Tag: Ukraine

  • Epitaph for the living – By Owei Lakemfa

    A NUMBER of European leaders harbour the quixotic thought that as the first year of the War in Ukraine rolls by today, February 24, 2023, the Ukrainians will militarily defeat Russia. They prefer a continuation of the war, and, their writing the epitaph of Russian and Ukrainian youths who will be killed, rather than allow a peaceful resolution. However, as they are fixated on a military conquest, related events suggest that the European and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, NATO, alliance may crack partly due to the terrorist attacks on the Nord Stream gas pipelines linking Russia with Germany.

    The United States, US, has been pointedly accused by one of the most famous journalists in the world, 85-year-old Seymour Hersh, of carrying out these terrorist attacks in the Baltic Sea. The US has, curiously, been virtually silent while the United Nations, UN, says it will not lead any investigation to unravel the culprits.

    French President Emmanuel Macron on February 18 made an ambiguous statement that he wants Russia defeated but not crushed. According to him: “I want Russia to be defeated in Ukraine, and I want Ukraine to be able to defend its position…I am convinced that, in the end, this will not conclude militarily.” He added that neither side could fully prevail and does not want the war to spread to Russian territory. Macron does not come out clear on who he wants to defeat Russia: NATO or Ukraine?

    I am sure he knows that it would be militarily impossible for Ukraine to overrun Russia, so he might simply be priming that country for more unnecessary deaths rather than engage in negotiations to end the war. Perhaps Macron and his fellow European leaders simply want to wear out Russia and make it vulnerable. Also, they may hope that elongating the war can lead to a coup in Russia. But they should realise that this can also happen in Ukraine.

    Three days later, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, while not ruling out peace talks, declared that any peace that entails the surrender of Ukraine cannot be real. Italy, she said, is considering sending more air-defence systems to Ukraine, but ruled out the supply of military planes. In other words, Italy wants conditional discussions. The Foreign Ministers of seven countries: Germany, Canada, France, Japan, US, United Kingdom and Italy in a joint statement offered Ukraine more support and additional sanctions against Russia.

    President Joe Biden, who visited Ukraine, announced a new military aid package worth $500 million for Ukraine to continue the war. He vowed: “Ukraine will never be a victory for Russia.” Buoyed by such support, myopic Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky ruled out peace talks, declaring: “Dialogue is useless.” Rather, he told Biden: “Together, we are going to a common victory and we must ensure it this year.”

    In reaction, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that his country is pulling out of nuclear talks with the US. However, while the focus is on military victory or defeat, the terrorist attacks on the Nord Stream pipeline that can transport 55 billion cubic meters of gas from Russia to Europe, may begin to redefine the NATO alliance as Germany, Sweden and Denmark who are investigating the incident are livid. They have established that the damage to the pipelines was caused by “powerful explosions due to sabotage”, and have taken their case to the UN.

    They complain that the attacks caused “substantial and worrisome” effects in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Russia, backed by China, has also demanded a UN probe and has approached the UN Security Council for an independent inquiry.

    However, a February 15, 2023 investigative report by Hersh concluded that the terrorist attacks were carried out by the US Navy, the American Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, and the Norwegian Navy. He reported that in June 2022, US Navy divers under the cover of a multi-nation war-games simulation known as BALTOPS 22, placed explosive C4 charges on the pipelines. The explosives he claims, were detonated remotely three months later by a signal from a sonar buoy.

    Hersh said the attacks were desperate American moves, adding: “The fear of losing European support in the Ukraine conflict made the US to take out the only option Europe had should it want to restart buying fuel from Russia.” The US, he said, is afraid that Europe could have a rethink on the Ukrainian conflict, decide to make peace and resume its oil and gas trade with Russia.  He said the attacks were to “cut into the notion that they (Europeans) can depend totally on America, even in a crisis”. The US, he wrote, has always wanted to stop Russia selling oil and gas to the rest of Europe.

