Tag: Kenya

  • Kenya on verge of signing anti-LGBTQ bill in Parliament

    Kenya on verge of signing anti-LGBTQ bill in Parliament

    With Kenya on the verge of tabling anti-LGBT legislation in parliament, advocacy groups in the US have called for a halt to trade talks between the two countries.

    Led by MP George Peter Kaluma, a member of opposition politician Raila Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement, the proposed bill would further criminalise same-sex acts with penalties ranging from a suggested minimum of ten years in prison to the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”, defined as “engaging in homosexual acts with a minor or disabled person and transmitting a terminal disease through sexual means.”

    The proposed Family Protection Act would also see a total ban on any activities “that promote homosexuality”, such as wearing flags or emblems of the LGBTQ community.

    Kenya already criminalises same-sex acts with penalties of up to 14 years in prison.

    Kaluma’s campaign has horrified advocacy groups, including a coalition in the United States who have called on President Biden to suspend trade talks.

    The coalition, comprising a number of LGBTQI+, labor, trade, HIV, and human rights groups, on Monday sent a letter to the US Trade Representative Katherine Tai, timed to coincide with her visit to Kenya for the launch of the United States-Kenya Strategic Trade and Investment Partnership, STIP.

    In their letter, the groups called on Ambassador Tai to “pause STIP negotiation until President Ruto commits to vetoing this bill”.

    Members of US Congress also wrote to the ambassador in June to express their concern, saying “The United States must make clear to both Kenya and other countries considering similar legislation that we will not stand idly by as they move to criminalize or further criminalise people for being LGBTQI+.”

    Growing anti-LGBTQ sentiment

    The proposed bill in Kenya comes following Uganda’s new Anti-Homosexuality Bill passed into law in May by President Yoweri Museveni. Considered one of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQ laws, it fully criminalises same-sex acts, with possible penalties of life imprisonment or death penalty.

    In Ghana, lawmakers are in the process of amending the country’s own anti-LGBTQ legislation with propositions of a three-year prison sentence for anyone who identifies as LGBTQ and a 10-year sentence for anyone who promotes homosexuality.

    In Kenya, the Nairobi-based National Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission have reported a surge in number of attacks against the community. Calls it has received reporting abuse, including assaults, threats and discrimination, rose from 78 in January to 117 in February and 367 in March, the commission said.

  • Kenya launches digital register of convicted s3x offenders

    Kenya launches digital register of convicted s3x offenders

    Kenya’s Chief Justice Martha Koome inaugurated the country’s first digital s*x offender registry on Monday.

    She said this at the Convicted S”xual Offenders Electronic Register at the Kibera Law Courts in Nairobi, emphasising its potential to effectively combat sex offences.

    Koome noted the importance of the register as an elaborate database containing important information on all convicted s*x offenders, according to local media reports.

    “The register will enable the actors in the justice chain to monitor and supervise s*xual offenders after their release from prison,” she said.

    “It will also enable the public to access information on sexual offenders in their neighbourhoods and take precautionary measures to protect themselves and their children.”

    The digital mechanism will not only serve as a deterrent but will also play a pivotal role in prevention and rehabilitation efforts targeting s*x offenders.

    According to Anadolu Agency, the electronic register will also enable law enforcement agencies and other authorised bodies to efficiently track and monitor convicted individuals, enhancing public awareness and safety.

    Kenya has been actively embracing digital advancements to enhance efficiency and streamline services across various sectors.

    In recent years, the country has grappled with the pervasive issue of s*x offences, which have posed significant challenges to the safety and well-being of its citizens.

  • SHOCKING! Residents found widow living with her husband’s corpse as police launch probe

    SHOCKING! Residents found widow living with her husband’s corpse as police launch probe

    Residents of Nakuru in Kenya were shocked after they discovered a grieving widow kept her husband’s corpse inside her home for a week.

    The unidentified woman from Molo in Nakuru County is said to be mentally ill and residents became suspicious after the man went missing for a period of time without any information.

     

    While confirming the incident, area chief Evans Oketch encouraged locals to embrace neighbourliness.

    He said;

    “We should always know whereabout of each other and help each other in times of need.”

    His body was uncovered by officers drawn from Molo Police Station and moved to the morgue. Police have since launched a probe into the matter. The residents now await an autopsy to identify the cause of the man’s death.

