Tag: Restructuring

  • Restructuring: Nigeria will breakup, if Buhari-led govt keeps acting like Egyptian’s Pharaoh – Southern, M/Belt Leaders

    Restructuring: Nigeria will breakup, if Buhari-led govt keeps acting like Egyptian’s Pharaoh – Southern, M/Belt Leaders

    Elder statesmen from four of the six geo-political zones of the country, under the aegis of Southern and Middle Belt Leaders Forum have lambasted President Muhammadu Buhari’s standpoint on the restructuring of Nigeria, stressing that he (Buhari) is acting like Egyptian’s Pharaoh.

    In a signed statement issued on Monday by the leaders of the Middle- Belt, Ndi- Igbo( Ohaneaze, Pan Niger Delta Forum, PANDEF, South- South and Afenifere, described the statement from the Presidency on restructuring as uncouth and rude warning.

    According to the leaders, President Buhari must restructure now and withdraw from what they described as the path of implosion forewarned by patriots at home and abroad.

    The statement signed by Yinka Odumakin for South West; Chief Guy Ikokwu for South East; Senator Bassey Henshaw for South South and Dr. Isuwa Dogo for Middle Belt, the Southern and Middle Belt Leaders Forum particularly criticised the government on the warning issued by the Senior Special Assistant, Media to the President, Garba Shehu against patriotic organizations and responsible individuals like the respected Pastor Enoch A. Adeboye that this government should restructure the country to avert a break – up was uncalled for and unacceptable.

    The statement read, “The attention of Southern and Middle Belt Leaders has been drawn to the very uncouth and rude warning issued by Garba Shehu against patriotic organizations and responsible individuals like the respected Pastor E A Adeboye that this government should restructure the country to avert a break – up.

    “Sounding like spokesman of Pharaoh in Ancient Egypt Garba dismissed the recurring agitations as unpatriotic outbursts. ”The Presidency responds to the recurring threats to the corporate existence of the country with factions giving specific timelines for the President to do one thing or another or else, in their language, “the nation will break up.

    ”This is to warn that such unpatriotic outbursts are unhelpful and unwarranted as this government will not succumb to threats and take any decision out of pressure at a time when the nation’s full attention is needed to deal with the security challenges facing it at a time of the Covid-19 health crisis.

    ”Repeat: this administration will not take any decision against the interests of 200 million Nigerians, who are the President’s first responsibility under the constitution, out of fear or threats especially in this hour of health crisis”

    “We are perturbed that instead of giving assurances about rebuilding the country towards inclusivity, the regime is talking down on Nigeria in very intemperate language.

    “We want to make it clear to the regime that it cannot cow us by using cantonment approach to national issues. We will not accept turning us to second class citizens on our land not even with threats of arrests or assassinations.

    “Should we be clapping for the government and not talk when the Customs appoints 8 Deputy Comptrollers from a section of the country? Are we expected to be saying well done when DSS recruits 535 cadets from Northwest and North East and only 93 from the entire South and Noth Central?

    “Are we to keep quiet when the law setting up PENCOM was clear on succession at Directors level, you go and bring somebody from North East to replace a South East eased out DG?

    “If Garba Shehu is not lexically challenged, he should know that those calling for restructuring are more patriotic than those running Nigeria towards implosion , Patriotism is to corporate Nigeria for all and not the sectional idea of Nigeria by the nepotists.

    “We will not succumb to their narrow idea of Nigeria fully assured that this too shall come to pass. “Therefore, let us restructure now and withdraw from the path of implosion forewarned by patriots at home and abroad.”

  • Towards Restructuring Nigeria (1), By Sonnie Ekwowusi

    Towards Restructuring Nigeria (1), By Sonnie Ekwowusi

    By Sonnie Ekwowusi

    Last week, the Senate Ad-Hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, which has commenced the process of further amendment to the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), formally requested the general public , Executive and Judicial bodies, Civil Society and others to submit memoranda for further amendment on the following subject matters of the Constitution- gender equality; federal structure and power devolution; Local Government/Local Government Autonomy; Public Revenue; Fiscal Federation; Public Revenue/Fiscal Federal and Revenue Allocation; Nigeria Police and Nigerian Security Architecture; Comprehensive Judicial Reforms; Electoral Reforms; Socio-Economic and cultural rights; Strengthening the Independence of oversight institutions and agencies; Residency and Indigene problem; Immunity; The National Assembly; State Creation and other matters capable of promoting good governance in Nigeria.

    Undoubtedly the aforesaid constitutional amendment if pursued with probity, earnestness and sincerity of purpose, hopefully and prayerfully, might assuage the hunger for actualization of the sovereignty of Biafra, dampen the quest for Oduduwa Republic and other secessionist clamours. Politics apart, restructuring of the Nigerian federation is overdue. The fact remains that the deep-seated political, economic, social and cultural imbalances plaguing the Nigerian enterprise right from Nigeria’s independence in 1960 or even before have engaged the attention of both successive Nigerian governments and the Nigerian people. For example, all the Constitutional Conferences that were held in Nigeria, from the 1957 Conference, 1994/1995 Constitutional Conference, 2005 National Political Reform, 214 Constitutional Conference to the Oputa Panel Report (which unfortunately is yet released to the public let alone implemented ) were all geared towards addressing and remedying these imbalances in the Nigerian federation. It is apposite to affirm that the Nigerian crises are crises of failed federalism. Historically, the 1914 amalgamation wrought by the British was to further accentuate her selfish interests in the colony. The amalgamation was a potpourri or assemblage of irreconcilable ethno-religiously and culturally diverse native kingdoms and nationalities. That was why the concocted amalgamation failed on arrival. It was a forced marriage that was, at the outset, bound to wobble. Owing to the clear absence of espirit de corps and cohesion amongst the nationalities which were forcefully amalgamated, Chief Obafemi Awolowo had referred to Nigeria as a “mere geographical expression”. With all the natural resources and minerals at the disposal of different regions at independence everything was working well for Nigeria. But it was short-lived. Under the pretext that it was a corrective and cleansing regime, the military (during the military interregnum) perpetuated indescribable atrocities in Nigeria. Apart from institutionalizing official corruption in Nigeria, the military destroyed the hitherto viable national institutions and systems in Nigeria especially the educational system. The current 1999 Constitution (which is substantially similar to 1979 Constitution) is General Abdulsalam Abubakar’s military Constitution not the much-vaunted people’s Constitution. It is not autochthonous Constitution. No inputs from the people who are supposed to be the sovereign in presidential democracy.

