Tag: Niger Republic

  • Coup: Burkina Faso, Mali deploy fighter jets in Niger Republic in readiness for ECOWAS

    Coup: Burkina Faso, Mali deploy fighter jets in Niger Republic in readiness for ECOWAS

    West African countries of Burkina Faso and Mali have jointly deployed fighter jets to Niger Republic in readiness for any Military action that could be taken by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) forces in the country.

    Burkina Faso and Mali warned that any military intervention in Niger would be considered a declaration of war against them.

    Recall that ECOWAS had threatened to declare war on Niger Republic if the junta failed to reinstate the democratically elected president, Mohamed Bazoum.

    However, both governments said any military intervention in Niger would destabilise the region.

    A joint statement by both governments reads partly: “The disastrous consequences of a military intervention in Niger could destabilise the entire region.”

  • The military coup in Niger and ECOWAS rascality – By Hope Eghagha

    The military coup in Niger and ECOWAS rascality – By Hope Eghagha

    So it was that the khaki boys of impoverished Niger Republic slipped that miserable country back into the Stone Age practice of violently overthrowing an elected government, following the footsteps of Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Mali, and threatening to kill the deposed president. Though bloodless, in the aftermath of the coup, there are threats of spilling blood, that is, if the rampaging mobs have not killed some unfortunate politicians. The mob! They were angry with the political class and trooped out to say so. Enough of the bloody politicians, they seemed to say!

    In a very dramatic and breezy manner, ECOWAS under the headship of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, virtually declared war on the coup plotters without giving diplomacy a chance. It was an example of reckless bravado from an ECOWAS conglomeration of pseudo-democrats who were more interested in their survival than the plight of the hoi polloi of Niger Republic! Good enough ECOWAS has backtracked somewhat, an illustration of the fact that the leaders of that regional body did not take into cognizance the total factors before the saber-rattling that followed the coup!

    The junta leaders have promised to defend their fatherland. They have gone a step further to declare that if Niger is invaded, they would kill the deposed president first! Blood is smelling. Lined up behind the ‘revolutionary’ soldiers are the ordinary people of Niger who have vowed to defend the new government with their tears, sweat and blood. To complete the picture of potentially explosive anarchy, Russia has nudged itself into the defender of the regime change with the loud innuendoes that the Wagner group will rise to the occasion should there be hostilities. Added to this the level of insurgent activities in the subregion. How could anybody have thought that a regional conflagration would be the panacea to coups in sub-Saharan Africa? Common sense is not common!

    America, France, and Germany have all lined up behind the deposed president, mainly because of their selfish economic interests – uranium and other mineral deposits locked in the belly of one of the poorest countries in the world. Until the coup, I never knew that the western powers had a dangerously close spy centre next door to Nigeria. How could we have known that Niger the Poor was home to thousands of wealthy and strategic Americans, French, and German nationals? The resentment against France was palpable. If Africa came of age under Murtala Mohammed, Niger and much of Francophone Africa were left behind in that journey towards self-discovery. Removing poverty-stricken West African countries from the stranglehold of French imperialism is one of the reasons for coups in French West Africa. In other words, France is the devil that must be destroyed in the Armageddonic battle of liberation!

    As a result, the rhetoric emanating from the lips of the coup plotters is reminiscent of the revolutionary sentiments of the 1970s and 1980s when the evil empire represented by the world capital of capitalism had to be brought down in a people’s revolution. Bob Marley belted out tunes that aided the revolutionary ethos for us struggling undergraduates of that period. The rhetoric of the Niamey Junta was also reminiscent of the anti-democratic spirit which enveloped Africa shortly after independence in the 1960s. Nigerians as well as Ghanaians and some other countries were fed up with the antics of greedy politicians and welcomed the ‘corrective regimes’ of army mis-adventurers in power! Until the IBB and Abacha years, the façade of the military rulers as redeemers of the people held a blindfold over our eyes!

    The real antidote to coups is good and responsible governance. Of course, I stand fully against any overthrow of elected officials. It is however instructive that anybody who massively rigs himself into power is guilty of a coup against the people. It is this grey area that somewhat encourages the messianic spirit in the military. We do not need them in Nigeria or in the world. We must however call out Senate President Godswill Akpabio for his utterances which showed a complete disregard and disrespect for the people. If the poor people had their way, they would recall that man from the senate. How could a former governor, former minister and senator be so insensitive to the horrible economic and social conditions in the country?

