Tag: Suspension

  • Suspension of elected representatives and Senate’s Mace saga, By Carl Umegboro

    By Carl Umegboro

    The legislature has over the years played politics to the extreme by repeatedly, egotistically misappropriating its gavel in contradiction of democratic norm, and severally, conceitedly axed opposing colleagues that were elected by the people in their respective senatorial districts and constituencies for their counterparts at the House of Representatives or Assembly. By democratic norms, the electorates freely and wittingly bid their mandate to some persons to exercise the sovereignty on their behalf as their representatives and therefore can only be removed from workplace by the people. The fundamental principle guiding all rules and laws is Section 1(3) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended which emphatically makes the provisions of the constitution superior to all other laws including the Senate Rules. Irrefutably, the constitution recognises Delta state as a part of the federation and equally empowered it to be represented by senators as other states. In other words, the action of the senate recently by suspending a duly elected legislator, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege representing Delta central senatorial district is clearly a display of disdain and naivety, and above all, constitutes a robbery against the entire people of the area.

    By the grotesque intrigues, the entire population of the senatorial district being represented is unconsciously, impliedly kicked out from the federal government by shutting out their representative from participating in legislative businesses, sadly by elected colleagues. Frankly speaking, the action fell below the bar of decorum. This aberration gravely portends danger as any acts of the parliament during the period of such unlawful suspension cannot legally stand without carrying along the senatorial district that is likewise a stakeholder in the national project. Succinctly, all resolutions during the unlawful moratorium should logically be null and void as it is a legitimate right of all senatorial districts and constituencies to be part of policies for the nation. The risk in sustaining the noxious, malevolent and mischievous scheme is that it could someday extensively be used as a political tool of oppression against a district, constituency or geographical zone that genuinely clamors for welfare of its population such that its representative may also be kicked out ahead of the plenary.

    Imperatively, election and recall, apart from orders of the court afford the electorates rights to ‘hire and fire’ those they endorsed for public offices. It therefore becomes inconceiveable that legislators, duly elected with certificate-of-return and consequently sworn-in to represent their people can only exercise the mandate by the discretion of other elected colleagues. The mandate to represent the people in the Senate, House of Representatives or Assembly is not in any way a shared responsibility or conditional, but sacrosanct; exclusively determined by the people. And even if a colleague is found guilty of any violations including in-house rules, the appropriate people to call the shorts or cut short the primary duties are the electorates. At most, the legislative chamber can withdraw privileged benefits it freely allotted by partisan considerations where violation is substantiated against the colleague. That’s the extent House Rules can go except where such rules are not inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution unlike the present quagmire. Thus, no legislative body has powers to shut out a bona fide legislator elected to represent a group of people in legislative businesses of the nation.

    Democracy is etymologically, the government of the people, by the people and for the people. It therefore connotes that the people plays fundamental roles in any democratic system as it is virtually all about the people. Thus, where the representative of the people is denied access into government businesses, it is tantamount to intimidation, terrorization and muzzling of the entire people being represented. To sum, the action of the senate is aptly treasonous and felonious; criminal offenses punishable with terms of imprisonments against the perpetrators. It is clearly hostilities against Section 14(2)(c) of the 1999 Constitution, and inimical to corporate existence of the nation. Politics must be played within the borders. To barefacedly and recklessly shut out or suspend, even for a day, a legislator that represents a legitimate group recognized by the nation’s constitution for whatever reasons let alone frivolities and partisanship is the height of law-breaking and should expeditiously attract full wraths of the law. A legislator that contravenes in-house rules may lose secondary assigned positions or duties but not the primary duties assigned by the electorates which is similar to shutting out the entire people of the district or constituency from participation in the government.

