Tag: Supreme Court

  • 13% derivation: Niger Govt drags AGF to Supreme Court

    13% derivation: Niger Govt drags AGF to Supreme Court

    The Niger State government has dragged the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to the Supreme Court over its omission from the 13 per cent derivation.

    In an originating summons sighted at the apex court, the Niger government, through its counsel Mohammed Ndarani, SAN, seeks the interpretation and application of section 232 (1) & (2) of the Nigerian constitution.

    The suit seeks the inclusion of Niger state in the 13 per cent derivation as enshrined in the Enactment of Allocation of Revenue (Federation Account, etc.) Act, 2004.

    The state wants the court to determine whether Niger State does not qualify to be classified among the states that produce natural resources and therefore entitled to 13 per cent derivation within the meaning of 162(2) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The subject matter of the suit is the failure of the federal government to include Niger among the beneficiary states of the 13 per cent derivation.

    It is also about the omission of remitting same proceeds of fiscal revenue generated and accrued through Hydroelectric Power dams in Niger, the territory and part of the resources of Niger to the overall electricity generation to the national grid in Nigeria since 1968 till date.

    Ndarani argued that the State hosts four major hydroelectricity dams: Kainji, Jebba, Shiroro and Zungeru, which serves as a power house for electricity supply to various states in the country.

    He also said that through these power stations, the Federal Government extends electricity supply to the Republics of Niger, Benin, Togo.

    He averred that the attorney-general was brought before the apex court because he has an oversight legal advice function over advising and representing the Accountant-General.

    The Accountant-General has the constitutional role of preparing the Nation’s Financial Statements arising from collection and receipts of income, fees, rentals and taxes and payment out of the Federation Account.

    That the attorney general at all times is charged with legally advising and representing the Auditor-General of the Federation and the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission that oversees revenue accruing to, and disbursement of such funds from the Federation Account.

    He said that the defendant represents and advises the president on all legal matters involving the functions of the president but has failed over the years in its duties.

    This, according to him, should have been to ensure an equitable distribution of resources in conformity with the current realities, particularly, in relation to the enormous fiscal revenue generated by Niger.

    The learned silk averred to the fact that Niger is a purely agrarian state as the inhabitants are subsistence farmers whose produce are enjoyed across the state and beyond.

    He noted that as a result of the large expanse of the land occupied by the dams, a large population of the citizens and residents of Niger are denied the opportunity of engaging in agricultural activities.

    He said that Niger, host to the dams, which were established in 1968 and have laid the golden eggs, has been a victim of incessant and continuous flooding in recent years and still counting.

    This has resulted in wanton loss of human lives and livestock as well as destruction of properties, leading unavoidably to displacement of many residents from their homes.

    He claimed that Physicochemical/Microbiological Impact Assessment Report conducted by the state government showed the level of degradation in the affected areas.

    This represents an impending danger for the state over the coming years if urgent environment protection measures are not taken.

    To the chagrin, detriment, continuous exploitation and utter impoverishment of the people of Niger, the defendant continuously and continually whisked off profits from the state.

    The federal government should not be only concerned about benefiting from the dams located in the territory of the state without a care for its people.

    He said that unfortunately the office of National Bureau of Statistics had no information on the volume of electricity by megawatts generated by the dams since 1968 and 2019, except for those of 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.

    They gave the NBS’s computation of the volume of electricity by megawatts generated into the national grid from 2020 – 2023 as follows:

    “The sum total megawatt generated in 2020 is equal to 2,232,706.27, 2021 equal to 2,632,348.00, 2022 equal to 2,830,002.96 and in 2023 equal to 2,658,612.96.

    These dams have generated fiscal revenue which has been controlled by the federal government and have been indisputably redistributed equally among the constituent states without considering the host state since 1968.

    Ndarani stated that Niger and its citizens and residents suffer continuous exploitation, neglect and ravaging flood owing to the power generating activities of the federal government and its agencies.

    Conversely, the federal government continues to enjoy the profits from the dams, leaving the state in penury and misery.

    He added that the pitiable, miserable and hopeless plight of the Niger indigenes and residents alike cannot be over emphasised.

    In spite of all these, the federal government has also not paid attention to the adverse environmental impacts of the activities of the power generating companies at the dams.

    He said that not even the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA), has put any programme in place to ameliorate the sufferings of the people of the state.

  • Supreme Court judgement: Wike, APC chair hail Okpebholo

    Supreme Court judgement: Wike, APC chair hail Okpebholo

    Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mr  Nyesom Wike, has hailed the Supreme Court judgment, affirming the victory of Gov. Monday Okpebholo of Edo, in the September 2024 governorship election.

