Tag: southern

  • Southern, Middle Belt leaders call on Buhari to rescind decision to request for $800m loan

    Southern, Middle Belt leaders call on Buhari to rescind decision to request for $800m loan

    The Southern and Middle Belt Leaders Forum (SMBLF) has appealed to President Muhammadu Buhari to rescind his decision to request for the approval of $800 million loan from World Bank.

    Recall that just few days to leaving office, president Buhari wrote to the  Senate and House of Representatives to approve the loan request to finance the National Social Safety Network Programme.

    However, in their reaction, the Southern and Middle Belt Leaders said in a communiqué issued at the end of its meeting held in Abuja on Wednesday that the country’s indebtedness has reached the skies.

    The meeting, chaired by elder statesman

    One of the leaders, Edwin Clark, deliberated on the present state of affairs in Nigeria, especially the renewed siege of insecurity around the country, the ongoing post-election judicial process in the various tribunals and the national economy.

    The SMBLF restated “its time-tested position that the future of Nigeria can only be sustained on the basis of true federalism and respect for the autonomy of the federating units.

    “Expresses shock at the escalation of killings, pogroms, total destruction of entire communities and means of livelihood in several targeted areas in select states since after the 2023 General elections, mainly in Plateau, Benue, Nasarawa, Taraba, Southern Kaduna, Kebbi, and various states of the South East, where hundreds of armless citizens are being slaughtered daily.

    “Notes with grave concern that the nation’s security agencies have continued to show unwillingness to decisively deal with the perpetrators of these monstrous acts, or rather, deliberately turned a blind eye to the atrocious occurrences, thereby exposing the country to a seeming state of war. It is shameful that non-state actors are allowed to openly tote dangerous weapons about and rampage the country unhindered.

    “Condemns, in unmistakable terms, the cavalier and totally nonchalant attitudes of the outgoing governors of some states over the collapse of security in certain parts of their states, which has continued to exacerbate the worrisome situation, and hopes their successors will show greater commitment to the welfare of their citizens who are the victims of this sad situation.

    “Further warns that the continuous abdication of Government’s primary and abiding constitutional responsibility of safeguarding the lives and properties of its citizens is an irresistible signal to Nigerians to exercise their inalienable rights of self-defence, by all means.

    “Again deplores the inhuman plight of thousands of indigenous people in the Middle Belt states driven out of their homes and have now become Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) for years as well as several other Internally Displaced Persons in different parts of the country, left to live in conditions that impinge on their human rights as citizens of this country. Hence, calls on the Federal Government to, without any further delay, facilitate the return and reintegration of these Nigerians to their Communities.”

    Meanwhile, the Southern and Middle Belt leaders praised Nigerian youths for their courage and astuteness in expressing their interest in the future of this country and called on them not to become discouraged by some of the seeming outcomes.

    Southern, Middle BeltThe communiqué reads, “SMBLF strongly urges the Nation’s Judiciary to be aware that all Nigerians are watching with very keen interest the ongoing judicial processes at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal as well as various election tribunals across the country.

  • 2023: Disagreement between Northern, Southern governors over zoning unfortunate – Ganduje

    2023: Disagreement between Northern, Southern governors over zoning unfortunate – Ganduje

    Kano State governor, Abdullahi Umar Ganduje has said the disagreement between the northern and southern governors over the issue of presidential zoning is unfortunate and should never have happened.

    The governor said the issue of power shift is purely a political parties’ affair and not the business of state governors.

    He also reiterated that ranching remains the only solution to the herders/farmers clashes in the country.

    Ganduje spoke his mind on Friday in his address to mark Nigeria’s 61st Independence Anniversary held at the Sani Abacha Stadium, Kano. He also spoke to reporters in Government House, Kano, after the Independence parade.

    The governor, who said he was not happy with some of his counterparts for abusing one another over the issue of power shift as regards 2023 general election, advised that the unity of the country was paramount to all Nigerians.

    He said: “I will like to use this opportunity to call on the governors, the elite, religious and traditional leaders and all Nigerians to come together and be united, and ensure our unity grows from strength to strength.

    “The current disagreement between the northern and southern governors is unfortunate and it is not necessary.