    The White House’s reaction was to describe Hersh’s report as “complete nonsense”. However, it has made no public efforts to debunk the facts contained in the report, including the military exercise or the claimed agencies and means used. A major headache for the US is that Hersh is one of the most famous journalists in the world and one of the most decorated in American history. He is a four-time winner: 1969, 1973, 1974, and 1981, of the George Polk Award. This prestigious award goes to “the intrepid, bold, and influential work of the reporters themselves, placing a premium on investigative work that is original, resourceful, and thought-provoking”.

    In 1970, he won the Pulitzer Prize, a prize established in 1917 for America’s best in print journalism, literary achievement, and musical composition. He is also a two-time winner of the National Magazine Award, and the 2004 George Orwell Award. Undoubtedly, one of the outcomes of the Ukrainian War is that it has made Europe far less reliant on Russian oil and gas. Ironically, Russia has ready markets for these commodities, especially in China and India. Another is the enormous sanctions the EU is capable of imposing on a country. The reverse side is that Russia has demonstrated that sanctions can also strengthen an economy. For instance, the Ruble in 2022 rather than become weak under the weight of sanctions, actually gained strengthen, and became the most improved currency in the world in terms of value.

    Also, while the West thought it was tightening the noose around Russia by using international finance systems, alternative systems were being promoted by the BRICS nations comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Interestingly, in the past year of sanctions against Russia, at least a dozen countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Bahrain, Algeria, Argentina, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, have expressed interest in joining BRICS. It is in the collective interests of humanity to end the war in Ukraine by peaceful means because a military solution will be too costly, harmful and unpredictable.

  • Zelensky says Macron wasting his time with Putin

    Zelensky says Macron wasting his time with Putin

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has rejected remarks by his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron on keeping the door open for dialogue with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

    Zelensky told Monday’s edition of the Corriere della Sera newspaper and two other Italian dailies that “this will be a useless dialogue.”

    “The truth is that Macron is wasting his time. I have come to the conclusion that we are not in a position to change Russia’s behaviour,’’ he said.

    Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is expected to make her first visit to Kiev soon.

    The far-right politician expressed support for arms deliveries to Ukraine before her election victory in September last year.

    In contrast, her two coalition partners, Matteo Salvini of the right-wing League party and Silvio Berlusconi of the conservative Forza Italia have repeatedly made pro-Russian statements.

    Failure in the Russian offensive in Ukraine is likely to increase tensions within the Russian leadership, according to British defence intelligence experts on the Ukraine war in London on Monday.

    According to the defence ministry update, Russia remains on the offensive on several fronts, including the eastern Ukrainian towns of Bakhmut and Vuhledar with heavy losses in some cases.

    The ministry said two elite Russian units in Vuhledar had been worn down to such an extent that they were no longer operational.

    The Russian military is under pressure to present successes on the first anniversary of the start of the war on February 24, the assessment indicated.

    However, if the spring offensive fails to achieve anything, British intelligence believes that tensions will likely increase within the Russian leadership.

  • RUSSIA/UKRAINE WAR: Former UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson seeks support for Ukraine

    RUSSIA/UKRAINE WAR: Former UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson seeks support for Ukraine

    Following the Russian attack faced by Ukrainians, the former UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, has said the only way to end the war in Ukraine is for the country to win.

    Mr Johnson, who on Sunday travelled to the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, was received by Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.

    The Conservative MP said it was a “privilege” to visit the country at the invitation of Mr Zelensky.

    Former UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson travels to Ukrainian capital Kyiv

    During Mr Johnson’s visit to Ukraine, he was received by Mr Zelensky and other Ukrainian ministers in Kyiv.

    This is the moment to double down, and to give the Ukrainians all the tools they need to finish the job

    “I welcome Boris Johnson, a true friend of Ukraine, to Kyiv. Boris thanks for your support!” wrote Mr Zelensky on Telegram.

    He also visited the towns of Bucha and Borodyanka, to the north-west of Kyiv, which were occupied by Russian forces in March last year.

