Tag: Natasha

  • Just in: FG arraigns Senator Natasha for alleged defamation

    Just in: FG arraigns Senator Natasha for alleged defamation

    The Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has been arraigned before Justice Chizoba Orji of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court for alleged defamation.

    The lawmaker was arraigned on Thursday by the Federal Government on three counts bordering on alleged defamation of Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

    The government accused the Senator of “making imputation knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm the reputation of a person”, citing Section 391 of the penal code, CAP 89, laws of the federation, 1990. The offence is punishable under Section 392 of the same law.

    The list of witnesses showed that Akpabio and Bello would testify during the trial.

    One of the charges was linked to an allegation by Akpoti-Uduaghan, wherein she accused the Senate President and the former Kogi governor of plotting to assassinate her.

  • Akpabio: Agbakoba demands retraction of Natasha’s sexual harassment allegation

    Akpabio: Agbakoba demands retraction of Natasha’s sexual harassment allegation

    Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), former president, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), has written a second letter to Sen.Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, demanding retraction of “her unsubstantiated sexual harassment allegations against Senate President, Godswill Akpabio.”

    NAN reports that the Olisa Agbakoba Legal (OAL) are lawyers to Akpabio.

    Recall that Agbakoba  in a letter to  Akpoti-Uduaghan on April 14, requested the senator, representing Kogi central to provide  evidence on her sexual harassment allegations against the senate president.

    The controversial allegation led to the suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan by the senate.

    Addressing newsmen on Tuesday in Lagos, Agbakoba said the latest letter became necessary, owing to the fact that the embattled senator had failed to clarify  significant contradictions in her allegation against Akpabio, as demanded in his first letter.

    He said, instead of clarifying the contradictions in her allegation that Akpabio sexually harassed her on Dec. 8, 2023, and her exaltation of her alleged harasser on her social media accounts on Dec. 9, 2023; Akpoti -Uduaghan  deleted the  social media post.

    The  former NBA president said, “Recall that in our first letter to you,  we requested  clarification of  contradictions in your  allegation against our client, Akpabio.

    “Of note is the contradiction as to timeline and dates. You have failed to clarify your sexual harassment allegation on Dec. 8, 2023 and your exaltation of Akpabio on your social media accounts (Instagram and X/Twitter) on Dec. 9, 2023 – the day after you alleged he sexually harassed you.

    “Rather than clarify this contradiction, you deleted the social media post, which to us is extremely concerning.”

    The renowned lawyer told journalists that no matter what was said about Akpabio, the duty to prove the allegation rests with the embattled Kogi senator.

    Agbakoba also  requested  Akpoti-Uduaghan to clarify the lengthy timeline it took for her to make the sexual harassment allegation.

    “You claim that the sexual harassment occurred on Dec. 8, 2023 but your allegation was not made until Feb. 28 2025. One year and 2 months after?

    “Additionally, rather than take up this serious allegation that occurred on  Dec.8, 2023, you were seen throughout 2024 at several legislative and non-legislative events (locally and internationally) with  Akpabio, your alleged harasser.

    “For example, you were seen together at the Inter-Parliamentary Union session in Geneva on March  24 and March  25  2024. In fact, you took several selfies and group photos with him during these events.

    “All these events were posted in warm tones by you on your social media platforms. Please see screenshot copies of your Facebook post(s) and other photos you took with Akpabio. We find this contradictory and unbelievable.

    “In light of this and having also failed to clarify inconsistencies pointed in our first letter to you, we demand that you retract the sexual harassment allegations against our client as they are clearly false and unsubstantiated,” Agbakoba declared.

  • Tuface begins marriage rites process with new lover Natasha

    Tuface begins marriage rites process with new lover Natasha

    Nigerian recording artiste, Innocent Idibia who is better known as 2Baba on Monday, April 21st introduced his Edo state lawmaker, Hon. Natasha Osawaru, to the Idoma traditional leadership and his hometown community.

    TheNewsGuru reports that this comes months after the controversial singer announced his divorce from estranged wife, Annie Idibia.

    According to reports, the introduction held during the Idoma Nation Peace and Unity Symposium at the Och’Idoma Palace in Otukpo.