    Simply put, the 1999 Constitution is an inconvenient inequitable constitutional contraption being used to perpetuate injustices in Nigeria. The Constitution over-concentrates enormous power (as could be gleaned from the long list of federal powers in the Exclusive List of the Constitution) in the hands of the Federal government thus leaving the Federating units at the mercy of the Federal government or as appendages to the Federal government.

    This is the main reason for the consistent clamour for a people’s Constitution and, by extension the restructuring of Nigeria. You will recall that in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/367/2007, Chief Anthony Enahoro, Prof Wole Soyinka, Ikemba Odimegwu Chukwuemeka Ojukwu. Chief Ralph Uwazurike, Yerima Shetima and others had dragged the Federal government to the Federal High Court in 2007 to, inter alia, challenge the legitimacy of the 1999 Constitution. In fact, one of the declarations being sought by the plaintiffs in the aforesaid suit is that the following words, “We the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria…do hereby make, enact and give to ourselves the following Constitution” is a big lie because there was no time the Nigerian people met either directly or indirectly to enact for themselves the people’s Constitution. Recently, eminent socio-cultural leaders from south-South, South-East and middle-belt represented by Chief E. K Clarke, Chief Rueben Fasoranti, Dr. John Nwodo and others, have, in suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/595/2020, equally dragged President Buhari to the Federal High Court claiming, inter alia, the sum of N50 billion over marginalization of the people of the region in the appointments to security, quasi-security agencies and strategic agencies of government. Why this suit? Because President Buhari’s political appointments are skewed in favour of the North. And President Buhari unabashedly says that nobody should begrudge him for doing that because he is giving 95% to those who voted for him. Is this not a hate speech?. Of course, it is. How can a President of the whole country single out a section of the country for marginalization and punishment on the allegation that they did not vote for him at the last elections?. Of the 14 current heads of security agencies in Nigeria, 11 are from the North, 2 from South-West, 1 Chief of Naval Staff from the South-South, none from the South-East. Is this not marginalization per excellence? Of course, it is. The nauseating aspect is that when some youths from the same marginalized South-East organize a peaceful gathering, armed soldiers are dispatched to kill them as occurred at Emene, Enugu last week. Mind you, the Emene killing of unarmed civilians is not the first of its kind. On February 9, 2016 the Nigerian soldiers shot and killed countless unarmed pro-Biafra civilians who were peacefully holding prayers inside the football field of Ngwa High School, Aba in Abia State. The photographs of the murdered victims were circulating on whatsApp at a time. Then on May 30 2016, over 30 Igbo civilians were killed and many injured by the military after the several clashes involving the military, police and members of IPOB and MASSOB at Nkpor-Agu, Niger Bridge, Onitsha and Asaba respectively. The question begging for an answer is: why shoot and kill defenceless civilians holding peaceful prayer or meeting or rally?. The paradox is that the same soldiers and security agents who would not dare arrest the murderous Fulani herdsmen let alone open fire on them would readily turn round to open fire and kill unarmed civilians.

    This is why Nigeria must be restructured. If you don’t want Biafra, Oduduwa Republic, Mid-West and so forth, do the right thing: eliminate nepotism and provincialism that breed secessionist and separatist agitations. Stop killing unarmed civilians. Correct the lop-sided political appointments. Allow the citizens to exercise their right to freedom of religion. Appoint competent technocrats to run the government irrespective of their tribes and tongues. Let commutative justice reign.

  • Nigeria already being restructured-APC

    Nigeria already being restructured-APC

    The All Progressives Congress has said contrary to reservations in some quarters about its commitment to fulfilling its campaign promise of restructuring the country, steps so far taken by the President, Muhammadu Buhari towards the execution the report of 2014 National Conference and the report of the Nasir El-Rufai-led APC committee on true federalism was enough evidence that restructuring has begun.

    This was contained in the September edition of the in-house monthly publication of the APC, The Progressives. The piece was titled, ‘Calm Down! Restructuring has begun’ and the e-copy of the magazine was accessed on Monday.

    According to the party successive administrations had wasted billions of taxpayers’ money to hold national conferences with the reports and recommendations of such conferences not implemented.

    The magazine said unlike preceding attempts which yielded little or nothing, Buhari has taken steps to implement part of the recommendations of the 2014 National Conference as well as those of the 2017 Governor Nasir El-Rufai-chaired APC committee on True Federalism, which came out with far-reaching recommendations.

    It said President Buhari has implemented recommendations including poverty reduction and social inclusion as well as economic diversification.

     

  • Yoruba Summit Group spits fire: Any attempt to conduct 2023 polls without restructuring will spell doom for Nigeria

    Yoruba Summit Group spits fire: Any attempt to conduct 2023 polls without restructuring will spell doom for Nigeria

    Prominent Yoruba leaders have threatened to boycott the 2023 elections unless the country restructures. The leaders also decried the state of the nation, saying, “The ship of state is veering off precariously into a precipice, and that Nigeria is at the very edge of a political subsidence.”