  • Musings after 48 hours with Raila Odinga – By Azu Ishiekwene

    Musings after 48 hours with Raila Odinga – By Azu Ishiekwene

    At first, he appeared to be the most unlikely candidate for the task. After his fifth attempt at running for Kenya’s presidency, surely Raila Odinga is finished, done. The only thing left perhaps was how to update his memoirs. But who needs nuggets from a loser who couldn’t put them to use himself?

    These were the thoughts that weighed on our minds as we thought of inviting former Kenyan Prime Minister and freshly defeated candidate of the Orange Democratic Movement, Raila Odinga, to the 14th edition of the LEADERSHIP annual conference and awards.

    It’s also interesting that since he narrowly lost last year’s presidential election to William Ruto who framed the campaign as an epic battle of “hustler vs. dynasty”, Odinga has received several invitations to speak at major international forums in the US and Europe. There must be a lesson or two about his defeat that keeps the world wanting to hear from his experience.

    But the attraction for LEADERSHIP was even more. On the eve of Nigeria’s general election, with its attendant anxieties, tensions and concerns that violence could mar the outcome – or worse, upend it altogether – who else is more qualified to share valuable experience than a man who was a presidential candidate in the Kenyan general election in 2007, which claimed over 1,200 lives and another election in 2017 which left at least 37 dead, many more wounded and thousands fleeing their homes?

    Only last October, former two-term Kenyan President and also contestant in these two elections, Uhuru Kenyatta, was the guest of the Nigerian government at a ministerial performance retreat in Abuja.

    Unlike when he came on a state visit eight years ago, Kenyatta made no public statements this time, leaving a heavy cloud of cynicism in some circles that the man who betrayed Odinga and paved the way for Ruto’s victory, was perhaps delighted to sneak into Abuja, Nigeria’s capital, like a thief in the night.

    The press couldn’t get Kenyatta to clear the air. So, we thought it would be a good idea to invite Odinga, described as one of the most consequential Kenyan politicians in the last three decades by Professor Femi Badejo in his notable biography, “Raila Odinga: An Enigma in Kenyan Politics”, to shed some light on the cauldron of Kenyan elections.

    I’m glad we did. My two previous articles on Kenya after the October presidential elections leaned more towards Ruto, because I felt strongly that the Odinga and Kenyatta dynasties have run their course and that perhaps Kenyan politics deserved a breath of fresh air.

    But inviting Odinga carried its own risks, too. Just one day before he arrived in Abuja, he held a huge rally in Jacaranda, Nairobi, where he announced there would be a series of rallies against Ruto’s government.

    Odinga insisted that the government was illegitimate, vowed that he would not be silenced, and likened Ruto’s government to the biblical tax collector, Zacchaeus, notorious for inflicting punitive taxes on the people. And then the next day, he got on the plane and headed to Abuja, with a six-member delegation comprising a professor and a senator, to speak on “Credible Elections and an Economy in Transition”.

    If the topic sounded just right for Nigeria ahead of an election foreshadowed by deadly attacks on voting infrastructure, widespread displacement of populations as a result of banditry, and economic chaos; it presented different optics for Nigeria’s diplomatic relations with Kenya.

    Giving Odinga, the leader of the largest opposition party, a microphone after his Jacaranda rally, was like providing a foreign staging post for attacks on the new government in Nairobi, still struggling. It could be seen as lending the “enemy” a hand.

    But it doesn’t matter. Part of why Africa has experienced five unconstitutional changes in government in two years, with West Africa as the epicentre, has been because of shambolic management of elections and political transitions, among other things.

    The continent must grow beyond the rituals of holding periodic elections, which are increasingly trigger points for violent changes in governments. Africa has to find a way to make politics work for a far greater number of citizens who are currently either induced or indifferent spectators in their own game. A good place to start would be a robust opposition. That is why it made sense to hear Odinga out. And he didn’t disappoint.

    As we waited for him to join us at the welcome dinner in Transcorp Hilton on Monday night, I wondered what he was going to say. The Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Boss Mustapha, was present as were representatives of the Kenyan High Commission, and a crème of professionals and business people.

    Just a few days earlier a friend had shared a viral video of Odinga with me where the former prime minister ribbed his audiences with a bitter joke about Nigeria. It was about a Nigerian minister on a visit to Malaysia, who was told by his host that 10 percent of the money for the nice roads in Kuala Lumpur had been diverted to build the palatial house where the Nigerian minister was being hosted.

