said.

    The UN Human Rights Chief reiterated his commitment to promoting accountability and governance in the digital space, ensuring public discourse remained healthy, trustworthy, and respectful of human rights.

    When asked about Meta’s recent decisions and their impact on the UN’s social media policy, a UN spokesperson in Geneva, Michele Zaccheo, emphasised that the global organisation continued to monitor and evaluate the online space.

    He added that the UN remained dedicated to providing evidence-based information across social media platforms.

    Similarly, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reaffirmed its commitment to providing quality, science-based health information and maintaining a presence on various online platforms.

    In response to the growing threat of digital misinformation, the UN Department of Global Communications (DCG) has been actively working to combat false narratives, including through the development of the UN Global Principles for Information Integrity.

  • 2023 Election: INEC warns against bullying, hate speeches

    2023 Election: INEC warns against bullying, hate speeches

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Tuesday warned Politicians and their supporters against bullying, Cyber sleuth and hate speeches during electioneering campaigns.

    Dr Hale Longpet, Kogi Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) gave the warning during the Commission’s engagement with representatives of political parties, traditional rulers, religious and community leaders in Lokoja, Kogi.

    Newsmen reports that the forum was one of series of stakeholders’ engagements and consultations preparatory organised by the commission towards the conduct of the 2023 general elections in Nigeria.

    The commission engaged stakeholders on wide range of issues including Electioneering campaigns, Schedules of PVC distribution, security, election officials’ conduct before and during elections in the state.

    Longpet said that the warning became necessary because INEC was committed to delivering a free, successful and credible elections in 2023.

    “Already, we are prosecuting an election offender arising from use of fowl language and hate speech
    having committing an election offence contrary and punishable under sections 91 to 97 of the new electoral law.

    “As a commission, we will not condone thuggery, use of abusive language and cyber bullying of political opponents during electioneering campaigns for the forthcoming 2023 general elections in Kogi.

    “This commission has been consistent in mapping out measures and procedures that will make the entire electoral process seamless for the voters, ” he said

    The REC said that INEC embarked on an exercise tagged “expansion of vote access to polling units” aimed at ensuring that the Voter has a pleasant experience during the PVC collection and election day.

    He said that the commission has made PVCs distribution so easy by taking them to the Ward level for people to conveniently pick their voters cards without cost of transportation and other logistical problems.

    Longpet pledged to address the issues of terrains in-difficult-to-reach communities in the borderlines in Ibaji local government area, armed conflict in Bassa LGA, alleged misconduct and compromise of INEC electoral officers in the local government areas and inadequate logistics/ bottlenecks.

    Responding, the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), expressed satisfaction with the measures taken by INEC towards achieving electoral sanity in the electoral process toward the 2023 polls.

    Also, traditional rulers, religious and community leaders, pledged to convey INEC’S message of peace to the voters in their domains and expressed their shared resolve to end the culture of violence associated with previous elections geared towards peaceful elections in Kogi.

    12 political parties under the banner of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), traditional rulers, religious and community leaders as well as Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) attended the interactive session

    The political parties in attendance include Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), NRM, Accord Party, APGA, APN; PRP; APC; APP; SDP; Action Alliance (AA) and Africa Action Congress (AAC) amongst others.

  • A minister’s difficult journey to the National Assembly – By Okoh Aihe

    A minister’s difficult journey to the National Assembly – By Okoh Aihe

    It can be exasperatingly helpless when somebody tries to make a point and nobody seems to understand. So it was the other day as the Information and Culture Minister, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, made a passionate appeal to the lawmakers at the National Assembly to, at least, add more funds to his 2023 budget to enable his ministry perform its responsibilities in the remaining but challenging days of this administration. He was stone-walled by a group of people who seemed to have woken up on the wrong side that very day or probably waited long for the opportunity to deal him a telling blow.

    The reputation of the minister precedes him. You hate him before you see him. People jump to a conclusion before they even hear him. And working for a government whose success is harboured only in the imagination of those who work for it, his job, which he has pursued with unwavering loyalty and doggedness, is particularly difficult, thus earning him some unsavoury sobriquet and a natural attraction to loathsomeness. But he is never one to turn his back in a battle. So, he is resolute in every sense of his job at the Information ministry.

