Tag: Political Parties

  • Members of NURTW cannot support any political party – Chairman

    Members of NURTW cannot support any political party – Chairman

    The National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) has declared that no politician can use its members for campaigns again.

    The Kwara Chairman of the union, Alhaji AbdulKareem AbdulRasak, made this known on Monday in Ilorin.

    AbdulRasak said that NURTW members were part of stakeholders to ensure free and fair elections, adding that the rules that govern them did not allow any member to belong to any political party.

    “Once you are a member of NURTW, you cannot support any political party, not to talk of campaign for them or move around with them.

    “It has been stated that anyone found participating in political rally or fighting for a particular politician to win will be punished accordingly and also dismissed from the union.

    “This is to ensure free and fair election and also to have peace and stability in the country before, during and after election,” he said.

    The chairman explained that many people had wrong mindset about commercial drivers, as they believe that majority were trouble makers and irresponsible people.

    Accoding to him, the transport union has being in existence for the past four decades and many of its members had made lots of successes and achievements.

    “No more thugs and hooligans in NURTW. We are responsible and respected people now and many people are willing to associate with us and even give us their daughters in marriage,” he said.

    AbdulRasak said that the President of NURTW, Alhaji Tahjudeen Baruwa, had ensured that the union members were well catered for by making the work easy and free of corrupt leaders.

    “All the tickets issued at every car park all over the 36 states have been centralised as it is printed from the headquarters in Abuja, and as such, cannot be tampered with,” he said.

    On security, the chairman said that none of their members had experienced any security challenges, saying that it is due to the grace of Almighty Allah and proper arrangements made by the union, security agencies and government.

    “A meeting was held at the national level and a memo was passed to everyone that no one should move above the scheduled time of 6 a.m to 9 p.m.

    “However, there is an arrangement made for night travelers, as few drivers usually operate at some car parks, to enable travelers get to their various destinations when they arrived,” he said.

    The NURTW boss commended the administration of Mallam AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq for his role in ensuring peace during the last union election that produced him as chairman.

    He commended the governor’s effort towards the betterment of transporters in the state, but solicited for more support for the drivers to move within and outside the state easily.

    NAN

  • Ekiti 2022: INEC issues out warnings ahead of governorship election

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has appealed to its staffers to adhere strictly to the commission’s code of conduct, display sense of responsibility and firmly restrict any unethical behaviour during the June 18 Ekiti governorship election.

    This was contained in a statement signed and released by the commission’s chairman Prof. Mahmood Yakubu.

    Yakubu appealed to them to restrict any urge to favour one party above another during and after the Ekiti guber poll.

    Yakubu said from June 2021 when INEC released the timetable and schedule of activities for the poll, it had collectively implemented several activities and taken every step to guarantee a free, fair, credible and inclusive process.

    “This election is coming seven months after the successful conduct of the Anambra State Governorship Election in November 2021, but it will be historic because it will be the first governorship election to be conducted based on the provisions of the new Electoral Act 2022.

    “At the stakeholders’ meeting held on Tuesday, I assured the political parties, their flagbearers and the good people of Ekiti State that the choice of who becomes the next governor of the State is entirely in the hands of the voters.

    “I said so confidently, because I strongly believe in the commitment, efficiency, and determination of all of you, our dedicated staff, to ensure a level-playing field on Election Day, which is just 48 hours away,” he said.

  • 2023: INEC gives parties deadline to submit names of candidates

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced the closure of all political party primaries effective Thursday, June 9, 2022.

    INEC has also began the process of inputting party flagbearers in the data base ahead of next year’s general election.

    INEC made its position known   at the  meeting of State Resident Electoral Commissioners at the Commission’s headquarters on Thursday.

    The INEC Chairman, Prof Mahmood Yakubu, informed that beginning from Friday, the 10th, to the 17th of June, the 18 political parties in the country are required to upload names and other details of their candidates, including those of presidents and their running mates, Senatorial and federal House of Representatives Candidates.

    The commission has also given state governorship candidates  till July 15th to provide names of their deputies, while parties are meant to submit names of state assembly candidates  too.

    Emphasizing the need for parties to be proactive in responding to deadlines, Yakubu cautioned that the nomination portal would shut down automatically by 6 pm on the 17th for national election candidates and 15th July for those of state election

    “All Political Parties are required to upload the details of their candidates for each constituency to the INEC Candidate Nomination Portal (ICNP). To achieve this objective, four officials recommended by each of the 18 political parties were trained on the procedure for uploading the nomination forms to the dedicated web portal. Confidential Access Codes to the portal have already been given to each Political Party to facilitate the uploading of its nominations.