    Wike hailed the judgment in a statement signed by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Mr Lere Olayinka, in Abuja on Thursday.

    The Supreme Court on Thursday, upheld the victory of Sen. Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the governorship election in the state.

    A five-member panel of the apex court, in a unanimous judgment held that the appellants – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the election, Asue Ighodalo – failed to establish their case with sufficient and credible evidence.

    Reacting, the minister described the judgment as a final confirmation of the mandate freely given to the governor by the people of Edo.

    He urged Okpebholo to remain focused and see the victory as a further call to selfless service to the people of Edo.

    “This victory is for the people of Edo, who elected Okpebholo. It is a call for greater commitment to the service of the people.

    “I congratulate the governor and urge him to keep doing his best for the upliftment of his people,” he said.

    Wike also urged the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Asue Ighodalo, to join hands with Okpebholo to  develop the state.

    The minister said: “Now that a final answer has been provided as to the question of who actually won the governorship election, it behoves all opponents of the governor to, in the interest of Edo people, join hands with him.”

    Edo guber election: APC chair hails Supreme Court judgment

    Meanwhile, Jarret Tenebe, Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Edo Chapter has lauded the Supreme Court judgement, affirming Gov. Monday Okpebholo’s election.

    In a statement issued shortly after the judgment on Thursday in Abuja, Tenebe expressed gratitude to the judiciary and the electorate, describing the judgment as a “confirmation of the people’s will.”

    According to him, the judgment marks a “double celebration” for him as it coincided with his daughter’s graduation.

    “I am so happy today because the judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the election of Gov. Monday Okpebholo came the same day as my little girl Somi’s graduation. It is a double celebration for me,” Tenebe stated.

    The APC chairman commended Edo voters, whom he credited with securing the administration’s ongoing development efforts.

    “If not for them, we would not be getting the development we are experiencing today. Now, the state will witness even more progress under Gov. Okpebholo,” he said.

    Tenebe also praised the judiciary, sayiing that it had truly proven to be the last hope of the common man.

    “Edo people are the common man,” he said.

  • Supreme Court judgement: Mixed reactions trail Okpebholo’s victory

    Supreme Court judgement: Mixed reactions trail Okpebholo’s victory

    Former  Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State has described the judicial validation of the 2024 governorship election held in Edo as a grave danger to Nigeria’s democracy.

    In a statement issued on Thursday in Benin, Obaseki reacted to the Supreme Court judgment that affirmed Monday Okpebholo as the duly elected governor of Edo.

    According to him, the matter will be left in God’s hands, expressing faith that only God knows the right time and way to deliver justice and redemption to the people of Edo.

    “I am profoundly grateful to the good people of Edo State and Nigerians for their overwhelming support accorded our party, PDP.

    “And Its candidate, Dr Asue Ighodalo and his running mate, Osarodion Ogie, who we believed won the Edo Governorship Election, which took place on Sept. 21, 2024.

    “It is based on this conviction and our belief that the results were manipulated that we took steps to seek legal redress.

    “Beginning with the election petition tribunal, then the Court of Appeal, and finally, the Supreme Court. But unfortunately, and most surprisingly, all the courts have ruled against us.

    “Although we strongly disagree with the decision of the Supreme Court, but as adherents to the rule of law, we are bound by their verdict,” he said.

    He said: “We want to caution that the iconic manner in which the election was manipulated, coupled with the judicial validation it has received, portends grave danger for Nigeria’s democracy.”

    Obaseki, however,  encouraged Edo people to keep hope alive as they persisted in the struggle to redeem their fatherland.

    Tinubu urges Okpebholo to leverage Supreme Court victory for accelerated devt

    Meanwhile, President Bola Tinubu has congratulated Gov. Monday Okpebholo of Edo on his Supreme Court victory, urging him to use it as a boost to fast-track development in the state.

    ‎This is contained in a statement issued by Presidential Spokesperson, Mr Bayo Onanuga on Thursday in Abuja.

    ‎Tinubu welcomed the court’s verdict as a boost for governance, urging the governor to be magnanimous in victory and unite all Edo citizens behind a shared vision for progress.

    “Now that the governor has cleared the legal hurdles, it is time for him to accelerate the delivery of exceptional services and good governance to the people of Edo State, which he has already begun to do,” Tinub said.

    ‎He also congratulated the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Edo, calling for unity and commitment to the people’s mandate.

