Tag: Volodymyr Zelenskyy

  • BREAKING: Trump phones Zelenskyy after “no deal” meeting with Putin

    BREAKING: Trump phones Zelenskyy after “no deal” meeting with Putin

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has confirmed speaking with U.S. President Donald Trump after a meeting that ended with “no deal” with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports President Trump held the meeting with President Putin on Friday at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, Alaska’s biggest city.

    Trump described the summit as an “extremely productive meeting” and that “many points were agreed to”.

    He also said there is a “very good chance of getting there” – referring to a ceasefire – but conceded that there remain sticking points with Moscow, including at least one “significant” one.

    He cautioned that it’s “ultimately up to them” – referring to Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. “There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” he said.

    Reacting, Zelenskyy confirmed that he plans to meet Trump in Washington on Monday after Trump’s summit with Putin.

    “Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace,” Zelenskyy said on X on Saturday.

    He wrote: “We had a long and substantive conversation with  @POTUS. We started with one-on-one talks before inviting European leaders to join us.

    “This call lasted for more than an hour and a half, including about an hour of our bilateral conversation with President Trump.

    “Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace. President Trump informed about his meeting with the Russian leader and the main points of their discussion.

    “It is important that America’s strength has an impact on the development of the situation.

    “We support President Trump’s proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the USA, and Russia. Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this.

    “On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war. I am grateful for the invitation.

    “It is important that Europeans are involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America. We also discussed positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine’s security.

    “We continue to coordinate our positions with all partners. I thank everyone who is helping.

    Meanwhile, White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, confirmed to reporters that Trump indeed had a “lengthy” call with Zelenskyy on the plane back to DC.

    Leavitt also disclosed that Trump has briefed Nato leaders on the outcome of his talk with his Russian counterpart, and earlier said it was now up to Zelenskyy to ‘get it done’.

  • Moscow confirms interest in negotiations with Kiev

    Moscow confirms interest in negotiations with Kiev

    The Kremlin has confirmed its interest in a third round of negotiations proposed by Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, between Mosco and Kiev to end the war.

    At the previous meeting, both sides exchanged their position papers, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday.

    Peskov said that an exchange of views and negotiations are now pending, but completely opposing so far.

    He added that great diplomatic work was still needed.

    On Saturday, Zelensky had proposed a meeting to take place later this week, with no finalised date yet.

    Peskov said that there were no changes on the Russian side regarding the composition of the delegation.

    In the previous two rounds of talks in Istanbul, Russia’s chief negotiator was the presidential adviser and former Culture Minister to Vladimir Medinsky.

    In May, Kiev and Moscow held bilateral negotiations for the first time in three years.

    At this meeting and a later one in June in Istanbul, both sides agreed on a large prisoner exchange and the return of fallen soldiers.

    However, steps towards ending the war against Ukraine, ordered by Russian President,Vladimir Putin in February 2022, were not discussed, says a Russian agency.

  • Russia vs Ukraine: Putin skips peace talks with waiting Zelenskyy in Turkey

    Russia vs Ukraine: Putin skips peace talks with waiting Zelenskyy in Turkey

    Russian President Vladimir Putin did not appear in Turkey on Thursday for proposed direct peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    Zelenskyy, who was waiting in Ankara after publicly challenging the Kremlin leader to face-to-face negotiations to end their three-year-old war, was left without a counterpart.

    In Putin’s absence, a Russian delegation arrived in Istanbul, but it remained unclear whether any meetings would take place, potentially the first since March 2022, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine a month earlier.

    Zelenskyy dismissed the Russian delegation as merely “decorative,” casting doubt on Moscow’s commitment to genuine negotiations.

    Speaking at the airport in Ankara, Zelenskyy said the next steps in the peace process would be decided after his upcoming meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who welcomed him with an honour guard at the presidential palace.

    Putin’s no-show dealt a blow to renewed hopes for peace, which had recently gained momentum with support from the Trump administration and Western European leaders.

    It also raised the likelihood of new international sanctions on Russia, which Western nations had warned could follow if progress stalled.

  • Russia vs Ukraine war: Zelenskyy not ready for peace – Trump [VIDEO]

    Russia vs Ukraine war: Zelenskyy not ready for peace – Trump [VIDEO]

    U.S. President Donald Trump, after a fiery meeting on Friday, has said Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy does not want peace.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy met in the White House, Washington, but the meeting quickly spiralled into an antagonistic exchange.

    The meeting was about the future of a potential U.S.-Ukraine deal over natural resources.