    “For emphasis, the Commission wishes to remind Political Parties that only the names of candidates that emerged from democratic primaries as provided by Sec. 84 of the Electoral Act 2022 shall be submitted to the Commission. Similarly, the list of all Presidential and Governorship candidates must be accompanied by the names of their running mates (i.e. Vice Presidential and Deputy Governorship candidates) without which the nomination is invalid.

    “All nominations must be uploaded to the portal on/or before the deadlines. The portal will automatically shut down at 6.00pm (1800hrs) on Friday 17th June 2022 for national elections and 6.00pm (1800hrs) on Friday 15th July 2022 for State elections.

    “Nomination Centre has been set up here at the Commission’s Headquarters to receive and process all nominations by political parties, including dedicated telephone lines to serve as Help Desk for any Party that may need assistance”.

    The INEC Chairman said the Commission is responding to a request to deploy more CVR machines to needy States and LGAs to enhance CVR in areas disrupted by insecurity, assuring that no prospective registrants would be left out.

  • 2023: Adhere to deadline for submission of candidate nominations – Yakubu to political parties

    The Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, has advised political parties to adhere to the deadline for submission of candidate nominations for the 2023 general elections.

    Yakubu gave the advice on Friday when he visited the venue of the training organised by the commission for political party officials.

    The training was on how to use the new INEC Candidate Nomination Portal (ICNP) for the 2023 general elections.

    Yakubu, according to the statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr Rotimi Oyekanmi, visited all the six groups under the training to ascertain that the party officials understand what they were being taught.

    The INEC chairman urged the officials to carefully note the respective commencement dates and deadlines for the submission/uploading of the candidates’ nomination forms for the national and state elections to the portal.

    Yakubu reminded the party officials of all information contained in the timetable and schedule of activities for the coming general elections.

    He said that the online submission of nomination forms EC9A, 9B, 9C, 9D and 9E for national elections – presidential and national assembly would start from June 10 and end June 17.

    Yakubu added that the dates for the submission of nomination forms for state elections – governorship and state assembly remained between July 1 and July 15.

    He assured the party officials that INEC would render technical or any other support they might require while using the portal.

    The training began on Wednesday June 1 and would end on Saturday 4 June.

    INEC National Commissioner, Mrs May Agbamuche-Mbu, while declaring open the four-day training workshop in Abuja on Wednesday, said that ICNP had been in use since the 2020 Edo and Ondo State governorship elections.

    Agbamuche-Mbu said that the portal was recently redesigned to accommodate the greater demands of a wider and general election nomination process.

    She said that the new provisions in the Electoral Act (2022), which makes provision for several technological innovations, had given INEC the discretion to apply technology where necessary.

  • INEC, political parties meet in Abuja over elections timetable

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the 18 approved  political parties under the umbrella  of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC) will today meet in Abuja to deliberate on election matters and adjustments of election timetable initially released by the commission.

    The outcome of the meeting will determine if there will be adjustments to the timetable or not.

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the 18 approved  political parties under the umbrella  of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC) will today meet in Abuja to deliberate on election matters and adjustments of election timetable initially released by the commission.

    INEC had reviewed its schedules for the 2023 general elections in Nigeria in February after the President Buhari assented to the 2022 Electoral Act.

    In compliance with the new Electoral Acts, the commission fixed April 4 to June 3 for the election of flag bearers of all political parties for the 2023 elections.

    Political parties under the aegis of IPAC and political actors have continued to mount pressure on the commission to extend the June 3 deadline for the primaries.

    Meanwhile, the civil society organisations and prominent Nigerians, including a former chairman of INEC, Prof. Attahiru Jega, have warned the commission against yielding to the demands of the political parties.

    Jega said shifting the deadline would be a recipe for disaster.

    IPAC, during a parley with the INEC held earlier this month urged the commission to shift the deadline by 37 days.

    IPAC chairman , Yabagi Sani, accused the commission of not carrying leadership of political parties along while designing the timetable and schedule of activities for the 2023 elections.

    Sani made reference to Salah break, forthcoming Ekiti and Osun States governorship elections, could affect a strict and smooth compliance with the timetable.