    Lai Mohammed had a case, and a very good one, in my opinion. He had gone before the House Committee on Information to defend the 2023 Budget of his Ministry. With him were his lieutenants from the parastatals under him, which include: Voice of Nigeria (VON), News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), Nigeria Television Authority (NTA) and Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON). It was his final budget defence, he wanted to leave on high personally and leave the ministry in some financial comfort and buoyancy.

    What he got was a shocker. While the ministry enjoyed an approval of N2.5bn in 2022 as capital budget, with N1bn of that sum going to the ministry; for 2023, the House has only approved N869m capital budget for the entire ministry with the ministry itself getting a miserly N346m, making Mohammed to cry out that his ministry “has been dealt a very heavy card in this year’s budgetary allocation.”

    Just looking at the parastatals alone tells you that Mohammed has a very important job to do for the government. Apart from ARCON, the other ones like VON, NTA and NAN are major vehicles of mass mobilisation and information dissemination. Without speaking for the minister, media is not cheap; making it work and getting the right personnel is even more challenging.

    But his concerns are much more than that. Fighting hate speech, fake news and disinformation, which have been his major obsession, serious push back at the international community to educate them on the goings-on in Nigeria, instead of the kind of advisory issued recently on security by some countries, awareness campaign on the coming elections, the national census that may happen in the lifetime of this administration, and above all, just to get the right funds to properly inform Nigerians of the great work that the Buhari administration has done in nearly eight years. One thing you can say about Mohammed is that he doesn’t fit the description of some of the people the President himself accused recently of not speaking well enough of the achievements of his administration. He tries his best and he wants to continue to do so but he needs funds.

    “I fully understand the current challenges the country is facing, but I don’t agree that the ministry of information and culture at this critical time should have less, it actually should have more,” he appealed.

    The minister is only getting a small taste of what happens to the media each time there is a little dip in the economy. The media is the first to be affected. Everybody loves the media. They want to be seen, they want to be heard, and they want lofty stories written about them, sometimes, just celebrating their inanities. But they cut the budget, take advertising from the media or, in some other orchestrations, make it impossible for the media to operate.

    Apart from some kind of excuses the lawmakers pleaded, I want to observe here that the minister was unfairly treated. He got a raw deal. Some obviously have premeditated reasons for not listening to the length of his appeal. Apart from the Committee Chairman, Hon. Olusegun Odebunmi, who counselled the minister to return to the executive to launch his appeal, a member of the Committee, Hon. Ahmed Jaha, simply told the minister it was hard for them to do anything as the National Assembly members had been serially accused of padding budgets.

    “It’s the same federal government that will come through the ministry of information and accuse the National Assembly of padding the budget. So, minister, I want you to understand that we are being placed between the devil and the deep blue sea,” the lawmaker said without mincing words.

    It was payback time, and that smacks of some cheapness. In the description of the 6th Edition of the Nigerian Broadcasting Code, both NTA and VON are public broadcasters which should be funded by the government or the public, as they shouldn’t generate money through advertising. But the Nigeria situation is amorphous as the public broadcaster, like the NTA, collects lots of money from advertising, but accounting for such revenue has always been a matter of concern. It then becomes difficult to make a case for government support but it does not absolve government of its responsibilities to the stations.

    Irony has no respect for anybody, not even the occupant of the big office of the minister who has only been made to experience what it means to have power and yet be castrated into helplessness. Which is what he has done to broadcast operators since he assumed office. Under his watch, private broadcasters have been made to feel pain as they are often threatened or sanctioned without following due process. It is not that the broadcast regulator, the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) would not know what to do, it is often pressured to expedite the speed of punishment and impose sanctions.

    It may not be superfluous to also point out to the minister that some of the parastatals under him, like the VON, NTA and NAN, have not been properly run, and that could irritate some people, including the lawmaker who accused the platforms of being used by the government against the legislative arm. They are public channels but their public seems to be approximated only by the government. Opposition parties or even dissenting voices have no place in their programming arrangement. Good professionals who should be allowed to thrive in their trade are micromanaged by the ministry and thrust on the borderline of mediocrity, to their shame and impotence. Were the government outfits allowed to run more professionally, perhaps it would have more support from the advert market, no matter how incongruous the idea is, and enjoy more hefty votes from the National Assembly.