    2Baba, who was in attendance with his lover, introduced her to  His Royal Majesty, the Och’Idoma V, and assembled kinsmen after which, proceeded to Okpokwu, his ancestral hometown in Benue State, where they met with local elders and community members.

    The legendary singer reaffirmed his commitment and sought the endorsement of the elders for the former Deputy Majority Leader of the Edo State House of Assembly.

    2Baba expressed his intention to marry Osawaru, describing her as a young, brilliant, and amazing woman.

  • BREAKING: Gunmen reportedly invade Senator Natasha’s family residence

    BREAKING: Gunmen reportedly invade Senator Natasha’s family residence

    Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s family residence in Kogi was reportedy invaded by gunmen around 1 a.m. on Tuesday, April 16, leaving damaged windows but no injuries.

    The incident happened at her hometown residence in Obeiba-Ihima, located in Okehi Local Government Area of Kogi State.

    Sources familiar with the event said the attackers arrived around 1:00 a.m. Armed with cutlasses and guns, they damaged parts of the building, smashing windows and causing panic in the area. At least three men were involved in the attack.

    Senator Natasha’s Chief Security Officer, Yakubu Ovanja, quickly informed the appropriate security agencies.

    In response, officers from the Okehi Police Division rushed to the scene.

    Although nobody was hurt and no suspects have been arrested yet, security officials recorded the extent of the damage and launched a preliminary investigation.

    The reason behind the attack is still unknown, and as of now, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has not released any official statement. She represents Kogi Central in the Senate and is known as a vocal figure in Nigerian politics.

    According to Zagazola Makama, police are still trying to figure out what motivated the attackers and are working to find those responsible.

  • I have three daughters, interested in finding truth – Agbakoba on Akpabio vs Natasha

    I have three daughters, interested in finding truth – Agbakoba on Akpabio vs Natasha

    The Olisa Agbakoba Legal (OAL), solicitor to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, says it is interested in finding out the truth about the allegation of sexual harassment against Akpabio.

    The allegation was made by suspended Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    At a news conference in Lagos on Tuesday, Senior Partner at OAL and rights activist, Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), said that an allegation of sexual harassment was a serious case.

    “Allegation of sexual harassment is a serious matter that deserves careful handling.

    “We acknowledge the difficulty faced by anyone making such an allegation and the importance of treating all parties with dignity,” Agbakoba said.

    He said that OAL accepted the brief in a conciliatory manner.

    “I have three daughters and, so, understand the gravity of sexual harassment.

    “I am ready to meet with Akpoti-Uduaghan and her lawyers on the issue.”

    According to Agbakoba, OAL is only interested in the legal angle to the allegation.

    “Sexual harassment allegations, particularly in governance institutions, require careful handling not only for the parties involved but also for the integrity of our democratic institutions,” he said.

    Agbakoba said that the case should be resolved through institutional processes rather than media channels, emphasising the importance of commitment to transparency and justice.

    “Sexual harassment is serious. Also is presumption of innocence. Let the facts lead, not sentiment,” he said.

    NAN

  • Natasha/Akpabio ‘wahala’: Senate fast progressing in error – Ex-lawmaker, Teejay Yusuf

    Natasha/Akpabio ‘wahala’: Senate fast progressing in error – Ex-lawmaker, Teejay Yusuf

    A three-term former member of the House of Representatives, Hon Teejay Yusuf has said the Senate is fast progressing in error over the feud between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate.

    The lawmaker who is fondly called Teejay by his political acolytes and childhood friends represented Kabba-Bunu/Ijumu Federal Constituency at the House of Representatives; 2011 to 2023.

    In a statement he personally signed, Teejay examined the feud and gave cogent reasons why it was needless and the way forward.

    “As a former federal lawmaker, who had the privilege of representing my constituency, and Nigeria for twelve years in the House of Representatives, I feel disappointed at the way, and manner the disagreement between the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio; and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is being managed.

    ” Initially, one had thought that the Senate; with experienced lawmakers in the leadership, and membership will apply more wisdom, tact, and restraint in handling the issues.