    “We had a very meaningful meeting in the White House today. Much was learned that could never be understood without conversation under such fire and pressure.

    “It’s amazing what comes out through emotion, and I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations.

    “I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace,” Trump wrote after the meeting.

    Following the meeting, Zelenskyy took to X (formerly Twitter) to say: “Thank you America, thank you for your support, thank you for this visit. Thank you @POTUS, Congress, and the American people. Ukraine needs just and lasting peace, and we are working exactly for that”.

    Watch full video of the fiery meeting below:

  • As Peace Eludes the Weak in a World of the Strong, Welcome to 2023 – By Dennis Onakinor

    As Peace Eludes the Weak in a World of the Strong, Welcome to 2023 – By Dennis Onakinor

    By midnight of December 31st, 2022, joyous sound of fireworks will reverberate through the skies of most towns and cities across the world in celebration of the dawn of 2023. But for the people of Ukraine, it will be the now-familiar sound of fire from machine guns, tanks, artillery, missiles, jet fighters, and bombers, which signify nothing but death, destruction, and misery. For, since Vladimir Putin’s war machine rumbled into their country on February 24, 2022, Ukrainians have known no peace.

    While most people are still aghast at the occurrence of this conflagration in a 21st Century European society, Russia continues to intensify its indiscriminate bombardment of Ukrainian towns and cities. And, from the plethora of related analysis, an incontrovertible fact emerges: that Ukraine would not have been exposed to Russian military aggression if the country had not given up the nuclear weapons it inherited from the defunct Soviet Union, in accordance with the terms of the “1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances.”

    “Might is right,” wrote the German-born American Anarchist, Ragnar Redbeard, in his 1896 publication of same title, aka “Survival of the Fittest.” Drawing from Social Darwinism, and deploying virulent incendiary language, Redbeard denounced all Judeo-Christian principles of rights and wrongs, and condemned modern societal principles of justice, equity, morality, etc. Hear him:

    “Blessed are the strong, for they shall possess the earth; cursed are the weak, for they shall inherit the yoke … Blessed are the bold, for they shall be masters of the world; cursed are the humble, for they shall be trodden under hoofs … Human rights and wrongs are not determined by justice, but by might … Each molecule, each animal, fights for its life … the survival of the strongest is the iron law of history.”

    President Putin may not have read Redbeard’s “Might is Right,” but as an irredentist, who glorifies Russia’s military might at every opportunity, he certainly understands that in international relations power plays a dominant role. For, whenever he discusses his Ukrainian war casus belli, he never fails to accuse the US of unbridled exhibition of military power across the globe. Whereas, if the truth were to be told, Russia stands condemned for same exhibition of military power by its unprovoked aggression against its neighbour.

    In course of announcing the annexation of occupied Ukrainian regions of Donesk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye on September 30, 2022, Putin accused the US of being “the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan.” He went further to state that in course of the 2nd World War, the US and Britain reduced most German cities to rubble because, just like the nuclear bombing of the two Japanese cities, they wanted to “intimidate our country and the rest of the world.”

    Viewed from the perspective of Cold War political currents, Putin might be right that the US had always sought to resolve international conflicts through unilateral military action, as it did in Grenada in 1983, Libya in 1986, and Panama in 1989. But even so, post-2nd World War history is replete with instances of display of military might by the super powers, with the US setting the tone in its 1960 – 1975 military intervention in Vietnam. The Soviet Union followed suit in its 1979 – 1989 occupation of Afghanistan, while the US once again showcased itself in Iraq between 2003 – 2011. Suffice to say that both powers were dealt humiliating blows in course of their military adventurism.

    Be that as it may, Russia’s ongoing brutal and barbaric military campaign in Ukraine belies President Putin’s accusation against the US’ conduct during the 2nd World War. As witnessed by the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), Russian forces have shown utter disregard for the sanctity of human lives in course of their punitive military campaign, as they leave a trail of mass graves, smouldering ruins, and human misery in their wake.
    Truly, occurrences in the ongoing war had been predicted by analysts, including Yours Sincerely (see The News Guru article titled “Ukraine Crisis: War is Not Inevitable if Preventive Diplomacy is on the Cards”). For instance, it was noted that Ukraine’s inferior armed forces would be unable to repel Russia’s invading forces without the direct intervention of their NATO partners; and that restriction of hostilities to Ukraine’s territory would only serve to heighten Russia’s unwillingness to end its aggression, since its civilian population will not be directly impacted by the war.

