Tag: Sagay

  • Sagay fires back at Senate, insists ‘your outrageous salaries, allowances running Nigeria dry’

    The row between the Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Anti-Corruption, PACAC, Prof. Itse Sagay and the National Assembly members especially those of the red chambers is not about to end as the embattled chairman insisted that he won’t stop criticizing the NASS members as long as their bogus salaries, allowances are not reviewed.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that Sagay was reacting to a statement by the Senate on Thursday, calling him possessed and speaking under influence, said the lawmakers were draining Nigeria dry and the evidence is flying everywhere for all to see.

     

    The PACAC chair insisted that he would not stop criticizing members of the National Assembly for their expenditure, which he said was adversely affecting the economy.

    His words: “I criticize them for the huge amount of money they are taking out of the country.

    “They are creating a situation in which Nigeria does not have enough funds; we have kidnapping, there is Boko Haram, we have militants, armed robbery and so on.

    “That is basically what I said. I spoke the truth. They have wardrobe allowance, in other words, we are the ones buying clothes for them to wear.

    “When they arrived Abuja, were they naked? What is their problem?”

    The legal luminary had lamented that National Assembly allocated N125 billion to themselves alone this year and that while the United States President earns $400,000 per annum, a Nigerian senator earns over $1.7 million.

    Sagay said besides a basic salary of N2.4 million per month, they earn allowances such as hardship (50 percent of basic salary), newspaper allowance (50 percent), wardrobe allowance (25 percent), entertainment (30 percent), recess (10 percent), and leave (10 percent), among others.

    The total allowances, he said, amounts to N29.5 million per month and N3.2 billion per annum.

    “Perhaps the most notorious example of the legislators’ resistance to the war against corruption is the rejection of the right of the executive to choose the persons who will spearhead that struggle,” he added.

    “The clear impression is created that Nigerian legislators are in office for themselves and not for the populace.”

    “Not surprisingly, the National Assembly has not passed a single bill for the promotion of anti-corruption war since it commenced business in July 2015.”

     

  • Sagay is possessed, speaks under influence – Senate

    The Senate on Thursday said the utterances of the chairman of the Presidential Action Committee on Anti-Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay on its activities shows that he is either possessed or speaks under the influence anytime he does.

    The upper chamber accused the PACAC boss of spreading falsehood and making hate speeches against the National Assembly.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that Sagay recently accused the National Assembly of hindering the fight against corruption in Nigeria. He also asked them of receiving outrageous salaries and entitlements that were more than that of the United State’s President.

    The Senate, therefore, advised President Muhammdu Buhari to caution him (Sagay) so as not to permanently set the legislature and executive arms of government against each other.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi stated this in Abuja.

    The Senate spokesperson in a statement noted that Sagay was fond of using every opportunity he has to make public speeches to disparage the Federal Legislature by using uncouth and unprintable words to describe the legislators and the institution they represent.

    He said that Sagay had been one of the few divisive elements in the Buhari administration who believe their relevance is enhanced only when they create constant tension between the legislature and the executive while also setting members of the executives against each other.

    Abdullahi noted that while the legislators had ignored past statements made by the Professor of law, his recent speech at a public lecture in Lagos organized by the Society of International Law where he gave false details about the salary and allowances of the legislators and the various bills passed bordered on inciting members of the public against the legislators and deliberately circulating hate speech; which the government is working hard to contain.

    Abdullahi said, “Ordinarily, we would ignore Sagay whose statements and attitude present him like a rascal and sadist instead of a former university teacher.

    “However, his last speech in Lagos during which he was reeling out false and exaggerated figures about the salaries and allowances of legislators and also lied about the passage of anti-corruption bills showed that he just deliberately set out to undermine the legislative institution and lower its reputation in the estimation of right thinking members of the society and we, therefore, believe we should put him in his rightful place.

    “As an academic whose creed should be to find facts and make comments based on truth, we believe that Sagay should stop spreading beer parlour rumours about the salaries and allowances of legislators when he could simply get the facts from the Revenue Mobilization and Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMFAC) which is the body constitutionally charged with the responsibility of fixing salaries and allowances of all public officials.

    “Let us make it clear that our salaries and allowances are open books and the details can be taken from the RMFAC by any interested party.

    “Prof. Sagay at his lecture in Lagos also made comparisons which did little credit to his background as a lecturer as he was talking of the salary of the United States President and that of a Nigerian legislator. That is like comparing oranges with apples. Only a senile, jaded, rustic and outdated Professor of Law like Sagay will make such a comparison which falls flat on its face, even to an ordinary lay man. Surely, Sagay is basing his analysis on street talks.

