Tag: Politics

  • PDP Governors shun politics, declare readiness to support FG fight against insecurity

    PDP Governors shun politics, declare readiness to support FG fight against insecurity

    The People’s Democratic Party Governors’ Forum (PDP-GF) has pledged to support the Federal Government to address insecurity and restore peace in troubled areas of the country.

    The Chairman of the Forum and Gov. Aminu Tambuwal of Sokoto State, said this while briefing newsmen at the end of the forum’s first physical meeting held on Thursday in Abuja.

    Tambuwal said that the PDP governors agreed to support the federal government initiatives in ensuring that whatever would re-establish peace in Nigeria, be it discussion, negotiations or kinetic approach.

    This is a very productive meeting that review the situation of the country, the security challenges in the country.

    “As governors of the PDP, we have agreed and resolved to continue to work with the federal government with the sole aim of reestablishing peace in troubled areas of the federation.

    “We must not play politics with security and we must all work together to ensure that we bring back peace in our land.

    “So we have agreed to continue to work with the federal government in that regard.”

    Tambuwal said that the forum however appealed to President Muhammadu Buhari to continue to support state governments in the discharge of their mandates.

    “We are appealing to Mr President to reconsider certain measures by bringing more succour and relief to the people of Nigeria.

    “He should support state governments in the discharge of their mandate, by making available resources to the States.

    “This is important so that we can execute our mandate and ensure that we engender good governance and good condition of living in our respective states throughout the country.”

    On PDP, Tambuwal commended the National Working Committee (NWC) initiative for constituting the National Reconciliation Committee to reconcile aggrieved members of the party across the country.

    “We have received interim report from that committee. They are doing very well and we are encouraging them to continue in that regard.

    “The governor’s forum is going to back their efforts strongly so that we can possibly bring back those members of our party who have left out of anger and certain situations.”

    Tambuwal also said that no member of the forum was contemplating of leaving PDP for another party.

    “As you can see, most if not all of the governors of the PDP attended this meeting.

    “This a very clear statement that no governor of PDP is contemplating leaving the party for any other party.

    “We are brothers and we have committed ourselves to the party and to ensure that we continue to deliver on our mandate to the people of our respective states.”

    Tambuwal said that the governors also agreed to work together with the NWC of the party to continue with what they started.

    On e-registration of members of the party, Tambuwal said the governors appealed to the NWC to immediately set up machinery in motion to actualise it.

    He also disclosed that the forum set up three committees on finance, legal matters and legislative interface.

    The committee on finance is being led by the forum’s Deputy Chairman and Gov. Ben Ayade of Cross River; legislative matters by the governor of Bauchi, Bala Mohammed, and that of legal matters, led by Gov. Nyesom Wike of Rivers.

    On the protest by the Nigeria Labour Congress on alleged plans to move minimum wage from executive to concurrent list, Tambuwal described the accusation by the NLC as misplaced.

    He said that no governor advocated for that.

    Former Senate President and Chairman, PDP National Reconciliation Committee, Sen. Bukola Saraki, speaking to journalists after the meeting, said the committee briefed the governors on its efforts to reunite the party.

    “We briefed them on efforts we have made so far, what we have been able to achieve, our strategy, and how we are going to work together,” he said.

    He said that the committee efforts was already yielding positive results.

    “We had stakeholders that were not ready working together. Now they’re working together, they are meeting.

    “We have states where we have differences. People now are coming together.”

    Also in attendance were governors of Abia, Delta, Oyo, Edo, Enugu, Bayelsa, Benue, Zamfara states and deputy governor of Adamawa.

  • Remove your minds from politics, Umahi tells Ebonyi youths

    Remove your minds from politics, Umahi tells Ebonyi youths

    Ebonyi State Governor, Dave Umahi, has cautioned youths of the state against indulging in politics, telling them to be successful first.

    The governor gave this directive on Wednesday during an Ebonyi State #EndSARS Summit hosted by the state government in Abakaliki.

    Umahi said, “Remove your minds from politics and succeed first. Those who are manipulating politics are the wealthy men and women.

    “That man that made every one of us be a councillor, go and find out his situation. Has he made any progress? The answer is no.

    “I hear government should provide jobs. Let us even say jobs are provided, N30, 000 minimum wages. In one year, it is N360, 000. What are you doing with that?”

    The governor said he is under pressure by the people in his village, noting that his predecessors had employed people from their villages while being at the helms of affairs in the state.

    He told the youths that his decision not to follow the path of ex-governors of Ebonyi State was not impoverish the people who he said were the future leaders.

    Governor Umahi recalled that while he served as the Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the state, the executive members of the party were business people.

    “You can only give what you have. Some of you run after the politicians, some of them never went to school. Some of them have nothing to offer, they brainwash you.

    “You become their thugs, their families are overseas. It is our own, what are you doing at a party? A party you know in Ebonyi State is me,” he added.

    The governor also charged youths in the state to remain steadfast in the pursuit of their dreams.

    The event brought together youths from the 13 local government areas served as an avenue to inculcate right values that aim to make them better citizens.