    Indeed, Ukrainian forces are presently unable to respond to Russia’s missile barrage because the US and its NATO allies have refused to provide them with long-range weapons – a situation occasioned by Putin’s threat to resort to nuclear weapons in the event of Ukraine being provided with military capabilities that could pose “existential threat” to the Russian “motherland.” It’s a scenario akin to a boxing fight in which one of the boxers has one of his hands firmly tied behind his back. For how long will the rest of the world allow this pitiable situation to prevail in the Ukrainian war?

    In light of the foregoing, the self-ruled Pacific Island of Taiwan must tread cautiously as it confronts a revanchist China in asserting its independence status, which is not officially recognized by most countries of the world, including the US that has “committed” to protecting her against Chinese military aggression. But, while the US may readily arm Taiwan against Chinese aggressive designs, the Ukrainian war has shown that mere possession of arms is not enough for a militarily-inferior entity to tip the scales of war against a global military power.

    “Will the US defend Taiwan against Chinese military invasion?” Asked by a reporter at a joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida on May 22, 2022, President Joe Biden responded: “That’s the commitment we made … we agree with ‘One China’ policy. We signed onto it and all the attendant agreements made from there. But the idea it (Taiwan) could be taken by force, it’s just not appropriate. It’ll dislocate the entire region and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine. And so, it’s a burden that is even stronger.”
    But even so, the Taiwanese authorities must seek concrete guarantees from the US and other allies, that any armed conflict with China would not be restricted to Taiwanese territory, but will be extended to the Chinese mainland through every available means. In essence, it will not be a one-sided affair involving the destruction of Taiwanese towns and cities by Chinese forces. Otherwise, such a military confrontation is totally unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.

    But even at that, all parties to the simmering Sino-Taiwanese conflict should work relentlessly towards resolving it diplomatically, rather than seek a military solution. Particularly, Taiwanese leaders must realize that pacifist diplomacy is not synonymous with unpatriotism and cowardice, and that war serves no useful purpose other than the benefits that accrue to the global military-industrial complex, represented by vicious arms dealers, unscrupulous mercenaries, profiteers, and sundry base elements.

    Unfortunately, most states have imbibed the erroneous notion that exhibition of military might deters external aggression. With North Korea seemingly getting away with its provocative nuclear sabre-rattling and missile tests, countries like Iran have certainly concluded that acquisition of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems is the only effective deterrence against adversarial threats. And, going by occurrences in Ukraine, where Russian military might is proving right, Iran and its ilk might just be right.

  • “US support package would not help Ukraine”- Russia brags

    “US support package would not help Ukraine”- Russia brags

    Russia has accused the United States of fighting a proxy war in Ukraine, saying “the latest US support package- which comes on top of some $50bn already sent to Ukraine this year as Europe’s biggest land conflict since World War II drags on- would not help end the more than 300-day-long conflict.”

    “This is not conducive to a speedy settlement, quite the contrary. And this cannot prevent the Russian Federation from achieving its goals during the special military operation,” Kremlin (Russia) spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters on Thursday.

    Recall that Washington hosted Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, on a historic visit and boosted military support for his country.

    Zelenskyy enjoyed a hero’s welcome on his lightning trip to Washington on Wednesday, with his US counterpart Joe Biden committing to providing Kyiv with $1.8bn-worth of military equipment, including the highly sought after Patriot missile defence system.

    Peskov added that there had been no calls for peace or signs of willingness to “listen to Russia’s concerns” during Zelenskyy’s visit, proving that the US was intent on fighting a proxy war with Russia “to the last Ukrainian”.

    His remarks came as Russian news agencies reported that defence minister Sergei Shoigu had visited army units fighting in Ukraine. The reports did not specify where the visit took place.

    Advanced air defence system
    Zelenskyy’s visit marked his first overseas trip since Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24.

    Before addressing a joint meeting of Congress, the Ukrainian leader held a meeting with Biden at the White House, during which the US president pledged to deliver the Patriot system to Kyiv.

    Ukraine had previously appealed for the equipment, arguing that it would help bolster its air defences amid continued Russian missile attacks on critical infrastructure and cities across the country which have left millions of people without electricity or running water during a freezing winter.

    The Patriot is one of the most advanced US air defence systems, capable of intercepting threats, such as aircraft and ballistic missiles.

    It was gathered that Ukrainian troops will learn how to use it in Germany, and it will be several months before they can deploy it on the battlefield.

