Tag: NJC

  • Is the NJC failing the judiciary? – By Dave Baro-Thomas

    Is the NJC failing the judiciary? – By Dave Baro-Thomas

    Judicial misconduct and corruption are global phenomena that portend grave danger for society and, no doubt, a national emergency. The point when the chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission, ICPC, declared the judiciary the most corrupt in terms of the incredible amount of bribes offered to judges handling political and electoral cases was the needed cue to “shut down” the entire system and demand surgical reforms- because as Justice Samson Uwaifo, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court puts it, “a corrupt judge is more harmful than a man who runs amok wielding a dagger in a crowded street. While the man can be physically restrained, the corrupt Judge deliberately destroys the foundation of society”.

    With little attention paid to the continuous impropriety of some judges, curiously, the Attorney General of the Federation, AGF, and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, admonishes politicians to restraint from casting aspersions on the integrity of the judiciary but plays blind to the reality that it takes two to play the game of corruption. Interestingly, we have seen sparks here and there of retired Supreme Court Justices coming out to have frank conversations and attempt some house cleaning, but only at their valedictory services because they were to be seen and not heard while in service.

    The confines of the courtrooms are a sanctuary with one god or a collection of gods called the Magistrates, Judges or Justices, depending on the tiers of the court in question. The Judge, or whatever is applicable, holds the key to life or death, and a stroke of the gavel could take the rights and privileges of any individual irrespective of class, influence or status, and everyone standing before an impartial Judge prays to higher gods for help, especially if one has a bad case. So, the verdict of a judge could either make or mar anyone depending on the body of evidence before his lordship – so we think!

    While subjecting evidence to the sanctity of the laws or constitution, the interpretive latitude and prerogatives of the judges cannot be discountenanced, and the possibilities for human frailties or induced miscarriage of justice, yet the judgement of any sitting judge is final and binding without any liability on the Judge.

    The appellate court’s judgement in the matter between the sitting governor of Kano state, Abba Kabir Yusuf of the NNPP and his rival,  Nasir Yusuf Gawuna of the APC, is making what looks like a cracked judiciary, broken and derailed in the eyes of Nigerians, and the facts of the matter about some critical contents of the CTC copy being in dissonance with the verdict at the court during judgement, is lavishly discussed in the public courts. Indeed, these are strange times for the judiciary, and it staggers the very foundation of the entire judicial system, given the allegedly questionable verdicts emanating from the court in this electoral circle.

    The Nigerian judiciary has never come under such intense scrutiny, blackmail or disparagement by the public before now. The criticism rages like a broken dam, and the consequences could be far-reaching if the keepers of the gate fold their hands and watch helplessly. The position of the respected AGF that the judiciary should have some respite is unattainable because he knows unequivocally that no sane Nigeria will take on the revered judiciary if there is no room for doubts.

    What could embolden the politicians and the Nigerian public to poke their fingers in the eyes of the judiciary, the AGF wonders, or maybe pretending about it? It was this same APC government under the penultimate President, General Buhari, rtd, that opened the floodgate for the near desecration of the judiciary when the then Chief Justice of the Federation, Justice Walter Onnoghen, was dragged to the market square and strapped naked before Nigerians – rubbishing the sanctity of the judiciary in this country.

    With the Chief Justice of the Federation sacked and the controversies surrounding that action still questioned, in commando style, the houses of some the justices of the Supreme Court were raided like dens of common criminals on account of very unprintable and unverifiable claims as they were hounded, embarrassed and dragged by the secret police under that administration but coincidental today, it was one of those justices that led the Supreme Court which gave victory to the present administration that the current attorney general is serving, did money change hands? So, the need for caution in the pursuit of political interest, is golden.

    If the Federal government, with access to intelligence, can say at a time that the judiciary is corrupt and it was cancer stifling democracy, what else can the average Nigerian do?

    This singular issue from Kano state has thrown up countless questions about the sacredness of the judiciary and the impartiality of our judges, corruption and sharp practices. Will it not amount to selective inertia to forget how 14 out of 15 Justices of the Supreme Court accused the then CJN, Tanko Muhammad, of corruption, incompetence and maladministration? Among the litanies of allegations of corruption in the judiciary by retired justices and that of retired Justice Dattijo ruling the airwaves currently, almost every respected lawyer in this country is shouting that there is corruption in the judiciary. It is about time judges answered their fathers’ names and defended their integrity individually because it appears the National Judicial Commission, NJC, lacks the will to save the judiciary from this downward trajectory.

    The spectrum has even stretched to the recruitment criteria and processes of these judges or justices, pitching professors of law, respectable legal luminaries and renowned men of the silk against each other. So, instead of making a feeble attempt at shielding the judiciary from constructive criticism, why not start the processes of house cleaning and deep reforms from within, but the NJC seems to have other pressing need than saving the judiciary.