    “But alas, the reverse is the case! Fact is, the Senate seems to be progressing in error, on a needless matter that should not have led to a full-blown crisis; as been witnessed if the leadership had exhibited genuinty, sincerity, transparency, fairness, and true comradeship ab initio.

    “Perhaps it is necessary to ask; why go to war when proper reasoning would have saved the situation? Perhaps one should reiterate that the Senate leadership should know that might; as being displayed is not necessarily strength.

    “Indeed, the relocation of seating arrangement; which was the initial matter should not have been allowed to snowball into other bigger issues if handled with care, fairness, and understanding.

    ” Somehow, as events unfold it appears there is more to the matter. First, Akpabio, not realizing the microphone was on, allegedly gave directive for the suspension of Natasha; whilst discussions were still on-going.

    ” Two, it took public outcry before attending to the Petition by Natasha’s constituents. Three, the swiftness, and hurried nature in which the Senate’s Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petition completed its assignment, and submitted the Report gave serious concerns. Four, the numbers of weighty recommendations, and severity gives the impression that the Committee may be “dancing to the rhythms of some drummers.” Five, reports of alleged manipulation of the Committee’s attendance list were not taken with seriousness, and may have been consigned to history.”

    He explained: “It should be reiterated that Parliament, all over the world is naturally a place of contestation. That Akpoti-Uduaghan complained about the seating arrangement is not out of the ordinary. Such would have been resolved peacefully and amicably; without recourse to brickbats, and emotional outbursts by all parties.

    ” In any case, similar (and possibly worse) incidents had happened in Nigeria’s Legislature which did not lead to what we are witnessing.

    ” Recall Akpabio’s disagreement with Senator Saraki (then Senate President over seating arrangement; Saraki and Senator David Mark (then Senate President) over some issues; Femi Gbajabiamila (as Opposition Leader); Rep. Chinda Kingsley, Rima Shawulu, and my humble self with Gbajabiamila (as Speaker). In all of these situations, despite fierce protestations, and arguments they were resolved amicably; it did not lead to the suspension of any member or senator. That is the beauty, and significance of the Legislature.

    “It is imperative to counsel Akpabio, and the leadership of Nigeria’s Senate that they should learn to accommodate dissenting voices as much as practicable and possible. Senators who are new, and others should be allowed to ventilate their opinions, and make contributions to debates; even when the leadership have different positions. That is what makes the Legislature vibrant and dynamic.

    ” Undoubtedly, with the voices of Akpoti-Uduaghan, and similar others making valuable contributions to national issues, at this time will bring positives to the Senate. Also, the Senate can leverage on the popularity of Akpoti-Uduaghan (and others) to generate positive public perception about the Legislature, and deepen Nigeria’s democracy.

    “While I congratulate Akpoti-Uduaghan for being dogged, steadfast, and refusing to be cowed in the midst of harassment and intimidation, I wish to appeal that she should continue to stay committed towards impacting positively on the good people of Kogi Central Senatorial District who have consistently invested their total support for her not minding the crude theatrics and propaganda by few people.

    “I strongly advise the Kogi state government not to internalize the crisis, which has external origination. That the government is allegedly involved in the matter is very unfortunate.

    “Also, reports that the government was behind the recall of Akpoti-Uduaghan is outrightly condemnable, preposterous and cowardly.

    ” I appeal to those behind the recall to backtrack, and stop forthwith by not overheating the political system in Kogi state. Elections are over, though of different political parties, Akpoti-Uduaghan is representing the state at the National Assembly.

    “The best Kogi state government can do is to seek ways towards resolving the crisis, and not taking sides, and embarking on actions that will end in failures.

    “Finally, as an advocate of peace, unity, and development, I believe that the needless crisis between Akpabio and Akpoti-Uduaghan can still be resolved. Fact is, the image of the Senate has been bruised, and battered. Something immediate, and timely needs to be done. Going forward, I call on credible, and patriotic Nigerians; in or out of government to step up, and intervene on the lingering feud in the overall interest of the country.

