Tag: Mike Ozekhome

  • Okorocha engages five SANs, files fundamental human rights enforcement suit against EFCC, AGF

    Former governor of Imo State, Rochas Okorocha, through five Senior Advocates of Nigeria, has filed fundamental human rights enforcement suit before a Federal High Court in Abuja, against EFCC and Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

     

    The five lawyers representing the former governor are Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), Okey Amaechi (SAN), Solomon Umor (SAN), Ola Olanipekun (SAN) and Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

     

    In the suit filed by Ozekhome, the former governor have asked the court to declare the invasion of his residence by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission illegal and unconstitutional.

     

    Ozekhome’s suit came some hours after his appearance before a Federal High Court in Abuja where he pleaded not guilty to the N2.9bn corruption charges brought against him by the EFCC.

     

    Ozekhome wants a declaration that the siege on Okorocha’s residence at No.3 Nyasa Close, Mississippi, off Ontario Crescent on May 24 2022, without any legal justification, thereby denying him his constitutional right to privacy, was illegal.

     

    He also wants an order of the court directing the respondents to tender apology in at least three national newspapers.

     

    Okorocha, who is the lawmaker representing Imo West Senatorial District in the National Assembly, also demanded N1bn damages from the Federal Government for the May 24, 2022 invasion of his Abuja residence.

    Okorocha
    Rochas Okorocha

     

    Earlier, Okorocha was, in the 17 counts, accused of diverting N2.9bn from Imo State Government House Accounts and that of Imo State Local Government Joint accounts to private companies.

     

    The alleged offence was said to have been perpetrated by Okorocha and one Anyim Inyerere with the use of their private companies between 2014 and 2016 when he held sway as the Governor of Imo State.

     

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports that Okorocha pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

     

    Shortly after the taking of plea, EFCC counsel, Gbolahan Latona asked the judge for an adjournment to enable him to assemble his witnesses that will testify during trial.

     

    He informed the court that 15 witnesses have been arranged to testify him and that most of the witnesses are outside the court jurisdiction because of the peculiar nature of the charge.

     

    Okorocha’s counsel, Okey Amaechi, told the court that he had filed application for bail of his client and had also served same on the EFCC.

     

    He attempted to argue the application but was opposed by the anti-graft agency which claimed that it intends to file counter affidavit against the bail issued.

     

    Although, the EFCC lawyer sought adjournment to June 1 for arguments on bail, Justice Ekwo ruled that he would take all the bail applications on May 31 and directed EFCC to file its opposition within time.

     

    Justice Inyang Ekwo subsequently ordered Okorocha’s further detention till May 31 when his bail application would be argued.

     

    See below Okorocha’s fundamental human rights enforcement suit:

    Okorocha

    Okorocha

  • Why Nnamdi Kanu cannot change clothes – DSS

    Why Nnamdi Kanu cannot change clothes – DSS

    The Department of State Services (DSS) has explained why the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu is not allowed to change his clothes.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the Director of Legal Services of the DSS gave the explanation at the resumed trial of Kanu on Wednesday.

    “My Lord, clothes that were brought for the defendant had lion’s head embroiled on them, and the defendant can’t wear clothes with a lion’s head.

    “Clothes with lion’s head offend the standard operating procedures of the SSS,” the secret service’s lawyer said.

    Recall that in December 2021, Justice Binta Nyako had ordered that Kanu be allowed to change his outfit before his next appearance in court.

    However, contrary to the order made by Justice Binta, Kanu appeared at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday with him wearing his regular Fendi outfit.

    It was after Mike Ozekhome, counsel to the defendant complained to the court that the DSS gave the explanation.

    When asked the type of cloth he prefers to wear, Kanu responded by saying: “I want to wear the clothes of my people, “Isi Agu”.

    However, the court refused his request but asked the DSS to provide him with his eyes glasses, which his lawyers said was taken away from him.

    Meanwhile, the Prosecution Counsel, Shuaibu Labaran, informed the court that the defence counsel had filed and served him with two applications, which he had responded accordingly.

    He added that the first application is seeking an order quashing the 15-count amended charge levelled against Kanu and the other one seeking his bail.

    In his submissions, counsel to Nnamdi Kanu, Mike Ozekhome also complained to the court that thrice, Kanu’s younger brother has been refused access to DSS facility where Kanu was detained.

    Ozekhome said he has an application that basically seeks the quashing, striking out, and dismissing of the 15-count amended charge against Kanu for being incompetent and denying the court of jurisdiction to entertain the 15-count amended charge.

    The application, with 34 grounds, and supported by 36-paragraph affidavit, Ozekhome said, also seeks for an order acquitting and discharging Kanu for want of jurisdiction and defective, baseless and incompetent charges.

    The matter was then adjourned to April 8 to rule on Kanu’s applications to quash the charge.

    Mr Kanu is accused of various offences, including treasonable felony and terrorism, offences he allegedly committed in the course of his separatist campaigns.

  • I humbly disagree with Obasanjo and his oily thesis – Mike Ozekhome

    I humbly disagree with Obasanjo and his oily thesis – Mike Ozekhome

    Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mike Ozekhome has expressed disagreement with former President Olusegun Obasanjo over his stance on the oil and gas of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Ozekhome expressed his disagreement with theformer President in a statement made available to newsmen on Thursday.

    Ozekhome in the statement stressed that the Niger Delta region has been repressed, suppressed, marginalized and neglected enough, and that Obasanjo, more than any other person, knows this very well.

    The statement reads: “Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has theorized that the oil and gas found in the Niger Delta region belong to the federal government, and not to the oil-bearing communities.

    “Legally speaking, Obasanjo can be said to be correct, because he was part and parcel of successive military juntas that cleverly and systematically inserted expropriatory and inhuman laws concerning ownership of oil and gas into our statute books.

    “But, does that make such laws right or justifiable? No. I think not.bEx president Obasanjo should be told in vsry clear terms that there is such an overriding principle of law which goes with the maxim of “quic quid plantatatur solo solo cedit”.

