Tag: Optimism

  • OKOH AIHE: Broadcast flakes in a season of optimism

    OKOH AIHE: Broadcast flakes in a season of optimism

    By Okoh Aihe

    Broadcasting has enjoyed some enormous coverage lately. Can you imagine that tweak or little speck of irony!

    The broadcast media itself enjoying the limelight in what may qualify as inversion of service delivery. From nowhere, a state governor generated a needless controversy by reclining on his imperial powers to order the closure of one of the radio stations in his state. Yes, Governor Mohammed Bago ordered the closure of Badeggi Radio 90.1FM, based in Minna, the state capital.

    The governor was genuinely indignant. The station was implicated by its radical posturing in accepting materials from opposition voices to balance its daily news presentations instead of doing only the bidding of the governor. That was akin to creating chaos in the state and stirring the anger of the governor who should be allowed to enjoy a coolness that can help him focus on other state matters. There was outrage.

    Professional bodies and Human Rights Organisations feel traduced by the insolence of an elected governor. The Federal Government took a very firm position on who the regulator is: the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), and not the governor!In a situation of chaos, facts enjoy ignoble ratings. An industry source told me that for daring to air news from other political parties outside of the ruling party, the station has since been labelled an opposition radio station, an unfortunate pigmentation that has stuck closer than leprosy.

    A source at the regulatory agency told this writer that the station was never truly shut but only suffered threats. Unfortunately, from the highest quarters of the state. What is the state of Badeggi FM? Is it on air? I have no reason not to believe the regulator.

    As it would turn out, what is happening in Niger State was a little prelude or a warped foretaste to what would unfold at the national level. The broadcast landscape quaked even more. The development has nothing to do with regulation but appointments. And ladies and gentlemen, appointments can be very important especially when they are political.

    The government, August 20, 2025, announced a new management team for the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA). The statement signed by Segun Imohiosen, Director of Information and Public Relations, Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, had Rotimi Pedro (Lagos State, South-West) as Director-General, Karimah Bello (Katsina State, representing the North-West) as Executive Director, Marketing, Stella Din-Jacob (Plateau, North Central), Executive Director, News, while Sophia Mohammed (Adamawa State) would take charge of NTA Enterprises Limited as Managing Director.

    The announcement effectively invalidated the tenure of Salihu Abdullahi Dembos and Ayo Adewuyi who were appointed Director-General and Executive Director, in October 2023, and September 2024, respectively.

    There is comedy, and there is also theatre of the absurd or if you prefer, drama of the absurd, when some kind of theatrics can happen somewhere in a drama presentation or for even an entire presentation, to put a lie to common sense or reason.

    Someone once called it “beyond belief.” In the Nigerian situation however, it is reality.A management team just changed mid flight? That very evening, a source in the broadcast industry told me that the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, who is usually very cool and had managed the information sector well for this government, perhaps cooler than Luka Modric when managing mid-field crisis for Real Madrid, was livid with anger, feeling very disdained and contemptuously overlooked. But he wasn’t the kind of person to raise a bedlam in public. He waited for the President to return to the country.

    The stage had been set for more drama. The minister wasn’t alone in his anger. You may want to observe that the statement wasn’t signed by Presidential spokesman, Bayo Onanuga. The reason he didn’t may forever be buried in the vault of secrets at the Presidency.Was the minister right in his indignation? Who are the people advising the President and splashing mud all over his body with their uninformed and sometimes very selfish decisions?The NTA Act is very clear on Membership of the Authority, Tenure of Office, and Removal from Office of Members of the Authority. I will reference only three sections. Section 2 (1) says, The Authority shall consist of the following members to be appointed by the President on the recommendation of the Minister. Under Section 3 (1), Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person appointed to be a member of the Authority, not being a public officer, shall hold office for a period of three years from the date of his appointment and shall be eligible for reappointment for one further period of three years.While my final point here is Section 4 (1), which says, If it appears to the Minister that a member of the Authority should be removed from office on the ground of misconduct or inability to perform the functions of his office, the Minister shall after consultation with the interests, if any, represented by thatmember make a recommendation to that effect to the President, and if the President approves the recommendation, the Minister may declare, in writing, the office of that member vacant.The minister plays a major role in the entire process but none of the above steps was followed.