    This was contained in the communiqué issued at the end of the meeting of the Yoruba Summit Group. Yoruba leaders including Afenifere leader, Pa Reuben Fashoranti, Pa Ayo Adebanjo, President, Yoruba World Congress, Prof. Banji Akintoye, Aare Onakakanfo, Gani Adams, former Ondo Governor, Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, Dr. Tokunbo Awolowo-Dosunmu, among others participated in the meeting.

    In the communiqué signed by Mogaji Gboyega Adejumo, the leaders said, “We are persuaded that nothing short of restructuring can save this country. Any attempt to go ahead with elections in 2023 without addressing the issue of restructuring would spell doom for Nigeria.”

    The group aslo decried the lopsided appointment in the country and the state of insecurity. The communiqué said: “The emerging resolve of the Yorubas not to be part of vassal state that Nigeria has become, is better managed with due accommodation before any further degeneration and obvious consequences.

    “Our quest shall henceforth be to mobilise the masses of our peoples not to participate in any further elections until the goal of Restructuring or Self-determination is attained.

    “Notwithstanding the interests of some elements in our midst, It would be presumptuous to assume that the masses of the educated Yoruba Nation will dive headlong into being part of the 2023 elections, when all elements of its execution – the Military, Paramilitary, INEC, the Judiciary have been rigged and appropriated by a single very tiny minority Ethnic Group in a small corner of the country.”

    The leaders called the Muhammadu Buhari administration to take “confidence building steps” ahead of the 60th Anniversary of Nigeria as an independent Nation on October 1, 2020. “Steps towards an urgent meeting of all nationalities have to be taken now to determine the nature of our relationships.

    “Unless this peaceful step is heeded to, so that Nigeria heads in the right direction thereafter, the clear alternative would be for self-determination quests to proceed rapidly without any further restraint. “It has become patently untenable for the Yoruba Nation to tolerate further incompetence and impunity as has been foisted on all other ethnic nationalities across Nigeria.”

  • As Obasanjo Speaks on restructuring the Nigerian security architecture: Will Buhari come out of the Fulani enclave to do something positively for the sake of himself and Katsina State? – Godwin Etakibuebu

    As Obasanjo Speaks on restructuring the Nigerian security architecture: Will Buhari come out of the Fulani enclave to do something positively for the sake of himself and Katsina State? – Godwin Etakibuebu

    By Godwin Etakibuebu

    Before former President Olusegun Obasanjo spoke last week Friday, June 26, 2020, in Abeokuta – Ogun State, on reorganization of security architecture in Nigeria, in a lecture titled “COVID-19 and Nigeria security Issues: The Way Forward”, all Nigerians are fully aware, without any iota of doubt, that security of lives and properties had become a non-existent matter in our beloved country.

    Yet, the man spoke with his typical style; a style that is peculiarly Obasanjo – the Enigma and Philomena, who would never call a spade by another name, except what it is – spade. Dealing on that topic of security restructuring [or reorganization – the exact word he used] in Nigeria; a topic he discusses with ease, given his antecedents in that field, he spoke to President Muhammadu Buhari, more in advisory role than rebuking. The canon of what he suggested to President Buhari to do fell within two factors of suggestions.

    The first point he made, and this is as crucial as the second one, was his invitation to all Nigerians to see themselves as stakeholders in prosecution of security in the country. He made it very clear that security for one in a part of the country is security for all elsewhere within the geographical terrain of Nigeria. The old man beckoned to all – young or old, male or female, rural or urban dweller, high or low, to come together in savaging the country from the journey of flow of ruin it [the country] has embarked upon. Look at how the old man from Egba in Abeokuta put it.

    “Wherever there is insecurity in Nigeria, it must be of concern to all of us. It should not be the attitude of ‘am alright Jack’ or ‘it serves them right’. I believe it should be ‘we are all in one bad boat and we must put all hands on deck to fix it’. Maybe now that we are all feeling the pinch, the collective fixing will be understood and be easy to accomplish”, Obasanjo said. “I will not hesitate to say that in this statement, Arewa message, spoke the minds and made presentation on behalf of majority of right-thinking Nigerians and not Northern Nigerians alone. We are all bothered and burdened”. This call is very crucial if we must survive this perilous time.

    Then he moved to the very coordinate clarion call, and this he directed to President Buhari; a man that can better be described as his junior in everything, either in the Military or Political setting. And it is on this second point that the “reorganization of security architecture in Nigeria” was brought to the front burner by the former President – Olusegun Obasanjo.

    This needful critical assignment is pushed on President Muhammadu Buhari’s shoulder squarely, for the obvious reason that it is only him that can do it, as he is the Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces, who appoints his security chiefs discretionally. And only him can deploy them, instruct them, rebuke them, query them, redeploy them, discipline them, determine their appointments and even dismiss them from services. This is solely his responsibility as the C-in-C.

    This is what the retired senior Military Four Star General told his retired junior Military Two Star General.

    ”Federal security architecture as organised and operated by the present government cannot give any individual or group hope, let alone assurance of security within Nigeria”. “Our destiny is in our own hands. In reform and restructuring, security architecture, structure and arrangement must devolve more security responsibility on the community, local and state authorities”. “Unfortunately, I have recently observed from some writers on the security situation in the North, the feeling or attitude of ‘it serves them right’. We must not gloat at the difficulties or misfortune of others, rather we must emphathise”.

