Tag: judges

  • Call appeal court Judges to order, group urges Tinubu

    Call appeal court Judges to order, group urges Tinubu

    The Arewa Christians and Indigenous Pastors Association (ACIPA), has called on President Bola Tinubu to call the Judges of the Court of Appeal to order over what it described as ”controversial judgments” recently delivered on some elections across the nation.

    Chairman of the group, Rev. Luke Shehu, made the call in a statement on Sunday in Jos.

    He said that the judgments were becoming “a national disgrace”.

    Shehu stated that recent appeal court judgments that sacked some members of the national assembly from Plateau were a ”miscarriage of justice”

    He insisted that the president must intervene in order to restore public confidence in the judiciary “and democracy in general”.

    ”We wish to use this medium to call on President Bola Tinubu to call our judges to order; they need to be reminded that the judiciary is still the last hope of the common man.

    ”We also wish to remind our president that the international community is watching while the judiciary is making pronouncements that appear to make a mockery of the process of justice and democracy.

    ”The votes of millions of Nigerians cannot be thrown away using legal semantics or technicalities.

    ”Some judicial decisions by some election petition tribunals and appeal courts judges are unacceptable and need to be stopped now.”

    Shehu also called on the National Judicial Council (NJC) to review the recent appeal court judgments on Plateau elections toward ensuring that the right thing is done.

    He further called on residents of Plateau to unite, devoid of religious and ethnic affiliations, toward the growth and development of the state, adding that only a united force could fight together.

    The chairman advised religious leaders to pay attention to building good morals in society, rather than delving into politics and hiding under the guise of spirituality.

  • Federal high court judges adjourn abruptly over news of death of colleague

    Federal high court judges adjourn abruptly over news of death of colleague

    Proceedings at the Federal High Court in Lagos, were on Monday, halted abruptly, following notice of the demise of a brother judge, Hon. Justice Fatun Odohi Riman.

    The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Hon. Justice John Tsoho, had announced the death of Justice Riman, who sits at the Awka division of the court.

    In the notice to all Federal High Court judges dated Oct. 28, Tsoho stated that Justice Riman passed away in England in the early hours of Oct. 28.

    According to the notification, the late judge had been admitted to a hospital in England, before his demise.

    He said that further burial information will be subsequently, communicated by his family.

    On Monday, some judges of the Lagos division who had commenced sittings for the day were made to rise abruptly, following the notice.

    Cases have consequently, been adjourned to later dates.

  • TAC deploys two Nigerian Judges to Gambia

    TAC deploys two Nigerian Judges to Gambia

    The Directorate of Technical Aid Corps (DTAC), has deployed two Justices of the Federation to The Gambia to assist the West African nation’s quest for effective judicial service delivery.

    It was learnt  that the two officers were formally briefed on their new task at the directorate’s headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday.

    Dr Yusuf Yakub, the Director-General of the corps, in a brief remark, said that the two Justices – Ruqayat Ayoola and Muhammad Owolabi – were nominated by the Chief Justice of the Federation.

    He described the Judges as “some of our best from the Judiciary”.

    Yakub reminded the duo that DTAC was established in 1987 to serve as an instrument for soft power diplomacy in Africa, Caribbean and Pacific nations.

    “It has, since then, been deploying volunteers to 35 countries.

    “We have covered up to 35 countries from inception; currently, we have volunteers in 10 countries and have extended our mandate beyond bilateral relationships.

    “We have also gone triangular; we have partnerships with other international organisations and have volunteers with the United Nation Development Programme (UNDP) serving in New York.

    “Also, as part of our repositioning drive to meet up with the 4-D Foreign Policy initiatives of President Bola Tinubu, we have extended our tentacles to others countries outside Africa, Caribbean and the Pacific,” he added.

    He urged the Judges to serve with dignity when they get to Gambia.

    Responding, Justice Owolabi thanked the directorate for the opportunity and promised to make Nigeria proud in Gambia.

  • NJC nominates 23 Federal High Court Judges for appointment [SEE FULL LIST]

    NJC nominates 23 Federal High Court Judges for appointment [SEE FULL LIST]

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) on Friday recommended 23 nominees  for appointment as Judges of the Federal High Court (FHC) of Nigeria.

    Mr Soji Oye, the Director of Information of the Council disclosed this on Friday in Abuja.

    The recommendation for the appointments was made at the 103th  meeting of the Council presided over by the (CJN) Justice Olukayode Ariwoola and held in Abuja.

