Tag: lawyer

  • Video: Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer, Ejiofor Speaks From Hiding

    Ifeanyi Ejiofor, the lawyer to the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has broken silence on the invasion of his residence by men of the Anambra State Police Command.

    Recall that in the early hours of Monday, when a combined team of police and military officers invaded Ejiofor’s residence in Oraifite, Anambra State, killed four persons including two police officers dead.

    Several others were injured in the ensuing clash between the Police and the residents.

    Following the incident, the police which claimed IPOB members were responsible for the attack and for the death of the two police officers who were burnt to death, declared Ejiofor wanted.

    Ejiofor, however, released a video on Facebook on Tuesday with the claim that some police officers took away the corpses of those killed and burnt them somewhere.

    He added that his mother was gunned down and was presently receiving treatment at the hospital.

    Watch video below:

    https://web.facebook.com/IPOBS/videos/2486231108326459/

     

  • BREAKING: Police declare Kanu’s lawyer wanted over death of two officers

    Police in Anambra State have declared Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor, lawyer to the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu wanted.

    The Commissioner of Police, John Abang disclosed this in a press conference in Awka on Tuesday.

    He said the declaration of the lawyer and his cohorts wanted, was in connection with the alleged brutal murder of two Police officers in Oraifite, Ekwusigo Local Government Area of Anambra State on Monday.

    He said, “I’ll like Nigerians to know that Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor (a member of the proscribed IPOB) has been declared wanted.

    “I’ll seek the cooperation of law-abiding Nigerians, East, West, North and South that wherever they find this individual, they should report to the nearest Police Station for possible arrest and prosecution based on the rules and laws of Nigeria.”

    Police spokesperson, Haruna Mohammed, had disclosed that two Police officers were killed by the suspected IPOB members while others were inflicted with machete cuts in the incident.

    He said, “On the 2/12/2019 at about 11:30 am, there was a formal complaint against One Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor ‘m’ (a member of the proscribed IPOB) in Oraifite on alleged case of abduction, assault occasioning harm and malicious damage to property.

    “Following the report, Police Patrol teams led by the Area Commander, Oraifite ACP Oliver Abbey mobilised and rushed to the scene in order to arrest the suspect who declined Police invitation.

    “However, as soon as Police arrived the house, armed men suspected to be IPOB members descended on the Police, set ablaze one Patrol vehicle and attacked them with rifles and machetes.

    “As a result of the attack, two Police officers whose identities are being withheld were killed by the suspected IPOB members while others were inflicted with machete cuts.

    “The injured personnel were rushed to the hospital for medical attention and are presently receiving treatment.

    “Consequently, the Command deployed reinforcements from the State Headquarters comprising of PMF, SARS and Special Anti Cult Units in conjunction with the Army/other Sister agencies who cordoned off the area in order to fish out the culprits,while Joint patrol are still ongoing in the town to prevent further breakdown of law and order.

    “Some arrests were made and the Commissioner of Police CP John Abang who is on his way to the scene has vowed to bring perpetrators of this dastardly act to justice.”

    Meanwhile, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has accused the police of setting on fire the home of Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor, lawyer of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu in Oraifite, Anambra State.

    In a statement by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, the group wondered why the Police would go further to raze the lawyer’s home even after killing two unarmed and innocent civilians.

    It explained that the carelessness of the police in handling the petrol they used to drench Barr. Ejiofor’s home and nearby businesses before setting them on fire that trailed back, leading to the fire that gutted their van.

    The statement partly read, “The unprovoked Nigeria police and army invasion of the home of our lawyer Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor barely four days after the painful burial of his senior brother is proof that those running Nigeria have descended into the abyss of iniquity from which they may never recover.

    “Not even during the darkest days of Abacha’s dictatorship did anyone witness such brazen intimidation of a legal counsel or the attempted assassination of a defence counsel in a high profile case.

    “It is the golden rule of every legal system under the Sun that defence counsels are not harassed, intimidated or killed but it seems nothing is sacrosanct in the present circumstance.