    The language coined out and used here by the former president while addressing the incumbent president, was more of military terminology, that might not give us [bloody civilian – isn’t that what the “bloody” military boys call us?] thorough meaning except you want to peep into their [Military] world of political intrigues.

    Let us take his remark, printed boldly above, into proper interrogation so as to ascertain what the man [Obasanjo] has said. “Unfortunately, I have recently observed from some writers on the security situation in the North, the feeling or attitude of ‘it serves them right’.

    What was that thing that made some writers, commentators, observers or even those the late Chief Bola Ige; the assassinated Attorney General of the Federation and Minister for Justice [the erudite legal luminary popularly referred to as Esa-Oke Cicero] called sit-down-look audience, have the feeling of “it serves them right”, whenever they contemplated on the security situation in the North? This was Obasanjo’s submission, which can rightfully be seen as bombshell, though not packaged and delivered in that format. Here is the cruise of the matter.

    President Muhammadu Buhari took oath of office to defend and protect us – first was in May, 2015. He swore on oath with the Nigerian Constitution to do exactly this. And Nigerians hopefully, believing him, waited on him to do what he swore on oath to do. He set the ball rolling by appointing, amongst others, his service chiefs and deployed them for the assignments ahead, albeit securing and defending Nigerians and their properties.

    But, on a closer look, some Nigerians were not comfortable with the appointments, specifically on those fully responsible for the security architecture of Nigeria. It was lopsided or leaning too much to one tribe and religion. This was Hausa/Fulani/Moslem. Some may want to correct me at this point by referring to office of the Chief of Defense Staff and that of the Chief of Naval Staff. Let us try not to be distracted by these “minority inclusion”, as they are what I have adequately dealt with in my incoming book – IN NIGERIA, THE VULTURE AND VIMPIRE ARE STILL FEEDING.

    It was this exposition on recruitment of “security architecture” that created a Club of some silent but critical minds, which former President Obasanjo now referred to as “some writers on the security situation in the North, the feeling or attitude of ‘it serves them right’”. President Muhammadu Buhari maintained this line of thought throughout his first Four Years tenure, neither is he revising the modus operandi of erecting the “security architecture” around the same people, in his second tenure, as all of us witness currently.

    What this action of the president translates to is that unless one is from a particular religion, and of a particular geopolitical zone of the country, such person may not be competent enough to handle matters of security for Nigeria, it doesn’t matter the pedigree of such person on security issues.

    The most unfortunate and ironic evidential outcome [result] of President Buhari’s action, along the line of this discussion, remains nothing but continuous escalation of deeper hostility from anti-security elements of the Nigerian Society. And come to look at it this way. From Boko Haram [which was predominant when he was sworn into office in 2015], the increase in Banditry, Insurgency, Rustling, Kidnapping and other forms of criminality [which has almost brought ruin to the whole of the North/West, and path of North Central geopolitical zones, speak of “error of judgment on those recruited to build a security architecture” of bringing peace to Nigeria.

    That is on one hand. And on the other hand is a greater disaster, challenging Mr President’s choice of those he deemed fit for driving security architecture of eradicating, or reducing to the minimum, insecurity from Nigeria generally and the far North particularly. Let us have a look at the greater danger first, before drawing the curtain on this exercise.

    This danger was excellently escalated, interrogated and captured by my dear brother [though we have never met]; Segun Adeniyi – that prolific writer and Editorial Board Chairman of Thisday Newspaper, in his article, titled KATSINA: A STATE UNDER THE GUN!, brilliantly rendered in his column, in Thisday Newspaper of June 25, 2020. In gathering material for the said column, Segun gave details of sojourning in the North, particularly Katsina State and some other places of hostility in that geopolitical zones. He [Segun Adeniyi] interviewed the Emir of Katsina and this is what the latter had to say.

    My simple question seemed to have thrown the Emir of Katsina, His Royal Highness, Dr Abdulmumini Kabir Usman, off balance. After a brief pause, he countered: “You are asking me how I feel when my people are being killed every day? We can spend a whole day discussing that. We are dealing with murderers, people for whom lives mean nothing but they seem to have overwhelmed the capacity of the state.” He explained the nature of the challenge, the historical decision that disempowered the traditional authority and in the process emboldened criminals within their domains, and added, “When the former Agriculture Minister, Mr Audu Ogbeh visited me last year with the CBN Governor, (Mr Godwin Emefiele) and they gave me some cotton seedlings, I asked what they wanted me to do with them. I told them what I needed from the federal government is protection for my people, most of who in any case have been forced to abandon their farms.”

    “As the emir spoke, his pain was palpable. His encounter with Ogbeh and Emefiele occurred on 6th May last year and was lavishly reported in the media. The duo had visited Katsina State to launch the distribution of cotton seeds/inputs to farmers for the 2019 planting season. In the course of their courtesy call to the palace, the Emir had said: “Hon. minister, tell the president that we have to take very good care of our people’s security first. All these programmes, as good as they are, cannot be without security. Every day I receive reports of kidnappings and killings from district and village heads. I have not seen this kind of country; how do we live like animals? Three days ago, Magajin Gari (of Daura Emirate Council) was abducted. Nobody is safe now, whether in your house or on the road or wherever you are. Many people have abandoned their farms in fear of kidnapping and killings and other atrocities. It’s very unfortunate.”

    Segun Adeniyi drove the same question round the North and his conclusion on the elusive peace in most part of the whole North presently, pointed to one fact, to wit: “a route that was never taken by President Muhammadu Buhari in erecting a Security Architecture”.

    The Bandits, Cattle Rustlers and all other mayhem predators in the North, that have torn Zamfara, Sokoto, Kaduna, Katsina and Niger States into shreds today, are, to a larger percentage, Fulani origin. Of particular jeopardy was the Home-State of Mr President – Katsina State, where the Emir [of Katsina]’s quoted lamentation above serves all the details we may want to know.