    There should be no regional war in West Africa. The leaders of the junta should be persuaded and pressured into giving up their ambition to rule over Niger. The western powers must know that the game is up. They have taken enough for the owner to notice. A fair deal should be negotiated for the country. Such repudiation of colonial agreements must be extended to all the countries in Africa. Except this is done, there will be more coups. As for those who argue that in some countries there can be no coups because of strong anti-coup obstacles forget that soldiers are trained to overcome obstacles!

    President Tinubu should concentrate on Nigeria. He is carrying an elephant on his head, considering the nature of challenges which he has inherited. He should not allow himself to be dragged into a war whose end we cannot predict.  Nigeria and the situation in Niger are deeper and more complicated than any flourish display for the beauty and restoration of democracy. The tensions arising from postcolonial oppression and strangulation are deep in Francophone Africa. It is a lesson in the tyranny of the oppressor, immorality, and insane wickedness and greed of the French government. At the end of this whole crisis, the African Union as a body should stand firmly with the nations that are still tied to the apron strings of France and repudiate the obnoxious agreement – The Pact for the continuation of Colonisation – which was recently thrown into the public domain by Arikana Chihombori-Quao, former African Union Representative to the UN. How could this nonsense continue to stand in the 21st century?

    At press time, the junta leaders had agreed to hold talks with ECOWAS representatives. This followed a toning down of reprisal rhetoric by gung-ho merchants of war and force. Other African countries should look deep in their wells and ensure that there are no angry gunmen in their barracks waiting for an opportunity to strike. Indeed, the only antidote to coups is good and responsible governance. Where the people continue to see a huge disparity between appalling conditions of their lives and the opulence of the privileged few, evil thoughts will begin to enter their minds. We don’t need any crazy adventurers in Nigeria. Nobody should encourage them by design or default.

  • Niger coup: What I discussed with Putin – Mali’s military leader

    Niger coup: What I discussed with Putin – Mali’s military leader

    Mali’s military leader Assimi Goita said on Tuesday that he had spoken on the phone to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the situation in Niger, where a junta seized power in a coup last month.

    Putin “stressed the importance of a peaceful resolution of the situation for a more stable Sahel,” Goita said on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

    Western powers fear that Niger could go the same way as neighbouring Mali, whose leaders hired mercenaries from Russia’s Wagner group to help them fight an insurgency after they overthrew the democratic government three years ago and kicked out French troops.

    Putin has called for a return to constitutional order in Niger, while Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin welcomed the coup.

    Support for Russia has appeared to surge in Niger since the July 26 coup, with junta supporters waving Russian flags at several rallies.

  • Apply more pressure on Niger junta – U.S. tells Tinubu

    Apply more pressure on Niger junta – U.S. tells Tinubu

    The United States has urged the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) led by President Bola Tinubu not to put its foot off the pedal on recent events in Niger Republic.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the U.S. told President Tinubu in a phone call to apply more pressure to ensure ousted President Mohamed Bazoum and his family were released.

    U.S. Secretary of State, Antony Blinken had a phone conversation with Tinubu on Monday, according to a statement by his spokesperson, Matthew Miller.

    According to the statement, Blinken commended President Tinubu’s leadership of the ECOWAS Second Extraordinary Summit on the situation in the Republic of Niger.

    “He noted the importance of maintaining pressure on the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP) to restore constitutional order and to see President Mohamed Bazoum and his family released,” the statement reads.

    The statement reads in full: “Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Nigerian President Bola Tinubu.

    “The Secretary commended President Tinubu’s leadership of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Second Extraordinary Summit on the situation in the Republic of Niger.

    “He noted the importance of maintaining pressure on the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP) to restore constitutional order and to see President Mohamed Bazoum and his family released”.

  • Niger junta: NLC counsels ECOWAS on use of military force

    Niger junta: NLC counsels ECOWAS on use of military force

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has counselled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) on the use of military force to remove the military junta in Niger Republic.

    The NLC President, Mr Joe Ajaero, gave the advice in a statement signed by him on Sunday in Abuja.

    It would be recalled that at the end of the second extraordinary summit of the Authority of ECOWAS (Committee of Heads of State/Governments) on Aug. 10 issued a terse statement to deploy military might to restore democracy in Niger.

    The statement had directed the Committee of Chiefs of Defence Staff to activate the ECOWAS standby force with all its elements immediately.

    It also said the deployment of the ECOWAS standby force is to restore constitutional order in the Republic of Niger.

    It also said this was in order to “underscore its continued commitment to restoring constitutional order through peaceful means”.

    According to Ajaero, this is a euphemism for war, immediate war on Niger Republic, our consistently most peaceful neighbour.

