Tag: High Court

  • Conflicting orders: Three High Court judges summoned to NJC panel

    Conflicting orders: Three High Court judges summoned to NJC panel

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has set up a probe panel to investigate three High Court judges who issued conflicting ex-parte orders.

    According to the NJC, the judges are to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against them for their actions.

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG reports that the investigative committee was set up by the council, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Honourable Justice Tanko Muhammad at its 95th meeting held on September 15 and 16 in line with the principles of fair hearing.

    TNG reports that Justice Muhammad, who expressed displeasure over the development, had threatened without mentioning names that three of the judges who issued the controversial orders would be made scapegoats.

    “We shall make an example with these three judges and never shall we condone such [an] act,” the CJN was quoted as saying in a statement issued by NJC spokesman, Soji Oye.

    Last week, Justice Muhammed held a marathon meeting with the six chief judges in the affected jurisdictions of Rivers, Kebbi, Cross River, Jigawa, Anambra, and Imo over the conflicting ex parte orders.

    He warned that the judiciary would no longer condone indiscipline or allow any judge to tarnish the image of the judiciary.

  • Senate receives Buhari’s request to confirm Salisu Garba as FCT CJ

    Senate receives Buhari’s request to confirm Salisu Garba as FCT CJ

    Senate, on Tuesday at plenary received a request from President Muhammadu Buhari, to confirm the appointment of Acting Chief Judge of the FCT High Court, Hon. Justice Salisu Garba Abdullahi, as substantive Chief Judge.

    Buhari’s request is contained in a letter read by President of Senate , Ahmad Lawan.

    Buhari, in the letter said his request was made pursuant to Section 256 subsection 1 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    The letter reads in part: “Request for the confirmation of the appointment of Hon. Justice Salisu Garba Abdullahi as the Chief Judge for the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory Abuja.

    “Pursuant to Section 256(1) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

    “I hereby request for the Senate’s confirmation of the appointment of Hon. Justice Salisu Garba Abdullahi, the acting Chief Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, as substantive Chief Judge of the Court.

    “I trust that the Senate will favorably confirm Hon. Justice Salisu Abdullahi as substantive Chief Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, in the usual expeditious manner.”

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Tanko Muhammad, inaugurated Garba as the acting Chief Judge of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

    Garba hails from Malumfashi local government area of Katsina state.

    He was called to the bar in 1984, and he completed his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme in 1985.

    Garba was appointed as a magistrate of the FCT high court in 1989.

    In 1997, he became the chief registrar of the FCT high court, and was appointed a judge of the FCT high court in 1998.

  • Gov. Fayemi appoints Perm Sec as Judge of Ekiti High Court

    Gov. Fayemi appoints Perm Sec as Judge of Ekiti High Court

    Gov. Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti, on Sunday appointed Mr Adeniyi Familoni, a Lawyer and current Permanent Secretary, Bureau of Chieftaincy Affairs, as Judge of the High court of Ekiti State.

    The appointment followed the recommendation of the National Judicial Council, which found Familoni suitable for appointment, the government said.

    Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, Olayinka Oyebode, made this known in a statement on Sunday, in Ado-Ekiti.

    Oyebode said Familoni began his career as a Legal Officer in the then old Ondo State Ministry of Justice in 1996, and later, Ekiti State Ministry of Justice.

    During his service years in the Ekiti justice ministry, Familoni, at various times held offices such as the Director, Law Review, Director Citizens Rights, Director Civil Litigations and Director Public Prosecutions, he said in the statement.

    He was appointed Permanent Secretary in the Ekiti State Civil Service in April, 2019 and posted to Bureau of Chieftaincy Affairs, it said.

    According to the statement, Fayemi is set to formally swear in Familoni on Tuesday, at the Conference Hall of the Governor’s Office.

  • Armed robbers storm high court, injure 2 policemen

    Armed robbers storm high court, injure 2 policemen

    Eight armed robbers stormed the Bulawayo High Court in Zimbabwe on Sunday and injured two police officers as they tried to break open the registry safe using a grinder, state media reported on Monday.