    “This literally means that whoever owns the land owns everything on top of it. Any extant constitutional or statutory provisions ( such as those apparently referred to by Obasanjo) that run contrary to this commonsensical common law principle are therefore nothing but bad, immoral, exproriatory and exploitative laws.

    “Help me inform Obasanjo that Nigeria operates a federal system of government, and that federalism is fiscal and plural. One of the major attributes of federalism is that it ensures that regions, sub-national or federating units develop according to their pace and needs, using the God-given resources that are available to such units. They pay tax to the central government.

    “Help me inform President Obasanjo that a law that literally steals the resources of a people, punishing them with destruction of their only available aquatic and agrarian life, even though in the statute books, is a bad, aberrant and obnoxious law.

    “Help me tell Obasanjo that in the USA, since oil was discovered in 1859,(a country whose Presidentialism and federalism we ape after), oil and gas are not owned by the American Federal government, but by the surface owners; while oil and gas offshore are owned either by states or federal government.

    “Help me remind Obasanjo that before the January 15, 1967 first military putsch led by Major Kaduna Nzeogwu Chukwuma, neither the cotton, groundnut and hides and skin obtainable in the North, the cocoa grown in the West, Palm produce produced in the East; nor the rubber and timber that existed in the then Midwest, were said to belong to the federal government. They belonged to the regions that took a lion 50% share, while paying tax to the Federal government at the centre. What has changed? Nothihg, I believe.

    “Help me remind Obasanjo to remember history, and that the major reason his 2005 Political Reform Conference failed was because of the rancor and rockus generated by the thorny and still unsolved controversy of resource control.He should remember that this led the South South delegates to stage a walkout from the conference. I was not only a Civil Society delegate, I was actually the head of the Civil Society unit that drafted our final committee report and recommendations.

    “Obasanjo should therefore not have dismissed such a festering thorny issue as oil and gas and bleeding oil-bearing communities with a wave of the hand in a most provocative and cavalier manner.

    “The 1960 independence Constitution and the 1963 Republican Constitution had actually activated true fiscal federalism, after the 1957-1958 Willinks Commission Report which had identified and validated the fears of minorities within the Nigerian space.

    “Help me inform Obasanjo that the failure of the 1922 Hugh Clifford Constitution, 1946 Arthur Richards Constitution, 1951 Macpherson Constitution and 1954 Littleton Constitution, was partly ascribed to the overbearing influence of majority tribes over the minority ones (374 ethnic groups in Nigeria, according to Prof Onigu Otite ).

    “Kindly emphasize to Obasanjo that as an Elderstatesman, former military Head of State and former democratic President, his well respected public statements and opinions (which he is constitutionally entitled to, should be generously garnished with unifying, healing, therapeutic and inclusive flavor ; and not with the vinegar of devisive and provocative statements.

    “The Niger Delta region has been repressed, suppressed, marginalized and neglected. Respected Obasanjo, more than any other person,knows this very well, having had the rare privilege of governing Nigeria both in khaki and agbada.

    “The poor people have had to pay with their sweat, sorrow, tears,blood, pains and pangs, over their God-given wealth. The wealth has become a curse rather than a blessing. I wholly disagree with Obasanjo’s thesis. I rather embrace wholly embrace Pa E.K.Clark’s anthesis, which wears a human face”.

  • Raid on Justice Odili’s home politically motivated- Ozekhome

    Raid on Justice Odili’s home politically motivated- Ozekhome

    Human rights lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN), has stated that the raid on Justice Mary Odili’s home, allegedly perpetrated by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, could be politically motivated.

    Ozekhome, who visited Odili after the incident, also said that the judge did not resist the raid.

    He said, “She didn’t resist any search. I believe that they themselves would have found that they were committing terrible hara-kiri, that is, giving them the benefit of the doubt,”

    “The other theory which is also as powerful is that it is politically motivated, deliberately contrived as artifice and designed to embarrass this cerebral justice of the supreme court and to embarrass her husband.”

    TheNewsGuru reports that Justice Odili is the wife of a former governor of Rivers state, and chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Peter Odili, who is currently on the watchlist of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    Ozekhome said that the raid could have been carried to stoke fire ahead of the PDP National convention happening today in Abuja adding that the raid was an embarrassment for Nigeria.

    “Of course, the husband is a well-known PDP titan, and tomorrow is the PDP convention. Could it have been designed to rake up issues and make it look like they were trying to go after him so as to demoralise the delegates for tomorrow’s convention? That is another theory.

    “But whatever theory, one thing is clear to me, we are gradually moving towards the precipice of calling ourselves a banana republic. Nowhere in the world would secret agents just bump into the house of a justice of the supreme court and a former governor with an empty search warrant with no name written on it.”

    Meanwhile, the EFCC has denied the raid on the justice’s house claiming they were not involved.

     

     

  • Usifo Ataga: Ozekhome writes IGP, demands thorough investigation into gruesome murder of SuperTV boss

    Usifo Ataga: Ozekhome writes IGP, demands thorough investigation into gruesome murder of SuperTV boss

    Human rights lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome SAN, has written to the Inspector General of Police Usman Baba, demanding a thorough investigation in the murder of Super TV boss, Usifo Ataga, whose lifeless body was found in a Lekki service apartment in June days after he was declared missing.

    The 19-page letter, titled THE GRUESOME AND HORRIFIC MURDER OF MR. MICHAEL USIFO ATAGA: A CLARION CALL FOR THOROUGH INVESTIGATION AND DELIVERY OF JUSTICE,
    which was addressed to the IGP and copied to 10 other appropriate authorities including the Attorney General of the Federation, Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Lagos Ministry of Justice, DG, DSS, Director of Public Prosecution and the Ataga family, raised knotty questions and jigsaw puzzles to be solved.

    The lawyer, among other things questioned why it took the Police so long to prosecute the prime suspect, Chidinma Ojukwu, who already confessed to the murder before changing her confession a few days later.

