Tag: Obla

  • How Agumogobia, Obla created shady company to collect bribe from lawyer – EFCC

    A detective with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, identified as Lawal Abdullahi, on Friday in Lagos revealed how Godwin Obla, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia allegedly perverted the course of justice.

    Mr. Abdullahi alleged before an Ikeja High Court that Mr. Obla gave the Federal High Court judge N5 million gratification to pervert the course of justice in a Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, NIMASA, case.

    He made the allegations while being led in evidence by Rotimi Oyedepo, the EFCC prosecutor.

    The second defendant (Obla) was an external prosecutor to the EFCC, he was assigned to handle a matter between the commission and a former Director General of NIMASA, Raymond Omatseye, who was facing criminal charges for financial crimes.

    The matter was before the first defendant (Ofili-Ajumogobia) at the Federal High Court, our investigation revealed that when the case was pending before the first defendant, there was communication between them.

    The communication was without the knowledge of the opposing party, they are friends and had also been meeting without the knowledge of the opposing party.

    He failed to notify the Commission of this relationship and this may have caused conflict of interest in the case.

    During the course of investigation, it was discovered that there was an exchange of account numbers between the defendants when the NIMASA case was before the first defendant.

    The sum of N5 million was transferred by the second defendant to the judge’s account called Nigel and Colive in Diamond Bank,” he said.

    Mr. Abdullahi noted in his testimony that it was necessary for Mr. Obla to have informed the EFCC of his relationship with the judge because there would have been a conflict of interest in the case.

    Obla met Ofili-Ajumogobia in her chambers and the account number of Nigel and Colive was given to him in which N5 million was paid from the account of Obla and Co, the lawyer’s office account in UBA.

    He admitted in his statement that he met the first defendant sometime in April or May 2015 and as at that time, the NIMASA matter was not concluded in court.

    In May 2016, judgment was passed by the first defendant, the suspect was convicted but that judgment was set aside by the Court of Appeal on May 11, 2017.

    The judge’s daughter, Aribim Ajumogobia, was also during this period employed by NIMASA.”

    The investigator revealed that when the anti-graft agency confronted the.defendants with evidence of the bank transactions, they gave different accounts of why the money was given to the judge.

    Ofili-Ajumogobia gave me three different responses as to why the money was paid into her account.

    First she denied knowing Obla, second, she said it was for a property transaction for a property at Hilltop area of Abeokuta and that Obla paid N5 million out of N28.5 million which was the cost of the property.

    In another breath, she said it was for a property in Kashi village Abuja worth N40 million for which Obla showed an interest in and paid a deposit of N5 million.

    When we confronted Obla, he said the N5 million was paid to the judge to buy iron rods for building and that one Joseph or George supplied the iron rods to him.

    We confronted him with Ofili-Ajumogobia’s statement and he said her statement was not true, and that he did not buy any property from the judge,” he said.

    Mr. Abdullahi said the EFCC investigated the claims of Obla that the N5 million was for the supply of iron rods and the anti-graft agency’s findings were that the claims were untrue.

    The EFCC investigator went further to claim that Ofili-Ajumogobia had used her two children; Aridim and Tochukwu, to front as directors in companies owned by her and used to launder money.

    The address of Nigel and Colive was given as 293, Borno Way, Ebute Meta, Lagos.

    We wrote to the company and there was no response and our visit to the company address proved that it was non-existent.

    The directors of the company; Aridim Ajumogobia and Tochukwu Ajumogobia are the two children of the first defendant.

    They were invited by the Commission and they claimed that they did not know anything about the N5 million transaction, the company was not into any kind of business and they did not know how they became directors,” he told the court.

    The witness said the anti-graft agency through its investigators said the N5 million paid into judge’s account by Mr. Obla was used to decorate her home in Ikoyi, Lagos.

    When the N5 million was paid into the account of Nigel and Colive, the balance of the account was N11.5 million.

    We traced N4million paid from that account into the account of New Frontiers Engineering Construction Company, an interior decorating company for a N30 million contract to decorate her home.

    The first defendant was the one who instructed the disbursement of all the payments for Nigel and Colive.”

    The EFCC investigator also told the court how the N18 million the judge allegedly borrowed from a former employer, Gregory Ero of Arkleen Oil and Gas Ltd was used.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Mr. Ero, Ms. Ofili-Ajumogobia’s former employer had testified in court on May 26 that the judge refused to pay back the N18 million he gave her in 2012.

