Tag: Ukraine

  • Russia bans oil exports to Ukraine

    Russia bans oil exports to Ukraine

    Russian Prime Minister, Dmitry Medvedev, on Thursday said Russia has banned exports of oil and petroleum products to Ukraine, as well as certain Ukrainian imports.

    Relations between the former Soviet neighbours have been at an all-time low since Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region in retaliation for Kiev ousting its Kremlin-backed president.

    Medvedev cast the new sanctions, which include bans on importing certain metals, consumer goods and equipment from Ukraine, as counter-measures for Ukrainian sanctions against Russia.

    “We are forced to protect our interests and strike back,’’ Medvedev said at a meeting of the cabinet of ministers, Russian state news agency, TASS reported.

    “Those Ukrainian imports that are now banned had amounted to about $250 million in 2018,’’ Medvedev added.

  • Reports of frosty relationship between Nigeria, Ukraine false – Enjoy

    Reports of frosty relationship between Nigeria, Ukraine false – Enjoy

    From Jonas Ike, Abuja

    The Ukrainian Ambassador to Nigeria Mr Valerii Akesandrik on Friday said that trust and cooperation still marks the relationship between Nigeria and Ukraine despite uncomplimentary media reports to the contrary.

    The envoy stated this when he paid a courtesy call on the Minister of Education Malam Adamu Adamu in in his office in Abuja.

    He said that both countries still enjoy fruitful relationship over the years and this is mostly in the area of education.

    According to the diplomat, most Nigerians living in Ukraine have enjoyed unfettered access to education as many universities in the country had graduated medical doctors and other professionals in other fields.

    He added that Nigeria is in need of an educated workforce and the Ukrainian authorities are willing to support our country to achieve this noble objective.

    In his remarks, the Minister who was represented by the Permanent Secretary Arc Sunny Echono said that Nigerians in Ukraine had taken advantage of the subsisting cordail relationship to improve on their education and other skills.

    He added that the visit by the top diplomat and his team would help to expand the opportunities for mutual cooperation in all fields and endeavours in both countries.

  • Verify authenticity of institutions before going to study medicine in Ukraine, FG warns students

    The Federal Government has advised Nigerian students intending to study medicine in Ukraine to verify the authenticity of the institution before enrolment.
    The Minister of Health, Prof. Isaac Adewole, gave the advice through the ministry’s Director, Media and Public Relations, Mrs Boade Akinola, in a statement issued on Tuesday in Abuja.
    Adewale said that the federal government was recently been notified by the Ukrainian Ministry of Health that it could not guarantee the quality of education delivered by the Odessa National Medical University.
    According to Wikipedia, the Odessa National Medical University is a government university in the city of Odessa, Ukraine.
    He noted that the decision by the Ukrainian Ministry of Health was based on the result of an International Monitoring Study of Quality of Higher Medical Education conducted in Ukrainian medical universities on March 25.
    The minister quoted the Ukrainian education ministry as saying that Odessa Medical University had exempted itself from the study by International Monitoring Study of Quality of Higher Medical Education in Ukraine.
    He, therefore, cautioned intending Nigerian students seeking admission to institutions in Ukraine to note the development before submitting their applications to the affected institution.

  • [BREAKING] Poland 2019: Nigeria draw USA, Qatar, Ukraine

    [BREAKING] Poland 2019: Nigeria draw USA, Qatar, Ukraine

    The Flying Eagles of Nigeria have been grouped alongside Ukraine, Qatar and the United States of Nigeria at the 2019 FIFA U-20 World Cup in Poland.

    The tournament will begin on May 23, 2019 and end on June 15, 2019 and will be held across six venues in Poland.

    Details Later…

     

  • Ukraine’s farcical drama – Owei Lakemfa

    By Owei Lakemfa.

    When the Ukrainian government, against warnings by Russia, this Sunday, sent a tug boat, the Yani Kapu, and two gunboats, the Nikopol and the Berdyansk into the Kerch Strait in the Crimea controlled by the latter, it could not have been hoping for a joyous reception.