     

    RT. HON. TEEJAY YUSUF
    (Former member, representing Kabba-Bunu/Ijumu Federal Constituency at the House of Representatives; 2011 to 2023)

  • UPDATED: Court bars Akpoti-Uduaghan, Akpabio, Imasuen from media interviews

    UPDATED: Court bars Akpoti-Uduaghan, Akpabio, Imasuen from media interviews

    The Federal High Court (FHC) in Abuja on Friday, restrained Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan; the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and two others from granting media interviews while the suit filed by Natasha is still pending before the court.

    The new judge, Justice Binta Nyako, gave the order during the hearing of the suit filed by the suspended senator seeking to stop the Senate from investigating her.

    The development followed a complaint by Akpabio’s lawyer, Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, that Akpoti-Uduaghan had allegedly been going from one media station to another, granting press interviews on issues relating to the suit.

    Others affected by the order include the Clerk of the National Assembly (NASS), the Senate and Sen. Neda Imasuen, the Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct.

    Justice Nyako ordered that no party or counsel in the suit should grant media interviews pending the hearing and determination of the case

    “There should be no press interview by all parties and counsel as regard the subject matter of this case; no streaming or social media post as regard this case; no TV interview as regard this case.

    “There should be total media blockage,” the judge held.

    According to the judge, this case is sub judice.

    “Therefore, nobody; either the plaintiff or the respondents should do anything that will foist a faith accompli on the court,” she added.

    Justice Nyako, who acknowledged that there are accredited journalists in the court with a press centre, threatened whoever streams the proceedings of the court live with contempt of the court.

    Earlier when the matter was called, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s  lawyer, Jibrin Okutepa, SAN, said the matter was coming for the first time before the judge, having been transferred from another court presided over by Justice Obiora Egwuatu.

    He applied that all the processes filed be taken together, including the preliminary objections, the substantive suit and their disciplinary application, giving the urgency involved.

    He told the court that the life span of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s  suspension was six months, hence the need for expeditious hearing and determination of the suit.

    Responding, lawyer to the clerk of NASS, Charles Iyoila, though did not oppose Okutepa’s application for consolidated hearing, he said “on the issue of contempt, we shall not be in position to receive the Form 48 and Form 49 on behalf of our client,” for substituted service.

    Also counsel to the Senate, Paul Daudu, SAN, did not object to Okutepa’s prayer, stating that a counter affidavit and preliminary objection had been field on his client’s behalf.

    He, however, informed that a motion was filed on March 21 seeking an extension of time to regularised their processes

    However, Justice Nyako stated that she would be stating the matter afresh having just received the case file.

    “I am seeing this file today because I was called by my CJ that I have this matter .

    “So I am just seeing it. For me to start looking for where your processes are in this voluminous documents may take time,” she said.

    The judge said if the plaintiff would not object, all the processes that needed to be regularised would be deemed to have been properly filed going by the urgency of the matter.

    “So I can make that blanket order that all processes for regularisation should be deemed to be properly filed subject to payment of the relevant fees,” she said.

    However, Akpabio’s lawyer, Ogunwumiju, and Umeh Kalu, SAN, who represented Senator Imasuem, objected to Okutepa’s application.

    Ogunwumiju submitted that there are applications for interlocutory injunction, among others, which are key in the matter.

    “There are issues we have raised in our objection.

    “This is not a matter that can be taken by way of originating motion.

    “We have an application that is ripe to be taken today,” he said

    According to him, since the suit was filed, she (Akpoti-Udiaghan) has been granting interviews, even till today.

    “You cannot be here and be granting interviews with BBC, even CNN,” Ogunwumiju said.

    But Okutepa disagreed with Ogunwumiju on the allegations against his client.

    The lawyer also alleged that a senator in the Senate had been moving about granting interviews with media and issuing press releases allegedly on behalf of the senate president.

    “My lord, we are officers of this court. There is a senator that is always on media interviews.

    “My lord, the duty we own is to respect the court. This senator is also a member of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct.

    “In their report which is in the counter affidavit of the 3rd defendant (Akpabio), my lord will find Senator Onyekachi Nwaebonyi on number 32.