    “The governors were elected not to divide Nigeria but to keep Nigeria one for progress and development. It is unfortunate that the two divides are exchanging uncomplimentary languages to each other; this is not civilised and is most unfortunate.”

    He called on the chairman of the Nigeria Governor’s’ Forum (NGF), Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State, to convene a meeting where all the governors will apologise to one another and reconcile for the peace of the country.

    Ganduje said: “The other issue causing dichotomy is the issue of power shift.

    “The constitution did not mention that power shall shift from north to south, but it has been a tradition by political parties in Nigeria to zone the presidency. And the zoning is a strategy by political parties to win election.

    “If you think power shift will bring you votes to win elections, you have not offended the constitution. If you think you can retain leadership of this country forever and win election, the constitution is not offended. So I think this issue should be left to political parties to resolve. Not we governors to have two opposing groups.”

    Governor Ganduje also kicked against open grazing, describing it as a crime. He pointed out that apart from the crisis brought by open grazing which often result in killings, the worst crime is that the herders are deprived the opportunity of acquiring western education or at least Islamic education.

    Ganduje said: “Another issue that has brought dichotomy is the issue of open grazing. Each state has the power to make laws and there is diversity in each of these states.

    “What is a problem to one state may not be a problem to another state. So, states have the powers with their state assemblies to make laws.

    “I have been saying it, it is unfortunate that this issue of open grazing has brought a lot of controversies.

    “Like I earlier said, trekking from the northern part of this country to the middle belt down to the south, to me is not acceptable, because the children will not be able to have education.

    “To me, it is criminal. Will the education system follow them along the routes from north to central to southern parts of this country? Can any educational system agree with that?

    “The other issue is that some of these herdsmen are from other West African countries. And because of climatic change, they move down to northern parts of this country to the Middle Belt and to the South with thousands of cattle and with arms.

    “Should that be acceptable to Nigeria? Can’t we take it to the ECOWAS, since it is creating problems?

    “So I think it is better to develop the ranching system where the herdsmen are confined to a place where they can have animal husbandry in the modern system.

    “That is why at the Dansoshiya Forest here in Kano we are creating the Ruga system where we provide water, housing units, markets, veterinary clinic, educational system and schools for the children so that they can also enjoy social developments like any other person in Nigeria.

    “I think that is the answer because now the issue is that as I have been saying herdsmen have not succeeded in killing poverty and poverty has not succeeded in killing herdsmen, because a man with thousands of cattle cannot be called a poor man; he moves with a mobile bank.

    “But there is no doubt somebody who treks from the north to the south cannot be called a rich man, looking at his shoes and his body you will understand.”

  • Nigeria in 1914: A tragedy of unification (1) – Godwin Etakibuebu

    Nigeria in 1914: A tragedy of unification (1) – Godwin Etakibuebu

    By Godwin Etakibuebu

    The unification of both the South and North Protectorate of Nigeria by the British was one monumental disaster. Not that it could have been anything different, given the foundation laid for a country – Nigeria, which was yet to come into existence. We need to know, and understand too, that the Nigeria brought into being; through the process of the 1914 amalgamation was just an extension of a fortified existing disastrous foundation.

    It is for this reason that many Nigerians would always get it wrong by thinking and concluding that 1914 was the issue with Nigeria. No, that cannot be, as 1914; with its watershed of amalgamation, remains part of the exodus story of a nation without defined place of anchorage, but it was not the genesis – if Genesis can be appropriately defined as the beginning.

    We need to seek out, and identify the place of genesis for the disaster; which was politically crowned in 1914, by the amalgamation which Colonel [later Lord] Frederick Lugard; a miserably disgruntled Colonel of the British Army [reason for him being miserable shall be further expatiated as we proceed in this exercise] presided over. But first, let us look at the events of the amalgamation and start a backward memory journey into a very long past; a past that shouldn’t be less than One Hundred years. If you are ready then let us role.

    What later became Nigeria was never a nation, country, tribe or even an ethnic nationality in the hands of anybody. But instead, a commodity – albeit a perishable commodity like tomatoes, onion, fish/meat, chairs and tables of low quality, or even second-hand clothing materials.
    And this “commodity”; which was not purchased, remained in the hands of some random traders of British nationalities. These traders later formed a company to be known as The Royal Niger Company, and took effective control of dominance over the “total territory” later to become Nigeria.

