Tag: Rivers State

  • Rivers crisis: Fubara’s misconception and failure to answer obvious questions – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    Rivers crisis: Fubara’s misconception and failure to answer obvious questions – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    Following the bloody and destructive confrontations, aftermath of the October 5, 2024, heated and contentious local government council election in Rivers State, President BolaTinubu “called on Governor Siminalayi Fubara, political leaders and their supporters in Rivers State to exercise restraint and uphold the rule of law.”

    However, an exasperated Fubara quickly took issue with the president’s plea for peace, expressing concern that Tinubu singled him out for mentioning in the poll’s skirmishes between the warring camps of Fubara and his predecessor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Chief Nyesom Wike.

    Perhaps in response to calls for his intervention in the yearlong Rivers crisis that’s defied his earlier peace overture – and boiled over on October 7, resulting in several deaths and destruction of public infrastructure across Rivers local government areas – Tinubu, via a statement by presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga on October 7, urged armistice among the political gladiators and their supporters.

    The statement reads in part: “In response to recent tensions following last Saturday’s local government council election, the President expressed deep concern over reports of arson and explosions in the state. He urged all political actors to de-escalate the situation and discourage their supporters from engaging in violence or destructive actions.

    “President Tinubu directed the police to restore and maintain peace, law, and order immediately. While instructing law enforcement agencies to bring the situation under control, he emphasised the need to ensure the security of public institutions. President Tinubu said government facilities built with public funds must be safeguarded from vandalism.

    “He stressed that self-help has no place in a democratic system, especially after 25 years of continuous democracy. According to President Tinubu, the judiciary can settle all political disputes, and the outcome of this election should be no exception.”

    But an obviously untrusting Fubara questioned the president’s rationale for mentioning his name alone. As a guest on Channels Television’s ‘Politics Today’ on the same day, Fubara said, “I do not have any issue with it (the president’s intervention) but I am a bit concerned when my name was only mentioned” (while Wike’s name was left out).

    Fubara added: “The issue (political crisis) is very simple. It’s as simple as ABC. Everyone in Nigeria, everyone in Rivers State, knows where this issue is coming from. It’s not rocket science. We know what the issue is and the issue is not Fubara, it is not.”

    Fubara’s knee-jeck reaction – a pattern seen since the supremacy battle between him and Wike – shows a lack of grounding in political nuances. Otherwise, he would’ve realised that President Tinubu’s message was clearly in his favour: He endorsed the conduct of the council poll, by asking aggrieved parties – who didn’t want the election to hold – to go to court for redress.

    Besides, Tinubu tactically recognised Fubara as the political leader in Rivers, and thus the onus on the governor to be in a better – if not the best – position to settle the rift between him and Wike, and the Rivers crisis. (How Fubara will do that is for another day.) That’s why Tinubu mentioned only Fubara’s name in his message of appeal for peace in Rivers.

    But Fubara misconstrued Tinubu’s intention, and, as usual, blamed Wike for the Rivers crisis, and hence the burden on Wike to resolve it. That’s why Fubara rhetoricically asked on the television programme, “Why is the case of Rivers State different? Why is the law or Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria interpreted in a different way when it comes to Rivers State?”

    Who but Fubara, as the Governor and Chief Executive of Rivers State, can provide answers to these posers? Doesn’t he realise that the Rivers’ case is different because he hasn’t come out with the truth about how and where he and Wike “hid the hoes” with which they weeded the Rivers political terrain during the 2023 General Election cycle? And doesn’t Fubara know he hasn’t been interpreting the Law or the Constitution according to the spirit and letter of the grundnorm?

    If the contrary were the case, Fubara shouldn’t have declared that, “I’m aware that RSIEC (Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission) told me they already had an order (of court) mandating them to conduct the (council) election on the 5th of October, 2024, and the security agencies to support them.”

    He added: “So, I think with that order, the election will be held. I might not be a lawyer but I know there is something they call ‘first-in-hand’ (court order), and since they (RSIEC) have the first-in-hand, we will give them all the necessary support for that election to be conducted… And is there any other court unknown to me that is bigger than the Supreme Court of Nigeria, whose judgment concerning a proper constitution of elected Local Government Councils is being obeyed (by the government and RSIEC) in Rivers State?”

    This’s the faulty premise upon which Governor Fubara based the conduct of the council election on October 5, indicating that he isn’t just a layman regarding the law, but one intent on subverting the rule of law, to satisfy his political aspiration.

    The law and the Practice Directions of Courts are clear on the parameters to be applied by the judiciary to solving legal issues. They’re:

    1) Courts of coordinate jurisdiction are equal, one is not superior to the other; and the pronouncements of one court can’t override the other court’s rulings.

    2) All courts judgments must be obeyed, but the latest ruling take precedence over prior order of a court of coordinate jurisdictionon on the same issue(s) for determination.

    3) The pronouncements by the Supreme Court supercede all opinions of the lower courts, viz., the Appeal Court and the High Courts at the federal and state levels.

    Seeming unversed in these rules, Fubara stated that: “However, the Rivers State Government and RSIEC itself also had a judgment that states clearly: Conduct the election with the voters’ register of 2023; and Police, DSS, Nigeria Army and other sister agencies should provide security. I might not be a lawyer, but I understand clearly that when it comes to the issue of judgment, there is something they call ‘first-in-time.’”

    Actually, when it comes to which to apply between pronouncements by courts of equal status, there’s also what’s called, “latest-in-time” – meaning the latest court order(s) should apply. In that instance, the judgment of the Abuja Federal High Court – being the latest on the issues – should supercede the orders of the Rivers High Court on the conduct of the council election, and be obeyed by all parties, pending any application or appeal to set it aside.

    Fubara’s right for asking, “And is there any other court unknown to me that is bigger than the Supreme Court of Nigeria, whose judgment concerning a proper constitution of elected Local Government Councils is being obeyed in Rivers State?”

    There’s no other court “bigger” (higher) than the Supreme Court, which’s the final arbiter in legal matters in Nigeria. But although the Supreme Court mandated the 36 States, including Rivers, to conduct council elections within 90 days (three months), to ensure a “democratically-elected local government system,” the apex court didn’t ask the Rivers government to circumvent an aspect of the process of the election, which’s the lacuna that the Abuja Federal High Court ordered the RSIEC and the Rivers government to rectify before they proceeded with the poll.

    Why did the Rivers government choose to adopt shortcuts to organising the council election? It’s unhelpful citing the exigency of the Supreme Court order to conduct the poll within 90 days. What about other states that’ve fixed their council elections beyond the 90 days ordered by the Supreme Court, and as sanctioned by President Tinubu in an agreement with state governors to conduct the ballots within the timeframe?

    Below is a schedule of dates for local government elections in many states: Akwa Ibom, October 5; Rivers, October 5; Jigawa October 5; Benue, October 5; Plateau, October 9; Kogi, October 19; Kaduna, October 19; Kano, October 26; Cross River, October 26; Nasarawa, November 2; Abia, November 2; Ogun, November 16; Ondo, January 18, 2025; Katsina, February 15, 2025; and Osun, February 22, 2025.