    It could also not have hoped that the small naval ships would over run Russian positions in the waters which Russia had barricaded since September. The barricade had followed an earlier drama of a claim of sovereignty by the same ships enacted in the same waters. This time, Russia seized the three ships and two dozen sailors including the intelligence officers on board.

    What might be surprising is Ukraine’s cry of “provocation” by Russia. It is also claiming a Prisoner of War status for the sailors, while Russia is treating them as criminal trespassers.

    Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko’s act of sending the three naval ships to breach Russian military defences in the Crimean waters is like a child slapping an adult, and then crying that the latter is reacting. It is unclear why Poroshenko decided to provoke Russian reaction. It might be part of an understanding with the American-led North Atlantic Treaty Organsiation (NATO) to provoke war in the Black Sea.

    If this were the case, it means the Ukrainians learnt nothing from the five-day Russo-Georgian War. Georgia, led by President Mikheil Saakashvili believing that NATO would fight on its side, had in 2008, taken on the Russian Army. But NATO did not lift a finger, leaving the Georgians to be crushed by Russia. There is nothing to indicate today, that were war to break out between Ukraine and Russia, NATO would risk a Third World War by attacking Russia.

    On the other hand, the provocation could be part of Ukraine’s tactics to get the West impose fresh sanctions against Russia; but if it were to succeed in doing this, of what benefit will it be? What were the effects of earlier Western sanctions on Russia over the same Ukraine?

    Ukraine has enacted on the world stage a number of farcical drama presentations against Russia in order to turn the international community against its neigbour. So far, the most childish is the Tuesday, May 29, 2018 fake assassination of Russian exile journalist, Arkady Babchenko. The Ukrainian security services staged scenes in which the journalist was ‘shot’ three times, subsequently, declared dead and wheeled to the mortuary. The Ukrainian government went on to show footages of the alleged assassin, Valid Lurakhmanov, a ‘notorious Chechen hitman’. There was outrage across the world against Russia. A few days later, the Ukrainian Government produced Babchenko alive at a press conference saying it had faked the assassination for “propagandistic effect”.

    The Ukrainian government this Wednesday followed up its latest drama with an unrelated declaration of Marshall Law which it claims it introduced with the sole purpose of boosting Ukraine’s defence in the light of a growing aggression from Russia. While the state of emergency includes what it says is a partial mobilization and strengthening the country’s air defence and anti-terrorism measures, the government quite curiously included curtailing fundamental human rights in the measures. No such measures were introduced in 2014 and 2015 when the country witnessed an escalation of war in the Eastern part including the Crimea. It is not unlikely that the new law is aimed at curtailing the opposition as the Presidential elections approach.

    Stripped of all its melodrama, the real issue in contention is the Crimea which both countries claim. Crimea became part of the Russian Empire in 1783. So when the Russian Revolution took place in 1917, it was part of the successor Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Ukraine was also part of the Soviet Federation. In October 1921, Crimea became an autonomous Republic within the USSR. However, in 1946, it was stripped of this status, and in 1954, merged with Ukraine. As the USSR began to unravel in 1990, Crimea sought to regain its old status as an autonomous republic. But the process was still on when Ukraine became an independent country with Crimea, which has a 70 percent Russian stock, as an integral part.

    However, in the post-Cold War era, there was an ideological struggle with Eastern Ukraine being pro-Russia, and the rest of the country including the capital Kiev, leaning more to the West. These differences were reflected in the country’s elections. The 2004 Presidential elections resulted in a run-off in which Viktor Yanukovych a pro-Russian politician from the East was declared the winner. A protest in the capital Kiev followed. Called the Orange Revolution, the Presidential elections were upturned and the Supreme Court ordered new elections in which the rival candidate, Viktor Yushchenko was declared winner.

