Tag: Judiciary

  • Odili: Raid on second most senior Supreme Court Justice’s residence is ‘executive infraction’ targeted against judiciary – SANs

    Odili: Raid on second most senior Supreme Court Justice’s residence is ‘executive infraction’ targeted against judiciary – SANs

    Some senior lawyers from the South East region have condemned the raid on a justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Mary Odili, by some security operatives.

    In a statement on Saturday, the legal practitioners described the attack, said to have been carried out on Friday, as an attempt to intimidate the judiciary.

    “Concerned Senior Advocates of Nigeria of South-eastern Extraction condemn in strong terms the unlawful raid on October 29, 2021, of the residence of Hon Justice Mary Peter Odili, the second most senior Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria,” they said in the communique signed by three of the senior advocates, Professor Ilochi Okafor, Mr Etigwe Uwa, and Mr Chijioke Okoli.

    ”The raid said to have been orchestrated by some security agencies, is yet another frontal attack on the independence and integrity of the Judiciary. We are worried that this event is part of a series of events aimed at systematically intimidating and emasculating the Judiciary.

    “We recall similar raids by the EFCC, the DSS and other security operatives on the premises of Justices of the Supreme Court in 2016, and residence of some Judges of the Federal High Court, in Abuja. Despite these security agencies publicly stating the raids were on mistaken identity of the premises, no one has been arrested and prosecuted for such brash criminal attack on the judiciary.”

    The senior advocates stated that one of such raids took place in a courtroom at the Federal High Court while a judge was sitting.

    According to them, consistent attacks on the judiciary are clearly in breach of the constitutional protection of judges and the judiciary.

    “In particular, Section 158 and Paragraph 21 Part 1 of the Third Schedule of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 clearly empower the National Judicial Council with the responsibility to handle all complaints and matters relating to judicial officers.

    “This position of the law has been confirmed in the case of NGANJIWA V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2018) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1609) 301 where the Court of Appeal stated that ‘If any judicial officer commits professional misconduct within the scope of his duty and is investigated, arrested and subsequently prosecuted by security agents, without a formal complaint/report to the NJC, it will be a usurpation of the latter’s constitutionally guaranteed powers under Section 158 and Paragraph 21 Part 1 of the Third Schedule, thereby inhibiting the NJC from carrying out its disciplinary control over erring judicial officers as clearly provided by the Constitution. … it is only when the NJC has given a verdict and handed over such judicial officer (removing his toga of judicial powers) to the prosecuting authority that he may be investigated and prosecuted by the appropriate security agencies’; we re-emphasis that it amounts to an executive infraction on the judicial independence to continue to harass, intimidate and humiliate judges.”

    In view of the doctrine of the independence of the judiciary, the senior lawyers stressed that no security agency or prosecuting authority has the power to investigate, arrest, or prosecute a sitting judicial officer without first referring the matter to the NJC, and await the directive of the Council.

    They, therefore, called on President Muhammadu Buhari to direct investigation of all security agents and others who played any role in the raid and ensure those found culpable were made to face the full wrath of the law.

  • Why I will not enact bill for financial autonomy of judiciary in Rivers – Gov Wike

    Why I will not enact bill for financial autonomy of judiciary in Rivers – Gov Wike

    Governor Nyesom Ezenwo Wike has said the Rivers State government will not enact a bill for the financial autonomy of the State judiciary.

    Governor Wike maintained that it will be futile to bother the State Assembly with such a bill since the 1999 constitution as amended already recognises independence of the judiciary.

    Governor Wike made this assertion at the dinner in honour of delegates to the 61st annual conference of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, held at the banquet hall, Government House, Port Harcourt on Monday night.

    The Governor noted that since Nigeria does not practice unitary system of government, it would be wrong for the Federal Government to issue directives to States on how they should run their affairs.

    “Nobody can force me on how my State will operate. Nobody can say send this bill to the legislature for judiciary autonomy. The constitution has already guaranteed that the judiciary must be independent and we have agreed on that.

    “Amendment had been done that the judiciary must be independent, and on first line charge. If I’m not obeying that, there is a sanction for it,” Wike said.

    The Governor explained that the State Government had released all 2021 capital expenditure due to the judiciary since September. He challenged the Federal Government to prove it has done same.

    Governor Wike urged the Federal Government to desist from playing to the gallery with the issue of financial autonomy for the judiciary.

