Tag: Supreme Court

  • Supreme Court fixes date to hear FG’s suit against 36 governors over LG funds

    Supreme Court fixes date to hear FG’s suit against 36 governors over LG funds

    The Supreme Court on Thursday fixed June 13 to hear a suit filled by the Federal Fovernment against the 36 state governors over alleged misconduct in the handling of local government affairs

    Justice Garba Lawal fixed the date while ruling in an application for abridgment of time argued by Lateef Fgebemi, SAN to allow time for all parties to file their processes and exchange same.

    He ordered the 36 state governors of the federation to file their respective defense to a suit instituted against them by the federal government seeking for full autonomy for the 774 local government in the country.

    Lawal who led a seven man panel of the apex court said that the decision of the court was predicated on the national urgency of the suit and the non objection from the attorneys general of the states of the federation.

    The apex court also ordered the attorney general of the federal of the federation that upon receipt of the governors defense, he must file his reply within two days.

    He ordered that the eight states that were not in attendance at Thursdays proceedings must be served with fresh hearing notice.

    The 8 state are Borno, Kano, Kogi, Niger, Ogun, Osun, Oyo and Sokoto, whose attorneys general were absent in court, despite being served with hearing notice.

    The Federal Government had dragged the 36 state governors to the Supreme Court over alleged misconduct in the handling of local government affairs

    Mr Lateef Fagbemi, the Attorney General of the Federation, instituted the action against the governors to seek full autonomy for local governments as the third tier of government.

    According to Fagbemi, the suit is a deliberate attempt at removing local governments from gross abuse by the state governors.

    In the suit marked SC/CV/343/2024, the AGF is praying the apex court for an order prohibiting state governors from unilateral, arbitrary and unlawful dissolution of democratically elected leaders for local governments.

    The governors were sued through their respective State Attorneys General.

    The suit is predicated on 27 grounds among which are that the Nigeria Federation is a creation of the 1999 Constitution with the President as head of the federal executive arm of the Federation who has sworn to uphold and give effects to the provisions of the Constitution.

    The originating summons personally signed by Fagbemi, has been fixed May 30 for hearing.

    He is praying the court for an order permitting the funds standing in the credits of local governments to be directly channeled to them from the federation account in line with the provisions of the constitution as against the alleged unlawful joint accounts created by governors.

    He also sought order stopping governors from constituting caretaker committees to run the affairs of local governments as against the constitutionally recognised and guaranteed democratically elected system.

    He applied for an order of injunction restraining the governors, their agents and privies from receiving, spending or tampering with funds released from the federation account for the benefits of local governments when no democratically elected local government system is put in place.

    Fagbemi asked the apex court to invoke sections 1, 4, 5, 7 and 14 of the constitution to declare that the state governors and State Houses of Assembly are under obligation to ensure democrati system at the third tier of government.

    The suit also wants the apex court to invoke the same sections to hold that the governors cannot lawfully dissolve democratically elected local government councils.

    A 13-paragragh affidavit in support of the originating summons deposed to by Kelechi Ohaeri from the AGF’s office, Fagbemi averred that filed the suit under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on behalf of the federal government.

    The deponent asserted that local government system recognised by the constitution is a democratically elected local government council and that the amount due to local government councils from the federation account is to be paid to local government system recognised by the constitution.

    That the governors represent the component states of the Federation with Executive Governors who have also sworn to uphold the Constitution and to, at all times, give effect to the Constitution and that the Constitution, being the supreme law, has binding force all over the Federation of Nigeria.

    Other prayers include: That the constitution of Nigeria recognises federal, states and local governments as three tiers of government and that the three recognised tiers of government draw funds for their operation and functioning from the Federation Account created by the Constitution.

    That by the provisions of the Constitution, there must be a democratically elected local government system and that the Constitution has not made provisions for any other systems of governance at the local government level other than democratically elected local government system.

    That in the face of the clear provisions of the Constitution, the governors have failed and refused to put in place a democratically elected local government system even where no state of emergency has been declared to warrant the suspension of democratic institutions in the state.

    That the failure of the governors to put democratically elected local government system in place is a deliberate subversion of the 1999 Constitution which they, and the President, have sworn to uphold.