    A chieftain of the APC, Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, had accused INEC of endangering the conduct of the 2023 general elections with what he alleged to be its “plots and partisan interests”.

    While warning of looming danger from the “tight INEC schedule of primaries imposed on political parties in the country”, he said the commission’s schedule “has been influenced purely by a section of the political elites who have positioned themselves to benefit from this INEC calendar.”

    According to him, it was not the business of INEC to fix dates of primaries in as much as the primaries were conducted 180 days before the election in accordance with the provision of extant law.

    But responding, the Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman, Rotimi Oyekanmi, said the extant laws give INEC the power, as a regulator of political parties, to determine when party primaries should take place.

    Oyekanmi told journalists that the extension being sought by parties, if granted, would disrupt the planning template for the 2023 general election with dire consequences.

    He said, “The timetable and schedule of activities for the 2023 general election was released as far back as February this year, one full year ahead of the election. The conduct of primaries was fixed for April 4 – June 3, 2022.

    “The extant laws, indeed, give INEC the power, as a regulator of political parties, to determine when party primaries should take place, contrary to the gentleman’s view. It is quite obvious that he has not read the Electoral Act, which is quite disappointing)

    “The INEC Chairman had, on at least three occasions, urged the political parties to conduct their primaries within the stipulated timeline, as no extension will be entertained.

    “The extension being sought, if granted, would disrupt the planning template for the 2023 general election, with dire consequences.

    “Why is it that the parties cannot conduct their primaries within two months (April and May)? Interestingly, none of them complained about the timeline for party primaries when the timetable was released in February. Why now?”

     

  • 2023: NUJ urge political parties to stop barring members from covering their activities

    2023: NUJ urge political parties to stop barring members from covering their activities

    The Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) has urged political parties in Enugu State to desist from barring its members from covering their activities/programmes ahead of 2023 general elections.

    Mr Sam Udekwe, the Chairman of NUJ, Enugu State Chapter, made the call during a telephone interview with newsmen on Thursday in Enugu, following the debarment of journalists by some political parties in the state.

    Thenewsguru.com recalled that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) had, in their South-East Governorship Screening and Ward Congress to elect delegates in Enugu, barred journalists from covering the event.

    Thenewsguru.com reports that the seven-member panel that conducted the screening at the PDP Zonal Office, Enugu in April, refused to address newsmen after they had waited up to 6:30pm.

    Udekwe, who described the action as condemnable, said the constitution empowers journalists to do certain duties which they are debarred from.

    “As parties are allowed to carry out their activities, they should not deny the media theirs.

    “What we know as democracy is not actually what we see all over the country. People carry out their duties without minding infringing into the right of other institutions.

    “Freedom of Information Act is there but how often are they accepting these laws, they are supposed to be implemented.

    “We are not investigating any political party but to propagate their activities selflessly,” he said, and appealed to political parties to cooperate with the media.

    He said, “The media have the right to hold government accountable for the people and we cannot do this assignment if barred.

    “They should support us and we promise that we will not be lopsided in our reportage.

    “Political parties should give media in the state the latitude to serve them better,” Udekwe said.

  • Aisha Buhari to host all Presidential aspirants from various political parties for Ramadan Iftar dinner

    Aisha Buhari to host all Presidential aspirants from various political parties for Ramadan Iftar dinner

    Nigeria’s First Lady, Aisha Buhari, would on Saturday have a Ramadan Iftar dinner with all Presidential aspirants from various political parties, who are not to come along with their mobile devices.

     

    In an invitation letter, the dinner would take place at the State House Conference Centre, Abuja.

     

    The invitees were strictly instructed to come only with their invitation cards which would serve as their entry pass.

     

    It was gathered that the instruction does not apply to Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, governors and ministers who are expected to be at the meeting.

     

    Spokesperson of the First Lady, Aliyu Abdullahi, who confirmed the meeting said, “There is nothing here. This is a standard operational protocol in the Villa when you are having a meeting with either of the three occupants of the Presidency.

     

    “If they are coming for an event, this is supposed to be DSS enforced when the president is having an event or the Vice President is having an event or the first lady is having an event. Because outsiders will come. That’s the security and standard protocol.

     

    “That does not apply to the Vice President. How can you expect that to apply to the Vice President or even to ministers?”