    It is for this reason that the first and former name given to the “conquered territory” was “The Royal Niger Company Territories”. It does not sound like a country name at all – the name Nigeria was replaced and preserved up until today. Still, it was not a name for a nation, but merely a name of the territory.

    It was the conglomeration of these traders that eventually sold their conquered territory, or call it Commodity, to the British Government in 1900, having taken effective command of the place from 1886 to 1899, at the cost of £865,000.

    The fact to be judiciously noted from this narration is the fact that Nigeria came into being through the instrumentality of trading; by the sellers, and at no time was consideration of the peoples’ goodwill and welfare given to those conquered –the aborigines or natives, as no name for identification was given them.

    Another thing worthy of consideration here is the fact that the instrument of conquering, holding together; through the mechanism of brutalization, and sales of the conquered people were all contrived by wicked foreigners – foreigners with the characteristic of brutality, most appropriate for demonic slave captors. Their [the foreign invaders] interest is purely woven around their economic survival and growth. Yet, this period was not exactly the beginning of Nigeria woes.

    It all began when the first set of sailors from Europe visited this territory to be later called Nigeria. And the first to arrive here were the Portuguese, under the leadership of a very professional Sailor; Captain Ruy-de Sequeira. He sailed into the Bight of Benin and came to anchorage in the Forcados River [a small quite town in present day Burutu Local Government Council of Delta State], and this was in 1472. It is strictly for the purpose of this voyage that shipping operations started in Nigeria in that year – 1472. This sailor, with his crew was not involved so much in political activities while in that territory, but strictly concentrated on shipping and merchandise.

    But same could not be said about the first British sailor to visit this territory – Nigeria. History had it that Captain Thomas Wyndham; arrived this territory in 1552, as the vessels; M/V Primrose, which was followed a few days later by M/V Lion, came into anchorage around the Eko [later to be named Lagos] waterfront. This sailor – Captain Thomas Wyndham, was said to have “vanished into the far hinterland of the territory for a lengthy time.” It could not be ascertained where the hinterland he vanished to was, those he met during the time of absence and the purpose of the vanishing into the hinderland.

    Another thing that could not be confirmed was which assignment he undertook first – between “vanishing to the hinterland” and sailing to the Bight of Benin, because he established evidence of meeting with the Oba of Benin then; His Highness, Oba Orhogbua, around 1553.

    The important import of this narration; of the visiting first British Sailor to this territory is the contact he was able to establish while he was alleged to have “vanished into the hinterland” of this territory. What he was able to achieve during the time he became nomadic in this territory, became materialized during another encounter between the British territorial conquerors; and the Fulani Jihadist; under the leadership of Othman dam Fodio, in early 1800 – an encounter that resulted into an “accord of relationship and terms of sharing the conquest”, between the two – the British colonialists and the Fulani jihadists.

    Details of that contract agreement between the Fulani and the British and the ameliorated manner it brought succour to the Northern Fulani/Hausa oligarchy, started unfolding in 1860 at a time the establishment of Police Force [first to be called Consular Constabulary – in 1861, and later to be changed to Hausa Constabulary in 1863] for this territory was muted.

    We just have to escape from the details of this narration, for sake of time and space as totality of the revelation’s trajectory are there in my incoming book – IN NIGERIA: THE VULTURES AND VAMPIRES ARE STILL FEEDING.

    Let us fast-track the narration to the events of 1914 – the year of the amalgamation, as this would prove the evidence of the colossal disaster of that event. We need to know that the amalgamation of 1914 wasn’t an idea that emanated from any of the two conquered territories – Northern and Southern Protectorates, but entirely enforced by the colonialists, and without any consideration for the interests of the occupants of the two territories.

    We should be getting details of facts about the amalgamation, the name [Nigeria] given to the territory, the British economic interest that forced the unification, the number of people that sat down and at the signing ceremony of the amalgamation and what the future of the amalgamated territories was likely to be, as planned by the foreign invaders.