  • How my involvement in politics, decision to run for U.S. President ruined my marriage – Kanye West

    How my involvement in politics, decision to run for U.S. President ruined my marriage – Kanye West

    Kanye West has an idea as to why his marriage is ending: his involvement in politics and decision to run for the presidency.

    On Friday, news broke that West’s wife, reality star Kim Kardashian, had filed for divorce after nearly seven years of marriage.

    While previous reports indicated that there were a handful of factors that led to their split — property, lifestyle and more — politics was also mentioned.

    West, 43, famously threw his name in the ring during the 2020 presidential election, only securing his name on the ballot in 12 states.

    He conceded the longshot election before the race between Donald Trump and Joe Biden was called.

    Following the news of the divorce filing, West has been “texting people” and “talking things through,” an insider told People magazine.

    “He’s in that place of ‘if only,’” the source said. “‘If only I had done this, if only I hadn’t done that.’ He’s processing things.”

    Additionally, the source claimed that the hip-hop star “thinks that the Presidential run was the straw that broke the camel’s back.”

    “Before that, there was hope. After that, none,” the insider further claimed. “It cost him his marriage.”

    In fact, a source previously told Page Six that the campaign was the “final straw” for Kardashian while another source said that she had opposed the idea from the beginning.

    People magazine also learned from a source that while West “isn’t happy” with the divorce, he’s “resigned to reality.”

    “He knew it was coming, but that doesn’t make it any easier,” said the insider. “This is a somber day for him.”

    The divorce is as “amicable as possible,” said the source, noting that “amicable doesn’t mean joyful or ideal.”

    West and Kardashian, 40, are “being adults” about the split. The source also revealed that the rapper is “seeing counselors and advisors to help him through this spot.”

    The information comes not long after a report surfaced that West was “not doing well” ahead of the divorce filing.

    “He is anxious and very sad,” another insider told People. “He knows that the marriage is over, and there’s nothing that can be done right now.”

    They added: “He also knows what he is losing in Kim.”

    The source also said that the “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” star has “defended [West] privately to her family” and “stood beside him at a time where a few wives would have done that.”

    “He is very aware that she has been a good wife. He still loves her very much. But he understands,” said the source, who explained that Kardashian feels “she can’t be married to him anymore.”

    Reps for Kardashian and West did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

    Reported by Fox News

  • Anyim @ 60 – More to Life than Politics, By Ikeddy ISIGUZO

    Anyim @ 60 – More to Life than Politics, By Ikeddy ISIGUZO

    COULD life start at 60 for former Senate President Anyim Pius Anyim? The indications so suggest. For a man who first became a Senator at 37, made Senate President at 39, and voluntarily did not seek re-election to the Senate at 41, Anyim has shown that the tides and waves of life can be turned to one’s advantage at different points on the stretched spectrum that life can be.

    He is re-starting that life with packs of experience. He is a new Anyim rooted in his principles about getting things done.
    Anyim hardly speaks, works behind the scene, and belies the depth and breadth of his grasp of issues with affinity to privacy. He is an unusual politician, one who has shunned the din and dithers of politics for his practice, law.

    He is bereft of the attributes of politics, among them noise, especially when there is nothing to say. Anyim’s silence has often been misconstrued as timidity.

    He opts for salience in speech and pitch, points that are often lost on opponents.

    While many have dwelt on duplicity in contending for a Nigerian President of Igbo origins in 2023, Anyim brought crystal clarity to the issue during his World Igbo Congress lecture at Gregory University, Uturu last December.

    The case was for an Igbo President from the South East, the only zone in the South that had not produced the President. He listed the political and social capitals of South East presidency if the 2023 presidential election were to reflect equity, justice, and the imperatives of building a nation where every part is wielded into place by a sense of belonging.

    In his Uturu lecture, “Identifying the political interest of the Igbos of the South East geo-political zone in Nigeria and strategies for its actualisation”, he narrowed the issues and navigated them to an anchor that stripped every beclouding.

    Pius’ birth on 19 February 1961 did not elicit much excitement. His mother had six other male children who never lived beyond two years. Pius has three sisters. The young Pius was expected to continue the “ogbanje” circle that was held responsible for the earlier deaths. He survived to the delight of his parents.

    In a life fraught with daunting challenges, he missed school sometimes because there was no money to pay his fees, went hungry for most of his school days, hawked bread, worked in a brewery but remembers that the Almighty God was ever present through his mother, elder sister, and other benefactors, especially
    after his father took a fourth wife and left the challenges of fending for the children to each wife.

    His education at Ishiagu High School, Federal School of Arts & Science, Aba, and Imo State University where he read Law, finishing in 1987, left him with a thread of enduring lessons about life.

    The National Youth Service Corps programme, with Directorate for Social Mobilisation, a federal government agency, in its Sokoto office, pointed him to a career in the Civil Service. The National Commission for Refugees, NCR, was his next destination after a stint at the Abuja headquarters of the Directorate for Social Mobilisation. At NCR, he headed the Protection Unit.