    “Sagay could not even check the records before proclaiming that ‘the National Assembly has not passed a single bill for the promotion of anti-corruption war since it commenced business in July 2015′. First, the 8th National Assembly was inaugurated on June 9, 2015 not July. Also, it is on record that the Senate has passed the Whistle Blowers’ Protection Bill, Witness Protection Bill, Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Bill and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Agency Bill.

    “This man talks like a man who is constantly under the influence of some substance and perhaps possessed as he employs the language of a tout with no civility. He is probably constantly excited and incensed by the fact of having his first opportunity to find himself in the corridors of power.

    “He pontificates and talks as if the war against corruption of the Buhari administration depends solely on him to survive. He once publicly attacked the Attorney General of the Federation and accused him of not doing enough to prosecute the war. In the Lagos speech, he took a blanket swipe at the judiciary and rubbished that entire institution which he as a lawyer has the professional, ethical and constitutional duty to respect.

    “This is a man who cannot stand for Councilorship election and win. We challenge him to state what his contributions are in the election of our amiable President, Muhammadu Buhari and what new ideas he has contributed to making the fight against corruption more effective since his appointment. With an easily excited man like him as head of an advisory body, the nation has continued to lose anti-corruption cases in courts due to the failure of his advice. He needs to do more work and talk less because media prosecution cannot win the war on corruption.”

    The Senate, therefore, called on the President to caution Sagay and stop him from further creating needless tension in the relationship between the executive and the legislature.

     

  • Corruption: Arrest lawmakers ignoring your invitation, Sagay tells EFCC, Magu

    Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay has asked the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to arrest any lawmaker that refused to honour its invitation.

    He insisted that the National Assembly must recognise EFCC as an institution and that no law says an arrest warrant must be sent to it before a lawmaker can appear before the EFCC.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that the EFCC had on June 20 invited the Senator representing Anambra North Senatorial District, Senator Stella Oduah but she refused to honour the invitation.

    She was invited over petitions in connection to the purchase of two armoured BMW vehicles at N255m by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority, NCAA, during her tenure as Aviation Minister.

    Sagay in reaction said, “The EFCC is an institution; so, recognising Magu or not is totally irrelevant and until the Supreme Court says Magu is no longer chairman or acting chairman.

    The Senate cannot refuse to recognise Magu or the EFCC as an institution.

    If the EFCC invites you, you must go. There is no law that says invitation letters must come through the leadership of the National Assembly.

    The EFCC can inform the leadership as a matter of courtesy but letters should go directly to the person being invited.

    The danger now is that if they keep insisting on this, the EFCC will arrest her”.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that the National Assembly leadership had earlier told members to ignore invitations from the anti-graft agency.

  • Sagay is totally irresponsible for denigrating democratic institutions – Senate

    The Senate has said the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Itse Sagay is totally irresponsible for denigrating (National Assembly) democratic institutions.

    The upper chamber said this while reacting to a statement credited to Sagay, stating that the 8th Senate as the worst in the history of Nigeria.

    He had described the ongoing constitution amendment by the National Assembly as a hypocritical exercise.

    Sagay blasted the Senate for rejecting the devolution of powers to states and refusing to ensure 35 per cent affirmative action for women.

    However, the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Aliyu Sabi-Abdullahi on Saturday said Sagay’s statement was “nonsensical” and could disintegrate the country.

    He said, “He (Sagay) is entitled to his opinion. That people can make nonsensical statements is the beauty of democracy but to be totally irresponsible in denigrating state and democratic institutions is definitely unacceptable. He is not speaking as a private citizen, given his position in this government.

     

    “He needs to guard his utterances. He is in a democratically elected government brought about by the electoral victory of our great party made possible by the collective efforts of party members, including members of the Senate and House of Representatives.

    “If he does not understand the decorum and values of democracy, let him go back to the classroom; if he is still needed there. His disdain for the National Assembly surely makes him anti-democratic. In the alternative, I challenge him to contest in 2019 or forever remain silent.”

  • SAN’s frustrating corruption cases should be denied appearance in court – Sagay

    Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay has said senior advocates of Nigeria (SANs) frustrating high-profile corruption cases should be denied the right of appearance.

    Sagay said this on yesterday at a media roundtable organised by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) in Lagos.