    And this leaves me with a plea. Is it possible for the minister to spruce up the operations of the agencies under his ministry – NTA, VON and NAN, among others before the end of this administration, early next year? At least make them run like media outfits and not some kind of rag-tag ministerial appendages. It will be a befitting parting gift. But is such a good thing capable of coming from this administration with tendentious fidelity to the illusory reality of life in our nation, and obtuse entitlement to non-existent achievements? I wait to be proved wrong.

  • ‘Hate speech is never ok or excusable’ – Kim Kardashian

    ‘Hate speech is never ok or excusable’ – Kim Kardashian

    42-year-old reality Kim Kardashian has publicly condemned hate speech against the Jewish community, by her ex-husband Kanye West.

    Taking to her Twitter, she wrote ‘Hate speech is never OK or excusable. I stand together with the Jewish community and call on the terrible violence and hateful rhetoric toward them to come to an immediate end,’

    Last Friday, Kim was spotted arriving at nine-year-old daughter North’s basketball game in LA alongside her eldest son Saint, six, – with ex-Kanye shortly arriving at the game as well.

    Kanye, who recently said he and Kim were only divorced ‘on paper,’ was seen arriving to the game separately looking somber, amid his string of controversies.

    He recently reignited tensions between himself and Kim by airing out their custody issues and making claims about the SKIMS founder in the media.

    She has reportedly distanced herself from the rapper and ‘isn’t answering Kanye’s calls,’ according to TMZ.

    West and Kardashian share four children: North, nine, Saint, six, Chicago, four, and Psalm, three. West previously stated that his ex-wife ‘basically 80 percent of the time, raise[s] those children.’

    The reality superstar filed for divorce in February 2021 just before what would have been the pair’s seventh wedding anniversary.

  • 2023: What the interest of every politician should be – Jonathan

    2023: What the interest of every politician should be – Jonathan

    Ahead of the 2023 elections, former President Goodluck Jonathan has said the interest of every politician should be the people first, adding that those who are going into politics to make money should rather go into business.

    Jonathan disclosed this in Abuja at the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation 2022 Peace Conference with the theme, “Nation Building: The Role of Peaceful Elections in a Multi-Ethnic Context” while stressing that the biggest threat to democracy is no longer the gun, but propaganda, fake news and disinformation.

    Jonathan urged young Nigerians to embrace good conduct rather than hate speech, saying those advocating for violence and orchestrating fake news were the big threats to democracy.

    “We must discourage this issue of hate speech and propaganda that are going on because before this time, we were always afraid of the gun as a threat to democracy.

    “But the biggest threat to democracy now that we know is the issue of propaganda, fake news and hate speech. Anybody that is an advocate or vanguard of this is a threat to democracy just like the gun.

    “So, our young people should know that we must embrace good conduct that would lead to good elections,’’ Jonathan said.

    Jonathan also advised political parties, their candidates and supporters to put the country first in their conducts towards the 2023 general elections.

    “I always say that, first we must have a country and state before you talk about having a president or having a governor. If you destroy the country, then where do you need a president? We don’t need a president.

    “So, anybody that is interested in leadership at the level of the president, governor, senator etc you have the biggest stake of protecting the country.

    “If you know where nations are in crisis, you will not think about economy and before you know it everything will go down.

    “So, those who want to be president, governors and their supporters should first know that we need a nation before whoever you are supporting can emerge as a governor or president,’’ Jonathan said.

    He added that the interest of every politician should be the people first; saying those who are going into politics to make money should rather go into business.

    Jonathan urged religious leaders and civil society to continue to sensitise Nigerians until the country was better.

    The former president, who noted that the electoral process of the country had improved, said that with the introduction of technology it would continue to be better and faster.

    The Executive Director of the foundation, Ms. Ann Iyonu, said that as the 2023 election approached, there was a compelling need now more than ever for multi-stakeholder consensus building towards ensuring credible, transparent, and peaceful elections in Nigeria.

    Iyonu said that to avoid a situation where elections divide rather than strengthen nations, all stakeholders needed to make a conscious effort to embrace and promote a culture of peace, justice, equity, and fairness for all groups in the polity.

    She said that the aim of the conference was to provide the avenue to examine how the Nigerian democratic space had evolved, discuss the trends and threats to an inclusive and peaceful election.

    “Promote the culture of tolerance among different political actors and highlight best practices for the conduct of credible and violence-free elections in Nigeria.