    It must have been for this reason that those genuine protesters from the North a few days ago, who began their protest in Katsina before moving same to Abuja, where President Buhari’s security apparatus made the mistake of arresting these genuine protesters.

    On that protests and arrests, we heard more than enough from some Northern Elders, who are also Fulani. Tofa, a most respected full blooded Fulani, by all ethological interpretations, spoke a warning language directly to President Buhari, and cautioned him to release the leader of the protesters or “what happened in 2011 would be a child’s play”. Add the voice of Ango Abdullahi; the erudite leader of the Arewa Elders Forum and former Vice Chancellor of the prestigious Ahmadu Bello University to the cry coming from the North, you will understand the fact that the bubble is bursting from the President’s home front.

    It is no longer at ease with both President Muhammadu Buhari and the Security Architecture he built. The more he wants to retain his security architecture, which he built around the same people he believes can do the job – the Hausa/Fulani/Moslem, the more he incurs the anger of all other Hausa-Fulani-Moslems [the majority] across the whole North. And this is Buhari’s actual predicament. And this is the simple translation of former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s narration. And this is what the Nigerian people are saying.

    This leaves Muhammadu Buhari with one terrible decision to make. There is a book named “THE HARD WAY IS THE ONLY WAY”, which was translated into a film in the early 80s. The President might need to read this book before doing the needful that he needs to do most urgently. The needful expected of President Buhari is simple. But, will he be willing to do it?

    Will President Muhammadu Buhari be willing to dismantle this octopus and nebulously packaged Security Architecture; a structure built on the deceit table of “only mine is the best for a more enduring Structure of inclusion”? Will he be able to step out of this Fulani enclave and step into a more inclusive Security Structure that will make life safe for all, the Fulani inclusive?

    It is only President Muhammadu Buhari that can answer the question, even as l wished him well on this journey, which the late Dr Tai Solarin called a torturous journey.

    Godwin Etakibuebu; a veteran Journalist, wrote from Lagos.

    Contact:

    www.godwintheguru.com

    Twitter: @godwin_buebu

    Facebook: Godwin Etakibuebu

    Facebook Page: Veteran Column

    Phone: +234-906-887-0014 – short messages only.

    You can also listen to this author [Godwin Etakibuebu] every Monday; 9:30 – 11am on Lagos Talk 91.3 FM live, in a weekly review of topical issues, presented by The News Guru [TNG].

  • Obasanjo: A belated love affair – Azu Ishiekwene

    Azu Ishiekwene

    If words could make the dead turn in their grave, the founder of the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC), Dr. Frederick Faseun, would have rolled over last week, caught between amusement and surprise at a remarkable statement during the first anniversary lecture of his passing.

    On that occasion, former President Olusegun Obasanjo warned that the country risked another civil war if President Muhammadu Buhari’s government continued to ignore the demands for restructuring. That statement, its timing and place were extraordinary.

    Faseun would be amused that it took Obasanjo 20 years to get to this point, and at the same time surprised that the man he once publicly accused of betraying the cause, has now received the gift of hindsight and was personally present at his memorial lecture to honour him with this gift.

    Restructuring – or true federalism, as it was once called – has many enemies and Faseun died believing that Obasanjo was one of the strong enemies. It wasn’t just what Faseun believed; more important was what Obasanjo did to OPC or anyone remotely connected with the call to restructure the country.

    The rise of OPC, the call for a sovereign national conference/true federalism, predated Obasanjo’s second coming. Yet Obasanjo, who perhaps had the greatest opportunity to strengthen the foundation of restructuring, and who in fact profited from it in some way, did more than any president after him to attack and undermine the idea. But what is hindsight, if not the chance to eat humble pie without shame or regret?

    I didn’t know the day will come when Obasanjo would be in Faseun’s corner. But there he was, defending him with a vigour and tenacity that would have left the first-class surgeon and acupuncture specialist shaking his head in disbelief.

    When Faseun started OPC in the early 1990s, there were many genuine concerns about the direction of what appeared at the time to be the emergence of a wild pseudo-military wing of Yoruba political resistance following the annulment of the June 12 election.

    But Faseun did his best to curb the excesses of the group (before it splintered), as did a number of the Yoruba political elite who argued, justifiably, that the politics of exclusion was worsening the level insecurity in the country and leaving large sections of the country and millions of young people in despair.

    Initially, it appeared that Obasanjo’s government would listen and take steps to address the genuine grievances. But that didn’t happen. Instead, Obasanjo demonised those who expressed the view that his government had been captured by those who installed him. He called the opposition names and rejected any suggestions of a sovereign conference or the prospects of true federalism.

    While he bluffed his political enemies or treated them with contempt and indifference for demanding true federalism, he reserved an iron fist for the OPC – the same OPC whose leader he was full of praise for last week.

    Obasanjo personally ordered the police to shoot OPC members on sight, brushing aside calls for restraint by Human Rights Watch at the time. At a point, the late human rights activist and one of Faseun’s strongest allies, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, was genuinely worried that Obasanjo’s government would eliminate Faseun.

    In an interview with The Niche before he died, Faseun spoke about the pain of Obasanjo’s betrayal as if it happened yesterday: “Former President Olusegun Obasanjo was one of the factors that made the OPC come into existence.

    “We fought for him, fought for his regime and he ruled this nation for eight years of the constitutional prescription. It was surprising that the same Obasanjo that we protected was the one that said if you see any OPC member, shoot on sight.”