    According to him, a Federal Government with decrepit High Court buildings across the country cannot truly claim it fully supports financial autonomy for the judiciary.

    “Are they giving the judiciary at the federal level the budget they are supposed to have in order to put the courts in order.”

    Governor Wike warned that the Rivers State government will resist any attempt by the Federal Government to deduct funds meant for the State under the guise of implementing financial autonomy for the judiciary.

    The Governor said the NBA cannot continue to be docile while security agencies are used by the Federal Government to intimidate and harass judges. According to him, “when the judiciary is destroyed, the legal profession is gone.”

    Governor Wike, also took a swipe at the past leadership of NBA for not protesting against the closure of courts in Rivers State for almost two years by the Governor Chibuike Amaechi led administration.

    He used the occasion to eulogise the Chairman of Council of Legal Education, Nigerian Law School, Emeka Ngige (SAN) for endorsing the establishment of the Port Harcourt campus of the Nigerian Law School.

    The Speaker, Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Ikuinyi Owaji-Ibani, charged the NBA to all time stand in defence of the interest of people of the country.

    The President, Nigerian Bar Association, Olumide Akpata, SAN, commended Governor Wike for his unflinching support for the judiciary and the Bar.

    Akpata said Governor Wike’s conscientious support and defence of the judiciary is a pointer to his firm belief that institution of State should be strengthened.

    The NBA President stated that when Governor Wike leaves office, posterity will remember him as a man who fervently contributed his quota to nation building.

    Chairman, Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria in Rivers State and former NBA President, Onueze C.J Okocha lauded Governor Wike for his numerous landmark achievements in office.

  • Nigerian Democracy on the march, judiciary on right path; Anambra Government lauds S’Court verdict affirming Oye as APGA chair, Soludo as flag bearer

    Nigerian Democracy on the march, judiciary on right path; Anambra Government lauds S’Court verdict affirming Oye as APGA chair, Soludo as flag bearer

    The Anambra State Government has hailed the Supreme Court judgement affirming Victor Oye as the authentic National Chairman of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and Charles Soludo as the party’s flag bearer in the forthcoming governorship election in the state.

    Reacting to the verdict which was delivered yesterday, the Commissioner for Information C. Don Adinuba in a statement signed and released on behalf of the Anambra State Government said the Supreme Court has once again demonstrated that it is the temple of justice.

    Read full statement below:

    Anambra Welcomes Supreme Court Verdict On APGA Leadership

    1. The people and Government of Anambra State have received with joy, like the rest of Nigeria, the Supreme Court judgment this morning upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal sitting in Kano that Chief Victor Oye is the authentic National Chairman of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA). He is, therefore, the right and proper person to submit the name of the APGA candidate in the November 6 gubernatorial election in Anambra State to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). His submission of the name of the former Central Bank governor, Professor Chukwuma Charles Soludo, to INEC as the APGA candidate in the forthcoming election following the Anambra State Congress of the party held on June 23, 2021, which Professor Soludo won overwhelmingly in a peaceful and transparent manner, was in accordance with the extant laws of the land.

    2. The Supreme Court has, once again, demonstrated that the Nigerian judiciary is a temple of justice. It does not just give judgments but also dispenses justice. It does not just comply with the letter of the law but also acts in accordance with the spirit of the law. It provides hope for not just the common man but also all citizens, regardless of class, gender, ethnicity or faith.

    3. There is massive rejoicing throughout Anambra State and, indeed, all over Nigeria at the Supreme Court judgment. The people feel justice has been done. The Supreme Court justices have met the expectations and wishes of the people. In other words, public confidence in the judiciary has been restored, despite the activities of a few members of the Bench like Mr Justice Musa Ubale of the Jigawa State High Court at Birnin Kudu who last June 30 gave a preposterous judgment over the APGA leadership by assuming territorial jurisdiction over a development which happened in Awka, Anambra State. It was a new low for the country’s judiciary.