    Fagbemi also said that all efforts to make the governors comply with the dictates of the 1999 Constitution, in terms of putting in place, a democratically elected local government system, have not yielded any result.

    The AGF said that the federal government  continued  to disburse funds from the Federation Account to the governors for non-existing democratically elected local government is to undermine the sanctity of the 1999 Constitution.

    He averred that in the face of the violations of the 1999 Constitution, the federal government is not obligated,  under section 162 of the Constitution, to pay any State, funds standing to the credit of local governments where no democratically elected local government is in place.

  • Adumein: Unsung warrior goes to the Supreme Court – By Owei Lakemfa

    Adumein: Unsung warrior goes to the Supreme Court – By Owei Lakemfa

    JUSTICE Moore Abraham Aseimo Adumein is one of the eleven new Justices of the Supreme Court to be sworn-in today, February 26, 2024. Some who knew him, in his younger days, did not believe he would move to the bench, not to talk of climbing to the apex court.

    This is because he was a very intelligent science student and mainly an environmentalist working in the Niger Delta, including as research assistant to his benefactor, Dr. B. Idoniboye-Obu, taking samples of polluted waters and soils, and helping villagers to build their cases for remediation and compensation.

    He was a rights’ activist who wanted justice for the Nigerian nationalities, in what later became known as “resource control”. In those days, he and some of us, including Chief Alex Ekiotene and Reverend Dadikumo Odondiri, learnt at the feet of the great Niger Delta leader, Pa George Weikezie, whose home in Apapa, Lagos, was open to all.

    Adumein was also very close to the Grand Old Man of Minority Rights in Nigeria, Chief Harold Dappa-Biriye. When the latter founded the Association of Mineral Producing Areas of Rivers State, AMPARS, to agitate for minority rights, as he had done during the 1957 Willinks Commission, Adumein was its youngest member and research officer.

    The AMPARS agitation, amongst others, led to the June 25, 1992 establishment of the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission, OMPADEC, as a special intervention agency in Nigeria. OMPADEC transformed in 2000 into the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC.

    Adumein, walking in the footsteps of his mentor, Chief Dappa-Biriye, became a national delegate of the National Republican Convention, NRC, one of the two parties decreed into existence by the Babangida regime. It was here he displayed what can be described as his ‘Audacity of Hope’.

    The Babangida regime had proclaimed that it wanted to hand over to “New Breed Politicians” and a young Adumein stretched this when he decided to run for the national chairmanship of the party after it was zoned to the South. Incredibly, his candidacy gained traction. The media dubbed him ‘The Eaglet National Chairmanship Candidate’.

    On the eve of the party’s national convention, the then Chief of Staff, Admiral Augustus Aikhomu, addressed the NRC caucus. Adumein was told that the regime was interested in Chief Tom Ikimi, whose candidacy had been declared. He was asked to step down and that he would be compensated. He agreed to step down but said he was not interested in any compensation. Perhaps, the regime did not believe him, because early in the morning of the convention, the secret police took over his hotel room.

    They had come to ‘escort’ him to the convention venue. Three of the men remained inside his room, while he took his bath and dressed. The armed men took him straight to the convention stage where shouts of “Rivers! Rivers!! Rivers!!!”, as he was known amongst delegates, rented the air. He announced that he was stepping down, and raised the hand of Chief Ikimi, who was later elected party national chairman along with other candidates on Adumein’s list.

    He was part of the movement that agitated for the creation of a new state out of Rivers State. When Bayelsa State was eventually created on October 1, 1996, he was consulted to be the pioneer Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice. But that was not to be.

    In 2002, he was appointed a High Court Judge in Bayelsa State and, in 2010, elevated to the Court of Appeal where he served in several Divisions and became the Presiding Justice, first of Ibadan Division and, later, Yola Division.

    The Court of Appeal, with Adumein presiding, and Justices Gyarazama Sanga Bitrus and Ganiyu Lateef Adebayo as Justices, on November 17, 2023, upheld the nullification of Kano State Governor Abba Yusuf’s election. The main basis was that Yusuf was not a member of the NNPP– the political party that purportedly sponsored him contrary to Section 177(c) of the Constitution. Adumein held that: “A person must be a member of a political party before he can be sponsored for an election. Sponsorship without membership is like putting something on nothing.”