    Faseun’s OPC was not the only victim of Obasanjo’s betrayal. The former president sussed out and attacked the Alliance for Democracy (AD), perhaps the most organised political expression of the will to restructure the country at the time.

    Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu and a remnant in Lagos were the only survivors in the South west. The former president crushed dissent in his government, regularly purging his party rank and file of contrary voices, and whipping the National Assembly in line.

    In a spectacular travesty of federalism, he declared emergency rule in Ekiti and Plateau states and suspended the houses of assembly. On top of that, he instigated a few state houses of assembly to remove governors he didn’t particularly like. Under Obasanjo, the country descended into insecurity that left a trail of violent killings, including the murder, without recompense, of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Bola Ige.

    In spite of the spiraling violence on his watch and suggestions that a decentralised police could stem the tide, Obasanjo stonewalled. The same man who is rooting for Amotekun today, describing it as the best invention since the Royal Niger Company’s constabulary force, would not even brook community police when he was in power.

    It was Ok, he seemed to say, for Abuja to use the Federal police to rig elections or intimidate its enemies in the states, but wrong for states to have any security arrangement with sufficient local knowledge to protect their own communities.

    His most memorable token to the call for true federalism was a national political reform conference set up on the eve of his departure and whose report he later dumped among the chickenfeed in his farm.

    But listening to Obasanjo last week, it’s obvious that all things have become new. Amotekun – the regional policing arrangement by the South west – is suddenly a brilliant idea, not in and of itself, but because one of the governors has offered to give the former president special attention in all discussions regarding the formation of the security network. In order words, it’s not about Amotekun, but Obasanjo being Obasanjo, it’s about Obasanjo.

    Which is fine. We’re all entitled to the gift of hindsight. If you have led your country not once but twice, and even attempted a third, after which you have remained the busiest former president at 83, and you still can’t shame others with your ego and gift of hindsight, then it’s your fault.

    We now know that Obasanjo never opposed true federalism, fiscal federalism, restructuring or whatever baptismal name you choose for it. On the contrary, he said he supported any political tampering that could prevent another civil war but only did not have a name for it!

    Yet, Buhari would do well to leave the messenger and face the message. In spite of his best efforts, the country is still in trouble. It is still deeply divided along tribal and religious lines. Widespread feelings of alienation and discontent continue to rise, and current structures are woefully inadequate to contain them.

    Change is a moving train. Over the years, states (especially Lagos), have through litigation, managed to wrest from the centre some areas of control, such as land, certain taxes and levies, legislation on sports and lottery, and control of physical planning, among others.

    But as human rights activist and senior advocate Femi Falana pointed out, the items on the Exclusive List have been expanded from 45 in the 1963 constitution to 67 in the current one.

    The irony, however, is that while states are demanding greater autonomy and castigating the centre for appropriating 52 per cent of federal revenue, these same states insist on treating local governments just as cruelly as they are being treated by the centre.

    President Buhari appears uncomfortable with any suggestions of restructuring partly because he belongs to the era that imposed a unitary system on Nigeria, and also partly because he is suspicious that it is a nebulous agenda for mayhem.

    But he’s wrong. Necessity, especially economic necessity, is already driving the restructuring that Buhari’s party promised but which it has so far failed to deliver on.

    Obasanjo’s latter-day love affair with restructuring should be a parable to those who resist change simply because they think they have a temporary advantage.

    If Faseun could give a vote of thanks to Obasanjo at the memorial lecture last week, he would have been delighted that the former president has, finally, seen the light. But then, he might have added in his forthright manner, that even hindsight has its expiry date.

    Ishiekwene is the MD/Editor-In-Chief of The Interview

  • Restructuring: Take your agitation to NASS, Presidency tells Nigerians

    The Presidency has asked Nigerians agitating for the restructuring of the country to take advantage of the constitutional amendment being proposed by the National Assembly to put forward their case for restructuring.

    Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu who spoke at a media parley with House of Representatives Correspondents said only the National Assembly has the constitutional power to restructure the country.

    Shehu however said that President Muhammadu Buhari was committed to restructuring the country as contained in the APC manifesto, but will never side track the National Assembly.

    The Presidency is however not on the same page with many Nigerians and some members of the House of Representatives on the necessity of the bill currently before the Senate aimed at regulating the social media which reportedly proscribed death penalty for hate speech.

    He said any restructuring done outside the parliament will be against the spirit and letters of the constitution, adding that only the parliament can successfully carry out such an exercise.

    He said: “we in the APC are committed to restructuring. Read the manifesto of the APC. It is stated there and so, we are not running away from it. President Buhari is ready to restructure the country.

    “The problem we have with a lot of the proponents of restructuring is that they are looking for the fastest way to that restructuring. They don’t want to use the parliament. They want to use extra constitutional bodies and that is untidy. If you are a democrat, you abide by the processes.

    “The parliament is the institution of government working with the executive and the judiciary. For you to say no, you want to do a congress at Yaba market square and debate, do you want to cause a fight.

    “We must be organised and follow due process. If you have a case on restructuring, come to the parliament. In any case, the Senate President has announced that this 9th parliament will start constitutional amendment in January. So, bring your issue. These are intelligent people voted for by the people.

    “Those who shout restructuring saying they want a parallel body to-do that, we have said to them that they are wrong. The sovereignty of the people resides with the parliament and so, if you want to restructure the country, come to the parliament.
    “If you dont have confidence in the parliamentarians you have voted for, wait for four years and vote them out and choose another set of people. But you cannot circumvent the role of the parliament in a democracy and it is key to what ever restructuring you want.”

    Speaking on the social media bill, the Presidential spokesman blamed the media for what he called unnecessary controversy surrounding the intention behind the bill, adding that death penalty is not the only thing contained in the bill.