    In a unanimous decision by a five-member panel led by Justice Mohammed Garba, the apex court dismissed as lacking in merit, an appeal the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Asuerinme Ighodalo, filed to nullify the outcome of the governorship election held in the state on Sept. 21, 2024.

    According to the Supreme Court, it found no reason to set aside the concurrent judgments of both the Court of Appeal and the Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, which returned Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress, APC, as the valid winner of the gubernatorial contest.

    It noted that the Appellant failed to adduce credible and admissible evidence to substantiate his claim that the election was marred by irregularities that included over-voting and substantial non-compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act.

    Likewise, it held that the Appellant failed to call relevant witnesses to demonstrate some of the evidence he tendered in support of his case, especially the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System, BVAS, machines.

    Supreme Court judgment a call to higher service – Okpebholo

    Reacting, Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo on Thursday described the Supreme Court judgment affirming his election as a higher call to service and unity of the state.

    The Supreme Court on Thursday affirmed Okpebholo as the duly elected governor in the Sept. 2024, Edo governorship election.

    In a statement in Benin, Okpebholo noted that the victory signalled the beginning of a fresh chapter rooted in unity, inclusiveness, and accelerated development.

    He extended profound gratitude to the judiciary for its courage and commitment to justice.

    Okpebholo emphasised his commitment to lead with humility, compassion, and accountability.

    “My administration remains fully committed to its developmental blueprint prioritising security, infrastructure, education, agriculture, healthcare, youth empowerment, and job creation.

    “The focus remains clear to deliver tangible benefits that uplift lives and restore confidence in public leadership.

    Okpebholo, however, extended the olive branch to all his opponents, adding that the elections were over governance, and the healing process must begin.

    He urged political leaders across party lines to rise above division, and contribute constructively to the task of building a greater Edo.

    “Constructive criticism and diverse perspectives will always be welcomed, but they must be rooted in a sincere desire to see Edo thrive.

    “Edo belongs to all of us. The time has come to set aside our differences, close ranks, and march forward united in purpose and anchored in peace.

    Edo poll: I feel betrayed by Supreme Court judgment – Ighodalo

    Mr Asue Ighodalo, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s Candidate in the September 2024 governorship election in Edo, says he feels a deep sense of betrayal in the Supreme Court judgment delivered today.

    ‎Ighodalo, in his reaction to the apex court verdict, on Thursday, said though he accepted the finality of the judgment, “I do not and cannot pretend that what was delivered amounts to justice.”

    ‎He spoke in a statement he personally signed and a copy made available to NAN in Abuja.

    “My dear people of Edo State, today, the Supreme Court has ruled. What happened in the September 2024 Governorship Election was not a contest.

    “It was a robbery. Coordinated. Deliberate. And now, tragically validated by the highest court in the land.

    “While I will not and can not obstruct any judicial pronouncement, no matter how flawed, I must never fear to speak truth to power,” he said.

    According to him, like you, I feel a deep sense of betrayal.

    “Not just by those who rigged the process, but by the very institutions we trusted to protect our democracy. You came out in hope. You voted tor competence, for progress, for prosperity. And now, we are told that your voice does not matter.

    “That your freely given mandate can be trampled without consequence. I feel your pain. I share your anger. And I will never forget your courage. To every young person who saw in this moment the birth of a new Edo.

    “To every elder who longed to see our state rise again. To every woman and man who prayed, campaigned, and voted. We may not have won the office, but we won something greater. We found one another. We discovered our collective strength. Though this painful chapter closes today, our beautiful story does not end,” he said.

    Ighodalo, however, said that he would not relent in his effort at ensuring a better Edo.

    The struggle to reclaim the soul of our beloved state continues.

    “Yes, dark days may lie ahead. The weight of this illegitimacy will, unfortunately, echo beyond the halls of the Supreme Court.

    “I fear Edo will feel it in the absence of leadership, in the poverty of policy, and in the daily suffering of her people.

    “But we are neither a fearful nor a broken people. We may be wounded. But all wounds heal. So let this be our vow. We will not retreat. We will not be silenced. And we will never forget,” he said.

    ‎The PDP candidate, therefore, advised Gov. Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the winner of the election, to govern the state aright.

    “To those who now hold power undeserved, lead with humility. Govern with conscience. History sees what the courts may not. And one day, it will deliver its own verdict,” he concluded.

    Edo PDP accepts Supreme Court judgment with “respect, grace, and dignity”

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Edo on Thursday said it has accepted the Supreme Court judgment on the 2024 governorship election with utmost respect, grace, and dignity.

