Tag: Yahaya Bello

  • Support Gov Ododo in everything – Former Gov, Bello tells Kogi lawmakers in viral video

    Support Gov Ododo in everything – Former Gov, Bello tells Kogi lawmakers in viral video

    Yahaya Bello, the immediate past Governor of Kogi State has urged the members of the State House of Assembly to give full support to the administration of his successor, Governor Usman Ododo.

    TheNewsGuru.com(TNG) reports that Bello, who handed over to Ododo in January 2024 after completing his two-term tenure, made the appeal in a 29-second video currently circulating on social media.

    In the footage that surfaced on social media, Bello was seen addressing a group of lawmakers and their supporters, as he nudged them to rally behind Speaker Aliyu Umar Yusuf and other Assembly members in ensuring smooth cooperation with the state government even if they don’t understand.

    “Sit down. So, are you going in there now… Go and cooperate with the Speaker, other members of the House of Assembly of Kogi State, and be part of those that will support Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo in everything that comes to the Assembly,” Bello said in part of the video.

    The lawmakers had all responded with a round of applause at the end of his remarks, signalling approval of the former governor’s call for unity and cooperation.

  • Yahaya Bello’s passport not with us – Abuja court

    Yahaya Bello’s passport not with us – Abuja court

    An FCT High Court says the international passport of the immediate-past Governor of Kogi, Yahaya Bello, was not in its custody but in the custody of the Federal High Court.

    Justice Maryanne Anenih made this known on Thursday at the resumed hearing of the alleged money laundering case instituted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against the former governor,

    She held that the court would have considered the application for the release of the defendant’s travel document if it were to be in its custody.

    The judge said even if the request to retrieve the travel passport were to be granted, it would be of no effect since the passport was not in the custody of the court.

    Bello, Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu were arraigned on Nov 27 , 2024 on a 16-count- charge bordering on alleged property fraud to the tune of N110 billion..

    Anenih also noted that the court could have considered the submissions of the counsels if the international passport had been before the FCT High Court; however, the application was incompetent.

    The judge stated that the application submitted by Bello was misleading in its assumption that his passport was before the FCT High Court.

    She clarified that the bail conditions given to the defendant had required him to submit his international passport or an affidavit if it was before another court.

    Furthermore, the bail conditions directed Bello to release his passport immediately after it was released by the Federal High Court, where he was facing a separate charge.

    The judge also noted that Bello had sworn in his affidavit that the passport was with the deputy registrar of the Federal High Court and would present it as soon as it “is released to me by the Federal High Court.”

    “The international passport cannot be in two places at the same time; this court is not in a position to speculate if he has two passports,” because this fact was not presented before the court.

    After the ruling, Anenih adjourned until
    Oct. 8 for its continuation of trial.

    The former governor is facing a similar charge at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    He had filed an application, requesting for the release of his international passport to enable him to travel out of the country on health grounds.

    Counsel to the defendant, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had earlier submitted that the international passport being requested was not in the custody of the Court.

    A review of the Court’s record revealed that the applicant had previously been ordered to deposit his international passport and other travel documents with the registry of the Court.

    However, upon further enquiry and search conducted by the Court, it was discovered that the said international passport was not presently in the custody of the Court’s registry.

    Bello , in his application, had also indicated that his travel documents were with the Federal High Court.

    The court had, on July 8, adjourned ruling on the defendant’s application to Thursday, July 17.

    Daudu, SAN, told the court that the application was dated 19th June, 2025 and filed on June 20, 2025.

    “It seeks an order for the release of the 1st defendant/applicant’s international passport by the registrar to enable him to travel for medical attention,” he had said.

    The counsel said the application was supported by an affidavit of 13 grounds in the face of the motion and supported by a 22 paragraphs affidavit deposed to by the applicant himself.

    The EFCC Counsel had, however, filed a counter-affidavit, application should not be granted.