    He said SANs have “turned obstruction and frustration of proceedings on high-profile corruption cases into an art.”

    “In cases requiring appeal, the authorities must apply for leave to appeal out of time, and prepare evidence and legal arguments thoroughly, including by inviting consultants to advise,” he said.

    “Prosecuting authorities must insist on full application of sections 306 and 396 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, namely: No stay of proceedings under any circumstances – S. 306. Any preliminary objection must be taken together with the substantive issue – S. 396(2), and hearings shall be on a daily basis, but in exceptional cases, adjournments not to be in excess of 14 working days, may be granted. Such adjournments not to exceed five in any proceedings – S. 396 (3) and (4).

    “A high court judge who is elevated whilst presiding over a criminal case should be allowed to conclude the case without any effect on his new status.

    “The heads of various courts in the country should be sensitised about the very critical nature of the fight against high-level official corruption to Nigeria’s development and the welfare of its peoples.

    “Pending the establishment of a special crimes court for the whole country, criminal divisions should be created in the federal and state high courts. Specially vetted and selected judges, known for integrity and self-discipline should be posted to man such courts.

    “All suspected proceeds of crime should be placed under temporary forfeiture during the trial of a high-profile person. Prosecuting authorities should resort to non-conviction based asset forfeiture, where proof beyond reasonable doubt is difficult to achieve because of technicalities.”

  • Sagay blasts Fayose over comments on Buhari, says ‘he’s an embarrassment to Nigeria’

    The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, PACAC, Prof. Itse Sagay, has lambasted Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State over comments credited to the governor on President Muhammadu Buhari’s health.

    Itse described Fayose as an “irresponsible clown who constitutes a national embarrassment”.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that Sagay made the claim while reacting to Fayose’s recent threat to release damaging photographs of President Muhammadu Buhari to prove that he is critically ill in London.

    Fayose, while addressing reporters had said, “If they go further and try to continue to deceive Nigerians, I will release about 11 damaging pictures anytime from now on the President’s health.”

    But, Sagay in his reaction to the statement cautioned the Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Governors Forum against his comments, saying he embarrasses himself and his position each time he speaks.

    Sagay said, “Fayose is an irresponsible clown. Given his age and position, he is an embarrassment to this country. Each time he opens his mouth, he reduces his non-existent esteem”.

    “He does have any esteem, so whenever he talks, he just reduces himself to nothingness. So, he is talking rubbish and should be ignored. I believe he has been ignored at the federal level. Let that continue.”

     

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that President Buhari traveled for medical check-up in London on Sunday, May 7, more than a month he came back into the country from a previous medical vacation.

  • Lawmaker who sponsored amnesty bill for looters should be punished – Sagay

    Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay has described the bill seeking to grant amnesty to self-confessed looters in the House of Representatives was disgraceful.

    In a statement on Wednesday, Sagay said the sponsor of the bill, Mr. Linus Okorie should be punished.

    “Now what shall we do with Linus Okorie? I propose that the House of Representatives should regard Linus’s bill to be so impertinent and scandalous as to earn him a suspension from the House, for the rest of the 8th session, i.e., until July 2019. That should serve notice that Nigeria will no longer tolerate such brazen impunity and corruption or its promotion thereof.”

    Sagay added that Okorie was promoting corruption through the bill.

    He added, “That a Nigerian legislator (a lawmaker) can have the effrontery to promote a bill which if enacted into law, will enable looters of our treasury and national patrimony to keep the loot, if only they can acknowledge it as looted, provided they undertake to spend it in Nigeria, is breathtaking.

    “In summary, what Mr. Okorie is encouraging is free plundering of state funds without consequences. Simply put, it is the legitimating of treasury plundering. It is clear that if such a bill becomes law, the anti-corruption war is doomed.

    “How do we punish this man for his total lack of morality, and his heedless, headlong promotion of looting without adverse consequences? I think people who come up with such shocking assaults on our common morality and sense of decency deserve a sharp rebuke coupled with sanctions.”

  • APC UK backs call for Sagay’s sack over failure to declare his asset

    The All Progressive Congress (APC), United Kingdom chapter has backed calls for Acting President Yemi Osinbajo to sack the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Anti-Corruption (PACAC), Professor Itse Sagay for failure to declare his assets at the CCB in accordance with the law.

    The APC UK chapter, which made its stand known on its official Twitter account, directly asked @PACAC , if asset declaration was limited to elected officials?
    The party also requested why Prof. Sagay is yet to declare his assets.