    After Russian troops were repelled, scenes of mass destruction were discovered in the two towns, including the bodies of civilians strewn along a street in Bucha.

    Mr Johnson said “the suffering of the people of Ukraine has gone on for too long. The only way to end this war is for Ukraine to win – and to win as fast as possible, This is the moment to double down, and to give the Ukrainians all the tools they need to finish the job. The sooner Putin fails, the better for Ukraine and for the whole world.”

    Former UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson travels to Ukrainian capital Kyiv

    Current UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was said to be “supportive” of Mr Johnson’s visit.

    Mr Sunak is “always supportive of all colleagues showing that the UK is behind Ukraine and will continue to support them,” his press secretary said.

    Mr Johnson’s visit comes as increased pressure is being put on allies of Ukraine, including Germany, to supply more tanks to the war-torn country.

  • Ukraine’s top govt officials killed in helicopter crash

    Ukraine’s top govt officials killed in helicopter crash

    The three main figures in Ukraine’s interior ministry have been killed in a helicopter crash beside a nursery in an eastern suburb of the capital Kyiv.

    Interior Minister Denys Monastyrsky, 42, died alongside his first deputy minister and state secretary.

    Nine people were killed when the helicopter came down in Brovary and another nine died on the ground, including three children.

    Mr Monastyrsky is the highest profile Ukrainian casualty since the war began.

    The deputy head of Ukraine’s presidential office, Kyrylo Tymoshenko, said the minister had been en route to a war “hot spot” when his helicopter went down.

    There is no indication the crash was anything other than an accident, although witnesses said Russia’s war was to blame for the disaster.

    “It was very foggy and there was no electricity, and when there’s no electricity there are no lights on the buildings,” local resident Volodymyr told the BBC.

    The 42-year-old interior minister was a prominent member of President Volodymy Zelensky’s cabinet. He played a key role in updating the public on casualties caused by Russian missile strikes since Ukraine was invaded in February 2022.

  • War: Russia, Belarus form military alliance

    War: Russia, Belarus form military alliance

    Following concerns that Minsk the Capital of Belarus is being dragged into the Ukraine conflict to fight alongside Moscow, the two neighbouring countries started  a joint air force

    According to Minsk’s defence ministry  “joint tactical flight drills of aviation units” from Belarus and Russia had

    started.

    The drills is expected to last till February 1st, 2023.

    “The main goal of the exercise is to increase operational compatibility in the joint performance of combat training missions,” the ministry said in a statement.

    Minsk assured that all military airfields in Belarus will be involved in the drills

    The ministry added that the exercises will involve training in aerial reconnaissance, joint patrolling of the state border, tactical air assault landing, the delivery of goods and evacuation of wounded.

    Officials have described the drills as defensive.

  • US to support Ukraine with $2.8 billion in military assistance

    US to support Ukraine with $2.8 billion in military assistance

    As the conflict between  Russian and Ukraine continues, the United States has announced a new military aid to Ukraine.

    According to Blinken Antony, the US Secretary of State, on Friday, said the $2.85 billion drawdown in military assistance will include; “Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, artillery systems, armored personnel carriers, surface-to-air missiles, ammunition, and other items to support Ukraine as it bravely defends its people, its sovereignty, and its territorial integrity.”

    The top US diplomat said the administration would work with Congress “to provide an additional $907 million of Foreign Military Financing under the Additional Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2022.”

    “Funds will support Ukraine and countries impacted by Russia’s war in Ukraine,” Blinken said in a statement.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky took to Twitter to welcome “the all-time US defense aid package.”

    “Thank you, POTUS for the completely new weaponry, incl Bradley vehicles, anti-aircraft missiles. It’ll strengthen Ukrainian Army on a battlefield. Awesome Christmas present for Ukraine! Together with the American people we’re approaching a common victory,” he wrote.