    How can anyone forget so soon the accusation against this current CJN of holding secret meetings with the then candidates and now president, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu? While such allegations cannot be substantiated or could as well pass for a beer parlour rants of men working at their bottles, it opens the mind of any keen observer to the perceived image damage of the judiciary, otherwise why will a Tinubu meet a CJN outside the country to influence him, a political novice or nonentity wouldn’t do that how much more a political behemoth like the current president.

    So, the first port of call, it is unmistaken from the groundswell of insinuations in the public court that one of the biggest problems in the judiciary is the NJC, the body entrusted with the responsibility of appointing or recruiting judges, equipping them for the job, ensure their welfare and sanction erring ones but have they lived up to this billing – the results are out there.

    Despite all the hue and cry from critical stakeholders, the feeble interventions from the NJC belie the required capacity, competence and operational governance to salvage this bastion arm of government. Nigerians demand for an overhaul of the judiciary, and until are disciplined, punished stringently and held accountable for their actions, the progressive decline is inevitable.

    But, If the NJC is politicized, insensitive, patronizing, nepotistic, corrupt and undemocratic in its processes and handling of matters, could there be any hope for the judiciary? Today, we cry about corruption in the judiciary as it relates to electoral and political cases, so what can we say of every criminal, civil and commercial case, especially the one where money can influence the outcomes? Judiciary save thyself or remain in ignominy and utter disrespect, because this NJC looks like a paid undertaker.

  • Osun Justice recommended for compulsory retirement

    Osun Justice recommended for compulsory retirement

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended the compulsory retirement of Justice S. O. Falola of Osun State High Court from the Bench.

    The Director of Information, NJC, disclosed this in a statement on Thursday in Abuja.

    He said that the recommendation was made sequel to the findings of an Investigation Committee in a petition written against His Lordship by Mr Dapo Olowo and Polaris Bank.

    Falola had granted a Garnishee Order Absolute against the Bank for the sum of N283,174,000.00 in a questionable and strange manner.

    He equally endorsed the order, attaching the account of the garnishee with another garnishee and not the account of the  judgment debtor who had the legal obligation to pay the supposed judgement sum.

    The committee found out that the Judge misconducted himself by entertaining suit No HIK/41/2018 when there was no evidence of a judgement of the Kwara State High Court before him, neither was there a Certificate of Registration of same in Osun State to confer jurisdiction on him.

    It further found out that the conduct of the subject Judge travelled to Lagos to visit the Counsel of the bank in his Chambers on the issue of garnishee proceedings, unbecoming of the standard expected of a judicial officer.

    Consequently, the council resolved to recommend him to Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State for compulsory retirement with immediate effect.

    It said y in the exercise of its disciplinary powers under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, the NJC has suspended Falola from office pending the approval of the recommendation of his compulsory retirement by the governor.

    The Council also considered the reports of other Investigation Committees that had concluded their sittings, and dismissed the petitions written against some judges for being unmeritorious, or withdrawal of petition by the petitioners.

    They are Justices Ekaete F. F. Obot, Chief Judge, Akwa Ibom State, Benson C. Anya of High Court Abia State, Z. B. Abubakar of Federal High Court, Opufaa Ben-Whyte and Augusta Uche K. Chuku of the High Court of Rivers State.

    However, Justice A. I. Akobi of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory is to be issued a letter of guidance to take proper charge and control of his court.

    The Plenary also considered the report of its three Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committees on 51 fresh petitions written against Federal and State Judicial Officers.

    It thereafter, decided to constitute 11 panels to investigate petitions that had merits and dismissed the remaining petitions for being subjudice, having been withdrawn, and the subject judges having retired from service.

    The Council also resolved to report A. A. Aribisala, SAN to Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC) for investigation and disciplinary action, for the unpalatable and derogatory remarks he made against a judicial officer and by extension, the NJC in his petition to the council.

    It considered and declined the request of Gov. Ademola Adeleke of Osun State requesting its permission to swear in the next most senior judge in the state in the acting capacity, following allegations levelled against Justice Adepele Ojo, Chief Judge, Osun State and the resolution of the State House of Assembly to suspend him.

    The Council affirmed that Ojo is still the recognised Chief Judge of Osun State, and would not work on the resolution of a State House of Assembly, as it is the only body constitutionally empowered to investigate judicial officers and recommend same for any action to the Governor. Consequently, Osun State should revert to status quo.

    It also received notification of retirements of seven judicial officers and notification of deaths of six serving judicial officers of the federal and state courts.

  • What we are doing to fill vacancies at Supreme Court – NJC

    What we are doing to fill vacancies at Supreme Court – NJC

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has disclosed it is following laid down processes to fill vacancies at the Supreme Court.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Mr Soji Oye, Director of Information of NJC made the disclosure on Sunday in Abuja.

    Mr Oye made the disclosure while making clarifications on NJC receiving a nomination list for Supreme Court vacancies from the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

    He said he never had any discussion regarding the list of justices from FJSC for nominations to the Supreme Court with anybody.

