Tag: Lawyers

  • NBA condemns trend of lawyers shopping for judgements across Nigeria

    NBA condemns trend of lawyers shopping for judgements across Nigeria

    “The Bench, respectfully, is also not blameless. We certainly concur with the Honourable Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme of the Court of Appeal in her condemnation of the indulgence by some judicial officers of politicians who go round the country shopping for judgments, and who thereby bring the Judiciary to public ridicule.

    The Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, has alleged that some of its senior members are yielding themselves to politicians to be used as willing tools to wantonly abuse the judicial process.

    The legal body, in a statement it issued late in the night on Monday, said it observed with dismay, the unfortunate and recurring trend of contradictory court decisions and orders, especially among courts of coordinate jurisdiction, typically arising from ex parte applications and almost always in political matters.

    “Regrettably, we have begun to receive worrying news of recurring contradictory decisions by our courts, based on the apparently indiscriminate grant of orders and counter-orders, in a way that evokes memories of those eerie and unwanted dark days.

    “Examples include the orders relating to the nomination of candidates by political parties for the forthcoming gubernatorial elections in Anambra State, especially by the three major political parties, All Progressives Congress (APC), All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    “An equally embarrassing situation is also playing out in respect of the PDP leadership crisis that has seen not less than three different rulings, all by courts of coordinate jurisdiction, in circumstances that leave a lot to be desired.

    “While the NBA will continue to stay away from the political ramifications and machinations involved in these matters, it is self-evident that these developments in our courts are antithetical to the actualisation of the just society and independent judiciary that we all aspire to, and they run contrary to everything we teach and hold dear as a profession.

    “Indeed, these aberrations do nothing but bring the Judiciary and the entire system of administration of justice to ridicule, and certainly erode the authority of the hallowed offices that our judicial officers occupy.

    “If the society cannot trust the judiciary and the legal profession to safeguard our democracy, what then is the justification for the respect that the society has for us?”, the NBA queried.

    According to the legal association, it has evidence that some of its senior members acted in breach of rules of professional conduct for legal practitioners, by assisting politicians to procure ex-parte orders.

    Consequently, the NBA leadership said it would urgently seek an audience with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Ibrahim Muhammad.

    “To say the least, there is, in the NBA’s view, prima facie evidence of the breach of the Rules of Professional

    Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 (“RPC”), made pursuant to the Legal Practitioners Act, by the lawyers responsible for the unrelenting embarrassment of our Judiciary in political matters.

    “Rule 1 of the RPC which requires a lawyer to uphold and observe the rule of law, promote and foster the cause of justice, maintain a high standard of professional conduct, and not engage in any conduct which is unbecoming of a legal practitioner is clearly being violated in these cases.

    “By the issuance of this statement, the NBA confirms unequivocally that it will not stand by and watch a ridiculing of the profession and the justice administration system by a handful of its members and will be considering its deterrence options in this regard.

    “The Bench, respectfully, is also not blameless. We certainly concur with the Honourable Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme of the Court of Appeal in her condemnation of the indulgence by some judicial officers of politicians who go round the country shopping for judgments, and who thereby bring the Judiciary to public ridicule.

    “To that end, the NBA will urgently seek audience with the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria to address this issue holistically.

    “In deference to the revered office of our courts, the NBA shall refrain from further comments on this matter in the meantime.

    “I will enlist the support of the Chairman of the NBA Judiciary Committee, Dr Babatunde Ajibade, SAN as well as the Chairpersons of the NBA Section of Legal Practice (NBA-SLP) and NBA Section on Public Interest and Development Law (NBA-SPIDEL), Mr Oluwaseun Abimbola, SAN and Dr Monday Ubani for this proposed engagement.

    “In conclusion, the NBA, as the prime defender of the integrity and independence of the Judiciary, cannot and will not be a spectator whilst our hard-earned democracy is threatened by the venal acts of a few.

    “This is particularly so as the nation approaches its next round of general elections. It can no longer be business as usual, further read the statement signed by NBA President, Mr Olumide Akpata.

  • Lawyers, FCT residents differ on whether man can be guilty of raping wife

    Lawyers, FCT residents differ on whether man can be guilty of raping wife

    Some Abuja-based lawyers, on Friday, expressed divergent views committed by himself upon his lawful wife under the Nigerian law.

