Tag: Onnoghen

  • Court rejects suit compelling FG to pay ex-CJN Onnoghen N130m

    Court rejects suit compelling FG to pay ex-CJN Onnoghen N130m

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit seeking N130million as damages from the Federal Government and Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) for violation of the rights of ex-Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen.

    Justice Taiwo Taiwo held, among others that the applicant, Dr. N.S. Nwawka, filed the suit without Justice Onnoghen’s permission, thus he had no locus standi.

    In his October 12, 2020 ruling, the judge held: “I have looked at the originating processes filed by the applicant herein, with due respect to him, I do not see any nexus between him and the respondents jointly or severally.

    “I do not see his remote or immediate interest in the matter in which he has not been instructed to file by the former Chief Justice of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “I pose a question to him and this is whether the Former CJN has told him that he is incapable of fighting his own battle or that he is even ready for any battle against anybody?”

    The judge also declined to grant Nwawka leave to apply for a referral of some “constitutional questions to the Court of Appeal” for determination.

    He held: “The applicant’s motion is incompetent as it is and I, therefore, dismiss same.

    “My conclusion is that the NPO is meritorious and I, therefore, dismiss the action filed by the applicant. The action to say the least is a waste of the time of the court.

    “If the applicant has time to file this type of unmeritorious action, the time of the court is valuable and should not be wasted. Case dismissed.”

    Nwawka, who appeared in person, brought the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/16/2020 on January 7, 2020

    At the hearing of the substantive case on July 15, he averred that sometime in 2019, Immigration officers stationed at the international airport prevented the former CJN from travelling to Ghana and confiscated his international passport without any prior order of a court of competent jurisdiction.

    He also alleged that the Federal Government has refused to pay Onnoghen his terminal benefit and that there is no pending prosecution of the former CJN to warrant such treatment.

    Nwawka said he approached the court as a concerned citizen to enforce Onnoghen’s fundamental rights to travel in and out of Nigeria unhindered and rights to freedom from inhuman, humiliating, and degrading treatment.

    Besides the N130m as general and exemplary damages, he also sought an order court directing the respondents to immediately release Onnoghen’s international passport Number A50445233 confiscated since November 11, 2019, as well as a perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from any further foreign travel ban against the Former CJN.

    But the government’s lawyer, Mrs. Habiba U. Chime opposed him, on the ground among others that Nwawka did not disclose how his legal rights were affected by the acts complained of.

    She argued the applicant did not disclose any legal or equitable interest of his that was attacked and that the suit was wrongly commenced at the Federal High Court.

    The 2nd respondent was not represented nor filed any process.