    While Oye did not confirm or disprove the names on the 22-man shortlist in circulation, he insisted that reports on such matters are always by official press statement from the Council through his office.

    The NJC spokesperson cautioned against unverified reports regarding the apex court nominations and the process being followed to fill vacancies on the bench.

    Based on the depletion in number of Justices due to retirement and deaths, it was reported that the FJSC had submitted a shortlist to address the vacant positions.

    However, Oye called for caution for the public not to mis-informed.

  • The shortlist of 22 justices for Supreme Court’ not brought to our knowledge – NJC

    The shortlist of 22 justices for Supreme Court’ not brought to our knowledge – NJC

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has explained that it was not carried along with the shortlist of 22 justices made by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) for the bench of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

    According to the NJC’s Director of Information, Barrister Soji Oye, the nomination has not been brought to his knowledge.

    The FJSC reportedly sent a list of 22 justices from the Court of Appeal for consideration by the NJC for elevation to the apex court.

    The FJSC list, released on Thursday, showed a regional distribution of nominees, with North-Central and South East each having six nominees, and North-East, South-West, and South-South each having two nominees, while North-West has four nominees.

    This announcement followed the disclosure in September 2023 that the Supreme Court’s justices had diminished to 10 as against the 21 stipulated by the Constitution.

    Below is the list of the nominated justices:

    SOUTH WEST:

    Hon Justice Adewale Abiru (Lagos State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Olubunmi Oyewole (Osun State)—Reserve

    SOUTH EAST

    Hon Justice Nwaoma Uwa (Abia State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Onyekachi Otisi (Abia State)—Reserve

    Hon Justice Obande Ogbuinya (Ebonyi State)-Priority

    Hon Justice Theresa Orji-Abadua (Imo State)—Reserve

    Hon Justice Anthony Ogakwu (Enugu State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme (Imo State)—Reserve

    SOUTH-SOUTH:

    Hon Justice Moore Adumein (Bayelsa State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Biobele Georgewill (Rivers State)–Reserve

    NORTH WEST:

    Hon Justice Muhammad Lawal Shuaibu (Jigawa State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Bello Aliyu (Zamfara State)—Reserve

    Hon Justice Abubakar Sadiq Umar (Kebbi State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Abdullahi Mahmud Bayero (Kano State)—Reserve

     

    NORTH CENTRAL:

    Hon Jummai Sankey (Plateau State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Muhammad Ibrahim Sirajo (Plateau State)—Reserve

    Hon Justice Stephen Adah (Kogi State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Ridman Maiwada Abdullahi (Nassarawa State)—Reserve

    Hon Justice Baba Idris (Niger State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Joseph Ikyegh (Benue State)—Reserve

    NORTH EAST:

    Hon Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani (Bauchi State)—Priority

    Hon Justice Abubakar Talba (Adamawa State)

     

     

  • FULL LIST: Judicial commission nominates 22 new Supreme Court Justices

    FULL LIST: Judicial commission nominates 22 new Supreme Court Justices

    The Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) has nominated 22 Justices of the Court of Appeal to the National Judicial Council (NJC) for elevation to the Supreme Court.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports the names of the nominees, who hail from various regions of the country, were revealed in a document by the FJSC on Thursday.

    The list of the 22 Justices of the Appeal Court of Appeal nominated by the FJSC for elevation to the Supreme Court, according to the document, has been sent to the NJC.

    TNG observed the North-Central region has six nominees and the South-East region also has six nominees. While the South-West and South-South regions have two nominees each, the North-East has two nominees as well.

    See full list of the nominees below:

    SOUTH-EAST

    1. Hon Justice Nwaoma Uwa (Abia State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Onyekachi Otisi (Abia State) -Reserve
    3. Hon Justice Obande Ogbuinya (Ebonyi State)-Priority
    4. Hon Justice Theresa Orji-Abadua (Imo State)- Reserve
    5. Hon Justice Anthony Ogakwu (Enugu State)-Priority
    6. Hon Justice Chioma Nwosu-lheme (Imo State)-Reserve

    SOUTH-SOUTH

    1. Hon Justice Moore Adumein (Bayelsa State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Biobele Georgewill (Rivers State)-Reserve

    SOUTH-WEST

    1. Hon Justice Adewale Abiru (Lagos State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Olubunmi Oyewole (Osun State)-Reserve

    NORTH-CENTRAL

    1. Hon Jummai Sankey (Plateau State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Muhammad Ibrahim Sirajo (Plateau)-Reserve
    3. Hon Justice Stephen Adah (Kogi State)-Priority
    4. Hon Justice Ridman Maiwada Abdullahi (Nassarawa State) -Reserve
    5. Hon Justice Baba Idris (Niger State)-Priority
    6. Hon Justice Joseph Ikyegh (Benue State)-Reserve

    NORTH-EAST

    1. Hon Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani (Bauchi State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Abubakar Talba (Adamawa State)

    NORTH-WEST

    1. Hon Justice Muhammad Lawal Shuaibu (Jigawa State)-Priority
    2. Hon Justice Bello Aliyu (Zamfara State) -Reserve
    3. Hon Justice Abubakar Sadiq Umar (Kebbi State)-Priority
    4. Hon Justice Abdullahi Mahmud Bayero (Kano State)-Reserve
  • NJC told to relocate Delta election matters to Abuja

    NJC told to relocate Delta election matters to Abuja

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has been called upon to relocate Appeal Court justices in Delta State and all matters relating to the 2023 governorship election in the State to Abuja, the federal capital territory (FCT).

