Tag: Tribunal

  • Military tribunal sentences 60 civilians to jail

    Military tribunal sentences 60 civilians to jail

    Pakistan’s controversial military courts sentenced 60 civilians to prison terms in connection with violent protests following the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khanin in 2023, sparking strong international criticism.

    The military’s media wing ISPR on Thursday said that the Field General Court Martial handed down the punishments to the 60 civilians after examining all evidences and completion of due process.

    The court announced the sentences ranging from two to 10 years in prison for involvement in attacks on military facilities on May 9, 2023.

    Khan’s nephew was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment for attacking a corps commander’s house in Lahore.

    “All convicts retain the right to appeal and other legal recourses, as guaranteed by the Constitution and law,” the ISPR said.

    Earlier, 25 civilians were sentenced after trials in military courts for the same charges.

    The announcement drew sharp criticism from Britain, the European Union, the United States and rights groups.

    On Monday, the U.S. State Department said it was “deeply concerned” that civilians have been sentenced by a military tribunal.

    “These military courts lack judicial independence, transparency, and due process guarantees. The United States continues to call on Pakistani authorities to respect the right to a fair trial and due process, as enshrined in Pakistan’s constitution,” it said in a statement.

    Pakistan’s security forces arrested hundreds of Khan’s supporters after they attacked military installations and government buildings following his arrest. More than 100 people were tried in military tribunals.

    Khan, who ruled Pakistan between 2018 and 2022, has been in jail for more than a year after being convicted on several corruption charges. He denies the charges against him.

  • Edo Election Petitions tribunal adjourns until Jan. 13

    Edo Election Petitions tribunal adjourns until Jan. 13

    The 2024 Edo Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal has adjourned until Jan. 13, hearing of a petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against the victory of Gov. Monday Okpebholo.

    The petitioners, Dr Asue Ighodalo and the PDP, are challenging the declaration of Okpebholo as the winner of the Sept. 21 poll by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    According to INEC, Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) polled 291,667 votes, against PDP’s Ighodalo, who got 247,274 votes.

    Justice Wilfred Kpochi, Chairman of the tribunal, adjourned for hearing following the adoption of the pre-hearing report.

    In a pre-hearing report adopted on Saturday, the parties agreed to call a total of 290 witnesses.

    The report outlined the timeframe for the examination of witnesses, with 40 minutes allocated for examination-in-chief for each star witness, 30 minutes for cross-examination by petitioners, and 20 minutes for cross-examination by each respondent.

    Other agreements reached by the parties include the allocation of 10 minutes for re-examination of each star witness and 25 minutes for examination-in-chief for other ordinary witnesses.

    The petitioners are expected to call their witnesses within 21 days or less, while respondents will have 10 days each to call their witnesses.

    According to the report, the tribunal would sit daily from 10 am, except on Sundays and other public holidays gazetted by law.

  • Edo: Drama as committee storms tribunal to recover govt vehicle

    Edo: Drama as committee storms tribunal to recover govt vehicle

    There was a mild drama on Wednesday in Benin as members of the state government Assets Recovery Committee stormed the 2024 Edo Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal to recover a bus owned by the state government.

    The vehicle, which was a 32-seater-coaster bus, conveyed the counsels to the People’s Democratic Party, to the tribunal sitting in the premises of the Edo High Court.

    Some members of the recovery committee had, in the morning, before the sitting of the tribunal, attempted to recover the vehicle.

    The committee said the bus was one of the assets taken away by some officials of the immediate past administration of Godwin Obaseki.

    According to sources, the committee later reached an accord with the occupants who were majorly senior lawyers that the bus would be returned once it took them back to their destinations.

    Drama, however, ensued when the committee members reneged after the sitting and sought to forcefully recover the bus.

    The action later degenerated into fisticuffs among the occupants of the bus and some members of the committee.

    It took the intervention of the stalwarts of the All Progressives Congress and the People’s Democratic Party to settle the matter. The lawyers were later seen, leaving the court in the bus.

  • Drama at Code of Conduct Tribunal as 2 Chairmen lay claim to office

    Drama at Code of Conduct Tribunal as 2 Chairmen lay claim to office

    Mr Danladi Umar has continued to act as chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) despite a subsisting order from the Nigerian Senate ordering his removal.

    Recall in November, the Senate removed Danladi Umar, over alleged gross misconduct. This decision was made under Section 157(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended), which empowers the Senate to remove key public officials following due process.