    On the Malays’ return visit, he wanted to know where his Nigerian counterpart got the money to build his own palatial house, especially since the roads he had seen were filled with potholes. The Nigerian minister took his guest to the window, smiled and said, “100 percent of what was supposed to have been used to build the roads was used here (pointing to his palace).”

    Yet, if you have read Michela Wrong’s “It’s Our Turn to Eat”, you might forgive Kenyans for making corruption in Nigeria the butt of their jokes. No matter, something told me that out of courtesy, Odinga, a politician who prefaces his speeches with jokes and wisecracks, will as a matter of courtesy, spare Nigeria this time.

    When the former prime minister and leader of the Kenyan Orange Democratic Movement finally showed up in the dinner room without airs, no fuss. He wore a simple blue-and-white long-sleeve kaftan top over a white pair of trousers and entered the room like the regular Joe.

    In my brief comments before he took the podium, I improvised his Malaysian joke saying that he would find Abuja’s main roads well paved. I added that while I wasn’t sure that a kobo of the money used for the roads found its way into the palatial hotel, I could assure him that his host, LEADERSHIP, can account for the cost of the dinner we were about to have.

    He later told guests that the last time he was in Nigeria was in 2007 as a member of the international observers for the general elections that year and recounted how a policeman who had flagged down his car insisted that he looked every inch a Nigerian and admonished him for flouting the restriction order.

    And then, he spoke about the Kenyan election. He said new evidence from the server which the Supreme Court had denied access during the post-election legal dispute, showed that over two million votes which could have given him a clear edge over Ruto were suppressed.

    “How can anyone live with such injustice?” he asked. At that moment I surveyed the room and locked eyes with the representative of the Kenyan ambassador. His face was expressionless.

    Odinga wasn’t done. He said he would not be silenced and that he didn’t think it was too much not just to ask for justice to be done, but for it to be seen to be done and for the will of the Kenya people to find true expression.

    The old war horse that he is, the next day, the main conference day, he deployed a tactical manoeuvre. Of course, he expressed concern about more elections and yet less credible outcomes, about state capture of election management bodies, and the use of voting machines to rig, Odinga left the heavy, pointed lifting to his cohort, Akau Mutua, a Kenyan American professor of Law based in New York.

    Speaking off tempore, Mutua hammered the Kenyan Supreme Court for obstructing access to vital evidence and for its complicity in perverting the course of justice. It’s only a matter of time, he said, before the shenanigans would unravel. As Mutua said that the hall erupted in applause and I spotted Odinga smiling.

    “So, what are you going to do about the newly discovered two million votes”, I asked him later that day in his hotel.

    “You wait and see”, he replied. “We’re building a movement that will hold the system to account for its injustice. How can there be another election until this matter is resolved?”

    At this point, I remembered what his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, might have said of Kenya: “It’s not yet uhuru!”

     

    Ishiekwene is Editor-In-Chief of LEADERSHIP

  • What you contribute in marriage is what you take in divorce – Supreme Court of Kenya rules

    What you contribute in marriage is what you take in divorce – Supreme Court of Kenya rules

    The Supreme Court of Kenya has ruled that what a person contributed to their marriage is what they will take in the event of a divorce, abolishing the law of “50:50 division of matrimonial properties”.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the Supreme Court of Kenya passed the landmark ruling on Friday, January 27 in a divorce dispute between Joseph Ombogi Ogentoto and his ex-wife, Martha Bosibori.

    Ogentoto took the matter to the Supreme Court after a Court of Appeal ordered that the house in which he had lived with his ex-wife of 18 years and the rental units be shared equally between them on a 50:50 ratio.

    The Court of Appeal had ordered the complainant, Ogentoto to share his properties on a 50:50 ratio with Bosibori in 2018. He argued that Bosibori had not contributed anything towards the acquisition of the properties.

    To sum up their resolutions, the five-judge bench led by deputy chief justice Philomena Mwilu ruled that implying that matrimonial wealth should be automatically shared at a ratio of 50:50 would bring huge difficulties within marriages.

    This is opposed to the controversial traditional assumption that one was entitled to a 50 per cent share.

    According to them, such a precedent would encourage some parties to only enter into marriages, comfortably subsist in the marriage without making any monetary or non-monetary contribution, proceed to have the marriage dissolved then wait to be automatically given 50% of the marital property.