    “It will amount to stating the obvious that we at the Nigeria Labour Congress are averse to military rule.

    “Indeed the history of the struggle for democratic rule in Nigeria cannot be complete without mentioning the illustrious contribution of the Labour Movement.

    “Despite our unimpeachable credentials in the popular struggle against military rule, we would strongly counsel against the use of military force to remove the military junta in Niger Republic,” he said.

    He added that the disadvantages clearly outweigh the benefits, from putting in danger the lives of the deposed President Bazoum and his family to the destabilisation of the entire region.

    He said this include Northern Nigeria and loss of many lives in and out of the battle field.

    Ajaero said that equally of significance is the unintended possibility of turning Niger into a fertile territory for proxy wars.

    “Even after the war is over, the region must brace itself for raised acts of terrorism or insurgency.

    “This is just as it might signal the end of ECOWAS as we know it today given the scenario of 10 members fighting five,” he said.

    The NLC president also said suspicions were rife that the ECOWAS leadership was trying to pull out of the fire the nut for and on behalf of another or others.

    He added that while we cannot ascertain the veracity of these claims, ECOWAS must conduct itself in such a manner that its citizens and the world would believe it has a mind of its own.

    “Coupled with this, we at the Congress have reason to believe that ECOWAS in part is victim of its double standards or discriminatory policies.

    “As it was in some instances seen as condoning and even celebrating coups.

    “In the extant matter of Niger Republic, we equally do believe that ECOWAS did not exhaust the process of dialogue before beating war drums.

    “The missions to Niamey were seen as an afterthought,” he said.

    He noted that one of the consequences of weaponising electricity supply to Niger Republic was the right of proportionate responsorial action.

    He also that was by way of Niger Republic damming the Niger River with unimaginable effects on our echo system.

    “Beyond all this, time has come for us to ask ourselves if we have the economic strength to prosecute this war.

    “Even seasoned Generals do admit that we can often predict the beginning of wars but can seldom tell how they end.

    “As we stated at the beginning of this statement, we are advocates of democracy and will do all that is necessary to promote and preserve it.

    “However, what will preserve democracy in our territories will not be the threat or use of military force against sovereign nations but the observance of the core values and rules of democracy,” he said.

    Ajaero added that this is up to our Presidents or political leaders to do the needful.

    “It is in consideration of these that we join other organisations and respected voices in saying ‘No to War’”, he said.

  • When the American hawk decides to devour the Nigerien chick – By Owei Lakemfa

    When the American hawk decides to devour the Nigerien chick – By Owei Lakemfa

    THE threat of the mighty United States of America, USA, on Tuesday, August 7, 2023  to invade little Niger Republic is not for its love of democracy, Nigeriens or Africans. It is basically in the nature of hawks to circle the sky looking for prey, especially chicks.

    There were American and French troops in Niger before the coup because it is in the nature of black vultures, not only to target and kill small live animals, but also to have the patience to wait and devour carcases.

    So, the July 26 military coup in Niger Republic is a pretext. The USA Acting Deputy Secretary, Victoria Nuland, in   threatening to invade Niger, declared in the usual American arrogant manner: “So we’ll be watching the situation, but we understand our legal responsibilities and I explained those very clearly to the guys (the new Nigerien  leaders) who were responsible for this and that it is not our desire to go there, but they may push us to that point, and we asked them to be prudent in that regard and to hear our offer to try to work with them to solve this diplomatically and return to constitutional order.”

    When the USA brags it has “legal responsibilities”, I ask: under what law, convention or agreement? Does it intend to engineer another bogus United Nations Resolution under which along with its Western allies, they destroyed Iraq, turning it into a basket case? Does it intend as it did with the birds of prey of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, NATO, to invade Niger as it did Libya under Ghadaffi, turning one of the richest and most promising African countries into a another basket case?

    The Western actions in Libya were so destructive that it resulted in the free flow of arms and terrorists into West Africa. They so dislocated Libya that, today, a dozen years later, that country remains a failed state with rival governments in Tripoli, Tobruk, Sirte and Benghazi where the Libyan-American ‘Field Marshall’ Khalifa Haftar holds sway.

    If the USA were truly opposed to coups, then it won’t be a supporter of the coup plotter in Chad, General Mehmet Deby or his older coup plotter in Egypt, General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. No! If the USA were for democracy and against coups, it would not have overthrown democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh of Iran in 1953 and imposed a monarch, Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, in his place. The Americans would not have overthrown elected Presidents Jacobo Arbenz of Guatemala in 1954 and Salvador Allende on September 11, 1973. If the American establishment were for elected leaders, it would not have teamed up with Belgium and the United Kingdom to overthrow newly elected Congo Democratic Republic Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, in January 1961 who they subsequently captured and executed on  January 17, 1961.