    The sacking followed a closed-door session lasting over one and a half hours.

    Upon resumption of plenary, the Senate announced that more than 84 lawmakers supported the decision.

    However, CCT officials who spoke to Daily Trust claimed the embattled chairman, Danladi Umar and the newly appointed chairman, Mainasara Kogo, are laying claim to its chairmanship.

    It was learnt that the due had officially visited and held discussions with tribunal staff without any clear directive on who is in charge.

    President Bola Tinubu had on July 13 appointed Kogo as the new chairman of CCT the same day he announced Omolola Oloworaran as the Director-General of the National Pension Commission (PenCom).

    Although the staff complained about the lull in the work of the tribunal since the controversy over Umar’s removal began, it was observed that corruption cases involving public servants are still being taken with several charges listed on the course list either for trial or arraignment.

    However, senior staff of the tribunal, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told Daily Trust that they are confused about who to work with as both men have spoken with them and they are only civil servants who obey instructions.

    “We are civil servants and we believe we can work with anyone that comes,” a staff said.

    “We have not seen any letter to the effect of these changes. We believe there is a procedure for the removal and appointment of a new chairman of the CCT.

    “We know that the president and the two arms of government have made pronouncements but we don’t know if invisible hands are working on these but we know there is a process,” he added.

    One of the officials said the process is for the appointee to go through the screening by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC), who recommends to the National Judicial Council (NJC) and then to the President, who approves and forwards to the Senate for confirmation.

    The senior official said there has been a pile of unattended files arising from a lack of clarity on the chairmanship of the tribunal.

    “He came today and left and the entire judiciary is now on holiday so we have taken the liberty to adjourn all the outstanding cases to January,” the witness said.

    However, a former staff of the tribunal, who pleaded anonymity, criticised Umar for visiting the office after his removal.

    “Why is he still coming to work seeking to sign some documents and approve payments to contractors?”

    He said Umar’s visits were illegal as he was no longer the chairman of the commission.

    After the presidential announcement removing Umar, both the Senate and the House of Representatives in separate plenaries on November 20 and 26, also endorsed his removal as CCT chairman on allegations of misconduct and corruption.

    Both resolutions were hinged on Section 17 (3) Part 1, Fifth Schedule of the Nigerian Constitution and Section 22 (3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act 2004 for the decision.

    The section provides that “A person holding the office of chairman or member of the code of conduct tribunal shall not be removed from his office or appointment by the president except upon an address supported by 2/3rd majority of each house of the national assembly praying that he be so removed for inability to discharge the functions of the office in question (whether arising from infirmity of mind or body) or for misconduct or for contravention of this code.”

    The legal dispute over Umar’s tenure is being tested in a suit before a Federal High Court in Abuja by the Community Rescue Initiative, Toro Concerned Citizens and Relief Foundation, who are contending that by the provisions of sections 1(1) and (3), 6(6), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph (3)(a) (vii) and (b) of the Third—Schedule thereof, the purported concurrence of both Senate and the House of Representatives was null, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever.

  • Edo guber petitions: Thuggery may ‘replace’ evidence at tribunal – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    Edo guber petitions: Thuggery may ‘replace’ evidence at tribunal – By Ehichioya Ezomon

    The days, weeks and months ahead may witness further clashes, and severer bloodletting between alleged political thugs of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Edo State, over petitions filed by dissatisfied seven parties to overturn the victory of the APC in the September 21, 2024, governorship election.

    There’re conflicting claims about the sympathy of the thugs in the Monday, December 9, 2024, attack during the inaugural sitting of the Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal at the High Court in Benin City. While some reports speak of clashes between the thugs, the APC and PDP have accused each other as the aggressors in the mayhem.

    The acting chairman of the Edo APC, Emperor Jarret Tenebe, alleged in a statement on December 10 that the party had alerted security agencies of the probable assault, noting, “despite our repeated efforts to alert the authorities ahead of this attack, the police ignored our warnings, leading to these senseless acts of violence.”

    Tenebe added: “These PDP thugs, who were in branded Asue Ighodalo’s T-shirts and caps, came with battle axes, bottles and other dangerous weapons, which they used freely on APC members, who did not provoke any fight. They took over the court premises and adjoining streets without resistance from the police. Several of our members and lawyers were injured, while the police failed to act decisively to stop the violence.”