    Will some of these states be in breach of the Supreme Court order, and the agreement with Tinubu simply for conducting the council election outside the timeframe? Certainly not, as they’d scheduled the elections prior to the July 2024 Supreme Court and President Tinubu’s intervention in the matter of financial autonomy for Local Governments!

    Governor Fubara knew why he insisted on conducting the council poll – even when the RSIEC breached the provisions of the Rivers State law guiding the election, which prescribes a 90-day advance notice to political parties participating in the franchise. Fubara’s undisguised aim was – and is – to wrest the political structure of the PDP, from which the Wike faction declined to participate in the election until the issues it took to court were resolved and respected by the Rivers government.

    The question is: What would it’ve caused the Rivers government and RSIEC – in obedience to the Abuja court order – to postpone the election, and give adequate and appropriate notice to the parties before its conduct? One and only crucial thing: Governor Fubara wasn’t sure that he could snatch the political structure from Wike if the Minister’s camp were to participate in the election!

    While it filed a stay of execution and appeal yet to be considered, the Rivers government rejected the Abuja court judgment, and conducted the election won by the Action Peoples Party (APP) – reportedly backed by Fubara as the platform to ply his reelection bid in 2027. That’s been the gameplan, and it’s what the unending Rivers crisis is about!

    The probable obstacles to Fubara reaching and achieving that goal are the series of court cases flying between Rivers and Abuja on the Rivers crisis, and the possibility of a faction of the All Progressives Congress (APC) joining the remnants of the PDP to form a bloc under Wike’s headship. Otherwise, Fubara’s home and dry for his 2027 reelection with the feat his government has attained with the council poll!

    Mr Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria.

  • Gov Fubara approves new minimum wage for Rivers workers

    Gov Fubara approves new minimum wage for Rivers workers

    Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, has approved the payment of N85,000.00 as the new minimum wage for civil servants in the employ of the Rivers State Government.

    This is the agreement reached during a closed door meeting presided over by the Governor and attended by representatives of organised labour under the auspices of the Joint Public Service Negotiating Council in the State at Government House in Port Harcourt on Friday.

    Briefing newsmen after the meeting, the Head of Rivers State Civil Service, Dr George Nwaeke, who spoke on behalf of the Government, affirmed that Governor Fubara has graciously approved a new minimum wage of N85,000.00, adding that the government will begin in November, 2024.

    Dr George said: “He (Gov Fubara) has pronounced a figure that is higher than the National Minimum Wage. He pronounced a sum of N85,000.00, which is higher than the minimum wage that was prescribed nationally.

    “So, as the Head of Service and a major stakeholder in the labour family, I am very happy to say that the Rivers State Civil Servants have never had it this good since the inception of this State.

    “The labour union leaders and all the other major stakeholders were happy with this development,” he added.

    Responding to possible payment of arrears, Dr Nwaeke, said it is yet to be determined because a technical committee has been set up to critically work out a tenable payment chart, which will cater to issues of arrears.

    He clarified, “Issues of arrears will be worked out by the committee that I am going to be Deputy to the SSG. We are already going to work on it in a technical committee that will now get the nitty gritty of the payment and inform the press later.”

    On his part, the Rivers State Chairman of the Joint Public Service Negotiating Council, Comrade Emecheta Chuku, explained that this is their first meeting with Governor Fubara to discuss the issue of the new minimum wage as approved by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    Comrade Chuku pointed to the fact that the gracious approval of N85,000.00 new minimum wage is very appeasing to the labour leaders, addingvthat it demonstrates love for the workers.

    He explained, “For the Governor to come, against all the crisis, against all the things that he is facing and more, to say he will pay N85,000.00 minimum wage, I think our hearts are full of joy.

    “Of course, we have no doubt, knowing the kind of person we have as our Governor. He is a decent man; very responsible enough; and grew through the rank and file of the system. He understands what it takes to earn a living salary; he understands the difference between gifting money and paying somebody salary that can sustain him or her from the first day to the last day of the month.”

    Also speaking, the Chairman, Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Rivers State Chapter, Comrade Alex Agwanwor, noted that the amount approved by Governor Fubara puts Rivers State Government ahead of Lagos State as the highest minimum wage paying State to civil servants in Nigeria.

    He stressed, “Why do I say that? Lagos State said N85,000.00 and Rivers State is paying N85,000.00. The IGRs of Lagos State and Rivers State are not the same. So, for the Governor to agree to pay the same rate with Lagos, that means we are at the top of it.

    “We are the best, and we want to continue to commend the Governor. We assure him that, as far as this State is concerned, labour is going to stand with him. We will be with him even until the next eight years.

    “I want to commend His Excellency, Executive Governor of Rivers State, our own Number One Worker in Rivers State, he has, once again, proven that the workers in Rivers State gave him an award on May Day as the Champion of Labour, as the Most Labour-Friendly Governor in Nigeria. He, again, has shown that to us today, and I want to commend him.”

    He added that they were returning to the State Secretariat Complex to inform workers of the Governor’s magnanimity and benevolence towards civil servants in the State.

  • Rivers APC Chairman reveals those fighting against Gov Fubara

    Rivers APC Chairman reveals those fighting against Gov Fubara

    Dr Tony Okocha, Acting Chairman of the All Progressive Congress(APC) in Rivers State has disclosed that those who contested the last governorship election in Rivers against Siminalayi Fubara in the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) are those fighting against the Governor.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Dr Okocha, was reacting over the Judicial Commission of Inquiry set up by Governor Fubara to investigate the burning of local government offices in the State when he made the disclosure while speaking with newsmen in Abuja on Thursday.

    “The Judicial Commission of Inquiry to investigate the bombing of Local Government offices is just a witch hunt. The governor merely wants to use it to deal with his perceived enemies,” Okocha told newsmen.

    Recall Fubara recently inaugurated the Judicial Commission of Inquiry to investigate the arson, killings and destruction at various local government council secretariats in the state. The seven-member panel, which has one month to conclude its assignment, has Justice Ibiwengi Minakiri as Chairman and Mrs. Inyingi Brown as Secretary.

    It is expected to investigate the attacks and burning of local government councils’ secretariats on October 7, 2024, shortly after newly elected local government officers were sworn in.

    Okocha, while faulting the governor’s action, said that there was no sincerity in it, stressing: “The said election itself was illegal and, thus, a nullity. The governor has said that he knows the people that attacked the local government secretariats. If he knows the people, why not just ask the Police to arrest them? Why is he setting up a judicial commission of enquiry?”.

    Okocha said that he would take the probe seriously if it is stretched  to include all issues of arson that the state had suffered in the past.

    “If the governor really wants justice, the terms of reference of the commission should be all-inclusive. All issues of bombing should be probed. The House of Assembly bombing should be probed.

