Tag: IPOB

  • Umuahia, Enugu standstill as IPOB enforces Biafra day

    Umuahia, Enugu standstill as IPOB enforces Biafra day

    Commercial and public activities were grounded across some eastern states, this includes, Enugu State, Umuahia, the capital city of Abia State on Friday as residents adhered strictly to the sit-at-home order issued by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPoB) in commemoration of fallen Biafran heroes.

    TheNewsGuru reports that Biafra Day, observed annually on May 30, commemorates the 1967 declaration of the defunct Republic of Biafra by the late Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu.

    Although not officially recognised by the state or federal government, the day has taken root among many in the South East as a solemn remembrance of the Nigerian Civil War and its aftermath.

    In Enugu metropolis, TNG observed the closure of banks, markets, fuel stations, and schools. Public servants were seen briefly signing attendance registers before promptly returning home.

    As for Umuahia, the usually bustling streets were largely deserted, with the only signs of life being sporadic movements of tricycles and a few vehicles. 

    Shops along major roads remained shut, with markets and motor parks also following suit in compliance with the order.

    Banks across the city kept their doors closed to customers, and educational institutions, both public and private, remained closed, with students and pupils staying at home.

    Despite the lack of commercial activities, some youths were seen occupying the empty streets, engaging in a friendly game of soccer.

    Elsewhere, small groups of people gathered at the entrances of their homes, discussing the latest political and security developments in the country.

    The spokesman for IPOB, Emma Powerful, confirmed the lockdown, stating that the day has been set aside specifically to commemorate the sacrifices made by those who fought for the Biafra cause.

    Interestingly, the usual presence of security forces was not observed on the streets, and, as of the time of reporting, there had been no reported clashes between security agents and those enforcing the sit-at-home order.

  • JUST IN:  Schools, markets,  offices shut in Imo over sit-at-home order

    JUST IN: Schools, markets, offices shut in Imo over sit-at-home order

    Markets, schools and offices shut down on Friday based on the sit-at-home order by a
    separatist group, the Movement for the Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) in Imo State.

    The development brought economic activities to a standstill.

    The roads were empty, with only a handful of commercial vehicles plying the routes within and outside Owerri, the state capital.

    Details shortly…

  • You have no moral right to link IPOB to terrorism – AVID challenges Ribadu

    You have no moral right to link IPOB to terrorism – AVID challenges Ribadu

    The American Veterans of Igbo Descent (AVID) has challenged the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu that he has no moral standing to link or accused Indigenous People of Biafra ( IPOB ) of terrorism and being responsible for the destruction of police stations and correctional centers across the country.

    The group also described Ribadu’s comment linking IPOB to criminality as brazen lies, hate speech, and incitement, that is not only subjudice but a disgraceful abuse of public office.

    AVID noted that declaring IPOB guilty in the media was tantamount to gross interference with judicial independence that in any civilized society should attract immediate sanctions from the court.

    The group stated this on Sunday in a statement signed by Chief Dr. Sylvester Onyia while reacting to the recent outburst by Ribadu attributing violent attacks on the police stations and correctional centers to IPOB.

    The statement faulted Ribadu’s outburst describing it as ridiculous, absurd and unacceptable noting that the National Security Adviser have no moral standing to speak of terrorism while blood from his own backyard runs freely down the streets of Sokoto, Zamfara, Niger, Borno, Katsina, and other states plagued by Fulani militia, bandits, and terrorists.

    The statement read “ The American Veterans of Igbo Descent (AVID), an organization representing proud Igbo people who have served or are currently serving with honor in the United States Armed Forces, categorically condemns the recent reckless and deeply offensive statements by Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu.

    “His media campaign against the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and Eastern Security Network (ESN), filled with brazen lies, hate speech, and incitement, is not only sub judice but a disgraceful abuse of public office.

    “Let us remind Ribadu that he presides over an intelligence architecture that stands indicted by its own witnesses. On 22 May 2025, a star government witness (PW-BBB) testified under oath that the DSS-Nigeria’ssecret police-is under the direct control of the National Intelligence Agency and, by extension, the National Security Adviser.

    “That same Ribadu now feels emboldened to declare IPOB guilty in the media, even as the trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is ongoing, is an egregious interference with judicial independence that in any civilized society should attract immediate sanctions from the court.

    “Mallam Ribadu, your statements are not just contemptuous-they are dangerous. They reveal the mindset of a regime that conflates dissent with terrorism, civil disobedience with war crimes, and regional aspirations with rebellion.