    He said there was the need for Nigerians to have a law that will regulate social media and impose punishment for violators, adding that a situation where people post fake news that leads to the death of fellow Nigerians should not be accepted.

    He said: “It is your responsibility as the media to help the Nigerian government on the issue of hate speech before the parliament. The Minister of Information who speaks for the Nigerian government has spoken of the necessity of a law to govern social media.

    “I am being careful on what he wants to do because I think there are parallel processes going on. I also blame the media for creating unnecessary controversy. If you look at the law being discussed, the media has focused more on the death penalty for fake news.

    “You have a responsibility of studying that bill. Only a few days ago, the American Ambassador met the sponsor of that bill and at the end, he said Nigerians should have a rethink. It is your duty to reap it open and tell Nigerians what it contained. The bill is not all about death penalty or free speech.

    “For example, is there a content in that bill that prevent a social media harm? See what the British media is doing for example and the social media is being held accountable for what is called social media addiction among children.

    “Can we have a law in this country that can protect children? Can we have a law that will protect women, ethnic minorities and the likes? Can we have a law that call to accountability the activities of the major technology companies providing these services?

    “In Nigeria, with a single handset, you can do a broadcast and you need a license under our laws to set up a broadcast. But under social media, you dont need a license.
    “The whole world has realised that the social media has evolved quickly and has left behind jurisprudence and everybody is making laws to catch up with the fast growing communication system. The people that says there are enough laws in our books to check defamation and libel are not being sincere.

    “The social media came well after some of these legislations have been put in place. Last year, somebody posted fake news on facebook and arising from the spread of that fake news in Kasuwa Magani, Kaduna state, about 50 innocent Nigerians were killed and the guy just walked away.

    “I think we have a problem that Nigerians have to address. Nobody is saying that President Buhari or the parliament should impose a law against the press. I am happy that they will hold public hearing on this and if you have any objection to some of the elements, come forward and tell parliament that you have objection. This country needs a law that will regulate social media and attack fake news.”

  • Fayemi tasks S’West leaders on unity, restructuring, development of region

    The Governor of Ekiti State, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, has urged Southwest leaders to to jettison party politics in the interest of the region for the sustainable development.

    Fayemi said the region can only regain its pride of place in the country’s political configuration unless leaders never allow national politics to divide them.

    He stated that all efforts must be geared by the leaders irrespective of political affinity towards the development of South West region.

    He added that for desirous interest of Yoruba to be promoted and protected, there must be unity of purpose and togetherness.

    Fayemi who spoke in Ado Ekiti on Saturday at a national retreat held by Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), disclosed that the All Progressives Congress governors in the southwest will work with the governor elect in Oyo State, Mr. Seyi Makinde in the interest of the region.

    The governor, however, said Yoruba race needs to be more tactical if desirous to actualise its advocacy issue of restructuring .

    He urged the proponents of the policy in the region to change strategy and reach out to other regions on how to actualise the dream of Nigeria being restructured economically and politically.

    On the deeply entrenched voter apathy in the southwest region, the last election, 16.2 million registered in the southwest, but said the outcome in all the states were shocking.

    There are those who entertained fear on this issue of restructuring and whether this is legitimate or not, we must reach out to them, because we are not an island onto ourselves.

    We don’t need to be shouting on the roof top before we get it, but if we want to do it alone, the agitation will fall”, he warned.

    Expressing regret over voter apathy in the southwest, Fayemi said : “in the last presidential poll, Ekiti registered 909,000 voters , only 381,000 voted, 0sun 1.67million , only 737,000 voted, Ondo, 1.8m registered , 586,00, Oyo, 2.7m registered , 891,000 voted, 2.36m registered in Ogun, 605,000 voted and Lagos with 6.3m, only 1.56m voted.

    This might be caused by deficit of trust or fraudulent multiple registration, but whatever the case was, as long as we remain a constituent part of this country, ARG should reflect on this and act appropriately.

    If it was as a result of deficit of voter education, then the ARG and governments need a lot to do. Religion also affected us, because some people were brainwashed to vote based on religious considerations”.

    The governors of Ondo, Rotimi Akeredolu and Osun, Gboyega Oyetola, said all the distinguishable traits of the southwest region initiated during the old western region must he brought back in the interest of the zone.

    Governors of Osun State, Mr. Gboyega Oyetola, said what could be regarded as distinguishable attributes of the Yoruba people is quest for development and good governance and that these should be sustained in the interest of the people.

    The Osun governor, Oyetola, represented by his chief of staff, Dr. Charles Akinola said: ” the Yorubaness in us and those things that separated us from others are our developmental drives, our intellectual rigour, our brilliance, circumspection and those values however, have not really taken us to where we deserve”.

    Oyetola also appealed to the southwest governments to leverage on its human capital in the diaspora and bring them home for the benefit of all.

    Also speaking, Ondo state governor, Arakunrin Rotimi Akeredolu, represented by the commissioner for Regional Integration, Prof Bayonle Ademodi, added that the southwest is also facing serious economic and political crises that needed to be addressed.

    We have to be really worried that the instability and insecurity in the sahel has started affecting us and we need to get worried.

    We knew we had to think outside the box in the southwest on how to bring our own paradigm and we thought of Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) to work on how to put us back on the right track.

    Akeredolu said the act of using desperation to get into power is becoming high in the region, saying this has made it difficult for people to have control over their leaders.

    The National Chairman of the group, Hon Wale Oshun, reiterated the issue of restructuring and advised that it should be taken back to the front burner to benefit the Yoruba race.

    Oshun said in spite of different decisions taken by the southwest in the last elections that the values of whim he Yoruba people are remain the same.