    Aside from the 23 nominees for the Federal High Court, the NJC also sought the appointment of one Kadi for Kaduna State and four other Kadis for Kano State Sharia Court of Appeal.

    Those recommended as Federal High Court Judges are Ekerete Udofot Akpan, Hussaini Dadan-Garba, Egbe Raphael Joshua, Anyalewa Onoja-Alapa, Aishatu Auta Ibrahim, Ogazi Friday Nkemakonam, Ogundare Kehinde Olayiwola, Onah Chigozie Sergius, Hauwa Buhari, Ibrahim Ahmad Kala and Hauwa Joeph Yilwa.

    Others are Amina Aliyu Mohammed,Sharon Tanko Ishaya,  Chituru Joy Wigwe-Oreh,
    Musa Kakaki, Owoeye Alexander Oluseyi, Abiodun Jordan Adeyemi, Agbaje Olufunmilola Adetutu and Salim Olasupo Ibrahim.

    The rest are Dipeolu Deinde Isaac, Ariwoola Olukayode Jnr, Abdullahi Muhammad Dan-Ige and Mashkur Salisu.

    The NJC noted that Hon Kadi Muhammad Aminu Danjuma is to be appointed as Grand Kadi for Kaduna State.

    Others to be appointed as Kadis for Kano State Sharia courts are Muhammad Adam Kadem, Salisu Muhammad Isa, Isa Idris Sa’id and Aliyu Muhammad Kani.

    The council also recommended candidates are expected to be sworn-in after the approval of the NJC’S recommendations to the President and their respective State Governors and confirmation by their State Houses of Assembly as the case may be.

  • Discharge justice with integrity – Oborevwori charges judges

    Discharge justice with integrity – Oborevwori charges judges

    Delta State Governor, Rt. Hon. Sheriff Oborevwori on Thursday called on Judges in the country to be guided by the doctrine of fair hearing, equity and good conscience in the discharge of their duties.

    Oborevwori urged Judges to guarantee justice for all by maintaining a high level of personal probity, devoid of greed and ensuring that the guilty are punished according the provisions of the law.

    He gave the charge at the swearing-in of Justice Catherine Ojugbana-Orishedere as President Customary Court of Appeal, and seven Judges of the State Judiciary on Thursday in Asaba.

    Those sworn-in as Judges of the High Court include; Aforkeya Obomejero; Okeleke Ifeanyi Samuel; Umuko Aboyowa Godwin; Ossai Ngozi Rita; and Adolor Onorieukuhakpo Sunny.

    While Gbakeji Emakpor Michael and Uraih Ifeanyi Tracy Patricia were sworn-in as Judges of the Customary Court of Appeal.

    Governor Oborevwori said that Justice Ojugbana-Orishedere’s recommendation by the National Judicial Council, appointment, and subsequent confirmation by the State House of Assembly testified to her capacity, competence, and fitness for the office.

    The Governor remarked that her elevation to the position of PCCA after 23 years of service validates her credentials as an eminent jurist and faithful public servant.

    Oborevwori said; “to the PCCA and the new Judges, I charge you to continue in the same spirit of hard work, sincerity, dedication, consistency, and excellence that earned you this elevation.

    “I expect you to discharge the duties of your office without fear or favour. It is one thing for judgement to be passed; it is quite another thing for justice to be seen to be served.

    “Justice is served when it is anchored on the timeless values of fair hearing, equity, good conscience, common sense, and the guilty are punished. Your offices require that you maintain a high level of personal probity, devoid of greed.

    “Given your antecedents, I have no doubt that you will justify the confidence that has been reposed in you with this appointment.

    “It is therefore incumbent on you to be good role models to your subordinates, peers, and professional colleagues. You must endeavour to leave a legacy of courage, integrity, and righteousness,” Oborevwori added.

    Responding on behalf of the Judges, Justice Ojugbana-Orishedere, thanked Governor Oborevwori for finding them worthy to serve in the state judiciary.

    She pledged the commitment of the judges to the discharge of their duties as enshrined in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The ceremony was witnessed by the state Deputy Governor, Sir Monday Onyeme, Chief Judge of Delta State Justice Theresa Diai; Deputy Speaker of the State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Arthur Akpowowo; former Chief Judges of the State, Justice Roseline

  • Nasarawa Govt to sack Judges without Law degrees

    Nasarawa Govt to sack Judges without Law degrees

    The Nasarawa State House of Assembly has advised Area Court Judges without Law degrees to obtain the requisite qualification within 10 years of employment or risk expulsion from the bench.