    4. The Supreme Court should not stop at providing the right judgments on cases but punish members of both the Bar who bring to courts matters meant to ridicule the judiciary and of the Bench who entertain such suits and pass judgments on them. The Honorable Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme of the Court of Appeal in Awka served as the conscience of the nation when she in the open court on Tuesday, August 3, excoriated such legal professionals who run helter-skelter from one court to another in Birnin Kudu and Owerri as well as Enugu in what lawyers call forum shopping. The Section on Public Interest and Development Law of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), led by Dr Monday Ubani, also lived up to its reputation as the conscience of our society when it criticized such lawyers, particularly senior lawyers among them, whose conduct brings their profession to public odium. The NBA led by Olumide Akpata also rose to the challenge of the day by not only criticizing such members of the Bar and Bench but also setting up a panel to look into their behavior.

    5. Nigerian democracy is on the march. And the judiciary is on the right path. God bless Nigeria.

     

    Signed

     

    C. Don Adinuba

     

    Commissioner for Information & Public Enlightenment.

  • Wike’s ‘love’ for free polls, legislature, judiciary – Ehichioya Ezomon

    Wike’s ‘love’ for free polls, legislature, judiciary – Ehichioya Ezomon

    By Ehichioya Ezomon
    “Wonders shall never end!” is an apt description of Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike’s newfound love for free, fair, and credible elections, and an independent legislature, and judiciary.
    Yet, Wike is the antithesis of what he’s preaching, after about eight years of doing the unimaginable to undermine the electoral process, freedom of the legislature and independence of the judiciary.
    In all practical purposes, he’s one of Nigeria’s chief enablers of electoral malfeasance, emasculators of the legislature, entanglers of the judiciary, and perverters of the rule of law.
    And Wike deserves a trophy as a political actor to publicly rubbish the credibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) since democracy returned in Nigeria in 1999.
    For the record, Wike accusingly corruptly influenced INEC officials with hundreds of millions of Naira, to manipulate the 2019 elections in Rivers State, to favour him and his political platform, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
    During the bribe-for-vote drama, Wike reportedly urged INEC officials, who couldn’t “deliver”, to refund their largesse. And those that delivered have been sanctioned by INEC, or prosecuted and/or made to forfeit the bribe-money and/or property therefrom.
    How did Wike thrust onto the scene and acquire power and influence to become the most formidable voice of the opposition since 2015 when he’s elected as governor of Rivers?
    A product of the political family of former Governor Peter Odili (1999-2007), along with the Minister of Transportation and former Governor Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi (2007-2015), Wike started off as Chairman of Obiokpor Local Government Area of Rivers.
    He graduated from Chief of Staff to Amaechi, to Minister of State (Education), contested for governor in 2015, and got re-elected in 2019, with those polls defining his portraiture in today’s polity.
    Wike began his solid political forays when Amaechi, as Chair of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF), won re-election on May 24, 2013, but was de-recognised by then President Goodluck Jonathan.
    Jonathan, allegedly fighting his wife, Dame Patience Jonathan’s proxy war with Amaechi in Rivers, upheld Plateau State Governor Jonah Jang, who lost the NGF poll to Amaechi by 19 votes to 16 votes – in a scenario derisively dubbed “16 is greater than 19”.
    Having wormed his way into Mrs Jonathan’s heart, Wike was armed with the instruments of “federal might” to practically cage Amaechi, and disorganise the smooth running of his government.
    There’re untoward events in Rivers; three suffice here: * Security operatives blocked access to Government House, Port Harcourt, preventing Amaechi from going out or coming in for several days.
    * In mid July 2013, four PDP governors (Babangida Aliyu (Niger State), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa), Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano), and Sule Lamido (Jigawa), visiting Rivers in solidarity with Amaechi, were stoned at the airport by members of Grassroots Development Initiative (GDI), a group formed by Wike for the 2015 polls.