    The ruling turned controversial when the certified true copy was contrary, obviously the result of a mix up. There was an instant media trial of the Justices, even without hearing from them or giving them the benefit of the doubt. Things got as ridiculous as some lawyers petitioning the United Nations! The Court’s Chief Registrar, in reaction, explained it was a mistake and that “Order 23 Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Hand Book” empowers the court to correct such errors.

    The subsequent Supreme Court decision on the Kano State case, raised more questions than answers. It might go the way of the controversial 1979 “Twelve Two-thirds” judgement that cannot be cited as a judicial precedent.

    As if he had premonition of what was to happen in his last days on the Court of Appeal bench, Adumein, in 2012, held in the case of Sijuade v. Oyewole that: “A tribunal or court is not a science laboratory where facts, issues and matters can be tried, tested and resolved with scientific certainty or exactitude…Courts only apply the test of ‘a reasonable man’ which is prone to human errors. Even in a scientific test, errors are not completely eliminated or ruled out…That Judges are fallible is a matter of ancient acclamation and acknowledgement… Judges will continue to acknowledge their fallibility, as only God is omniscient and infallible.”

    Adumein was the best, academically, in his primary, secondary and higher schools. He was also a Senior Prefect at Awori/Ajeromi Grammar School, Agboju, Lagos, and President of the Law Society, University of Lagos. He has received many academic and non-academic awards, both in Nigeria and overseas.

    Upon being called to the Bar, and after his National Youth Service, Adumein was the pioneer junior legal practitioner in the well-known law firm of E. C. Ukala & Co. (Efe Chambers), Port Harcourt, Rivers State, where he was groomed under the tutelage of Emmanuel C. Ukala, SAN.

    Some years ago, Adumein told me in an emotion-laden voice that he went from the back waters of environmentally-degraded Rivers to the rough life of Ajegunle(Jungle City) in Lagos; through the hardship he endured in Warri and Port Harcourt, he found himself under the glittering lights of Hong Kong doing post-graduate studies, he could not but marvel at God’s hand in his life.

    Justice Adumein is a survivalist having been knocked down many times, but each time, like a great boxer, he rises from the canvas to continue fighting; he never gives up.

  • Supreme Court voids AMCON takeover of Lagos Hotel

    Supreme Court voids AMCON takeover of Lagos Hotel

    The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal Lagos nullifying the takeover of the landed property of Suru Worldwide Ventures Nigeria Limited by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON).

    Justice Emmanuel Agim in his judgment dismissed the appeal brought to it by AMCON and affirmed the lower court’s decision to halt the company’s takeover and ordered a new hearing at the High Court.

    “I find no merit in this appeal. The judgment of the court of appeal is hereby affirmed”, Agim declared.

    The appellate court had in a lead judgment by Justice Ugochukwu Ogakwu, held that the failure of AMCON to join Suru Worldwide Ventures Nigeria Limited as a defendant in its suit before the Federal High Court rendered the proceedings leading to the takeover order nullity.

    The court also ordered that the matter be returned to the Federal High Court for a fresh hearing

    A Federal High Court in Lagos had ordered the takeover of the company’s property by AMCON for not paying the loan obtained from the defunct Oceanic Bank.

    AMCON had prayed the court to order security agencies to offer it protection to enable it to exercise its possessory rights as a legal mortgagee under the Deeds of Legal Mortgage, over Suru Worldwide Ventures Nigeria Limited’s landed properties.

    But Suru Worldwide Ventures Nigeria Limited appealed against the judgment on the grounds that it was denied a fair hearing because it was not joined as a defendant.

  • Supreme Court orders votes recount in El Salvador

    Supreme Court orders votes recount in El Salvador

    A large proportion of the votes cast in the presidential and parliamentary elections in El Salvador must be recounted due to technical issues, the president of the Supreme Electoral Court said.

    Nearly 30% of the ballot boxes used for the presidential election and all ballot boxes used for the parliamentary election in the Central American country will have to be checked, Dora Martínez said.

    After 70% of the votes had been counted, President Nayib Bukele was in the lead with 83% on Monday morning. Since then, however, the results have not been updated in the electoral authority’s electronic system.

    The delays in the parliamentary elections’ results were even more serious.

    Only 5 per cent of the votes have been counted so far.