    However, the Edo PDP caretaker committee chairman, Dr Tony Aziegbemi, accused the APC and Governor Monday Okpehbolo of “sending thugs after the PDP members, who were at the court,” adding, “It was clear that the APC and Governor Okpebholo sent thugs after the PDP members at the court. They were the aggressors and we have reported the case to the police.”

    On September 22, 2024, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Senator Monday Okpebholo (APC, Edo Central) as winner of the previous day’s election, with 291,667 votes, defeating the candidate of the PDP, Dr Asue Ighodalo, who polled 247,274 votes, and the Labour Party (LP) candidate, Olumide Akpata, who scored 22,763 votes.

    The PDP, which rejected the election while still in progress, has – along with the Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), Action Democratic Party (ADP), Allied Peoples Movement (APM), Social Democratic Party (SDP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) – filed petitions with the three-member tribunal, led by Justice Wilfred Kpochi, seeking to overturn the results, and declare its candidate, Ighodalo, the winner of the poll.

    One fact has emerged from the back-and-forth between the APC and PDP over the thugs’ attack, which’s that PDP supporters wore Asue Ighodalo-emblazoned T-shirts and face caps to the tribunal premises, provoking reactions from the APC members. But as, “The hood does not make the Monk,” donning Ighodalo’s campaign paraphernalia can’t influence the petitions at the tribunal, and shouldn’t have caused any conflict.

    From Election Day, the PDP and Ighodalo have claimed they won the poll “hands down,” referencing reported “votes tally” uploaded to the INEC Results Viewing (IReV) portal. But it alleged attempts by the APC to pressure INEC to manipulate the collated figures in its (APC’s) favour.

    The PDP national publicity secretary, Debo Ologunagba, urging INEC against conniving with the APC to suspend collation of results – as a precursor to changing the figures – warned of dire consequences “from aggrieved Edo voters,” reports The Guardian on September 22.

    “Intelligence available to the PDP indicates that the APC is mounting pressure on the INEC Chairman and Edo State Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) to suspend the collation process so as to make way for the manipulation of the INEC portal and replace the real results from the units with fabricated figures in favour of the APC,” Mr Ologunagba said in a statement.

    “INEC and the APC must note that any attempt to change the results of the Edo State governorship election will provoke worse consequences, as the people have indicated their readiness to use every means allowed in a democracy, including legitimate physical confrontation, if necessary, to protect their votes,” he added.

    But the APC, via its national publicity secretary, Felix Morka, urged the Edo voters to ignore the “fake results” by the PDP, as collation hadn’t even been concluded at the ward level. “Our great party wishes to clarify that collation at the ward level is still ongoing and has yet to be concluded. Certainly, local government level collation has yet to begin in most of the LGAs in the state let alone concluded,” Mr Morka said.

    “Consistent with the Electoral Act, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is the sole authorised body empowered to collate results at the Ward, Local Government and State levels, and to officially declare the result of the election,” he added.

    Similarly advising the public to await its final announcement, and disregard speculative results “being circulated on social media,” the INEC warned social media users, “announcing unverified results of the Edo gubernatorial election,” that the electoral body “has the authority to announce official election results.”

    The PDP’s sustained the propagation that it won the election, even after Okpebholo’s declaration as “Governor-elect,” and his swearing in as “Governor of Edo State” (with Deputy Governor Dennis Idahosa) on November 12, 2024.

    The PDP refrains include: “Asue Is Coming,” “We Are Going To Retrieve Our Stolen Mandate,” “Okpebholo Is Using A Stolen Mandate,” and “Okpebholo Is A Six-month Governor” – the latter message refers to the six months (180 days) allowed by the electoral laws for the tribunal to dispose of petitions before it.

    So, the onus is on the PDP and Ighodalo to prove the series of allegations of electoral malpractice by the triumvirate of APC, INEC and security agencies, to suppress reported PDP’s votes, and inflate APC’s scores in several council areas, and at the final tallying at the INEC headquarters in Benin City.

    Recall lately Governor Okpebholo’s accusation that PDP’s claim of securing majority votes at the election was juiced-up from a “fake IReV” purporting the figures to come from the official IReV portal for real-time sighting of poll results as they’re uploaded at the polling units.

    Okpebholo, on November 30, at a reception in his honour by the Esan people of Edo Central at Irrua, headquarters of Esan Central local council of Edo State, stated that, “The people, who wrote results and were announcing fake results on the internet, are the same people crying today that somebody rigged the election.”