    The Yoruba people are progressive people. We are lovely and we care for each other . We are welfarists and we remain the same despite out stand in the just concluded governorship and legislative elections.

    All we want as a people is to ensure that our interests at the national level are protected and that we get a fair deal in the scheme of things”.

    Oshun, however, expressed fear that Yoruba language is fast going into extinction due to paradigm shift caused by globalisation and laxity on the part of some parents.

    This is one issue our governments and traditional rulers must correct and prevent from happening. That was why we started the Yoruba academy and we have been working on this with some States’.

    The group’s leader also advocated true federalism urging political leaders in the region to take a firm stand to protect the rights of the Yoruba race.

    Our leaders who know that restructuring is an issue that is germane to speak up the way the ACF used to speak on some national issues”.

  • Atiku insists on restructuring Nigeria if elected president

    Atiku insists on restructuring Nigeria if elected president

    Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2019 elections has re-affirmed his commitment to restructuring if elected on February 16.

    Atiku gave the assurance while addressing thousands of party faithful at a presidential rally at the Adokiye Amiesimaka Stadium in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital on Monday.

    The PDP presidential candidate who was accompanied by his running mate, Peter Obi, and other leaders of the party promised to uphold the rule of law.

    If you (masses) elect PDP and Atiku into office; I will restructure Niger Delta and all other parts of the country. We must restructure the country.

    Secondly, after the Obasanjo/Atiku administration started the East West highway project; till today it has not been completed.

    It has not been completed because we did not vote PDP to continue in power in 2015. The project has been haunted till today. We are going to complete it, if voted into power,” he assured.

    Atiku said his administration would complete the dredging of old Port Harcourt and Onne sea ports if he wins February 16 presidential polls.

    According to him, Rivers state, Niger Delta and South-South had been abandoned by the administration since 2015, notwithstanding being the economic hub of the country.

    Every development that the people of South-South, Niger Delta and Rivers have gotten was done by PDP-led governments. The roads, schools, hospitals and water, among others were provided by PDP.

    I assure you that I will protect the constitution, protect separation of powers and will not interfere with the National Assembly and Judiciary because I believe in checks and balances.

    My administration will uphold rule of law and will never allow the rule of law to be trampled by anybody,” he promised.

    Also speaking, former President Goodluck Jonathan called on the people of the state to come out enmass to vote PDP at all levels.

    He said nepotism, divisiveness, discrimination, factionalism, favouritism, sectionalism and killings had now become prevalent in the country.

    All of us know that things that had never been happening in this country have been happening since 2015. Nigerians can attest if the country has gone forward, backward or static.

    We cannot as a nation continue to stay where we currently are. We believe the only person out of the candidates who can lead us out if this quagmire is Atiku.

    If your son or daughter is qualified to become Inspector-General of Police and Chief of Army Staff, he or she will be appointed. No one will be discriminated. Atiku will lead Nigeria forward,” he said.

    Senate President and Director-General of Atiku Presidential Campaign, Bukola Saraki, said Atiku had experience to take the country to greater heights.

    He said poverty and unemployment had reached an all-time high never seen in the country since its independence in 1960.

    There is poverty in the land and Nigerians are tired of poverty. The people want a man who can bring economic prosperity and that man is Atiku,” he said.

    On his part, PDP National Chairman, Uche Secondus, assured the people of victory at the polls.

    He expressed optimism that Mr Abubakar would win the North Western states of Jigawa, Kebbi, Kaduna, Kano, Sokoto and Zamfara.

    If you want a president that will work for 24 hours daily, a president with capacity and energy and a president who will be in charge and take responsibility, then vote Atiku,” he appealed.

    Hightlight of the rally was the adoption of Governor Nyesom Wike as gubernatorial candidate by 58 political parties in the state.

  • Restructuring: Why I’m disappointed in Buhari – Dickson

    Restructuring: Why I’m disappointed in Buhari – Dickson

    Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State has expressed disappointment over President Muhammadu Buhari’s inability to take a ‘bold step’ in restructuring Nigeria.

    Speaking at the public presentation of a book ‘We Are All Biafrans,’ he said Nigeria cannot move forward until its citizens ‘go back to the faulty structure that we are currently.’

    To achieve this, he charged President Buhari to rise up to the occasion, expressing disappointment at his current disposition.

    Again, I want to call for leadership responsibility from the president of Nigeria. He’s got to use the power, influence and authority of that office to mobilise our country to do the restructuring,” he said. “I regret to say that I feel disappointed that the president didn’t rise to the occasion. It’s a tragedy for our country and also a major tragedy for his own leadership.”

    Dickson said the good structure Nigeria started on was altered when the military took over power in 1966.

    He asked Nigerian leaders to dialogue to resolve any issue at stake while urging for efforts towards national interest.

    What did our founding fathers do that we are failing to do. They sat down, dialogued, disagreed, sometimes walking out of conferences, all those are political tools,” he said. “We shouldn’t be afraid of disagreeing. In fact, we need more disagreement. But the important thing is whether we agree or disagree should be in national interest.”

    He lauded the author, Chido Onoumah, for his initiative while registering his conception of being Biafran.

    Why is this guy saying that we are all Biafrans? I want to make it clear from the beginning that we are all Biafrans in so far as we are concerned about issues of inequity and injustice,” he said.

    Here, the concept of Biafra is used as a constant reminder of the challenges and contradictions of our nation. Then, it is right to say we are all Biafrans because we are all concerned about those contradictions and challenges.

    But I disagree with the concept of Biafra connoting a particular geographical location that wants to be separate with the rest of Nigeria. I don’t agree with that Biafra,” he added.