    Alhaji Ibrahim Abdullahi, the Speaker, Nasarawa State House Assembly, made this known at preliminary in Lafia.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Abdullahi said this when the house was deliberating on report of its standing Committee on Judiciary, Ethics and Previlidges on a Bill For a Law to Amend the Nasarawa State Area Courts Law 2022 and For Other Matters Related Therewith.

    “Going by the principal law, if it is to be implemented it will lay off some staff of the Judiciary, for fear of this, hence the need to amend the principal law.

    “The principal law provides that for one to be a judge of the Upper Area Court one must be a legal practitioner with at least four years post call.

    “And for one to be a judge of an Area Court you must be a legal practitioner with at least three years post call.

    “The Committee is of strong recommendation that a window period of 10 years to be granted to the affected staff to enroll into a degree programme of Law in order to be called to bar for them to fit in,” he said.

    The speaker then slated May 9 for the third reading of the bill.

    Alhaji Tanko Tunga, the Majority Leader of the House, moved a motion for the adoption of the report of the bill, while Mr. Abel Bala seconded the motion.

    The House unanimously adopted the report.

  • Ugboma: Judges, lawyers shun court proceedings as strike commences in Imo

    Ugboma: Judges, lawyers shun court proceedings as strike commences in Imo

    Lawyers and judges in Imo State on Monday commenced a three-day strike over the killing of the magistrate in charge of Ejemekwuru Customary Court in Oguta Local Government Area of the state, Nnaemeka Ugboma.

    Ugboma was on Thursday afternoon shot dead by fleeing gunmen while presiding over a session in court.

    In a bid to express their anger over the magistrate’s killing, the five branches of the Nigerian Bar Association in the state on Monday embarked on a strike.

    In Owerri, it was observed on Monday that no court at the State High Court at new Owerri nor the Magistrate Court at Orlu road was sitting.

    The judges too did not come to court as the premises became shadows of themselves.

    The NBA chairman in Owerri, Ugochukwu Allinor, said the measure was being taken to urge government to apprehend the killers of the magistrate and for the courts to be adequately protected.

    “This dastardly act is highly condemnable as it desecrates the temple of justice and undermines the confidence of the citizens in the judiciary as the last hope of the common man.

    The Bar therefore calls on the Imo State Government to provide, with immediate effect, security in and around all the courts in Imo State, which have remained porous despite the sensitive role they play in the society.

    “The Imo Bar, in consonance with the national body of the NBA, ably led by Y.C. Maikyau, SAN, firmly resists the attempt to undermine the judiciary and the legal profession, and instill fear in the conduct of judicial proceedings. Also, citizens need to be aware that judicial officers and lawyers are not their enemies or opponents, they only aid in the administration of justice.
    In the circumstance, the members of the NBA in Imo State have resolved to boycott all courts in Imo State starting from Monday, February 6, 2023 to Wednesday February 8, 2023, in other to register their displeasure with the current state of affairs.

    Until the members of the Bar in Imo State are sufficiently assured of the safety of the judiciary, the Bar and the litigants as requested, we shall continue to review the situation and to take further necessary actions.”

  • Hurrah! The judges awaken, the powerful are becoming convicts – By Owei Lakemfa

    IT is against the run of play for the powerful in office to be convicted for misdeeds, especially in a reign of virtual lawlessness and impunity. But it happened thrice in the past five weeks with the courts convicting for contempt of the Chairman of the powerful Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Abdulrasheed Bawa; the Inspector General of Police, IGP, Usman Alkali Baba and the Chief of the entire Nigeria Army, Lieutenant General Farouk Yahaya.

    Who knows, we may end the year with the wife of the President, Mrs Aisha Buhari, being hauled before a judge for the alleged abduction, torture and illegal detention of a student, Aminu Muhammad Adamu who allegedly insulted Her Excellency, an unelected official of the Federal Republic.

    To comprehend what appears to be the radical rumbling in the judiciary is to cast our minds back to its near silencing for a cumulative 29 years by ‘Fellow Nigerians’ in camouflage uniform who ousted the jurisdiction of the courts.

    The military regimes declared themselves supreme and even called their gang, the ‘Supreme Military Council’ which was above the law and the people.