  • (TNG Analysis): Nigerian judiciary showcased an all time low in 2019 – Lawyers

    (TNG Analysis): Nigerian judiciary showcased an all time low in 2019 – Lawyers

    …Onnoghen’s removal was a bad signal
    …it was a sad and gloomy judicial calendar for Nigerians
    ….Judiciary and the ‘Hurdle Race’ of Safeguarding Rule of Law in 2020 after a challenging 2019
    Emmanuel Bagudu, Abuja
    No doubt the year 2019 was very challenging for the Nigerian Judiciary. The third Arm of Government during the year had to battle to resist impositions from the Executive who on different occasions depleted the Rule of Law at the expense of effective Justice delivery.
    From the removal from office of the former CJN Walter Onnoghen without due process to obvious habitual defiance to court orders by the executive leading to abuse of human rights; the executive indeed gave the judiciary a very high hurdle to cross to ensure that Justice delivery in the country is not compromised in the year 2019. One among many instances was the unlawful detention of the leader of the “revolution now” Omoleye SOWORE whose ordeal caused a national outcry from the civil society Communities whose cries reached the Nigerian international Community. It will be recalled that Sowere’s continued unlawful detention provoked trial as Judge Ijeoma Ojukwu joined the records of the few Judges that stood for rule of law by threatening the Executive.
    “Take notice that unless you obey the direction contained in the order of the Federal High Court of Justice, Abuja made on the 6 November 2019, which ordered you to release the Defendants/Applicants in Suit No; FHC/ABJ/CR/235/2019 forthwith, you will be guilty of contempt of court and will be liable to be committed to prison….” Trial Judge Ijeoma Ojukwu threatens Director-General of the State Security Service Yusuf Bichi. That happened in November. It was then adjudged to be one of the most courageous move by a sitting judge to safeguard the Rule of Law.
    This resistance of incursion into the Justice system by the Executive which Justice Ojukwu did if emulated on different occasions by other Judges will increase the credibility of the Judiciary in the year 2020.
    This is not to say that the Judiciary knows it all. Lessons must be learned from some abnormalities that happened in 2019.
    The controversial exit of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria CJN Walter Onnoghen made the list of abnormalities in the Judiciary. The National Judicial Council (NJC) was not given the room to try Onnoghen on Allegations of Corruption before he was given the boots by President Mohammadu Buhari and neither did the NJC resisted such abnormality.
    One Dennis Aghanya petitioned the embattled former CJN for not properly declaring his assets as required by the law. Onnoghen’s suspension followed an order by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) where he was arraigned in January 2019.
    The former CJN eventually resigned from office later in April 2019 after he was convicted by CCT, albeit, he was billed to vacate office in December 2022 when he would clock 70. Though this caused a lot of public outcry, the Judiciary continued its proceedings with high profile Post-election litigations in hundreds still counting in various courts. The Judiciary tried to resist the temptation of carrying over post-election cases to 2020.
    The biggest of them all which caused alot of tension in the country was resolved in October when the Chief Justice of Nigeria laid to rest all anxieties in the Presidential Election Petition filed by the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking the nullifaction of the Election of Muhammadu Buhari as President of Nigeria. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of President Buhari. Other appeals from governorship elections were also resolved by the Apex court with likes of Nasir Elrufai of Kaduna state and Abdullahi Ganduje of Kano State and a host of others being declared legally elected.
    Moving forward, the year 2020 will be very interesting. The industrial Court of Nigeria won’t be free as usual, Labour related cases are expected to throng the industrial Court especially now that issues of Minimum wage is on the front burner.
    The executive will not calm down in its quest for credibility and so will engage anyone that crosses its way in a legal feud. The year 2020 will be just three years to the General elections and it’s expected that gaining prominence and winning the heart of the people will be the gimmicks of politicians especially those in Government. This will make the courts busy. A lot of hurdles are being projected in 2020. Judges must resist intimidation, bribery, and blackmail from politicians for the interest of the sanctity of the Rule of Law.
    Ongoing and incoming high profile cases should not threaten Judges. Already a Judge of the Federal High Court Abuja Ahmed Mohammed had withdrawn from being adjudicator in the case of alleged treason between the Federal Goverment and leader of the Revolution Now movement Omoyele Sowore. This according to the judge was because of allegations of bais coming from the defendants. This can be prevented if counsel play according to the rules of the game. Lawyers in both private and public practice have a role to play in helping the Judiciary succeed in 2020.
    They must be proactive serving their judicial processes, justice delayed is justice denied. There should be a massive improvement in the pace of Justice delivery in 2020. Corruption must be resisted as well. These and many more professional practice in the bar and bench will give the Judiciary in 2020 a face lift.
    In conclusion here are the views of some lawyers.
    “The Nigerian Judiciary in 2019 reached an all time low, it was a dim and dark phase that history will remember and several severe questions shall be asked of the political actors, especially those who lurked around the corridors of powers, who quickly betrayed their professional and calling for political and maybe pecuniary considerations. Despite this dim and bleak introductions, there were several reasons to smile and be proud of, the Nigerian spirit of resilience forbids and prevents us to wallow needlessly in the dark, there have been several positive steps and bold decisions reached in 2019, I shall spend the next few paragraphs highlighting the highs and lows of the Nigerian Judiciary on 2019.