    Few noticed Anyim’s first arrival on the political scene by his election under United Nigeria Congress Party, UNCP, to the Senate in 1998. He was just 37! The phase passed with General Sani Abacha’s demise.

    The election strengthened Anyim’s convictions that the Almighty God ordered the ways of humanity once one was attentive to His voice. Unknown, without resources for politics, his victory was at the expense of more experienced politician.

    “I act with the belief that the Almighty God is behind me,” Anyim told a journalist in his remarkable humility which he exhibits in his relationships, not minding the high offices he has held.

    “When I won a senate seat in 1998, God made it possible. I heard His voice clearly asking me to contest,” Anyim states in his biography that is in the works. “He made things possible again in 1999, when I later became Senate President ahead of more known politicians.” Anyim could easily be credited with laying the foundation of the operational structure and frame of the National
    Assembly.

    Anyim has had his political battles. He brushes them aside as collaterals for venturing into politics. He can fight but prefers to speak only when it is necessary.

    He acted in the same way in his most recent tiff with his State Governor Dave Umahi. “His allegations against me were too weighty to be ignored otherwise I would have kept quiet,” he said.
    Away from politics since his departure in 2015 as Secretary to the Government of the Federation under President Goodluck Jonathan, Anyim is reluctant to discuss politics whether of today or tomorrow in any meaningful depth. He retorts that answers to the questions are in his coming book. Again, Anyim discharged the responsibilities of his office as SGF with uncommon patriotism
    and diligence.

    How does the quiet family man feel at 60? Gratitude to the Almighty underlines every answer. From the vagaries of his earlier life, he never knew he would attain the heights he has.

    Will he run for President in 2023? Anyim would give a certain answer when he hears from that clear voice that told him to run in 1998.

    Anyim, you are one of a kind. Congratulations on your birthday.

     

    Isiguzo, a major commentator on minor issues, wrote from Abuja

  • Trump: Leaving world politics worse than he met it, By Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa

     

    PRESIDENT Donald Trump is a joke carried too far. He is a problem child the United States imposed on the universe. There is an African saying that if you give birth to a problem child, it is your responsibility to keep such child in check. Americans formally performed that onerous responsibility this Monday when its Electoral College voted 306-232 for Joe Biden as the incoming American President. In other words, Trump now has less than five weeks to vacate the White House.

     

    Aberrations like Trump litter the landscape of history. Cultured Germany that produced famous philosophers like Georg Hegel, incredible human minds like Karl Marx and matchless cultural icons like Bertolt Brecht, also produced Adolf Hitler. The same France which produced Rene Descartes, Voltaire, Albert Camus, Auguste Comte and Simone de Beauvoir, and gave humanity the inspiring slogan of ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’ was the same that produced mass butchers in countries like Vietnam and Algeria, exterminating people for making similar demands. I am not sure how many people saw the possibility of a racist, tax-dogging, playboy with questionable deals and lack of respect for women, emerging an American President in a highly globalised world.

    As the 2016 primaries progressed, the focus of some in the Republican Party was not winning the elections, but stopping Trump. He was clearly on the rampage accusing Mexicans of being criminals and rapists and Muslims of being Jihadists who: “have no sense of reason or respect for human life.” He campaigned for the legalisation of torture on the international scene and a repeal of Obamacare. He saw women as play objects and spoke of the Democratic Party candidate, Hilary Clinton in sexual terms: “If Hillary Clinton can’t satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?” For him, the media are devils who report falsehood.

    Trump believes he is ordained to win any contest he engages in and in 2016 declared that if he lost to Hilary Clinton, the results would be unacceptable as the elections must have been rigged. This delusion he still manifests by refusing to concede defeat to Biden even after the Electoral College votes. Four years of Trumpism has turned many aspects of world politics upside down and in some instances, reduced America to a laughing stock.

    Imagine a non-scientist who relies on beliefs, declaring in a magisterial manner that Climate Change is a hoax. He eventually withdrew America from the Paris Climate Change Agreement. Trump approached the COVID-19 pandemic in the same cavalier manner even joking that it is a “Chinese Virus.” He discouraged the wearing of masks and encouraged civil resistance against the lockdown programmes of states in the country designed to slow down the rate of infection. This doubtlessly contributed to the American infection rate which as at December 15, 2020 stood at over 16,700,000 with 304,000 COVID-19-related deaths. The highest casualty figures in the world. Unfortunately, he influenced the copycat actions of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro which has seen that country record 737,597 infections and 181,402 deaths.

    Trump also withdrew the US from membership of the World Health Organisation thereby weakening the joint human response to fighting the pandemic. He has also been busy re-drawing the maps of other countries and awarding non-American territories to other countries. For instance, he has recognised illegal Israeli settlements in the seized Syrian Golan Heights. He encouraged, recognised and campaigned for international support in moving the Israeli capital from Tel Aviv to disputed Jerusalem including East Jerusalem which is indigenous to the Palestinians. He has also recognised illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank which even the racist Zionists in Israeli acknowledge as not being Israeli territory. Trump has also been involved in getting some Arab countries to reject the fundamental human rights of Palestinians to a homeland and self-determination by ditching Palestinian rights in favour of being in bed with the racists in Tel Aviv.