    Tragically, some judges not only saw themselves as slaves of the military but indeed acted as such. I recall two of these men in the temple of justice. One was as handsome as Lucifer. On matters the military retroactively decreed death, he would joke through the proceedings and allocutus.

    The second judge, who we journalists called ‘Olupani’, was ever enthusiastic to send people, especially journalists to prison in his eagerness to demonstrate to the soldiers in power that he is loyal to them. The height of his sycophancy was when he pronounced from the bench that the leader of the junta was “Kabiyesi”, the Yoruba word for a supreme being who is next only to the gods and whose deeds or misdeeds can neither be examined nor questioned by any earthly being.

    It was in that castrated state that the country transited to civil rule and the judiciary, while still suffering from the trauma of military misrule, showed signs of recovery.

    Things went quite bad again when retired General Muhammadu Buhari became President in 2015. To put the judiciary in place and remind it of the enormous powers of the Presidency, his government in 2016, carried out Gestapo-like midnight raids across the country on the homes of senior judges, including those of the Supreme Court. The security agents smashed doors, caused bodily injuries and terrified the judges, their families and aides.

    When one of the victims, Justice Walter Onnoghen became the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, the scars were still visible. He was soon harassed using a tribunal and then shoved aside for the appointment of a lacklustre CJN who seemed lost and only found himself after he threw in the towel in expected controversial circumstances.

    There are two hypothesis I have why the same judiciary, whose apex arm only on January 14, 2020 imposed an unelected governor – who came fourth in the Imo State Governorship elections- on the electorate, would find the courage to make the judicial pronouncements of the past five weeks. It is either the judges are waking up, or with age, and the fact that his government has less than six months left, President Buhari is losing his iron grip on power, and our suffocating country is beginning to breathe easier.

    Whatever the case, the realisation that the courts can enquire into any matter, and hopefully bring anybody to book, is psychologically uplifting.

    The current path was taken when on October 28, a Federal Capital Territory High Court presided over by Justice Chizoba Oji decided on the failure of the EFCC to comply with a court order instructing it to return a Range Rover and the sum of N40 million to an applicant, Rufus Adeniyi Ojuawo, a retired Air Vice Marshal.

    The judge ruled that: “Having continued willfully in disobedience to the order of this court, he (EFCC Chairman) should be committed to prison at Kuje Correctional Centre for his disobedience, and continued disobedience of the said order of court made on November 21st, 2018, until he purges himself of the contempt.”

    Although the judge set aside her order on November 10 when the EFCC Chair showed he had partially complied with the court order and was in the process of carrying out a full compliance, the case boosted the morale of not a few.

    The more earth-shaking case was the November 29 conviction of the chief law enforcement officer of the country, IGP Baba by the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, to three months in prison for disobeying a court order. The court also ordered the police to pay the applicant N10 million as special and general damages.

    Justice Mobolaji Olajuwon ordered that the IGP should be committed to prison for three months until he obeyed an order the court made eleven years ago. She further ordered that: “If at the end of the three months, the contemnor remains recalcitrant and still refuses to purge his contempt, he shall be committed for another period and until he purges his contempt.”

    The case involved a police officer, Mr. Patrick Okoli, who was unlawfully and compulsorily retired from the Nigeria Police Force, NPF, in 1992. Although the Police Service Commission, PSC, recommended Okoli’s reinstatement into the Police, in compliance with a judgement of a High Court in Bauchi State delivered since February 9, 1994, the IGP refused to comply.

    A follow up judgement by Justice Donatus Okorowo of the Federal High Court, on October 21, 2011, ordering the IGP to comply with directive of the PSC was also ignored. Not unexpectedly, the IGP would neither exchange his beautiful uniform for those of a prisoner nor would he, unlike Bawa, readily comply. His reasons include that Citizen Okoli’s service-file could not be traced in the Police database and that in any case he is not aware of any court order!

    To cap these judicial goals with a hat-trick, Justice Halima Abdulmalik of the High Court Minna, ordered the arrest and imprisonment of the Nigerian Army Chief of Staff, General Farouk Yahaya and the Commander Training and Doctrine Command, TRADOC, Major General Olugbenga Olabanji “until they purge themselves of the contempt”. Although there is no power I know that would remove the red caps of the generals and replace their beautiful uniforms with those of prisoners, it is instructive that officially, these are convicts.