    With the enactment of the Federal High Court Rules 2019, the Judiciary had taken steps to bring the federal high courts up to date in terms of filling penalties, which will in turn produce speedy and expeditious attendance to civil matter this is indeed a step worthy of commendation. Another incident worthy of mention is the supreme courts ruling in Abdullahi V Adetutu in 2019, that has effectively overruled her self in the earlier case of Benjamin V Kailo. As it stands, the issues as it relates to registration of title has been judicially caged having returned back to the earlier position. I must also commend several swift decisions across this nation as far as election petition were concerned. And even in criminal matters.
    However, I will say overall it was a sad, dark and gloomy year in our Judicial calendar, one that posterity will call all of us to answer. Let’s be clear, as a nation one of our greatest strength yet greatest bane, is our short memory, and swiftness to jump on to the next big story, nothing last in our mind for that long, as Josphine Anenih, once stated, Nigerians suffer from Political Amnesia.
    The Suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria by the president is a scar that would last longer and would certainly outlive the this current dispensation, regardless of where one stands in the debate, or political affiliation, a wrong so deep and unfathomable could never have gone by without the active connivance of those close to the president with legal background. Our country is rooted in separation of powers, whereas, the president heads the executive, he has no powers or limits to dabble into the realm of the judiciary, how can you undo what you cannot do? The president may only Appoint the CJN , if such is person is recommended by the National Judical council, and that appointment cannot stand until and unless the senate confirms that person, therefore the CJN does not serve at the pleasure of the president, how then can a president suspend the CJN. Yet we the people allowed this executive waywardness to sail through. Indeed the president has all the powers to investigate and even arrest the CJN, and a magistrate can even convict such a person of his crimes are proven, but for the president to suspend or dismiss, he use the judiciary to harass a sitting CJN, the message he clearly wanted to pass has been passed.
    How can the Judiciary be independent when a judge can be unceremoniously removed? Even if the president had the best intention, his action has placed a stain in the judiciary that would take concerted effort to repair.
    Assuming without conceding that dismissed (not resigned) CJN was of a questionable character, the message that even lower judges of unimpeachable character would ask themselves whenever they have a reason to disagree with the executive is whether they would not be subjected to public ridicule like the last CJN was. Like stated earlier, regardless of the president’s best intentions and motive, an ugly precedent had been set, a Pharaoh who knows not Joseph, could use this precedent for his own mischief and evil; and that’s the problem with ‘gree die politics’. Lastly, I fear that the bench and even the bar, have fallen into a new low of ethno-religious divide, lawyers first reason as Muslims/Christians southerners/Northerners before people of noble calling, this is extremely disturbing. The judiciary is a glue in this nation, we must pay extra attention to the welfare and well being of legal practitioners in the bench and bar.
    Lastly, I am an unrepentant optimist, I see greater days ahead of us, I see a more united an committed bench and bar in 2020, I see a greater, happier more united Nigeria.
    By Osigwe Ahmed Momoh; A Legal Practitioner writes from Abuja.
    “The performance of the Judiciary in 2019 is quite commendable, however it will go without controversy and recommendations in the roles it plays on burning issues in our Nationals socio-political events that occurred in the year in review.
    While steps are been taken for the fight for the independence of the Judiciary, there is need to carry out an inhouse cleaning of the Men behind the Masquerades in the hallowed temple of Justice.
    A quick reminder of events, to the average Nigerian is that the law of the land is measured in two ways which are implemented or followed based on the class of individuals involved.
    A recall of the events in 2019, the removal of the Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen as the Chief Justice of Nigeria with the issuance of restraining orders by 3 Courts of Coordinate jurisdictions and subsequent renewal of such orders.
    The role played by the Code of Conduct Tribunals in the said saga are issues that calls for Academic review and possible legislation to forstall the recurrence.
    The style and measurement used granting interim orders as earlier stated varies in my view which depend on the parties involved.
    In 2019, the lower bench, that is the Magistrate, Customary and Sharia Courts some are majorly an appendage of the Executives particularly the Nigerian Police Force, while attention are channeled to the Courts of records, the lower Bench need human Capital development.
    The judicial crisis that caught attention of Nigerians and the comity of Nations is the Sowore’s issue that A Court Order DSS for the detention of a citizen, the said Order was obeyed by DSS with Alacrity, thereafter, the same Court Ordered the same DSS for the release of the same Citizen, the same DSS outrightly disregarded the same Court Order to release the same Citizen without even an Appeal filed.
    Furthermore, the same DSS approached the same Court to arraign the same Citizen before the same Court and the same Court entertained the same DSS and remanded the same Citizen in custody of the same DSS.
    So therefore Comrades, going by the above circumstances, it is clear that what we should be fighting for is not the INDEPENDENCE of JUDICIARY as popularly being canvassed but what we should be fighting for is that the faces behind the Masquerades in the Hollow Temple of Justice to carefully understand the Jurisprudence of The Rule of Law, The Law of Rule and The Doctrine of Seperation of Power.
    We hope and expect that come 2020, the Judiciary will live upto expectation, not only seeking for the independence of the Judiciary but also seen practicing it through their judgments and actions towards the non compliance of the Judgment, because they are the custodians of our Nation’s Peace.
    Tohwo Oseruvwoja Esq.”
    ” This 2019, the judiciary was once more disregarded and desecrated by the government and its agencies. This shows the complete disregard for the rule of law and as a result a diminishing hope for the common man. I hope that in 2020, the judiciary will purge itself of elements (corruption, nepotism, fraternizing with political leaders etc) that make room for incessant disregard.
    Augusta Yaakugh Esq”
  • NJC applauds Buhari for accepting Onnoghen’s retirement