    There were no complaints about the ability of the management to perform. The act was completely jettisoned for political expediency and advantage. I am sure that those who advised the President on the appointment fiasco told him a single story which was eventually balanced by the minister’s presentation.The President took his decision, a very firm one for that matter.

    It is a pity that some competent innocent men and women got caught in a needless miasma. It has always been my firm belief that the strength of every great person is to admit a failing and be able to take strong corrective measures to right it. The statement released September 2, 2025, by Bayo Onanuga on the President’s action, was very clear.“President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has directed the recall of Mr Salihu Dembos, the Director-General of the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), who briefly vacated the post following some management changes in the agency.“The President similarly directed the recall of Mr Ayo Adewuyi, the Executive Director of News, to complete his three-year tenure, which ends in 2027.

    Adewuyi was appointed by President Tinubu in 2024,” the statement adds with good measure. This is the way to deal with a situation without sowing seeds of discord.

    Just tame a hydra-headed ignoble behaviour by a few in the team without emotions, and it’s gone forever. Without doubt the NTA needs a platform of peace to reinvent itself and become relevant again. The station which describes itself as the biggest network in Africa lives on glory interred in the past.

    There is nothing wrong with self bravura, but there is everything wrong with rodomontade claims that carry little or no substance. NTA was once the big deal in Nigeria but the coming of private broadcasting in 1992, has nearly obliterated the dependability of a receding broadcast dodo that resisted modern broadcasting both in management style and content production, and even in technology. So, for the recalled directors, this is no moment to enjoy a victory lap but a fresh opportunity to sincerely diagnose the problems of the national broadcaster and rescue it from the cumbersomeness of the civil service strongly embedded in the system.

    There has to be a reason people are not watching NTA. It is not out of unpatriotism or spite for this government. The station shouldn’t present only government bulletins as news without the professional discipline and courage to state the alternative story.NTA needs help urgently. The management should be sincere enough to look at the demands the workers made when they met with the sacked team, and take decisions that may assuage their fears and guarantee a future that comes with hope.

  • Nigeria@61: Ex-President Jonathan urges optimism

    Nigeria@61: Ex-President Jonathan urges optimism

    Former president Goodluck Jonathan has called on Nigerians to be optimistic about the future of the country, in spite of the challenges currently being faced.

    Jonathan made the appeal in his goodwill message issued on Thursday in Abuja to Nigerians on the occasion of the nation’s 61st Independence anniversary.

    He said that the nation held abundant promises for the citizens, adding that Nigeria has what it takes to overcome today’s threats and trials.

    The former president encouraged the leaders and the citizens to rededicate themselves to the virtues of equity, justice, tolerance and strive to give their best for the good of the nation.

    He described independence day as a day of freedom which provides an opportunity to reflect on the country’s progress, celebrate its humble attainments and ponder over those dreams yet to be fulfilled.

    “I join all citizens to celebrate the 61st Independence Anniversary of our great nation, Nigeria.

    “As we mark this day of freedom, it gives us the opportunity to reflect on our progress, celebrate our humble attainments and ponder over those dreams that are yet to be fulfilled.

    “We may have hiccups along the way and challenging times that might be stretching our resolve and determination to forge ahead. But we should not relent nor succumb to fear, discouraging trials and threats of today.

    “We will never lose hope in our country and in our indomitable spirit and capacity to overcome difficult times, seize the moment and conquer,” Jonathan said.

    According to him, the journey of nationhood is a marathon, which requires patience, resilience, tolerance and determination.

    Jonathan said that the uncertainties of this time could bot be compared to the limitless promises in the country.