    “It is sad to say that the criminals are crying today that they have lost, and will continue to lose,” Okpebholo said. “They are spending money day and night and wasting their money, and they will wait in vain. Edo people have spoken. They have chosen the path of development, peace, and unity. This is what Edo people have chosen, and that is how it will remain.”

    While the public expect the PDP and Ighodalo to prove that they – and not the APC and Okpebholo – won the September 21 governorship in Edo State, the election petitions tribunal, chairman, Justice Wilfred Kpochi, has asked all stakeholders, including political parties, parties in the suit, their supporters, counsel, security agencies, and the media to cooperate for a smooth and successful hearing.

    During the tribunal’s sitting on December 9, as reported by PUNCH on December 10, Justice Kpochi, with Justices A.B. Yusuf and A.A. Adewole, urged the counsel not to engage in unnecessary arguments that could lead to shouting, and jeopardising the convenient atmosphere in the court.

    “I am impressed by the conducive and calm environment I am seeing, and going forward, I will want this to continue,” Justice Kpochi said, adding, “I appeal to you all to let us put our eyes on the ball so that we can have serene proceedings. You have SANs (Senior Advocates of Nigeria) and very senior lawyers here, nobody is going to shout at you, (and) please, don’t also shout at us. If there are areas you feel not comfortable about, please draw our attention to it.”

    As Ken Mozia (SAN), one of the lead counsel for Ighodalo, pledged their commitment to the proceedings, “as long as other parties would do the same,” it’s to be seen what next the alleged party thugs will do, and how the Police will respond to such scenarios at subsequent sittings of the tribunal.

    It’s to be seen what next the alleged party thugs will do, and how the Police will respond to such scenarios at subsequent sittings of the tribunal, as the presence of security agents at the inaugural sitting didn’t deter the violent thugs from attacking party members and lawyers, injuring several persons in the process.

    More worrying is Edo APC’s avowal not to restrain its members from matching the antic of alleged PDP thugs in subsequent court dates, with the APC chapter chairman, Tenebe, declaring that in the circumstance of the alleged December 9 attack on APC’s members, “We are left with no option but to defend ourselves and also be on ground to arrest those we have identified as killers of Inspector Akor, some of whom also inflicted life-threatening injuries on our members today.”

    (Inspector Akor Onu, a security detail attached to then-Senator and APC governorship candidate, Okpebholo, was killed on July 18, 2024, at the entrance of the Benin Airport by alleged thugs, who attacked the convoys of Okpebholo and then-reinstated Deputy Governor Philip Shaibu as they arrived at the airport from Abuja. The APC alleged that the gunmen acted on behalf of the PDP, which vehemently denied the accusation, and that failure of the Police to bring the attackers to book “may have emboldened those who participated in Monday’s (December 9) attack” on APC’s members at the tribunal’s sitting.)

    Henceforth, the law enforcements must rein in any armed hoodlums from molesting innocent party members and lawyers attending the tribunal proceedings. No room for thuggery, but evidence to substantiate the issues in dispute!

     

    Mr Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria. Can be reached on X, Threads, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp @EhichioyaEzomon. Tel: 08033078357.

  • Ondo Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal receives 5 petitions

    Ondo Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal receives 5 petitions

    The Ondo State 2024 Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal has received five petitions challenging the declaration of Gov. Lucky Aiyedatiwa of All Progressives Congress (APC) as winner of the Nov. 16 election.

    INEC had, on Nov. 17, declared Aiyedatiwa winner of the election, having polled a total of 366,781 to defeat his closest rival, Agboola Ajayi of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who scored 117,846 votes.

    The APC and its candidate won in all the 18 local government areas of the state.

    Other respondents in the petitions are: APC, Aiyedatiwa and his running mate, Mr Olayide Adelami

    The five petitions challenging Aiyedatiwa’s victory were filed by Action Alliance and its candidate, Mr Abdullahi Olowokere, as well as Social Democratic Party (SDP) and its candidate, Chief Bamidele Akingboye.

    Others are: PDP and its candidate, Mr Agboola Ajayi, a former deputy governor of the state; Allied Peoples Movement (APM) and its candidate, Kolawole Ogunfeyimi, and African Democratic Congress (ADC) and its candidate, Mr Adeyemi Nejo.

    The petitioners are all seeking that the election held by INEC in the state on Nov. 16 should be declared invalid on grounds of non-compliance with the provisions of Electoral Act.