    The judges also held that each partner in marriage must prove his or her contribution to the family wealth to enable a court to determine the percentage available to him or her at the distribution of the matrimonial property.

    The judge had listed roles that would qualify a spouse as one who has contributed to the wealth in question.

    This includes: contributing to the purchase price of the matrimonial property, contributing regularly to the monthly payments in the acquisition of such property and making a substantial financial contribution to the family expenses so as to enable the mortgage instalments to be paid.

    Others are contributing to the running of and welfare of the home and easing the burden of the spouse paying for the property and caring for children and the family at large as the other spouse works to earn money to pay for the property.

    The Friday Supreme Court decision will, moving forward, act as the guidelines for the distribution of matrimonial property between divorced spouses.

  • SAD: Methodist Church wedding guests killed in road accident

    SAD: Methodist Church wedding guests killed in road accident

    Four people travelling for a wedding ceremony in Nairobi, Kenya have been reported dead after the vehicle they were in involved in a road accident.

    According to local media reports, several others were injured in the road crash that occurred in Njuri, Tharaka Nithi on the Meru-Nairobi Highway early Saturday.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) learnt that a bus belonging to Ruiri Girl’s High School was ferrying members of Thau Methodist Church from Tigania West to the wedding ceremony in Karen, Nairobi when the accident happened at around 5 am.

    Tharaka Nithi County Disaster Manager, Mr Alex Mugambi confirmed the accident.

    “Survivors were taken to Chuka County Referral Hospital and four people, who we fear are dead, are still trapped in the wreckage,” said Mr Mugambi.

    Thau church chairman, Joseph Limuli said the driver lost control of the bus after one of its tyres burst. He said they had left the village after 2am.

    “We are worried that the four who are trapped may be dead now because they are currently not responding to calls like before,” said Mr Limuli.

  • There’s hope for Africa’s greatness – Lumumba

    There’s hope for Africa’s greatness – Lumumba

    A former anti-corruption chief in Kenya, Prof. Patrick Lumumba has tasked African countries to work collectively and harness the resources and potentials of the continent.

    Lumumba said this on Thursday in Abuja as Guest Lecturer at the National Institute for Security Studies, Bwari, Abuja.

    His lecture themed, “Conspiracy Theory and the Future of Democracy and Development in Africa,” was part of the institution’s graduation lecture for the 78 graduates of 2022 Executive Intelligence Management Course 15.

    While blaming the crises situation in Africa on the poor governance, the motivational speaker said African leaders must unite to tackle the challenges and harness the resources and potentials, or the continent will continue to plunge.

    He said, “if African leaders can work as a team under the African Union (AU) Agenda 2063 agreement, there will be improvement in all the sectors of health, research, climate change, women participation, energy, agriculture and communication among others.

    “At the moment, Africa is disunited, weak and disrespected as we are mentally captured and there is urgent need for decolonization.”

    He urged the graduands to put their experience into practice in order to change the narrative of African over the continued dependence on former colonial masters.

    Earlier, while congratulating the graduands, the National Security Adviser, Maj.-Gen Babagana Monguno, represented by Mr Aliyu Muhammad, urged them to deploy their knowledge to enhance the nation’s security architecture.

    Highlight of the event was a book launch in honour of the Director-General, State Services, Yusuf Magaji-Bichi, titled, ‘Manning the Gates.”

  • Court orders FG to return IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu to Kenya

    Court orders FG to return IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu to Kenya

    A Federal High Court in Umuahia, Abia, on Wednesday, ordered the Federal Government to return Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, to Kenya before his rendition on June 19, 2021.
    Delivering judgment, Justice Evelyn Anyadike, also awarded Kanu N500m in general damages.
     Kanu prayed to the court to redress his infamous unlawful expulsion or extraordinary rendition from Kenya by the Federal Government.
    The suit which was filed in March, has the Federal Government, the Attorney-General of the Federal and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami and President Muhammadu Buhari as respondents.
    The court referred to the Court of Appeal judgment of Oct.13 in Abuja and granted all the eight reliefs sought by Kanu, which bothered on extraordinary rendition.
    The court held that the expulsion or extraordinary rendition of  Kanu is a clear violation of his fundamental rights under Article 12(4) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, as well as Chapter IV of the Nigerian Constitution.
    It held that the manner of arrest, torture, continued detention and denial of the right to fair hearing amounted to a brazen violation of Kanu’s rights.
    While delivering the one-and-half-hour judgment, Anyadike held that the burden was on the respondents to justify their actions, which they failed to do so.
    Reacting, Kanu’s counsel, Mr Alloy Ejimakor hailed the court for what he described as a “painstaking judgment.”
    According to him, it shows that the court is the last hope of the common man and has reinstated our confidence in the judiciary as lawyers.
    Ejimakor said: ‘what is the most important in today’s judgment is not the money awarded to us as damages, but the court’s order that Kanu should be restored to the status quo as of June 19, 2021.
    “I, therefore, call on the Federal Government to take prompt steps to obey this court order and restore Kanu to the status quo.”
    There was no appearance in court on behalf of the respondents.
  • Court to deliver judgment on Nnamdi Kanu’s extraordinary rendition suit