    * Prior, the streets of Port Harcourt became a battlefield for days, following failed attempts by five members to take control of the House of Assembly dominated by 27 pro-Amaechi members.
    As reported by Vanguard on July 11, 2013, as the GDI-led group drove pro-Amaechi members into Government House, policemen in pursuit “fired teargas canisters into the seat of power, “peppering government officials holed inside the complex,” while street chaos “forced banks, the state secretariat and judiciary to close shops.”
    The Rivers fracas drew the ire of the National Assembly, with the House of Representatives calling for sack of the partisan Police Commissioner Joseph Mbu, who repeatedly declared himself as the “de facto Governor of Rivers” in defiance of Governor Amaechi.
    It’s no surprise the 2015 polls in Rivers recorded many deaths, with some victims decapitated, and doubtful millions of votes amid a balloting apathy for fear of political thugs ready to spill blood.
    Aftermath of his assumption of office, Wike turned Sunday worships into a bully pulpit where he launched weekly claims of plans to rig elections, or to assassinate him for being vocal against the leaders and governments of the APC at all levels.
    So, it’s okay by Wike to use a church service, to mark Nigeria’s 61st Independence Anniversary, to allege rigging plans in 2023, and preach credible polls, and independent legislature and judiciary!
    But hasn’t Wike indirectly censored himself, as his hand is found in every political pie, whether of the PDP or APC? His across-board interference has earned him the alias, a “busybody”.
    Exploiting his seeming invincibility, Wike could indict PDP leaders and go unpunished, partly due to his enormous funding of PDP’s activities, and his fierce opposition to the APC and its leaders – an acclamatory pastime that gives needed cover to the opposition.
    On that score, Wike has done a terrific job as a nonconformist policing the APC and its officials at the federal and subnational levels, without which the leaders could take Nigerians for a ride.
    Still, only Wike could label PDP stakeholders as “tax collectors” (bribe-takers), for trying to fleece Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki for the PDP ticket for his re-election in 2020.
    Behaving to type, “Wike, nicknamed “The Emperor”, often speaks in partisan and governing affairs in the first-person’s pronouns of “me” and “I”, e.g: “I will show him/them”, “I will not take nonsense from anybody”, “They don’t know me”, “Let them try me and see”, “I fear nobody”, “I do what I like”, “Nobody can challenge me”.
    That’s why Wike is able to mesmerise PDP leaders, and had his way in literally single-handedly picking two national chairmen of the party he’s had no qualms to ditch before their terms expired.
    In February 2016, Wike, along with former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose, browbeat the NEC of the PDP to impose former Borno State Governor Modu Sheriff as national chairman.
    Sheriff, not a full-fledged PDP member, lasted only months before he’s replaced, on account of allegation that he’s scheming to derail PDP’s fortunes in favour of the APC in the 2019 elections.
    Again in December 2017, Wike caused his protégée, Prince Uche Secondus, to be coronated as national chairman, a post he’s lost, thanks to Wike’s ambition for President/Vice President in 2023.
    Needless to dwell on the non-independence of Rivers legislature and judiciary, as circumscribing of both arms of government cuts across the states, with, perhaps, the exception of Lagos State.
    State legislatures, as mere rubber-stamps to the wishes and dictates of governors, could pay a heavy price for “craving for independence”: induced impeachment of the principal officers, blocked access to the chambers, and stoppage of emoluments.
    Similarly, canvassing independence in adjudication could lead to judicial officers losing governors’ “patronage” in promotions and mouthwatering welfare packages, like luxury cars and homes.
    Fittingly on Wike’s watch, Rivers is labelled the “Political Litigation Capital of Nigeria,” not for profound judicial opinions, but on alleged “amenability” to “procure judgments” by litigants, many from outside Rivers, that file cases in breach of territorial jurisdiction.
    Unless he’s turned a new page, Wike isn’t a good candidate for mimicking free, fair and credible polls, and independence of the legislature and judiciary – all aspects that he’s “guilty as charged”.
    Mr. Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria.
  • At 61, Nigeria cannot boast of independent legislature, judiciary, credible electoral system – Wike