  • As Peace Eludes the Weak in a World of the Strong, Welcome to 2023 – By Dennis Onakinor

    As Peace Eludes the Weak in a World of the Strong, Welcome to 2023 – By Dennis Onakinor

    By midnight of December 31st, 2022, joyous sound of fireworks will reverberate through the skies of most towns and cities across the world in celebration of the dawn of 2023. But for the people of Ukraine, it will be the now-familiar sound of fire from machine guns, tanks, artillery, missiles, jet fighters, and bombers, which signify nothing but death, destruction, and misery. For, since Vladimir Putin’s war machine rumbled into their country on February 24, 2022, Ukrainians have known no peace.

    While most people are still aghast at the occurrence of this conflagration in a 21st Century European society, Russia continues to intensify its indiscriminate bombardment of Ukrainian towns and cities. And, from the plethora of related analysis, an incontrovertible fact emerges: that Ukraine would not have been exposed to Russian military aggression if the country had not given up the nuclear weapons it inherited from the defunct Soviet Union, in accordance with the terms of the “1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances.”

    “Might is right,” wrote the German-born American Anarchist, Ragnar Redbeard, in his 1896 publication of same title, aka “Survival of the Fittest.” Drawing from Social Darwinism, and deploying virulent incendiary language, Redbeard denounced all Judeo-Christian principles of rights and wrongs, and condemned modern societal principles of justice, equity, morality, etc. Hear him:

    “Blessed are the strong, for they shall possess the earth; cursed are the weak, for they shall inherit the yoke … Blessed are the bold, for they shall be masters of the world; cursed are the humble, for they shall be trodden under hoofs … Human rights and wrongs are not determined by justice, but by might … Each molecule, each animal, fights for its life … the survival of the strongest is the iron law of history.”

    President Putin may not have read Redbeard’s “Might is Right,” but as an irredentist, who glorifies Russia’s military might at every opportunity, he certainly understands that in international relations power plays a dominant role. For, whenever he discusses his Ukrainian war casus belli, he never fails to accuse the US of unbridled exhibition of military power across the globe. Whereas, if the truth were to be told, Russia stands condemned for same exhibition of military power by its unprovoked aggression against its neighbour.

    In course of announcing the annexation of occupied Ukrainian regions of Donesk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye on September 30, 2022, Putin accused the US of being “the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan.” He went further to state that in course of the 2nd World War, the US and Britain reduced most German cities to rubble because, just like the nuclear bombing of the two Japanese cities, they wanted to “intimidate our country and the rest of the world.”

    Viewed from the perspective of Cold War political currents, Putin might be right that the US had always sought to resolve international conflicts through unilateral military action, as it did in Grenada in 1983, Libya in 1986, and Panama in 1989. But even so, post-2nd World War history is replete with instances of display of military might by the super powers, with the US setting the tone in its 1960 – 1975 military intervention in Vietnam. The Soviet Union followed suit in its 1979 – 1989 occupation of Afghanistan, while the US once again showcased itself in Iraq between 2003 – 2011. Suffice to say that both powers were dealt humiliating blows in course of their military adventurism.

    Be that as it may, Russia’s ongoing brutal and barbaric military campaign in Ukraine belies President Putin’s accusation against the US’ conduct during the 2nd World War. As witnessed by the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), Russian forces have shown utter disregard for the sanctity of human lives in course of their punitive military campaign, as they leave a trail of mass graves, smouldering ruins, and human misery in their wake.
    Truly, occurrences in the ongoing war had been predicted by analysts, including Yours Sincerely (see The News Guru article titled “Ukraine Crisis: War is Not Inevitable if Preventive Diplomacy is on the Cards”). For instance, it was noted that Ukraine’s inferior armed forces would be unable to repel Russia’s invading forces without the direct intervention of their NATO partners; and that restriction of hostilities to Ukraine’s territory would only serve to heighten Russia’s unwillingness to end its aggression, since its civilian population will not be directly impacted by the war.