    “We don’t expect the roundly docile and cowardly Nigeria Bar Association or their impotent and subdued National Judicial Council to rise up in condemnation of this contemptuous behaviour by Aso Rock in this latest attempt to kill Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor.

    “This level of dictatorial impunity against the rule of law, judicial process and natural justice must not be condoned by any right-thinking person.

    The group described the statement issued by the Police as self-incriminating laden with blatant lies, falsehood and deception.

    “For the police to say there was a criminal complaint against Barr. Ejiofor bothering on assault and kidnapping four days after the funeral of his brother is most stupid and laughable. Criminal complaint from who? Who did he kidnap, the body of his dead brother

    “Who did he assault, Justice Binta Nyako? Where, when and how did he commit these crimes? The Nigeria Police never wrote to Barr. Ejiofor neither did they invite him to attend their station.

    “This is a black lie. If they did, they should release the call log of the phone they claim they used in calling him. Does the Nigerian Police think the public is as daft as they are?

    “The only reason for this unprovoked criminal invasion with deadly intent is to kill Barrister Ejiofor and to stop him from attending Federal High Court Abuja next month where he has all but defeated the Attorney General in the matter of Federal Government of Nigeria versus IPOB because Nigeria has no case against IPOB.

    “The same strategy of invade and kill doctrine they deployed in Isiama-Afaraukwu the home of our leader on 14 September 2017 a month before he is due in court is what played out in Oraifite yesterday.

    “The Nigeria Police claim two of their officers were killed by IPOB members but there were four dead bodies in the burnt out police vehicle. What any investigative journalist worth his salt should ask is, who are the other two victims, where did they come from and what were they doing in a police van?

    “Answers to these questions will reveal that Nigeria Police Command in Anambra State are unrepentant liars.

    “The truth remains that Nigeria Police and Army went to the home of Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor with the sole purpose to kill him before next month’s court date as is now their tradition.

    “On getting there they opened fire on unarmed civilians as usual and the two men that came out of the house were shot dead instantly.

    “The police carried their dead and dying bodies into their van to conceal evidence and drove off. These are facts backed by evidence Anambra Police cannot deny.

    “It is on record that IPOB remains a peaceful movement therefore this latest desperate attempt by the Nigeria Police to equate our activities with Miyetti Allah terrorist organisation is a waste of time, “the group stated.

  • Onnoghen: Lawyer files suit to stop confirmation of Justice Tanko as CJN

    Onnoghen: Lawyer files suit to stop confirmation of Justice Tanko as CJN

    A lawyer, Malcolm Omirhobo, has dragged the National Judicial Council (NJC) before the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking an order halting the appointment of the acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Tanko Muhammad, as the substantive chief justice.

    The applicant in the suit with number FHC/ABJ/CS/420/2019 alleged that Mr Muhammad availed himself as a tool that was used in the violation of the constitution, especially with regards to the ‘illegal’ removal of the embattled Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Walter Onnoghen.

    President Muhammadu Buhari had sworn in Muhammad as the acting CJN after suspending Onnoghen in January.

    The president, with the consent of the NJC, had last week extended the acting tenure of Muhammad by another three months.

    The suit, which was filed by the plaintiff, has the NJC, the Federal Judicial Service Commission, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Mr Muhammad, The Federal Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Attorney General of the Federation and the Senate as defendants.

    The applicant is seeking the courts’ declaration that the constitution never contemplated suspension or removal from office by an ‘exparte order’ of court as one of the grounds for which the office of the Chief Justice of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can become vacant.

    The applicant also seeks a declaration that the suspension and/or removal of the Chief Justice of Nigeria from office is a shared responsibility of the NJC, the President and the Senate.

    The applicant added that “the President does not have the vires or power under the law to unilaterally suspend and/or remove the Chief Justice of Nigeria from office.”

    He seeks an order restraining the Senate from confirming the appointment of Mr Muhammad as the substantive CJN.

    The suit has been assigned to a judge, Iyang Ekwo, but no date has been fixed for the hearing.