    Not satisfied with re-drawing the map of the Middle East, Trump this week decided to redraw the map of Africa by inserting the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic also known as Western Sahara into Morocco. In this, the out-going American President in the manner of colonialists and imperialists, seeks to reduce the member countries of the African Union, AU, from 55 to 54. It is instructive that Western Sahara was admitted into the Organisation of African Unity, OAU in 1982 and is a founding member of the AU.

    As part of its global destabilisation acts, the Trump government had repudiated the multi-national Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action better known as the Iranian Nuclear Deal. It followed this up with more sanctions against Iran including on drugs needed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. To provoke Iran into a war, Trump in January 2020, ordered the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani while on a diplomatic mission in Iraq. He had tried a similar tactic on Syria in 2016 by ordering a missile attack on a Syrian air base. Also, he tried provoking its neighbour, Mexico by declaring it criminal and swearing to build a wall between both countries with the bill going to Mexico. The Igbos of Nigeria say if a madman picks your clothes while you are having a bath in the river and begins to run, it will be unwise to give chase because passers-by would assume both of you are crazy. So those countries wisely ignored the Trump provocations.

    The Trump government has almost pushed the opposition in Venezuela into oblivion first by encouraging it to carry out a coup against elected President Nicolas Maduro. When this failed, it in a quixotic manner, declared then Venezuelan Senate President Juan Guaido as President. When this gambit failed, it encouraged the opposition to boycott the December 6, 2020 parliamentary elections thereby giving the ruling Socialist Party, a clean sweep of the Congress.

     

    Trump makes no distinction between allies and enemies; his government has engaged in trade wars with China just as it has done with its Canadian and European allies. Africans say no matter how bad a person is, he must have positive aspects, so is it with Trump. As President, he has helped to greatly degrade the Islamic State, ISIS which the Obama administration had inadvertently created with its allies in the Gulf. He has pursued dialogue with the Afghanistan Taliban which previous American administrations had striven to present as Islamic terrorists. Trump has also ordered the further reduction of American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq from 4,000 and 3,000 respectively to 2,500 each by January 15, 2021. At its peak in 2007, America had 170,000 troops in Iraq and in 2011, over 50,000 troops in Afghanistan.

     

    On balance, Trump is leaving the world significantly worse off than he met it.

  • Wither Home? Matters Arising – Chris Anyokwu

    Wither Home? Matters Arising – Chris Anyokwu

    By Chris Anyokwu

    Have you ever heard the song: ‘East or West/Home is the best’? Although the short minuscule poem- song appears to scramble the iambic-dactylic metrical pattern the lyrical joyfulness, the mellifluousness of its rhyme scheme more than makes up for such niggling prosodic deviance: ‘west’ and ‘best’ intimate and bracingly approximate rest (read: HOME). But the question to ask is: Whither home? Where is home? The question, without a doubt, sounds nonsensical, given that we all have a place we call home: a hut, a thatched-roof hovel, a mud-house, a face-me-I-slap-you room-let or in a tenement, a house or a well-appointed castle for the upwardly-mobile and well-heeled among us. After all, every Banana Island has its Makoko. Just in case you are not familiar with Lagos metropolis, and, thus do not know where the two diametrically opposed and oceanically-divergent living-spaces are, please ask Google.

    The former is home to Nigeria’s filthy rich class while the latter is a roiling inferno in which Lagos’s disinherited subsist and try to chase after the vanishing illusions of existential meaning. Whither home? To the average villager, his or her village is home as he or she is secure within the reassuring ambiance of the living oral-aural poetry of common speech spoken by all and sundry including the odd settler. Moreover, the festivals, rites of passage (birth, puberty or initiation, nuptial, funeral, inter alia), traditional customs, norms, mores, taboos, etc. add tone and texture to the beauty and utility of home. To be sure, the vital factor of language, the mother tongue, in this connection, cannot be over-emphasized as it constitutes the linchpin of cultural pride for the native son or daughter. By the same token, however, this same linguistic identify can and does give rise to misunderstanding and misunderstanding can and does degenerate into conflict, ranging from mere tantrums and hollow shouting-matches to duels involving fire and fury. For instance, in Ola Rotimi’s The Gods Are Not To Blame, Odewale, the tragic play’s protagonist, commits parricide and regicide on account of the victim mocking his (i.e., Odewale’s) ‘bush’ dialect of the larger Yoruba communicative idiom.

    Thus, even speakers of the same language can and do go to war with one another over mere diacritical and, thus, dialectal variation on the parent tongue. Just think about it: tone or tonality as bone of contention and some members of the homo sapiens duel to the death! Whither home? To the city dweller, the so-called urban drift, the equal- opportunity, zero-sum, winner-takes-all, weitgeist tends to complicate the plot. In point of fact, the lure of lucre and the pursuit of progress drives the individual from place to place, moving and striking camp at will as s/he follows money, as the saying goes. Formerly of the hinterland of primitive innocence, s/he now drifts about in the belly of the beast bedazzled by the legendary gold-dust littering the cobbled byways and paved boulevards of the city.