    “We also hope that at the end of the deliberations, we would have canvassed strategies toward nation-building that will consolidate our nation’s 23 years of democracy and sustain a culture of peaceful elections in the country,” she said.

  • Hate speech: Tunde Bakare in trouble as group demands withdrawal of incitement against Igbo

    Hate speech: Tunde Bakare in trouble as group demands withdrawal of incitement against Igbo

    Fiery clergyman, Pastor Tunde Bakare is in trouble as a group under the aegis of Igbo Board of Deputies demands he withdraws his alleged incitement against the Igbo race within the next seven days or face litigation.

    The group in a letter obtained by TheNewsGuru.com, (TNG) stated that :

    “We have waited reverently for Lent and Easter period to end before addressing this letter to you. It is our instruction not to join you in the desecration of a very sacred and holy Lenten season; it being the bedrock of the Christian faith all over the world.

    The group argued that:” Your hate speech and your premeditated incitement designed for ethnic cleansing of the Igbo people in Nigeria was aired and viewed right at the heart of Lent.

    “You are a pastor of a church indeed. We have waited without success for you to, own your accord, recant your hate speech and/or withdraw the incitement of genocide against the Igbo people.

    ” It is very obvious that your speech on the day was well thought out, planned, and executed so as to achieve the purpose it was designed. These comments were made deliberately at a very fragile and tensed period in the history of Nigeria, when insecurity and killings are rife.

    “We are advised that on and about April 2022, you on the pulpit of Citadel Global Community Church in Lagos, Nigeria “your church” and before a multitude of congregants, worshippers, and viewers all of the world, made
    inciting comments against the Igbo people in the following manner: “on the day the late Tafawa Balewa was killed the Igbo soldiers arrested him, removed his turban, poured wine on his head, and forced him to drink and then shot him.

    “While he was being killed, he cursed the Igbo race; that they would never govern Nigeria”

    “Here is the YouTube link for ease of reference: https://youtu.be/vlf57qcE5qc

    ” We are of the view that your comments on the day were calculated to rouse and stoke hatred against the Igbo by a region of the country.

    “These were the sort of falsehood sold to other regions of Nigeria as part of the hate campaign that justified and resulted in the mass murder and subsequent pogrom against the Igbo before, during and after the 1967 Nigeria Biafra civil war that reportedly claimed over 3 million lives of the Igbo.

    “We are advised that your own account of the 1966 military coup and in particular the death of the then Prime Minister of Nigeria; Alhaji Tafawa
    Balewa is false because you were not present and therefore cannot qualify as
    a credible witness.

    “In the circumstance, we have been instructed to demand from you, as we hereby do, to recant your statements using the same pulpit within 7 days from the date hereof. Failing which, we have instructions to approach the appropriate forum, both local and international, for all available legal relief.

    These actions shall be at your account.

    ” We hope the above does not become necessary, and we do not wish you to enter into this quagmire.

    “Kindly note that our clients shall enforce their rights and their resolve within the ambit of both domestic and international laws, unless and until you have publicly withdrawn your false comments.

  • NMA backs striking resident doctors, accuses Ngige of hate speech

    NMA backs striking resident doctors, accuses Ngige of hate speech

    The Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) has declared support for the striking doctors under the aegis of Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD).

    The foremost medical body also accused the Minister of Labour and Productivity Dr. Chris Ngige of hate speech for the way he spoke during a Channels Television aired on Friday night.

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG reports that the minister had during the interview said will Federal Government will implement the ‘no work, no pay’ on the striking National Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) if they refuse to resume work.

    “By Tuesday, I will invite them back. If they become recalcitrant, there are other things I can do. There are weapons in the Labour Laws, I will invoke them. There is no work, no pay.

    Their employers have a role also to keep their business afloat, to keep patients alive. They can employ local doctors. We won’t get there but if we are going to get there, we will use that stick” the minister said during the interview.

    In a swift response the NMA tackled claims by Ngige who also doubles as a medical doctor. Read press release below:

    PRESS RELEASE
    RESIDENT DOCTORS ARE PAID ALL OVER THE WORLD

    The attention of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) has been drawn to a recent live interview granted on Channels TV on Friday, 2nd April 2021, by the Honourable Minister of Labour and Productivity, HE, Senator Dr Chris Ngige OON.