    It is a journey that l should call voyage to discovery and it is a voyage laid with difficulties, if the truth must be told. It is going to be revelation of the fraud that represents the foundation of this land of oddities, called Nigeria. It is a journey, as torturous as it would prove to be, that we must take for the sake of posterity. Let us role on into episode 2 to continue the narration, please.

    Godwin Etakibuebu; a veteran Journalist, wrote from Lagos.
    Contact:
    Website: www.godwintheguru.com
    You Tube Channel: Godwin The Guru
    Twitter: @godwin_buebu
    Facebook: Godwin Etakibuebu
    Facebook Page: Veteran Column
    Phone: +234-906-887-0014 – short messages only.
    You can also listen to this author [Godwin Etakibuebu] every Monday; 9:30 – 11am on Lagos Talk 91.3 FM live, in a weekly review of topical issues, presented by The News Guru [TNG].

  • 2023: Southern/Middle Belt leaders demand power shift from North, total restructuring

    2023: Southern/Middle Belt leaders demand power shift from North, total restructuring

    The leaders from the southern region and the middle belt are demanding that the 2023 presidential slot be zoned to the south in the overall interest of Nigeria as a united country.

    The leader of the group, Chief Edwin Clark stated this on Sunday during a press conference in Abuja, describing the ongoing constitutional amendment exercise by the National Assembly, as fraudulent.

    He also insisted on a total restructuring of Nigeria and a brand new constitution fashioned after the 1963 constitution.

    “The South should be ready to have the next President, without that, no Nigeria. We want total restructure of Nigeria if there has to be a Nigeria to continue,” he said.

    “We want the zoning to continue, it is conventional. When the Constitution did not provide for a succession when Yar’ Adua was ill, the convention was adopted.

    “Even though zoning is not part of our 1999 Constitution or our party institution, it has been an acceptable convention.”

    The elder statesman said the country needs a brand-new constitution, adding that the 1963 Constitution recognised the country as a four-legged country where each region developed at its own pace, which was not the case in recent times.

    According to him, the situation of things is such that one state that is not developed would be dragging a developed state down.

    See the communique issued after the meeting of the Southern and Middle Belt Leaders’ Forum below:

    COMMUNIQUE ISSUED AT THE END OF AN EXPANDED MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN AND MIDDLE BELT LEADERS’ FORUM HELD ON SUNDAY, 30TH MAY, 2021

    An expanded Meeting of the Southern and Middle Belt Leaders Forum (SMBLF), held on Sunday, 30th May 2021, at the Sheraton Hotel and Towers, ABUJA. The Meeting, chaired by Elder statesman, Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark, OFR, CON, had, in attendance leaders of various socio-cultural organizations as follows: Afenifere, for the South West; Ohanaeze Ndigbo, for the South East; Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), for the South-South and the Middle Belt Forum (MBF), for the Middle Belt.

    1. The Meeting also had in attendance, former Governors, Ministers and Members of the National Assembly, from the respective Zones (list attached).
    2. The Meeting exhaustively discussed various issues about the State of Affairs in the country, particularly, bordering on the Security, National Dialogue, Restructuring, and the preparations for the 2023 General Elections.
    3. Arising therefrom, the Meeting resolved as follows:
    4. Urges the Federal Government to heed the genuine and reasonable nationwide calls for a transparent National Dialogue, and take urgent steps towards restructuring and birthing a new Constitution; to bring back equitable harmony to the Country;
    5. Insists that it is imperative to immediately restructure the country considering the precarious prevailing atmosphere before any further elections.

    iii. Reminds all leading political parties, especially the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and other political parties, that the basis of any viable democracy, especially in a diverse and complex country such as Nigeria, rests in fair and even sharing of power;

    1. Notes that the Northern part of the Country would have fully enjoyed the Office of the Presidency, for the full statutory period of 8 years by 2023, hence, should yield to the South;
    2. Therefore, the Meeting:
    3. Unequivocally and in full resolve, calls on the APC and PDP and other political parties to zone the Presidency, in 2023 to the South; at the next election.
    4. Enjoins political stakeholders from the South not to be lured into the unpatriotic step of seeking such other positions as National Chairmen and Vice President of the main political parties, but join forces to demand and ensure that the Presidency moves to the South in 2023;

    iii. Calls on the Federal Government to declare a national emergency on security and urgently come up with proactive strategies to restore peace and security to all parts of the country;