    Like William Wordsworth’s persona in “Tintern Abbey”, his or her wanderlust is exacerbated by the anonymity of urban life, the alienation and fragmentation of experience, the loneliness and crass self-centeredness of urban dwellers. Thus, the resultant loss of touch with village values in the city, the absorption of foreign ideals and belief-systems, including language, culinary arts, dress code, music and religious practices practically drive him or her to the edge. Now s/he is truly homeless. A fragmented ego, s/he loses all sense of personal identity and self- authenticity. And a split-personality syndrome or crisis of consciousness sets in for this child of a multiple worlds. S/he is remorselessly assailed by the crosswinds of cultural mongrelism, hybridity, mimicry, leading inevitably to psychic vertigo; or, what W.E.B DuBois famously dubbed ‘double consciousness’ in The Soul of Black Folks. This parlous and precarious situation is much worse for the émigré whose soul is riven by contending and irreconcilable allegiances of home and exile.

    The many sweet sorrows of the exilic condition are memorably captured by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in Americanah, a post-colonial novel which poignantly dramatizes the sad and heartrending ways and means our kith and kin in the diaspora rough it out in the face of institutionalized racism, both in the USA and Britain. Perhaps one of the most inspired and touching aspects of the narrative is Adichie’s deployment of Nollywood home video films as alternative simulacra of home away from away. Whither home? There is now an interesting dimension to the emigrant dilemma. Nigerians who have left our shores for greener pastures overseas and are having to raise their kids abroad have resorted ingeniously to importing “natives” from Africa to help teach their mother tongues to their children. This practice is catching on and becoming prevalent in the USA, Canada, the UK and continental Europe. The Yoruba and Igbo in particular deserve praise and commendation on this score, particularly as they have succeeded in mainstreaming their decamillionaire tongues through their official adoption in some school curricula abroad and as the language of broadcast by the BBC. Movingly, the foregoing circumstances bring to mind Sound Sultan’s hit- song “Ajo da b ile” (‘However comfortable exile might be, home is still home’); an ephebe-song that was a large part inspired by Lagbaja’s precursor/master-song, “Afro-calypso”, a lyrical parable that threnodises the unforgettable horrors of the Middle Passage, the roots of the Black Experience and contemporary crisis of Afropessimism.

    Now, let us come back home: where is home for the Nigerian child? Where are the ‘Tales by Moonlight’, the folklore which constitutes the basis of pedagogy and hortatory traditions through which the child’s limbs are earthed in autochthonous values, which in turn act as ballast against wayward winds? How much of the mother tongue [ more on this next week] does the child possess and can utilize with felicitous ease? Who, indeed, shapes his/her outlook on life? Is it the parents? I think not. We all know, in all good conscience, that it is now the peer group, social media, the internet, television, and all what not. The parents, even when conditions are ideal, are nearly always missing in action as both parents trade blame and parry responsibility over whose business it is to cater to the child’s needs, linguistic and all.

    According to Terry Eagleton in his book entitled After Theory, the hearth which traditionally irradiated bonhomie, camaraderie, solidarity, and allied familial values has now been corrupted, swamped as it is by postmodern pathologies and alien malodorous influences spawning caricatures, mongrels and human grotesquerie among cognate monstrosities. The home or hearth is now the zone of zombies! It bears reiterating that home is a place of comfort and security, the infinitely reassuring hearth, cozy and warm with family and friends; a place teeming with memories of the good times and sometimes of the bad. It is rooted in history and tradition and oral lore, protected by time- honored cultural traditions, rites, festivals, and ancestral memory. Home is, in this connection, more than a living-space, a geographical locus or accommodation. It intimates and evokes feelings and values of kinship or consanguinity, affinal fellowship and oneness, of charity and compassion, a one-for-all/all-for-all philosophy. It should, nonetheless, be readily admitted that home has evaporated like fog under the pitiless glare of the so-called post-modern condition.

    Home has changed address from a physical location to a psycho-spiritual one, namely: the human heart. Given the geographic dispersal, the rootlessness and the dislocation of the modern self as homo viator, an existential flaneur or hobo, s/he peregrinates and perambulates with his/her ‘home’ like the tortoise or the snail, seeking watering-holes in this wilderness we call earth. His or her condition is worsened by the most confounding malaise of our post-apocalyptic epoch in which reality is virtuality and vice-versa.

    Now, all is flux: exile can become home and home, when rendered unlivable, turns exile both literally and figuratively. Small wonder, then, today’s Nigeria is a Frankenstein’s laboratory, a Dantesque Inferno, and a Hobbesian Dystopia, no thanks to a snowballing slew of socio-economic and political problems including killer herdsmen terrorism, banditry, rape, kidnapping, armed robbery, and insurgency, thereby transmogrifying our geo-political ecosystem beyond recognition. You have to, from time to time, pinch yourself to reassure yourself that you are still living, nay, surviving in the postcolonial hell-hole called Nigeria. As always, we can only appeal to those whom fortune has made rulers over our collective affairs at all tiers of the social contract and all levels of governance to work conscientiously to make Nigeria great again, especially for the next generation: our children.