    At 61, Nigeria cannot boast of independent legislature, judiciary, credible electoral system – Wike

    Governor of Rivers State, Nyesom Wike as has said there is nothing to celebrate as the nation marks its 61st Independence Anniversary on Friday, October 1.

    The governor said already those in power are making moves to jeopardise the forthcoming 2023 general elections.

    He made the allegation on Sunday during an interdenominational church service in commemoration of the nation’s Independence Anniversary at the Saint Paul’s Anglican Cathedral in Diobu, Port Harcourt.

    “Other countries are talking about how their elections will be transparent, we are talking about how we will plot to rig an election in 2023,” the Governor said.

    He also raised concerns over why Nigeria is yet to adopt the electronic mode of transmission of election results.

    He believes Nigerians should have had a good reason to celebrate the country at 61 if the electoral system is made a little stronger by introducing electronic transmission of results.

    “Transmit a result electronically to show the transparency, to show that really the person you are declaring won the election is the problem,” he said.

    “I thought by now, we should be talking about how this country will be competing with other developed nations.”

    The governor also lamented the societal ills in the country, blaming poor leadership for Nigeria’s challenges.

    Wike, therefore, charged Nigerians to take personal responsibility to ensure that the values that will entrench better society are strengthened as the country marks 61 years of independence amid the socio-cultural problems and ethnoreligious intolerance.

    According to him, it feels disappointing that Nigeria at 61 years is yet to have truly independent legislative and judicial arms that can check the excesses of the executive, especially in the management of finances.

    Speaking further, he lamented that the legislature is not playing its role of holding the executive to account.

    He took a swipe at the National Assembly for not checking the excesses of the Federal Government, especially with respect to excessive borrowings.

    Wike added, “what are we celebrating about 61 years old? We have a congress (where) anything goes. Where is the legislature? A legislature that cannot speak, a legislature where anything they bring is right?

    “A legislature that cannot say that Nigeria has gotten to the age of conducting a free and fair election, a legislature that will close your eye anytime they bring money, borrow you borrow.

    “Where are the courts? The courts have been intimidated; the judges have abandoned their responsibilities out of fear of what will happen,” Wike said.

  • Multiple court judgments: NBA to interface with CJN over contradictory decisions

    Multiple court judgments: NBA to interface with CJN over contradictory decisions

    …says judgments evoke eerie and unwanted dark days

    Apparently disturbed by multiple judgements by courts of coordinate jurisdiction, arising from ex parte applications, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has vowed to interface with the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mohammed Tanko.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports this is coming barely hours after Justice Tanko, who is also Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC), summoned the Chief Judges of Rivers, Kebbi, Cross River, Anambra, Jigawa and Imo States to an emergency meeting.

    This is part of efforts to stem the recent wave of embarrassing and conflicting ex parte orders emanating from Judges in their jurisdictions.

    The NBA in a statement issued and signed by its President, Olumide Akpata wants to interface with the CJN on how to stem the ugly tide, which he said evokes eerie and unwanted dark days.

    Read full statement below:

    The @NigBarAssoc has observed with dismay the unfortunate and recurring trend of contradictory court decisions and orders, especially among courts of coordinate jurisdiction, typically arising from ex parte applications and almost always in political matters.

    While the Nigerian judiciary has in the past made invaluable contributions to the development of the country, there are nevertheless past failings which would hopefully remain permanently interred in the dark annals of history.

    It is in this regard that we view with concern the recurring contradictory decisions by our courts, based on apparently indiscriminate grant of orders and counter-orders, in a way that evokes memories of those eerie and unwanted dark days.

    We must of necessity reference the orders relating to the nomination of candidates by political parties for the forthcoming gubernatorial elections in Anambra State and the equally embarrassing situation playing out in respect of the PDP leadership crisis that has seen three different contradictory rulings by courts of coordinate jurisdiction, in circumstances that leave a lot to be desired.

    These developments in our courts are antithetical to the actualisation of the just society and independent judiciary that we all aspire to, and they run contrary to everything we teach and hold dear as a profession. Indeed, they do nothing but bring the Judiciary and the entire system of administration of justice to ridicule.

    Before blaming the judges, we must first look inwards and call out our members, most of whom are senior members of the Bar, who continue to yield themselves to be used as willing tools by politicians to wantonly abuse the judicial process.

    In our view, these actions contravene the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 (“RPC”) especially the cardinal Rule 1 of the RPC which requires a lawyer to uphold and observe the rule of law, promote and foster the cause of justice, maintain a high standard of professional conduct, and not engage in any conduct which is unbecoming of a legal practitioner.

    We also concur with the Hon. Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme of the Court of Appeal in her condemnation of the indulgence by some judicial officers of politicians who go round the country shopping for judgments, and who thereby bring the Judiciary to public ridicule. Beyond that we shall say no more at this time.

    I will on behalf of the NBA, urgently seek audience with My Lord, the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria to address this issue holistically. the support of the Chairman of the NBA Judiciary Committee, Dr. Babatunde Ajibade, SAN as well as the Chairpersons of the NBA Section of Legal Practice (NBA-SLP) and NBA Section on Public Interest and Development Law (NBA-SPIDEL), Mr. Oluwaseun Abimbola, SAN and Dr. Monday Ubani for this proposed engagement.