    However, Yanukovych again won the 2010 elections. This time, all agreed he was the clear winner and was sworn into office. However in 2014 there were again pro-West demonstrations in Kiev over the refusal of the government to sign a trade deal with the West; the Ukraine – European Union Association Agreement. Unlike the bloodless Orange Revolution protests, this was quite bloody with over 100 persons killed. This led to a coup in which President Yanukovych was ousted. He fled to Eastern Ukraine where the populace took up arms and declared themselves independent from the rest of the country. Half the Ukrainian soldiers stationed in the East defected to the side of the rebels and that war in which over 10,000 people have been killed, is still on.

    Crimea was part of the country that took up arms against the Kiev coup plotters. On May 25, 61 of the 64 parliamentarians at a sitting, voted for a referendum on autonomy, and 55 of them voted to remove the regional government. The Crimea population voted to rejoin Russia, and were accepted.

    The Ukrainian authorities claim that the votes in Crimea Parliament and the referendum were secured under duress and that the Crimea remains part of sovereign Ukraine. It is this sovereignty, Ukraine tried to assert by sending the three naval ships to the Kerch Strait in the Crimea.

    The disputes in Ukraine are likely to go on for a long time, but I think the country shot itself in the foot by using the populace of one part of the country to overthrow the legitimately elected government led by politicians from another part of the country. If Ukraine were to reunite, it will take more than the antics of the leadership in Kiev. For instance, it may need to consider the restoration of the Yanukovych administration as part of national reconciliation. If this seems far- fetched, so does the reunification of the country.

  • Ukraine bans entry to Russian adult men

    Ukraine has banned Russian adult men aged 16 to 60 years from entering Ukraine, the head of the border service, Petro Tsygykal, said in a televised meeting on Friday.

    “Today, the entry of foreigners is limited, primarily citizens of the Russian Federation – non-admission of citizens of the Russian Federation aged from 16 to 60, male,” Tsygykal said.

    Ukraine imposed martial law this week, citing fears that Russia was planning a full scale invasion after Russian vessels fired on and captured Ukrainian ships recently.

    On Thursday, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he hoped the international community could help calm tensions between Russia and Ukraine over a ship standoff near Crimea.

    Guterres urged Russia to respect “the territorial integrity of Ukraine’’ and “avoid the worst’’ after Russia seized Ukrainian naval ships and their crews in a dispute over maritime access.

    “I hope the situation can be contained without escalation and is calling for international efforts for meaningful dialogue,’’ the UN chief said.

    NAN

  • Ukraine under pressure after faking journalist’s death

    Ukraine was under fire Thursday after it admitted staging the murder of anti-Kremlin journalist Arkady Babchenko, despite relief in Russia and Ukraine that he was alive.

    Babchenko made a shock reappearance at a press conference in Kiev on Wednesday, less than 24 hours after the Ukrainian authorities reported he had been shot dead at his home in a contract-style killing blamed on Russia.

    Ukraine’s security services said his death was faked to foil an assassination plot by Moscow, but Russian officials reacted with anger to what they branded an “anti-Russian provocation”.

    The operation fooled the world’s media and angered press freedom groups which raised fears about the impact it could have on the work of journalists around the globe.

    – ‘Line between truth and fiction’ –

    “There can be no grounds for faking a journalist’s death,” the head of Reporters Without Borders Christophe Deloire said Wednesday, describing it as a “pathetic stunt”.

    “The first question is to what extent were there no alternatives to saving Babchenko’s life in this way,” analyst Igor Yakovenko wrote on his blog, adding there would inevitably be consequences to the high-profile fakery.

    An editorial in Russian daily Vedomosti argued the Babchenko operation “blurred the border between truth and fiction” and would lead to more distrust in the media.

    Several Western commentators and reporters said it would be difficult to trust official statements from Ukraine again.

    Babchenko, who told the press he had been preparing to stage his death with secret services for several weeks, dismissed the criticism.

    “I wish all these moralisers could be in the same situation — let them show their adherence to the principles of their high morals and die proudly holding their heads high without misleading the media,” he wrote on Facebook.

    Other commentators urged the media to focus on the fact that Babchenko is alive.