    Chris Anyokwu

    Associate Professor of English, University of Lagos.

  • Avoiding a blind debate on the ILO and politics, By Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa

     

    IT was unfair, except for purposes of clarification, elucidation and mass education, for Nigerian human rights lawyer, Femi Aborishade, to engage in a debate on the International Labour Organisation, ILO, and politics with former Deputy President of the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, Promise Adewusi who also incidentally, is a lawyer. This is partly because as far back as 1984/85, Aborishade as the NLC Education Officer was teaching workers and labour leaders about local and international trade unionism, including ILO conventions. Also, he was not an accidental trade unionist, but a conscious one by ideological choice based on his abiding fate in the Working Class.

     

    Adewusi had kicked off the debate on September 28, 2020, with his fallacious arguments that Nigerian trade unions backed down on the general strike and protests against increases in fuel, electricity and taxes because “…what protects and guides labour is the ILO Conventions”, adding: “Sadly, under these Conventions political strikes are illegal and therefore not protected.” Contrary to our lived experiences, Adewusi added the sophistry that only non-trade unions can organise so-called political strikes which “workers can always join as citizens, not as labour”.

     

    Aborisade, amongst other matters had educated Adewusi by pointing out that page 55 of the ILO Committee of Experts states clearly that political strikes, “which seek a solution to major issues in economic and social policy”, are justified. Contrary to Adewusi’s claims, unions do not need the permission or protection of the ILO to embark on any type of strike they want.

     

    The trade unions had been agitating and going on strikes for over a century before the ILO was born in 1919. The May 1886 international strikes that led to the massacre of American workers and the rise of May Day had taken place 33 years before. Famous intellectuals on labour and production like Adam Smith and Karl Marx had long passed away, and the Russian Workers Revolution was two years in the making before the ILO was born. So, how can Adewusi insinuate that the ILO is the policeman of strikes?

     

    In any case, who determines which strikes are ‘political’ which are not? Strike itself, is the political expression of workers agitations against unjust conditions of work and a continuation of industrial relations by other means whether at the workplace or the streets. What strike could be more political than the Polish workers ‘Solidarity’ strike which overthrew the communist system on August 24, 1989? Yet it was supported by the ILO which hailed the Polish trade unionist, Lech Walesa, as a hero.

     

    If the ILO is against politics, why does it invite non-trade union political figures like Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi to address its annual conventions even before they held any political office in their countries? Nigeria’s first outing as an independent country in the ILO was in 1961. There, the delegation tabled a motion for the expulsion of Apartheid South Africa. That country remained expelled until it overturned its political system; was that industrial relations or politics? The ILO has a standing rule that governments which come to power through unconstitutional means would not be allowed into its ranks; is that industrial relations or politics?

     

    So, Adewusi’s claims are an embarrassing ignorance. Electricity is the bedrock of industrialisation, the bloodline of the economy and development. So, if electricity is not connected to employment, what is? Many workers in Nigeria, such as those in Dunlop, lost their jobs due to the inability of their employers to cope with the rising cost of energy, including crazy bills and the cost of generating private power. If that is not related to employment, what is? The high cost of transportation, which is by road, takes a large chunk of the worker’s income, yet this is not connected to employment?

     

    The high cost of food which is partly due to the high cost of transporting farm produce to the urban centres is crippling to the poor worker, yet it is not related to employment? Do the claims of Adewusi suggest that labour leaders are stupid when they make the cost of living the foundation of wage negotiations; or is it political? Does he suggest that all along, the NLC and the Trade Union Congress, TUC, which called strikes over such matters, are ignorant of ILO rules or are violating ILO Conventions? Is Adewusi speaking for labour or the Buhari government?

     

    The ILO has permanent members in its Governing Board like those of the United Nations Security Council. Is that labour relations or global politics? I think part of Adewusi’s lack of knowledge about the ILO might stem from his ignorance on the circumstances and reasons for its birth, and its constitution. The ILO was created by the victors of the First World War under the June 28, 1919, the Versailles Peace Treaty. It was not established for purposes of industrial relations but for universal peace based on social justice. The Preamble of the ILO Constitution states its objectives: “Whereas universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based upon social justice; and whereas conditions of labour exist involving such injustice, hardship and privation to large numbers of people as to produce unrest so great that the peace and harmony of the world are imperilled; and an improvement of those conditions is urgently required; whereas also the failure of any nation to adopt humane conditions of labour is an obstacle in the way of other nations which desire to improve the conditions in their own countries.”

     

    On May 10, 1944, the Declaration of Philadelphia was made an annex to the ILO Constitution. It emphasized the centrality of human rights to social policy and the need for international economic planning. Amongst other issues the Declaration stated that: “Labour is not a commodity” and that “all human beings, irrespective of race, creed or sex, have the right to pursue both their material well-being and their spiritual development in conditions of freedom and dignity, of economic security and equal opportunity“. It also famously declared: “Poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to prosperity everywhere”. In 1946, the ILO was made a specialised agency of the United Nations.