    “Sir, you have no moral standing to speak of terrorism while blood from your own backyard runs freely down the streets of Sokoto, Zamfara, Niger, Borno, Katsina, and other states plagued by Fulani militia, bandits, and terrorists that your government has consistently failed-or refused to name and confront.

    “How many times have you, Ribadu, addressed the media about the sacking of hundreds of indigenous villages in the Middle Belt and South by Fulani herdsmen? How many internally displaced Nigerians have died from hunger and disease in the so-called IDP camps scattered across Northern Nigeria, camps that bear haunting”.

  • IPOB accuses FG of hiring witness against Nnamdi Kanu

    IPOB accuses FG of hiring witness against Nnamdi Kanu

    The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has accused the Nigerian government of hiring a  as prosecution witness ( PW-BBB) in the ongoing trial of their leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

    The group alleged that the witness was not a personnel of Department of State Services  ( DSS ) adding that the said individual is affiliated to a law firm and  has no legitimate connection to DSS operations.

    IPOB disclosed this in a statement signed by  Media and Publicity Secretary, Comrade Emma Powerful on Friday in Abuja.

    The statement noted that the PW-BBB’s name and statement were never disclosed in the original list of prosecution witnesses served to the defense. It stated further that the last-minute substitution amounts to trial by ambush, a prosecutorial misconduct that should be rebuked and sanctioned.

    IPOB therefore called on the trial judge Justice James Omotosho to take judicial notice of the development and ensure that such abuse of process is not permitted to taint the sanctity of the courtroom.

    The statement read “  IPOB strongly condemns the Nigerian government’s continued abuse of legal process and deployment of deception in the ongoing trial of our leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The latest disgraceful development is the presentation of an individual referred to as Prosecution Witness BBB (PW-BBB)—a man who does not work for the Department of State Services (DSS) and who has been exposed under cross-examination as a government-planted mercenary.

    “This individual is receiving strategic coaching to impersonate an informed insider when in reality, he has no legitimate connection to DSS operations or the detention regime under which Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has been unjustly held. His courtroom performance—peppered with statements like “I don’t know,” “It’s not my job,” “No one informed me”—reveals a witness wholly ignorant of the facts and unqualified to provide any reliable testimony.

    “It is particularly alarming that PW-BBB’s name and statement were never disclosed in the original list of prosecution witnesses served to the defense. This last-minute substitution amounts to trial by ambush, a prosecutorial misconduct that should be rebuked and sanctioned. IPOB calls on the Honourable Justice James Omotosho to take judicial notice of this underhanded tactic and ensure such abuse of process is not permitted to taint the sanctity of the courtroom.

    “Moreover, the facts surrounding Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s detention are clear and verifiable. Solitary confinement is a standard DSS operational protocol, and numerous independent reports have confirmed that our leader is being subjected to this inhumane condition. UK Consular staff who conduct periodic visits to Mazi Kanu are aware of this, and DSS internal records can corroborate it. No hired actor or government witness can alter these truths.

    “The attempt to lend credibility to the lies of a coached stranger is not only a disservice to justice, but also a profound insult to the Nigerian judiciary. IPOB calls on media houses to resist becoming echo chambers for state propaganda. Upholding truth, objectivity, and constitutional principles is more urgent now than ever.

    “We assure the public and the international community that the identity, role, and deception of PW-BBB will be fully exposed. The Nigerian government must be held accountable for its continued manipulation of the judicial process. Justice must prevail. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu must be released unconditionally”.

  • Police nab 3 suspected IPOB members, recover N10m

    Police nab 3 suspected IPOB members, recover N10m

    The Imo Police command has arrested three suspected members of the proscribed Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) at a hideout in Okigwe Local Government Area of the state.

    The command’s Spokesman, DSP Henry Okoye, who disclosed this in Owerri on Friday said that the arrest was sequel to “sustained operational momentum against criminal elements threatening public safety in the state.”

    “On April 17, 2025, at about 0120hrs, operatives of the command’s Tactical Teams, in synergy with local vigilante groups, acted on credible intelligence and stormed a suspected IPOB/ESN hideout on Cameron Street, Ubahu, in Okigwe Local Government Area.

    “On sighting the operatives, the suspects opened fire, resulting in a gun battle during which three suspects were arrested,” he said.

    Okoye said that the suspects ages were: 21, 31 and 37, noting that two others escaped into the surrounding bushes.