    “The main thing is that the killing of a journalist was foiled, the organisers are caught and the journalist is alive,” said Russian political commentator Evgeny Roizman.

    “Do not love an Arkady that is alive less than a dead one. In a hybrid war there are sometimes hybrid victims,” Russian journalist Boris Grozovsky wrote on Facebook.

    – ‘Millions celebrating’ –

    Kiev itself sought to justify the fake death that provoked an outpouring of grief and a diplomatic spat with its former masters in Moscow.

    “Thanks to this operation we were able to foil a cynical plot and document how the Russian security service was planning for this crime,” security service head Vasyl Grytsak said when he reintroduced Babchenko, alive and well, to the world.

    Grytsak said the authorities had arrested the alleged mastermind of a plot against Babchenko, saying a Ukrainian citizen named only as G. had offered to pay a hitman to carry out the killing after being recruited by Russian special forces and paid $40,000.

    Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko later met Babchenko and wrote triumphantly on Facebook that “millions of people are celebrating” the journalist’s return to life.

    Anton Gerashchenko, an adviser to Ukraine’s interior minister, likened the plot to a story from a crime novel, saying on Facebook that “Sherlock Holmes successfully used the method of staging his own death to efficiently solve complicated crimes”.

    But Moscow condemned the staged murder, with the foreign ministry saying: “Now the true motives are beginning to be revealed for this staging, which is totally, obviously yet another anti-Russian provocation”.

    – Put wife through ‘hell’ –

    At the press conference Grytsak thanked Babchenko and his family, who he said were in the loop about the secret operation.

    The reporter, however, apologised to his wife for putting her through “this hell she had to live through for three days… but there was no other option”.

    Babchenko, who has repeatedly said he faced death threats, vowed on Twitter to “die at 96 after dancing on Putin’s grave”.

    “God, it got so boring being dead,” he wrote. “Good morning.”

    – Series of killings –

    A number of Kremlin critics have been killed in Ukraine in recent years, with one gunned down on a Kiev street in broad daylight and another whose car exploded.

    Babchenko fought in Russia’s two Chechen campaigns in the 1990s and early 2000s before becoming a war correspondent and author.

    He has contributed to a number of media outlets including top opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta and is an avid blogger, accusing Russian authorities of killing Kremlin critics and unleashing wars in Ukraine, Syria and elsewhere.

    Babchenko left Russia in February 2017 after receiving threats, living first in the Czech Republic, then in Israel, before moving to Kiev.

    In recent years his increasingly bombastic posts pushed the boundaries of good taste and some of his colleagues and followers stopped reading him on Facebook.

    AFP

  • NATO angered by cyber attacks, mulls activating Article 5

    Jens Stoltenberg, Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), has said the alliance is gravely infuriated by the spate of ransomware cyber attacks that has rocked the globe.

    The NATO scribe said this at a press conference in Brussels on Wednesday, and insisted the Organization will not hesitate to take action by activating Article 5.

    Ukraine was hit the most by Petya — the latest global cyber attack –that is believed to have been designed to cause chaos rather than extort money, with Ukrainian officials fingering Russia.

    Russia has been alleged to be fighting an undeclared war with Ukraine in the east of the country and has been blamed for previous cyber attacks on Kiev, The Telegraph reported.

    Stoltenberg said NATO is providing help to Ukraine, and that the alliance will continue to do so, so that the country can bolster its cyber defence systems.

    “The attack in May and this week just underlines the importance of strengthening our cyber defences and that is what we are doing,” The Telegraph reports Stoltenberg as saying.

    “NATO helps Ukraine with cyber defence and has established a trust fund to finance programs to help Ukraine improve its cyber defences.

    “We will continue to do this and it is an important part of our cooperation,” the NATO scribe further stated.

    Stoltenberg said the North Atlantic Alliance had defined cyber defence as a NATO domain on a par with land, air, and sea operations, and would see similar planning and funding as a result, and that alliance members agreed last year that a cyber attack could trigger Article 5 of the north Atlantic treaty in the same way as a conventional military assault.