    1. Emphasizes that, if the security situation is not dealt with and banditry stopped or reduced to the barest minimum, it would not be feasible to have proper elections in 2023;
    2. Condemns the cavalier attitude of the federal government towards the resolutions of the Governors of Southern States at their Meeting, held in Asaba, Delta State on 11th May 2021;as it pertains to ban on open grazing and restructuring.
    3. Insists that cattle rearing is a generally, private business enterprise, as such, the Federal Government should avoid committing state resources to promote any particular business, beyond providing the enabling environment, in the performance of its regulatory roles;

    vii. Extends condolences to the families of the late Chief of Army Staff, Lt. General Ibrahim Attahiru, and 10 other military personnel, who died in the unfortunate military plane crash on 21st May 2021, and calls on the military authorities to carry out a thorough investigation to ascertain the actual cause of the crash;

    viii. Reaffirms its commitment to the unity of Nigeria, but must only be sustained on the principles of Equity, Fairness and Justice.

    1. The Meeting was held in an atmosphere of peace and collective commitment to the decisions.
    2. Done in ABUJA, this 30th Day of May 2021.

     

    Signed:

     

    Chief E. K. Clark, OFR, CON – Leader

    Chief Ayo Adebanjo – Leader, Afenifere

    Amb. Prof George Obiozor – President General, Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide

    Dr. Pogu Bitrus – National President, Middle Belt Forum

    Senator Emmanuel Ibok Essien, FNSE, National Chairman PANDEF.

  • JUST IN: Southern, Northern Kaduna agree to split into two new states

    JUST IN: Southern, Northern Kaduna agree to split into two new states

    The Christians, Non-Hausa/Fulani from the Southern part of Kaduna state and its rival Northern Muslim Hausa/Fulani dominated part of Northern Kaduna, have agreed for the split of Kaduna State into two new states.

    Speaking during the presentation and defence of their memos at the Senate ad-hoc Committee and the House of Reps Special Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution at the Hassan Katsina House on Wednesday who has been engaged in infamous inter-ethnic and religious clashes for decades, said creating new states from the present Kaduna State will go a long way at solving the bloody violence that seemed to defy solution.

    The President of the Southern Kaduna Peoples Union (SOKAPU), Hon. Jonathan Asake, who defended the memo of Southern Kaduna people said: “The wish of Southern Kaduna is to have a brand new constitution, not an amended one,” he said.

    “But in the absence of that, we are here to make our inputs as a people who have suffered suppression and oppression for a long time,” he said.

    “Southern Kaduna is made up of 67 ethnic nationalities spread in 13 of the 23 Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Kaduna state. It has a landmass of 26,000kmsq with an estimated population of 5.1 million. We are endowed with an educated population and with abundant natural resources,” he said.

    “Our land size is greater than that of Kano state which has a landmass of 20,000kmsq. Yet Kano is a state of its own with 44 LGAs. Our population is greater than 21 other states of the federation,” he went on. “We are demanding for the amendment of the provision of section 8 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which makes it almost an impossible task for the creation of a new state,” he insisted.

    “We have been demanding for a state of our own for over thirty years and Gurara state was among the 18 states proposed in the 2014 Confab report,” he said.

    “We are demanding for the creation of the Gurara state after the amendment. This will help in solving the incessant conflicts between our people and the other divide,” he said.

    SOKAPU also asked for the removal of the Land Use Act from the Constitution and its amendment as a law, so that communities and families can have larger control of the ancestral lands.

    “We stand by all the 2014 confab report which had captured most of our demands.

    In the same vein, the Northern part of Kaduna State, under the aegis of Kaduna Development Elders Initiatives submitted a memo signed by the Senators Representing Kaduna North Senatorial Zone, Sen. Sulieman Abdu Kwari; the Senator Representing Kaduna Central Senatorial zone, Senator Uba Sani; all the House of Reps members from the Northern Part of Kaduna; all members of Kaduna state house of Assembly from the northern part of Kaduna their Chairmen of LGAs and Councillors.