    The spokesman said one AK-47 riffle, two pump-action guns, 18 live cartridges, mobile devices, laptops, and N10.3 million cash were recovered from the scene.

    “Investigations revealed that the money was contributed by IPOB members to finance terrorism,” he said.

    With Easter celebrations in the horizon, Okoye assured Imo residents of robust security across the state.

    Okoye further noted that the command in collaboration with sister agencies, patrol, surveillance, and checkpoints has been intensified to ensure a safe and peaceful celebrations.

    He urged residents to stay vigilant and report any suspicious activity to the nearest police station or via 08034773600.

  • BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu drops lawyer as trial resumes before new judge

    BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu drops lawyer as trial resumes before new judge

    …apologises over attacks on judge, others

    Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), on Friday, tendered an apology over his recent attacks on the Federal High Court and Justice Binta Nyako.

    Kanu, through his new counsel and former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, also apologised to the Federal Government’s lawyer, Chief Awomolo, SAN.

    The IPOB leader equally apologised to his team of lawyers earlier led by Aloy Ejimakor for also attacking them while before Justice Nyako.

    Kanu tendered the apology through his lead counsel, Chief Agabi, before Justice James Omotosho, the new trial judge.

    Upon resumed trial, Agabi sought the court’s permissio to deliver a message on Kanu’s behalf.

    He said he had already discussed the development with the lawyer to the prosecution and Justice Omotosho granted the application.

    Recall Justice Omotosho had fixed March 21 for the trial of Kanu.

    The judge fixed the date after the case file was transferred to him.

    Kanu, who was brought back to the country in June 2021 from Kenya, was expected to take his plea as the case begins afresh (de novo).

    NAN reports that the Chief Judge (CJ) of FHC, Justice John Tsoho, had, in a letter dated March 4 and addressed to Kanu’s lead counsel, Mr Aloy Ejimakor, communicated the re-assignment of the case from Justice Binta Nyako to Justice Omotosho.

    The re-assignment followed the demand by Kanu and his team of lawyers for the transfer of the seven-count terrorism charge to another judge, after alleging bias.

    Justice Nyako, on Sept. 24, 2024, withdrew from the case and sent the case file to the CJ of FHC for re-assignment.

    The judge said she could not proceed with a trial where a defendant lacked confidence in the court.

    However, the CJ sent Kanu’s case file back to Justice Nyako for adjudication, insisting that a formal application must be made by the defence before the recusal could be accepted.

    But Kanu and Ejimakor, on Feb. 10, insisted that Justice Nyako no longer had jurisdiction to preside over the case after her recusal (withdrawal) from the matter, prompting the judge to adjourned the case indefinitely (sine die).

    NAN reports that Justice Ahmed Mohammed (who has been elevated to Appeal Court) and Justice Tsoho (before becoming the CJ) had presided over Kanu’s trial before it was assigned to Justice Nyako, following the defendant’s rejection of the two judges. (NAN)

  • You have no right to prosecute Nnamdi Kanu afresh – Lawyer blasts FG

    You have no right to prosecute Nnamdi Kanu afresh – Lawyer blasts FG

    A human right lawyer, Barr. Christopher Chidera has tackled the Nigerian government over the plan to start the prosecution of the detained leader of Indigenous People of Biafra  (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu afresh (de novo).

    He said any attempt to prosecute the IPOB leader under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 is legally untenable, procedurally flawed, and morally bankrupt.

    The lawyer called on Tinubu’s government to swiftly initiate a peaceful negotiations for a peaceful resolution before midnight on Thursday, 20 March 2025, or down with the consequences of exposing the high profile corruption, system failure, injustice in the Nigeria justice system.

    In a statement made available to journalists at the weekend in Abuja, the human right lawyer noted that Nnamdi Kanu’s case stands as a glaring testament to the fragility of Nigeria’s legal and judicial framework when confronted with the unyielding pursuit of justice and self-determination.

    The statement pointed out that the section of Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 which the prosecution relied on is no longer a written law in force in Nigeria.

    The lawyer added that any attempt to proceed under a repealed statute is tantamount to defying the ancient doctrine of stare decisis, which anchors the certainty and cohesion of justice in common law jurisdictions.

    “Nigeria’s courts lack the substantive jurisdiction to try Kanu under a legal relic, and any attempt to do so constitutes a direct assault on his constitutional rights to a fair hearing and protection from retroactive punishment.