    Dr Anthony Aziegbemi, Chairman of the Edo PDP Caretaker Committee, stated this in Benin while reacting to the court’s decision affirming Monday Okpebholo as the governor of Edo .

    “We have come to the end of a long legal journey, culminating in the judgment of the Supreme Court,” he said.

    “As a party that believes in the rule of law and the democratic process, we have received the decision of the Court with the utmost respect.

    “Though the judgment did not go in our favour, we accept it with grace and dignity. The Supreme Court has spoken, yes, but the Supreme God, the Almighty remains the final and ultimate judge.

    “He speaks for the people. He sees the intentions of hearts, the desires of the people of Edo , and the direction in which they truly wish to go,” he said.

    He noted that Nigeria’s democracy was still a work in progress, adding that the moment was a reminder of how far Nigeria had come and how much farther it must go.

    Aziegbemi added that the party remained hopeful that one day, democratic institutions would fully reflect the genuine will of the people without fear, favour or manipulation.

    He thanked Edo for their courage, faith, and trust in the PDP, saying that the party might not have received the verdict hoped for but were not defeated.

    “We are not discouraged. Our cause is just, and our commitment to good governance, justice, and development remains strong.

    “Let it be known that this is not the end. This is only another chapter in our shared journey toward a better Edo and a better Nigeria.

    “We will continue to engage, organise, and serve with integrity and purpose. To all our supporters across the state and beyond, stay peaceful, united, and remain hopeful.

    “History is not written in a day, and no judgment can erase the love you have shown us or the bond we share as a political family,” he added.

    He emphasised that the PDP in Edo would continue to stand as a voice for the voiceless, a shield for the vulnerable, and a platform for progressive change.

    Gov. Abiodun congratulates Okpebholo on victory at Supreme Court

    Governor Dapo Abiodun of Ogun has described the Supreme Court’s validation of the election result of Sen. Monday Okpebholo as the governor of Edo as well-deserved.

    The governor congratulated Okpebholo, in a statement on Thursday in Abeokuta by Mr Kayode Akinmade, the Special Adviser on Information and Strategy to Gov. Abiodun.

    According to Abiodun, who  is also the Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum (SGF), the verdict has laid to rest the insinuations that the victory of Okpebholo at the election was an unexpected stroke of good luck.

    He said that with the apex court’s verdict, the Edo governor now had the opportunity to devote full attention to actualise his agenda for the state.

    He said : “On behalf of my brothers in the Southern Governors’ Forum (SGF), I heartily welcome the verdict of the Supreme Court that affirmed what the Edo people and Nigerians have known all along,

    “The verdict shows that, as announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and earlier validated by the Election Petitions Tribunal and the Court of Appeal, the legitimacy of Governor Okpebholo’s mandate cannot be questioned.

    “No doubt, this victory is a great news for democracy in Nigeria, for the people of Edo and for our great party, the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    “Democracy may be imperfect, but it represents the best form of government available to us as a people, and there is no doubt that this victory further consolidates and strengthens democracy in Nigeria.

    “Significantly, the victory represents the arrival of good things for the great people of Edo State and Nigeria as a whole

    “I have no doubt that the expectations of the people will be fully met by the pro-people, focused, and dynamic government of my dear brother, Governor Monday Okpebholo.”

  • It was a robbery, feel betrayed by Supreme Court judgment – PDP’s Ighodalo

    It was a robbery, feel betrayed by Supreme Court judgment – PDP’s Ighodalo

    Mr Asue Ighodalo, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s Candidate in the September 2024 governorship election in Edo, says he feels a deep sense of betrayal in the Supreme Court judgment delivered today.

    ‎Ighodalo, in his reaction to the apex court verdict, on Thursday, said though he accepted the finality of the judgment, “I do not and cannot pretend that what was delivered amounts to justice.”

    ‎He spoke in a statement he personally signed and a copy made available to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja.

    ‎”My dear people of Edo State, today, the Supreme Court has ruled.

    ‎”What happened in the September 2024 Governorship Election was not a contest.

    ‎”It was a robbery. Coordinated. Deliberate. And now, tragically validated by the highest court in the land.

    ‎”While I will not and can not obstruct any judicial pronouncement, no matter how flawed, I must never fear to speak truth to power,” he said.

    ‎According to him, like you, I feel a deep sense of betrayal.

    ‎”Not just by those who rigged the process, but by the very institutions we trusted to protect our democracy.

    ‎”You came out in hope. You voted tor competence, for progress, for prosperity.

    ‎”And now, we are told that your voice does not matter.

    ‎”That your freely given mandate can be trampled without consequence.