    Russia has said that once deployed, the Patriot system will be a legitimate target for Russian bombardment.

  • War: Ukrainian gov’t to merge several ministries, downsize workforce

    War: Ukrainian gov’t to merge several ministries, downsize workforce

    The Ukrainian government is planning to scale down the number of ministries from 20 to 14 and reduce the number of civil servants, Ukrainian newspaper Dzerkalo Tyzhnia (Mirror Weekly) reported on Wednesday.

    The decision was made on Tuesday at a meeting between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the cabinet, where they discussed concepts for the government’s transformation, the newspaper said.

    The economy ministry will presumably be merged with the ministries for strategic industries and for agriculture to form a new ministry for economic development.

    The ministry for digital transformation will swallow the national agency of public service and part of the ministry for strategic industries, the report said.

    The changes will not affect the Ukrainian ministries of the interior, foreign affairs, justice, defense, finance, healthcare, and education, the newspaper reported.

    The report added that the staff of state employees in the ministries’ central offices is planned to be downsized from 9,200 to 2,800, and in regional offices from 17,000 to about 7,000.

  • Zelenskyy urges Russia’s expulsion from the United Nations

    Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, has accused Russia of becoming “a terrorist” state carrying out “daily terrorist acts” and urged Russia’s expulsion from the United Nations.

     

    In a virtual address to the U.N. Security Council, Zelenskyy urged the U.N. to establish an international tribunal to investigate “the actions of Russian occupiers on Ukrainian soil” and to hold the country accountable.

     

    “We need to act urgently to do everything to make Russia stop the killing spree,” Zelenskyy said, warning that otherwise Russia’s “terrorist activity” will spread to other European countries and Asia, singling out the Baltic states, Poland, Moldova and Kazakhstan.

     

    “What is punished at the level of specific criminals and criminal organizations must not go unpunished at the level of a state that has become a terrorist,” he said. “Daily terrorist acts. No days off. They work as terrorists every day.”

    Zelenskyy
    Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy

     

    In urging Russia’s ouster from the 193-member United Nations, Zelenskyy cited Article 6 of the U.N. Charter which states that a member “which has persistently violated the principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

     

    Russia’s expulsion, however, is virtually impossible. That’s because as a permanent council member Russia would be able to use its veto to block any attempt to oust it.

     

    Ukraine called the council meeting after Russia’s recent upsurge in attacks including Monday’s fiery airstrike on a crowded shopping mall in the central city of Kremenchuk that Zelenskyy said killed at least 18 people and wounded 30 others. “Dozens are missing” and body fragments have been found including hands and feet, he said, adding that unfortunately there may be more victims.

     

    The Ukrainian leader began his speech listing Russia’s attacks in recent days and giving the first names and ages of many of the victims. He ended his address asking the 15 Security Council members and others in the chamber to stand in silent tribute to commemorate the “tens of thousands” of Ukrainian children and adults killed in the war.

     

    All members rose including Russia’s deputy U.N. ambassador Dmitry Polyansky.

     

    When he took the floor later, Polyansky protested against giving Zelenskyy a second opportunity to address the Security Council, a decision by Albanian which holds the council presidency this month.

     

    The Russian envoy said the Ukrainian president’s video address violated the council’s traditions and existing practices which state that leaders who wish to speak to the council must be present in the chamber.

     

    “The U.N. Security Council should not be turned into a platform for a remote PR campaign from president Zelenskyy in order to get more weapons from participants at the NATO summit” starting Wednesday in Madrid, Polyansky said.

     

    He claimed that there was no Russian strike on the shopping center in Kremenchuk, saying Russian precision weapons struck hangars in the Kremenchuk road machinery plant with weapons and ammunition from the United States and Europe destined for Ukrainian troops in eastern Donbass.

    Zelenskyy

     

    The shopping center was some distance away but the detonation of ammunition “created a fire which then spread to the shopping center,” Polyansky said.

     

    The Russian envoy told Western nations that by supplying weapons to Ukraine they were prolonging the time when Ukraine’s leaders “will sit down at the negotiating table with a realistic position rather than with slogans.”

     

    “We began a special military operation in order to stop the shelling of Donbass by Ukraine and so that the territory of this country, which has been turned into anti-Russia at the behest of a number of Western countries, as well as its nationalist leadership, ceases to pose a threat to Russia or the inhabitants of the south and southeast of Ukraine,” he said. “And until those goals are achieved, our operation will continue.”