     

    Since the above are the ILO’s stated reasons for its existence, the strikes against unreasonable, punitive and suffocating increases in the prices of fuel, electricity and taxes, which, as envisaged under the ILO Constitution, would lead to “…hardship and privation to large numbers of people” are in order. I am aware of campaigns by parasites at the ILO against the right to strike, but this will fail because the choice of a worker at any given time to work or refuse to work(strike) is a fundamental human right. To argue otherwise is to campaign for forced labour.

  • The king as a heroic-Villain – Hope Eghagha

    By zHope Eghagha

    In classical literature, both Asian and European, and oral African literature, we encounter the concept of a king who becomes a villain or a villain who becomes king through acts of destruction or war or pillage. A typical hero becomes king on account of his personal valour, strength, and courage. He fights and conquers huge challenges in an extraordinary manner. For this reason, he is like Oedipus or Odewale in The Gods are Not to Blame (by Ola Rotimi), made king over his people. Later, in the scheme of things, on account of his deeds or misdeeds, he is rejected by the people and cast away.

    We refer to such characters as Ozidi in the eponymous play Ozidi by JP Clark, Macbeth by Shakespeare, or Okonkwo in Things Fall Apart. By virtue of their position, they are as destructive as they are constructive. In some societies, when the people get tired of the excesses of the heroic-villain, they get rid of him in a ritual manner. This narrative promotes the scapegoat motif, that is, the king or leader becomes the scapegoat that must bear away the ‘sins’ of the community.

    After Oedipus was expelled from the kingdom he once ruled over, he ended up in the wilderness, so to speak. He lived in the mountains awaiting his fate. But he bore the punishment with equanimity knowing the gravity of the offence he had committed against the gods, against humanity. What worse fate can befall a man than to kill his father and marry his mother in ignorance? After plucking out his eyes, he remains blind until he apotheosized elevated to the pantheon of gods!

    Thoughts of scapegoatism came to mind recently as I ruminated over the current situation in Mali. As we now know, President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita was ousted in a military on 18th August 2020 after many months of mass protests by citizens. They were fed up with corruption, with insecurity and the fraudulent nature of governance. Neither sweet words nor threats could deter them from the goal – the resignation of President Keita. The military struck for the second time in ten years. He was promptly arrested by the coup plotters and kept in custody. ECOWAS and other international organizations stepped in. As we write, Keita has not only resigned, a new government has been put in place with the coup leader serving as Vice President to a titular civilian head of government.

    As I reflected over the last governorship elections, I also saw an element of expulsion in the tragedy of former Governor of Edo State Adams Oshiomhole who rose from the lowest point on the ladder to become not only governor but also Chairman of the ruling party in Nigeria. That is no mean feat, considering the number of big egos we have in the party and all the other forces he surmounted to arrive at the top. But his very strength became his undoing. He did not know when to stop. He did not read the handwriting on the wall. He did not listen to the whispers in the dark. He has become another sacrificial lamb for the people to be liberated.

    It was Chinua Achebe who wrote in Things Fall Apart about how the people of Aninta discarded their god because he was no longer useful to them. Can you beat that? Discard a god! The subtext is that if a god can be discarded, who can escape that same fate? Nobody. He was the one who also said that when a man comes to plead with us to allow worship our deity, we should not ask too many questions. A man who must enter his house through another man’s door has a terrible story that he does want anyone to know about.

    What can a kingdom do if the king becomes taboo? To be tabooed means to be an outcast. In sacred societies, a king who sleeps with another man’s wife is taboo. A king who embarks on stealing the ancestral patrimony is taboo. A king who spills the blood of a human without any ritual reason is taboo. A king who commits incest is taboo. Taboo means being unfit to rule. That is, the equivalent of taboo in modern society is incompetence. President Keita became taboo just as the late President Samuel Doe had become taboo in Liberia. An unfit king is more dangerous to the survival of the community, of the people than one thousand armed robbers or kidnappers. Whereas a kidnapper can only kidnap a few people at a time, a dangerous, incompetent king can lead the entire kingdom into perdition.

    The ancient kingdoms which fell were casualties of incompetence or greed and sheer laziness combined with external factors. At a point, the incompetent leader became a common enemy inside whose head the hatchet should be buried. Burying the hatchet comes in different ways. It could mean expulsion. It could mean elimination. It could mean demotion. Traditional societies ensured that dangerous leaders did not remain for too long on the throne.

    In a democracy, the dangerous ruler is removed through the power of the ballot box. We have witnessed the travesty of leadership that is going on in one of the most powerful countries in the world. Elections are a few weeks away. How things will go, we are not gods to tell. He has declared that he may not accept the results of the election if he loses as the polls are suggesting. That is another danger, unknown in the history of that country. Will he be expelled? Will he be led out of the chinaware shop like a raging bull?

    There are many dangerous rulers and political leaders around the world. In Nigeria, we have a fair dose of bad leadership at different levels. Dangerous leaders are a threat to the survival of the polity. Of such men and women, we must beware. Such leaders never realize that the community is bigger than any individual. And any society which allows bad leadership to be perpetually entrenched is a danger to itself. When the bells of annihilation shall be rung in future, there will be nothing to gnash but infant gums in a befuddled manner.