  • Rascality of political parties and 2023 election – By Dakuku Peterside

    Rascality of political parties and 2023 election – By Dakuku Peterside

    Democracy thrives with the rule of law. The fundamental principle is that the law is always supreme and must be the guiding spirit of all actions in public life. Those who fail to abide by the letter and spirit of the law get punished. If a law is found wanting or repressive, using the instruments of the legislature or judiciary, the law is interpreted, amended, or repealed. The constitution is the bedrock of the law, and any rule or law that conflicts with the constitution is null and void and of no effect. These are the foundations on which our democracy is built. Instead of abiding by these principles, politicians, political parties, and power wielders act rascally and abuse the laws with impunity. Little wonder, the INEC recently warned all political actors and parties to comply with the constitution, the electoral act, the provisions of their own constitutions, and the guidelines issued by INEC.

    Is there anything in our genes or nature that says we cannot obey rules? From historical antecedents, Nigerian political parties and political elite have little or no room for compliance with rules, laws and statues, and I mean any law at all. Nigerian political parties can pass for a good study in lawlessness and rascality. Partly, this may be why there is increased judicial intervention in our politics, both in internal party affairs and in electoral outcomes.

    In our democracy, political parties are supposed to be vital institutions that provide the platform under which people participate in politics. Using a football analogy, political parties are like football clubs where all members share the same hope and aspirations that the club succeeds in football games and tournaments. The club creates its brand, ideology, and essence and puts in place the administration to select, coach and mobilise a team to compete effectively in football tournaments. So, the club is not just a vehicle for winning football games but an institution that represents an ideology, a way of life and the collective vision of its members and supporters.

    Likewise, political parties are not just vehicles for winning elections, but critical institutions of democracy built on solid values, ideologies, and visions. As a critical democratic institution, a party must allow rules and laws to guide the power struggle. When this is not the case, anarchy is inevitable.

    Parties must never cherry-pick which rules or laws to comply with and which ones to jettison. This flagrant disregard for the rule of law, even parties’ own constitution, has led to great distrust by the people and is part of our perennial leadership malaise. No matter what political party leadership says, Nigerians are sceptical that there is no place for rules in this part of the world. At least, this is what the political actors have sown in the minds and heads of citizens. Nigerians now believe politics is a game with no rules, not fit for anybody with a modicum of moral foundation.

    This lawlessness and impunity exhibited by parties force the exclusion of capable leaders from joining politics. It is disturbing that whenever I discuss with great private sector leaders the importance of joining politics to increase the quantity and quality of leadership in our political space and enrich our democracy, and better the lives of our people, they often come back with “this your Nigerian politics is too dirty and uninspiring for us”. The famous social scientist Professor McKenzie probably had Nigeria in mind when he warned several years ago that “if the rules limiting the struggle for power are not observed more or less faithfully, the game will disappear amid the wreckage of the whole system”.

    However, Nigerian parties are victims of society’s rascality, which started in the military era, but they have gone ahead to perfect the lawlessness and rascality with impunity. Our political parties and stakeholders chose to borrow and adopt a military culture of impunity where a tiny clique of influential party leaders believes their interests are above the party rules and the law of the land. The rules and laws make no meaning to these political overlords, and they breach the rules and laws, and political parties expect that there will be no consequences. The rascality of political actors have led to the emergence of judicial rascality especially on matters of political dispute.

    Political rascality is an open invitation to anarchy which we are yet to realise because the political elite often got away with it. The established norm is that the rules to which we collectively subscribe guide the right of the individual members of a political party and citizens.

    Recently, INEC also called on parties not to conduct primaries outside the constituencies for which parties are nominating candidates in line with Section 84 of the Electoral Act 2022. This rule is clear, and all parties know about it. However, it will not surprise anyone interested in politics in Nigeria when some parties flagrantly begin to break this rule and conduct primaries outside the constituencies for which the parties nominate candidates. In the past, we had examples of party primaries happening entirely outside of the constituencies or sometimes in “unknown” places for the interest of some selfish leaders within the party.

    Also, INEC has provided a nascent timetable of political activities. We expect the parties to follow this timetable and abide by the procedural and operational guidelines stipulated by INEC. Some parties neglect this timetable and dictates of the procedures and rules as stipulated by INEC and superimpose their own on the party for various ulterior motives that may be anti-democratic.

    In the internal processes of some Nigerian political parties, the personal interest of the leaders dominates the collective interest and good. Personality cult, blind loyalty to individuals, opportunism, personalised rule triumph over generally accepted rules and laws. They trivialise respect for laws and rules and popular participation. Some leaders foist candidates on the party based on parochial interest that is not in the interest of the party or the country.