    The lawyers, who made this known in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja, said the spousal or marital exemption principle implies that by mutual matrimonial consent and contract the wife had given up her herself unto her husband, which she cannot retract.

    They, however said, when abuse and violence is applied by spouses during intercourse, it falls under domestic violence and assault.

    Mr Maxwell Opara, a lawyer told NAN that a wife can only talk about not rape.

    ”A man cannot rape his wife and the woman cannot rape her husband.

    ”Rape occurs when there is non consensual sex with someone that is not your wife but you cannot force your wife against her consent because it is the man’s matrimonial right, the woman can say her husband assaulted her and on that ground has to go an extra length to prove it.

    “If the woman cannot withstand the incessant demand for sex from her husband, she can divorce him and they go their separate ways.

    “The inability to consummate the marriage by either the husband or wife is a solid ground to divorce.

    “Underthe matrimonial law, marriage is predicated on consummation and once there is an iota of disaggrement and denial, there is no marriage.

    ” Except there is a medical proof for the woman not to consummate for a certain period of time, in that regard, the woman’s life is at stake, ” Okpara said.

    The legal practitioner added that refusal to consummate can lead to bigamy which is a crime and when the wife refuses to submit, it can lead to extramarital affairs.

    ” In this case, the wife can take her husband up for bigamy which is another ground for dissolution of marriage.

    ” In religious law , the Bible also says the man should love his wife and the woman should submit to her husband likewise in customary law the woman is under the man.

    ” There should be mutual understanding in marriage, a man should know when his wife is tired after work likewise the woman, because when the couple is not in the mood, both would not respond to expectations, ” he said.

    Also speaking, Chukwuma Nwachukwu, a legal practitioner said:”rape is having unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman without her consent and with consent, if the consent is obtained by force or by undue influence by making her drunk or giving her a drug to suppress her the opportunity to give free consent or by impersonating the husband.

    ” Under Nigerian law , especially in the criminal code a husband cannot rape his wife because by the institution of marriage, a woman is deemed to have freely given her consent for sex with her husband.

    ” There may be other offences that is not rape and is sexually related for example a man can violently assault his wife in the course of having sex or attempting to have sex.

    ” In 2015 a law called the Violence Against Persons Prohibitions Act (VAPPA) was created , under this new law a man can actually rape his wife.

    ” Before now, one of the major ingredients of rape is that there must have been penetration of the penis into the vagina of a woman, if there is no penetration there is no rape under Nigerian laws.

    ” However because of the emergence of various species of sexual act, the VAPPA also redefined what will constitute the offence of rape under Nigerian law.

    ”For example, under the previous law, a man cannot be raped because he cannot be penetrated but under VAPPA, a man can be raped.

    ” VAPPA also creates the offence of rape by a husband which is called spousal rape.

    ” So when a woman says no, the husband has to stop , in the process of forcing her you have actually raped her because the basic thing is the man has applied violence which is against the essence of VAPPA.

    ” Spousal rape means that abuse and violence had been applied in the process and VAPPA totally outlaws any sort of violence against a person which makes it an offence under the present state of Nigeria law,” Nwachukwu said.

    Also, Tosin Ojaomo, also a lawyer said marital or spousal rape is not recognised under Nigerian Penal provisions because it sees the husband and wife as one and marriage bounds the man and the woman together.

    ” Under the common law, a man can rape a wife when she doesn’t give her consent to sex but not under Nigerian law.

    ” Marital rape can only be looked at under domestic violence because domestic violence is recognised by law and these issues can come under domestic violence and not rape.

    ” It is assumed that there is an implied consent at the point of marriage, there must be an oath taken during the period of consummation of marriage that you will be together for better for worse and so many things.

    ” Even though there is a limit, but when it comes to issue of sexual relationship, our law tries to protect the issue of marriage.

    ” The issue of domestic violence among the couple can be reported because the Nigerian law recognises it. If a man wants to have sex with his wife and applies violence that would be deemed as domestic violence and not marital rape because the couple are legally bound by law, ” Ojaomo said.

    Sir Steve Odiase, a legal practitioner said, married couples are to have access to each other unconditionally adding that for the issue of rape to emanate from the relationship that is statutory bound is impossible.

    ” At best its an assault, the husband can be said to assault the wife if consent is not granted expressly and the husband forces himself on the woman.