    “We also want the bombing of the APC State headquarters to be probed. We do not want selective probes. We want to see genuine search for justice. Let’s have a full package  that involves all cases of arson. That is the only way the Rivers government can do justice,” he said.

    On whether he would appear before the panel if invited to do so, Okocha said he would  appear before it “if it will probe all incidents of arson in Rivers”.

    “Yes, I will appear before the panel if all cases of arson in Rivers are included in its assignment,” he said.

    Okocha regretted that the state had become “a Rivers of trouble”, and blamed the situation on “the man who should protect everyone”.

    “The governor is supposed to be the chief law officer, but he has failed in that crucial  task. We have a valid court judgement that stopped the local government election.

    “It is that judgement that stopped the Police, security agencies and INEC from participating in the elections. Strangely, in spite of all, the governor went ahead with the elections. So, clearly, it is a nullity.”

    On the cause of political upheavals in Rivers, Okocha declared that “Fubara is fighting himself”.

    “The governor is fighting himself; the APC is only beginning to get strong now. We used to be just a social club as we have never won any election in Rivers. The PDP won the governorship seat in addition to the three Senate slots, the 12 seats in the House of Representatives and the 32 state assembly seats.

    “So, it is one party fighting itself. The party was elected to serve, but what we are being served  is trouble,” he fumed.

    He said 14 people aspired to govern the state on the PDP platform, but Fubara, “the least of them”, got the ticket and became governor.

    “It means he was favoured over others. People were ignored in his favour and they are angry. Those are the people fighting him,” Okocha said.

    The APC chairman expressed optimism that  Fubara’s squabble with his party would favour the APC in 2027.

    “As the crisis festers, there is no project to Fubara’s name. He has not done anything to the Rivers people in close to two years. As a virile opposition, we are taking the governor on many issues. We want to demarket him so that we shall win the seat in 2027,” he said.

    Okocha said that peace would have returned to Rivers State if Fubara had listened to President Bola Tinubu’s counsel.

    “When Rivers was about to get burnt, President Tinubu stepped in to broker peace. He suggested that all court cases should be withdrawn and the Budget be re-presented before the House of Assembly.

    “He also suggested that members of the House of Assembly should be given access to state matters. I recall that Fubara agreed and told Mr President that peace was priceless while terror was senseless, but we got a different thing when we returned home,” he said.

  • 1965 Western Region returning to Nigeria – By Godwin Etakibuebu

    1965 Western Region returning to Nigeria – By Godwin Etakibuebu

    The political crisis tearing Rivers State into shreds today, which is most likely to become Nigeria’s doomsday affair, if care is not taken, did not start from the Nigerian General election of February and March 2023. It predated it.

    Its genesis started somewhere inside the Moshood Abiola National Stadium in Abuja, during the presidential Primary of the People Democratic Party, when the Party set out to pick a candidate most qualified to be the presidential candidate of the Party in 2023, general election. And that was May 27, 2022.

    Atiku Abubakar; former Vice President to Olusegun Obasanjo, won – but not without intrigues of fraudulent manipulations anyway. These manipulations included, mainly purchasing of delegates with American Dollars – which made the money factor to hold more than Eighty percent of the “rules of the game”. 

    Other factors of tribal and religious sentiments dominated that exercise most faithfully, as the phone call that went between former President Ibrahim Babangida and former Governor of Sokoto State, Aminu Tambuwa, shall always remain a sad reminder of the wicked side of the Nigerian political game. 

    Atiku Abubakar however won – crook or hook.

    While in the other hand, Nyesom Wike, then Governor of Rivers State, became the major loser of the PDP Primary. And the “big man” from Rivers State, and who had dominated Rivers State’s politics like and Octopus for years, had, before the 2022 Presidential Primary, invested so much money in the PDP. It was an obvious fact that he was, and most likely remaining till this moment, the financial livewire of that Political Party – the PDP. 

    It wasn’t not with his money, but the Rivers State’s people’s money. He spent it then anyway, and still spending it today.

    It therefore will be convenient to say that the loss and gain of that day – May 27, 2022, began the battle that has returned Rivers State to the “National Stadium of Hell”. And this is becoming a one dangerous journey that is most likely to take Nigeria along. 

    God forbid bad thing that Nigeria is not consumed in the movement. But before God comes in, to rescue Nigeria, the man that God has given enablement to take over political leadership of Nigeria now, must understand a “role-function” created for him by the same God that made him Nigerian leader.

    So, the following message from the past of our national history below, is meant for President Bola Tinubu – and that is if he has forgotten the journey of 1965’s Western Region into the marketplace of Nigeria. 

    I pray that I have the full attention of President Bola Tinubu as we navigate this historical perspective voyage of discovery.

    The Western Region of 1965 that produced “Operation Weti e” did not come because Obafemi Awolowo was physically around the people at that time. The man – Obafemi Awolowo, had earlier been sentenced to prison on September 11, 1963. So, it was not the presence of the man that made what happen in 1965 happened. It was the injustice that characterised the general election of 1964, with its gradual built-up, that brought us to the waterloo of 1965, until it eventually brought in a collapse of an era, on January 15, 1966.

    I want to posit that this history should remain fresh in our memory. Or it ought to be. It means therefore that going by the documented evidence of that era – the fallout from 1963 to 1965, before 1966; the year of the inferno, every political adult in Nigeria should have seen that hand of political disaster rising from the Coaster State of Rivers, with terrible Tsunami, following. 

    Unfortunately, political ego of a few individuals in any given society, at most times, would not allow them to admit what is politically good for the society in question.

    What are the issues that led to truncating our democratic race of the past era? Let us name them as causes of the 1964 election. They are simple and few.

    1. Inordinate of Crisis
    2. Inordinate ambition for power on the part of all political parties
    3. Inter and intra party rivalry
    4. Intimidation of opposition politicians who were denied fair contest in elections.

    Then let us look at the causes of 1965 problem before an attempt in prophesying into what might likely happen in today’s endeavours.

    1. Western region citizens were bitter that Chief Obafemi Awolowo was in prison
    2. It was believed that the ruling NNDP wanted to retain power at all costs
    3. Opposition candidates were not given equal opportunity to contest the elections.

    Are these malfeasances not so relevant in todays’ Nigeria? Then, Samuel Adegoke Akintola, the former Deputy Premier of Western Region, under the Premiership of Obafemi Awolowo, found a very sweet and cozy ally in the person of Sir Ahmadu Bello – then Premier of Northern Nigeria.

     That was when Samuel Akintola (Deputy Leader of the Action Group) broke away to form the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), and immediately caused his new party to form alliance with the Northern People’s Congress [NPC]. The alliance was called Nigeria National Alliance [NNA).

    Today, Nyeson Wike; who admitted buying contesting forms for all PDP politicians that contested for all the political posts in the 2023 general election, has demonstrated that he is the Political Supremo of Rivers State, including his ability to return all PDP members to their chosen offices during the general election, while at the sometime, divert all the presidential votes to favour the candidate of the opposition party – the APC, who is now the President of the Federal Republic. 