    “We are only urging your Officers sir, to do their job PROPERLY AND PROFESSIONALLY. We are not asking for, and we do not intend to ask for, any special favours. Usifo and his family also do not intend to, either. WE JUST WANT JUSTICE – PURE AND UNDILUTED JUSTICE. Your duty is quite clear under the law, as severally expounded by Nigerian courts,” Ozekhome’s letter demanded.

    Recall that Chief Ozekhome was contracted by the Ataga family days back to follow the path of justice towards determining those involved in the murder of their breadwinner, and bring them to book.

    The letter in details:

    25th August, 2021

    The Inspector General of Police,
    Nigeria Police Force,
    Police Headquarters,
    Louis Edet House,
    Shehu Shagari Way,
    Abuja.

    Dear Sir,

    THE GRUESOME AND HORRIFIC MURDER OF MR. MICHAEL USIFO ATAGA: A CLARION CALL FOR THOROUGH INVESTIGATION AND DELIVERY OF JUSTICE

    INTRODUCTION

    We are Solicitors to the family of late Mr Michael Usifo Ataga (“Usifo”, “Ataga”, “our client”), who was brutally murdered on the 15th day of June, 2021, in the most horrific and spine-chilling circumstances ever imaginable. We write this letter to you to request, NOT FOR ANY SPECIAL FAVOURS, but that you use your good offices to ensure that THIS MURDER IS THOROUGHLY AND PROFESSIONALLY INVESTIGATED, PERPETRATORS PROSECUTED AND JUSTICE IMMEDIATELY SERVED in this savage and barbaric murder that cries to the high heavens for redress.

    We have advisedly decided to make this an open letter to you for the simple reason that the assassination of Mr Usifo Ataga has since been in the public domain, having been made so by your Commissioner in Charge of the Lagos State Police Command, Lagos State, Mr. Hakeem Odumosu, when he paraded the prime suspect, Miss Chidinma Adaora Ojukwu (“Chidinma”), before the media on the 24th of June, 2021. Consequently, the whole world has been following the murder’s unfolding melodrama with keen interest, to know the way and manner that Nigeria’s criminal justice system works and how justice is eventually served to the suspect, the victim and the society itself.

    Chidinma is a 21-year-old 300-level Mass Communication undergraduate of the University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos State. Late Mr. Usifo Ataga, a 50-year-old married man, a father of two and the Chief Executive Officer of Super TV, was killed in a short-let apartment at No 19, Adewale Oshin Street, Lekki Phase 1,Lagos State on June 15, 2021. Every information contained in this letter has been duly supplied to us by our client’s family; and also based on our direct access to and analysis of several media links that have since heavily publicised and widely circulated this cruel and heinous crime.

    THE GRUESOME MURDER OF USIFO ATAGA AS NARRATED BY CHIDINMA ADAORA OJUKWU HERSELF

    Mr. Usifo, from the first line of confession made by Chidinma Ojukwu herself, before the public, and during her media parade by the Police on 24th June, 2021, was severally stabbed to death in a most morbid and macabre manner. While speaking to the assembled Press in a calm and measured tone, Chidinma narrated how they supposedly had a drug-fuelled sex rendezvous that got out of hand when he allegedly tried to rape her. She said Usifo hit her head against the wall, which, according to her, forced her to grab a knife and stab him twice (emphasis supplied). However, the family members of Usifo who identified his body at the Mainland Hospital Mortuary, Yaba, Lagos State, controverted her statement and stated that Usifo was not stabbed only twice, but severally and in a most savage manner, with some stabs on his jugular and another penetrating through his ribcage from a side of his abdomen (emphasis supplied).

    Chidinma had also stated during her media parade that she stole Usifo’s money afterwards, using his ATM card and pin number that he had allegedly freely given to her, prior to the date of the murder. She said he had told her to take any amount she desired, but that she had declined because that was not what she wanted. Chidinma also admitted to satisfying herself with some money which she withdrew from Usifo’s account after brutally killing him. She said she stole N380,000 (three hundred and eighty thousand naira) only, as opposed to the N5 million (five million naira) that was transferred from his account. When questioned as to why she stole from him at all, she answered that she needed the money to pay her school fees.
    STATEMENT BY THE POLICE

    The Police under your command had also gone ahead and released a statement, saying, inter alia, that the suspect, Chidinma, had:

    “CONSPIRED WITH OTHERS, NOW AT LARGE, and allegedly murdered Michael Usifo Ataga. The short service apartment where the alleged murder was committed was secretly booked by the suspect on the 13th of June, 2021, and that she left the apartment after the deed had been done on the 15th of June, 2021. A fake driver’s license bearing Mary Johnson with the suspect’s photograph, was found amongst her belongings at her home, as well as a blood-stained cloth, ostensibly worn on the day of the murder. The suspect confessed to using a kitchen knife to stab the deceased and that she took away the evidence, the blood-stained knife and discarded it in a dustbin by her house. She also admitted stealing his iPhone” (bolden supplied for emphasis).

    STATEMENT BY THE OWNER-MANAGER OF THE SERVICE APARTMENT

    One Mrs Nkechi Mogbo, ostensibly the owner-manager of the Lekki Short Service Apartment, narrated how the suspect (Chidinma) had called to book for the apartment, using a USA WhatsApp number. Mogbo said Chidinma claimed that she had just arrived the country, and was at the airport. Mogbo stated that Chidinma said she needed a place quiet enough to quarantine herself. Mrs Mogbo said that Chidinma also stated that her passport was held at the airport, allegedly because of Covid-19 protocols.

    After taking the apartment, Chidinma, according to Mrs Nkechi Mogbo (the owner-manager), called her and the security guard a few times; and that all the time, Chidinma made sure she blocked her own number, including after committing the heinous murder. Mrs Nkechi Mogbo said Chidinma requested to extend her stay and asked not to be disturbed in the room. Mrs Mogbo said Chidinma again enquired from the short service apartment, if the deceased’s vehicle had been taken away; unaware, at this point in time, that the said owner-manager was already helping the Police in its investigation.