    If in deed the USA were for human rights, freedom or democracy, it would not have been the greatest supporter of apartheid South Africa. It would not have designated African freedom fighters  like Walter Sisulu, Oliver Thambo and Joe Slovo as terrorists. It is to the eternal shame of the USA that despite Nelson Mandela spending 27 years in apartheid prison, leading South Africa to freedom and serving as the first democratically elected President of his country, America continued to officially designate him a terrorist!

    In fact, it was not until July 2008 President George W. Bush signed a bill into law removing Mandela and other African National Congress, ANC, leaders from the list of persons the USA categorise as  people who engage in “terrorist or criminal activities.”

    If the USA were opposed to colonialism, it would not continue to colonise Puerto Rico for 125 years now after seizing that country from colonial Spain on October 18, 1898. With America illegally occupying their homeland, Puerto Ricans are not allowed any voting representation in the American Federal Government. As I write, where African Americans, American  Indians and migrants can vote in midterm or American presidential elections,  Puerto Ricans have no such right.

    If the USA were law abiding, it would not, like bandits, have seized by force, Mexican territories, including New Mexico, California, Nevada, Utah and parts of  Kansas, Wyoming and Oklahoma. If it were peace loving, it would not have invaded Mexico 10 times and Southern American countries over 70 times! The countries so invaded include Haiti  from 1915 to 1934, Guatemala in 1954, Cuba at the Bay of Pigs in 1961, Dominican Republic in 1965 and Grenada in 1983.

    The Americans invaded Nicaragua so many times that I am not sure either side continued counting. This includes the USA occupation of that country from 1912 to 1933 and its 1980 and 1984 invasions. The USA rape of Nicaragua was so routine and criminal that even a private American physician and lawyer called William Walker raised a private army in 1855 to invade Nicaragua. In July 1856, Walker declared himself President of Nicaragua and his illegal regime was recognised by USA under President Franklin Pierce as the legitimate government of Nicaragua! Given the US backing of his terrorist regime, Walker re-introduced slave trade and threatened the re-colonisation of some Central American countries.

    The USA did not call its citizen to order; it was a coalition of Latin American countries led by Costa Rica that defeated the Walker mercenaries and forced him to resign as Nicaraguan President on May 1, 1857.

    When the Vietnamese defeated the French colonialists in the historic Battle of Dien Bien Phu which raged from  March 13 to May 7, 1954, and declared  independence, the USA was enraged. It thought it was a bad precedence for a Third World people to roundly defeat a Western power. It was a battle in which the Vietnamese lost over 3,000 men and  the French lost over 8,000 men with 10,300 soldiers taken prisoner.  The US in March, 1965 invaded Vietnam to reverse the Vietnamese independence and allegedly, to stop the country going socialist.

    The USA invaded Afghanistan in 2001 following the 9/11 attack, and was forced into a disgraceful and disorganised withdrawal in August 2021 which the Washington  Post of August 10, 2022 headlined, “Two weeks of chaos: A timeline of the US pull out of Afghanistan.”

    If the USA claims it is supporting Ukraine because it believes every country should have a right to sovereignty, why does it want to invade Niger; that it has no right to sovereignty?

    The USA threat of invading Niger is not  in the interest of the African people. An  African saying advises that we should first chase away the hawk before reverting to the chick. Let us first protect Niger from vultures before using  diplomacy to  address the coup question.

  • Niger Republic is still owing Nigeria  N4.22bn for electricity supply – NERC

    Niger Republic is still owing Nigeria N4.22bn for electricity supply – NERC

     

    The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) recent quarterly report has revealed that Niger Republic is owing Nigeria N4.22bn ($5.48m) for electricity provision.

    In 2022, 70% of Niger’s share of electricity was purchased from the Nigerian business Mainstream, according to a report by NIGELEC, the country’s sole electricity supplier.

    The electricity Nigeria supplies to Niger Republic  is being produced by Kanji Dam in Niger State.

     

    Although, Niger is working to finish its first dam by 2025 to break its energy dependence on Nigeria, until the Junta took over the helms of affairs, Nigeria was still supplying them  about 50% of power used in the Country..