    “The prosecution’s feeble reliance on Section 98(3) of the TPPA 2022—claiming continuity of proceedings—collapses under scrutiny. A de novo trial is a fresh proceeding, not an extension of a defunct case.

    “The government’s legal acrobatics cannot mask this fundamental truth: the procedural jurisdiction to prosecute Kanu under the 2013 Act evaporated with its repeal.

    “To persist is to invite ridicule and condemnation from both Nigerian citizens and the international community.

    “Reports that Mazi Kanu will assume his own defense on 21 March 2025 herald a seismic shift in this saga.

    “Having already forced the recusal of the formidable Justice Binta Nyako—despite institutional resistance—and secured the intervention of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Kanu has demonstrated his capacity to confront what he rightly or wrongly perceives as a biased judicial establishment.

    “Should he represent himself, the prosecution will face a formidable adversary armed not only with legal acumen but with the moral weight of a cause that resonates with millions.

    “The twists and turns: Kanu’s self-representation will ignite legal fireworks, exposing the dirty underbelly of Nigeria’s judiciary—its inconsistencies, its biases, and its susceptibility to political manipulation.

    “The government’s ability to control the narrative will crumble as Kanu commands the courtroom and the court of public opinion.

    “This is no ordinary case. It is the most consequential in Nigeria’s history, a crucible in which the judiciary’s credibility will be tested under unprecedented global scrutiny.

    “Ordinary Nigerians, captivated by this drama, await the unraveling of legal arguments and the revelation of which laws the prosecution will twist to sustain its faltering case.

    “Yet, the truth is inescapable: Nigeria cannot win. Convicting Kanu is a legal impossibility and a political miscalculation of historic proportions.

    “His detention, his suffering, and his endurance for the Biafran cause have galvanized a movement that cannot be criminalized or intimidated into silence,” he stated.

    The statement, therefore, called on Tinubu’s government  to abandon the proposed prosecution and negotiate an amicable resolution with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu before midnight, 20 March 2025 or down with the consequences of exposing the corruption and rot in the Nigerian justice system.

    “Political dissent cannot be extinguished by force, and the Biafran struggle will not be subdued by crackdowns or detention without trial. Kanu’s resolve is unshakable, and his platform on 21 March will amplify a truth the government cannot suppress: Nigeria’s judiciary lacks the authority and legitimacy to try him,” the statement added.

  • Kanu’s family wants FHC Judges sanctioned over court disobedience

    Kanu’s family wants FHC Judges sanctioned over court disobedience

    The family of the detained leader of Indigenous People of Biafra ( IPOB ), Nnamdi Kanu has called for the sanction of the Chief Judge of Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho and Justice Binta Nyako over disobedience to court orders.

    The family said the flagrant disobedience to the valid court order by Justice Tsoho and Justice Binta as presiding judge has brought the judiciary into disrepute.

    In a statement signed by his brother Prince Emmanuel Kanu on behalf of the family on Sunday in Abuja and made available to journalists highlighted key judicial pronouncements from Nigerian courts and international bodies, all of which have ruled in favor of Kanu’s release.

    The statement commended the timely intervention of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun in ensuring that the decade long trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is duly re-assigned to a competent judge devoid of bias.

    The statement read ” Whilst we welcome the timely intervention of the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria in ensuring that the decade long sham trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is duly assigned to a competent judge untainted by bias or one that openly and unashamedly pander to tribal sentiments or exhibit the tendency to succumb to executive manipulation; we find it shocking that it required the involvement of the conscious public and that of the most senior judicial officer in Nigeria for Binta Nyako to obey her own order of recusal she made in her own court.

    “In any sane country that takes adherence to the rule of law seriously, both John Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court and Binta Nyako, the presiding judge that made the recusal order ought to be sanctioned for bringing the judiciary into disrepute.

    “Is it not bizarre that a judge blatantly refused to obey an order of court? A chief judge that sought to set aside a valid court order by way of a phantom memo (written note) and a presiding judge that blatantly refused to honour the order she enrolled in her own court have no business being on the bench.

    “It is even more shocking that some poorly informed, self-appointed defenders of judicial impunity in Nigeria, would dare argue on the pages of newspapers and media interviews that a judge can ignore a valid court order. Shocking!