    The robbers gained entry into the court’s criminal registry after attacking and disarming police officers manning the premises.

    Police spokesperson Paul Nyathi confirmed the incident and said investigations are underway.

    The incident occurred at about 4 a.m. and the suspects were reportedly armed with pistols.

    Bulawayo is Zimbabwe’s second largest city.

    “We are investigating an armed robbery case which occurred at the Bulawayo High Court, Sunday morning at 4 a.m.

    “It is said about eight suspects went to the court and attacked two officers who were on duty and these suspects were armed with pistols.

    “After attacking them, they blindfolded one of the officers. They then tried to force open the court’s main safe to the criminal registry’s office using a key.

    “After failing, they tried again to use a grinder and, in the process, it is alleged that they were making phone calls,” Nyathi said.

    He said after failing in their attempts, they tied the hands and legs of one of the police officers.

    The officer who sustained some serious injuries was taken to hospital.

    “They attacked him using their weapons. He is being treated at a hospital in Bulawayo, but we cannot reveal where he is receiving treatment,” Nyathi said.

    “These guys had inside information and we want to establish the motive behind the robbery and the attack on the officers.

    “We are, therefore, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to get to the bottom of this case and apprehend the suspects.

    “The law will definitely take its course,” he added.

    Judicial Service Commission spokesperson Rumbidzai Takawira said the commission had deployed a team from Harare to assess the situation.

    “`We have a team that is going there to ascertain what really transpired and we can only have information tomorrow (Monday),” said Takawira.

    A legal expert who declined to be named said an exhibit safe room can contain files or prosecution documents for suspects appearing before the courts.

    “A crime registry can store exhibits which include weapons used by criminals in committing crimes.

    “The exhibits are very vital in the prosecution process and probably these robbers wanted to steal these exhibits or destroy important documents,” said the expert.

  • Depp severed finger during three-day row with ex-wife-UK court

    Depp severed finger during three-day row with ex-wife-UK court

    Hollywood star Johnny Depp wrote on a wall with blood from his severed finger tip during a long and violent confrontation with his ex-wife Amber Heard five years ago, London’s High Court heard on Thursday at his libel case against a British tabloid.

    Depp told the court he suffered “some species of nervous breakdown” during a row with actress Heard, but denied he had violently attacked her and accused her of cutting his finger by throwing a bottle at him.

    The revelations came on the third day of Depp’s appearance in the witness stand as he sues the publisher of Britain’s Sun tabloid, News Group Newspapers, over an article in which it labelled the actor a “wife beater”.

    The court heard that Depp was in Australia in March 2015 to film “Pirates of the Caribbean” a month after the couple married.

    Heard had flown to join him from London, where she had been making a movie with co-star Billy Bob Thornton.

    The Sun’s lawyer Sasha Wass said Heard suffered a three-day ordeal at Depp’s hands in the rented house where the actor was staying after she became angry at him because he had been drinking to excess and taking drugs.

    Consumed with jealousy about Heard and Thornton, Depp attacked her, constantly swigging from a bottle, Wass said.

    He slapped Heard across the face, pushed her against the fridge and smashed her head against it, and she barricaded herself in her bedroom to escape him, the court was told.

    Wass said at one stage Depp spat in her face, grabbed her by the throat and told her it would be easy to crush her neck.

    “Fabricated and vicious,” Depp replied, rejecting all the accusations which he says form part of a hoax by his ex-wife.

    He agreed the couple had a violent row on the final day that began because he wanted Heard to sign a post-nuptial agreement, and he had not been drinking until that point.

    Depp described the Australian incident as the end of the marriage, after which it was only going to get worse.

    Depp said Heard threw two vodka bottles at him, the second of which “severed my finger and crushed my bones”.