    The NBA, as the prime defender of the integrity and independence of the Judiciary, cannot and will not be a spectator whilst our hard-earned democracy is threatened by the venal acts of a few. This is particularly so as the nation approaches its next round of general elections. It can no longer be business as usual.

    OLUMIDE AKPATA

    NBA President

    30 August 2021

  • Again, INEC raises alarm on conflicting judgements, appeals NBA, judiciary to intervene

    Again, INEC raises alarm on conflicting judgements, appeals NBA, judiciary to intervene

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has again raised an alarming over conflicting court judgements on electoral matters.

    INEC National Commissioner and Chairman of Information and Voter Education Committee, Mr Festus Okoye, believes such a trend poses a serious threat to the nation’s electoral system if it is allowed to continue.

    “What is going on is what in legal parlance, we call ‘forum shopping’ — people who are looking for a place where they can get a favourable decision,” he said on Friday on a monitored Channels Television programme.

    “I believe that it is important for the Nigerian Bar Association and for the judiciary to intervene in what is going on because if this spate of multiple and conflicting court orders is carried forward to the 2023 general elections, it is going to have far-reaching consequences on our electoral process.”

    The INEC spokesman referenced the events in the build-up to the governorship election in Anambra State scheduled to hold on November 6, 2021.

    He decried the situation where the electoral umpire received multiple court orders as a result of the actions of politicians who he said were shopping for favourable judgements.

    Okoye, however, stated that the laws of the land do not empower a court to stop an election or political party primaries.

    He explained that Section 285 of the Constitution fundamentally gave the definition of pre-election matter.

    According to the INEC official, a pre-election matter can only be filed by an aspirant in a party primary election or by a political party that complains about the breach of the decisions of the electoral umpire or the Electoral Act.

    “For a party primary that took place in Anambra, for instance, some people will go to Bauchi State, some people will go to Jigawa State, some people will go to Imo state and to other places to go and look for a place where they can get a favourable decision,” he said.

    “So, I think that all the institutions that are concerned must intervene, and courts must not donate their jurisdiction, donate their forum for people who engage in forum shopping.

    “By so doing, some persons may at the end bring the institution of the judiciary to disrepute and that will not augur well for our democracy and for our electoral process.”

  • Senate to Governors: Autonomy for judiciary non-negotiable

    Senate to Governors: Autonomy for judiciary non-negotiable

    The Senate on Monday told the 36 Governors to grant autonomy to judiciary, saying independence of the judiciary is not negotiable.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, made the call while answering questions from reporters in Abuja.

    Bamidele said it is laughable to be grappling with judicial autonomy at this stage of the nation’s development.

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG reports that the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) had declared an industrial action and nationwide protests to compel governors to obey the 1999 constitution (as amended) and Executive Order 10 which granted autonomy to judiciary in the country.

    While responding to a question, Opeyemi said: “It is laughable that at this point, we are still grappling with the need to grant independence to the judiciary arm of government at the state and local government levels.

    “The National Assembly has been making laws that would guarantee full autonomy to the judiciary at the Federal level.

    “The National Assembly does not make laws for the states; such power resides in the state Houses of Assembly.

    “Judiciary at the Federal Capital Territory is independent because we have done what we are supposed to do.

    “What is next is for the State Houses of Assembly to do what they are supposed to do.

    “As a principle, as a policy, members of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, have tried not to call on those who are protesting to stop such protests.

    “We do not want protests but definitely, we would rather talk more to State Governors, Houses of Assembly and other stakeholders to do the needful in the overriding public interest.

    “We cannot continue to call on the judiciary to give peace a chance when we know the conditions under which they work cannot guarantee a passionate and enhanced delivery of justice.

    “We are talking about judicial reforms; we are talking about the need for justice sector reforms.

    “This is central and crucial to the independence of the judiciary in this country. We must not be left behind by the rest of the civilized world.

    “Nobody stands to lose anything by granting independence to judiciary at the state level since it has been done at the national level.

    “The fact that workers and staff of federal judiciary are joining the protest is only in solidarity with their colleagues at the state levels.

    “It is a union matter and we do not have a control over it. We are hereby calling on the State Governors to do the needful because the independence of the judiciary is non- negotiable.

    “No democracy can survive without being founded on the rule of law and independent judiciary.”

  • Judiciary workers shut down Lagos courts as JUSUN strike begins

    Judiciary workers shut down Lagos courts as JUSUN strike begins

    In compliance with the nationwide strike embarked on by judiciary workers under the aegis of Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), all High and Magistrates Courts in Lagos were shut on Tuesday.