    As it stands, the senate has by its reckless action unconsciously suspended the entire people of Delta central senatorial district from legislative businesses of the country for ninety days. That’s the height of provocation in a democracy and believably, without the provocative attack on the people, the disgraceful snatching of the Senate Mace, albeit condemned in strong terms, wouldn’t have occurred. Probably, the jumbo allowances the lawmakers covetously allocated to themselves made them forget the concept of representation of the legislature vis-à-vis the people. Emphatically, the legislative arm albeit misconstrued by politicians is the peoples’ corner. The National Assembly transcends a legislative building rather an assembly or gathering of representatives of all nationalities and ethnic groups. A legislator is irrespective of his height or status, apparently the symbol of the constituency he represents and therefore any actions against him is directed at his people. Comparatively, suspending or shutting out an elected representative from the parliament is not different from removing a member-nation’s flag from the ECOWAS or United Nations headquarters. Unfortunately, true democracy largely remains a myth in the contemporary society instead, draining of the people flourishes as a common goal. To digress, it is indeed upsetting that most allocations made for constituency projects for districts and constituencies in the country end up in foreign countries for acquiring exquisite properties for ‘distinguished senators and honorable members’. What an inhumanity to man!

    Umegboro, public affairs analyst writes from Abuja via umegborocarl@gmail.com (07057101974 SMS only)

  • Sex-for-mark Scandal: ASUU hails suspension of indicted lecturer

    The Obafemi Awolowo University branch of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has commended the management of the institution for the indefinite suspension of Richard Akindele, the professor at the centre of the leaked sex-for-mark audio scandal.

    Reacting to a statement from the office of the Vice-Chancellor, Eyitope Ogunbodede, on Thursday, the union’s chairman, Adeola Egbedokun, said the union was satisfied with the prompt action taken by the university on the scandal.

    The university had set up an investigative panel to examine the recorded phone conversation between Mr. Akindele and a female student identified by the panel to be Monica Osagie, in which the former was demanding sex to alter the student’s grade.

    “ASUU commends the administration for the step taken towards ensuring sanity in the system,” Egbedokun said

    “ASUU OAU reiterates its commitment to defending the integrity of the code of conduct of the university and to upholding its ethical standards.”

    The union admonished its members to always adhere strictly to the “code of conduct guiding their appointment in the university as they carry out their lawful duties”.

    Akindele was found culpable of serious misconduct by the investigative panel and recommended for indefinite suspension pending further action at the conclusion of the investigation.

  • Omo-Agege’s suspension: APC chieftain wants AGF to intervene

    A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Delta State, Prince Christopher Agaga has taken the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Alhaji Abubakar Malami to task over the violations of the country’s constitution that led to the suspension of Senator Ovie Omo-Agege from the Senate.

    Agaga in a statement made available to the press condemned the Senate’s decision to suppress the right of Senator Omo-Agege to expression. He said the decision meant that the Urhobo ethnic group has been left without representation.

    “For as long as the Minister of Justice does not rise to the occasion to proactively stop the constitution from being desecrated and shredded so long shall we have this regime of impunity that has now become the forte of the leadership of the Senate and House of Representatives as a cog in the wheel to the growth of democratic culture, governance and development of the country,” Agaga said.

    He went further to say that “Now we are having on our hands a repeat too many to condone, in the latest imperial action of the Senate, in suspending an elected senator who is the voice and mouthpiece of more than two million people of Delta Central Senatorial District with a backlash that could debilitate the weak fabric of our federation especially with the perception of constituents hard hit by the suspension order that they are being technically excised from Nigeria, there cannot be a more apposite time than this for the Minister to rise up to the challenge by initiating legal measures to arrest the ugly and disgusting situation with a view to reassuring the people of Delta central senatorial district who have vowed to protect their rights recognized by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Africa Charter on Human and people’s right that they are valued and recognized as an integral part of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

    “In the past that was the trend that helped grow democratic culture and values as witnessed by instituting of court cases by state governments against federal government and vice versa on issues they considered as encroachment on constitutional provisions.

    “This is the time to go back to the regime of deploying legal measures to curb the excesses of people and organs/ institutions of government. This option is far more rewarding than the Gestapo approach of using anti corruption agencies to harass and intimidate people the hallmark of president Obasanjo’s government still flickering in this government with little success to show for it because President Muhammadu Buhari is not gifted with a sadistic temperament for such abusive actions.

    “Nigerians can still remember the number of Senate presidents, governors and PDP national chairmen illegally removed from office by Obasanjo’s barbaric practices. We therefore call on the Attorney General to always do the needful to protect our democracy and restrain people from advocating and calling for autocratic measures of Obasanjo that should be trashed forever,” the statement further read.