    Also contained in the APC UK tweet is a media report of a statement released by a pro-democracy group, National Committee of Yoruba Youths (NCYY), signed by its national president, Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi and made available to journalists, stated that Sagay evaded that constitutional responsibility on him to declare his assets.

    “The consequences of this illegality is for Professor Sagay to be sacked from office and be immediately prosecuted. “We, therefore, give the respected Acting President Yemi Osinbajo who is a Professor of Law and senior advocate to put a stop to this illegality within 48 hours. “We also call on the CCB to within 72 hours commence the prosecution of the PACAC chairman at its tribunal,” the group said.

    “We, therefore, give the respected Acting President Yemi Osinbajo who is a Professor of Law and senior advocate to put a stop to this illegality within 48 hours. “We also call on the CCB to within 72 hours commence the prosecution of the PACAC chairman at its tribunal,” the group said.

    The group further claimed that its investigation showed that tSagay’s circumvention of the law was known to the former board of the CCB headed by Mr Sam Saba and that the board deliberately covered up the act of omission only for the facts to become known now that the CCB has no board. “We are surprised and disappointed to find out that Sagay continues to go to equity with soiled hands. He is the one who is loudest about the anti-corruption fight of the government, yet he does not deem it fit to be transparent by declaring his assets as demanded by law.

    “We are surprised and disappointed to find out that Sagay continues to go to equity with soiled hands. He is the one who is loudest about the anti-corruption fight of the government, yet he does not deem it fit to be transparent by declaring his assets as demanded by law.

    “We are surprised and disappointed to find out that Sagay continues to go to equity with soiled hands. He is the one who is loudest about the anti-corruption fight of the government, yet he does not deem it fit to be transparent by declaring his assets as demanded by law.

  • Appeal of CCT judgment: I am unperturbed, bring it on! Saraki dares FG, Sagay

    Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki has said that he is “unperturbed” by the appeal filed by the federal government challenging his acquittal by the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT.

    TheNewsGuru.com reports that the CCT had on June 14 ruled that Saraki has no case to answer in the 18 charges of non-declaration of assets brought against him by the Federal Government.

    But in a swift reaction, the federal government expressed shock and insisted it will appeal the ruling saying the judgement was unreasonable.

    However, in a statement signed by his Special Adviser on Media and Public Affairs, Yusuph Olaniyonu, Mr. Saraki reiterated his earlier position that he remains unperturbed by the development.

    “Dr. Saraki is confident that the verdict at the appellate court would not be different from that of the tribunal as the facts of the case remain the same and the grounds on which the decision of the CCT was based remain unassailable.

    “Anybody who has been following the proceedings and the evidence given by the prosecution witnesses during examination in chief and cross-examination would know that if presented before any court of Justice and law, the same outcome as in the CCT would be arrived at.

    “Those who are running commentary on the ruling by the Tribunal and criticising it are those who are not even familiar with the case and the details coming out of the trial.

    “That is why Dr. Saraki continues to wonder how desperate some people in government and their collaborators outside have become to pull him down at all cost and by all means up to the point that they do not care if they destroy the institution of the judiciary in the process.

    “That is why they sponsored stories of allegation of bribery in an online publication against the Tribunal judges.

    “The Senate President seizes this opportunity to call on security agencies to immediately commence investigation on this bribery allegation.

    “This same desperation made a man like Prof. Itse Sagay, the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Anti-Corruption (PACAC) to appear on tape admitting in a foreign country that he interfered with the process in the Tribunal when in an unethical manner he was instructing the judge on how to conduct the trial.

    “Corruption is not just about giving or diverting money. When an official interferes with the judicial process with a view to achieving personal objectives, that is corruption.

    “We hear the same desperate people say there was so much evidence they are surprised at the verdict of the tribunal. But they forget to mention that this was a case that the prosecution counsel amended charges thrice.

    “If as it is being portrayed to the public it was a straight forward case following investigation how come every time their case was dismantled during the process they went back to amend charges just in desperation to get a conviction?

    “The Senate President notes that another sign of desperation by those who want to get him convicted at all cost was the failed antics of the prosecution counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacob who in collusion with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) sought to manipulate evidence at the tribunal.