    After his controversial suspension, Onnoghen was convicted by the Code of Conduct Tribunal for false assets declaration. The tribunal ordered his sack from office. It also ruled that he should forfeit his undeclared assets.

    Onnoghen has appealed the ruling.

  • Onnoghen did not resign as CJN – Lawyer

    A lawyer to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, has shed light on the purported resignation of his client.

    Adegboyega Awomolo who is lead counsel to the embattled CJN in his false assets declaration trial said Onnoghen’s decision is a retirement and not a resignation from office.

    Recall that the media was awash of his resignation as CJN on Friday.

    However, the presidency was yet to confirm receipt of the letter as both presidential spokesmen Femi Adesina and Garba Shehu were said to be out of the country on an official assignment.

    He said Onnoghen sent his notice of retirement to President Muhammadu Buhari in line with constitutional provisions.

    What he has done is to send his notice of retirement to the President. And he has done so, in accordance with the provisions of the constitution.

    His position from day one has been that it is only the NJC that can discipline him. Now that the NJC has spoken, out of respect for the NJC and the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria and Nigerian Judiciary, he sent his letter of retirement, not resignation. He never resigned.

    All he has done is to send a letter to the president, saying thank you. I have served this country for about 32 years. I want to retire. That’s all he has done,” Awomolo told Premium Times in an interview.

    Meanwhile, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in a reaction on Friday evening said the CJN’s resignation was an affirmation of the legitimacy of the action earlier taken by President Muhammadu Buhari to suspend the CJN.

    The party said as earlier seen with the Senate President, Bukola Saraki’s asset declaration trail at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) and now the CJN’s trial, “Now, you have seen the head of National Assembly, Senate President, in the dock. Now, you have seen the CJN in the dock. So, one day, we will see a President that also misbehaves in the dock, which now shows that nobody is above the law and that we are all equal before the law.

    So, anybody who finds himself in any position should now begin to look closely at his own actions, knowing full well that today may protect him but tomorrow may expose him.”

    Humble rise to the peak

    Onneghen was born on the Dec. 22, 1950 at Okurike Town, Biase Local Government Area of Cross Rivers.

    He began his primary school education at the Presbyterian Primary School, Okurike Town between 1959 and 1965.

    Before his appointment as the Chief Justice of the Federation, he worked with the Ministry of Justice, Ikeja, Lagos, Ogun, between 1978 and 1979, as the Pupil State Counsel.

    Between 1989 – 1998, he was a High Court Judge of Cross River Judiciary.

    During his time as the High Court Judge of Cross River, he was made the Chairman of Cross River State Armed Robbery and Firm Arms Tribunal and he held the post for 3 years from 1990 – 1993.

    Sometime in 1996 while still holding the post of High Court Judge of Cross River, he was appointed the Chairman, Judicial Enquiry into the Crisis between Students of the University of Calabar and Obufa Esuk Orok Community, Calabar.

    In 1998, he was the Chairman, Failed Banks Tribunal, Ibadan Zone.

    Between 1992 and 2004, he served as the Judge, High Court of Rivers, while from 1998 to 2005, he served as Justice of the Court of Appeal.

    In 2007, Justice Onnoghen played a huge role in 2007 election which saw the Late Umaru Yar’adua as President of Nigeria.

    He had a dissenting judgment that indeed annulled the presidential election. His position was however a minority judgment.

    After being nominated as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria by the Acting President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, he was confirmed by the Senate on March 1, 2017, and sworn in on March 7.

    Suspension and trial at CCT

    Onnoghen’s trials for false assets declaration started when a petition was filed by the civil rights group at the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), alleging that he owned sundry accounts.

    It alleged the accounts were primarily funded through cash deposits made by himself up to as recently as August 10, 2016, which appeared to have been run in a manner inconsistent with financial transparency and the code of conduct for public officials.

    The trial began on Jan. 14 at Code of Conduct Tribunal but Onnoghen was absent.