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has hailed President Muhammadu Buhari for accepting the voluntary retirement of former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen.

    It gave the commendation at its emergency meeting yesterday, during which members deliberated on the President’s decision in relation to Justice Onnoghen’s exit from the Bench.

    President Buhari’s Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, had, in a statement on Sunday, said: “President Buhari has accepted the voluntary retirement from service of Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria, effective from May 28, 2019.

    “The President thanked Justice Onnoghen for his service to the Federal Republic of Nigeria and wished him the best of retirement life.”

    NJC’s spokesman, Soji Oye, said in a statement that members of the judicial body noted that Buhari’s acceptance of Onnoghen’s retirement was in line with its recommendation to the President on April 3.

    The statement reads: “The NJC held an Emergency Meeting today (yesterday) to take formal note of the acceptance of the voluntary retirement of Hon. Mr. Justice W. S. N. Onnoghen, GCON, as Chief Justice of Nigeria by President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR.

    “The President’s acceptance of the retirement is in line with Council’s recommendation to the President on 3rd April, 2019.

    “Council at the end of its deliberations thanked the President for the acceptance which was in the best interest of Nigeria.”

    He claim that Buhari’s acceptance of Onnoghen’s retirement was part of its recommendations creates doubt as to the actual position of the NJC on the issue.

    The NJC had, after concluding its investigation of allegations of “financial impropriety and infidelity to the constitution” raised against Onnoghen in a petition by the economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), kept sealed lips on its findings, but announced that it has sent its recommendations to the President.

    In their recent response to a suit by the Incorporated Trustees of Malcolm Omirhobo Foundation, challenging Buhari’s appointment of Justice Ibrahim Muhammad as acting CJN, the President and the office of the Attorney General of the Federation (OAGF) disclosed that the NJC recommended Onnghen’s compulsory retirement.

    They stated that NJC’s recommendation that Onnoghen be compulsorily retired preceded his retirement letter to the President on April 4, 2019.