    Indeed, Ukrainian forces are presently unable to respond to Russia’s missile barrage because the US and its NATO allies have refused to provide them with long-range weapons – a situation occasioned by Putin’s threat to resort to nuclear weapons in the event of Ukraine being provided with military capabilities that could pose “existential threat” to the Russian “motherland.” It’s a scenario akin to a boxing fight in which one of the boxers has one of his hands firmly tied behind his back. For how long will the rest of the world allow this pitiable situation to prevail in the Ukrainian war?

    In light of the foregoing, the self-ruled Pacific Island of Taiwan must tread cautiously as it confronts a revanchist China in asserting its independence status, which is not officially recognized by most countries of the world, including the US that has “committed” to protecting her against Chinese military aggression. But, while the US may readily arm Taiwan against Chinese aggressive designs, the Ukrainian war has shown that mere possession of arms is not enough for a militarily-inferior entity to tip the scales of war against a global military power.

    “Will the US defend Taiwan against Chinese military invasion?” Asked by a reporter at a joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida on May 22, 2022, President Joe Biden responded: “That’s the commitment we made … we agree with ‘One China’ policy. We signed onto it and all the attendant agreements made from there. But the idea it (Taiwan) could be taken by force, it’s just not appropriate. It’ll dislocate the entire region and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine. And so, it’s a burden that is even stronger.”
    But even so, the Taiwanese authorities must seek concrete guarantees from the US and other allies, that any armed conflict with China would not be restricted to Taiwanese territory, but will be extended to the Chinese mainland through every available means. In essence, it will not be a one-sided affair involving the destruction of Taiwanese towns and cities by Chinese forces. Otherwise, such a military confrontation is totally unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.

    But even at that, all parties to the simmering Sino-Taiwanese conflict should work relentlessly towards resolving it diplomatically, rather than seek a military solution. Particularly, Taiwanese leaders must realize that pacifist diplomacy is not synonymous with unpatriotism and cowardice, and that war serves no useful purpose other than the benefits that accrue to the global military-industrial complex, represented by vicious arms dealers, unscrupulous mercenaries, profiteers, and sundry base elements.

    Unfortunately, most states have imbibed the erroneous notion that exhibition of military might deters external aggression. With North Korea seemingly getting away with its provocative nuclear sabre-rattling and missile tests, countries like Iran have certainly concluded that acquisition of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems is the only effective deterrence against adversarial threats. And, going by occurrences in Ukraine, where Russian military might is proving right, Iran and its ilk might just be right.

  • Ukraine–Nigeria: Reign of grand illusionists – By Owei Lakemfa

    Ukraine–Nigeria: Reign of grand illusionists – By Owei Lakemfa

    PRESIDENT Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine was in Washington, where, in a speech to the American Congress on December 21, 2022, he rehearsed some of his daily speeches back home. One thread I picked were his claims that the war with Russia is about democracy and that its outcome will determine whether humanity lives in a world of “democracy” or not.

    He said the American expenditure in the Ukrainian War is not charity, but an “investment in global security and democracy”. The deception that the war is about democracy has been picked up in social media, where we are urged to take sides with Ukraine because its war with Russia is “a global fight for democracy”. In reality, the Ukrainian crisis, which has erupted into the Russo-Ukrainian War, was precipitated by Ukraine’s extreme right, which repeatedly rejected the ballot box, resulting in two bloody coups and the subsequent decision of Eastern Ukraine to secede.

    Ukraine was an integral part of Russia which, by a majority of 92.3 per cent, approved the August 24, 1991 Declaration of Independence. It decided that the ballot box would decide who presides over its affairs. The turning point came in the 2004 elections, when the pro-Russian candidate from Eastern Ukraine and former Governor of Donetsk, Viktor Yanukovych, won the December 26 re-run elections, beating his rival, Viktor Yushchenko. He was subsequently declared the winner.