    Zelenskyy
    Russian president, Vladimir Putin

     

    Britain’s U.N. Ambassador Barbara Woodward retorted that Russia “can try to claim that nothing is true and make outrageous claims of Ukrainian provocations” but the undeniable fact is that Russia invaded Ukraine.

     

    “There is one aggressor here,” she said. “The evidence will catch up with them and there will be accountability for these crimes.”

     

    Ambassador Zhang Jun of China, a close ally of Russia, called the conflict “a geopolitical crisis” with multi-faceted spillover effects and urged the international community to work together to create conditions for Russian-Ukrainian peace talks to end hostilities at an early date.

     

    “Attempts to weaponize the world economy and to coerce other countries into taking sides will artificially divide the international community, and make the world even less secure,” Zhang warned. “Delaying and obstructing diplomatic negotiations for geopolitical purposes will only add fuel to the fire to intensify confrontation and magnify conflicts. Inevitably, it will end up hurting themselves.”

     

    U.S. deputy ambassador Richard Mills, like many other Western ambassadors, accused Russia of destroying the shopping center, saying the attack “fits into a cruel pattern, one where the Russian military kills civilians and destroys civilian infrastructure in Ukraine.”

     

    He stressed that there is ample publicly available evidence “that Russia, and Russia alone” is responsible for this and other attacks.

     

  • UKRAINE INVASION: Why Ukrainians are ready to die for the European perspective

    Ukrainians have said they are ready to die for the European perspective, as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy maintains that Ukraine has powerful support in Europe for joining the EU0:46.

     

    Ukraine may become a member of the European Union after the EU Commission proposed it as a candidate, the first step on a long road toward membership for the war-torn country.

     

    According to Ukraine’s commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, who announced Ukrainians stand on joining the EU0:46, the decision was on the understanding that Ukraine carried out a number of reforms, Von der Leyen added.

     

    In her words: “We want them to live with us, the European dream. Ukraine has clearly demonstrated the country’s aspiration and the country’s determination to live up to European values and standards,” she said.

     

    President Zelenskyy hailed the news from Brussels as a “big step forward”.

    Ukraine

     

    Ukraine applied for membership in the bloc less than a week after Russia first invaded the country.

     

    On Thursday, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, and Romania all visited Ukraine and vowed to back Kyiv in becoming an official candidate.

     

    President Zelenskyy said Ukraine had “powerful” support from these countries.

     

    “It was important for me to hear another fundamental thing from the leaders – they agree that the end of the war in Ukraine and peace must be determined exactly as Ukraine sees them,” President Zelenskyy said.

     

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) gathered that the move is unlikely to sit well with Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who does not want Ukraine to have a strong relationship with the West.

     

    The recommendation will now be discussed by leaders of the 27 EU member states at a summit next week in Brussels.

     

    However, that does not mean that Ukraine is about to join the ranks of EU member states, because the subsequent path to membership can be a long one.

     

    Ukraine

     

    Candidate status for Georgia

    Candidate status was also recommended for Moldova, while things remain a little trickier for Georgia, which also applied for membership.

     

    Ms Von der Leyen said although Georgia had a strong application, it had yet to come together politically.

     

    Turkey was actually declared an official candidate at the end of the last century, but has no chance of joining the bloc in the foreseeable future.

  • PUBLIC DISPLAY: U.S President announces supply of drones to Ukraine

    PUBLIC DISPLAY: U.S President announces supply of drones to Ukraine

    Despite an emotional address to congress by Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, where he pleaded for a no-fly zone, U.S President, Joe Biden, has announced that the U.S. is increasing its supply of missiles, firearms, and now drones to Ukraine in a public display.

    The White House has now detailed exactly what weaponry the U.S. is providing, when just weeks ago U.S. officials refused to say.

    The message is meant to not only reassure Ukraine of strong U.S. support but also send a message to Moscow that it will pay a bloody price for its invasion of its neighbor.

    “The American people are answering President Zelenskyy’s call for more help, more weapons for Ukraine to defend itself, more tools to fight Russian aggression, and that’s what we’re doing,” Biden said in an address Wednesday.

    That increase comes after intense pressure from Kyiv, as well as Washington, where lawmakers of both parties have urged Biden to escalate U.S. military support.

    U.S President has repeatedly cautioned against crossing certain lines, saying they would lead to “World War III.”

    Among them, the administration has ruled out implementing a no-fly zone, sending U.S. troops into Ukrainian territory, or having the U.S. directly provide Soviet-era warplanes from NATO allies like Poland.