    Days after the incident, no one could describe Chidinma’s facial features, because according to the owner-manager and all her staff, Chidinma always wore face masks whenever she was around the service apartment. The security guard at the premises of the service apartment narrated how the suspect had even come to the gate to receive items from a delivery man who later told him, after the suspect had taken her delivery, that the items were drugs.

    Chidinma, at the press conference, publicly confessed that she committed the crime ALONE under the influence of ‘roofies’ (the street name of Rohypnol). According to Chidinma, she had taken one wrap of the deadly substance, while Usifo allegedly took three. She added that she had grabbed a kitchen knife with which she severally stabbed Ataga to death, allegedly to free herself from his purported attempt to have forceful sex with her (emphasis supplied). Forceful sex with a man for whom you personally booked an apartment to stay together with, and with his money? To say this line is incredulous is an understatement.

    THE APPALLING SCENE OF USIFO’S GRUESOME MURDER

    To say Usifo died a horrific and savage death is to put it mildly for want of a better description. He was not stabbed just 1, 2, 3, 4 or even 5 times (contrary to Chidinma’s narration); he was actually stabbed multiple times, according to Usifo’s family members (emphasis supplied). His hands were tightly bound. Several marks were deeply etched all over his wrists. These were accompanied with inerasable evidence of brutal torture and sustained assault. The rope suspected to have been used to tie his hands was reportedly found inside the service apartment and now in the custody of the Police, among several other items. The rope cut deeply into his wrists which were tightly and fiercely manacled. The sharp object with which he was pierced was said to have been driven through his ribcage and penetrated deeply. Such inhuman and degrading treatment, not befitting even of lower classes of animals, was meted out to this helpless and embattled man. His battered corpse was laid in a closed white casket for his interment which was carried out on 30th July, 2021, because of the battered and unsightly condition of his body. It must be emphasised that no one in the entire building was said to have heard any screams from Usifo. The only reasonable deduction therefore is that Usifo was obviously gagged and his screams muffled. He had been bound firmly, manacled, his voice muted and his person viciously tortured!

    The viral video of the room which was taken by the first responders to the scene – the Maroko Police Station Officers – was callously released and displayed on the internet. The video shows the grisly scene of the murder of the deceased Ataga. The video displays a room with blood-stained bespattered walls and floors. No doubt, this shows clear evidence of a ferocious struggle on the part of Usifo to live. Was it possible that Chidinma carried out all these acts all alone? Let the Courts speak to this, but only after your Officers must have done a more professionally thorough investigation (which is not the case at present). This is obviously not a case for the incessant movie media parades of Chidinma that the public has so far unfortunately been treated to!

    The Police said they had found in Usifo’s bloody room, complimentary cards; Access Bank Statement of Account; one Nigerian passport with No. B50010434 belonging to Chidinma; a fake driver’s licence bearing Mary Johnson, but with Chidinma’s photograph. Also recovered from the scene were one National Identity Card; one UBA ATM Debit card; and one University of Lagos ID Card, all bearing Chidinma’s name. The scene, to say the least, was gory and grisly indeed.

    THE UNPROFESSIONAL PARADE OF CHIDINMA OJUKWU AS A SUPER CELEBRITY

    The entire family, relations, friends, admirers, business associates and well-wishers of Usifo Ataga are greatly appalled, disgusted and pained, that rather than engage in a quiet, calm, secret and professional investigation of this dastardly act of murder to unravel the gruesome circumstances surrounding it and immediately arraigning the suspect (and others who may have been involved) to court, the Police was busy, serially parading Chidinma before the media, in the most detestable and unsympathetic manner of a celebrated Hollywood, Nollywood and Bollywood film star. Chidinma was made to appear in different apparels, with carefully packed and made-up hairstyles, occasionally allowing a smile to play on her lips; with her mouth pouted in a sneering manner. Why and by whom was Chidinma allowed access to make-up materials and artistes at a time she was being detained for a crime as serious as murder?

    Sir, for God’s sake, your officers have been trivialising a serious case of murder as “Alawada Kerikeri” histrionics of renowned Comedian, Baba Sala. The local and international communities have so far guffawed and wondered about our humanity as a people, as they are daily assailed with the splendour of scenes of a murder suspect being accorded the undeserved status of an iconic celebrity. Your Police has been playing down a serious crime of murder and insulting our individual and collective sensibilities and moral upbringing as a people.

    CHIDINMA’S EVER-CHANGING NARRATIVE

    Contrary to the voluntary self-confession made by Chidinma on the 24th of June, 2021, shortly after her arrest on the 23rd of June, 2021, and when the facts of Ataga’s savage murder were still very fresh with her, she has since serially changed her storyline, courtesy of your Lagos State Police Command’s media parade of Chidinma and her unhindered access to the Press.

    CHIDINMA’S INTERVIEW WITH THE NTA

    In an interview she later granted to the NTA, Chidinma said she narrated her story the way she did because she was scared that she would be caught. She said she “wanted to steal from him. But he was not allowing me to. So, we got into a fight and that was when I stabbed him. I tied his hands and at that time he was sleeping. I tied his hands so that by the time he wakes up, he will be able to give me what I want, and I will go. When we were fighting, the knife was at the back. I was leaning on the cabinet. That was when I stabbed him.”

    When asked how many times she stabbed Usifo, Chidinma, who had categorically said she stabbed him twice during her first media parade, said, “I didn’t count. I was on drugs and also, during the struggle, he was trying to strangle me and that was when I used the knife on him. He was already high, so he didn’t feel it. And he took more than I did. The drugs were already requested so I went to collect it outside. He sent me money already to order for the drug, but the drug didn’t arrive on that Monday, so it arrived on Tuesday. We also smoked and drank. The incident happened early in the morning, so I got myself in the afternoon. Towards afternoon was when I got myself. By that time, he already passed out.”

    Asked whether if she had asked Usifo to voluntarily give her money, he would have been so stingy as to refuse her, Chidinma answered, “No, he wouldn’t…I asked him, but he said he didn’t have.”