    ” They are bound by law to be one and they have unfettered advances on eachother that is why the woman can also tell her husband when she needs him , it is supposed to be unhindered if there are no impediments in the marriage,” Odiase said.

    Another lawyer, Moses Ugwummadu, said that by law in marriage a woman should always give in to her husband at all times but when she is not disposed for one reason or the other she has a right to say no.

    ” If she denies the man his conjugal right, the man can go to court to restore his legal rights instead of taking laws into his hands and forcing her, ” Ugwummadu said.

    Also speaking to a trader, Saidat Abdulaziz, said sex should not be forced between married couples adding that some go as far as threatening the life of the wife in the process.

    ” It is very difficult to report marital rape in Nigeria , because only few people would support the woman, majority would support the man because they feel it is a family thing but for me my no is no, if I have to go to the police station because of sex, then so be it.

    ” I grew up in an environment where a couple always fought over sex, the man beats his wife and when you ask them the cause of the fight they find it difficult to say.

    ” If it happens once and he apologises the wife can forgive him but when it keeps reoccuring , the necessary action needs to be taken before the wife dies in the process and if it results to him being jailed for it, let him learn the hard way, ” she said.

    Mr Emeka Ndubuisi, another trader said rape is possible in marriage as far as force is applied adding that it is a family issue to be settled at home.

    ” If you go to the police to report marital rape, you would be asked to go home and settle it.In my 11 years in marriage I cannot force my wife into having sex, if I ask and she is willing, ” I collect am with good heart”, ” Ndubuisi said.

    Mrs Funke Benson, a businesswoman said she does not believe in marital rape saying a man should not force his wife for sex because it is his conjugal right.

    ” When couples are not in the mood, there should be an understanding between them because after they agree to be husband and wife, they are suppose to be one and in the Nigerian culture and in Christianity the woman is suppose to be submissive and is under her husband, ”

  • Photos: Professors, lawyers conduct exams, interviews for LG chairmanship aspirants in Kaduna

    Photos: Professors, lawyers conduct exams, interviews for LG chairmanship aspirants in Kaduna

    Local Government chairmanship aspirants under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kaduna State were on Wednesday subjected to compulsory written examination and oral interview.

    According to reports, the examination and interview, which lasted for hours at the state capital on Wednesday, were superintended by 17-man panel including four Professors, several PhD holders and lawyers.

    This is the first time in history of Kaduna State such exercise would be conducted to screen political party aspirants.

    Over 100 aspirants stormed Stonehedge Hotel, venue of the examination and screening to participate.

    One of the aspirants said the exercise was thorough as they were made to make photocopies of their credentials for the panelists, who took time to scrutinise them and ask probing questions.

    It was also gathered the aspirants were told to write biographical essay on their lives, schools attended, work experiences, places lived or visited within Kaduna state, Nigeria and abroad.

    The essence of the exercise, According to a report by The Nation, was to weed out those with questionable credentials and deficiencies that have the tendencies of exposing the party to post-election litigations.

    TheNewsGuru.com, TNG gathered that all the incumbent local government chairmen are seeking reelection except chairman of Kachia Local Government Area.

  • Lawyers shun courts, protest killings in Anambra

    Lawyers shun courts, protest killings in Anambra

    Countless lawyers in Anambra State on Monday boycotted courts in the area.

    They paraded to Government House from the Judiciary Headquarters, Awka (about one and a half kilometers) to protest the spate of killings in the state by gunmen.

    They noted that one of their members, Frank Onwuachi, was kidnapped and killed in recent terror attacks on the state.

    TheNewsGuru recalls that no fewer than six policemen, four naval officers, two prison guards and others had been killed in the state within a week.

    Four police stations and several security formations in the state had also been attacked, patrol vehicles burnt, while arms and ammunition were carted away by hoodlums.

    The situation, the state governor, Willie Obiano, said in a state broadcast on Sunday, had made him to call for a strengthening of security personnel from the Army, Police, and the Directorate of State Services.

    Protesting on Monday, the legal practitioners under the umbrella of Committee of Chairmen and Secretaries of the Nigerian Bar Association condemned the high rate of insecurity in the area.

    The lawyers said they would boycott courts in the state for three days as part of their complaints over the killing of their members and others in the state.

    The chairman of the Onitsha bar, Onyechi Ononye, said lawyers in the state could no longer go to court freely due to the high rate of insecurity in the state.