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports a group known as Delta State Assembly of Youth Leaders (DSAYL) made the call during a press conference held at the Secretariat of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Warri Correspondents’ Chapel.

    The group also called on politicians in the State, who lost at the tribunal to prepare for the next round of elections, rather than inflaming passions.

    Comrade Dudun Oritsegbubemi Patrick, who addressed the press briefing, stressed the NJC should relocate all matters relating to the 2023 elections to forestall unnecessary agitations that may lead to the breakdown of law and order in the State.

    “We have uncovered a new trend in post-election intrigues which bothers political tensions in our nascent democracy. It is public knowledge that the General elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) gave birth to several electoral litigations by the candidates across boards.

    “Post-election litigations in Nigeria have become as constant as the Northern star which verily questions the integrity of our electoral umpires which is not supposed to be so.

    “Nevertheless, today, we are not here to talk about the fairness of our elections but to point out an issue that should be handled swiftly and carefully by the government of Nigeria to avert unnecessary agitations that may lead to the breakdown of law and order,” Comrade Patrick said.

    According to Patrick, the group has observed with keen attention the brewing political tension in the State, following the election tribunal verdicts passed in the State.

    “While some political pundits are jubilating, some are sad and angry in view of the verdicts. Elections and post-election violence is nothing new in Delta State.

    “Delta State produces approximately 40 percent of Nigeria’s oil. According to Nigeria’s 1999 constitution, 13 percent of federal revenue from natural resources is returned to the state from which it came, on a “derivation” basis.

    “Delta State is thus the richest state in the Nigerian federation, and control of its government structures is a major prize both for the individuals and the political parties concerned.

    “Historically, among the main causes of the 2003 fighting in Delta State (as in 1999) have been disputes over the manner in which state and federal elections would be run, and the lack of confidence in the institutions responsible for resolving those disputes and ensuring the vote would be free and fair.

    “What we do not want as a group in the State, is aggrieved persons hijacking the peace and tranquillity currently being enjoyed in Delta State as there seems to be growing tension in the camp of those who lost to their opponents at the various tribunals,” Patrick said.

    He went further to say: “It is on this note that the Delta State Assembly Of Youth Leaders (DSAYL) is calling on the National Judicial Council (NJC) to relocate all election tribunal appeal hearings in Delta State to the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

    “The political tension is not only in Delta State but can be sensed in some States nationwide. We believe as a group that our Justices must be protected at all costs and the sanctity of the judiciary must be upheld at all times.

    “We also know that the best way to do this is through the protection of esteemed wigs of the judiciary.

    “Furthermore, we call on politicians who have lost at the tribunals to prepare for the next round of elections, rather than inflaming passions.

    “We look forward to the kind and swift response of the NJC’s leadership. in order to avert unnecessary agitations that may degenerate to breakdown of law and order in the State”.

  • NJC nominates 23 Federal High Court Judges for appointment [SEE FULL LIST]

    NJC nominates 23 Federal High Court Judges for appointment [SEE FULL LIST]

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) on Friday recommended 23 nominees  for appointment as Judges of the Federal High Court (FHC) of Nigeria.

    Mr Soji Oye, the Director of Information of the Council disclosed this on Friday in Abuja.

    The recommendation for the appointments was made at the 103th  meeting of the Council presided over by the (CJN) Justice Olukayode Ariwoola and held in Abuja.

    Aside from the 23 nominees for the Federal High Court, the NJC also sought the appointment of one Kadi for Kaduna State and four other Kadis for Kano State Sharia Court of Appeal.

    Those recommended as Federal High Court Judges are Ekerete Udofot Akpan, Hussaini Dadan-Garba, Egbe Raphael Joshua, Anyalewa Onoja-Alapa, Aishatu Auta Ibrahim, Ogazi Friday Nkemakonam, Ogundare Kehinde Olayiwola, Onah Chigozie Sergius, Hauwa Buhari, Ibrahim Ahmad Kala and Hauwa Joeph Yilwa.

    Others are Amina Aliyu Mohammed,Sharon Tanko Ishaya,  Chituru Joy Wigwe-Oreh,
    Musa Kakaki, Owoeye Alexander Oluseyi, Abiodun Jordan Adeyemi, Agbaje Olufunmilola Adetutu and Salim Olasupo Ibrahim.