    However, some forces that preferred a pro-West leader, rejected him and mobilised protests in the capital Kiev, which is in the north central region. The president-elect could not effectively counter these protests as his support base was in the eastern Ukrainian areas of Kharkiv, Luhansk, and Donetsk. These protests, which were christened the ‘Orange Revolution’ led to the annulment of the election. In the new elections, the  former loser, Yushchenko, was declared the winner.

    Yanukovych ran again in the 2010 elections, sweeping the polls. This time he was sworn in. Three years into his presidency, his government rejected a European Union agreement. Rather, it chose closer ties with Russia. Again, the pro-West elements staged rounds of protests in Kiev, christening it “Euromaidan”. There were counterprotests in other parts of the country, especially in the East.

    On  February 21, 2014, President Yanukovych who claimed there was an assassination attempt on his life, fled Kiev for exile in Russia. This was the second coup, and the Ukrainians in the east rejected this coup and opted for armed secession. There were two international peace accords in Minsk to end the conflicts, but the new authorities in Kiev refused to implement them. Instead, they preferred to continue their assault on Eastern Ukrainians and join NATO as a guarantee that Russia will not intervene militarily to help its supporters in Eastern Ukraine. Given these facts, how can the Ukrainian War be sold as one for global democracy?

    However, that is the nature of the Western propaganda that is being forced down the throats of many countries. Nigeria is one of these targets, with an entire television station dedicated to uploading Ukrainian propaganda on Nigerians on a daily basis, with no regulatory or professional media bodies blinking an eye.

    In this daily invasion of our homes, this media assaults Nigerians with Ukrainian propaganda in the guise of news and news analysis. It is like packaging cigarettes as candies and, therefore, failing to inscribe the warning that smoking is dangerous to health as it causes cancer, stroke, diabetes, heart disease, and chronic bronchitis. Even if this media does not disclose who funds this project, professionally, it ought to indicate that it is an advertisement, so viewers can be advised.

    Unfortunately, even respectable diplomats are involved in this marketing gambit. For instance, Ambassador Joseph. U. Ayalogu, Nigerian and former permanent representative  to the United Nations in Geneva and our one time ambassador to Switzerland, lent his credibility to such inanities.

    Let me first clarify that he has a right to support Ukraine. I also will not begrudge him for insisting that there should be no peace talks until Russia fully withdraws from Ukraine. However, what I object to is his misinforming and misleading the Nigerian public that, although difficult, Russia can be expelled from the United Nations and the UN Security Council for engaging in war with its neigbour.

    I consider Zelensky, who made the request, an uninformed propagandist and illusionist. Even his American allies chuckled when he made the request. I did not, therefore, expect an experienced diplomat who was also Nigeria’s expert at the UN to take the Zelensky request seriously or declare it “quite rightly”. The least I expected of Ambassador Ayalogu, is to be conversant with the United Nations Charter, which is an 8,907-word document. I am convinced he is, so why he chooses to misinform the Nigerian populace is baffling.

    Let me simply state that Russia, as a Permanent Member of the UNSC with veto power, cannot even be suspended, let alone expelled, as the respected Ambassador Ayalogu claims. My authority is the UN Charter. On expulsion, Article 6 of the Charter states that: “A Member of the United Nations who has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organisation by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

    The issue is how you get the Security Council to recommend the expulsion of its permanent members when each of the Big Five — the United States, France, the United Kingdom, China and Russia has the power to veto whatever decision is taken, either by the Council or all members of the UN for that matter.

    On veto power, Article 27 (3) of the Charter states: “Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members, including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.” The   Chapter VI and Article 52 referred to are not binding resolutions.

    Does Ambassador Ayalogu expect Russia to vote for its own expulsion? Is that how diplomacy is run; that an entity will be expected to vote for its own liquidation? This is, of course, not the only hare-brained proposal on this matter. There is another that claim that when the Charter was made in 1945, there was no Russian Federation in existence; that what was existing was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or USSR. So with the disintegration of the USSR, Russia automatically lost its membership in the UN. So it should simply go home and apply for membership.  Welcome to the world of grand illusionists.