     

  • Buhari accepts Onnoghen’s voluntary retirement

    Buhari accepts Onnoghen’s voluntary retirement

    …appoints five new Justices of Supreme Court

    President Muhammadu Buhari has accepted the voluntary retirement from service of Justice Walter Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria, effective from May 28, 2019.

    A statement by the President’s Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, confirmed this in Abuja on Sunday.

    The statement reported the President as thanking Onnoghen for his service to the country and wished him the best of retirement life.

    Onneghen was born on the Dec. 22, 1950 at Okurike Town, Biase Local Government Area of Cross Rivers.

    He began his primary school education at the Presbyterian Primary School, Okurike Town between 1959 and 1965.

    Before his appointment as the Chief Justice of the Federation, he worked with the Ministry of Justice, Ikeja, Lagos; Ogun, between 1978 and 1979 as the Pupil State Counsel.

    Between 1989 – 1998, he was a High Court Judge of Cross River Judiciary.

    During his time as the High Court Judge of Cross River, he was made the Chairman of Cross River State Armed Robbery and Firm Arms Tribunal and he held the post for 3 years from 1990 – 1993.

    Sometime in 1996 while still holding the post of High Court Judge of Cross River, he was appointed the Chairman, Judicial Enquiry into the Crisis between Students of the University of Calabar and Obufa Esuk Orok Community, Calabar.

    In 1998, he was the Chairman, Failed Banks Tribunal, Ibadan Zone.

    Between 1992 and 2004, he served as the Judge, High Court of Rivers, while from 1998 to 2005, he served as Justice of the Court of Appeal.

    In 2007, Justice Onnoghen played a huge role in 2007 election which saw the Late Umaru Yar’adua as President of Nigeria.

    He had a dissenting judgment that annulled the presidential election. His position was however a minority judgment.

    After being nominated as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria by the Acting President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, he was confirmed by the Senate on March 1, 2017, and sworn in on March 7

    Onnoghen’s trials for false assets declaration started when a petition was filed by the civil rights group at the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), alleging that he owned sundry accounts.

    It alleged the accounts were primarily funded through cash deposits made by himself up to as recently as Aug. 10, 2016, which appeared to have been run in a manner inconsistent with financial transparency and the code of conduct for public officials.

    The trial began on Jan. 14 at Code of Conduct Tribunal but Onnoghen was absent.

    On Feb. 11, the council set up a preliminary complaints assessment committee to review the responses given to it by Onnoghen, and Muhammad who is acting in his stead.

    Onnoghen is accused of failing to fully declare his assets, while Muhammad is facing allegations of misconduct.

    The NJC said it reconvened and resolved to constitute into the Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee in accordance with Regulation 17 of the National Judicial Council Judicial Discipline Regulations, 2017.

    Meanwhile, President Buhari has written the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Muhammad, on the appointment of additional five Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

    Shehu said the President wrote: ‘‘Pursuant to the provisions of Section 230(2) A&B of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), I am pleased to request that you initiate in earnest the process of appointing additional five Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria to make the full complement of 21 Justices as provided by the aforementioned provisions of the Constitution.

    ‘‘This is in line with the Government’s Agenda of repositioning the Judiciary in general and Supreme Court in particular for greater efficiency, with a view to reducing the backlogs of appeals pending at the Supreme Court.

    ‘‘Please accept, your Lordship, the assurances of my highest regards.’’

  • Onnoghen appeals conviction by CCT, calls it a miscarriage of justice

    Suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, has asked the Court of Appeal, Abuja to quash the judgment of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) that convicted him of charges of false assets declaration.

    Onnoghen in his appeal filed Thursday against the judgment of the tribunal is also praying the appellate court to set aside the order of forfeiture of his assets to the federal government made by the CCT.

    The CCT on Thursday convicted Justice Walter Onnoghen on all six count charge of false assets declaration preffered against him by the federal government.