    The rest are Dipeolu Deinde Isaac, Ariwoola Olukayode Jnr, Abdullahi Muhammad Dan-Ige and Mashkur Salisu.

    The NJC noted that Hon Kadi Muhammad Aminu Danjuma is to be appointed as Grand Kadi for Kaduna State.

    Others to be appointed as Kadis for Kano State Sharia courts are Muhammad Adam Kadem, Salisu Muhammad Isa, Isa Idris Sa’id and Aliyu Muhammad Kani.

    The council also recommended candidates are expected to be sworn-in after the approval of the NJC’S recommendations to the President and their respective State Governors and confirmation by their State Houses of Assembly as the case may be.

  • NJC reinstates Ekiti judge, Justice Aladejana after 16 years of suspension

    NJC reinstates Ekiti judge, Justice Aladejana after 16 years of suspension

    After 16 years of suspension by the National Judicial Council, NJC, Justice Babajide Aladejana of Ekiti State High Court has been reinstated to office.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports that Aladejana was suspended from office in 2006 with the state’s former Chief Judge, Justice Kayode Bamisile, under the administration of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Alfa Belgore.

    The duo were suspended for their alleged roles in the political crisis that led to the impeachment of the former Governor of the state, Ayodele Fayose on October 16, 2006, over an alleged N1.4 billion poultry scandal, abuse of office and illegal operation of a foreign account.

    However, Aladejana officially resumed work on Tuesday, as it was gathered that the lift of his suspension followed the review of the NJC.

    He was subsequently allocated High Court number two where he would be hearing cases and performing other judicial functions.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) is an executive body established by the Federal Government of Nigeria in accordance with the provisions of Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution as amended to protect the Judiciary of Nigeria from the whims and caprices of the Executive.

    The Chairman of Council is the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Olukayode Ariwoola, while the deputy chairman is Hon Justice Musa Dattijo Muhammad, justice of the Supreme Court.

    Other members are: The President of the Court of Appeal, four retired Justices of the Supreme Court, a retired President of the Court of Appeal, President of National Industrial Court, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Chief Judge of the High Court FCT, Chief Judges of High Court of four states, President of Customary Court of Appeal, Grand Khadi of Sharia Court of Appeal, President of the Nigerian Bar Association, a former President of the Nigeria Bar Association, three members of the Nigeria Bar Association, and two retired Public Servant.

  • NJC: Has a Daniel come to judgment?

    NJC: Has a Daniel come to judgment?

    BY PROF MIKE OZEKHOME, SAN, CON, OFR, FCIArb, LL.M, Ph.D.

    INTRODUCTION

    The NJC under the current leadership of the Honourable Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, GCON, the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria, appears to be a retooled, re-invigorated, renewed and re-engineered NJC. It obviously seeks for justice – pure and undiluted justice. It shows humility and circumspection in handling matters. It bows to the superior reasoning in judgments delivered by competent courts of law. It accepts man-made errors. It does not attempt to play God; or hold aloft a presumptuously stainless banner of infallibility – an attribute belonging only to God Almighty. It does not arrogate to itself sainthood.

    NJC should only indict Judges in the clearest of cases and should not allow itself to be used, wittingly or unwittingly, by the other arms of Government (particularly the Executive)

    No doubt, it appears the members do read widely. They follow happenings in the land. They gauge the public temperature – especially with the barometer of stake-holders in the justice sector. The NJC just demonstrated these rare qualities in recalling and reinstating the Hon Justices Gladys Olotu and James Agbadu-Fishim. The NJC was mindful of its powers donated to it in sections 6, 153(1)(i), 158, 292(1) and paragraph 21(b) of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution, as altered. It had, earlier, duly exercised these powers in reinstating Hon Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia after winning her cases in several courts of law. It was the triumph of justice over brute force; the triumph of the Rule of law, rather than the rule of might or rule of the thumb. The NJC on 17th January, 2022, has also just done the right thing by recalling and reinstating the Hon Justices Gladys Olotu and James Agbadu-Fishim at the NJC’s 100th meeting.

    NJC: Has a Daniel come to judgment?

    SOME BACKGROUND FACTS
    The above Jurists had fully exonerated by courts of competent jurisdictions after having their day in court; going through the ordeal of court trial; public trial, odium and opprobrium; mental torture and psychological trauma, spanning many years. Let us consider the case of a very brilliant Judge like Olotu, who was appointed a Judge of the Federal High Court on July 28, 2000; resumed duties on September 1, 2000; but compulsorily retired on February 27, 2014, after 14 years of meritorious service to her fatherland. Here is a Judge who had been glowingly recommended for elevation to the Court of Appeal Bench in 2013, by no less a person than the legal prodigy, doyen of Edo lawyers and leader of the Bar in the South-South, Chief K. S. Okeaya-Ineh. Her dreams evaporated; at least, temporarily. But, God always rights wrongs. Dissatisfied with her wrongful and premature termination of her appointment, Olotu took her case to the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN), where she lost. She then appealed to the Court of Appeal in search of justice. In a lead judgment delivered by Hon Justice D. Z. Senchi, sitting on a panel presided over by Hon Justice Peter Ige, Olotu not only had her compulsory retirement by the NJC reversed; the Court of Appeal also ordered that she be paid and accorded all her benefits and privileges as a serving Judge of the Federal High Court. The court held that the “finding of the trial court is perverse, wrong and a miscarriage of justice…The decision of the trial court breached the right of the Appellant to fair hearing and such decision is a nullity”.