    “He is always speaking on this issue. My submission is let us have decorum, respect the sanctity of the court,” Okutepa said

    Ogunwumiju urged the court to disregard Okutepa’s submission because Sen. Nwaebonyi was not directly a party in the suit.

    Justice Nyako, therefore, ordered all the parties, including their lawyers to refrain from media interviews in order not to render the decision of the court nugatory.

    The judge also ruled and held in favour of Okutepa, saying the court would hear all pending applications, including preliminary objections along with the substantive suit in the next adjourned date.

    She said the preliminary objection would be determine first to know if the court has jurisdiction to entertain the case.

    “If it succeeds, that is the end of the suit and if it does not, the case continues,” she said.

    The judge also granted the applications of parties seeking to regularise their processes since the plaintiff raised no objection.

    She adjourned the matter until May 12 for hearing.

    NAN reports that Justice Egwuatu had, on March 25, recused himself from the suit filed by the suspended senator who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District.

    The suit had sought to stop the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions from going ahead with the disciplinary proceedings over alleged misconduct against the embattled lawmaker.

    Justice Egwuatu had granted Akpoti-Iduaghan’s  five reliefs in the ex-parte motion on March 4, including Order Number Four which declared any action taken by the defendants during the pendency of the suit as null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

    The judge granted the five prayers after Sanusi Musa, SAN, who appeared for Akpoti-Udughan , moved the ex-parte motion  marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan had, in the motion ex-parte, sued clerk of the National Assembly (NASS) and the Senate as 1st and 2nd defendants.

    She also named the President of the Senate, Federal Republic of Nigeria, and Sen. Neda Imasuem, who is the Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct as 3rd and 4th defendants respectively.

    The senator had sought an order of interim injunction restraining the Senate’s committee headed by Imasuem from proceeding with the purported investigation against her for alleged misconduct sequel to the events that occurred at the plenary on Feb. 20, pursuant to the referral by the Senate on Feb. 25, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for interlocutory injunction, among others.

    However on March 6, the Senate suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan following the committee’s report on her alleged gross misconduct, while the suit is still pending.

    But Justice Egwuatu, on March 19, set aside order number four which he granted on March 4, declaring the suspension of Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan  by the Senate as null and void.

    The judge vacated the order following a motion on notice filed by the Senate seeking for the order setting aside the order number four which declared any action taken by the defendants during the pendency of the suit as null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

  • Alleged assassination plot: It’s Senator Natasha’s manipulative theatrics, no such plan – Akpabio

    Alleged assassination plot: It’s Senator Natasha’s manipulative theatrics, no such plan – Akpabio

    The Office of the President of the Senate strongly condemns the recent baseless, false and inflammatory accusation made by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, in which she falsely alleged that the Senate President, His Excellency, Senator Godswill Akpabio, GCON, was involved in a plot to assassinate her.

    While speaking in Kogi State on April 1, 2025, the suspended Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan recklessly and maliciously claimed that Senator Godswill Akpabio “recruited” former Governor Yahaya Bello to “assassinate her in Kogi State rather than in Abuja.” This outrageous accusation is not only false but a complete fabrication and deeply irresponsible and dangerous attempt to provoke public unrest, attract media attention, and discredit the person and office of the President of the Senate for ulterior motives.

    It is important to remind the public that this same individual had previously made an unsubstantiated accusation of sexual harassment against Senator Akpabio—a claim she seem to have abandoned without explanation. Having failed to gain traction with that narrative, she has now escalated her campaign of misinformation to a deadly and defamatory dimension.

    This pattern of deliberate falsehoods and manipulative theatrics reveals a troubling willingness to exploit public sensitivities through recurring victimhood narratives. It is a matter of public record that she has previously made assassination allegations against former Governor Yaya Bello and others in 2019 and 2023, along with multiple unsubstantiated claims of sexual harassment against other dignitaries. Her recurring persecution narrative and evident lying complex should not be weaponized to malign individuals or destroy hard-earned reputations.

    Interestingly, this latest reckless allegation is not occurring in isolation.