    “This time offers us a new opportunity to renew our drive towards attaining greater heights and secure our shared dreams and common vision.

    “As we celebrate, let us aggregate the successes, challenges and lessons of the last six decades and apply them towards a more prosperous future for us and upcoming generations.

    “Ours is a country blessed with numerous opportunities and prospects as well as great citizens, engaging diversity and versatility,” he said.

    Jonathan also urged all Nigerians to recharge their patriotism and rededicate themselves to the virtues of equity, justice and tolerance and strive to give their best for the good of the nation.

    “Let us remain optimistic, for the challenges of this time will rebound to a glorious fortune for us and generations yet to come,” he said.

  • Should the 2017 0.8% GDP growth rate induce optimism? By Henry Boyo

    Should the 2017 0.8% GDP growth rate induce optimism? By Henry Boyo

    By Henry Boyo

    The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), reported in March this year, that Nigeria’s annual Gross Domestic output had grown by 0.82 percent by December 2017; this marginal growth rate has nonetheless, been commended generally, as a welcome reversal from the negative -1.58 percent contraction which was recorded by December 2016.


    Notably, however, the related euphoria from the marginal annual growth rate, is probably lost on millions of our countrymen, who still endure severe economic and social deprivations, without any visible hope of respite.
    Consequently, the relevant question, therefore, is whether the collective pangs of hunger and deepening mass poverty, which are largely driven by double digit inflation and unemployment rate above 20 percent, can be ameliorated by the positive growth rate, recently published by NBS.


    This question and related issues will be examined, hereafter, in the following interrogative prose. Please read on:
    Does the reported annual GDP growth of 0.82 percent for 2017 suggest that Nigeria’s economy has turned the corner, after the contraction recorded in output of goods and services between 2016-2017? Can we expect improvement in social welfare, poverty reduction and employment opportunities?


    The present modest rise in GDP is primarily instigated, as in the past, by the spike in oil price, from near $30/barrel to a steady $60-70/barrel in recent times. Consequently, if crude prices further rise or remain stable above $60/barrel, the related nominal rise in GDP rate may infact exceed 10 percent as recorded in 2003 and 2004 when oil price bounced to $42.9 and $56.7/barrel respectively. However, if as usual, such higher growth rates, remain, primarily, pumped up by higher crude oil price and revenue, then, the higher growth rates recorded may, regrettably still fail to drive inclusive growth or improve mass social welfare in Nigeria.


    Instructively, if GDP growth rate remains below IMF’s current projection of 2.1 percent in 2018, one will be misguided to expect any positive difference on our lives, especially, when population growth is also projected to rise simultaneously by 3 percent annually.

    So, if per-chance oil price further rises and instigates double digit growth rates in GDP, is it not reasonable to expect that, employment opportunities will increase and that life will become ‘more abundant’ with increasing social equity in Nigeria?


    Well, it depends, on what happens to inflation; this is not the first time that oil price has spiked favourably. In fact, oil price was exceptionally high at $140/barrel in 2008, and, yet GDP grew by just about 10 percent. Unfortunately, however, inflation also ran into double digits at 11.6 percent during the same period.


    Instructively, an inflation rate of 10 percent will, invariably, wipe off 50 percent purchasing power of all income earners every five years, and impoverish everyone with static incomes; thus, pensioners particularly, and millions of other Nigerians, whose incomes are predicated on the legislated minimum wage will become very, very vulnerable.
    So, do you mean that higher crude oil prices and revenue can actually make us poorer?


    The answer is self evident, from a historical perspective, as explained above. Oil price may never again approach $140/barrel, but at least, we know that when, such exceptionally high price prevailed, the related bountiful dollar revenue ironically, did not, induce any significant improvement in mass social welfare and national economic development. Unfortunately, the relatively high inflation rates, which also evolved, not only severely contracted consumer demand but also instigated higher cost of borrowing to make productive investment very expensive and risky.