  • UKRAINE: Zelensky begs G7 for extra gas, weapons to survive brutal winter

    UKRAINE: Zelensky begs G7 for extra gas, weapons to survive brutal winter

    President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, on Monday, urged G7 nations to provide extra gas and weapons to help Ukrainians survive a brutal winter that threatens to bring further suffering to millions in the war-torn country.

    With snow on the ground and Ukraine’s energy grid battered by Russian strikes, many are facing freezing temperatures without power or heating.

    During a video conference with the G7 club of wealthy nations on Monday, Zelensky said Ukraine needs “about two billion cubic metres” of additional gas to get through the winter.

    He also urged the G7 to send more arms to Ukraine, including “modern tanks” as well as “rocket artillery and more long-range missiles”.

    Western-supplied weapons have helped turn the tide in the war, and a senior US military official said Monday that Russia is likely turning to older, less reliable artillery and rocket ammunition as its newer stocks run low.

    But Zelensky said “Russia still has the advantage in artillery and missiles.”

    “This is a fact,” he told the G7. “These capabilities of the occupying army are the ones to fuel the Kremlin’s arrogance”.
    Zelensky begs G7 for extra gas, weapons to survive brutal winter
    Meanwhile, in the strategic Ukrainian port of Ochakiv, officials are hoping the Black Sea naval base can serve to consolidate Kyiv’s gains in the southern Kherson region.

    After failing to seize the port, Russian troops have been pummelling Ochakiv from the nearby Kinburn peninsula.

    In the fog at the local market, 62-year-old Oleg Klyutshko said: “I am not afraid of winter… but I would like the strikes to stop. We will survive anything else.”

    Kyiv says 40 percent of Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure has been damaged, with wave after wave of targeted Russian attacks.

    The Ukrainian energy ministry said in a statement that Russian missiles had hit all of the country’s thermal power plants, while 44 overhead high-voltage power lines had also been affected.

    Power company YASNO said supply limitations in Kyiv were “significant” with some 40 percent of supplies diverted to critical infrastructure.

    Oil and gas company DTEK said its specialists were “constantly looking for equipment to restore the energy infrastructure destroyed by Russia” and had agreed on contracts with European suppliers ABB and Siemens.

    According to a readout issued by his office, Zelensky told the G7 “the terror against our power plants forced us to use more gas than expected”.

    “This is why we need additional support over this particular winter,” he said.

    The G7 groups Britain, Canada, France, Germany — which currently holds the club’s presidency — Italy, Japan and the United States.

    G7 leaders agreed on key elements of a platform to coordinate financial support for Ukraine, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said, before a summit in Paris on post-war reconstruction.

    Zelensky also proposed a special summit, which he called the Global Peace Formula Summit, “to determine how and when we can implement the points of the Ukrainian Peace Formula,” which would secure Ukraine’s security and territorial integrity.
    Zelensky begs G7 for extra gas, weapons to survive brutal winter

    He invited the G7 industrialized nations “as well as other conscientious countries” to “show your leadership”.

    The Ukrainian leader also urged Russia “to take a concrete and meaningful step towards a diplomatic settlement”.

    Zelensky called on “the occupier” Moscow to leave Ukrainian territory by Christmas.

    “The one who brought the war upon us has to take it away.”

    ‘Rethink’ nuclear security
    An international conference hosted by France will kick off in Paris on Tuesday.

    The gathering of politicians, blue-chip companies and aid agencies will focus on how Ukraine’s Western allies can provide immediate support to keep its civil infrastructure afloat amid incessant bombing by Russia.

    Speaking ahead of Tuesday’s meeting, Ukraine’s energy minister German Galushchenko said in an interview that the war with Russia “completely changes our understanding of nuclear security”.

    He pointed to Russia’s seizure of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant — Europe’s largest atomic facility — which has raised alarm among Western allies as shelling has continued in the area throughout the nearly 10-month conflict.