    Barely 24 hours later, on April 2, 2025, former Senator Elisha Abbo appeared on Arise Television to revive a previously withdrawn claim that Senator Akpabio “manipulated the judiciary” to secure his removal from the Senate. Nigerians will recall that Mr. Abbo, in 2023, publicly retracted this same accusation and tendered an apology after acknowledging that his claims were founded on incorrect assumptions. His removal from office was the outcome of a constitutionally grounded judicial decision by the Court of Appeal, which independently determined that he was not duly elected to represent Adamawa North.

    In a further twist, Mr. Abbo also alleged that he was denied his entitlements by the Senate President. This, too, is categorically false. Entitlements such as salaries and allowances are processed strictly through administrative and legal procedures. The Senate President does not and cannot unilaterally approve or deny such requests. Any delays or rejections would have been based solely on due diligence and compliance with established protocols.

    The timing, tone, and striking similarity of these coordinated attacks point clearly to a politically motivated smear campaign. These individuals—backed by undisclosed interests—appear united in a desperate effort to undermine the credibility of the Senate and its leadership and intended to distract from their own personal and political shortcomings and failings.
    Senator Godswill Akpabio remains undeterred. As a statesman devoted to national unity, institutional integrity, and the rule of law, he will not be distracted by malicious falsehoods or inflammatory rhetoric.

    Regardless of the necessity for legal redress, formal letters of demand, seeking immediate public retractions, apologies, and compensation for reputational harm, are underway to be served on both Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Mr Elisha Abbo.

    We call on the Nigerian public in particular and the International Community to reject these baseless and provocative narratives. The Senate, under Senator Akpabio’s leadership, remains focused on its constitutional mandate: to promote legislative excellence, safeguard democratic values, and deliver meaningful progress for the Nigerian people.

  • ABRAHAM OGBODO: Hurricane Natasha

    ABRAHAM OGBODO: Hurricane Natasha

    By Abraham Ogbodo

    I had had to change my mind when Natasha happened again on Tuesday. My initial plan was to discuss some other aspect of the unending national tragedy. There are always new scenes and new characters too to talk about. Like Carbon atoms, the Natasha Act has a way of bonding with fresh issues to create new scenes. First, it was a security advisory from both the Kogi State Government and the State Police Command cancelling all forms of rally in Okene or Kogi Central Senatorial Zone. And that was because the Senator representing the zone, Mrs Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, had given notice of coming home to meet her constituents.

    For now, Natasha is like any other woman in the street of Okene. Within the context of our understanding, the prestigious prefix, Senator, is of no direct consequence in the next twenty something weeks at least. She has been suspended for six months from the Senate, beginning March 6, 2025. Her salary, allowances and all privileges including her security aides have been suspended too. All the versions of the story of her suspension have been told over and over again. The Senate has a version called “Breach of Senate Rules.” Natasha herself has a version called “Allegation of Sexual Harassment.” And from both versions, informed and arm-chair commentators have been creating salacious versions of the same story.

    But Natasha has remained logically stable and consistent. She has sustained her case with robust intellect, charisma and delivery. She is gallant. Overall, she has displayed the attributes that readily resonate with many Nigerians and which are lacking in her adversaries. She is shining like a thousand stars in a firmament of complete darkness. Yet Natasha has been stripped of all powers. Technically and substantially, she holds and commands nothing outside her person, to constitute a threat to a chicken. But her person is evolving into a weapon of mass destruction. That is the worry of the other side which cannot put a handle on what to do to stop her. She has strengthened into a Category Five Tropical Storm called *HURRICANE NATASHA* .

    Because Natasha was coming and they didn’t want her to come, a curfew was declared in Kogi Central. She was to be physically prevented from entering her ancestral homestead. Perhaps, it was all part of a scheme to remove her from harm’s way. Her constituents are reportedly angry with her and they could kill her. Their grouse is that she was doing what she was not sent to the Senate to do. She was not sent to quarrel with a certain Godswill Akpabio, but to make laws for the benefit of the people of Kogi Central Senatorial Zone. Since the State Government and State Police Command exist to ensure the safety of life and property, stopping Natasha from entering Okene, became a fundamental duty. They did not want her to enter and be slaughtered like a sallah ram by her own people.