    Such abracadabra shall remain a fervent study case for future students of “Election Rigging”, if any University, in the future, might want to introduce such faculty. But for now, it is worth being fully compensated – from the president to the former governor. But at what cost? Will it worth it at the end – given all the anticipated and articulated calamitous casualties?

    The romance between President Bola Tinubu and his Minister of Federal Capital Territory – Nyesom Wike, for now is quite tantalizing and mesmerizing, and for obvious reason of course. Yes, Wike has “quaked” his own Political Party [PDP] to rumble of ashes – courtesy of Nigerian money, which all of them are wasting anyhow until nemesis shall catch up with them, and of course all POWERS in the country are now properties of one man.

    In a few days’ time [in Wike and his benefactor’s calculation], Minister Wike’s godson; Governor Siminalayi Fubara, could be impeached, again, courtesy of the powers that be, and the Nigerian jaundiced judiciary, and if that happens, can it erode the memory of 1965?

    There was such romance before, according to the story of Samuel Akintola and Sardauna of Sokoto told above.

    Today’s Nigerian leadership should therefore look beyond the sweetness of today’s romance into that dark tunnel of the unknown and take one positive decision: Nigeria to be or not to be

    Why can’t we consider that Nigeria’s future should take priority over our myopic narrow interest?

    And that the Almighty Jehovah God; the Creator of Heaven and Earth [all men and women], including Wike and Fubara, has the supreme Right and Authority of putting an end to every activity of men, including the evil game plans of current leaders! 

    Godwin Etakibuebu; a Veteran Journalist, wrote from Lagos.

    Contact:

    Website: www.godwintheguru.org

    You Tube Channel: Godwin The  Guru

    Twitter: @godwin_buebu

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/godwintheguru

    Facebook: Godwin Etakibuebu

    Facebook Page: Veteran Column

    Telegram: @friendsoftheguru

    WhatsApp: @friendsoftheguru

    Phone: +234-906-887-0014 – short messages only. 

    You can also listen to this author [Godwin Etakibuebu] every Monday; 9:30 – 11am on Lagos Talk 91.3 FM live, in a weekly review of topical issues, presented by The News Guru [TNG].

  • Wike’s vain quest for state capture – By Tony Eke

    Wike’s vain quest for state capture – By Tony Eke

    By Tony Eke

    Literature is so lovely because it reflects some truth on its vast pages of creative vistas. Its illumination of life and lived experiences is all-encompassing, its exploration of the dual reality of our world, as gleaned from its recognition of humane deeds and excoriation of diabolical contrivances generate appreciation of its forms.

    The summative coherence and relevance of a literary work gives it an existential reality of the epoch of its creation. Its so beauteous that literature’s eternal life is denied its creators! What a world!  Yes, the literary process might be deemed as a mere creation, sheer imagination, and merely utopian, but the products of the creative impulses outlive the transient sojourn of great writers who are numbered among the rarely gifted  species of human beings.

    Among thematic imports of classic literature that I’m enamoured of, none is as gripping as a discourse on decision which conveys wisdom or folly of a protagonist in drama and prose or a narrator in an eponymous poem. Unless driven by hubris and inevitably fated to a tragic end, it is choice that would define the course of a character and his approach to circumstances underpinning the plot and its denouement.

    Take away the capacity of a character to make a good choice, then his rationality as referenced in the cognitive process of human behaviour might lend itself to psychological examination or outright psychiatric evaluation. All this is within the realm of literary creation, however.

    A correlation between the aforementioned literary perspective and the role of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory(FCT), Mr. Nyesom Wike in the crisis in Rivers State will unfold some incredulity. No one ever expected Wike to seek the destruction of a man whom he had made, metaphorically speaking. He’s acting like an enraged god bent on killing a devotee it ought to protect.

    This apparent path of volitional choice clearly offers us a glimpse of Wike’s psychology. He initially had two choices, either to bolster the strength and facilitate the success of Rivers State Governor and his godson, Mr. Siminilaye Fubara, or to lay diverse arrows forged in his own smithy and imperil the governor’s path to deliver on his electoral promises and earn the confidence of the electorate.

    The degeneration of the situation from a mere disagreement between a godfather and his godson to a potential threat to the political stability of the country is largely fuelled by the deference of the governor to his former boss at the incipient stage of the crisis. He had exhibited the loyalty of a grateful person who was helped to acquire power on a silver platter, albeit with a proviso.

    But then, what seemed as Wike’s intent on destabilizing his government eventually emboldened him beyond the wildest imagination of many Nigerians. Pummelled for many months, Fubara, had, in a fit of self-assertion, altered his calm visage and gentility of a lamb and metamorphosed into a wild cat!

    Let’s get it clearly. The notion of godfatherism in politics is embedded in the elite theory which presupposes the coming together or relationship between elite and governance in democratic societies. While the theory is applicable to diverse social and governance structures, it describes the convergence of accomplished and wealthy individuals in various fields that pool resources to capture power and influence the course of governance in a polity.

    Although this theory had its foundation in the early writing of Polybus who referred to what we now call elite theory as ‘autocracy’, the 19th century Italian School of Elitism, which was cofounded by Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetono Mosca, and Roberto Michels, became the forerunner of elite theory in the Western World.

    Understandably, politics in this part of the world is basically transactional, a pervasive feature of the prebendal course of Nigeria’s political governance since 1999. As a product of the dysfunctional Nigerian system, Wike is giving an unjustified expression to a seeming elastic greed for huge returns on his investment as a godfather.

    He may not be queried for choosing his successor as it’s largely the norm here, yet it’s unacceptable for a man who had acquired stupendous wealth as ex-Governor to seek total control of the same state. It shows that he may have been infected with a chronic virus which afflicts most members of the Nigerian political class with avarice.

    In that case, the sufferer might need a semblance of psychiatric examination, confinement, and an appropriate procedure to cure him of excessive avaricious craving which confounds our sense of propriety. Good a thing, Fubara is building a psychiatric clinic as a component of the General Hospital in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area!

    What makes the Wike issue a problematic is his strange quest to legitimise an obtuse entitlement mentality. There are many Wikes in the four polar axes of Nigeria that raised and nurtured nondescript politicians as gubernatorial candidates and ensured their victories in the Nigerian way, but none is openly baying for the blood of their successors to maintain a stranglehold on the power levels in states they no longer govern.

    Among the 2023 Class of Governors,  we are well aware of an open but mutual relationship existing between the mentee-governors and their predecessors, with a handful of the incumbents servicing their needs most times but occasionally pandering to the greed of their mentors or sponsors. No right-thinking man will oppose the  continual appreciation of a benefactor but doing so to the detriment of the state and the well-being of the people is totally unacceptable.