    Court to deliver judgment on Nnamdi Kanu’s extraordinary rendition suit

    A Federal High Court in Umuahia, Abia, is to deliver judgment in the extraordinary rendition suit filed by Nnamdi Kanu,  the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

    Aloy Ejimakor, Special Counsel to Kanu, had filed the suit before the court in March.

    Kanu is asking the court to redress his infamous unlawful expulsion or extraordinary rendition from Kenya by the  Federal Government.

    Justice Evelyn Anyadike fixed the date for judgment, after the adoption of addresses by the counsel to the plaintiff and the defendant.

    Counsel to the plantiff, in the originating summons described the suit as sui generis (of a special class).

    He contended that the expulsion of extraordinary rendition of Kanu is a clear violation of his fundamental rights under Article 12(4) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, as well as Chapter IV of the Nigerian Constitution.

    He asked the court to redress myriad of violations that came with Kanu’s rendition, such as torture, unlawful detention, and denial of the right to fair hearing as required by law before anybody can be expelled from one country to the other.

    Ejimakor also sought to halt Kanu’s prosecution and restore him to the status quo before his rendition on June 19, 2021.

    However, the counsel to the respondent, Mr. Simon Eno of the Federal Ministry of Justice, urged the court to dismiss the suit.

    Eno described the suit as an abuse of the court process, saying that the issues sought were already decided by Justice Benson Anya of the Abia State High Cout, in Jan. 19, 2022.

    Ejimakor countered the defense counsel’s submission, saying that the court only decided that portion of the violation of Kanu’s fundamental rights that occurred in 2017.

    He explained that when he made claims that bordered on rendition, the court declined jurisdiction.

    Kanu’s counsel said that the court did so on grounds that rendition, being related to extradition, lied within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court.

    According to him, this is what informed his decision to initiate the suit before the Federal High Court.

  • Ruto and Falana: Brother for enslavement and brother for liberation – By Owei Lakemfa

    Ruto and Falana: Brother for enslavement and brother for liberation – By Owei Lakemfa

    His Excellency William Ruto, Kenya’s newly minted President, prides himself as the Hustler-in-Chief of the country. He says he is from the “Hustler Nation” – the informal economy where he used to sell chickens for survival.

    However, having a dog-eat-dog street ideology as he claims, does not preclude a sense of basic human decency. It is indecent and completely un-African for a man to invite a brother to a ceremony with the latter traveling 6,090 kilometres to rejoice with him, only for the celebrant to announce to the world that the brother he invited, in his view, no longer exists!

    That was what Ruto did when President Brahim Ghali of of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic ,SADR, better known as Western Sahara honoured the Tuesday September 13, 2022 invitation to attend Ruto’s inauguration.

    The next day, when the Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita visited him, Ruto tweeted: “At State House in Nairobi, received a congratulatory message from His Majesty King Mohammed VI. Kenya rescinds its recognition of the SADR and initiates steps to wind down the entity’s presence in the country.”

    The world was stunned because even a man high on substance would not behave that way. Shocked Kenyans were up in arms and Ruto quickly deleted his tweet. An embarrassed Kenyan Foreign Ministry two days later, issued a statement signed by its Principal Secretary, Ambassador Macharia Kamau, distancing Kenya from its new President and reiterating the country’s commitment to the African Union, AU, and the United Nations, UN, Security Council Resolution 690 of 1991 for a fair referendum in Western Sahara. It dismissed Ruto’s tweet as: “ Kenya does not conduct its foreign policy on Twitter or any other social media platforms, rather through official government documents and frameworks.”