    JUSUN declared an indefinite nationwide strike to press home their demand for the financial autonomy of the judiciary.

    A NAN correspondent who monitored developments, reports that at the premises of the Federal High Court, Lagos, some lawyers were seen standing around the court’s premises with no ongoing activities, while some members of the union were seen around the court.

    President Muhammadu Buhari had on May 22, 2020, signed into law an Executive Order granting financial autonomy to the legislature and the judiciary across the 36 states of the federation.

    The Executive Order No. 10 of 2020, made it mandatory for all states to include the allocations of both the legislature and the judiciary in the first-line charge of their budgets.

    The order also mandates the accountant-general of the federation to deduct from source amount due to the state legislatures and judiciaries from the monthly allocation to each state, for states that refuse to grant such autonomy.

    JUSUN on April 3 issued a circular ordering the closure of courts across the country from April 6, as a measure to ensure an implementation of the order.

    The union is demanding immediate implementation of a financial autonomy for the judiciary, as provided for by the order .

    Mr Kehinde Shobowale, Chairman JUSUN, Lagos chapter, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Tuesday in Lagos that all entrances to courts premises in the state would remain closed until the union’s demands were met.

    On the implication of the strike on court activities in the state he said:

    “It is just “a simple strike” involving our members, and this means that whoever is a member of JUSUN Lagos Branch will go on strike.

    “That means they will stay at home while only the exco members will be on ground at the high courts. All our gates will be locked.

    “I would not know if this will affect the activities of courts or not, but all I know is that the entrances to all courts in Lagos State will be locked.

    “For us in Lagos State, we believe that the Judiciary is still under something I can conveniently refer to as bondage.

    “Section 81(3) of the Constitution as amended is so explicit as to what should happen to the finance of the Judiciary; so, why are people not obeying the constitution.

    “Order 10 which was signed by the president was to put that section of the constitution in motion, but implementation has not been done, hence, the Judiciary still go “cap in hand” to the executive for funds to run the courts, and that has led the Judiciary to been in bondage.

    “So, our agitations is that let them obey the constitution, let the Judiciary be free.

    “Let us have our money from the consolidated revenue fund directly to the hands of the Chief Judge, then, we the members of staff can now demand whatever we want from our chief judge.

    “If you look at the Constitution very well, we are public officers not civil servants, so, the constitution takes very good care of us.

    “This time around, it is either they allow us to be autonomous or we remain closed indefinitely,” Shobowale said.

  • Insecurity: El-Rufai demands establishment of state police, decentralised judiciary

    Insecurity: El-Rufai demands establishment of state police, decentralised judiciary

    Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has joined his voice with national analysts calling for devolution of power between the Federal Government and 36 states in the country.

    The governor who was one of the speakers at a programme called ‘Radio Now’s Urgent Conversation’ aired Thursday said state police and devolution of the judiciary is important to save Nigeria from the brink of collapse.

    “I will dwell on three of the issues that I believe are critical to the immediate needs of the country to pull back from the brink.

    “The first, it is imperative for Federal, state, and community policing. We do not have enough police. One centralised police for the country just has not worked.

    “Secondly, we must amend the constitution and relevant laws to ensure control of oil and gas, mines, and minerals in the states that already have control over land under the land use Act with royalties and taxes payable to the Federal Government and the Federation Account

    “Number three, we must rectify the anomaly of a Federation that has a more or less unitary judiciary,” the governor explained.

    While stressing his earlier points highlighted, the governor said, “My first recommendation is to implement the three key devolution proposals that I mentioned above. Give us state police now, vest all minerals in the state now, and decentralised our judiciary now, not tomorrow, not later.”

    El-Rufai also stressed that banditry is a national problem and it is the responsibility of relevant stakeholders to calm nerves through their utterances and not fan the embers of division.

    “It is an understatement to say that Nigeria is in one of its most difficult moments. The genuine fears for their lives and property felt by many citizens across the country need to be assuaged. All responsible persons must show compassion to our compatriots that have been affected while calming nerves.

    “Banditry is a national problem, with victims from all parts of the country, and we should address it with a common resolve,” El-Rufai said.

    According to the governor, the country requires elite consensus to take the poison out of identity politics.