    The thing about Natasha is that she does not take no for a final answer. She loves to be convinced. But if for any reason, you could not adduce enough reasons to anchor an action against her, for the sake of peace, do not resort to intimidation. If you recall very well, this whole drama started when she was asked to sit elsewhere in the Senate. Natasha is a lawyer. When she asked to be persuaded beyond all reasonable doubts that her sudden relocation from Seat A to Seat X on the floor of the Senate had nothing to do with the expansive libido of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, she was suspended for six months and stripped of all benefits. She was accused of making baseless allegations and also denied an opportunity to prove the allegations. Instead of persuasion, she was handed intimidation. I should believe that, before now, no Senator knew Natasha beyond being a colleague from Kogi. If they knew that, like gold, Natasha gets finer with trials, they would have sought some excuse to follow the Constitution instead of the so-called Senate’s House Rules in handling her matter. Akpabio himself would have acted differently and instead of tele-guiding her suspension, he would have most probably made her Chairman of the Senate Committee on Oil and Gas, Customs and any other area of the political economy where money flows like the waters of the Niger.

    The Senate chose to draw a battle line without a good battle plan. In the contest between the eagle and the snake, the battle space is crucial. On ground, the former does not stand a good chance. To overcome, the eagle redraws the combat space and takes the snake off the ground into the air. This is exactly what Natasha has been doing so well since her battle with the Senate started. On her trip home for instance, while the enforcers secured all the entry points on land into Kogi Central, Natasha chose to drop from the sky. It encapsulates the frustrations of a *babalawo* who had laid in wait for his charm to impact. Instead of walking through the minefield, the target drove past in a car and crushed the spell. The spectacle of a descending chopper in a programmed submission to gravity amid an organic crowd of supporters and well wishers spoke volumes. The point was so eloquently made and Natasha didn’t have to address her supporters on anything. She stood tall against her diminished traducers.
    The lie about her recall by her constituents was exploded. If anything, her constituents were itching to reinforce and not to recall her. And they had the opportunity last Tuesday to make it happen. It doesn’t matter what Yahaya Bello or INEC has been programmed to achieve. The fact remains that within that cartographic and geo-political space called Kogi Central Senatorial Zone, Natasha is the undisputed queen. She is the Amazon who leads her troops from the front. She is right in saying she is a free born and that nobody can stop her from going home to see her people. She is not banished from home also. She is only suspended by the Senate which does not amount to suspension from Kogi Central.

    In 1993, the year of the failed presidential election that sparked off the epic struggle for the realisation of this current democracy, Natasha was only 14 years old. She did not even vote in that election. She was disenfranchised by age. Voting age in Nigeria is 18 years and above. She was nowhere close to the theatre of operation when people like Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Kayode Fayemi, Bayo Onanuga, Adams Oshiomhole and others in this character range were fighting for democracy. These ones were crowned champions and defenders of democracy back then by Nigerians. The demons of democracy were persons who stood against democracy. They used to be very many until Gen. Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, who is still standing after causing the presidential election in 1993 to fail, came out recently to say that it was only Sani Abacha, who died in 1998, that was a demon of democracy.

    That point by IBB has become very stale actually. There has been a great deal of morphing and the dividing line between the yesteryears defenders and destroyers of democracy is imperceptible. There appears to be no champions anymore but demons who operate this democracy from law making through law interpretation to law execution. This is the reason Natasha is appearing attractive. She has a small anointing to cast out demons and her crowd is increasing with every of her crusade to dethrone the demons. In a Senate where compromise is a style or virtue and incompetence a duty, the modest gains of little Natasha are already looking superfluous. If you ask me, I would suggest a clear understanding of the etymology of the word SENATE as a requirement for intending Senators of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It is a derivative of the word senior, senescent, both of which are firmly rooted in the Latin word, _Senex_ . It means the Senate is a place for stable, sensible and tested men and women. It is an assembly of persons who have been conditioned by age and experience to understand the real meaning of service to the fatherland. The Senate is not an arena for hustlers and students activists hunting for cheap fortune.