     

  • Court rejects Omo-Agege’s bid to stop suspension from Senate

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected an ex parte application filed by the lawmaker representing Delta Central in the Senate, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege, to stop his suspension by the Senate.

    He had, on April 3, filed the ex-parte application before Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, asking the court to order that “all further proceedings against the plaintiff (the Senator) in respect of the allegations referred to the 1st defendant’s (Senate) Committee for Ethics, Privileges and Public Petition” be halted pending the hearing and determination of his main suit.

    Omo-Agege asked the court to order parties to the main suit, earlier filed on March 26, 2018, “not to consider, act on or give effect to any recommendation, resolution or decision of the 1st respondent’s (Senate) Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petition.”

    The defendants to the suit are the Senate, the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, and the Attorney General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN).

    But the Senate, on Thursday, suspended the Senator for 90 legislative days for his comments that the amendment to the Electoral Act 2010 to reorder the sequence of polls in a general election was targeted at President Muhammadu Buhari.

    This came after the Federal High Court in Abuja had, on Wednesday, rejected his ex-parte application requesting that parties be ordered to maintain the status quo by suspending all actions concerning the issues raised in respect of the case.

    On Wednesday, Omo-Agege’s lawyer, Mr. E. R. Emukpoeuo, had moved his client’s ex parte application filed before Justice Nnamdi Dimgba on April 3, 2017.

    Ruling, however, Justice Dimgba refused to grant the order directing parties to maintain the status quo.

    The judge held that “in the interest of maintaining the balance of power between the judicial and the legislative organs of government,” he could not grant such orders without hearing from the defendants.

    Rather, the judge ordered that the defendants be served with the processes in the suit to enable them to respond to the Senator’s application.

    The judge said, “It is hereby ordered as follows:

    That in the interest of maintaining the balance of power between the judicial and the legislative organs of government, I am not minded to granting the reliefs sought for now without hearing from the defendants.

    That the defendants shall be put on notice to appear before me to explain why the interim preservatory order sought should not be granted.

    That this matter shall be accorded an accelerated hearing.”

    The judge then adjourned until Friday for hearing.

  • Confusion trails lifting of Oando technical suspension

    Investors in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) were thrown into confusion as hours after the six-month old technical suspension the Exchange placed on the shares of Oando Plc was lifted and later reversed.

    The NSE had disclosed in a notice last Tuesday, that the decision to lift the technical suspension was based on a request by the SEC. The notice signed by Director, Regulation, NSE, Tinuade T. Awe, stated: “We refer to all prior communication regarding the technical suspension of trading in the shares of Oando Plc (Oando) implemented on the directive of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) on 23 October 2017.

    “Please be informed that further to a 9 April 2018 directive of the Commission, The Exchange lifted the technical suspension placed on Oando’s shares after the close of trading today, 10 April 2018.

    “Consequently, there will be no impediment to price movement in the shares of Oando” But the NSE rescinded its decision, during the trading hours, stating that the shares of the company listed on both the Nigerian and Johannesburg Exchanges, re-mained on technical suspension.

    For the less than eight hours it traded following the lifting of the technical suspension, shares of Oando gained 10 points on the NSE, trading at N6.60 as against N5.99 before the lifting of the suspension. It will be recalled that the NSE on 18th October 2017 announced that it had placed the shares of Oando Plc, on ‘full suspension for 48 hours.’

    Thereafter, on 23rd October 2017, the NSE further announced that it had placed the shares of the company on ‘Technical Suspension’. The NSE by a letter dated 18th October 2017 informed management of Oando Plc that the suspension of the company’s shares by the NSE was done in compliance with a directive issued to it by the SEC. Efforts to get the reasons by the reversal proved abortive as NSE and SEC Corportate Communications Officers neither picked their calls nir responded to inquiries.

    Only last Tuesday, a group of Concerned Shareholders of Oando Plc had called on Muhammadu Buhari; Vice President Yemi Osinbajo; Senate President Bukola Saraki; Speaker, House of Representatives, Hon. Yakubu Dogara and other well-meaning Nigerians to prevail on the NSE and SEC to lift the technical suspension placed on the oil firm’s shares.