    He called on the governor to deploy security operatives to courts and other parts of the state to secure lives and property.

    “Our member was kidnapped and killed the other day. Some security formations were attacked and operatives were killed while their weapons were carted away,” Ononye added.

    Responding on behalf of the state governor, the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Solo Chukwulobelu, said the situation is saddening and alarming, but added that government was on top of it.

     

  • Federal High Court shortlists 34 lawyers for appointment as judges

    Federal High Court shortlists 34 lawyers for appointment as judges

    The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court Justice John Tsoho has shortlisted 34 lawyers from five states from which six will be selected for appointment as judges.

    The states are: Niger, 10 applicants: Kano, six applicants; Katsina, six applicants; Yobe, six applicants; and Osun, six applicants.

    Justice Tsoho disclosed this in a March 8, 2021 circular to all of the court’s serving judges, seen by The Nation on Thursday.

    The serving justices were directed to state their objections to the list, if any, within 10 days.

    The letter was titled, RE: appointment of six (6) additional judges for the Federal High Court Bench.

    It reads: “In continuation of the process for the appointment of Judges to the Federal High Court Bench, Your Lordships will find attached shortlisted candidates and their addresses from the five states earlier specified for consideration and if found fit, for appointment as Judges of the Federal High Court.

    “Your Lordships are hereby enjoined to indicate your objections, if any, to the appointment of any candidate within 10 (ten) days of this Circular letter. Please treat as urgent.”

    The nominees, their states and addresses are,

    Niger State –

    Chiroma Moses Gamzhi – Director of Public Prosecution Ministry of Justice, Niger State; Bala Khalifa-Mahammed Usman: Acting Director. Civil Litigation, Ministry of Justice, Niger State; Jibo Maryam Daso: Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation), High Court of Justice, Minna, Niger State; Ojimi Rachel Dufia: Director, Legislative Drafting and Legal Services Osun State Ministry of Justice Osogbo, Osun State; Musa Suleiman Liman: Private Practitioner, Summit Chambers, No. 2, Muazu Mohammed Road, Minna, Niger State; Baba Alhaji Saidu: Asst. Director, Fed. Min of Justice, Abuja; Fati Suleman Takuma: Director, Public Relations, High Court of Justice, Minna, Niger State; Garafini Ahmed Abdulrahman: Chief Magistrate III, High Court of Justice, Minna, Niger State; Nasiru Muazu: Director of Probate, High Court of Justice, Minna; Murtala Muhammed Bala Ibrahim: State Senior Magistrate, High Court of Justice, Minna.

    Kano State –

    Mukhtar Garba Dandago: Chief Magistrate 1, High Court of Justice, Kano; Ahmad G. Mohammed: Chief Studies Fellow, National Judicial Institute Abuja; Musa Ahmad: Chief Magistrate, High Court of Justice, Kano; Binta Mansur Mahmoud: Chief Magistrate, High Court of Justice, Kano, Kano; Hanif Sanusi Yusuf: Deputy Chief Registrar, High Court of Justice, Kano, Kano State; Kyauta Abdullah: Chief Magistrate II, High Court of Justice, Kano.

    Katsina State –

    Aminu Garba: Asst. Director Legal Drafting, Ministry of Justice Katsina, Katsina State; Umar Abdur-Rahman: Director Civil Litigation High Court of Justice, Katsina, Katsina State; Abdulmumeen Nuradeen: Chief Magistrate, High Court of Justice, Katsina: Halima Lawal Bagiwa: Assistant Director Ministry of Justice, Katsina State; Aliyu Amina Mohammad: Principal Registrar, Federal High Court, Abuja; Nasiru Salele: Deputy Chief State Counsel EFCC Kaduna.

    Yobe State –

    Emmanuel Gakko: Chief Registrar, Federal High Court, Abuja; Mohammed Adamu Jajere: Chief Magistrate 1, High Court of Justice, Yobe; Chief State Counsel Federal Capital Territory: Mohammed Garba Bawa; Chief State Counsel Federal Capital Territory Administration, Area 11, Garki, Abuja; Mustapha Wakil: Deputy Chief Registrar Sharia Court of Appeal Yobe; Usman Lukman Nuhu: Assistant Lecturer, Yobe State University and Aisha Ahmed Fika Mohammed: Senior Registrar Court of Appeal, Abuja.