    Also on Wednesday, the National Judicial Council abstained from considering allegations relating to the assets declaration that were levelled against Onnoghen.

    On Feb. 11, the council set up a preliminary complaints assessment committee to review the responses given to it by Onnoghen, and Muhammad who is acting in his stead.

    Onnoghen is accused of failing to fully declare his assets, while Muhammad is facing allegations of misconduct.

    The NJC said it reconvened and resolved to constitute into the Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee in accordance with Regulation 17 of the National Judicial Council Judicial Discipline Regulations, 2017.

    Tortuous journey to retirement

    Onnoghen’s retirement is coming 51 days after his trial began at the Code of Conduct tribunal on January 14 and 58 days after the petition which birthed the said trial was submitted.

    Onnoghen, who was appointed a justice of the Supreme Court in 2005, had been recommended for the position of Chief Justice of Nigeria on October 6, 2016, by the NJC under its erstwhile leader, Mahmud Mohammed. He was, however, not confirmed by the Senate until March 7, 2017, due to the reluctance of President Muhammadu Buhari to submit his name to the Senate for confirmation.

    He was eventually sworn-in on March 7, 2017, by then Acting President Yemi Osinbajo, after the Senate confirmation. Onnoghen’s appointment as chief justice was billed to expire on December 22, 2020, after he attains the compulsory retirement age of 70 years.

  • Alleged N400mn fraud: Metuh fires SAN, hires new lawyer for defence

    Alleged N400mn fraud: Metuh fires SAN, hires new lawyer for defence

    A new lawyer, Abel Ozioko, on Wednesday announced his appearance before a division of the Federal High Court in Abuja as the new counsel for a former spokesperson of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.

    Metuh is facing a seven-count charge of diversion of N400 million from the office of the former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki.

    The court had earlier on Wednesday discharged the counsel who was representing the defendant in the trial, Onyechi Ikpeazu.

    The court decision to discharge Ikpeazu was as a result of a letter by Metuh dated March 6 and filed March 12, informing the court of his intention to disengage the senior advocate from representing him in the trial.

    During the session on Wednesday, Ikpeazu told the court that Metuh had debriefed them.

    The first defendant wrote a letter debriefing us.”

    According to him, Metuh said he no longer wanted them as the legal team representing him, noting that he has the right to choose his counsel.

    He said he believes we can no longer effectively represent him and that he has a right to choosing,” Ikpeazu told the court.

    If it pleases the court to grant him his constitutional right and discharge me and other counsel in our chambers from further appearing. I apply that we be allowed to withdraw the application.”

    Responding, the second defendant’s counsel, Tochukwu Onwubufor, said: “In my opinion, he should move the application and affidavit of facts, section 349(7 and 8) which ought to be complied with.”

    Onwubufor is the lawyer for Dextra Investment Ltd, the company charged with Metuh in the trial.

    I do not think a counsel is allowed to withdraw by mere affidavits of facts which were filed by counsel to the first defendant. Before a court ceases to act, it must be an order of the court.

    I urge the court to hear the application alongside the affidavits of facts filed.

    The prosecution has filed a counter affidavit and the second defendant (we have also filed a reply. So the issue has been joined.

    In his part, the prosecution counsel, Sylvanus Tahir, said they were on the same page with the second defendant’s counsel.

    Again, Ikpeazu said “a party cannot be forced to move an application which he has withdrawn.”

    Following argument from both counsel, the presiding judge, Abang Okon, made a short ruling.

    The moment a defendant debriefs his counsel, there is nothing a court of law can do.

    He has a right to engage and disengage counsel as he so wishes because it is his fundamental human right to do so.”

    He cited section 36(6c) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, which states that: “Every person who is charged with a criminal offence shall be entitled to – (c) Defend himself in person or by legal practitioners of his own choice.

    Therefore the application filed by Ikpeazu has been overtaken by an event.

    Asking Ikpeazu to argue the motion is no longer of use,” Abang added.

    The court wondered why the legal strategy by Metuh but held that it cannot question the defendant’s decision.