    Instead, Biden said that an initial tranche of $800 million, from the nearly $14 billion Congress approved in humanitarian and military aid for Ukraine, would include 800 Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, 100 Switchblade drones, and 9,000 anti-armor missiles, including 2,000 Javelin anti-tank missiles.

    The Switchblade drone is the newest form of lethal assistance — a small kamikaze-style drone launched from a tube that can track and attack armored targets.

    Ukrainian armed forces have made powerful use of drones in their fight against invading Russian forces already, although some military analysts say the Switchblade is not powerful enough and the U.S. isn’t sending enough of them.

    “The Switchblade is a capable system, but has its drawbacks compared to some more modern versions of ‘loitering munitions’ that you can return to base and re-use,” said retired Gen. Robert Abrams, former chief of U.S. Forces Korea.

    To date, Ukraine has received thousands of Javelin missiles from the U.S. and other NATO allies, including approximately 2,600 from the U.S., the White House announced Wednesday.

    Javelins were once seen as too escalatory by the Obama administration to provide Ukraine after Russia first invaded its smaller, democratic neighbor in 2014, seizing the Crimean Peninsula and sparking a separatist war in the eastern provinces Donetsk and Luhansk.

    Now, the White House is confirming not just the delivery of thousands of them, but of hundreds of Stinger missiles.

    Still, there are many who say more must be done, from U.S. lawmakers to Ukrainian officials to leaders of NATO countries in the alliance’s eastern flank.

    After meeting Zelenskyy in Kyiv, for example, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the powerful leader of Poland’s ruling party who serves as deputy prime minister, told reporters an international peacekeeping mission should be sent to Ukraine, with the means to defend itself.

    U.S. officials have ruled that out, starting with Biden and stretching to include Republican lawmakers.

    “[A] NATO no-fly zone seems to be a bridge too far for me and the administration,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

    But he added that “there is bipartisan support for sending a package that includes fighter jets and air defense systems to Ukraine immediately so that we can have a Ukrainian no-fly zone manned by Ukrainian pilots and manned by missile systems in the hands of the Ukrainian military.”

    The administration is consulting with U.S. allies that have more advanced missile systems than the shoulder-fired Stingers and Javelins that have been provided so far, according to State Department and Pentagon officials.

     

    In particular, there are talks to resupply Soviet-era or Russian-made missile systems, they said — such as the S-300 missile battery.

    “Those are the systems on which they’re already using, the systems on which they’re already trained and have actually demonstrated great effect already,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price told reporters Wednesday.
    Only three NATO allies have the S-300 (Greece, Bulgaria, and Slovakia).

    Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan spoke on Wednesday to his Greek counterpart, Dr. Thanos Dokos, including about “international efforts, to ensure Ukraine has the ability to defend itself,” the White House said.

    But the Pentagon has rejected an idea from Poland to have Polish Soviet-era warplanes known as MiG-29s transferred to U.S. custody and then passed onto Ukraine, saying a U.S. intelligence assessment warned the move would be seen as too escalatory by the Kremlin.

    “The equipment that we provided is defensive, as you know, not offensive, and we see that as being a difference,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday.

    To some, any lethal U.S. aid may be seen as crossing Putin’s red line after the strongman leader warned the world that countries interfering in his so-called “special military operation” would face “consequences you have never seen.”

    U.S. officials have said they’re still encouraging other countries to provide warplanes directly, but lawmakers continue to press the White House to get involved, especially after Zelenskyy’s address.

    “Never in the history of warfare have 28 planes meant so much to so many,” said Graham Wednesday.

    Ukraine already has a fleet of MiG-29s that the Pentagon has said they are not using often in part because Russia has not dominated the country’s airspace.

    In addition, fewer than half of Poland’s planes may be flyable, according to retired Gen. Joseph Ralston, the former commander of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

    The Soviet-era planes require spare parts from Russia, out of the question in the current conflict, and constant maintenance, although providing their spare parts to the Ukrainians now be helpful, he said.

    “The MiG-29 issue has taken on more of a symbolic issue than it is a real-world issue,” Ralston said during an event at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    While the White House has publicly touted this aid in the midst of pressure to do more, it’s been very tight-lipped about how it is getting into Ukrainian hands. Russia has made clear that the delivery of military aid is a potential “target.”

    Russian Deputy Foreign Minister, Sergei Ryabkov, said “pumping Ukraine with weapons from a number of countries orchestrated by them is not just a dangerous move, but these are actions that turn the corresponding convoys into legitimate targets.”