    Osun –

    Ajibade Bolatito Florence (Mrs) Chief Registrar, High Court of Justice, Akure, Ondo State; Ayilara Olusegun Ayodele, Ph.D: Chief Magistrate, High Court of Justice, Osogbo, Osun State; Olakunle Yusuff Private Practitioner Lahai-Roi Chambers, Suite B05, Tsukunda House, Plot 1446, beside ECOWAS, along Church Gate, CBD, Abuja: Oladigbolu Abidemi – Monday Private Practitioner Legalmind Chambers, 11th Floor, Wing C, Western House, 8/10 Broad Street, Lagos: Justice Fagbenle Emmanuel Olusegun – Former Chief Justice of the High Court, Republic of Gambia, 2015-2017. ¢/O: Kanu G. Agabi (SAN) & Associates, Trinity House, behind Fed. Min of Works, Mabushi Abuja: and Abodunde Hazrat Babalakin-Are – Private Practitioner – 11, Ramotu Oluwakemi Street, Median Estate, Gbagada, Lagos.

  • Severe sanctions awaits lawyers who engage in unprofessional conduct – CJN

    Severe sanctions awaits lawyers who engage in unprofessional conduct – CJN

    Justice Tanko Mohammad, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), said on Monday that lawyers who engaged in unprofessional conduct during court proceedings would be sanctioned.

    Mohammad was represented by Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour, while marking the 2020/2021 legal year and swearing-in the 72 newly conferred 72 Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN).

    He appealed to lawyers, particularly the young ones to always observe all court rules and not mislead their clients for pecuniary gains.

    “Apart from the mode of dressing which I have occasionally complained about, the conduct of some of them within and outside the courtrooms call for serious concern. ” Some have turned the court premises to press interview centres where they cast all manner of aspersions on judicial officers, especially when judgments do not favour them.

    “Henceforth, severe sanctions will be meted out on them, therefore, they should always show the ability and capacity to counsel clients well.” He said that obedience of lawful court orders has no alternative in any society.

    “We must respect and observe all the tenets of an enduring democracy. Nigeria is not a lawless society and no one, irrespective of his or her status, should turn it to one. ”

    Most times, some persons, who by sheer stroke of providence find themselves in positions of authority, flagrantly disobey lawful court orders, and even boast about it. “Such acts will henceforth no be condoned. In fact, they will be met with severe consequences and we must therefore extinguish such raging fire before it consumes us all”.

    According to him, ‘the Correctional Centres are not there for decoration, such literally incorrigible and obstinate elements in our mist must be tutored in those centres to deter the several others eagerly waiting in the to embark on such inglorious expedition. ”

    The court will not only bark but will bite harder and deeper too,” he warned. The CJN also added that the apex court in the 2019/2020 legal year had a total of 908 cases, comprising of motions and appeals.

    “Out of the number, we heard 497 civil, 168 criminal and 35 political matters, thus amounting to a total of 700 motions. ”

    The court also considered a total number of 208 appeals, being 134 civil, 52 criminal and 22 political appeals and also, a total of 189 judgments were given within the legal year under review”.

    He also noted the apex court disposed of 52 corruption and financial crime cases, the court of appeal, 121 cases, Federal High Court, 19, FCT High Court 10 cases and all state High Courts, 188 cases.

    All the speakers present called for collective efforts for an improved and respectable judicial system.

    The speakers included Abubakar Malami, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice represented by the Solicitor General, Dayo Akpata, SAN, and Prof. B. O Nwabueze, SAN, who represented the body of SANs. Others are Olumide Akpata, President, Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) and Obafemi Adewale who spoke on behalf of the New Senior Advocates of Nigeria

  • Court remands two lawyers in EFCC custody for ‘rigging 2018 NBA elections’

    Court remands two lawyers in EFCC custody for ‘rigging 2018 NBA elections’

    A Federal High Court in Lagos Thursday remanded two lawyers, Sarah Ajibola and John Demide, in Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) custody, following their arraignment for allegedly rigging the August 2018 Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) national elections.

    Justice Chuka Obiozor ordered that they remain with the anti-graft agency for seven days in order to fulfill their bail terms, a failure of which they will be transferred to the custody of Nigerian Correctional Services (NCoS).