    Hon Justice James Terseer Agbadu-Fishim, a Ph.D holder, author, prolific writer and former Senior Lecturer at the University of Abuja and Federal Polytechnic, Ilaro, Ogun State, had been arraigned in court for allegedly receiving N4.8 million from some senior lawyers, including some SANs, which the EFCC claimed amounted to unlawful enrichment. In his defence before the NJC, the cerebral Judge demonstrated graphically how the said sums were given to him by the lawyers, who had either been his friends for decades, or teaching colleagues. He averred that they never at any point in time had any influence over any of his judgments. Indeed, to his solid credit and character, one or two of the lawyers who gave him some money upon his bereavement and who had appeared before him, lost all their cases. Knowing that he was merely doing his job having taken the judicial oath of office, that never stopped them from providing succour to a friend who was in dire need, having lost his father, mother and in-law in quick succession. Hon Justice Raliat Adebiyi had no difficulty striking out the frivolous charges, following the decision in NGAJIWA V. FRN (2017) LPELR-43391(CA); a decision later upheld on 30th of May, 2022, by the full constitutional court of 7 Justices of the apex court.

    The NJC did not bother to appeal Agbadu-Fishim’s victory, even as it did erroneously did in Olotu’s case. I had kicked against such a stance of the NJC appealing judgments which had faulted its disciplinary procedures and actions against Judges, based on insufficient facts. Now, a Daniel has come to judgment in the NJC. They appeared to have heard and worked with my humble opinion generated from a pure heart, in my uncommon defence of a beleaguered and traumatised Judiciary. In my piece dated December 15, 2022, titled, “Re-instatement of Hon Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia: Pristine Justice Finally Served”, which was widely published (see https://saharareporters.com/2022/12/15/re-instatement-hon-justice-ofili-ajumogobia-pristine-justice-finally-served-chief-mike; https://leadership.ng/ozekhome-hails-njc-for-reinstating-ajumogobia/; https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/12/examining-njcs-reinstatement-of-justice-ofili-ajumogobia/; https://guardian.ng/opinion/reinstatement-of-justice-ajumogobia-and-matters-arising/), I wrote as follows:

    “It remains to be said that the Common law or Anglo-Saxon system of jurisprudence which we operate in Nigeria is accusatorial and not the French model, which is inquisitorial. This means that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the State, unlike the latter which is the other way round: a defendant is presumed guilty until he or she proves his or her innocence. Accordingly, to the extent that Hon. Justice Ajumogobia has undergone the rigours of a trial and came out unscathed, it is uncharitable for anyone to insist that she should continue to prove her innocence, as it were.

    The role of the NJC in all this also deserves some commentary. This is because, as a constitutional body, its role should be no more than to dispassionately investigate allegations of misconduct against Judges and, where unproven or disproved, it should promptly reinstate them – in case they have been interdicted. Under no circumstances should NJC go so far as to appeal against a decision of a court which exonerates a judicial officer-as it is currently doing in respect of Hon. Justice Olotu and Agbadu-Fishim. This is wrong, and the NJC should discontinue and withdraw those appeals forthwith.

    The NJC should only indict Judges in the clearest of cases and should not allow itself to be used, wittingly or unwittingly, by the other arms of Government (particularly the Executive), to hound or persecute hapless Judges. That would be grossly unfair; it amounts to a flagrant affront on the Constitution. Those arms of Government should first cleanse their Augean stables – where confirmed cases of corruption-on-steriods abound – before turning to the Judiciary. This is because, compared to them, the Judiciary – as a body – is a Saint”. And the NJC heard me loud and clear.

    I am an Essayist and a prose writer; more, with all humility, in the mould of Chinua Achebe; George Orwell; James Baldwin; Joan Didion; and Elechi Amadi and Chimanda Adichie. I am certainly not a Poet – not a Wole Soyinka; Ola Rotimi; William Shakespeare; John Keats; T.S. Eliot; or John Milton. But, on this particular occasion, let me try my hands on a poem in honour of a reinvigorated and justice-driven NJC. Permit the poem’s obvious inelegance and inadequacy. Please, read on:

    “As vocations go, theirs is possibly the most thankless of all;
    Sitting in judgment, handing down sentences, reprieving some; yet condemning others, men and women;
    But, over-worked, overwhelmed, underpaid, under-rated;
    Peanuts they are paid; they retire into penury. Without roof or future, they despair; Suffering and smiling (aka, Fela Anikulapo Kuti), they pretend all is well. But, all is not well at all;
    Such is the lot of Judges, since the dawn of time; and across the world.