    Furthermore, fiscal allocations values are also constantly eroded by rising inflation rates which invariably challenge full budget implementation every year.


    Arguably, Nigeria inexplicably fell into the ball pack of the world’s poorest nations, ironically, even when oil prices shot up from below $10/barrel in 1999 to $140/barrel in 2008. Alarmingly, the Naira exchange rate has also, unexpectedly collapsed from less than N80=$1 with barely $4bn reserves between 1995-8 to N305-360/$1 with over $40bn reserves and still rising in 2018.


    So are you saying that increasing oil price and dollar reserves, may not necessarily facilitate, the provision of, improved infrastructure for education, health, mass transportation and power?


    Yes, you are right, the above realities are well amplified in our recent economic history. Higher oil prices and increasing dollar reserves have also failed to increase job opportunities or improve social welfare or National security.


    So, why are we unable to translate increasing export revenue and dollar reserves to the creation of a much ‘better life’ with less inequality for our people?


    Obviously, the process adopted for the infusion of our oil export revenue into the economy is actually responsible for the unexpected distortion to our reasonable expectations for increasing job opportunities and a ‘better life’. The present payments model, invariably dictates, that, although increasing income from crude oil export may actually instigate GDP growth, in statistical terms, however the “diabolical” payments system adopted for infusing dollar income from crude sales into the economy has unfortunately, continued to challenge the attainment of truly inclusive growth.


    Invariably, the product of the aberration, of the forex infusion process, is vividly reflected in the oppressive eternal presence of bloated Naira surpluses which continuously feed and sustain higher rates of inflation, every time dollar allocations become substituted with Naira vouchers by CBN. So the reality seems to be that higher dollar earnings, unwittingly, increase the threat of spiraling inflation and therefore reduces the purchasing power of all incomes to deepen mass poverty! There is however, nothing to suggest that lower dollar income will be a more welcome option.
    So, is there a way out of this double-digit inflation rate? How can we make life better for more Nigerians?


    The simple answer is to bring down inflation to international best practice rates below 3 percent, so that all income values will also be protected, to sustain a level of consumer demand that will spur productive investment and create more jobs. Infact, best practice management of inflation is the first battlefront of any responsible Administration. It is for this reason that the CBN is constitutionally empowered to manage price stability, so that the living standards of every wage earner will always be protected.


    Unfortunately CBN’s attraction to its subordinate role as the manager of Nigeria’s reserves has possibly dimmed the vision of the Apex bank from the prime object of its existence, which is price stability.


    So, if inflation comes down to best practice rate below 3 percent, will the level of poverty diminish?

    Yes, people’s income will command more value and the domestic stress in most households will be lessened. Furthermore, rising consumer demand will invariably attract more investment in productive enterprises, with more job opportunities.


    Instructively, no rational person lends out money below the prevailing rate of inflation; in other words, the rate of borrowing is a function of the prevailing inflation rate.


    Consequently, with inflation below 3 percent, CBN’s monetary policy rate, which dictates the cost of borrowing in the money market, will also plummet to make the abiding dream of manufacturers for 5 percent interest rate on loans possible. Invariably, with increasing production enterprise, more job opportunities will also be created, while government revenue from additional personal and corporate taxes will also expand.


    Final question, how do you bring down inflation to best practice rate below 3 percent?


    CBN should stop compounding the unforced error of persistent Naira surpluses whenever it deliberately creates more Naira, in replacement for dollar denominated allocations to the 3 tiers of government. The adoption of straightforward dollar warrants will gradually quell the threat of persistent Naira liquidity which inevitably drives inflation and pulverizes the Naira exchange rate beyond our economy’s comfort zone.


    Incidentally, even if oil price revenue remains favourable, while Naira rate remains under constant pressure, another devaluation which will send Nigeria’s GDP crashing well below, $300bn down from about $450bn, just 2 years ago, will be inevitable!