    “This situation absolutely pushes us to rethink what we should do from the point of view of (nuclear) safety. That’s a question, too, to all the countries of the world,” Galushchenko said.

  • Zelensky warns of more Russian attacks before 2023

    Zelensky warns of more Russian attacks before 2023

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned the people of his country of further Russian attacks in the few remaining days of 2022.

    “We must be aware that our enemy will try to make this time dark and difficult for us,” he said in his daily video address on Sunday evening.

    He said Russia had lost everything it could lose this year, adding: “But it is trying to compensate for its losses with the cunning of its propagandists, after the missile attacks on our country, on our energy sector.

    “I know that darkness will not prevent us from leading the occupiers to their new defeats.

    “But we must be prepared for any scenario,” he continued.

    Zelensky directed sharp words at the Russian military, which killed at least 16 people and wounded another 64 with artillery attacks in Kherson in the south of the country on Saturday.

    “Brutes,” he said. “We will find every murderer.”

    Russia announced in the autumn that it was annexing Kherson, before Ukrainian forces retook the city as Russian troops retreated to the other side of the Dnipro river.

    From there they have bombarded the city with artillery, according to Ukrainian sources.

    Russian officers were injured after an attack on a Russian command post in the Kherson region, according to the Ukrainian armed forces on Sunday.

    It was unclear how many had died but at least 70 officers were injured after Kiev’s forces attacked during a meeting in the village of Zabaryne, the army said on Sunday.

    Ukrainian fighters have attacked Russian command centres and command posts repeatedly since the start of the invasion, locating them by monitoring radio traffic or the mobile phone network.

    Several senior Russian officers have died in similar attacks.

    Volodymyr Saldo, the governor of the region appointed by Russia, rejected the Ukrainian allegations, insisting that it was Ukrainian forces who were bombarding the city and accusing them of terrorism.

    “This is repulsive provocation with the apparent aim of attributing blame to the Russian forces,” he said.

    He insisted that the nature of the destruction indicated artillery fire from Ukrainian-held territory to the north and north-west of the city.

    The Kremlin insists that the entire Kherson region is Russian territory and will not be surrendered.

    Meanwhile as Moscow’s forces seek to overpower the southern region, they are also battling for control of eastern Ukraine, with heavy clashes over the town of Bakhmut.

    However, Kiev’s fighters inflicted “heavy losses” on the invaders there, according to a Ukrainian military spokesperson.

    At least 50 Russian soldiers have been killed and another 80 wounded since Saturday alone, according to Serhii Chervatko, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Army Group East.

    The figures could not be independently verified.

    Bakhmut is seen as a critical point along the front in eastern Ukraine, as any breakthrough here would allow Russian troops to advance deep behind Ukrainian lines. Ukrainian fighters have transformed the town into a fortress in their attempts to defend it.

    The head of administration of the Luhansk region, Serhii Haidai, said that alongside regular Russian troops, Wagner mercenaries and Chechen fighters sent by the republic’s leader Ramzan Kadyrov had failed in their attacks on Bakhmut.

    “They want to show the bunker grandpa (Russian President Vladimir Putin) what they can do,” he said on Telegram, adding: “But so far they are only losing thousands of soldiers who will remain there forever.”

    In spite of Putin’s repeated hints at his willingness to talk in the Ukraine war, Kiev thinks nothing of the Russian president’s words.

    “Russia does not want negotiations and is trying to evade responsibility (for the War).

    “This is obvious, so we are moving towards a tribunal,” Mykhailo Podolyak, adviser to Zelensky, tweeted on Sunday.

    Kiev thinks that Russia’s political and military leadership should stand trial for the war before an international tribunal modelled on the Nuremberg trials of the Nazis in World War II.

    “Russia alone attacked Ukraine and is killing its citizens,” Podolyak further wrote. There are no other “sides, motives or geopolitics,” he added.