    CRIME FIGHTERS CASE FILE’S INTERVIEW WITH CHIDINMA

    In yet another interview with CRIME FIGHTERS CASE FILE, Chidinma confessed that she stopped doing ushering business of N15,000 – N20,000, because Usifo was giving her more money than the ushering provided. She appeared this time around to have recanted the withdrawal of N380,000 from Usifo’s account because in her new narration, the N400,000 or N500,000 found in her account was proceeds from the sale of a Mac Pro laptop that Usifo had given to her.

    Chidinma, who had earlier confessed to personally stabbing Ataga twice with a kitchen knife (during the media parade); and again not knowing how many times she had stabbed him (during the NTA interview), suddenly changed her story. This time around, she claims that she had left the apartment to go and buy food, and upon returning to the apartment, the door (allegedly previously locked by Ataga) was unlocked. She said when she knocked and there was no answer, she opened the door by herself, only to discover that:

    “the duvet was on the floor, plus pillows. The couch was facing the door and the bed was stained with blood already. The floor where he was was blood and then music was on, the TV was on. The room was already disarranged like someone broke in. Then I saw him on the floor. I didn’t know what to do. I took my things with his things and left. I was just afraid. I didn’t know if I had raised alarm, they would have just arrested me for doing it because I and him were just the only people in the room. I just left. I was packing my things to leave and then I noticed that my cloth was stained, so I changed it to another. I took the bags that contained ID and documents, bank statements. My bag was already on the floor, I met my bag on the floor. The stuff he was with was on the TV set, that’s where the stuff I took was on. So I just packed them and put them into the nylon and left. I took his phone. The following week, I was home. Then I went out to withdraw some money from the ATM that I was with, I withdrew 200k.”

    Did your Policemen ever investigate who this “someone” who “broke in”, according to Chidinma, was? If so, who was the person(s)? Did your Police Investigators actually find out how much Chidinma actually withdrew from Usifo’s account; and if so, how much balance was left in the said account after the said withdrawal(s)?

    Chidinma, during this later interview with Crime Fighters Case Files, also recanted her earlier story (during the media parade) with a new narration that, “It’s not like I had something to do with his death, I never had anything to do with his death.” Oh, really?

    When asked by the interviewer why she was now denying stabbing Ataga, Chidinma said:

    “I didn’t involve anybody. I don’t know who must have come into the apartment. Definitely somebody did that, but I don’t know who that person is. I don’t know what happened when I left to go buy food. Because of the thing I did after, not alerting Police and also withdrawing money, I feel guilty for what happened. I did not kill him. Knowing fully well that I did not kill him, but my doings, taking his money and not reporting to the Police, I believe that somebody knew where we were and then waited till I left before they could enter. The pressure and people. When I was confronting the security guy and he was like, “no, nobody entered into the apartment. That it was just me that entered into the apartment”. And knowing fully well of what I did and withdrawing the money, I just took the blame on myself. That since no one believes, let me just take it. No one is influencing my statement. I have not spoken to anybody, my relations or anybody. I’ve just been in the cell since.”

    Did your Officers note Chidinma’s ever-changing narrative with each media house? If so, what was their reaction to it?

    KNOTTY QUESTIONS AND JIGSAW PUZZLES THAT MUST NOW BE SOLVED

    We have decided to go this whole length in paraphrasing the fresh narratives of Chidinma in subsequent press interviews, after her first media parade voluntary confession of murdering Ataga in cold blood, to raise some pertinent questions and highlight certain jigsaw puzzles that need to be solved now by your Police Investigators. Not the wishy-washy one that the public has so far been assailed with. By the way, were these media parades and press interviews necessary at all? Were the statements made by Chidinma during these media parades and press interviews not supposed to form part of her extra-judicial statements made under caution, before the Police, and which would then be used in prosecuting her? This entire murder case has so far been MOST unprofessionally handled and perhaps deliberately bungled. But why should this be the case? The Ataga family (our client) has already pointedly accused the Police of deliberately bungling the investigations, so as to allow some major suspects escape justice, or give them soft landing by arraigning them before a Chief Magistrate court and slapping their wrists with lesser offences. See https://punchng.com/super-tv-ceo-family-accuses-lagos-police-of-cover-up-hires-ozekhome/; https://www.premiumtimesng.com/regional/ssouth-west/470249-there-is-more-to-atagas-death-than-alleged-murderers-confession-family.html; https://www.arise.tv/late-ataga-family-hires-ozekhome-says-lagos-police-commissioner-lacks-professionalism/.

    Late Ataga was said to be on the verge of one of the greatest breakthroughs that Nigeria has ever witnessed through his media establishment, Super TV. Super TV is a mobile-enabled platform with two major telecommunication multinationals on board. It was designed to create affordable subscription rates. Does this have any link with or clue to Ataga’s murder?

    Ataga, from the gruesome circumstances of his horrific death, was obviously brutally tortured. He was not just given one blow, or stabbed once or twice and left alone to die in pains. No. Evidence of multiple stab wounds existed on different parts of his body. Was someone intimidating him and trying to extract valuable information out of him? Why was one brutal stab directed at his neck, his very jugular? This was obviously designed to kill him. And death Usifo did experience. Was it that someone wanted him out of the way at all cost? Did they see him as a threat in the media industry? If so, who may these be?

    Did Chidinma carry out the murder alone (her first narration)? Could she have single-handedly matched Ataga, an acclaimed amateur boxer and body builder, in a one-on-one brawl, going by the frail-looking young lady we all saw on television, newspapers and the social media? Could she have solely overpowered the deceased who allegedly raped her by force? By the way, why would Ataga rape Chidinma, a lady he was already dating, and who had actually agreed that she booked their rendezvous with Usifo’s own money which he had voluntarily transferred to her? Does it make any sense to any right thinking member of the public?