    The anti-graft agency claimed that Ajibola, and Demide manipulated the election in favour of Mr. Paul Usoro SAN, who was elected 29th NBA President in 2018.

    Mr. Usoro polled 4,509 votes to defeat his other contenders, Okafor Obi, and Ernest Ojukwu, who got 4,423 as well as 3,313 votes in the just concluded election.

    One of the candidates, Mr. Ojukwu, condemned the election saying it was characterised by fraud.

    The agency filed the 14-count charge, marked FHC/L/118c/2020, against the defendant’s last May 5.

    EFCC counsel, Mrs Bilikisu Buhari Bala, told the court that the defendants committed the offences in August 2018.

    She alleged that they conspired and altered personal details including email addresses and phone numbers of about 1004 eligible voters for the elections, with the intention that such inauthentic data will be acted upon as genuine during the said election.

    Some of the voters’ names allegedly falsified were: Gabriel Abijo Oladipo with Supreme Court of Nigeria (SCN) No. 043280; Uthman Adeleye Oluwaseun with SCN No. 088449; David Anakor SCN No. 015233; Chiagoziem Bethel Aninilu, SCN No. 114439 and Bankole Isaac Toyin with SCN no. 024643.

    The two lawyers were alleged to have used a smoke model on IP address 169.159.65.190 to commit the electoral fraud.

    The offences, according to the prosecutor, contravened and were punishable under sections 27(1)(b), 13, 22(2), 22(3) of the Cybercrime (Prohibition Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015.

    Ajibola and Demide pleaded not guilty.

    Their counsel, N. E. Ogeibe and Deborah Ogundele, prayed the court to admit them to bail “in the most liberal terms.”

    He told the court that Ajibola was a senior lawyer of over 15 years, and would neither jump bail nor tamper with evidence for the charge.

    In a bench ruling, Justice Obiozor admitted each defendant to bail in the sum of N500, 000 with one surety each.

    The judge while adjourned till April 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, and 22, 2021, for trial.

  • 378 Lawyers sign petition to strip Buhari’s AGF, Malami of SAN title over ‘sole’ amendment of RPC

    378 Lawyers sign petition to strip Buhari’s AGF, Malami of SAN title over ‘sole’ amendment of RPC

    The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami might have bitten more than he can chew over the recent the amendment to the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) for Legal Practitioners 2007 by his office.

    This is even so as lawyers under the auspices of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) begun the collection of signatures to strip Malami of the Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) tittle over the amendment to the rules. They accused the minister of individually embarking on the amendment of the conduct without consultation with relevant stakeholders.

    The association insisted no alteration has been made to the rules and therefore directed its members to ignore a gazette on the issue while it engages the Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, in talks over the matter.

    The controversial gazette which was issued after the controversial amendment to the rules abolishes the payment of legal fees by lawyers.

    The instrument also removes the requirement for NBA stamp and seal on court processes.

    NBA argued in a statement on Sunday by its President, Olumide Akpata, that the gazette or instrument was crafted to weaken its powers.

    The stamps and seals are sold to lawyers at N4,000 for 72 pieces and given to them upon payment of NBA dues.

    Without the stamp, a lawyer cannot submit any document or letter in the court.

    The sale of the stamp and seal is one of the major sources of NBA’s revenue.

    Thus with the coming of the gazette, the use of the stamps is no longer necessary.

    In the statement, Akpata pointed to the Legal Practitioners Act which states that only a resolution of the Bar council, comprising the AGF, attorneys-general of the 36 states of the federation and 20 members of the NBA can issue or amend rules of professional conduct for legal practitioners.

    Akpata accused Malami of amending the rules without taking cognizance of the other parties that are legally supposed to be involved in the process.

    Akpata assured lawyers that he had begun speaking with Malami on the issue and would update them in the coming days.

    As at the last check, about 378 lawyers have signed the petition to strip Malami of the title of SAN.

    The petition registered by Barrister Izu Aniagu on change.org, claimed among others that Malami unilaterally deleted the provisions of the RPC which provides for stamp and seal as well as bar practice fee for government lawyers.

    According to Izu, the AGF had no such power to do so.

     

  • ‘NNBA’ lawyers write AGF, seek independent recognition

    ‘NNBA’ lawyers write AGF, seek independent recognition

    A new body of lawyers, the New Nigerian Bar Association (NNBA), has formally written and notified the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, of its existence.