    This anomaly has led to a situation where people with no proven record of leadership or people management occupy sensitive positions of authority with no knowledge or skills to perform and no moral standing to do what is right other than doing what the leader wants. In this circumstance, democracy and the people suffer. Following the party’s rules as stipulated in the party’s constitution, the electoral act and the constitution will only strengthen democracy and attract quality and suitable people to take leadership responsibilities.

    This rascality of parties has led to increased intraparty conflicts and pre-election litigations. In the past, such intraparty conflicts and pre-election litigations were a rarity. Since this current democratic dispensation, there has been a phenomenal upsurge in such matters, significantly impacting Nigeria’s electoral process. Some of such matters have reached the supreme court. Furthermore, the judicial decisions at the apex court on these issues have re(shaped) our electoral ecosystem for generations to come.

    I must state that there is a need for our country to move back to the period when such intraparty conflict hardly existed, much more occupying the precious time of our justices to adjudicate matters that they would rather not venture into at all.

    There are many examples where the rascality of parties has cost the parties and their members dearly. The example of Zamfara State APC is still fresh in our minds. In the Zamfara case, the supreme court’s decision significantly impacted the electoral system and allowed another incursion of the judiciary into our politics. The parties are still reeling from the consequences of the intraparty conflicts that led to the problems.

    I hope all stakeholders must work hard to avert such conflict and minimize judicial intervention in electoral outcomes. The basics of most intraparty conflicts are the impunity and rascality of the party and the party leadership, and they must reduce this to the barest minimum. They are, in fact, the bane of our democracy.

    The rascality of parties is heinous in three significant ways. It is wishful thinking to expect a group of lawless individuals to lead a peaceful and prosperous country based on law and order. No group of individuals, be they a political party or otherwise, can give what they do not have. Besides, if the political parties can disregard their constitution, ignore INEC guidelines, breach the electoral act, and assault the country’s constitution, then democracy is in danger. Furthermore, a political party lacking internal cohesion and discipline cannot successfully administer the state or the people even if it succeeds in winning elections.

    We expect parties to have mechanisms for internal discipline, internal self-correction, and internal protection of the rule of law. Nigerian political parties must follow the laws. They must provide platforms credible enough to form governments that are peopled with individuals who agree with and abide by the ideology and principles embedded in the party, have the leadership qualities to deliver dividends of democracy to all and have an overwhelming desire to obey the rules and laws of the parties, INEC, the Electoral Act, and the constitution of the country. Intraparty conflicts which often lead to pre-election litigations are bad omens that do us no good, and they subtract from our democracy and are distractions from the serious business of leading and serving the people.

    In the end , I recommend that political parties set up mechanisms to ensure that the parties abide by all the rules and laws guiding internal party systems and external party activities regarding pre- election, election, and post-election. Leaders in political parties should stop any actions or inactions that are undemocratic and unlawful, which is the basis of conflict within the party. The personal and selfish interests of leaders must be subsumed whilst the collective interest of the members must dominate. Nigerians are becoming politically savvy. Recent events show that Nigerian youths are waking up to their responsibilities and are mobilising to make an impact. Any party that neglects this fact and goes back to “business as usual” may be creating its doom. In the 2023 general elections, let us say no to party rascality and impunity!

  • Supreme Court upholds de-registration of 22 political parties by INEC

    Supreme Court upholds de-registration of 22 political parties by INEC

    The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the de-registration of 22 political parties by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    The parties were among the 74 scrapped in 2020 by INEC following their dismal performances in previous elections. Respondents in the appeal are the attorney-general of the federation (AGF) and INEC.

    The parties are Advanced Congress of Democrats (ACD), Advanced Nigeria Democratic Party (ANDP), All Blending Party (ABP), All Grand Alliance Party (AGAP), Alliance of Social Democrats (ASD), Change Advocacy Party (CAP), Democratic People’s Congress (DPC), Green Party of Nigeria (GPN), Masses Movement of Nigeria (MMN) and Mega Party of Nigeria (MPN).

    Others are New Generation Party of Nigeria (NGPA), Nigeria For Democracy (NFD), Peoples Coalition Party (PCP), Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA), People for Democratic Change (PDC), Young Democratic Party (YDP), Re-Build Nigeria Party (RBNP), Save Nigeria Congress (SNC), Socialist Party of Nigeria (SPN), United Democratic Party (UDP), United Patriots (UP) and We The People of Nigeria (WTPN).