    Indeed, Wike is keen on becoming a player in the political drama of state control, but the timing and other extenuating factors have combined to attenuate his vision. Firstly, he’s probably not too informed about the political  dynamics of his home state where no former governor had ever pocketed his successor let alone have free access to the treasury in the last twenty five years. Secondly, while he’s being goaded by Bola Tinubu’s vice-grip on Lagos State, he lacks the temperament to reenact the stealth and tact employed by the latter in his state capture two decades ago. Thirdly, there’s a difference in the ethno-cultural reality of Lagos and Rivers State. Rivers no be Lagos! Whereas Lagos is culturally Yoruba despite its metropolitan outlook, Rivers, as a microcosm of Nigeria’s diversity, will hardly permit the ascendancy of a sole owner of its fortune in the mould of Tinubu. He would probably become the overlord if his ethnicity Ikwere was privileged to have a state and Rumuepirikom made its capital!

    Predictably, Wike is likely to lose and his envisaged loss would emanate from poor decision. He may plunge the state into deeper crises as expected, but his ultimate loss will so erode his social capital that he might find it difficult to play a pivotal role in who gets what in Rivers in 2027. He could however alter the reversal of his political choice by making a u-turn and embracing the other path which he earlier rejected. A good way of doing this is for him to read two poems namely ‘The Road Not Taken’ by Robert Frost and ‘We Really Cool’ by Gwendolyn Brooks. The portrayal of decision as a reflection of our vision and consequences as inviolable in the poems will not be lost on him.

    Tony Eke who is based in Asaba, Delta State, can be reached via tonek6819@gmail.com or on 08035504896 (text only)

  • Rivers of crises – By Dakuku Peterside

    Rivers of crises – By Dakuku Peterside

    The ongoing economic crisis has reached every corner of the nation, touching the rich and poor, urban and rural dwellers alike. With inflation rates climbing to about 33% as of August 2024, living costs have risen dramatically. Food prices alone have skyrocketed by more than 30%, placing a significant strain on household incomes. Families that were once able to get by are now struggling to afford necessities like food, fuel, and healthcare.

    This is not a crisis we can afford to ignore.

    Many Nigerians feel their government, both at the local and State levels, works against them rather than for them. Government institutions, law enforcement agencies, and tax offices are often seen as riddled with inefficiency and bribery. This makes navigating daily life even more difficult for average citizens, who must contend with constant bureaucratic hurdles. It’s the average citizen who bears the brunt of these systemic flaws.

    Amid these crises, Nigeria’s democracy itself is under threat. Citizens’ faith in democracy is fast eroding. When the economic, governance, and security systems fail, the public’s ability to participate in governance and enjoy basic rights promised by democracy is severely hampered. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Rivers State, a region whose political crisis has become a significant threat to Nigerian democracy.

    Despite several attempts to stabilise the situation, the crisis deepens, creating nationwide concern. Due to its oil resources and geographical location, Rivers State, one of Nigeria’s most strategic states, has become a focal point for political conflict. The State’s political turmoil has far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s democratic health, as instability in one of the nation’s most economically significant states sends shockwaves through the broader political landscape.

    Efforts by political leaders and mediators to resolve the crisis in Rivers have so far proven unsuccessful. Tensions in the State are continuously high, making it a potential battleground for violence. This situation has become so concerning that democracy advocates across Nigeria worry about the ripple effects this crisis could have nationwide. If left unresolved, the unrest in Rivers may undermine the very foundation of Nigeria’s democracy, leading to a potential outbreak of violence.

    One of the key reasons this crisis poses such a grave threat is its impact on democratic institutions. The judiciary, police, and security agencies,  which are meant to uphold the rule of law and protect citizens, were intensely scrutinised during the Rivers crisis. In particular, the judiciary has been accused of being politically influenced, leading to a loss of public trust in its impartiality. In Rivers, conflicting court rulings have further eroded confidence in the justice system. This manipulation of legal outcomes raises severe concerns about the future of democracy in the State and, by extension, the nation.

    Similarly, the media’s role in shaping public perception and its potential impact on the crisis cannot be overlooked. The media, often accused of bias and sensationalism, can escalate or de-escalate the crisis through its coverage. Its influence on public opinion can either fuel or dampen the flames of political discord. This perception undermines the credibility of these institutions, making them seem like tools of political elites rather than defenders of public safety.

    The perceived compromised stance of the Nigerian police on the Rivers crisis has increased the potential for violence, as citizens increasingly lose confidence in the capacity of police to be an impartial law enforcement institution. The general perception is that Nigerian police is an active participant in the crisis.

    The effect of this crisis is not limited to Rivers State alone. It also has broader implications for the national government, particularly the legislative and executive arms. Many Nigerians are now questioning the federal government’s ability to intervene and restore order in the State. The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Nigeria’s main opposition party, also feels the strain. Because all the key actors profess to belong to the party, the party’s inability to resolve the political turmoil in Rivers is further damaging its public image. Already viewed by many as an ineffective opposition, the PDP risks losing even more public trust as the crisis drags on. A 2023 public opinion poll showed that only 34% of Nigerians had confidence in the PDP, compared to 42% in 2021. The internal divisions within the party, exacerbated by the conflict in Rivers, threaten to fracture it further, potentially weakening Nigeria’s democratic process.

    At the core of the Rivers State crisis is a fierce power struggle for control over the State’s vast resources and a vague unknown entity called ” political structure”. Unfortunately, rather than focusing on the development of the State and the welfare of its people, political actors in Rivers are more concerned with personal gain. The fierce competition for political dominance has led to violence, instability, and the neglect of the State’s economic potential. Despite being one of Nigeria’s resource-endowed states, Rivers remains underdeveloped, with inadequate infrastructure and high unemployment. In 2023, the unemployment rate in the State was estimated to be 33%, reflecting the failure of successive governments in the last ten years to translate its natural resources into tangible benefits for its citizens.

    Several factors have exacerbated the crisis, including personal ego clashes between political actors, a sense of imperial entitlement among the elite, and the combative nature of political discourse in the State. Political figures in Rivers often engage in inflammatory rhetoric with little regard for diplomacy or civil discourse, which does not represent the average Rivers man who is decent and polished. This toxic communication has only deepened the divisions, making resolution more difficult. However, there are potential solutions to this crisis. Dialogue, compromise, citizens’ action and focusing on the common good can help bridge the political divide. It’s essential for all stakeholders to unite against the crisis, setting aside personal ambitions for the greater good. None of the actors should assume the role of Emperor-in-Chief of Rivers State. It would only lead to self-destruct.

    Rivers’ current political crisis bears a troubling resemblance to the events in Western Nigeria during the early 1960s. Known as the “Wild Wild West” era, that period of political instability, violence, and lawlessness culminated in Nigeria’s first military coup in 1966. The crisis in Western Nigeria showed how unchecked political impunity and violence could threaten the very fabric of democracy. Many fear a similar outcome could occur in Rivers if the political actors involved do not change course. The failure to learn from history may turn Rivers State into a ticking time bomb, threatening the country’s democratic future.