  • VIDEO: Yahaya Bello marries for the fourth time

    VIDEO: Yahaya Bello marries for the fourth time

    Yahaya Bello, an ex- Kogi State governor has tied the knot for the fourth time, this time with one Hiqma Yahaya-Bello, in a private ceremony held in Abuja.

    According to reports, the wedding, which was witnessed by only close family and friends,took place on Saturday in the Kubwa area of the Federal Capital Territory.

    Bello’s third wife, Hafiza Yahaya-Bello, confirmed the marriage after taking to Instagram to welcome the new bride.

    “Alhamdulillah, our family just got a little bigger and more loving! A warm welcome to our new family member, Mrs. Hiqma Yahaya Bello! May Allah bless our union and fill our home with love, peace, and Barakah. Amin,” she wrote.

    Watch the video below:

     

    Hiqma joins Bello’s other wives: Amina Oyiza, his first wife; Rasheedat, his second; and Hafiza, his third, who was the most publicly visible during his tenure as governor.

  • Bello disowns APC chairmanship campaign posters

    Bello disowns APC chairmanship campaign posters

    Former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, has distanced himself from APC National Chairmanship campaign posters recently seen across the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

    In a statement on Thursday by its Director, Michael Ohiare, the Yahaya Bello Media Office in Lokoja dismissed the posters as the work of mischief makers.

    Ohiare expressed surprise at reports suggesting the APC chairmanship campaign posters of the immediate past Kogi governor had flooded parts of Abuja.

    “They (the mischief makers) are at it again, having failed on many fronts in their desperate ‘bring-him-down-at-all-costs’ mission,” he noted.

    He said the reports would ordinarily be ignored, as close associates know Bello’s loyalty to the party is unwavering.

    “As a committed party man, his support for President Bola Tinubu’s leadership has never been in doubt,” Ohiare added.

    He stressed that nothing of the sort could come from Bello, particularly when party procedures remain firmly in place.

    “Since this is not the first time mischief makers have printed posters in his name, silence is no longer an option,”  Ohiare declared.

    He stated that no one was authorised, directly or indirectly, to print or paste any poster on Bello’s behalf.

    He urged the public to disregard such acts by individuals bent on embarrassing the former governor.

  • Drama as prosecution tags EFCC’s case against Yahaya Bello as “political case”

    Drama as prosecution tags EFCC’s case against Yahaya Bello as “political case”

    There was a mild drama at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday, as Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), described the charge preferred against former Gov. Yahaya Bello as “a political case.”

    Pinheiro stated this while arguments were being raised before Justice Emeka Nwite on whether the defence lawyer, Joseph Daudu, SAN, could cross-examine the 4th prosecution witness (PW-4) shortly after the conclusion of evidence-in-chief or wait till Friday.

    While describing the importance of the case and the need to expedite proceedings, the anti-graft lawyer said it was the trial of a former governor of a state, hence, political.

    However, Daudu responded that the matter was not political one but a trial on allegations bordering on money laundering.

    Pinheiro insisted it was political, emphasising that he was not prosecuting a bank official, but a political figure, “one who had even aspired to contest for presidency.”

    “Political? If that is the case, then those handling political cases should prepare to take over the matter,” Justice Nwite said jokingly.

    Earlier, the judge, in a ruling, rejected the application by the EFCC to “‘cross-examine” its own witness in the ongoing money laundering trial of ex-Gov. Bello.

    Justice Nwite stated that there was no provision in law that permits the court to allow the prosecution to re-examine its witness in the manner proposed.

    It would be recalled that the lawyer who appeared for the EFCC in the last adjourned date, Olukayode Enitan, SAN, had sought to “cross-examine” their 3rd prosecution witness (PW-3), Mr Nicholas Ojehomon, an Internal Auditor with American International School, Abuja (AISA).

    The request was made after Daudu concluded his cross examination of Ojehomon.