    Secretary of the tribunal, Mrs Nancy Zakayo, told NAN in an interview on Thursday that the petitions were filed on Dec. 7 and Dec. 8.

    Zakayo said that the provisions of the Electoral Act required that the petitions are served on the respondents, who after receipt of it, are to file their defence within the time frame provided.

    She said that in line with the provisions of the act, hearing of the petitions would not commence earlier than late January when parties must have exchanged all their processes.

  • Tribunal begins sitting on petitions filed against Okpebholo

    Tribunal begins sitting on petitions filed against Okpebholo

    The Edo State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal has began sitting in Benin and will hear seven (7) petitions challenging the victory of Governor Monday Okpebholo in the September 21 poll.

    The petitions were submitted by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and six other political parties. The other parties according to the cause list are the Accord Party, Action Alliance, Social Democratic Party, Allied Peoples Movement, Action Democratic Party, and Zenith Labour Party.

    In his inaugural address, Justice Wilfred Kpochi, Chairman of the three-member panel canvassed for the cooperation of all parties in the case, particularly the legal representations.

    Kpochi lauded the calmness in the courtroom, but raised concerns on the influx of parties supporters into the premises.

    “We will like to crave for your cooperation. I can see this place is calm and hope it will continue like this However, I saw many people outside and wondered what it was all about.

    “On my part, we will say we will cooperate with you. You are senior lawyers. Do not shout at us and we will not shout at you either. If you notice any issue, draw our attention and we will listen,” he said.

    Other members of the tribunal are Justices K. B. Yusuf and A. A. Adewole

    Responding, Ken Mozia, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), leading the PDP legal team, and Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, leading the Okpebholo’s team, promised that the parties would be professional in their trade before the tribunal.

    They assured the tribunal that the supporters would be engaged so as to ensure the place was not rowdy or create commotion throughout the judicial exercise.

    Subsequently, the PDP case against the governor went into pre-hearing, where all parties adopted their exchanged written responses.

    The tribunal adjourned until Dec. 18 for hearing of preliminary motions in this case as well as adoption of addresses of the six others.

  • Edo: Political parties disagree on election materials inspection

    Edo: Political parties disagree on election materials inspection

    PDP and APC have disagreed over the modalities and timing for the inspection of election materials used in the just concluded Edo governorship election.

    The election petition tribunal had ordered INEC to release all electoral materials used in the election to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate for inspection.

    The News Agency of Nigeria(NAN) reports that INEC had told political parties seeking  to inspect the materials used for the election to do so on Oct. 9.

    However, the inspection could not commence as planned due to an objection raised by the All Progressives Congress (APC), which argued that the voters’ register should be inspected first, before the BVAS machines.

    The APC also argued that since they were served with the schedule only a few minutes before the inspection, they did not bring their copy of the voters’ register.

    As a result, INEC postponed the inspection exercise until Thursday, Oct. 10.

    On Oct. 10, further complications arose when the State Chairman of the APC, Jarrett Tenebe, alleged that BVAS machines and voters’ registers had been brought into the INEC office using vehicles from the government house.

    Tenebe insisted that his party’s petition should be addressed before the materials inspection could commence.

    The argument was sternly rejected by representatives of the PDP, who insisted on the immediate commencement of the inspection.

    The PDP maintained that the APC’s petition could not supersede a valid court order and called for the inspection to begin.

    Due to the inability of the political parties, particularly the APC and PDP, to agree on the next steps, INEC adjourned the materials inspection indefinitely (sine die).

    Speaking to newsmen after the adjournment, Counsel to the APC, Barr. Victor Ohionsumua, stated that the APC would only return for the inspection once their petition had been addressed.

    Ohionsumua said APC Chairman submitted a petition to the state Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Dr Anugbum Onuoha, the Commissioner of Police, and the Department of State Services (DSS) on Oct. 10.

    “We (APC) observed that BVAS machines and voters’ registers entered INEC a few days ago in Edo state government vehicles.

    “Based on this, we raised an objection that the petition must be resolved before we can proceed with the materials’ inspection.

    “The INEC legal officer wanted to proceed with the inspection without directives from Dr Onuoha.

    “We insisted that we must hear from the REC and that our petition must be addressed before we move forward.

    “During this process, the INEC office became rowdy, and we began hearing gunshots outside the commission.

    “For security reasons, the INEC Director of Operations decided to postpone the inspection sine die and ask us to return to INEC Oct. 11,” he said.