    “On realising the fundamental flaw in its case as it did not invite the defendant to make any statement at any point in the investigation, the prosecution brought in an agent of the EFCC to tender old statements Saraki made in a totally different and unrelated matter that had nothing to do with false asset declaration. The prosecution forgot that the letter inviting Saraki to make the tendered statements explicitly mentioned the matter being investigated. However, the tribunal, as it is obvious in its ruling, saw through the dirty trick. It therefore disregarded that piece of evidence and described it as irrelevant and of no value to the case,” he said.

    Saraki noted that another sign of desperation is the involvement of the EFCC in a case that has to do with false declaration of asset and as such only concerns the Code of Conduct Bureau and its tribunal.

    He said that all evidences provided during the trial by CCT were all EFCC evidence adding that the CB chief prosecutor testified that he got his instruction to investigate the case orally.

    “He made his report from the investigation orally. Even the directive to ‘collaborate with EFCC’ on the investigation was given orally, a development the tribunal found strange and unknown to law. ‎

    “All these antics aimed at perverting the course of justice were obvious throughout the period of the tribunal’s sitting. Though, one is conscious of the fact that the anti- graft agency and its ally bodies are frantically looking for a poster-case to sell its anti-corruption campaign and there is the hunger for conviction in a celebrated case to advertise in the international arena government’s determination to pursue the anti-graft campaign, we implore them to achieve this aim by allowing Justice to take its normal course.

    “This Appeal against the CCT ruling is nothing but another attempt to grandstand and embark on another media trial without any substance. This is why the Senate President is sure it will be another exercise in futility.

    “Dr. Saraki has demonstrated his unflinching belief in and respect for the judicial process and its ability to resolve issues relating to fundamental rights of Nigerians. That belief in the judiciary is the basis for his assurance that the position of the CCT that he is not guilty of the charges preferred against him would be sustained in the higher courts,” his spokesperson said.

  • Sagay, Malami disagree over FG’s appeal of Saraki’s acquittal

    Discordant views from the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami and Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, on review of the federal government’s strategy in combatting corruption following the unexpected triumph of Senate President Bukola Saraki at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), highlight cracks in President
    Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade.

    Saraki had in the last 21 months been facing trial over false declaration of assets, but the tribunal last Wednesday ruled that he had no case to answer in the 18-point charge brought against him by the federal government.

    Following Saraki’s acquittal, there had been rumble among top echelons of government since the judgement was delivered with some calling for appeal while others are of the view that status quo ante should be maintained.

    However, The Federal Government yesterday appealed the court ruling that acquitted the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, of charges of corruption and false declaration of assets.

    The federal government through Rotimi Jacobs SAN and Pius Akutah, an assistant Chief State Counsel signed, filed eleven grounds of appeal at the Court of Appeal Abuja to challenge the judgment of the CCT.

    However, from a very reliable source, TheNewsGuru.com gathered that a strategic meeting earlier conveyed by some of the frontline Buhari’s anti-corruption aides in order to review the federal government’s strategy in combatting corruption reportedly ended up on a dead end road.

    The meeting was attended by Malami, Sagay and another legal aide in the presidency, Mr. Okoi Obno-Obla.

    Recall that Prof. Itse Sagay had condemned the acquittal saying there was no basis for the position taken by the tribunal, even as he stressed that the prosecution presented enough evidence to secure a conviction..

    In the same vein, the Special Assistant to the President on Prosecutions, Mr. Okoi Obono-Obla, also maintained Sagay’s position that government would appeal the judgement.

    Meanwhile, whereas while the duo are drummed for the appeal of the tribunal’s verdict, Malami, has a contradictory view.

    Malami, it was gathered had disclosed that he would need the advise of President Muhammadu Buhari before a decision on whether to appeal the case or not.

    He also said that FG has not appealed such case in the past and preceedent is law, since there is no such precedence in such high profile case it will be difficult to start it with Saraki’s case.

    At the meeting Malami was quoted as saying, “it is a fruitless journey; we are not willing to embark on that. If we can’t review judgement against Tinubu, then we cannot review case against Saraki as that will appear as double standard”

    When contacted, an aide to the Senate President told TheNewsGuru.com that: “They can go ahead with the appeal but it is just an abuse of court process and we will come out victorious any day.”

    Meanwhile, a chieftain of the All Progressive Congress (APC), in Abuja mentioned that a review of the judgement against Saraki will negatively affect the integrity of the APC.

    “If they can’t appeal the case against Tinubu, then why waste time appealing against Saraki. It is important that our party start thinking about its integrity or we will risk getting booted out in 2019.” The source added