    ‎”I feel your pain. I share your anger. And I will never forget your courage.

    ‎”To every young person who saw in this moment the birth of a new Edo.

    ‎”To every elder who longed to see our state rise again.

    ‎”To every woman and man who prayed, campaigned, and voted.

    ‎”We may not have won the office, but we won something greater.

    ‎”We found one another. We discovered our collective strength.

    ‎”Though this painful chapter closes today, our beautiful story does not end,” he said.

    ‎Ighodalo, however, said that he would not relent in his effort at ensuring a better Edo.

    ‎”The struggle to reclaim the soul of our beloved state continues.

    ‎”Yes, dark days may lie ahead. The weight of this illegitimacy will, unfortunately, echo beyond the halls of the Supreme Court.

    ‎”I fear Edo will feel it in the absence of leadership, in the poverty of policy, and in the daily suffering of her people.

    ‎”But we are neither a fearful nor a broken people. We may be wounded. But all wounds heal.

    ‎”So let this be our vow. We will not retreat. We will not be silenced. And we will never forget,” he said.

    ‎The PDP candidate, therefore, advised Gov. Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the winner of the election, to govern the state aright.

    ‎”‘To those who now hold power undeserved, lead with humility.

    ‎”Govern with conscience. History sees what the courts may not.

    ‎”And one day, it will deliver its own verdict,” he concluded

  • Supreme Court judgement: Gov Otti defends Abia LG law

    Supreme Court judgement: Gov Otti defends Abia LG law

    Governor Alex Otti of Abia State has said the recently enacted Abia Local Government (LG) Law aligns with the spirit and objective of the Supreme Court judgment on local government autonomy.

    Otti said this on Thursday night during his monthly media parley with newsmen at the Government House, Umuahia, dubbed “Gov. Alex Otti speaks to Abians”.

    According to him, laws must be interpreted and implemented in ways that promote effective governance.

    He argued that the objective of Abia LG Law focuses on enhancing and not hindering service delivery in the various local government areas of the state.

    Otti also said that the state’s new law was designed to ensure that the objectives of the Supreme Court judgment would be practically achievable, without creating dysfunction.

    “The Supreme Court judgment has an intention, and the intention of any law is not to ensure a breakdown of service.

    “The Supreme Court actually made a law by that judgment and whatever we did with the law we passed was to ensure that the intended objective of that law is achieved,” he said.

    He further said that expecting local government councils to handle critical responsibilities, such as the payment of teachers, primary healthcare workers, and managing local security, without state assistance could make some local governments unviable.

    “It would be irresponsible for sub-nationals to fold their hands and watch, because local governments make up the state, just like states make up the federation,” he said.

    He emphasised that the law was not in conflict with the Supreme Court judgment but seeks to ensure smooth, practical implementation of local government functions.

    “What we tried to do is to ensure that it is implementable without creating hitches,” the governor said.

    Otti also said that, “in essence, the law aims to improve the efficiency of governance at the grassroots level and effectively meet the needs of Abia citizens”.

    The country’s apex court, on July 11, delivered a judgment granting financial autonomy to local government councils.

  • Supreme Court’s travesty on Sunday Jackson – By Pius Mordi

    Supreme Court’s travesty on Sunday Jackson – By Pius Mordi

    By Pius Mordi 

    Sunday Jackson is a farmer in his community in Adamawa State. While working in his farm sometime in 2020, he was attacked by a Fulani man who posed as a herdsman.

    Characteristic of his ilk, Ardo Buba Bawuro, the herder, was armed with a machete with the intention to kill Jackson, dealing several blows on him. But Jackson was better and smarter.

    Despite bleeding from the two cuts he sustained, he managed to disarm Bawuro and dealt him fatal blows. Bawuro died from his injury while Jackson survived.

    When Police intervened, Jackson was arrested and the Adamawa Director of Prosecution deemed that Jackson had committed murder and charged him to court with murder. He admitted that he fought back on being attacked by Bawuro who died from the altercation.

    Justice Fatima Ahmed Tafida who sat over the case upheld the prosecution’s argument that Jackson committed murder and sentence him to death. In her view, Jackson should have run away rather than fight Bawuro.

    Strangely, the Court of Appeal upheld the Justice Fatima Ahmed Tafida’s judgement. If the appeal court’s ruling was strange, that of the Supreme Court was baffling. The apex court agreed that Jackson should have run away rather than fight back.

    For daring to stand his ground on his farm and fight to stay alive, the Supreme Court ordered that Jackson should die. Yes, he is about the only one who survived a violent attack by an herdsman.