    Nigerians meanwhile await the case of Mrs Buhari who, with reference to an incident involving Buhari’s nephew, Sabiu Tunde Yusuf in 2020 and a clash with Ms Fatimah Daura in the Presidential Villa, has a record of impunity.

    One day the rule of law and social justice will prevail.

  • Trouble for 15 High Court Judges as NJC probes misconduct

    Trouble for 15 High Court Judges as NJC probes misconduct

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has set up high-powered probe panels to investigate alleged gross misconduct allegations brought against 15 Judges of the Federal and State High Courts.

    The probe panels are to determine the culpability of the Judges in the various petitions filed against them by individuals and corporate bodies.

    A statement by the NJC issued by Director of Information, Mr Soji Oye on Friday in Abuja confirmed that the decision to investigate the alleged erring Judges was taken at the Council’s 99th meeting presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola.

    The decision, the NJC said,  is sequel to the submission of recommendations of three Preliminary Complaint Assessment Committees which considered 66 petitions forwarded to them by the Council from all over the Federation.

    However, the NJC did not name Judges to be probed, their divisions and specific nature of their alleged offences.

    It however revealed that the Council dismissed petitions against 51 Judicial Officers of the Federal and State High Courts for either lack of merit, being subjudice, or being matters for appeal or that the concerned Judge have retired from Service.

    The statement explained that the Council was formally presented with the reviewed Judicial Information Technology Policy which established the general requirements and responsibilities for the Nigerian Judiciary systems and information.

    “The policy provides for guidance of Courts and Judicial Bodies in protecting Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (CIA) of judiciary function and process.

    ”It also stipulates guidance for acceptable use of system, services and technologies as well as provisions for secure storage of judicial data and recovery processes in the event of emergencies or distress.

    “Similarly, It further provides guidelines and incident management policies including Data Centre deployment and use policies.

    “The Scope is intended for all Courts and Judicial Bodies in Nigeria including staff of the Nigerian judiciary, employed or contracted to any Judicial Body handling information that is generated, received, stored, transmitted, or printed.

    “It encompasses all personal or Judiciary identifiable data held in their Courts and Judicial Bodies’ systems and process including supporting mechanisms and technologies for managing such data at rest or in transit.

    “All staff are expected to comply with the policy and associated standard protocols and procedures that have been put in place to support the document.

    “The policy is applicable to all Courts unit, departments of all Judicial Bodies in the Nigerian Judiciary.

    “Council noted appointments of Judicial Officers recommended for appointment at the last meeting who have been sworn –in as Judges of Federal and State High Courts.

    “Reports from Standing and ad-hoc Committees of the Council were also presented at the Meeting as well as notifications of retirement of 16 Judges  and notification of death of a Judge from the Federal and State High Courts”, the NJC said.

  • Nnamdi Kanu: Appeal Court clears air on Transfer of 21 Judges

    Nnamdi Kanu: Appeal Court clears air on Transfer of 21 Judges

    The Court of Appeal says the transfer of 21 justices to various divisions has nothing to do with the judgment of the court that discharged and quashed the terrorism charges against the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

    Contrary to some media reports, the appellate court said that the postings of 21 out of its 81 justices was a routine exercise aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery of the court.

    This is contained in a statement by the Chief Registrar of the Court, Malam Umar Bangari.

    The appellate court said the three justices who delivered the Oct. 13 judgment that ordered the release of Kanu from detention were not transferred.

    Bangaru said that only one justice out of the three that handled Kanu’s matter was affected by the transfer.

    “The attention of the Court of Appeal has been drawn to a publication in the media on  Oct. 24 with a caption “Nnamdi Kanu: 3 Justices on Appeal Court Panel Transferred.

    “The publication in question conveyed the innuendo to the effect that the recent posting of justices of the Court of Appeal was in connection with or in response to the judgment of the Court of  Oct.13  in Nnamdi Kanu versus the Federal Government.

    “We wish to state categorically that the general posting of the justices of the Court of Appeal under reference was routine and aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery system of the court.

    “In fact, 21 out of 81 justices including 6 presiding justices of the court were affected by the general postings.

    “It is therefore incorrect to insinuate that the justices who delivered the judgment in the Nnamdi Kanu appeal were the target of the routine posting exercise.”

    The chief registrar said that the court had an open door policy of providing easy access to the media to make inquiries and seek clarification on any matter of interest to the media for the benefit of the general public.