    “At the heart of this long running saga is the attempt by the state of Nigeria to criminalise self determination which is a right guaranteed by law. If people were to take the time to study the origin of the persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and the travails he continues to face and endure, they would understandably come to the conclusion that what is happening with the illegal and criminal proscription of IPOB in Abuja courts by haters of the Igbo race is not far removed from what transpired prior to the unleashing of the pogrom and genocidal war that claimed 5 million Igbo lives in 1966.

    “The same way 1966 coup was tagged an Igbo coup and used as cover to unleash the Holocaust on the  Biafra nation, is how they aim to use the cover of terrorism (IPOB proscription) to eliminate the youthful populations of the East and jail Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

    “The purveyors of this false narrative that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is the leader of an outlawed group have never asked themselves how come a court of law in the same Abuja found that IPOB is not an unlawful group, only for Abubakar Malami- instead of going on appeal, went to the chambers of his fellow Fulani and hater of the Igbo race in the person of Justice Kafarati to declare IPOB a terrorist organisation without following due process of law as outlined in the constitution of  Nigeria.

    “Today traducers of the self determination of Biafra have latched on to this illegal ex-parte proscription order to charge Mazi Nnamdi Kanu with facilitating terrorism but have completely forgotten that the same Abuja  court ruled that IPOB is not an unlawful group. Selective obedience and disobedience to court orders is the issue facing Nigeria in this case and we must all confront it.

    “This matter has only just begun and by the time this sham trial is  finished, Nigerian judiciary and their injudicious selective justice will be exposed for the world to see. It is inconceivable that the damage the Nigerian judiciary is about to suffer will ever be eradicated from the minds of the populace”.

    The statement added that no society within common law can hope to use an outcome in a civil suit to confer criminal liability on an accused person.

    The family insisted that the  proscription of IPOB upon which the whole  charges are base were made in a civil process without fair hearing, so it cannot fly.

  • Trouble brewing as ACF condemns killing of northern drivers in South East

    Trouble brewing as ACF condemns killing of northern drivers in South East

    Trouble brewing as the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has expressed concern over the attacks on drivers of trucks conveying goods from the North to the South-East by suspected members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

    The ACF cautioned that the killings of the drivers and the destruction of their vehicles constitute a serious threat to national security that could lead to the breakdown of law and order and generalised anarchy.

    This comes as the Department of State Service (DSS) Tuesday, invited Daily Trust reporters in Plateau State over reportage of the protest over the killing of the drivers.

    The media had reported that trucks’ drivers and owners on Sunday, protested in Jos, Plateau State capital, lamenting that many of their members had been killed and their vehicles burnt in the attacks.

    The report stated that more than 20 truck drivers had been killed and many others missing in attacks on them in the South-East in the last one year.

    In a statement on Tuesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Professor Tukur Muhammad-Baba, the ACF said it had observed that drivers of heavy-duty haulage trucks/trailers conveying goods to and from, or merely traversing roads in the South-East had and were still being subjected to what it called vicious and unprovoked attacks, leading to the murder of drivers, burning of vehicles and looting of goods.

    The ACF accused the security agencies and the federal government of doing nothing to tame the attacks.

    “The attacks are being brazenly carried out by the euphemistic gunmen/gun-women who openly claim membership of terror groups such as the so-called Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and Eastern Security Network (ESN), with the attacks directed only on northerners and northern-owned property.

    “The terror merchants have continued to double down on the savage attacks and even posting video clips of the results of their gruesome actions, with gleeful taunts, on social media. Often, the savagery extends to burning of the corpses of hapless victims. Only a few days ago indeed, members of the National Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO) and the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) demonstrated at Jos, the Plateau State Capital, to draw attention to the attacks and the over 50 drivers and about 100 trailers burnt over the last eight years,” it stated.

    The ACF added: “Equally worrisome is the silence of national security agencies and the federal and state governments. ACF asserts that the attacks constitute a serious threat to national security with the potential to lead to the breakdown of law and order and generalised anarchy.

    “Needless to assert, absolutely, no individual or groups should be allowed free rein to visit murder, looting, arson, vandalism and general brigandage on innocent citizens. ACF is gravely saddened by the development and fully supports the contemplation by NARTO and NURTW to boycott the haulage of goods to and from the South-East until the situation is brought under control.

    “ACF further extends condolences to the families and friends of victims of the attacks, calls on the federal and relevant state authorities, as well as the security agencies to step-up to stop the unprovoked and extra-constitutional actions by the terror groups.

    “At the very minimum, perpetrators of the dastardly acts must be fished out and brought to justice. The relevant authorities ought to declare a state of emergency on the matter”.