    The NATO scribe said further attacks on member countries could force the activation the alliance mutual defence clause.

    TheNewsGuru reports NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.

     

     

  • Macron meets Putin, no fiery handshake, hold talks on Syria, Ukraine

    France’s President Emmanuel Macron and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Monday vowed to improve the strained relations between their countries, while admitting to disagreements during talks at Versailles palace described by Macron as “extremely frank”.

    Their first meeting since Macron took office provided another test of the Frenchman’s diplomatic skills after his memorable first encounter last week with US President Donald Trump that Macron sealed with a vice-like handshake.

    This time the handshake was warmer but the tone guarded after an hour of talks on the 300th anniversary of a visit to Versailles by tsar Peter the Great.

    Putin admitted to some differences of opinion in the talks which covered issues including the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine, but insisted that Franco-Russian ties withstood “all points of friction”.

    “We disagree on a number of things but at least we discussed them,” Macron said.

    “Our absolute priority is the fight against terrorism and the eradication of terrorist groups and Daesh in particular,” he said, using an alternate name for the Islamic State group that has claimed several deadly attacks in France.

    – “Organs of propaganda” –

    The newly elected French leader called for a stronger partnership with Russia on Syria, one of the sticking points in relations between the West and Moscow which backs the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

    Macron advocated “a democratic transition that preserves the Syrian state”, warning that “failed states” in the Middle East were a threat to the West.

    But in an apparent warning to Assad and Russia, he said the use of chemical weapons in Syria would be a “red line” for his presidency and would draw an “immediate response” from France.

    The pair discussed the Western sanctions imposed on Russia over its military involvement in Ukraine as well as allegations of Russian meddling in France’s election campaign.

    Putin declared that the sanctions were “in no way” helping to end the fighting between government forces and Kremlin-backed rebels in Ukraine’s east.

    The Russian strongman, who hosted Macron’s far-right rival Marine Le Pen for talks during the election race, also shrugged off allegations that Russian hackers infiltrated Macron’s campaign.

    “Maybe they were Russian hackers, maybe they were not,” he said, dismissing the claims as unsubstantiated.

    Macron, for his part, expressed anger at reports by pro-Kremlin media during the election questioning his sexuality and links to high finance.

    He took aim at the Russia Today broadcaster and Sputnik agency, calling them “organs of influence and propaganda”.

    – ‘No concessions’ –

    Putin’s visit comes after the 39-year-old French centrist made a successful debut on the world stage last week, holding his own against Trump at a NATO summit in Brussels and at a G7 summit in Italy.

    Ahead of the visit, Macron told a French weekly that he was not “bothered” by leaders who “think in terms of power dynamics”.

    He said he would make “not a single concession” to Russia on the long-running conflict in Ukraine, with he and his G7 counterparts saying they were prepared to strengthen sanctions against Moscow.

    Since the start of the war in Ukraine in 2014, Russia has flexed its muscles with a series of war games involving tens of thousands of troops in areas bordering NATO Baltic states.

    Macron said he, Putin and the leaders of Germany and Ukraine would meet soon for talks, “which will allow us to make a complete evaluation of the situation”.

    – Modernising tsar –

    Western powers charge Russia with failing to honour its commitments under the Minsk accords framework for ending the violence in Ukraine.

    France helped spearhead the sanctions, which have seriously dented EU-Russia trade.

    Putin moved quickly after the French election to try to smooth things over, congratulating Macron and urging him to work to overcome their countries’ “mutual distrust”.

    Monday’s visit comes seven months after Putin cancelled a trip to Paris amid a row over Syria with Macron’s predecessor Francois Hollande, who had said Russia’s bombing of Aleppo could amount to war crimes.

    In Versailles, he and Macron inaugurated an exhibition marking the visit of Russia’s modernising tsar Peter the Great to France in 1717.

    The fervently pro-Europe Macron said his invitation to Putin aimed to showcase “a Russia which is open to Europe”.

    Putin was also later to visit a new Orthodox cathedral complex in central Paris.

     

     

    Mail Online