    In the interview, the Honourable Minister alleged that in the United States of America (USA) and other developed countries, Resident Doctors pay for their residency training abroad, whereas in Nigeria, the government pays them.

    In as much as we appreciate the efforts being made by the government to resolve the issues that have led to this avoidable and unnecessary industrial action by the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD), the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) wishes to clarify the misinformation by the Honourable Minister in
    the interview, which is seriously viewed to be a hate speech capable of bringing down the health system in Nigeria and thereby worsening the health care delivery and further escalate the rather unimaginable current brain drain.

    In the United States of America and other developed countries, Resident Doctors work as they are being trained and they are paid by their employers. In the United Kingdom, the employer of Resident Doctors is the NHS, which is similar to what is obtainable in Nigeria.

    Furthermore, Residents also pay to take their postgraduate Medical examinations in the developed countries, which is what also obtains in Nigeria.

    The NMA is totally in disagreement with the way and manner some government functionaries carry out their duties’ which is completely insensitive to the plight of the people.

    Accountability is the fulcrum for good governance in all facets and we do not demand anything less from those charged with the responsibility of governing the people.

    In order to resolve the lingering crisis in the Nigerian health sector, the NMA urges the government to prioritise and improve the healthcare delivery to Nigerians and at the same time improve the welfare of Medical practitioners and other health workers, which is considered the most sustainable means of delivering quality health care to the people who in the first place elected them.

    Perhaps, this will help to reduce the current brain drain being experienced that is dealing a deadly blow to our health care delivery system, which has made our hospitals to be regarded as mere Consulting Clinics.

    The NMA wishes to assure Nigerians that it is willing to partner with the governments towards enhancing quality health care delivery in Nigeria, despite the persistent provocation from its functionaries.

  • Hate speech on Facebook poses ‘acute challenges to human dignity’ – UN expert

    Hate speech on Facebook poses ‘acute challenges to human dignity’ – UN expert

    An independent UN human rights expert on Wednesday called on Facebook’s Oversight Board to give greater consideration to the rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities before making decisions over controversial content, particularly involving hate speech.

    “Minorities are the most likely target of online hate speech, and we know that online hate speech against minorities often leads to severe real-world harm, and may even lead to ethnic cleansing and genocide,” said Fernand de Varennes, UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues, welcoming the recent news that Facebook’s Oversight Board has accepted its first six cases appealing against decisions to remove content.

    “Hate speech online is one of today’s most acute challenges to human dignity and life,” he added.

    A UN statement said Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg compared the Oversight Board to the social media platform’s own Supreme Court, as an independent body that reviews Facebook moderation decisions.

    Facebook’s Community Standards should be brought into line with the understanding of “hate speech” in the recent UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech, according to Mr. de Varennes, who viewed the platform’s omission to protect linguistic minorities as troubling and contrary to international human rights law.

    The statement said he directed the Board’s attention to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the UN General Assembly’s 1992 Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, as well as other legal rulings on the rights of minorities.

    At the same time, the independent UN expert called the Oversight Board “an innovative and ambitious initiative to regulate online expression, in particular hate speech, which is essential for the effective protection of vulnerable minorities worldwide”.

    Moreover, he commended the fact that the Board is made up of prominent experts committed to human rights and freedom of expression, and noted that efforts have been made to ensure impartiality by having an independent trust administer it.

    The statement said during 2020, the Special Rapporteur has made “hate speech, Social Media and minorities” his thematic focus.

    He convened regional conferences in Europe and Asia, and presided over the UN Forum on Minority Issues in November. Together, the three conventions have made more than 100 recommendations for tackling online hate speech against minorities.

    “I look forward to continuing to constructively engage with the Oversight Board and hope I can assist in its institutional development and on issues related to minorities,” Mr. de Varennes said.

    Special Rapporteurs and independent experts are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights theme or a country situation. The positions are honorary and the experts are not UN staff, nor are they paid for their work.

  • Lai Mohammed makes U-turn, denies announcing N5m hate speech fine

    Lai Mohammed makes U-turn, denies announcing N5m hate speech fine

    Nigeria’s Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, has denied announcing an increase in the hate speech fine to N5m despite video evidence.

    Mohammed had announced the increase in hate speech fine during the unveiling of the Reviewed Broadcasting code in August.