    Mr. Abdullahi while testifying said: “My findings were that N18 million from Arkleen Oil and Gas was not part of the illegitimate earnings of the judge.

    When the money was received on June 5,2012 it was placed in a fix deposit, as at March , 2013 the N18 million had become N21 million and at April 29, 2013 N22 million was transferred to the first defendant’s account in Diamond Bank.

    This sum formed part of the N18 million that was collected from Arkleen Oil and Gas, it was converted into dollars on May 6, 2013 at N157 per dollar and moved into her domiciliary account in Diamond Bank.

    The converted sum was $140, 129, 39 and three days after it was received, $139, 815 was moved to the offshore account of Silversteps Incorporation, an account domiciled in First Bank of Nigeria (FBN), United Kingdom.

    Investigations revealed that the first defendant was behind of Silversteps Incorporation and the sole director of the company was her daughter Aribim Ajumogobia but all transactions were done by the judge.

    Aribim Ajumogobia was interviewed and she confirmed that all transactions were done by her mother.

    The money was used for a mortgage transaction for a property located at 157, Verulem Lane, London.

    Mr. Oyedepo sought to tender documents of the mortgage transaction as evidence but Robert Clarke, Ms. Ofili-Ajumogobia’s defence counsel, objected that the documents had no connection with the charges the judge was facing.

    After his objection, Mr. Clarke in an application dated October 23 requested the release of the judge’s international passport by the court.

    Mr. Oyedepo, however, opposing Mr. Clarke’s application said: “I do not think there is an approval from the Honourable Chief Judge for the first defendant’s journey to the U.S.A.”

    Mr. Clarke responding to Mr. Oyedepo said: “We would look into this aspect of the application and get the position of Your Lordship at the next adjourned date.

    Ifedayo Adedipe also asked the court for the release of Mr. Obla’s international passport.

    My Lord, we have an application dated October 17 seeking Your Lordship’s leave for an order for the temporary release of the second defendant’s international passport.

    He wants to travel to Atlanta, Georgia, USA on October 28 and return on or before November 10, the defendant is desirous of travelling because of family obligations,” Mr. Adedipe said.

    In his ruling, Justice Hakeem Oshodi said: “The Chief Registrar shall release the international passport of the second defendant who is to travel between October 28 and return on or before November 9.”

    Ms. Ofili-Ajumogobia is standing trial alongside Godwin Obla, a former prosecutor of the EFCC.

    Both have been jointly charged with a two-count offence bordering on perverting the course of justice.

    Mr. Obla is facing an additional two counts of offering gratification in the sum of N5 million to Ms. Ofili-Ajumogobia, a public official while serving as a judge.

    Ms. Ofili-Ajumogobia faces a 26-count charge bordering on unlawful enrichment, taking property by a public officer, corruption, forgery and giving false information to an official of the EFCC.

    Both denied all the charges.

    Justice Oshodi adjourned the case until November 10 for ruling on the admissibility of the mortgage documents and continuation of trial.

    (NAN)

  • Sagay, Malami disagree over FG’s appeal of Saraki’s acquittal

    Discordant views from the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami and Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, on review of the federal government’s strategy in combatting corruption following the unexpected triumph of Senate President Bukola Saraki at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), highlight cracks in President
    Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade.

    Saraki had in the last 21 months been facing trial over false declaration of assets, but the tribunal last Wednesday ruled that he had no case to answer in the 18-point charge brought against him by the federal government.

    Following Saraki’s acquittal, there had been rumble among top echelons of government since the judgement was delivered with some calling for appeal while others are of the view that status quo ante should be maintained.

    However, The Federal Government yesterday appealed the court ruling that acquitted the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, of charges of corruption and false declaration of assets.

    The federal government through Rotimi Jacobs SAN and Pius Akutah, an assistant Chief State Counsel signed, filed eleven grounds of appeal at the Court of Appeal Abuja to challenge the judgment of the CCT.

    However, from a very reliable source, TheNewsGuru.com gathered that a strategic meeting earlier conveyed by some of the frontline Buhari’s anti-corruption aides in order to review the federal government’s strategy in combatting corruption reportedly ended up on a dead end road.

    The meeting was attended by Malami, Sagay and another legal aide in the presidency, Mr. Okoi Obno-Obla.

    Recall that Prof. Itse Sagay had condemned the acquittal saying there was no basis for the position taken by the tribunal, even as he stressed that the prosecution presented enough evidence to secure a conviction..