    According to reports, the new association said its formation, last Thursday, followed the alleged failure of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to uphold a national unity in its recent decisions.

    Last Thursday, two Kaduna-based lawyers – Nuhu Ibrahim and Abdulbasit Suleiman – announced the NNBA’s formation, following NBA’s withdrawal of an Annual General Conference (AGC) invitation to Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, among other grievances.

    They informed the AGF of their plans in an August 28 letter signed by Ibrahim as Convener 1 and Suleiman as Convener 2.

    The letter to the AGF reads in part: “We are pleased to inform you of the formation of a new Association of Lawyers as above captioned.

    “The formation of the new Association has become imperative and expedient especially flowing from the activities, disposition and most recently, the decision of the Nigerian Bar Association-NEC (National Executive Committee), which apparently failed to take into consideration our national interests and particularly do not promote the unity of our indissoluble country, Nigeria.

    “Sir, the New Nigerian Bar Association believes in the ideals that bound our country together as echoed in our National Anthem: ‘The Labours of our heroes past shall never be in vain.’

    “You are, however, to be further informed that work is in progress with regards to all the nitty-gritty of the formation of an association such as this to which we shall keep you updated.”

    Both men had said they and other like-minds were consulting with “very senior lawyers of Northern Nigeria extraction and those practising therein with the view to constituting the (board of) trustees and for purposes of fixing a date for formal inauguration of the association”.

    Meanwhile, the NBA President Olumide Akpata has set up an Electoral Audit and Reforms Committee to audit the body’s 2016, 2018 and 2020 elections.

    The committee, headed by Ayo Akintunde (SAN), is expected to also recommend reforms for future electoral systems and processes.

    Akpata, who was sworn into office for a two-year term last Friday, stated this yesterday in a series of tweets on his Twitter handle.

    The NBA is facing threats to its unity, following unresolved issues on the credibility of its national officers’ elections on July 29 and 30, 2020.

    The NBA leadership had been dominated by Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) until Akpata, 47, caused an upset and won the presidential race by a landslide.

    He defeated two SANs – Dr. Babatunde Ajibade and Mr. Dele Adesina – to become the first elected non-SAN president of the NBA in 22 years.

    But Adesina faulted the process, alleging that the election was manipulated.

    The NBA Board of Trustees (BoT) agreed that the election was not perfect.

  • BREAKING: Electoral Committee officially announces Olumide Akpata as new NBA President

    BREAKING: Electoral Committee officially announces Olumide Akpata as new NBA President

    Nigerian lawyers have elected Mr. Olumide Akpata as the next President of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA. The announcement was made at 12:56a.m., on Thursday, by Chairman of the NBA Electoral Committee, Taiwo Taiwo(SAN).

    Akpata won the election with over 50 percent of the total votes cast. His rivals for the office of NBA President were Deacon Dele Adesina(SAN) and Dr. Babatunde Ajibade (SAN).

    The NBA election, which commenced at 11 pm on Wednesday, ended at 11 pm on Thursday.

    Other winners are Mr. John Martin for NBA first Vice President; Second Vice President, Mr. Adeyemo Kazeem; General Secretary, Mrs Joyce Oduah; Assistant Secretary, Uchenna Nwadialo; Mr. Olukunle Edun, Welfare Secretary; Dr. Rapulu Nduka, Publicity Secretary and Assistant Publicity Secretary, Mr. Naza Afam. Olumide Akpata is a Senior Partner and Head of the Corporate and Commercial Practice Group at Templars Law Firm.

    Meanwhile, Dele Adesina, a candidate in the just concluded election had earlier petitioned the electoral committee of the association, alleging gross manipulation in the polls.

    In the petition addressed to Taiwo Taiwo, chairman, electoral committee of the NBA, Adesina claimed the ongoing poll is being marred by over-voting, disenfranchisement of some eligible voters and non-compliance with the provisions of the NBA constitution.

    He said the verified voters’ list was only published about five hours to the commencement of voting contrary to the provision of the NBA constitution (2015) as amended, which provided that the list be released not later than 28 days before the election.

    He also said the list contained 86 “names of lawyers under the subheading international diaspora” which is also a clear violation of association’s constitution.

    Adesina said over 4000 names of lawyers on the list were not ascribed to any branch of the NBA while many others found their names in branches they do not belong.