    And for successfully fighting back and staying alive while his attacker died from his injuries, the lordships in Supreme Court ruled on March 7, 2025 that Jackson should die.

    The judicial assassination of a survivor of a farmer whose only crime is that he had the audacity to fend off an attack by a Fulani and even kill him in the process had attracted global attention, especially legal experts.

    Having established that Jackson was the victim of an audacious attack in his farm, extant laws which recognise the right of individuals to fight back say Jackson only engaged in self defence.

    Rather, Justice Fatima Tafida chose to misinterpret Section 23 of the Adamawa State Penal Code Laws to mean that Jackson should have fled and not fight in self-defense.

    Besides, the judgement of the Adamawa High Court was said to have been given well outside the 90 days provided in the constitution after the adoption of final written addresses of counsel to the prosecution and the defence for judgement to be given.

    After the prosecution concluded its argument and Jackson testified for himself on February 27, 2020, the case was adjourned to August 27, 2020 for the adoption of final written addresses of counsel to the prosecution and the defence.

    Between the adoption of written addresses by counsel to both parties and the February 10, 2021 date of judgement by Justice Tafida, 167 days had elapsed.

    Given the time lapse, Ngozi Molokwu, CEO of Injustice Is Real, questioned the credibility of the judgement.

    “This clearly proves that due to the prolonged period of time from close of arguments to the rendering of judgment – a whopping 167 days – almost double the constitutional 90 days – the judge had confused the facts of the case resulting in a horrendous miscarriage of justice and as such it must be voided”, said Emmanuel Ogebe, and attorney and international human rights advocate.

    He said that from prosecution’s brief of argument, it is patently clear that Jackson’s constitutional right and protection of self defense were unjustly and injudiciously denied him by the trial judge.

    As the audacity of attacks by Fulani terrorists masquerading as cattle herders have been rising in intensity without any concerted strategy and effort by security agencies to rein them in, Nigerians had long concluded that the security architecture had been rigged to not just shield the herders from being answerable to the law but even being provided support by some elements among the security agencies.

    Now, from the suspected security coverage for the terrorists and the Supreme Court’s verdict on Sunday Jackson, there is the growing belief that even the judiciary may have become complicit in the attacks.

    As Jackson was the one farming on his land when he was attacked by an intruder, legal experts say the law on self defence should have justified his action that led to Ardo Bawuro’s death.

    But even if the Adamawa Director of Public Prosecution felt Ardo Bawuro’s death could have been avoided, which is actually untenable, the worst he could have been charged Jackson with is manslaughter.

    By the Supreme Court decision, however, the judiciary has given the impression that it is an enabler of the murderous gang of Fulani terrorists in a game of killing, rape, kidnap, occupation and genocide.

    As communities in Benue state are now routinely sacked and their occupied, the Supreme Court bears vicarious responsibility for the rising audacious attacks by the Fulani.

    According to Open Doors’ 2025 World Watch List, Nigeria ranks seventh on the list of the 50 worst countries for Christians, remaining among the most dangerous places on earth for them. Of the 4,476 Christians killed for their faith worldwide during the reporting period, 3,100 (69 percent) were in Nigeria, according to the WWL.

    Judgements as that given by the Supreme Court reinforce the perception that the country is being overrun by religious extremists, protected and egged on by the state.

    Jackson has been in detention since 2020 when he was arranged for refusing to allow a Fulani kill him in his farm. Unfortunately, the apex court was the last platform where justice would have been dispensed. It chose to sell its soul. Jackson is now on death row awaiting state murder. It is something that cannot be stomached by large sections of the country.

    It is up to Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri to save Nigeria from its darkest hour since the civil war by giving unconditional state pardon to Jackson. His murder, if it happens, portends a future too dark to imagine.

  • Supreme Court opens up on ex-CJN Uwais demise as Ozekhome praises judicial legacy

    Supreme Court opens up on ex-CJN Uwais demise as Ozekhome praises judicial legacy

    The Supreme Court of Nigeria has expressed its condolences to the family of the late former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mohammad Uwais.

    Justice Uwais, who served as the 9th CJN, died in the early hours of Friday.

    Dr Festus Akande, the Director of Information and Public Relations of the Supreme Court, in a statement in Abuja said Uwais left behind a formidable legacy of judicial excellence and integrity.

    “We honour his tireless dedication to the rule of law and the improvement of the Nigerian judiciary; values for which he will always be remembered.

    “His professional achievements and unwavering commitment to justice have had a lasting impact on Nigeria’s legal landscape.