    Days after the announcement, the minister while featuring on a TVC programme on Friday, August 7, 2020, explained that the fine was increased to deter people willingly violating the provision to destabilise the country.

    However, Mohammed in a counter-affidavit in response to an originating motion filed to challenge the fine before a Federal High Court in Lagos by human rights lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, denied making the announcement.

    Effiong is currently challenging the fine by the National Broadcasting Commission on Nigeria Info FM.

    The radio station was fined for alleged hate speech.

    Obadiah Mailafia, former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, had alleged that a Northern governor was one of the leaders of Boko Haram.

    “Paragraph 19 is denied. The 2nd defendant (Mohammed) did not announce an increment in any fine for hate speech from N500,000 to N5,000,000 or any other because there is a governmental body or institution mandated to regulate and enforce the Nigerian Broadcasting Code,” an affidavit deposed to by a Litigation Secretary at the Federal Ministry of Information and Culture, Sunday Ojobo, reads.

    The minister further stated that the constitution allows for human rights to be suspended for the sake of national interest.

    He wrote, “The constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria provides for derogation from fundamental rights in the interest of public safety, public order and for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons.”

  • Edo 2020: Purveyors of hate speech, violence should face full weight of the law – NEBPRIL

    Edo 2020: Purveyors of hate speech, violence should face full weight of the law – NEBPRIL

    Ahead of the Edo State Governorship election coming up at the weekend, the Network for Best Practice and Integrity in Leadership (NEBPRIL) has called on political actors and stakeholders in the state to desist from inflammatory comments, violence and other tendencies that could potentially mar the polls.

    NEBPRIL made the call in Abuja on Sunday in a statement signed by its chairman, Hon. Victor Afam Ogene, a former member House of Representatives, who said “it is frightening and worrisome, how stakeholders in the project have allowed rancour, bitterness and violence to define the path to the poll”.

    NEBPRIL warned that “Violence prone persons, no matter how highly placed, should not be treated with kid gloves. Rather, the full weight of the law should be brought to bear on anyone or group, irrespective of status, that continues to engage in hate speech, vandalism and violence.

    “The success of the September 19 Edo governorship elections should not be seen to be the duty and responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), security agencies and the candidates only. It behooves all stakeholders, including eligible voters and non-voters, to see to the success of that election,” the statement reads.

    The CSO that advocates best practice and good ethics, said it was “concerned that the language of political campaigns in the state instead of embodying the principles of restraint, decency and accommodation, has rather lighted a match on the incendiary vices of incivility, discourtesy and the unrestrained propensity to unleash violence and inflict harm on opponents.

    “Predictably, this traditional pattern of leaning towards electoral violence to advance or consolidate positions of strength, has already led to some clashes among contending political parties,” the statement further reads.

    NEBPRIL noted that a pre-election survey conducted by election monitoring group, Yiaga Africa and Polling Analysis Databank Strategy (NOIPolls) showed that “voters and election officers are concerned that electoral violence and intimidation – which are already being witnessed in the run-up to the elections – would not only mar the credibility of the polls, but may also lead to loss of lives and property if not immediately curtailed.

    “As a group that advocates integrity and best practices in leadership and public conduct, NEBPRIL is particularly worried that part of what has engendered this culture of violence is when key actors resort to the pouring of personal invectives and attacks on opponents, rather than projecting their manifestoes and programmes.

    “It is reprehensible and condemnable that opponents could go to the length of castigating the wife of one of the contestants for not having a child. We also have seen some candidates say they would return violence for violence. This falls far below the acceptable democratic standards expected of politicians, who in the first instance are aspiring to serve the people and the nation.

    “This resort to taking away the cherished values of democracy and the freedom of participation and resorting to casting personal aspersions could inflame the spirit of resentment and indignation and therefore ingrain prejudice and discontent.

    “While we commend institutions such as the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the security agencies who have taken records of the hate speeches and violent behavior of candidates in the Edo election and have put in certain measures to ensure a peaceful poll, we urge them to raise the bar as the election date draws near to ensure that efforts already made to guarantee a credible election are not in in vain.

    “There is also need for INEC to address perceptions of its lack of independence, impartiality and professionalism, particularly in the application of electoral guidelines and transparency during the collation of results,” NEBPRIL stated.