  • JUST IN: Reps lift suspension on Jibrin

    The House of Representatives on Tuesday lifted the suspension placed on the former Chairman of its Committee on Appropriation, Rep. Abdulmumin Jibrin (Kano-APC).

    This followed a letter of apology sent to the House by Jibrin, which was presented by the Speaker, Mr Yakubu Dogara, at plenary.

    Recall that the lawmaker was suspended in 2016 for 180 legislative days for allegedly exposing “budget padding” scandal in the legislative arm of government.

    Presenting the letter, Dogara said that the suspended legislator had met all the conditions necessary for him to resume his duties.

    He, therefore, said that the lawmaker was free to resume his legislative duties whenever he wished.

     

    Details shortly…

  • Boko Haram: Humanitarian operations in Rann still suspended – UN

    The United Nations on Saturday said that suspension of humanitarian operations in Rann, Borno, on March 2 was still in force.

    The suspension was announced as the UN withdrew its workers from the community after a March 1 attack by suspected Boko Haram terrorists who killed eight persons, including three aid workers, and abducted a nurse.

    The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA) said Nigeria’s Humanitarian Coordinator, Mr Edward Kallon, was meeting with high-level Government officials in Abuja in Maiduguri.

    It also said that Kallon would travel to Maiduguri next week for assessment of the situation in the North-East.

    The UN had said that it would conduct an assessment of Rann in the wake of the March 1 attack and evacuation of humanitarian officials.

    At present, there is no aid worker presence in Rann as the 52 aid workers who were there were evacuated last Friday.

    Across north-east Nigeria, there are approximately 3,000 aid workers operating in 26 locations, compared to only a few hundred in early 2016,” the UN said.

    It explained that the operational capacity of humanitarian partners in the three most affected states by the Boko Haram insurgency – Adamawa, Borno and Yobe – continued to expand.

    The UN said that the humanitarian partners in the three states consisted of 73 national and international partners.

    These were in addition to 31 international Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), 33 national NGOs and nine UN agencies.

    Following the attack, UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, announced the immediate evacuation of all humanitarian personnel and the temporary suspension of all humanitarian deliveries in the area.

    According to the UN, one other aid worker remains critically injured and another three are still missing while eight members of the Nigerian national security forces were also killed.

    The UN chief had said that at the time of the attack, over 40 humanitarian workers were in Rann.

  • Jibrin’s suspension: S’Court orders lawyer to pay N2m for filing frivolous appeal

    The Supreme Court has fined a lawyer, Mr. Tolu Babaleye, N2m for filing a frivolous appeal to delay the hearing of a suit filed by a former Chairman of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Appropriation, Abdulmumin Jibrin,‎ to challenge his suspension for 180 legislative days since September 28, 2016.

    A five-man panel of the apex court headed by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, during the proceedings that held on Wednesday, delivered a unanimous bench judgment shortly after parties to the appeal adopted their papers in the course of the proceedings.

    Describing the appeal as “vexatious and frivolous”, Justice Ejembi Eko, who delivered the lead judgment of the court, ordered Babaleye to pay each of the four respondents to the appeal, including Jibrin, the sum of N500,000.

    Apart from Jibrin, the other respondents ordered to be paid N500,000 each were the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Yakubu Dogara; the House of Representatives and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

    The court ordered that the total fine amounting to N2m must be personally paid by the lawyer.

    Babaleye had filed the appeal on behalf of two members of the House of Representatives – Nicholas Ossai and Orker-Jev Yisa – asking to be allowed to be joined as defendants to Jibrin’s case which is still pending before the Federal High Court.

    Ossai was the Chairman of House Committee on Ethics, which recommended Jibrin’s suspension and Yisa was the House member who moved the motion for the suspension of the Kano lawmaker.

    Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, where Jibrin’s substantive suit is still pending, had on April 13, 2017, dismissed the lawmakers’ joinder application, describing them as “strangers” with no interest to protect in the proceedings.

    The lawmakers had, through their lawyer, Babaleye, appealed to the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which had also in its judgment delivered on December 17, 2017, dismissed their case.

    The two legislators had further appealed to the Supreme Court.

    At the hearing of the appeal before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, the appellants’ lawyer, Babaleye, faced a torrent of questions from the members of the CJN-led panel, expressing their concerns about the frivolity of the appeal.