    What did the Moroccan Monarchy offer or promise Ruto? Was it part of the Western Sahara phosphate and riches it has been using to entice poor African countries and bribe the European Union, EU, until the European Court stepped in?

    It is expected that the President of an African country like Kenya which so courageously fought for liberation and lost over 20,000 liberation fighters, including its symbol, Dedan Kimathi, would value freedom. That Ruto would forget the contributions of Kenya to the decolonisation of the continent and back an African country colonising a sister African country, is a betrayal.

    He claims to be Kenya’s first evangelical Christian President; how come he does not seem to have heard the Biblical injunction: “Thou shall not covet your neigbour’s house…nor anything that is your neigbour’s” as Morocco is doing in Western Sahara?

    So, in the first two days of his presidency, Ruto had to swallow his words, but he is likely to try again to subvert the Kenyan and African peoples.

    Western Sahara was occupied by Spain in 1884 and converted into Spanish Sahara in 1934. The 21st Session of United Nations General Assembly on December 20, 1966 declared “the inalienable right of the peoples of Ifni and Spanish Sahara to self-determination”. It therefore asked Spain to conduct a referendum that would allow the Saharawi exercise their right to self-determination.

    Spain on August 20, 1974 announced it was going to abide by the UN’s decision by holding the referendum. On October 16, 1975 the International Court of Justice, ICJ, based on the request by the UN, ruled that there is no legal link or territorial supremacy binding Western Sahara with either Morocco or Mauritania. Spain on November 14, 1975 decided to abandon Western Sahara, including exhuming Spanish corpses from the cemeteries.

    With Spain fleeing, Western Sahara got its independence. However, on April 14, 1976, its neigbours, Morocco and Mauritania, invaded the new country and shared it. The Saharawi fought back under the POLISARIO Liberation Front. But while Mauritania later abandoned its own share of the loot, Morocco continues to hold on to it. In 1984, the Organisation African Unity, OAU, based on the recognition of most African countries, admitted Western Sahara as a full member. In reaction, Morocco left the OAU.

    A contrast to President Ruto is the international lawyer, Mr Femi Falana of Nigeria, who is leading various human rights campaigns on the continent, including the right of the African peoples to freedom. A torn in the Moroccan monarchy’s flesh, he uses advocacy and the courts to advance the rights of the Saharawi people to live in a country free of foreign occupation, rights abuses and discrimination.

    One of the most famous cases he was involved in was that of Western Sahara icon, Madame Aminatou Haidar, who had visited Nigeria and the United States in 2009 but was prevented from re-entering Morocco on her way home in occupied Western Sahara. Morocco which claims the Saharawi are Moroccan nationals, seized her passport and exiled her to the Canary Islands, Spain, effectively making her a stateless person.

    She refused to leave the Lanzarote Airport, insisting she must be returned to Morocco and allowed travel to her beloved Western Sahara. Falana mounted a legal defence for her and as the then President of the West African Bar Association, WABA, flew out to the Canary Islands to offer Haidar who was on hunger strike, solidarity and legal services.

    In a joint press conference he held with her, Falana warned that : “African lawyers cannot ignore the enormity of the crimes committed by the Moroccan authorities against Sahrawi civilians…”. The international campaigns became an embarrassment and the Moroccan Monarchy buckled and allowed Haidar return home.

    At that press conference, Falana vowed to “take all necessary steps at the level of the statutory bodies of Africa and the UN, to win respect for the rights of the Sahrawi people to self-determination and also to guarantee for its activists and lawyers the freedom of movement and the peaceful expression of opinions and political beliefs.”

    In September, 2022, thirteen years later, Falana fulfilled part of that vow when he successfully sued six African countries: Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana, Mali, Malawi and Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Arusha, Tanzania. The court, ruling in Falana’s favour held that “the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara is a serious violation of the right to self-determination (and) all states have legal obligations to assist the Sahrawi people in the full realisation of their right to self-determination and independence.” So African countries should not have admitted Morocco into the African Union.

    The African court also declared that “the presence of Moroccan forces in Western Sahara is a military occupation, which violates international law”.

    So, while Brother Ruto is working for the enslavement and colonisation of the African peoples in Western Sahara, Brother Falana is fighting for their liberation and the complete de-colonisation of the African continent. Time will tell.