    Delivering Judgment, Justice Ejembi Eko, in an appeal instituted by INEC against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, voided and set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja division which had nullified the de-registration.

    Eko held that the appeal court on its own raised the issue of lack of fair hearing in favour of the 22 scrapped parties and arrived at a conclusion without hearing from other parties in the matter.

    “This appeal by INEC is meritorious and is hereby allowed. The decision of the court below is set aside”, Eko said.

    The apex court held that the court of appeal took out the issue of fair hearing out of the contemplation of the notice of appeal filed by the political parties but refused to do the needful in order to be fair to others in the matter.

    It said that the court of appeal erred in law by raising the issue of fair hearing in favour of the political parties suo motu and declined to give opportunity to other respondents to address it on the matter in order to arrive at a just conclusion.

    Eko said that proceeding to give judgment in such a situation as done by the Court of Appeal ran foul of the pillar of the same fair hearing and as such, its findings and conclusion cannot stand.

    INEC had on Feb. 6, 2020 de-registered 74 political parties for failing to win any political office in the last general election.

    The Advanced Congress of Democrats (ACD) and 21 other parties sued at the Federal High Court in Abuja to challenge their de-registration by INEC.

    In a judgment on June 11, 2020, the Federal High Court dismissed the suit on the grounds that INEC was empowered to de-register parties that failed to win elections.

    The court held that Section 225(a), (b) and (c) of the Constitution could be construed disjointively to imply that INEC possesses the power to deregister parties.

    On appeal to the Court of Appeal, Abuja, the appellate court, in its judgment in August 2020 said although INEC could de-register parties, it was wrong to have deregistered ACD and 21 other parties while their case was pending in court.

    Delivering judgment on Aug. 10, 2020, a panel led by Monica Dongban-Mensem, appeal court president, unanimously overturned the judgment of the lower court.

    The court held that INEC ignored due process in exercising its powers under section 225(a) of the constitution (as amended).

    The panel noted that the parties already filed their suit at the lower court which was yet to be determined before the deregistration.

    Also, the appellate court held that INEC had failed to give reasons to the parties on why they could no longer exist.

    The court held that section 40 of the constitution gives citizens the right to the freedom of association, and as such, the right conferred on a political party cannot be taken away except in accordance with the provisions of the law and due process.

    Dongban-Mensem said the appellants did not challenge INEC’s powers as enshrined on section 225(a) of the constitution but the process by which they were deregistered.

    Consequently, the court ordered that the appellants should be listed as political parties in the country.

  • Political parties backed by law to conduct primary elections – INEC

    Political parties backed by law to conduct primary elections – INEC

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Wednesday said political parties are backed by law to conduct primary elections.

    INEC Chairman, Information and Voter Committee, Festus Okoye stated this on Wednesday on a monitored Channels Television programme.

    “The conduct of primaries is within the domestic realm of the various political parties,” he said while making reference to Section 87 of the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.

    “But the only thing Section 87 makes clear is that in conducting their party primaries, the various political parties must be democratic and also conform to internal democratic principles within their own framework”.

    Okoye also reacted to the recent passage of the electronic transmission of election results by the Senate chamber of the National Assembly.

    While noting that the issue was in view, the INEC official said the Conference Committee would have to meet before sending the bill to President Muhammadu Buhari for his assent.

    He explained that once the bill has been signed, it becomes binding on the electoral umpire for implementation in future elections.

    “When you have direct primaries and you say the commission must monitor all the direct primaries of the political parties, the implication is that if the political parties are organising their primaries in every ward, the commission must deploy to over 8,809 registration areas to go and monitor the primaries of these political parties.

    “That is huge resources in terms of the personnel that will be deployed and also in terms of cost involved. But the moment the law is passed, the commission will not have challenges in obeying the law,” Okoye added.

    His remarks come a day after the Senate bowed to pressure and gave INEC the sole power to determine the mode of transmission of results.

    This followed the reversal of the Senate’s earlier decision that INEC may consider the electronic transmission of results “provided national [network] coverage is adjudged to be adequate and secure” by the Nigerian Communications Commission and approved by the National Assembly.

    Under a new amendment of Clause 52 (2) of the Electoral Act Amendment Bill, the Senate resolved that “voting at an election and transmission of results under this Bill shall be in accordance with the procedure determined by the Commission, which may include electronic voting.”