    Local media reported problems such as a duplication of votes when uploading the data to the electronic system.

    Bukele had already declared himself the winner of the election late on Sunday before the first results were announced.

    He also announced that his Nuevas Ideas (New Ideas) party had won at least 58 of El Salvador parliament’s 60 seats.
    The conservative head of state is known for his crackdown on crime and his authoritarian approach.

    El Salvador’s constitution actually prohibits the direct re-election of the president.

    However, constitutional judges loyal to the government allowed Bukule to run.

    To circumvent the ban, the head of state only has to take a leave of absence for six months – until the day of the planned inauguration on June 1.

  • BREAKING: Court dismisses Binani’s suit challenging Fintiri’s election

    BREAKING: Court dismisses Binani’s suit challenging Fintiri’s election

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the appeal filed by  Aishatu Ahmed, also known as Binani, challenging the election of Gov. Ahmadu Fintiri of Adamawa.

    Delivering judgment, he Justice John Okoro, held that the suit was lacking in merit.

    Okoro also held that a resident electoral commissioner lacks powers to announce election results.

     

    Details Latter:

     

  • Gov Yusuf denies signing pact with presidency over Supreme Court judgement

    Gov Yusuf denies signing pact with presidency over Supreme Court judgement

    Gov. Abba Yusuf of Kano State on Monday dismissed entering into any pact with the Presidency prior to the Jan. 12 Supreme Court judgment that validated his election.

    This is contained in a statement by his Director-General, Media and Publicity, Mr Bature Dawakin-Tofa, in Kano on Monday.

    Dawakin-Tofa described a document already circulating and indicating a four-term agreement between the governor and the presidency as an imaginary piece devoid of any iota of truth.

    He urged the public to disregard a fake agreement claiming the governor had accepted to cross carpet to the ruling APC and other terms of agreement.

    “Gov. Yusuf would like to make it abundantly clear that having secured his mandate through popular votes of the good people of Kano, and certified by a fair affirmation of Supreme Court judgment, he would not be intimidated by any political opportunist.

    “Let me also remind those political jobbers hiding under the leniency of Mr. President that whatever political decision or direction that would be taken in Kano will be determined within the confines of the rule of law and executive powers vested in the executive governor.

    The statement clarified  that the establishment of Kano Elders Council was a personal initiative of the governor to find lasting solutions to solvable problems affecting the state’s socio-economic and political well-being.

    It added the governor was not under pressure to form the council.

    ‘It is on record that the justices of the Supreme Court delivered a landmark Judgment with justice, equity and fairness and largely protected the integrity of the judiciary,” it said.

    The governor, however, expressed appreciation to President Tinubu for allowing the level playing ground for justice to prevail through non-interference with the judicial process.

    He said the president had demonstrated profound leadership quality by ensuring fair play in spite of being pushed “by some undemocratic elements from Kano and beyond”.

    “The president is a true democrat who will not undermine other political parties in the interest of his party.

    “However, the president should rather be appreciated for maintaining neutrality, peace and stability in Kano.

    ” On this single act, the good people of Kano will continue to appreciate Mr President and pray for him to succeed in his administration,” the statement said.

    It added that the governor had several opportunities to meet the president but that in all of his visits, the discussions centered around the development of Kano State.

  • Supreme Court reserves verdict on Binani’s suit against Adamawa Governor

    Supreme Court reserves verdict on Binani’s suit against Adamawa Governor

    The Supreme Court on Monday reserved judgment in the appeal by the All Progressives Congress (APC) and its governorship candidate, Aisha Dahiru, popularly called Binani, against the governor of Adamawa state, Ahmadu Fintiri.

    The tribunal and Court of Appeal had dismissed Binani’s petition challenging the victory of Finitiri in the governorship election held last year.

    The five-member panel led by John Okoro adjourned the matter for judgment after listening to the arguments of the parties involved in the matter.

    The main contention of Binani, through her counsel, Akin Olujimi, at the day’s proceeding, is that the controversial declaration by the Resident Electoral Commissioner, Hudu Ari, was lawful.

  • Fubara speaks after Supreme Court verdict

    Fubara speaks after Supreme Court verdict

    Gov. Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers says he will remain committed to the purpose he was elected and will no longer allow anything to distract his administration.