    Reacting to the situation, the factional Chairman of the Labour Party (LP) in Edo, Comrade Kelly Ogbaloi, noted that the atmosphere at INEC’s head office was not conducive for the inspection to proceed.

    “The experience here is chaotic and not the right environment for such an important exercise to take place.

    “In my view, a level playing field should be provided for those contesting the outcome of the election.

    “As it stands, there is total disagreement between the APC and the PDP, and I do not believe any inspection will happen today,” he said.

  • Edo guber: Tribunal grants PDP’s request to inspect election materials

    Edo guber: Tribunal grants PDP’s request to inspect election materials

    The Edo Election Petition Tribunal on Monday granted the PDP and its candidate, Dr Asue Ighodalo request to inspect all election materials used for the Sept. 21 governorship election in the state.

    The Chairman of the tribunal, Justice W.I. Kpochi granted the order in an exparte motion filed by Ighodalo and the party.

    The exparte motion dated Sept. 27 was filed by Rotimi.O. Ogunseso, SAN, with Seun Olusuyi, counsel to the applicants.

    The petition and affidavits was sworn to by Osasere Adagbonyin. In the petition, all the prayers of the petitioners were granted by the tribunal.

    The Certified True Copy of the order signed by the Secretary of the tribunal, Mauzu Ibrahim, ordered INEC to produce and make available all the materials used for the election.

    The documents listed by the applicants and granted by the tribunal are all forms EC8A, forms EC8B, forms EC8C, forms EC8D, forms EC8E, forms EC25B, forms EC25B(i) used at the election.

    Also granted are all forms EC40A, forms EC40C, forms EC40G and EC40G(i) used at the gubernatorial election

    The court also ordered INEC to make all the polling unit results , Forms EC8A uploaded to its IREV portal from the poling unit, list of accredited agents of all the political parties that participated in the gubernatorial election.

    Others are, voters register for each of the polling units, total number of BVAS machines deployed to the poling units, serial number of each BVAS machines matched against the specific polling units.

    Other materials to be inspected included statement and report of the number of accredited voters recorded on and extracted directly from the BVAS machines used at all the polling units for the election.

    The tribunal further ordered INEC to produce and make available to the applicants record and list of polling units where election results were not uploaded to INEC IREV portal as at Sept. 22 when the results of the election were announced.

    It also directed that record of the posting of INEC adhoc staff for the 4,519 polling units, number of Permanent Voters Cards,( PVCs) collected in each polling units be made available to the applicants.

    Speaking to newsmen at INEC office in Benin, Olusegun Jolaawo, SAN, said they were at INEC Office in furtherance of the court order and the applicants’ attempt to get the electoral materials inspected

    According to Jolaawo, we came here today in furtherance of the tribunal order we obtained on Sept 29, 2024 and to get materials to fresh up our petition

    “Now, when we got here today, we were not able to get audience with the REC but we were able to see the head of legal unit, who told us that they were preparing a schedule for our inspection.

    “The risk involved is obvious to everybody, and the time expires on Saturday for us to file our petition and today is Monday,” he said.

  • Edo: I’ll definitely win at the tribunal – Ighodalo boasts

    Edo: I’ll definitely win at the tribunal – Ighodalo boasts

    The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate, Asue Ighodalo is confident of winning his case at the Edo State Election Petitions Tribunal.

    Ighodalo lost to Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) by a vote margin of 44,393 votes in the keenly contested September 21 governorship election.

    Ighodalo made this revelation in a chat with a national TV station on Thursday.

    While he polled 247,274 votes, Okpebholo garnered 291,667 votes. Olumide Akpata, the candidate of the Labour Party (LP), came a distant third with 22, 763 votes.

    He explained that his legal team has identified over 150 polling units that the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) was not deployed.

    “There is a lot of data, information, evidence that we have. We are fully confident that going through the tribunal, we will win the case.

    “We will regain our mandate and we are clear without any doubt that we are the winners of the election last Saturday,” he stated.

    During the show, the PDP candidate accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and police operatives of subverting the will of Edo people.

    According to Ighodalo, Edo people overwhelmingly voted for him and his party in last Saturday’s election.

    He alleged without evidence that the APC ruled the election in collaboration with electoral officials.

    “We didn’t rig. When APC and INEC saw that APC was losing woefully, they then subverted the electoral laws and the guidelines.

    “Collations are done at the polling units and then you go to the ward and then the local government collation centre and then the state. There was a jump, from ward straight to the state,” Ighodalo stated.