    In any event, I cannot stop the first defendant from presenting who would defend him in court,” the judge said.

    After the ruling, the new lawyer, Ozioko asked for two weeks to enable him to acquaint himself with the matter.

    With the prosecution not objecting to Mr Ozioko’s request, Abang adjourned to March 28 for the continuation of trial on a day-to-day basis.

    Frivolous application for adjournment will not be entertained, Abang added.

  • Judge apologises to lawyers over poor toilet facility in Jos High Court

    Judge apologises to lawyers over poor toilet facility in Jos High Court

    Justice Daniel Longji of a Jos State High Court on Thursday apologized to lawyers over lack of functional toilet facilities it the Jos High Court premise.

    The Judge, apologised to Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), the EFCC Prosecuting Counsel in Sen. Jonah Jang’s N6.3 billion fraud case, pleaded with the Bar to help the Judiciary in the mess it has found itself in.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Jang case was on when the judge suggested a 20 minutes stand down to enable people who want to visit the restrooms to do so.

    Jacobs had agreed with the judge but Longji, told him there were no functional restrooms in the court premises.

    “I have to apologise to you over the none availability of a functional toilet facility in the whole of this High Court premises. The situation here is this bad.

    “You on the Bar, must come to the assistance of the judiciary considering the situation it has found itself in this time around.

    “I can’t imagine that in the whole of this premise, there is no single functional toilet facility that could cater for the people coming here for ligations, ’’ Longji lamented.

    Responding, Chief Mike Ezekhome (SAN), Counsel to Jang, assured the Judge of the Bar’s readiness to assist in the area of raising the matter with the authorities.

    “Sir, we at the Bar are always fighting for you, particularly my very self, I will not stop fighting for the judiciary. For a whole High Court like this to be without a functional toilet facility is very unfortunate.

    “We shall as lawyers take this matter serious to stop the embarrassment and the inconveniences being caused litigants that troop in here for one thing or the other, ’’ Ezekhome assured.

    “I done a lot of write ups and carried out some crusades in my fights for the judiciary. This situation the judge talked about is very unfortunate and uncalled for.’’

    NAN’s findings revealed that virtually all the toilets, lacked running water and can’t be used by anybody. (NAN)

    Speaking to NAN, the Registrar of the Court, Mr Geoffrey Kamyal, said: “we renovated some of the toilets. Another challenge is lack of running water.

    “We are using well water at the High Court premises now.

    “Just as the Judge pointed out, most time it’s the Nigeria Bar Association that fight for the Judiciary for some things to be put right in the Judiciary.

    “Our challenge is that our monthly subventions hardly comes as expected, which usually hinders us from putting somethings right for the good of the people coming around the High Court, ’’ Kamyal explained.

  • [Photo] Vigilante members kill Lawyer hours after being called to bar

    [Photo] Vigilante members kill Lawyer hours after being called to bar

    A Nigerian lawyer, Okeya Adeshina has been reportedly murdered by a vigilante group a few hours after he was called to bar.

    The lawyer who was said to be the son of a prominent Ekiti State politician, graduated from Ekiti State University and Yola Campus of the Nigerian Law School in Adamawa.

    [Photo] Vigilante members kill Lawyer hours after being called to bar

    The Nigerian lawyer who was killed few hours after he was called to bar, had an argument with members of the vigilante group in Kubwa area of the federal capital territory, who accosted him on his way home from a party.

  • Missing certificate: Lawyer approaches court, seeks Buhari's disqualification

    A Lagos-based lawyer, Itesede Okhai, has approached the Federal High Court in Lagos, seeking an order disqualifying President Muhammadu Buhari from contesting in the 2019 presidential election.

    The lawyer, in his suit marked, FHC/L/CS/1765/18, contended that Buhari had not met the legal requirements to stand for election, because the President did not submit his secondary school certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission.

    The lawyer is urging the court to declare that the sworn affidavit which Buhari submitted to INEC, stating that his certificate was in the custody of the Nigerian Army, was not enough.