    In the same vein, the Special Assistant to the President on Prosecutions, Mr. Okoi Obono-Obla, also maintained Sagay’s position that government would appeal the judgement.

    Meanwhile, whereas while the duo are drummed for the appeal of the tribunal’s verdict, Malami, has a contradictory view.

    Malami, it was gathered had disclosed that he would need the advise of President Muhammadu Buhari before a decision on whether to appeal the case or not.

    He also said that FG has not appealed such case in the past and preceedent is law, since there is no such precedence in such high profile case it will be difficult to start it with Saraki’s case.

    At the meeting Malami was quoted as saying, “it is a fruitless journey; we are not willing to embark on that. If we can’t review judgement against Tinubu, then we cannot review case against Saraki as that will appear as double standard”

    When contacted, an aide to the Senate President told TheNewsGuru.com that: “They can go ahead with the appeal but it is just an abuse of court process and we will come out victorious any day.”

    Meanwhile, a chieftain of the All Progressive Congress (APC), in Abuja mentioned that a review of the judgement against Saraki will negatively affect the integrity of the APC.

    “If they can’t appeal the case against Tinubu, then why waste time appealing against Saraki. It is important that our party start thinking about its integrity or we will risk getting booted out in 2019.” The source added

  • Court grants Ajumogobia, Obla’s requests to travel abroad for medical treatment

    Court grants Ajumogobia, Obla’s requests to travel abroad for medical treatment

    An Ikeja High Court has granted an embattled Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia and Godwin Obla, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), both facing trial over alleged corruption, permission to travel abroad.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that on May 26, Ofili-Ajumogobia and Obla’s defence counsel, in separate applications, had requested for the release of the duo’s international passports, to enable them seek medical treatment overseas.

    Ofili-Ajumogobia, in a 17-paragraph affidavit in support of her application, claimed to be suffering from high blood pressure, hypertension, palpitations, and stress-related issues.

    Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), had opposed the applications, stating that it was a ploy to stall the trial, noting that their alleged illnesses could be treated in Nigeria.

    Justice Hakeem Oshodi, in a ruling on Thursday, ordered the release of their international passports which has been in the custody of the court, as part of their bail conditions.

    Oshodi also noted that the EFCC did not provide proof that the alleged illnesses of the defendants could be treated in Nigeria.

    “The prosecution failed to give evidence why the applicant’s sicknesses cannot be treated in Nigeria.

    “Also how the prosecutor came to the decision that the defendants would jump bail is best known to him.

    “I believe that the first defendant, as a Federal High Court Judge, has a lot to lose if she considers the idea of jumping bail.

    “The Chief Registrar is hereby ordered to release the international passport of the first defendant to enable her travel abroad between June 7 and June 13, 2017.

    “The first defendant must return the passport to the Chief Registrar on or before July 1, 2017,’’ Oshodi said.

    Granting Obla permission to travel to Houston, Texas, in the U.S. for medical treatment, Oshodi noted that the SAN’s passport must be returned to the court on July 4.

    “The second defendant is also granted leave to travel for medical treatment and must also return his passport to the Chief Registrar on July 4,’’ he said.

    After the ruling, Mr Charles Musa, a legal practitioner, testified as the tenth prosecution witness for the anti-graft agency.

    The EFFC, alleged that Musa, a classmate and friend of the judge, drafted the deed of agreement of Nigel and Colive Ltd, a company linked by the anti-graft agency to Ofili-Ajumogobia with another company, County and City Bricks Ltd.

    According to the EFCC, the account of Nigel and Colive Ltd, was allegedly used to launder funds illegally by Ofili-Ajumogobia during her tenure as a judge.

    Musa, who was being led in evidence by Oyedepo, denied signing or drafting the deed of agreement between the two companies.

    “I sent her an email about the terms of agreement between the companies and she did not get back to me again,” Musa said.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that Ofili-Ajumogobia and Obla, a former prosecutor of the EFCC, are jointly charged on two-counts of perverting the course of justice.

    Obla is facing an additional two counts of offering gratification in the sum of N5 million to Ofili-Ajumogobia, a public official, while serving as a judge.

    Ofili-Ajumogobia faces a 26-count charge bordering on unlawful enrichment, taking property by a public officer, corruption by a public officer, forgery and giving false information to an official of the EFCC.

    Both denied all the charges.

    The case was adjourned until July 6 for continuation of trial.

     

     

    NAN