    The group added: “The ACF further decries the silence or lip service by South-East elite, politically exposed persons and socio-cultural groups on the issue and calls on them to end the lip service and neglect but publicly condemn the barbarism being visited on northerners and northern-owned businesses in the region.”

    It further called on the governments of Enugu and Imo states to pay full compensation for lives and injuries as well as the goods lost to the attacks.

    DSS invites Daily Trust’s reporters over story

    The Department of State Services (DSS), Jos office on Tuesday interrogated two reporters covering Plateau State, Ado Abubakar Musa and Dickson S. Adama, over the newspaper’s Monday lead story.

    The reporters were invited through Ayuku Pwaspo, Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Plateau State Council, but no reason was initially given for the summon.

    Upon arrival at the DSS office at 11am, an officer escorted them to the Deputy Director’s office, where they were informed that their invitation was related to the story titled “Protest in Jos over killing of truck drivers in S/East”.

    According to the DSS officers, the report was disturbing and written in bad faith, particularly criticising the use of the word ‘protest’ in the headline and the accompanying images.

    The reporters defended the article, explaining that other media outlets also reported the incident, which was based on the grievances of truck drivers.

    They also explained the term ‘protest’ has various meanings in media parlance, and its usage was editorially justified.

    The DSS officers revealed that the report had drawn reactions from Abuja, the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA), and other parts of the country, prompting them to manage the situation carefully.

    During the question-and-answer session, the officers initially stated that one of the newspaper’s reporters would be detained and taken to Abuja the next day while the other should report back to the the media headquarters in Abuja.

    However, the reporters were later taken to the director’s office, where he reiterated dissatisfaction with the report, advising journalists to consider that some media terms may be misinterpreted by the public.

    The director confirmed that one of the reporters, Ado, would be taken to Abuja for further explanations, but first, had to write a statement regarding the report.

    After completing their statements and providing their names and phone numbers, the reporters were released around 3pm.

    The DSS director said the reporters would be invited again for questioning if necessary.

  • Ex-Imo Attorney-General seeks Kanu’s release

    Ex-Imo Attorney-General seeks Kanu’s release

    Mr  Chukwuma-Machukwu Ume, SAN, a former Attorney-General (A-G) and Commissioner for Justice of Imo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to intervene in the ongoing trial of Nnamdi Kanu, Leader of the  proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

    Ume, who called for political solution in the matter, urged President Tinubu to use his good office towards Kanu’s release as part of the efforts to restore peace in the south east.

    The senior lawyer made the appeal in an open letter to the president, titled: “Healing the Wounds in our Nation-Building Efforts and Matching Nigeria towards a New Sustainable Nation” on Saturday in Abuja.

    Ume, who is also a Rapporteur, Victims of Persecution, said that the early release of Kanu would not be a sign of weakness, but a demonstration of political wisdom and statesmanship.

    He drew the attention of the president to Kanu’s travails dating back to Oct. 14, 2015, when he was arrested by operatives of the Department of Security Service (DSS) over alleged terrorism-related allegations to when he was arraigned in court on Oct. 23, 2015.

    He lamented that the IPOB leader was fast becoming a prisoner of conscience.

    Ume advocated for the early release of Kanu, adding that doing so would not only de-escalate tensions in the region but also presents him an opportunity to turn a new.

    The letter further drew the attention of President Tinubu to similar agitations in other parts of the country, notably in the South West and Niger Delta, where the government had exercised wonderful discretion to de-escalate tensions and promote dialogue.

    Parts of the letter reads: “Your Excellency, I believe that a political, peaceful and reconciliatory approach will serve the country better and provide a robust steps towards healing national wounds, restoring economic stability, and reaffirming our commitment to unity in diversity.

    “Your Excellency, the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will not be a sign of weakness, but a demonstration of political wisdom and statesmanship.

    “It presents an opportunity to turn a new page in Nigeria’s history -one that priorities peace, justice, and the collective well-being of all citizens.

    “His evolving perspectives, shaped by time and reflection, can be harnessed as a valuable resource in our journey towards a more unified and prosperous nation.”

    Ume appealed to the president to “reflect on the pleas of our late sages -Chief Mbazurike Amaechi; Prof. George Achulike Obiozo, Dr Chukwuemeka Ezeife, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyawu; Chief Ayo Adebanjo and Chief Edwin Clerk, who spent their final years advocating for peace, unity, national healing and requesting for his release.”