    Okhai is praying the court to declare Buhari’s sworn affidavit null and void, contending that “it could not stand as a substitute to President Buhari’s certificate or take the place of the evidence of President Buhari’s educational qualification as a requirement and condition precedent in INEC Form CF001.”

    The lawyer wants the court to restrain INEC, which was joined in the suit as the second defendant, from allowing Buhari to contest in the election, having allegedly failed to meet the relevant requirements of the Electoral Act.

    He is seeking a declaration that by the combined provisions of sections 31(1), 2 and 5 of the Electoral Act, Cap 15, 2010, Buhari, having failed to attach his secondary school certificate to the forms he submitted to INEC, was bound to be disqualified from the presidential race.

    In an affidavit personally deposed to by himself, the lawyer said he recalled that Buhari made the same claim in 2014, while seeking to be elected as President, that his certificate was in the custody of the Secretary of the Military Board.

    According to him, in response to Buhari’s claim, the Nigerian Army, through its spokesman, Brig Gen Olaleye Olajide, at a press conference held on January 20, 2015, stated that the Nigerian military was not in possession of Buhari’s certificates evidencing his educational qualification.

    Okhai, in his affidavit, said he “reasonably believed that President Buhari has lied on oath where he claimed that his educational certificates are with the Nigerian Military Board.”

    He urged the court to stop Buhari from contesting in next year’s presidential election.

    The lawsuit, which was filed on Monday, has yet to be assigned to any judge and no date has been fixed.

  • Biafra: Nnamdi Kanu to address supporters today from Jerusalem – Lawyer

    Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, lawyer to the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu on Saturday said the Biafra agitator is alive and will address his supporters today direct from Jerusalem, Israel.
    Ejiofor, who had previously accused the Nigerian Army of abducting Kanu during the September 2017 invasion of his residence in Umuahia, said the video showing him praying in Israel 13 months after he disappeared was authentic.
    Ejiofor, in a statement, said, “This morning (yesterday), I received a direct confirmation from my client, hearing once from him after 13 months in captivity.
    I am very delighted therefore, to use this singular opportunity to announce to the world that my client is the very person seen in the pictures /video. That I can confirm authoritatively.
    Furthermore, the shocking tale of how he made it alive once again will be made public in his scheduled world press broadcast to be beamed live within the next 24 hours.
    The world will now hear from the horse’s mouth, the gory accounts of what happened in my client’s home on the 14th day of September 2017, only tomorrow (today).”
    Meanwhile, a former Aviation Minister, Fani-Kayode while also affirming the authenticity of Kanu’s recent video/pictures in Jerusalem said on Twitter that he “just received a call from my brother Nnamdi Kanu.
    I am delighted that he is alive and well. I commend his strength and courage even as I marvel at the loyalty, resilience and commitment of his lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor and IPOB. We have agreed to work together to VOTE Buhari out.”

  • Court sentences 80-year-old man for killing lawyer

    A Court sitting in Neubrandenburg to the North of Berlin on Tuesday handed down a lengthy sentence to an 80-year-old man who killed a Lawyer.

    The 80-year-old man shot and killed a Lawyer in her office in a dispute over money.

    The court found the man guilty of manslaughter and illegal possession of a firearm, but did not press the original charge of murder.

    The sentence totaled seven years and eight months.

    The man, who was not named under German privacy laws, admitted entering the lawyer’s office on Feb. 1, this year armed with a pistol that he had acquired illegally.

    He told the court that he had been acquainted with the lawyer’s husband and had lent him a sum of 110,000 dollars to set up an import business after German reunification in 1990.

    An attempt to recover the money failed despite a 2004 civil court ruling that the loan was outstanding.

    “He felt abused, lied to and deceived,’’ the judge said. Attempts to talk to the lawyer were in vain.

    After firing the fatal shots, the man fled in a bus and hid the pistol before going shopping and returning to his one-room high-rise apartment in Waren an der Mueritz, a town of some 21,000 inhabitants in the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

    dpa/NAN