    The French Revolution had marked a turning point in world history. It was the singular event that impacted political cultures in continental Europe. It touched off a steady drift from feudalism and absolute monarchy to parliamentary democracy. But somewhere along the line, the planners of the revolution, like the hitherto champions of democracy in Nigeria, lost focus and drifted into an attrition that got almost all of them consumed. This created the leeway for the emergence of a military upstart called Napoleon Bonaparte to chart an entirely different direction for France. Instead of seriousness, the victory of democracy has come with a complacency, almost an affliction, that is pushing the nation to the precipice. Truth be told, where we are in Nigeria today with democracy is not looking good at all. Might is overwhelming the rule of law. This is what Natasha is saying.

    Before I forget, let me quickly add that I have another perfect reason to support Natasha. *_I_* *_be_* *_Warri_* *_boy_* . She is our wife and we are very proud of her. We don’t like any randy *ette* playing around our wife. Natasha has been able to prioritize her needs. She places higher premium on her right to free expression than her right to the Senate seat. She should be allowed to breathe. Everybody must not bond with the devil to eat in coven. I can say for sure that if the choices become binary, she will vote to forgo the Akpabio-led Senate to express freely on behalf of other women in Nigeria. Natasha is made of a sterner stuff. Her Salary in the Senate, including all allowances, is about N14 million a month. That is not enough to compel her type to eat from the witch’s pot. Her Kogi Central constituency is gradually enlarging into a constituency of the entire country. If this Godswill Akpabio’s Senate keeps saying no to her, Nigerians, especially Nigerian women, shall say yes and appropriate her as a Senator representing all the oppressed people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    And paying her salary and allowances does not look like a problem. If each of us contributes just N100, we shall raise in one swoop, enough to pay her N14 million monthly salary for a life time even if she were to live above 100 years.

    Last warning. Hurricane Natasha has not dissipated. She is still hanging and wrecking, threatening to make a landfall. Nothing stands in the way of a ferocious hurricane. Those standing in her path are advised, in their own interest, to shift positions and make way for her.

    First Published in The_ Nigerian Tribune of March 4, 2025

  • No going back on Natasha’s recall process – Constituents

    No going back on Natasha’s recall process – Constituents

    Some determined constituents of Kogi Central Senatorial District on Thursday vowed never to back down on the recall process of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from the National Assembly.

    Rather, they insisted that they would fine-tune the process.

    The constituents, in a statement issued on Thursday by Salihu Habib, said there was no going back on their resolve to bring the Kogi senator back home.

    They, however, thanked the Independent National Electoral Commission for validating 208,132 (43.86 per cent) signatures in the petition earlier submitted to it for Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recall.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the renewed determination by the concerned constituents was sequel to INEC’s declaration of some defects in the recall petition they had hitherto presented to it.

    INEC had, in a statement on its X handle on Thursday said the petition failed to meet the minimum requirement prescribed by the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    The constituents, who are registered voters of Kogi Central, said that they had mobilised more than the 50 per cent plus one threshold of registered voters and submitted their petition with full documentation.

    They, however, noted that the validation of 43.86 per cent by INEC was a confirmation that Kogi Central constituents had rejected the senator.

    “Apparently, INEC cancelled not less than 35,000 signatures from the administrative signatures collected.

    “We will liaise with INEC within the full ambits of the constitution and regulations to demand for transparency in the handling of our petition.

    “We have utmost confidence in the commission not to subject the recall process to ambiguity or administrative opacity,” they said.

    They expressed gratitude to INEC for proving naysayers, who queried the authenticity of their figures, wrong.

    “We thank INEC for making it clear that the bulk of the people of Kogi Central are behind us and that we did not import a crowd like a desperate, embattled lawmaker,” they said.

    The petitioners insisted that the recall of Akpoti-Uduaghan “for misconduct and divisiveness” was non-negotiable.

    “We are firm in our resolve to restore dignified and collaborative representation to Kogi Central senatorial district. We will no longer indulge someone who will do and say anything just to remain politically relevant.

    “The whole of Nigeria watched her deceptive rally last Tuesday where she openly made comments capable of setting, not just Kogi State, but Nigeria ablaze.

    “We will pursue all lawful and constitutional means to ensure our voices are heard and respected. After God, power belongs to the people,” they stated.