    “That is when I began what I feel was perhaps some species of a nervous breakdown,” he told the court. “I couldn’t live, didn’t want to live.”

    He said he began to write messages on the wall in blood using his severed finger, before then using paint. One message on a mirror said: “Starring Billy Bob, Easy Amber”.

    He agreed he might have ripped a telephone off the wall and smashed it and told Heard that she had ruined his life.

    Wass told the court the house was a scene of “carnage” with paint everywhere and windows and the television smashed. It caused $75,000 of damage, according to Depp’s assistant.

    Earlier, Depp denied attacking Heard while undergoing detox to ease himself off prescription drugs on his private island in the Bahamas in August 2014.

    Depp told the court it was the “lowest point of my life”, when he was in a great deal of pain, suffering uncontrollable spasms and sobbing like a child on the floor.

    He accused Heard of withholding medication that would ease the process, calling it “one of the cruellest things that she has ever done”, the court was told.

    However, Wass said Heard, 34, was following instructions from Depp’s medical team and pointed out she had contacted a nurse who was staying on the island to say he was screaming and had pushed her.

    “I did not push Miss Heard or attack her in any way,” Depp said. “I was not in a condition to do so in any case.”

    Depp has told the court that the abuse allegations were a hoax, and Heard appeared to have been building a dossier as an insurance policy.

    The trial is due to last three weeks.

  • APC crisis: Rivers High Court sends Victor Giadom packing

    …says he is not a member of APC

    A Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt has sent acting National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Victor Giadom packing.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the Rivers State High Court declared that Giadom is not a member of the party.

    This spells more troubles as the court declared that after resigning from the party to contest the position of Deputy Governor in 2019 guber in Rivers, Giadom ceases to be a member of the APC NWC.

    It was gathered that the court presided over by Justice Florence Fiberesima granted an order of perpetual injunction restraining Giadom from parading himself as a member of the National Working Committee (NWC) of the APC in a suit filed by Dele Moses & Others.

    The order was made sequel to a motion exparte brought before the court by the plaintiffs, Dele Moses and Azunda Wori against the APC, Adams Oshiomhole, Victor Giadom; the Acting Chairman of APC, Rivers State, Igo Aguma and the National Legal Adviser, APC, Babatunde Ogala.

    The court also granted an order restraining Giadom from issuing, signing or endorsing any document or correspondence to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) or any other body or institution in the capacity of the National Chairman or Acting National Chairman of the APC or howsoever as an officer of the APC.

    A copy of the interim order signed by Assistant Chief Registrar, Patricia Victor, mandated the APC not to recognize Giadom named as the third defendant in the case as a member of the NWC.

    The plaintiffs prayed for: “A declaration that sequel to the resignation of the 3rd defendant (Victor Giadom) as Deputy National Secretary of the 1st Defendant (APC) in 2018, for the purposes of contesting in the 2019 general election as Deputy Governor of Rivers State, the 3rd defendant is no longer the Deputy National Secretary of the 1st defendant.

    “A declaration that the third defendant (Victor Giadom) is not a member of the National Working Committee ( NWC) of the first defendant having resigned his membership of the National Working Committee (NWC) of the first defendant for purposes of contesting in the 2019 general election as the Deputy Governor of Rivers State.

    “A declaration that the resignation of the third defendant (Victor Giadom) as the Deputy National Secretary of the 1st Defendant in 2018 is valid and effective from 2018 till date.

    “A declaration that the third defendant (Victor Giadom) is not the National Chairman, or Acting National Chairman,or Deputy National Secretary or otherwise howsoever a member of the National Working Committee of the 1st Defendant.

    “An order restraining the third defendant (Victor Giadom) from issuing, signing or endorsing any document or correspondence to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) or any other body or institution in the capacity of the National Chairman or Acting National Chairman of the 1st Defendant or howsoever as an officer of the 1st Defendant.