    In response, Babaleye maintained that the appeal was necessary and filed to enable the appellants “to clear their names”.

  • Adeosun suspended me because I refused to stop Oando audit – Gwarzo

    Suspended Director General of Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Munir Gwarzo has said the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun because he (Gwarzo) refused to stop the audit of Oando.

    The suspended DG revealed this at an investigative hearing organised by the House Committee on Capital Market and Institutions on Tuesday at the National Assembly.

    However, the minister insisted that the suspension of Mr. Gwarzo followed due process.

    “Mr. Munir was suspended in accordance with the public service rule. The suspension is in line with the Public Service Rules (PSRs) 03405 and 03406,” the minister said.

    She said the Investment and Securities Act empowers the minister to act in absence of the board.

    “In absence of the board, the minister has the power to suspend the Director General. We have not gone outside the context of the law in suspending the DG,” she added.

    On the allegations linking Mr. Gwarzo’s suspension to the forensic audit being conducted on Oando, she said simply: “it is mischief to link the matter to Oando.”

    Meanwhile, the suspended director general, insisted that the minister had no powers to suspend him.

    He said that interference by the minister of finance into the affairs of SEC has never happened in the history of the organisation.

    He said the commission should not be seen, ”as a public service.”

    “I was removed pursuant to non-existing laws in Nigeria,” Mr. Gwarzo said.

    He added that the minister earlier told him before his suspension that he should stop the forensic audit on Oando and Oasis Insurance Company which he attributed as the reason for his suspension.

    He accused the minister of having special interest in the two companies.

    The minister had suspended Mr. Gwarzo, from office over allegations of financial misappropriation.

    She further clarified that the suspension was to allow ”unhindered investigation into several allegations of financial impropriety leveled against Mr. Gwarzo.”

    Recall that Mr. Gwarzo was suspended alongside Abdulsalam Naif-Habu, the Head of Media Division and Anastasia Braimoh, who heads the Legal Department.

    Mr. Gwarzo was alleged to have ”paid himself” N104 million severance package when he was appointed DG SEC, from the position of a director in the same commission.

    This, the minister said is in total disregard to the standing rule in the civil service which states that severance benefit can only be paid to an employee who has concluded his or her service or has completely disengaged from service.

    Prior to these controversies, the House of Representatives resolved to probe all allegations of corruption in the SEC.

    The committee on capital markets and institutions are expected to lay their recommendations before the House soon.

     

  • Court strikes out Jibrin’s suit to compel House of Reps to lift suspension

    The quest by the embattled lawmaker, Hon Abdulmumin Jibrin, to return to the House of Representatives after been suspended by his colleagues for going against the rules of the parliament has suffered a great set back as a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has adjourned a suit instituted by him to push for his return indefinitely.

    The suit filed by Hon. Jibrin to challenge his suspension from the House of Representatives was rejected by the Federal High Court due to the existence of an appeal on the same matter which is pending at the Supreme Court.

    Counsel to Hon Jibrin Chief Femi Falana, SAN, had argued that the High Court should disregard the appeal pending at the Supreme Court over the issue of joinder of some members of the House to the action.

    However, counsel to the House of Representatives drew the attention of the court to the pendency of the appeal before the Supreme Court and urged the Court not to proceed with the case as according to him, Chief Falana was trying to set the lower court in collusion with the apex court of the land.

    In his ruling, Justice John Tsoho said that however the manner the information about the appeal before the Supreme Court gets to him, he will not continue with the case until the matter is dispensed with by the apex court.

    It would be recalled that Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin had, in 2017, commenced Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/812/2016 to challenge his suspension from the House.

    Similarly, some individuals who identified themselves as his constituents, also commenced separate a action with Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/796/ 2016 seeking nullification of his suspension.

    When both matters came up on the 10th of January this year, the Federal High Court maintained that in the case of the suit filed by Hon. Jibrin, it would respect the Supreme Court and await its decision on the joinder to the suit of Hon. Ossai Nicholas Ossai and Hon. Orker – Jev Emmanuel Yisa, who said their characters were impugned by accusations made by Hon. Jibrin.

    On the related suit filed by three members of Kiru/Bebeji Federal Constituency, the court struck out the suit for lacking in substance and want of diligent prosecution.