  • #EdoDecides2020: Atiku congratulates Obaseki, says godfatherism over in Nigerian politics

    #EdoDecides2020: Atiku congratulates Obaseki, says godfatherism over in Nigerian politics

    Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar has congratulated Edo State Governor, Godwin Obaseki, on his victory in the governorship election held in the state on Saturday.

    Obaseki , candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), was declared winner of the election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), having polled the highest number of valid votes cast.

    Obaseki polled 307, 955 votes to defeat his closest challenger, Osagie Ize-Iyamu, candidate of the All Progressives Congress(APC), who came second with 223, 619 votes.

    In a statement he personally signed, the presidential flagbearer of the PDP in the 2019 presidential election also commended the people of Edo State for their resilience in the face of the forces arrayed against them, saying the victory of Mr Obaseki ”is not just a victory, but a declaration of Independence from the anti democratic forces of godfatherism and militarism.”

    Read full statement below:

    There is a new dawn in Edo State, and the hard won victory of Governor Godwin Nogheghase Obaseki is not just a victory, but a Declaration of Independence from the anti democratic forces of godfatherism and militarism. No victory could be sweeter than this, and I heartily congratulate the Governor, and the good people of Edo state for their resilience in the face of the forces arrayed against them.

    Edo has a rich history as the centre of Black civilisation, and to this, she is adding a new history as the bastion of Nigerian democracy. This double whammy of ancient and modern glories is a testament to a people who have for centuries set the pace as a beacon of light on the African continent.

    I most heartily congratulate the Peoples Democratic Party, who stood shoulder to shoulder, with the people of Edo and their Government, in good times and bad. We, in the PDP, have shown that we are not fair weather friends to the good people of Edo. In good times, we will walk beside you. In bad times, we will be your true ‘comrade’. We will never be a turncoat. We will never abandon the principles we once espoused, so we can dine with our nemesis. Democracy has no nemesis. And this, the PDP has again proved.

    I look forward to the continuation of four more years of tangible development, and people centred leadership from Governor Obaseki. I also seize this opportunity to thank His Royal Highness, the Oba of Benin, Omo N’oba N’Edo Uku Akpolopkolo, Ewuare II, for the fatherly role he played as a neutral catalyst for peace. That this election was, by and large, free from violence, is a testament of the long and effective shadow he casts over his domain.

    From personal experience, I know Governor Obaseki to be a magnanimous man, and I urge Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu to accept the right hand of fellowship that is likely to be extended to him. The leprous hand he is now holding, can only lead to a destination of barrenness. He is amongst strange bedfellows, and I remind him that no matter how far one has gone on a wrong road, it is never too late to turn back and head in the right direction. The PDP is the right direction.

    And to the good people of Ondo state, my message to you is that freedom from the oppressive grasp of godfathers and external forces that seek to dominate your will, and eviscerate your treasury, is possible. Edo has done it. You can do it too!

    There is a new wind of democratic change now blowing all over Nigeria. The forces of despotism, nepotism, and interlopers cannot successfully withstand this force. Nigeria shall soon be totally free from these forces, from Kaura Namoda, to Lagos. The only power that will stand in Nigeria is people power, not the power of godfathers, or despots.

    May God bless the good people of Edo State and may God bless Nigeria.

  • I cannot venture into politics until Nigeria’s system changes-Davido

    I cannot venture into politics until Nigeria’s system changes-Davido

    Nigerian pop star, Davido, has revealed that there has to be a complete change of Nigeria’s electoral system if he is to venture into politics.

     

    The singer spoke in an interview with Beat FM on Friday, following the end of his short-lived social media hiatus, which led to the release of his single ‘FEM’.

     

    “Before I go into politics, they have to change the whole system. I’m not going to hustle and win the election, be sitting in my office then they will now take me to court and later tell me I did not win,” he said.

     

    Asked about the delay in releasing ‘A Better Time’ album, he said:“I was on tour and had decided to ride on ‘A Good Time’ album until 2021. But I figured out that six of the songs on it had been released before the album,” he said.

     

    ‘Blow my Mind’, ‘Risky’, ‘If’, ‘Fall’, ‘Assurance’ were already out. I didn’t feel like it was a complete brand new album. So immediately I came back from the tour, we just started recording.

     

    “Now, I dropped a song from A Better Time ‘Fem’. It a 17-track album so we’re going to get like 16 new songs. Obviously Nicki Minaj is on it.

     

    “It (A Better Time) will come out before December. I’ve submitted my album. The reason for the delay was that, firstly, I wanted to go away. I didn’t want to drop an album in heat of the crisis.

     

    “Then we were still confused. I wanted time to really figure out. But now people know how to move. If I had dropped in July, I won’t be in the studios granting interviews.

     

    “Also, I wanted it close to Christmas. Another thing is that on the album cover is my son. His birthday is in October. At the party, I want to be able to show him. I had to consider that as well.”