    “An order of perpetual injunction restraining the first, second, fourth and fifth defendants from recognizing or regarding the third defendant as either a member of the National Working Committee (NWC), the Deputy National Secretary, National Chairman or Acting National Chairman of the fist defendant”.

    While granting the prayers, the court said: “That an interim injunction be and is hereby made restraining Giadom acting by himself or through his privies or agents howsoever described from parading himself as the National Chairman of the first defendant or Deputy National Secretary of the first defendant or member of the NWC of the first defendant pending the determination of the motion on notice.

    “That an interim injunction be and is hereby made restraining Giadom from issuing, signing, or endorsing any document to INEC or any other body or institution in the capacity of the National Chairman or acting National Chairman of the first defendant or in whatsoever capacity pending the determination of the motion on notice.

    “That an order of interim injunction be and is hereby made restraining the first, second, fourth and fifth defendants acting by themselves or through any of their officers, agents or privies from recognizing or regarding Giadom as the national chairman of the first defendant or deputy national secretary of member of the NWC of the first defendant.

    “That every order in this suit including the originating process and other subsequent processes be served on the defendants at the first defendant secretariat at 65 Aba Road, Port Harcourt, Rivers State by pasting same on the notice board”.

  • Judge apologises to lawyers over poor toilet facility in Jos High Court

    Judge apologises to lawyers over poor toilet facility in Jos High Court

    Justice Daniel Longji of a Jos State High Court on Thursday apologized to lawyers over lack of functional toilet facilities it the Jos High Court premise.

    The Judge, apologised to Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), the EFCC Prosecuting Counsel in Sen. Jonah Jang’s N6.3 billion fraud case, pleaded with the Bar to help the Judiciary in the mess it has found itself in.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Jang case was on when the judge suggested a 20 minutes stand down to enable people who want to visit the restrooms to do so.

    Jacobs had agreed with the judge but Longji, told him there were no functional restrooms in the court premises.

    “I have to apologise to you over the none availability of a functional toilet facility in the whole of this High Court premises. The situation here is this bad.

    “You on the Bar, must come to the assistance of the judiciary considering the situation it has found itself in this time around.

    “I can’t imagine that in the whole of this premise, there is no single functional toilet facility that could cater for the people coming here for ligations, ’’ Longji lamented.

    Responding, Chief Mike Ezekhome (SAN), Counsel to Jang, assured the Judge of the Bar’s readiness to assist in the area of raising the matter with the authorities.

    “Sir, we at the Bar are always fighting for you, particularly my very self, I will not stop fighting for the judiciary. For a whole High Court like this to be without a functional toilet facility is very unfortunate.

    “We shall as lawyers take this matter serious to stop the embarrassment and the inconveniences being caused litigants that troop in here for one thing or the other, ’’ Ezekhome assured.

    “I done a lot of write ups and carried out some crusades in my fights for the judiciary. This situation the judge talked about is very unfortunate and uncalled for.’’

    NAN’s findings revealed that virtually all the toilets, lacked running water and can’t be used by anybody. (NAN)

    Speaking to NAN, the Registrar of the Court, Mr Geoffrey Kamyal, said: “we renovated some of the toilets. Another challenge is lack of running water.

    “We are using well water at the High Court premises now.

    “Just as the Judge pointed out, most time it’s the Nigeria Bar Association that fight for the Judiciary for some things to be put right in the Judiciary.

    “Our challenge is that our monthly subventions hardly comes as expected, which usually hinders us from putting somethings right for the good of the people coming around the High Court, ’’ Kamyal explained.

  • 2019: APC reacts to High Court judgment nullifying party primaries in Rivers

    2019: APC reacts to High Court judgment nullifying party primaries in Rivers

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) has said it is still studying the judgement of the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, which nullified the primaries conducted in the state.

    The APC National Publicity Secretary, Lanre Issa-Onilu, said this in a terse message on Monday.

    He said, “We have received the news of the judgement of the Federal High Court regarding our candidates in Rivers State.

    We are currently studying the decision of the court.