    The report read, “None of the under-listed international customers made any payment against the cumulative $16.11m invoice issued to them in 2023/Q1; Paras-SBEE ($3.46m), Transcorp-SBEE ($3.85 million), Mainstream-NIGELEC ($5.48m) and Odukpani-CEET ($3.32 million).

    Recall that on July 26, the military junta overthrew the democratically elected government in Niger.

    As a result of a failed diplomatic solution, the Niger junta cut its ties with Nigeria.

    Nigeria retaliated by cutting the electricity supplies to Niger.

    The regional tension escalated as ECOWAS ordered the deployment of a standby military force following the refusal of the Niger junta to restore democracy.

  • Niger Coup: 14th Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II meets Junta in Niamey

    Niger Coup: 14th Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II meets Junta in Niamey

    In a bid to find a lasting solution to the crisis in Niger Republic, the 14th Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi  Lamido II, has met with the military junta in Niamey the capital of Niger.

    It was gathered that the coup plotters were happy to meet the Emir from Nigeria.

    An unconfirmed source revealed that the coup leaders took time to listen to the requests of the Emir, among which was for them to give a window of amicable resolutions to the problems.

    Sanusi who was escorted to Niamey, capital of Niger Republic by some of his closest associates and staff, was warmly received by the new military junta.

    Findings show that the meeting focused on the way out of the crisis bedeviling the country.

    ECOWAS leaders are scheduled to meet on Thursday for the next line of actions after the seven-day deadline given to the coupists elapsed.

    Earlier, President Bola Tinubu of Nigeria has said that ECOWAS hasn’t ruled out the use of force to return democratic rule in Niger.

    However, more sanctions have been imposed on Niger by ECOWAS, Nigeria, United States and France.

  • Tinubu holds crucial meeting with state governors sharing border with Niger Republic

    Tinubu holds crucial meeting with state governors sharing border with Niger Republic

    President Bola Tinubu engaged in crucial consultations with governors from states sharing borders with the neighboring Niger Republic. The gathering served as a vital platform for the President to address the escalating situation in Niger Republic.

    The closed-door meeting saw the presence of notable attendees, including Sokoto State governor, Ahmed Aliyu; Jigawa State governor, Umar Namadi; Yobe State governor, Mai Mala Buni; Kebbi State governor, Idris Nasir, and Katsina State governor, Dikko Radda.

    The State House in Abuja provided the venue for this high-level meeting, which lasted for an undisclosed duration. As of now, no formal statement has been issued, leaving the public curious about the outcome of the discussions between President Tinubu and the five state governors.

    The meeting comes amid growing concerns over the security situation in the neighboring Niger Republic, which shares borders with several Nigerian states. The stakeholders’ discussion is expected to have addressed issues pertaining to regional security, cross-border trade, and cooperation between the two nations.

    President Tinubu’s engagement with the state governors holds significance as it indicates the Nigerian government’s commitment to fostering collaboration and finding solutions to the challenges affecting the region’s stability.

    As the situation unfolds, citizens and the international community are eagerly awaiting an official statement on the outcomes of the meeting. The implications of this gathering extend beyond regional borders, potentially shaping the future relations between Nigeria and Niger Republic.

    The President’s willingness to engage in such consultations demonstrates the importance of diplomatic efforts in addressing regional challenges. Stakeholders and the public will be closely monitoring any further developments resulting from this critical meeting.

     

  • Think twice before declaring war on Niger Republic – Bode Geoge warns Tinubu

    Think twice before declaring war on Niger Republic – Bode Geoge warns Tinubu

    As tension continues to build over possible confrontation with the military junta in Niger Republic, a former Deputy National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olabode George, has warned President Bola Tinubu to think twice before declaring war on the Niger Republic.

    George in a letter he personally wrote to the President, noted that it is better for him to continue the diplomatic channel instead of embarking on a “needless war.”

    The PDP chieftain also warned that adopting the military approach could result in the collapse of the Economic Community of West African States.

    “We should think twice before entering another country militarily. Don’t start what you cannot finish. Niger is one of the largest (land border) countries in the world and also one of the poorest.

    What exactly do we gain if we go to war in Niger? What? So that people can praise us as a defender of democracy? When people are dying at home, do we need that type of commendation from anybody?

    “I am a retired General. So, I know that war is not easy. Please, don’t force Nigerians to engage in an endless war”

    According to him, Tinubu must be circumspect in his actions because he cannot trust the other nations pressuring him to go to war with Niger.

    “In Nigeria today, there is no food, no financial power to buy fuel, no light, no money. Nigerians psychologically stranded and people are really going through a lot. So, I don’t know what our going to Niger Republic with full military power will achieve.”