    Harassed by the Legislature; pauperized by the Executive;
    Hounded on false allegations by hooded security agents;
    Condemned by convention to reticence; and sworn to silence;
    They are to be seen and not heard unless when delivering their verdicts.

    They occupy the Judiciary, the weakest of the 3 arms of the State;
    So said Alexander Hamilton in his Federalist Paper No.78;
    Yes, indeed, because, it possesses neither purse nor sword;
    Ever at the mercy of other arms, it is always forlorn.

    Castigated and vilified by losers; but eulogised and celebrated by winners;
    Yes, they do wield the axe of contempt, but it hardly deters;
    So, in a curious paradox, they are most vulnerable, despite possessing enormous powers;
    Being targeted by agents of the State and bearing the ire of sore losers.

    The former includes the EFCC, ICPC, SSS and Policemen (both secret and not-so-secret);
    And the Judges’ regulator – made up of fellow Judges -is the NJC;
    It’s brief – to probe and punish judicial misconduct – is occasionally flawed;
    Leading, ironically, to such injustice which can only be reversed in courts of law.

    Such was the unfortunate fate of Justices Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, Gladys Olotu and Agbadu-Fishim;
    There were others – Justices Sylvester Ngwuta (JSC, now late); Niyi Ademola (rtd), H.A. Ngajiwa, and Musa Kurya;
    Having been unjustly and wrongfully indicted and removed from office by the NJC, they were exonerated;
    Whilst Ajumogobia was recently reprieved, Olotu and Agbadu-Fishim were initially not so lucky. They waited with bated breath and suspended animation for justice to come;
    The Sword of Damocles still dangled over their innocent heads as they still lived in dread of the unknown.

    Justices Ngwuta and Ademola had been similarly roped-in but escaped fortuitously; Ngwuta died shortly after- the aftermath of his ordeal, many believed; Ademola retired voluntarily after his acquittal;
    The case of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen (retd); was particularly egregious, having been dispatched from his exalted seat via a mere ex-parte order;
    He was humiliated out on completely State-instigated trumped-up charges; The shame of a Nation!

    NJC: Has a Daniel come to judgment?

    Prompting the question: “where was the justice in all this?”
    Is it fair for judicial officers who have served their country well to be so humiliated, traumatised and hounded out of office?;
    Is that how to reward them for the yeoman’s job they do?
    The answer is obvious — and it was supplied by courts, too – No!

    So, the apex court weighed in, in the causa celebre, NGANJIWA V FRN;
    As a precedent, the case has changed the narrative, the goal-post of persecution by a vicious Executive;
    Henceforth, no judicial officer can be indicted and removed from office unless the NJC says so after first investigating him;
    Thus, ensuring that other innocent Judges suffer no such poor fate.

    In those dark days, spoke I fiercely and fearlessly in Judges’ defence;
    Very few joined me. Most scampered and supported the powers-that-be; in the name of fighting corruption; Courage took flight from them;
    I pleaded with the NJC to reinstate the vindicated Justices; for they had been pronounced innocent;
    And their exoneration had come through the courts – the last hope of the common man- and woman;
    NJC fully agreed with me and fully reinstated them – to my eternal gratitude;
    NJC, thank you sirs. Relent not in doing good.

    It can safely be said that none of these Jurists suffered in vain;
    They have unwittingly made history; and written their names in gold;
    Their traducers, on the contrary, now hide their heads in shame;
    The would-be preys prevailed; and over them, a light was shown;
    The victims became the victors; the preys, the predators; what an oxymoron! What an irony! Life. God, how awesome thou art.

    The light of justice – ever bright, luminous, constant; and incandescent;
    Unwavering, unflickering, like the Northern Star;
    Thus, proving, yet again, the triumph of good over evil;
    Light over darkness and the virtue of rectitude over infamy.”

  • NJC seeks appointment of 84 judges, others ahead of election matters

    NJC seeks appointment of 84 judges, others ahead of election matters

    As part of efforts to prepare for challenges that may arise for the judiciary in the coming general elections, the National Judicial Council, NJC, has recommended the appointment of nine heads of courts and 84 other judicial officers.

    The recommended persons would after appointments serve at the federal and state high courts in the country.

    A statement issued on Wednesday by the Director of Information in NJC, Soji Oye in Abuja said the candidates were presented for recommendations by its panel of interviews during its 100th meeting presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola.

    Those recommended for posts of Chief Judges included Justice Muhammad Tukur Mu’azu Aliyu (Kaduna), Justice Majebi Josiah Joe (Kogi), Justice Odusola Aiyedun Olusegun (Ondo), Justice Halima Sa’addiya Mohammed (Gombe) and Justice Lilian Abai (Abia).