    Why would Ataga give Chidinma his ATM card, with the pin numbers, to go and withdraw any sum she desired, when he could easily have personally transferred same to her, as he had been doing before then? Remember, Chidinma had stated that he had transferred to her the money with which she booked the hotel. Which was easier: a simple electronic transfer by Usifo to Chidinma in the cosy comfort of the apartment, or her having to queue up in front of long lines at an ATM gallery? Why would she subject herself to ATM daily withdrawal limits, when any sum Ataga desired for her could seamlessly have been transferred to her by a simple press of the button?

    In this day of easy electronic bank transfers, which person gives his or her bank card and pin number to another, when he or she can easily electronically transfer any amount to such a person? If indeed Ataga gave Chidinma his ATM card and told her to take any sum she wanted (as she claimed), did he also give her his BVN? How did she obtain it? Usifo Ataga’s company was said to have some substantial amount of money in an escrow account. The first attempt was said to have been to try and move the money. Was this done before or after Usifo Ataga had been killed? Who attempted the transfer? Was it that because these funds were in an Escrow account, Usifo Ataga needed to be tortured to access it, since neither he, nor anyone else could ever move even a kobo from his escrow account, even if he wanted to? Why was his money in another separate account moved to his account for which they had his ATM card, and then the siphoning spree of his funds began? N5 million (five million naira) was said to have been moved from the account in just one day – perhaps the maximum withdrawal sum allowed. Who did it? Was there a massive conspiracy? And if so, by whom?

    Also, someone was said to have sent in some instructions, trying to change Ataga’s banking security details. That singular act was said to have flagged up the account, which was then promptly blocked. Who was this person(s) and why did he (they) do so?

    Chidinma claimed that she wanted money for school fees. Oh, really? Did she need a trillion naira from the Central Bank of Nigeria’s vault to pay her mere school fees?

    How come no one in the entire premises ever heard Chidinma or Usifo’s screams for help during the fight over the alleged rape? Why was the sudden latter changes in Chidinma’s narration? Who was tutoring her, or doctoring her earlier stance? For what reasons?

    Why was the Pathologist not called to the crime scene immediately the Police was informed about the murder? Why was the media granted immediate access to the crime scene? Why did it take the Police 30 days (15th July, 2021) to get the autopsy of Usifo done after his murder which occurred on 15th June, 2021? Why was no forensics carried out on Usifo’s Range Rover Vehicle still parked at the Maroko Police Station till date? What is the status of the exhibits collected at the crime scene, including, but not limited to, the rope, the broken half table glass, etc?

    Why is the autopsy report still not ready till date, despite the Pathologist having handed over different samples taken from Usifo’s body to the Police during the autopsy on 15th July, 2021?

    Why did it take the Police so long before finally arraigning Chidinma before a Chief Magistrate court at Yaba (a court that has no jurisdiction to try a murder case)? Recall that this was a murder which had been committed since 15th June, 2021? Why, after having waited so long, did the Police not deem it fit to first obtain the legal advice of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), before rushing Chidinma to a Chief Magistrate Court, which it very well knew, has no jurisdiction over murder cases? Was this not another deliberate act of putting the cart before the horse? Was anyone, or some unseen hands, stifling this murder investigation and trial, hoping that in the usual Nigerian way, the matter will simply die off with the passage of time? If so, who are these faceless people? What has been their interest in the entire murder case? Does Chidinma know more than she has so far sung about like a canary?

    Recall sir, that our client (the Ataga family) had, some time ago, accused your officers of low-level professionalism in promptly bringing to book and prosecuting the perpetrators of this heinous crime that led to their son’s unprovoked and cold-blooded murder. The family had accused the Lagos State Police Commissioner, Hakeem Odumosu, of being complicit in an alleged attempt to protect the killer(s) of Usifo. The family had said that they were shocked that the prosecution of Chidinma, the 21-year-old prime suspect in Ataga’s murder, was arraigned at a Chief Magistrate Court, Yaba, without even being informed about the arraignment coming up. Why was this so?

    The family had also decried the alleged VIP treatment accorded Chidinma in her movement from the Police cell to Court and from Court to the prison of Chidinma, when she was driven in the front seat of a Toyota Camry Uber ride, without even handcuffs and without the least courtesy of the family being informed of the arraignment. Why were these so? The family also alleged that the man who had claimed to be Chidinma’s father and who was also charged before the Chief Magistrates’ court for obstructing Police investigation, was actually not Chidinma’s biological father after all, but her “sugar daddy”. The family postulated that this means that the Police had deliberately lied to it. Was this the case? If so, did the Police find out about the identity of Chidinma’s true biological father and her connection with this adopted father (now said to be her “sugar daddy”)?

    The family had also revealed that one Babalola Disu, who was arraigned for allegedly preventing the Police from performing their duties and failing to report a crime to the Police, is “highly suspected to have carried out the murder”. The family premised its suspicion on information it had to the effect that Disu’s short rental apartment was directly opposite the apartment where Ataga was killed. The family narrated how the said Disu had asked that the carpenter of the Air BnB short service apartment should be called to fix his door, only for the carpenter to be told that it was actually Usifo’s door that was broken. The family said it also suspects the said Disu for having a hand in Usifo’s murder because of the manner in which he disappeared from the service apartment and wondered why he was charged for mere obstruction and failure to report a crime, thus being granted bail in the ridiculous sum of 1 million naira only. The bail was granted by Chief Magistrate Adeola Adedayo, in the most liberal bail conditions of 1 million naira each with two sureties in like sum, to ALL THE SUSPECTS involved in the murder (except Chidinma) in such a heinous crime of hideous and horrific murder. Why did Disu obstruct Police investigation and over what crime? How did he do so? What crime did Disu fail to report to the Police for which he was now charged? Was it the murder case? And if so, how was he connected to it and under what circumstances did he know about it? Questions, questions and questions. The Ataga family needs answers, answers and answers.

    The Ataga family had also directly accused your Lagos State Police Commissioner of being complicit in deliberately bungling the Usifo murder investigation through his lack of seriousness, depth, thoroughness, and professionalism. Such a grave accusation by Usifo’s family should not be left uninvestigated and the truth discovered.