    The three man panel of the tribunal in a judgment delivered by the chairman, Danladi Umar, held that from the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses and the statement of Onnoghen admitting that he made a mistake of not declaring his five accounts with the Standard Chartered Bank, the tribunal came to the conclusion that Onnoghen was guilty as charged.

    The CCT having convicted Onnoghen of the charges went ahead to remove Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    Umar also ordered that in line with the provisions of the Code of Conduct and Tribunal Act, Onnoghen was barred from holding any public office for the next ten years.

    Umar also held that since Onnoghen could not adduce any evidence as to how he got the money in the undeclared accounts in the Standard Chartered Bank, the money are thereby confiscated, seized and are to be forfeited to the federal government.

    Onnoghen however in the appeal filed on his behalf by his lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo SAN, is challenging the decision of the tribunal on grounds that the tribunal erred in law when it convicted him of all the six count charge.

    According to Awomolo, the CCT erred in law when it dismissed Onnoghen’s application challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal to hear the matter and thus occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice.

    Awomolo argued that as at the time the charge was filed against him on January 11, 2019, he was not subject to the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

    He further argued that the tribunal erred in law when it assumed jurisdiction having on January 9, 2018 in the case of Justice Sylvester Ngwuta affirmed the position of the Court of Appeal in the case of Ngajiwa and dismissed and acquitted Ngwuta of the charge.

    Awomolo said the tribunal erred in law and acted out of jurisdiction when it ordered that the assets of the appellant be confiscated and therefore occasioned grave miscarriage of justice.

    Part of the 16 grounds the appeal was predicted upon include the claim that the tribunal erred when it held that Onnoghen confessed to the charge framed by admission and use that as a basis to hold that Onnoghen did not declare his assets from 2005 when he was appointed Justice of the Supreme Court.

    He wondered that the evidence of the defence witness did not create any reasonable doubt on the evidence of the prosecution witness that Onnoghen did not make declaration of his assets since 2005.

    The appellant further wondered how the tribunal could convict him on charge of false assets declaration when the five accounts in Standard Chartered Bank were declared in 2016.

    Part of the reliefs sought in the appeal however includes an order setting aside the judgment of the tribunal on grounds that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the charge.

    An order holding that the tribunal ought to have recused itself from the matter based on the allegations of bias.

    And an order discharging and acquitting Onnoghen from the charge.

  • Senior Advocates misled, dumped Onnoghen – Sagay

    The Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Anti-Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), has said that the conviction of the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), yesterday, has shown that nobody is above the law in the country.

    Reacting on the conviction of the nation’s one Chief Judge, Sagay said Onnoghen allowed himself to be misled by a team of Senior Advocates who later dumped him when the heat was much.

    He said: “Nobody is above the law. These Senior Advocates and some of these judges wanted to create a privileged class who has powers to judge others and send them to prison, but they commit crimes and find immunity for it. I find that absolutely unacceptable.”

    We can see from what has happened the quality of some of these Senior lawyers. “Once adversity started, once it was clear that the Chief Justice was going to lose the case, did you see them with him again? They stopped going to the court with him, they are all opportunists. They are people who want to be seen in the public so that they can be recognized and remembered when money is being shared and so on.

    “It’s a shame, but I think the principle has been established and that is nobody is above the law. I also think we can admit that there is serious problem with our judiciary and there is need for cleaning. If that level is not clean, then the rest of the country will remain unclean.” While ruling out any act of victimization or politics as it concerns the 2019 election in the plight of Onnoghen, Sagay said: “What has happened is that somebody in a high position has not met the standard of that position. When these charges were first brought against the CJN, what happened was scandalous.

    “His friends and acolytes started jumping from one court to another, seeking unnecessary injunctions; they even went to the National Industrial Court. They even went to the Appeal Court when there is nothing to appeal. So, they didn’t handle the matter with dignity and respect that his office demands. “At the time he should have resigned honourably, he decided to fight dirty with all these Senior Advocates pushing him on and misleading him. But now they have all deserted him,”he said.