    Defending the memo of the group, Abdulkadir Ahmed said, “we are canvassing for the creation of New Kaduna state from the present Kaduna state and we want the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria amended to make this possible.”

    “Kaduna South has been complaining of marginalisation ever since, even though Chiefdoms have been given to them and they occupy 60% of the workforce of Kaduna state,” he added.

    “Let the state be split and if they are asking for Gurara state, let them have it,” he said.

    “This will solve all the crises we have been having in this state,” he added.

    “On our part, we are asking for the creation of ‘New Kaduna State’, which will include Kaduna North and Kaduna Central Senatorial zones,” he said.

    “But there should be a referendum for each section of the state to decide on where it wants to belong,” he added.

    Governor Nasir el-Rufai of Kaduna State, who declared the meeting open, also asked for true Federalism, State Police and Financial Autonomy to Local Government Councils.

    The Chairman of the Committee, Senator Kabiru Gaiya from Kano State, in his opening remarks assured all that each of the memos will be well looked into and submitted to the National Assembly for further actions.

    Many groups and individuals also submitted memos as the sitting continues till Friday.

  • Enough is enough of this killing spree in Southern Kaduna – Sultan

    Enough is enough of this killing spree in Southern Kaduna – Sultan

    Chairman of the Northern Traditional Rulers Council and Sultan of Sokoto, Dr. Sa’ad Abubakar III, has condemned the killings in the Southern part of Kaduna State, describing the incidence as a “madness that must stop immediately.”

    Speaking yesterday at the opening of a meeting of the Northern Traditional Rulers Council in Kaduna, the Sultan called on sponsors of the killings to stop the dastardly act, declaring “enough is enough.”

    He said “no man in his right senses will go on a killing spree of innocent people under whatever guise.”

    The monarch, who accused politicians of fuelling the crisis, also called on Nigerians not to allow themselves to be used.

    He said any politician who ignites violence does not mean well for the people and called on the people to shun such politicians.

    “You keep on igniting killings based on ethno-religious differences because it is the innocent children that are killed while those of the elites are protected,” he said.

    Earlier, Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir el-Rufai, had said the Southern Kaduna crisis had lingered on for the past 40 years since the first Kasuwan Magani riot in Kajuru Local Government Area in 1980.

    “Kaduna is a mini-Nigeria with over 52 ethnic groups, meaning that 10 per cent of Nigeria’s ethnic groups are from Kaduna State.

    “The danger of it is that crimes committed by criminals for their own selfish motives are given ethno-religious interpretations,” the governor said.

    He added that his administration has been striving to stop the killings, citing the location of a military base and a mobile police depot in the area as well as the deployment of the Air Force and Strike Force personnel as part of measures to stop the killings.

    According to him, equipment like drones and GSM trackers are being used and had helped to neutralise thousands of the bandits in the state.

    After the opening ceremony, the meeting went into a closed-door session.

  • IG disagrees with CAN over number of people killed in Southern Kaduna crises

    IG disagrees with CAN over number of people killed in Southern Kaduna crises

    Abuja – The Inspector-General of Police (IG), Mr Ibrahim Idris, has disagreed with the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), on the number of people killed in the Southern Kaduna crises.

    The Catholic Archdiocese of Kafanchan had alleged that the unrest in Southern Kaduna had claimed over 808 lives, in 53 villages in the area.

    But Idris disputed the claim in Abuja on Sunday at the New Year dinner organised by the Nigeria Police Force for its personnel.

    He stressed the need for religious, community and political leaders to be patriotic in their endeavors for peace to reign in the country.

    The IG cautioned Nigerians to avoid unnecessary tension which could lead to destruction of lives and property. He said that Nigerians had no other country than Nigeria, hence the need to do those things that would bring peace and unity to the country.

    Idris advised Nigerians to live in peace with one another in spite of religious and ethnic differences. He commended officers and men of the force for their commitment to providing security to all Nigerians across the country.

    Idris restated the Nigeria Police Force’s commitment to providing adequate security without bias to any section of the country.