    YES, USIFO, THE DECEASED, CANNOT NOW SPEAK!

    Usifo is dead, cold dead. His physical body remains have since been buried on the 30th of July, 2021. He cannot therefore now speak for, or defend himself. But, the above questions and more, must be asked and answered on his behalf. The above jigsaw puzzles must now be solved. The Police must unravel them and properly re-arraign before a proper court of law with the urgency of yesterday, Chidinma and other perpetrators of this dastardly crime.

    THE HALLOWED DUTY OF THE POLICE

    We are only urging your Officers sir, to do their job PROPERLY AND PROFESSIONALLY. We are not asking for, and we do not intend to ask for, any special favours. Usifo and his family also do not intend to, either. WE JUST WANT JUSTICE – PURE AND UNDILUTED JUSTICE. Your duty is quite clear under the law, as severally expounded by Nigerian courts.

    In AYINDE v. STATE (2018) LPELR-44761(SC), the apex court of Nigeria held:

    “The detection of crime, which is the responsibility of the Police, falls into three distinguishable phases: the discovery that a crime has been committed; the identification of a suspect; and the collection of sufficient evidence to indict the suspect before a Court – Britannica.com. So, criminal identification is not only the most potent factor in securing the apprehension of the criminal, but its establishment enables the Judiciary to sentence the guilty equitably – Jstor.org.” Per AMINA ADAMU AUGIE, JSC (Pp 24 – 24 Paras B – D).

    Similarly, in IBRAHIM v. COP, KWARA STATE (2021) LPELR-53989(CA), the Court of Appeal, following laid down pronouncements by the Supreme Court of Nigeria, held as follows:
    “It is the position of the Court that once a complaint of commission of crime is properly laid before the police, it is the constitutional and statutory duty of the police to investigate it as investigation of crime, prevention and detection of crime and preservation of life and property are the primary duties of the police. It is the right of the appellant to make a complaint to the police after he was attacked and his properties snatched from him. The police have a duty to investigate the complaint. See FABIYI V. STATE (2013) LPELR-21180 (CA) AT 45-46 (D-G).” Per MISITURA OMODERE BOLAJI-YUSUFF, JCA (Pp 19 – 20 Paras E – B).

    See also DOSOMAH v. C.O.P, EDO STATE & ORS (2014) LPELR-24497(CA); OLUTIDE & ORS v. HAMZAT & ORS (2016) LPELR-26047(CA); ONAH v. OKENWA & ORS (2010) LPELR-4781(CA).

    OUR MODEST DEMANDS

    Our client has instructed us to demand, from the Police, and WE HEREBY DEMAND as follows:

    That your Officers FORTHWITH re-investigate the entire Usifo murder case more properly and more professionally, and hand over the findings of its investigations to the Lagos State DPP to properly and formally re-arraign Chidinma Ojukwu; and the other co-accused persons who had already been charged before a Chief Magistrate court and hurriedly granted bail. These are the persons of Babalola Disu; Ojukwu (Chidinma’s alleged father or “sugar daddy”); Jessica Egbochi; Abayomi Olutayo; and, Ifeoluwa Olowu; and ANY OTHER PERSON(S) whom the Police investigation may still throw up as having been linked to Usifo’s beastly and cold-blooded murder.

    That your Officers FORTHWITH HALT any further funny and phony parade of Chidinma, or allow her access to media interviews. These invariably lead to total trivialisation and mockery of a serious crime of brutal murder committed against Usifo, our client’s illustrious son, father, husband, breadwinner and community leader per excellence. Such parades also have the unsalutary effect of negatively impacting on our societal values and the morals of Nigerians, especially the youth, who may erroneously, but unwittingly, behold Chidinma as a heroine.

    LAST LINE

    Let us be very emphatic about this. Though Usifo has died and his battered body committed to Mother Earth since 30th July, 2021, his soul lives on. His dogged spirit fights on for justice. His teary eyes demand societal fairness. His shackled and manacled body, stabbed serially in a most vicious and hideous manner, yearns for freedom and recompense. His pierced jugular cries to the high heavens that his murderer(s) be properly and professionally prosecuted and accorded their just dessert. In these simple demands of the Ataga family, we SHALL ENSURE THAT JUSTICE IS NOT ONLY DONE, BUT IS SEEN BY THE WHOLE WORLD TO HAVE BEEN MANIFESTLY DONE. CONSEQUENTLY, WE SHALL LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED; AND NO TURN UNSTONED, IN SEEING THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED TO THE ETERNAL MEMORY OF LATE MR MICHAEL USIFO ATAGA.

    To say more at this stage will be otiose.

    Please, accept the assurances of our highest regards.

    Yours faithfully,

    Chief Mike A. A. Ozekhome, SAN, OFR, FCIArb, LL.M, Ph.D., LL. D

    Chief Counsel/Head of Chambers

    Attorney-General of the Federation and
    Minister of Justice,
    Ministry of Justice,
    Abuja.

    The Director General,
    Department of State Security (DSS),
    DSS Headquarters,
    1 Maitama Avenue, P.M.B. 253,
    Abuja.

    The Deputy Inspector-General of Police,
    Homicide Section,
    Force Criminal Intelligence & Investigation Department (FCIID),
    The Nigeria Police Force,
    Area 10, Garki,
    Abuja.

    The Commissioner of Police,
    Lagos State Police Command,
    Ikeja,
    Lagos State.

    The Commissioner of Police,
    Force Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department (FCIID),
    Alagbon Close, Ikoyi,
    Lagos State.

    The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
    State Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department (SCIID),
    Panti, Yaba,
    Lagos State.

    The Attorney-General and
    Commissioner for Justice, Lagos State,
    Lagos State Ministry of Justice,
    Alausa, Ikeja,
    Lagos State.

    The Director of Public Prosecution (DPP),
    Lagos State,
    Alausa, Ikeja,
    Lagos State.

    The State Director,
    Department of State Security (DSS),
    Lagos State Command,
    22 CMD Road,
    Lagos State.