    “He will be sorely missed by colleagues, friends, and the many lives he touched throughout his career.

    Uwais who was born on June 12, 1936, in Zaria, Kaduna State served as the 9th Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 until his retirement in 2006.

    He embarked on a remarkable journey through the legal profession.

    He was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple, London in 1963 and quickly made a name for himself through his commitment to justice and fairness.

    Over the decades, he held various influential positions within and outside the judiciary. During his tenure as Chief Justice, he championed judicial reforms aimed at improving the administration of justice in Nigeria.

    He was instrumental in the establishment of the National Judicial Council, which plays a critical role in maintaining the independence and integrity of the judiciary.

    Uwais was also dedicated to advancing legal education and was a mentor to many young lawyers and judges.

    Ozekhome mourns Uwais, praises judicial legacy

    Meanwhile, Prof. Mike Ozekhome, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, (SAN), has said the death of Justice Uwais at 89 came as a shock to him and the entire nation.

    Speaking with NAN, Ozekhome described Uwais as a towering figure in Nigeria’s legal and constitutional landscape.

    “One cannot say he died too young — he surpassed the average Nigerian male lifespan of 61.2 years,” the senior lawyer reflected.

    Uwais joined the Supreme Court with striking energy at age 43, Ozekhome noted, and served as Chief Justice for 11  years.

    “He left visible, enduring legacies. His tenure on the bench was marked by discipline, integrity, and deep legal scholarship,” Ozekhome added.

    He further praised Uwais’s leadership of the Supreme Court, noting that it was a period when judicial decisions were consistent and reliable.

    Beyond the courtroom, Uwais chaired the influential Presidential Committee on Electoral Reforms under the late President Umaru Yar’Adua.

    “The committee made ground-breaking recommendations. Nigeria might have avoided today’s electoral crises had they been implemented,” Ozekhome said.

    Uwais also led the Body of Benchers and served in international legal bodies, further cementing his national and global stature.

    His passing on Eid Kabir day, Ozekhome said, “is a sign that he was ready to meet his Creator. May Allah grant him Aljanah Firdausi.”

    Justice Uwais served as Nigeria’s Chief Justice from 1995 to 2006, and was born in Zaria, Kaduna State, in 1936.

    His career was defined by bold judicial reforms and an unwavering defence of judicial independence, leaving a mark on Nigerian legal history.

  • Appeal Court verdict: Ighodalo heads to Supreme Court

    Appeal Court verdict: Ighodalo heads to Supreme Court

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Thursday, affirmed the election of Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the governor of Edo and winner of the election held on September 21, 2024.

    A three-member panel of the court, in a unanimous judgment, held that the appeal by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Asue Ighodalo, was unmeritorious.

    Justice Olabode-Abimbola Adegbehingbe, who delivered the lead judgment, held that the appellants failed to show that the election tribunal erred in its decision and proceeded to affirm the judgment of the tribunal delivered on April 2.

    Justice Adegbehingbe also held that the tribunal was right to hold that the petitioners did not prove their allegations of non-compliance and over voting.

    The judge equally held that the evidence of 19 witnesses, called by the appellants at the tribunal, were insufficient to prove the allegations, adding that they failed to call relevant witnesses from the polling units complained about.

    “The case of the petitioners (appellants) was inadequately presented by calling only 19 witnesses, most of whom did not witness what happened at the polling units,” he said.

    Justice Adegbehingbe noted that 14 out of the 19 witnesses called by the respondents at the tribunal, gave evidence about what they did not witness, having not been present at the polling units when the election was held.

    He added that it was impossible for the appellants to prove over voting when they failed to tender voters register.

    In partly allowing the cross appeal filed by Okpebholo, Justice Adegbehingbe set aside the decision by the tribunal, admitting the 133 Bi-modal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines tendered by the appellants in their bid to prove over voting.

    The judge said the BVAS machines were wrongly admitted having been tendered from the bar by the appellants’ legal team.

    He further held that the tribunal was in grave error when it admitted the BVAS machines that were tendered from the bar in the absence of a prior consent of parties.

    The judge said: “The condition precedent to the admission of exhibits from the bar, which is concession, was absent.

    “The 133 BVAS machines were wrongly admitted in the manner adopted by the tribunal.”

    The judge added that the admission of the BVAS machines was a miscarriage of justice.

    He proceeded to set  it aside and expunged the BVAS from the record of  the tribunal.

    Justice Adegbehingbe also struck down some part of the petition filed before the tribunal by Ighodalo and the PDP for being defective.