    Fubara said this on Thursday at the Government House, while addressing newsmen on the heels of the Supreme Court affirmation of his election as the governor of Rivers.

    Fubara said his triumph at the Supreme Court has laid to rest the legal battles that added to the distractions his administration grappled with in the last eight months.

    “About an hour ago, the Supreme Court revalidated our mandate in the election.

    “It is a victory for the entire state

    “It is important for us to note that we need this victory to consolidate the purpose of governance.

    “Prior to this moment, we have had a few distractions here and there.

    “And the good news that came to us this morning is a refreshing strength that will encourage us to continue the good work in governance,” Fubara said.

    He expressed gratitude to God for His help and President Bola Tinubu for his fatherly role in the internal crisis and litigation against his election.

    He also extended gratitude to his predecessor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom Wike, whom he described as his “Oga”, for all his support.

    The governor called on everyone to join hands with his administration to build a competitive state that would be reckoned with as truly prosperous in all ramifications.

    “We have a dream of making it a highly competitive state that will measure, if not up to Lagos but close to becoming like Lagos.

    “We can only achieve this in an atmosphere of peace.

    “So, I am calling on everyone, not just on our internal issue but those members from other parties, the issue is settled, come and let’s build the Rivers of our dream

    “We will continue to protect and provide the basic needs of governance to everyone who is doing business and who lives in Rivers,” Fubara said.

    He further said that he would soon address the good people of the state on the apex court victory.

    “For now, let everybody be happy that one elephant is out of the road, the other one, by God’s help, will be resolved amicably and the family will be one.

  • JUST IN : Supreme Court dismisses Umar’s appeal, affirms Aliyu as Sokoto Governor

    JUST IN : Supreme Court dismisses Umar’s appeal, affirms Aliyu as Sokoto Governor

    The Supreme Court has affirmed the election of Ahmed Aliyu as the governor of Sokoto State, dismissing the appeal of Saidu Umar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The judgement of the apex court panel led by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun was delivered by Justice Tijani Abubakar.

    The appellant had challenged the election of Governor Ahmed Aliyu of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Umar and the PDP had asked the Supreme Court to set aside the concurrent judgements of the Court of Appeal of the Tribunal.

    He cited malpractices, non-compliance with the Electoral Act as grounds to nullify the election of Aliyu.

    He asked the court to declare him as the authentic winner of the election, or in the alternative, declare the election as inconclusive and order a re-run in about 138 polling units.

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had last year declared Aliyu, the governorship candidate of the APC as the winner of the March 18 governorship election.

    Aliyu polled a total of 453,661 votes to defeat his closest rival and PDP candidate, who polled 404,632 votes.

    Dissatisfied with the outcome, Umar approached the Sokoto Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal and dismissed Umar’s petition against Governor Aliyu and his deputy, Idris Gobir.

    In a unanimous judgement on September 30, the Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Haruna Mshelia, dismissed Umar’s petition, saying the petitioners failed to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.

    Still not satisfied with the ruling, the PDP candidate filed an appeal before the appellate court in Abuja but still lost.

    Last November, the Court of Appeal in Abuja affirmed the election of Ahmad Aliyu as governor of Sokoto State.

  • JUST IN : Supreme Court declares Agbu Kefas as Taraba Governor

    JUST IN : Supreme Court declares Agbu Kefas as Taraba Governor

    The Supreme Court has affirmed the election of Agbu Kefas as governor of Taraba State.

    The apex court, in a unanimous decision on Thursday, dismissed the appeal by Professor Yahaya Sani of the New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) for grossly lacking in merit.

    Sani had asked the apex court to set aside the victory of Governor Kefas Agbu in the March 18, 2023, governorship election.

    He had alleged non-compliance with the Electoral Act, irregularities, and other malpractices.

    He is asked by the court to pronounce him the winner of the election on the grounds of scoring a majority of the lawful votes cast.

    The Court of Appeal, Abuja, had in November dismissed Sani’s appeal on the Tribunal’s judgement upholding Kefas’ election.

    In a unanimous decision, the appellate court dismissed the appeal of the NNPP for lacking merit, as did the Tribunal on September 30.

    Governor Kefas had polled 257,926 votes to defeat Yahaya who got 202,277 votes in the March 18, 2023, governorship election.