    We will make our position public in due course.”

     

  • Osun 2018: High Court’s judgment vindicates me – Sen. Adeleke

    Osun 2018: High Court’s judgment vindicates me – Sen. Adeleke

    Senator Ademola Adeleke, the governorship candidate of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Osun for Sept. 22 election, said the Wednesday State High Court judgment had vindicated him.

    Adeleke, while reacting to the court judgment at a news conference on Thursday in Ede, said that the court’s verdict affirmed that the case of certificate forgery could not be established against him.

    According to him, those questioning the authenticity of my certificate were being mischievous and deceptive.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that two members of PDP in the state, Rasheed Olabayo and Oluwaseun Idowu, had challenged the outcome of the party primary election won by Adeleke.

    They contended that Adeleke did not satisfy the constitutional requirements to contest the governorship election.

    The plaintiffs, among others, urged the court to set aside the outcome of the primary election, alleging that Adeleke did not submit his secondary school certificate.

    However, Justice David Oladimeji had cleared Adeleke to contest the governorship election, saying that the plaintiff’s Counsel, Mr Olufemi Ayandokun, failed to address the issue of forgery in the originating summons.

    Adeleke, briefing newsmen along with his old school mates, said that he attended Ede Muslim High School in Osun between 1976 and 1981.

    “I express my gratitude to the judiciary for upholding the truth despite the pressure.

    “It is now clear and proven that I did not forge any certificate or testimonial,’’ the PDP flagbearer said.

    Adeleke, representing Osun West at the Upper Chamber of the National Assembly, urged all the party members to support him in winning the governorship election.

    “Now that legal pronouncement has been made, internal mechanism has been exhausted, it is time for all PDP members and leaders to unite and work for the party’s victory,” he said.

    NAN also reports that Adeleke was declared the winner of the PDP primary election held on July 21.

    He polled 1,569 votes to beat his closest rival, Dr Akin Ogunbiyi, who polled 1,562.

    NAN

  • Stolen funds: EFCC kicks against Bafarawa’s acquittal

    Stolen funds: EFCC kicks against Bafarawa’s acquittal

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has described as “shocking and unacceptable” the ruling by Justice Bello Abbas of the Sokoto State High Court that discharged and acquitted a former governor of Sokoto State Attahiru Dalhatu Bafarawa.

    TheNewsGuru reports Justice Abbas on Tuesday discharged and acquitted former governor Bafarawa and four others of a 22 count charge of conspiracy, criminal misappropriation, theft and receiving of stolen funds.

    Others acquitted alongside Bafarawa are Beedash Nigeria Limited, Nasdabap Nigeria Limited, Alhaji Nasiru Dalhatu Bafarawa and Alhaji Salihu Maibuhu Gummi.

    In the course of the trial the EFCC had called nine witnesses and presented several documents that were admitted in evidence while the defendants called only six witnesses.

    “Surprisingly, Justice Abbas discharged and acquitted the accused persons of all counts on the premise that the evidence presented by the prosecution were “mere hearsay”, that there were “no documentary evidence” to back up the claim of witnesses.

    “The Commission believes that the judge erred in law and has mandated its counsel to immediately appeal the ruling at the Court of Appeal,” the EFCC stated.

    The Judgment of Justice Abbas is the climax in the series of twists and turns that the trial had witnessed over the last nine years or so.

    The defendants alongside twelve others were first arraigned on 47 counts on December 16, 2009 before the Sokoto State High Court.

    Upon arraignment, they all pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against them by the Commission.

    Soon after their arraignment, the defendants filed a motion asking the court to quash the charges against them. The said motion was dismissed by both the trial court and the court of appeal.

    On the 29th of September, 2011, the prosecution filed an amended 44 count charge against the accused persons.

    However while the case was on going, one of the accused, Abdullahi Bida died while another, Aisha Mohammed Binji was discharged following a nolle prosequi application filed by the then Attorney General of Sokoto State.