    Meanwhile, Ighodalo and the PDP have vowed to challenge the decision of the Court of Appeal at the Supreme Court.

    A chieftain of the PDP, who was in  court, said their legal legal team had been instructed to immediately lodge an appeal before the apex court.

  • Defending the Supreme Court of Nigeria on the Rivers State emergency rule case – By Monday Ubani

    Defending the Supreme Court of Nigeria on the Rivers State emergency rule case – By Monday Ubani

    The recent criticism by the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) accusing the Supreme Court Justices of “cowardice” and deliberate delay in adjudicating the constitutional challenge to the Rivers State emergency rule is not only untrue, but fails to appreciate the fundamental principles of judicial process and constitutional adjudication.

    First, it must be emphasized that cases bordering on the interpretation of the Constitution, especially matters involving the declaration of a State of Emergency, the removal of an elected Governor, and the dissolution of a State legislature, are grave constitutional questions.

    The Supreme Court, conscious of its sacred duty, must ensure that due process is meticulously followed, including proper service of processes, filing of necessary responses by all parties, amicus briefs where necessary, and procedural compliance before constituting a panel and fixing a hearing date.

    Rushing such a profound matter for hearing without completing these procedural steps would defeat the ends of justice, embarrass the court, and potentially render any decision liable to unnecessary public criticism.

    Second, the Supreme Court, as the apex court, does not take instructions or pressure from political or civil society groups on when to hear a matter. The independence of the judiciary means that the Court must manage its docket free from external influence, including media sensationalism.

    Constitutional adjudication is not an exercise in activism; it requires careful, dispassionate, and detached analysis, insulated from the political tension swirling around the Rivers crisis. This grave constitutional matter requires appropriate and careful procedural steps to avoid backlash.

    Third, the Supreme Court handles a heavy caseload, including election petitions, constitutional references, final appeals from lower courts, and urgent interlocutory applications.

    The fact that a date has not yet been fixed barely a month after filing does not necessarily indicate bias, cowardice, or conspiracy. Complex matters sometimes require preliminary conferences, exchange of briefs, filing of counter-claims, and interlocutory motions, which must be resolved before substantive hearing dates are set.

    Fourth, it is important for stakeholders like HURIWA to avoid dragging the judiciary into political controversies. Allegations that the Court is trying to “pressure” governors to defect to APC or to endorse any political figure are wild, unsubstantiated, and deeply injurious to the institution of the judiciary.

    Without clear evidence, such accusations amount to reckless undermining of public confidence in the judiciary, which is itself a threat to constitutional democracy.

    Finally, the Supreme Court Justices are experienced jurists who understand their constitutional responsibilities and can not be casually accused of conspiratorial indifference without verifiable proof.

    Rather than condemning the Supreme Court unfairly, HURIWA and other stakeholders should exercise patience and trust in the judicial process.

    If there are real concerns about delay, the proper channel would be an application for accelerated hearing, not a public campaign to malign the apex court.

    The integrity, dignity, and independence of the judiciary must be preserved if Nigeria’s constitutional democracy is to survive.

  • Supreme Court judgment validates Abure’s leadership – LP Legal Adviser

    Supreme Court judgment validates Abure’s leadership – LP Legal Adviser

    The Labour Party Legal Adviser, Mr Kehinde Edun, says the Supreme Court judgment has further validated Mr Julius Abure’s position as the National Chairman of the party.

    Edun stated this on the sidelines of a news conference organised by the leadership of the party to clarify issues arising from the Supreme Court judgment on Friday in Abuja.

    “What happened was that Sen. Nenadi Usman and one other person filed an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal at the Supreme Court.

    “The argument was that courts should not be interfering in the internal affairs of political parties. That it is not the business of the court to say this is the chairman or this is not the chairman.

    “The Supreme Court agreed with them and said that everybody should respect party supremacy;
    that whatever the party has said is final, and that nobody should come to court to seek the declaration concerning the leadership of the political party.

    “The convention held and elected the National Executive Committee led by Barr. Julius Abure, whose tenure is still holding, and that’s what the court said, that everybody should respect that,” he said.

    The legal Adviser said that the judgment was indeed an indictment on the Usman-led caretaker committee.

    While commending the judgment, Edun said that it meant that political parties are strong, adding: “with the verdict, the Supreme Court is supporting the country’s democracy.

    “What it means is that political parties should sort out their affairs internally. They shouldn’t be running to the court to solve matters that they can solve on their own,” he said.

    The legal adviser, therefore, called on all dissenting voices within Labour Party to come together to move the party forward and prepare it for the 2027 general elections.