  • Onnoghen’s sack: ‘The law is no respecter of persons, titles…’ – Presidency

    Onnoghen’s sack: ‘The law is no respecter of persons, titles…’ – Presidency

    The Presidency has reacted to the conviction of former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, by the Code of Conduct Tribunal, saying the ruling was a major victory for the anti-corruption policy of the Buhari administration.

    Mr Onnoghen was convicted on Thursday afternoon for false declaration of assets.

    The tribunal ordered that he forfeit the money in the five accounts he failed to declare in his assets declaration form.

    The tribunal ordered his removal from office and declared that he should not be allowed to hold public office in the next 10 years.

    Reacting to the verdict on Thursday, the Presidency in a statement by spokesperson Garba Shehu said the outcome of the trial “demonstrates clearly that the law is no respecter of persons, titles, social or political connections”.

    The statement added that the essence of the rule of law is to hold everyone accountable equally before the law, regardless of their high or law status in the society.

    According to the Presidency, the war against corruption is “all encompassing and is not designed to persecute anyone for political or other reasons”.

    “The rule of law would lose its meaning and validity if only the weak, the poor and powerless are punished for their violations of the law. Countries succeed because the rule of law is evenly upheld and enforced. The war against corruption would go nowhere if the high and mighty are spared because of their influence and connections. You can’t fight corruption by allowing impunity because the rule of law cannot function where impunity is tolerated,” Mr Shehu wrote.

    The statement said that the conviction of Justice Onnoghen should send a clear message that the dragnet against corruption will be spread widely to hold public officials accountable, whether they are politicians, Judges, civil servants or holding positions of public trust.

  • BREAKING: CCT sacks Onnoghen, bars him for 10 years

    …Confiscates funds in his five accounts

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has found the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Walter Onnoghen guilty of violation of the code of conduct for public officers.

    CCT Chairman, Danladi Umar, in a judgment on Thursday, held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Onnoghen is guilty.

    CCT says it has jurisdiction to try Onnoghen made false asset declaration by deliberately omitting to declare the five domiciliary accounts he maintained with Standard Chartered Bank, and in which huge deposits were found.

    The tribunal after convicting him, ordered among others, his removal from office, barred him from holding public office for the next 10 years and confiscated the funds in the five accounts, which the tribunal said should be forfeited to the Federal Government.

    …more details later…

  • CCT judgment on Onnog‎hen moved from 9am till noon

    The judgment of the Code of Conduct Tribunal on Justice Walter Onnoghen, who is being arraigned on charges of assets declaration breaches, has been shifted from 9 am the originally scheduled time, till noon on Thursday.

    Onnoghen had arrived the premises of the tribunal at 8.40am ahead of the judgment.

    Only two of his lawyers and a handful of his assistants were seated in the courtroom when a court official announced the postponement at 9 am.

    No member of the prosecution team was in court when the postponement was announced

    None of them arrived as of the time of filing this report at 9.11am.

    Onnoghen had yet to step out ‎of his vehicle as of the time the postponement was announced.

    His convoy left the premises as soon as the information about the new development reached him.

    The Chairman of the CCT, Danladi Umar, after the trial and the defence, made closing arguments on Monday, specifically fixed judgment for 9 am on Thursday‎, a departure from the usual 10 am sitting time of the tribunal.

    Onnoghen reportedly resigned on April 4, he was indicted with alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers before the CCT on January 11, 2019, as a sitting CJN.

    Specifically, the Federal Government, acting through the Code of Conduct Bureau, had on January 11, filed against Onnoghen, six counts, accusing him in the first count of failure to declare his assets to the bureau between June 2005 and December 14, 2016.

    In the rest of the five counts, the defendant was alleged to have falsely declared his assets on December 14, 2016, by allegedly omitting to declare his domiciliary dollar, euro and pound sterling accounts as well as his two naira accounts, all maintained with Standard Chartered Bank (Nig.) Ltd.