    Democracy thrives on institutions that remain impartial and strong, but developments in Rivers State threaten critical guardrails like security agencies and the judiciary. Security forces, particularly the police, have been accused of aligning with political factions, eroding public trust and escalating violence. Former President Goodluck Jonathan has voiced concern that the conflicting judgments issued by the judiciary on political matters are eroding confidence in the justice system. The Chief Justice of Nigeria and the National Judicial Council must step in and save the judiciary from self-destruction arising from the Rivers’ crises.

    Governor Siminialayi  Fubara has a duty to steer Rivers towards stability. Having been elected to govern, he is responsible for driving the development of the State and should be allowed to provide leadership. His failure to discharge that responsibility of leadership will stain his legacy. Former Governor Nyesom Wike, now the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, must focus on his new role and allow the current governor to handle Rivers’ challenges.

    As history has shown, violence is not a solution to democratic issues. The burning of Local Government Area secretariats and other violent acts break the rule of law. Such actions damage the State’s reputation, set her development in reverse gear, and undermine the very foundations of democracy. Political actors must recognise that self-help and violence are counterproductive in resolving democratic challenges. The Inspector General of Police has to live above board and act in the spirit and letter of the law to protect lives and properties.

    Political leaders involved in the Rivers crisis must urgently exercise restraint and responsibility. The people of Rivers deserve a break from the constant chaos and conflict that has plagued their State. Rivers’ people who bear the brunt of this crisis must rise to the occasion, foster discussions, express dissatisfaction with irresponsible politicians and demand good conduct.

    As a stakeholder in Rivers’ politics and her development, speaking out is my moral duty. Silence is no longer an option in the face of such widespread destruction and lawlessness.

    I refrained from commenting on the crisis for nearly a year, hoping that reason would prevail. However, it has become clear that without solid voices defending democratic values, the state risks descending further into instability. Intellectuals and other thought leaders must step forward to provide reasoned discourse and help guide the State through these turbulent times. Rivers risks sliding into anarchy without these voices, and Nigeria’s fragile democracy could be at risk.

  • Why political crisis in Rivers State must be resolved quickly – Okupe

    Why political crisis in Rivers State must be resolved quickly – Okupe

    A former presidential spokesman, Dr Doyin Okupe has said the political crisis bedevilling Rivers State has got to a point where it could seriously harm the nation’s democracy.

    Okupe, in an interview on Sunday, said the crisis has the potential to destabilise the nation, if not quickly resolved. He described the feud  between Gov. Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers and his predecessor and FCT Minister, Mr Nyesom Wike and the attendant political tension in the state as unfortunate.

    “Going down memory lane, one is sad to note that the feud between Wike and Fubara is comparable to that between late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and the then Premier of the Western Region, Chief Samuel Akintola.

    “As remote and limited this crisis was then, it was one of the precursors of the collapse of that republic. It will be wise for the Federal Government and men of goodwill in Rivers and the entire nation to move in on this matter before it goes completely, and uncontrollably out of hands,” Okupe said.

    According to him, it is clear that only political solution, no matter how difficult it is to arrive at, can be effective in resolving all issues and all sides in the crisis.

    Wike and his successor, Fubara, have been engaged in political struggle over the control of the state for some months now, which has created tension in the state and  polarised the state assembly.

    The crisis worsened following the conduct of the Oct. 5  council elections ,the outcome of which led to  violent destruction of some council secretariats by political thugs.

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja  had on Thursday affirmed a lower court’s decision ,nullifying the state’s  2024 budget signed into law and being operated by Fubara, further creating uncertainty.

    The N800 billion budget was passed in December 2023 by a faction of the  state’s House of Assembly loyal to Fubara, led by Edison Ehie.

  • Rivers: An Emperor’s road to Harakiri – By Chidi Amuta

    Rivers: An Emperor’s road to Harakiri – By Chidi Amuta

    On May 17th 2024, this column published a piece with the tittle “An Emperor and His Nemesis”. It was a prognostic analysis of the impending political crisis in Rivers State because of the suffocating hold of ex-governor Wike on his surrogate, Siminalayi Fubara,  the incumbent governor of the state. Recent events in the politics of the state,  especially the just concluded successful local government election coup by the governor, indicate an inevitable nasty end to Mr. Wike’s untidy career as an overbearing political god father. We may indeed be witnessing Mr. Wike’s speedy race into political irrelevance and inevitable Harakiri.

    The drama of unrelenting political bad behaviour in Rivers State has entered  a decisive street corner. Incumbent governor Mr. Siminalayi Fubara has dealt what looks like a killer blow on his principal political adversary god father.  The Governor, pushed to the wall for most of his one and half year tenure, has managed to survive on political life support. It has been a combination of legal somersaults and  political gymnastics.

    Conflicting court orders and judgments have climbed on each other just as political strategems have wrestled with each other. But last weekend, Governor Fubara’s latest political ingenuity paid off. He organized a local government election with all candidates for the 23 local governments drawn from a strange APP –All Peoples Party. In a political quicksand, all but one of the local government council chairmanships were won by candidates of the strange party. By this masterstroke, Governor Fubara has further spinned the ever turning political wheel on his chief adversary, FCT minister, Nyesom Wike. This outcomes means that the grassroot political machinery of the state is now squarely in the hands of the embattled governor.

    In the interim, all the political outcomes seem to favour the governor even though the aftershocks are still gathering storm.  But most of the significant political voices in the state and around the country have come out openly to condemn Mr. Wike’s long standing nuisance value in the politics of the state. While the Rivers storm continues to blow, most speculations are that Mr. Wike’s imperial reign over Rivers politics seems to be entering its final days.

    No one can ignore the tragic aftermath of the recent local government elections either. At least three local government secretariats have been razed. Property has been destroyed while some lives have been lost. The credibility of the Nigeria police as an agent of law and order has been badly degraded as accusations of partisanship fly around. Predictably, the judicial battles are far from over. The Abuja Federal High Court has ruled in favour of the legitimacy of the pro-Wike opposition House of Assembly. Governor Fubara has since rushed to the Supreme Court  to challenge this ruling.

    In the aftermath of the post-Local government election agitations and violence, the partisans have reverted to their expected recourse. Governor Fubara has taken recourse to government’s responsibility to investigate the violent reactions and identify their authors. On their part, the disaffected partisans have continued to protest and prepare for further disorder and court mischief.

    The Rivers political crisis is far from over. At best, the grassroots will be dominated by governor Fubara while the legislative power in Port Harcourt may be shared between the governor’s loyalists and his opposition legislators. The rest is a matter for political navigation.

    Unfortunately, as the unfolding drama goes on, there is very little real governance going on in the state. If this turf war goes on and worsens, Rivers state may be another sad case of a state with immense resources but an arrested development. The ordinary people of the state may end up as the ultimate losers in this drama of an emperor with his ultimate nemesis.