    Others were Justice Abdulateef Kamaldeen (Grand Kadi, Kwara), Justice Stanley Adekunle Lawal, (President, Customary Court of Appeal, FCT), Justice Monisola Oluwatoyin Abodunde (President, Customary Court of Appeal (Ekiti) and Justice Uhuo Patrick Uchenna (President, Customary Court of Appeal, Ebonyi State.)

    Breakdown of recommended judicial officers 

    A breakdown of the recommended 84 judicial officers showed that four were for Ondo High Court and they are Akinbinu Sylvester Femi, Leonard Boyede Ologun, Bolatito Florence Ajibade and Akinwumi Bankole Jacob.

    The Customary Court of Appeal in Ekiti has three nominees and they are Lawrence Babatope Ojo, Adegboye Rotimi Adesoji and Ogundele Olufolakemi Olufunke.

    Borno State has five for appointment as Judges and they include Amina Mustapha, Ibrahim Mohammed Maina, Hafsatu Isah Bappah, Bukar Malgwi Umar and Mallam Buna Makinta while Anambra has two comprising Etomike Innocent Ndigwe and Tagbo Chinwuba Anieto.

    NJC seeks appointment of 84 judges, others ahead of election matters

    The five nominated for the Sokoto High Court bench are Bashar Ibrahim, Fatima Ahmadu Suka, Abubakar Adamu, Kabiru Muhammad and Amina Modi Yabo while the Sharia Court of Appeal in the state has two nominees as Kadi and are Idris Adamu and Mustapha Abdullahi Ahmad.

    Ogun State High Court has 8 nominees comprising Oluwafunke Omolara Odubanjo,

    Adelaja Adeola Ireti, Basirat Bolanle Adebowale, Adebayo Bamidele Adedapo,

    Ayodele Adebayo Omoniyi, Sunday Olufemi Adeniyi, Awofeso Ireti-Olu Babatunde and Abimola Christopher Shokunbi.

    The two nominees for Bayelsa State High Court are Charlie Ebiyon Duke and Ekadi Amadise Michael while the six for Ebonyi State are Esther Awo Ota, BUkeni Ogoke Stella Ejituruchi, Ruth Obaji Okeh, Blessing Ibeabuchi Chukwu, Christopher Ofoke Mbam and Francis-Abba Solange Amaka.

    The National Industrial Court of Nigeria has six nominees including Buhari Sani, Damachi-Onugba Agede Joyce, Hassan Muhammed Yakubu, Sandra Audu Yelwa, Subilim Emmanuel Danjuma and Muhammad Adamu Hamza.

    Cross Rivers High Court has two nominees in persons of Okokon Edem Nyong and Amajama Jacob Eneji while the four for Adamawa High Court are Christopher Dominic Mapeo, Ahmed Isa, Mohammed Ibrahim Tola and Benjamin Lawan Manji.

    Besides, Adamawa has one Kadi nominee for its Sharia Court of Appeal in the person of Isa Yusuf khalid while its Customary Court of Appeal has another one Judge nominee in person of Adabala Nicholas.

    The breakdown showed that Rivers State High Court has five candidates comprising Asivosuo Maccarthy Oriye, Omonigho Nwibani, Comfort Ifikmotu- Awaji Adangor, Prince Chika Mini and Beauty Ihuoma Emmanuel-Okere while its Customary Court of Appeal has two Judges nominees, Odiki Daniel- Kalio and Tetenwi Ngeli Elerabari.

    Zamfara High Court has four and they are Abdullahi Muhammad Gusau, Umar Adulnasir, Saad Garba Gurbin-Bore and Muntaka Ahmad Ya’akubu.

    Osun State High Court has four nominees comprising Lasisi Muhammmed Adebayo, Awe Micheal Oludare, Fatimah Adejoke Sodamade and Owolawi Joseph Olukunle while has one and is Adamu Mohammed Jajere as well as one Kadi for its Sharia Court of Appeal in person of Kasim Mohammed Kasim.

    Kaduna State High Court bench has seven candidates and they are Yakubu Bodamasi, Abdullahi Isiaka, Buhari Mohammed Balarabe Bashir Shitu Yusuf, Nana Fatima Mohammed John Aku Ambi and Joyce Asabe Akaa’ahs.

    Apart from the recommended seven high court Judges, NJC also sought for appointment of five Kadis for Kaduna Sharia Court of Appeal and they are Aminu Ahmad Jumare, Nuhu Mahmud, Murtala Nasir, Abdulrahman Ibrahim and Mahdi Muhammad Suraj.

    Kaduna Customary Court of Appeal is to have three Judges and they are Dorothy Sim Inwulale, Atung Dorcaas Tabitta and Yusuf Yakubu.

    The breakdown also showed that the Plateau State Customary Court of Appeal has only one Judge nominee in person of Jettei T. Pekun.

    The NJC statement indicated that all recommended candidates would be sworn- in upon approval of their recommendations by their respective state governors and State Houses of Assembly.