    The bereaved Ataga Family.

  • Buhari’s appointment of new acting IGP illegal, unconstitutional – Ozekhome

    Buhari’s appointment of new acting IGP illegal, unconstitutional – Ozekhome

    Popular human rights activist and lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN) on Wednesday described the appointment of the new acting Inspector General of Police (IGP) Usman Alkali Baba as illegal and unconstitutional.

    Ozekhome contended Baba’s appointment negated provisions of Federal Character as enshrined in the 1999 constitution, as amended.

    He stated this in a statement titled “Buhari’s Northernisation of Nigeria Police.”

    The activist lawyer argued the President lacks the power to single handedly appoint the IGP.

    He said the President can only appoint an IGP in conjunction with the Nigeria Police Council comprising Mr. President as chairman, all the 36 state governors, the chairman of the Police Service Commission and the IGP.

    He argued the appointment of Baba, as the new acting IGP “is capricious, arbitrary, whimsical, unconscionable, illegal, unlawful, wrongful and unconstitutional.”

    The senior advocate wondered why the President chose to ignore and disrespect the Federal Character principle enshrined in section 14(3) of the 1999 Constitution.

    He lamented the appointment DIG Usman Alkali Baba, a northern Muslim, as acting inspector-general of police, to replace Adamu Mohammed, another northern Muslim.

    He said: “With Muhammad Maigari Dingyadi, another northern Muslim as the minister of police affairs, the circle of policing in Nigeria is complete.

    “Of course, Buhari controls the police by virtues of sections 214, 215 and 216 of the 1999 Constitution. It is the same situation with the ministry of petroleum resources and NNPC, the entire security architecture of Nigeria, and other key sectors and commanding heights of the economy.

    “The illogical and puerile argument is always that the president only appoints people he can trust and that such persons are qualified in any event. That argument is insulting and insensitive to the intelligence, sensibilities and plurality of Nigeria.

    “Can’t President Muhammadu Buhari for once, just for once, in his opaque appointments look beyond his religion and immediate and forsake sectionalism, cronyism, prebendalism, tribalism, favouritism, and act as a true statesman?

    “Is he truly saying he cannot trust any of the other over 15 million Nigerians who voted for him, or that he cannot find any of them that is qualified to be made an IGP?”

  • Court stops EFCC from arresting Ozekhome for criticising Magu

    Court stops EFCC from arresting Ozekhome for criticising Magu

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, restrained the EFCC from inviting, harassing and threatening to arrest or detain Mr Mike Ozekhome, SAN, for criticising the former Acting Chairman of The commission, Ibrahim Magu.

    Delivering judgment, Justice Inyang Ekwo held that serial acts of intimidation and constant invitations the EFCC extended to Ozekhome were illegal, unlawful, wrong and unconstitutional.

    The lawyer had told the court that the intimidation, invitations as well as threats to arrest, detain and humiliate him were over publications and speeches he made.

    The respect to the “apparent opaqueness and lopsidedness” of the corruption fight of the EFCC under the leadership of Magu.

    The court held that the action of the agency constituted a violation of Ozekhome’s fundamental rights as enshrined in sections 35, 37, 39 and 41 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    The court said the action of the anti-graft agency also contravened Articles 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 14 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Ratification and Enforcement Act, Cap. A9 LFN 2004.

    The judgement was sequel to a fundamental rights enforcement suit instituted by Ozekhome in the court.

    The EFCC, Magu and one of its lead operatives, Abubakar Madaki were named as the first to third respondents in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/324/2018

    Ozekhome had told the court that aside from repeatedly summoning him to appear for questioning, the EFCC froze his bank account after he was paid his legal fees totalling the sum of N75 million, by the former governor of Ekiti, Ayodele Fayose.

    The lawyer maintained that one of the reasons the EFCC made him its primary target, was due to the fact that he secured so many legal victories against it in various courts in the country.

    He said he did not commit any offence to warrant the incessant invitations and threats to arrest, detain or declare him wanted by the respondents.

    He further told the court that the account from which the N75 million was paid to him, belonged to the former governor of Ekiti, who he said had not been convicted by any court to warrant labelling the money as proceed of crime.

    Ozekhome averred that it took the intervention of the Federal High Court in Lagos to unfreeze his bank account.

    Consequently, he prayed the court to among other things, declare that he was entitled to receive legal fees for professional services he rendered to clients.

    He further asked the court to compel the respondents to publish an unreserved apology to him in three prominent dailies for the breach of his right.

    He also asked the court for an order directing the respondents to jointly and severally pay the sum of N5 billion to him as damages for the violation of his rights.

    However, the EFCC, in a counter-affidavit that was deposed to by one of its operatives, Usman Aliyu, urged the court to dismiss the suit.

    The Commission told the court that Ozekhome was being investigated for a lot of cases bordering on money laundering and tax evasion based on intelligence report from the Nigeria Financial Intelligent Unit, (NFIU).

    It told the court that Ozekhome received various sums of money at different times from DAAR Investment & Holding Company Limited, Ekiti Government and the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, (NNPC) without payment of taxes due to both the Federal and Ekiti state governments.

    The EFCC also told the court that further investigation revealed an attempt by the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Patience, to launder money through Ozekhome in the sum of N1 billion.

    Justice Ekwo in his judgment said that he was satisfied that Ozekhome established a case of intimidation and harassment by the respondents.

    He held that though the court would always restrain itself from interfering with the functions of statutory bodies like the EFCC.

    “That is only in so far as such agency is demonstrably shown to be acting pursuant to the veritable spirit of the law.

    “Where the act of such statutory body is shown to be manifestly predicated on ill will, malice and animosity, the law will intervene.

    ” The Court will never allow the law to be used as instrument of vendetta or vindictiveness as established in this case.

    “On the whole, I find that the applicant has establish clear case of animus by the respondents in the manner of incessant invitation to him,” the judge said.

    The judge, however, declined to either award damages in his favour or compel EFCC to apologise to him.