    The nasty wrestle between Governor Fubara and his mentor reveals the full gamut of intrigues that usually characterize the relationship between political god fathers and their surrogates. Mr. Wike did an untidy job of handing the baton of state governorship to his former state Accountant General. The illicit logic was perhaps that the critical challenge of all former governors in Nigeria is the extent to which they control the bag of nasty tricks played with public money while they were in office. Who better to guard your money secrets when you leave office than the chief book keeper of the state? That thinking seems to be what fueled the emergence of Mr. Fubara. The childish logic behind that calculation seems to have gone  up in smoke now that governor Fubara, has rediscovered that he is first and foremost a state governor and not an errand boy of a departed emperor. His recognition seems to be that  he needs to be in both office and in power in order to command credibility no matter how they got to office.

    The trouble is perhaps that Mr. Wike schemed to put Fubara in office and not in power from the beginning. The governor  seems to have realized that the opposite is what he needs. He needs to be in both power and in political office.  The key hubris committed by Mr. Wike is that he did  not allow Fubara to be  minimally in office. He therefore reportedly surrounded the new governor with commissioners whom he himself chose. He reportedly dictated the portfolios, reporting line and created a separate line of reporting which ultimately ended with him in far away Abuja. Most importantly, all the state legislators were sponsored and loyal to Mr. Wike.

    As it were, Wike was also to informally run Rivers State from his duty post in Abuja. He also put in place a coterie of local government chairpersons in all 23 local governments. Effectively, the entire political structure of Rivers state was in Mr. Wike’s back pocket. He himself openly boasted that he had paid the nomination fees of all political office holders in the state.

    In order to keep his home base in tact politically, Wike maintained an eagle eyed watch over the state as an extension of his political manor. He had while in office either alienated or marginalized all major political voices in the state. An army of political jobbers and handpicked war lords maintained surveillance for Mr. Wike from inside the governor’s office,  the state assembly and the local governments. An imperial rule was put in place over an entire state and has lasted for nearly 9 years.

    But in pursuit of his imperial oversight  over the state, Mr. Wike forgot a few rules of power incumbency. A man in a powerful political office such as that of a state governorship would want to be seen to wield the power of his office. Secondly, there can be only one captain on board a ship of state.  The commissioners were either serving Wike or Fubara. Similarly, the state legislators could not afford to be at variance with the governor who pays their salaries, allowances and sundry costs. Most importantly, the rule that governs the relationship of a political god father and his surrogate is ruled by distance. The political god father must keep his distance .

    A god father who insists on having overriding influence over  his surrogate and also sharing political visibility  and the limelight with the surrogate is preparing for suicide. Wike wanted both control, influence and visibility. At the slightest opportunity, he was present in Rivers state, attending church events, child naming ceremonies and inconsequential political hangouts. He readily converted them into childish political sermons and an opportunity to visit key constituencies and holding sundry political meetings.  Confronted with such a god- father, the incumbent who wants to survive in office has only one choice: commit political regicide in order to regain his freedom and realize the object of his ascendancy.

    Ordinarily, President Tinubu should have intervened to ease the political tension. Instead, the role of President Tinubu in the crisis is  a bit more problematic. He had a primary responsibility to ensure peace and security in Rivers state failing which he would be confronted with an impossible national security challenge. He needed to protect Wike who had become his political axe man in Rivers in order to use him to guarantee APC support in the strategic state.

    Ostensibly , Wike had risked his political neck in order to guarantee both electoral victory and political support for Tinubu and the APC in Rivers. The President needed to play multiple impossible roles: impartial political arbiter as head of state, interested political leader of an embattled APC in Rivers, the protector of the political interest of his minister  of the strategic FCT. That was the source of the early agreement that restored minimal co-operation between Wike and Fubara. But that respite evaporated soon enough because it was untenable and not founded in any sensible appreciation of the realities of Rivers politics. Tinubu’s earlier intervention was too heavily weighted in favour of Wike to be tenable.

    But the grounds of that agreement were precarious and tenuous. It did not have understanding or control of the crucial factors that determine what happens in Rivers politics. The flow of money to oil the machinery of support cannot be controlled from Abuja at this point. There is no open campaign and so ‘political money’ cannot be used to buy support in the state. There is a limit to Wike’s personal war chest. He is not contesting an election in the state and cannot run riot with FCT resources as he probably could with state resources as Rivers state governor. Only Mr. Fubara has control over the money and power required to keep political support in Rivers State.

    Most importantly, time has passed in favour of the governor and his consolidation of power. He has reached out to his Ijaw  roots. They in turn have taken possession of their son in power. Fubara’s governorship is no longer a private arrangement between him and Wike. It is now an Ijaw governorship pitted against an upland conspiracy symbolized by Wike.

    In recent times, Ijaw nationalism has acquired an unmistakable militancy  which it has weaponized in pursuit of resource control at  national and international  levels. Niger Delta nationalism in pursuit of resource equity in Nigeria has become part of the international vocabulary about minority rights in the new world. The ability of the Ijaw to make life impossible for the rest of Nigeria is no longer in doubt. That capacity is even more enlarged in the context of states like Rivers, Bayelsa and Delta especially.

    Therefore, Mr. Wike’s open threats to Fubara’s governorship reminded the governor that he is primarily an Ijaw son. As the political table seems to have turned in favour of Fubara, Tinubu has no choice than to retreat and find cover under the fire power of the changed canvas of the confrontation. He cannot afford to endanger the national oil and gas golden goose of the Niger Delta. He cannot also afford to back a minister who seems to be losing his support base very fast. It is safer to play and sound neutral and statesmanlike. This is why Tinubu has retracted to the “law and order” safe trench while leaving Wike to fend for himself.

    Meanwhile, the crisis has altered the politicallandscape of partisan alliances in Rivers state. Key political heavy weights of the old PDP in Rivers have repositioned on the side of the governor and away from the ever belligerent Wike. Key political figures like Odili, Secondus, Opara, Omehia and some in the Amaechi APC have swung towards the governor. Unfortunately, there is no end to the number of political enemies that Wike made during his imperial overlordship of the state as governor. These have now become natural allies of the governor. Inside his own party, the PDP, Mr. Wike may not find the support to fight a local battle in the state. A state that had previously been celebrated as a PDP state is now so badly shaken that it is neither a PDP state nor an APC state. Wike has himself become something of a political bat, neither a bird nor a mammal. He is neither APC nor PDP.

    At the national level, he is tolerated by the APC hierarchy as the president’s hatchet man  and ‘friend’ but a risky political capital. If Tinubu admits him into APC, it will be a risk he took alone and may have to pay for later. The PDP at the national level cannot re-embrace Wike because he is a divisive figure who has grossly damaged the party and literally neutralized its national and state chances.

    The interesting political spectacle that lies ahead in Rivers State is not the plight of Fubara. The governor has finally dug into the essential power nexus of the state and also eroded the grassroot power base of his traducer.

    What lies ahead is the fate that lies ahead of Mr. Wike. His home base is degraded. His political solidarity in the state is splintered. What remains of it are merely mendicants and lightweights, peoplewho rely on Wike for handouts to keep afloat. Most politically consequential Rivers people have moved on away from Wike.

    His national partisan affiliation is doubtful. His continued political relevance now hands mostly on his relationdhip with President Tinubu and and his nussance presence as FCT minister. If he loses the confidence of Tinubu or loses his portfolio as FCT minister, he might as well find himself an exile home in Abuja. What remains of it are merely mendicants and lightweights, peoplewho rely on Wike for handouts to keep afloat. Most politically consequential Rivers people have moved on away from Wike.

    He has to face the many tragic possibilities that await a political god father when they run out of relevance and options.  First, he could be chased into involuntary exile by his erstwhile surrogate. The man he created and installed could make life impossible for him by eroding all his leverage on resources and patronage. He might even need the written permission of the incumbent to visit his home village in extreme cases. The god father could be literally “killed” politically by being denied political followership and relevance in his erstwhile power base.

    In all these gruesome possibilities, what we witness is the previous man of power, a deserted emperor  walking towards a deserved Harakiri.

  • Rivers govt heads to Supreme Court, insists pro-Wike lawmakers no longer members of Rivers Assembly

    Rivers govt heads to Supreme Court, insists pro-Wike lawmakers no longer members of Rivers Assembly

    The government of Rivers State has said that a notice of stay of execution of the Appeal Court judgment has been filed against Martins Amaewhule and other pro-Wike lawmakers from parading themselves as members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    A statement by D.I. Iboroma, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and Rivers State Attorney General & Commissioner for Justice, said Amaewhule and his colleagues remain former members of the Rivers State House of Assembly following their resignation from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    According to the Rivers State Attorney General, the matter before the Appeal Court was not the status of the lawmakers but whether the National Assembly by virtue of the crisis in the State Assembly then, could take over the Legislative functions of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    The statement reads:
    “Today, the 10th day of October 2024, the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division dismissed Appeal No. CA/ABJ/133/CS/2024 filed by His Excellency, the Governor of Rivers State against the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division in suit No. FHC/ABJ/133/CS/2023 delivered on the 22nd day of January, 2024.

    “It is important to state the facts and history of the case and the appeal thereof.

    “On the 30th day of October, 2023, after the failed attempt to impeach His Excellency, the Governor of Rivers State, the Rivers State House of Assembly became polarized into two factions. The faction led by Martin Amaewhule proceeded to the Federal High Court, Abuja Division and filed Suit No. FHC/ABJ/1613/CS/2023, on the 29th day of November, 2023.

    “Subsequently, on the 11th day of December, 2023, Martin Amaewhule and others defected from the Peoples Democratic Party that sponsored their election in the 2023 Legislative Assembly Election, to the All Progressives Congress.

    “By operation of Law, particularly Section 109(i) (g) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), Martin Amaewhule and 26 others automatically lost their seats as members of the Rivers State House of Assembly on the 11th day of December, 2023, as Section 109(1)(g) is self executory as no court order is required thereof.

    “His Excellency, the Governor of Rivers State on the 13th day of December, 2023, presented the 2024 Appropriation Bill to the Rivers State House of Assembly, led by Rt. Hon. Edison Ehie, who was recognized as the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly at the time. The Appropriation Bill was later passed into Law and became the Appropriation Law of 2024. An Appropriation Law is a state law within the purview of the High Court of Rivers State.

    “Following the crisis in the Rivers State House of Assembly and the intervention by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, that the parties withdraw their cases in Court, to allow peace reign, His Excellency the Governor of Rivers State obeyed the President’s directive and withdrew his cases and the processes he filed in Suit No FHC/ABJ/1613/CS/2023. Martin Amaewhule and others disobeyed the President and did not withdraw Suit No. FHC/ABJ/1613/CS/2023 and proceeded to obtain judgment against His Excellency, the Governor of Rivers State.

    “After the judgment of the Court of Appeal today, there is a gale of misrepresentation and misinterpretation that Martin Amaewhule & 26 others remain members of the Rivers State House of Assembly with Martin Amaewhule as the speaker thereof. This is patently false. The defection of Martin Amaewhule and 26 others was not an issue for determination in the Federal High Court, Abuja and the Court of Appeal. What was in issue was the 2023 Appropriation Law and the National Assembly taking over the Legislative functions of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    “Dissatisfied with the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, His Excellency, the Governor has directed his lawyers to file an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court and also file an application for stay of execution of the judgment of the Court of Appeal. That maintains the status quo.

    “Accordingly, His Excellency, the Governor of Rivers State urges the good people of Rivers State to ignore the purveyors of fake news bent on misleading the good people of Rivers State.”

  • Rivers elders back Gov Fubara amidst political tensions

    Rivers elders back Gov Fubara amidst political tensions

    The Rivers Elders and Leadership Forum (RIVLEF) has declared its support for Governor Siminalayi Fubara amidst the escalating political tensions in the State.

    RIVLEF Chairman, Chief Rufus Ada-George, announced the forum’s position during a news conference on Thursday in Port Harcourt.

    Ada-George praised Fubara for demonstrating courage and maintaining a peaceful stance despite unwarranted provocations by certain politicians in Rivers.

    “We commend Fubara for his courage and determination in standing firm and resolute in defending the interests of the people of Rivers state.

    “The governor, his team and the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) have been bold in upholding democracy and democratic values.’’

    Ada-George, a former governor of Rivers, expressed gratitude to President Bola Tinubu for his interventions aimed at reducing political tensions in the state.

    He, however, criticised the president for allegedly failing to admonish the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, for his role in the crises.

    “President Tinubu has called for peace and advised aggrieved political parties and individuals dissatisfied with the outcome of the local government elections to seek redress through the courts.

    “However, the failure to mention Wike, a key figure in the political crises, sends the wrong signal.’’

    The chairman remarked that the battle for political structures and influence in the state was over, as the people had made their choices in the recently concluded local government elections.

    He noted that the people were the true custodians of political structures and urged dissenting voices to remain silent.

    “The people of Rivers have now restructured and any resort to violence and arson will not benefit us.

    “Therefore, we call on the police to promptly implement President Tinubu’s directive to secure local government offices, maintain law and order and protect lives and property,” he advised.

    Ada-George further commended residents of the state for their active participation and peaceful conduct during the elections.

    Dr Gariel Toby, a former Deputy Governor in Rivers, expressed confidence in the policy’s ability to maintain peace in the state.

    He reaffirmed the forum’s trust in the law enforcement agencies’ ability to carry out their duties despite concerns over police partisan actions prior to the elections.

    The forum’s membership includes prominent national figures such as retired Rear Adm. Ochegomie Fingesi, former member of the Armed Forces Ruling Council.

    Others are retired Group Capt. John Kalio, former Military Administrator of Yobe, Sen. Andrew Uchendu, foremost environmental and rights activist, Annkio Briggs, and Chief Anabs Sara-Igbe, among others.