    Daudu had asked specific questions regarding the judgment of the FCT High Court which was admitted in evidence as Exhibit 19 by the judge during the cross-examination.

    Shortly after the cross-examination, Justice Nwite had asked Enitan if he would re-examine the witness.

    Enitan, however, informed the court that he planned to also cross-examine Ojehomon based on the Exhibit 19.

    He told the court that he was not re-examining the PW-3, but cross-examining him on the document admitted in evidence during cross examination by the defence but the defence counsel opposed the request and the matter was adjourned for ruling.

    Delivering the ruling, Justice Nwite agreed with Daudu’s argument that the prosecution can only be allowed to cross-examine its witness after it must have declared it’s own witness as “hostile witness.”

    “The argument of the learned counsel to the prosecution is misconceived,” he said.

    According to the judge, this honourable court is not shutting the prosecution from re-examining the witness, but must restrict itself to Pages 1, 14 and 15 of Exhibit 19.

    “The prosecution is not allowed to re-examine the witness outside the pages prescribed,” he said.

    Ojehomon had,, on May 9, said there was no wired transfer of fees from the Kogi State Government or any of the local governments’ account in the state to the account of the American school.

    On cross-examination, he also read out part of a previous FCT High Court’s judgment that said there was no court order for AISA to return fees to EFCC or any judgment declaring the money as proceeds of money laundering.

    After the ruling, Pinheiro called the 4th prosecution witness (PW-4), Mshelia Arhyel Bata, a compliance officer with Zenith Bank.

    The witness, while being led in evidence by Pinheiro, confirmed that certificates of identification were attached to the statements of account provided by the bank in the seven set of documents presented, as requested.

    The court, thereafter, admitted the statements of account of Kogi State Government House Administration, and six others, as exhibits.

    The witness, who was on subpoena, explained to the court on the withdrawal limits allowed for individuals, corporate organisations and government.

    He said that before the cashless policy, it was pegged at N10 million for government.

    The prosecution then took him to the May 23, 2016 on the printed documents, and pointed at a transaction under the name, Abdulsalami Hudu.

    When the witness was asked to explain the transaction, he said, “It is a cash withdrawal of N10 million in accordance with the then maximum threshold allowed for cheque withdrawal per transaction.”

    He, however, said he had nine cash transactions on the same date.

    The witness was then told to go to the credit transactions of January 30, 2018, and he confirmed that there were 10 separate credits of various sums, totalling about N1.092 billion.

    When asked to mention the total amount of withdrawals, the defendant’s counsel cut in, saying, “He (Pinheiro, SAN), knows that they are for security votes.”

    The witness aggregated the total amount of withdrawals to N1.968 billion, saying they were on different dates.

    He also read out the inflow and outflow between May 2, 2018 and May 19, 2018.

    After the examination by the prosecution, the judge adjourned the matter until June 27 for cross-examination.

  • Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello opens up on 2027 presidential ambition

    Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello opens up on 2027 presidential ambition

    Former governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello on Friday said he won’t contest against President Bola Tinubu in 2027 because he has no presidential ambition.

    In a statement signed by Michael Ohiare, his Media Director, Bello expressed surprise and shock over a video post of his 2022 rally,  claiming he had started campaigning against President Tinubu for 2027.

    The statement read: “While we state categorically, that our principal, Bello, has no 2027 presidential ambition, we want to also stress his unflinching commitment to the re-election of President Tinubu come 2027.

    “The indices cannot lie. The President and his team have done exceedingly well for the country, despite global challenges. On merit, he deserves the support of well meaning Nigerians.

    “Nigerians should disregard the mischievous post insinuating a fresh presidential support rally as what it is – a senseless post by a confused, witless mind

    “The fabricators forgot that the 2022 dates are boldly written on the banners on display. Yet, they expect reasonable people not to see this as the handiwork of detractors. ” he said.

    Ohiare described the post as a “senseless post” by mischief makers, who have no other job than to fabricate falsehood and disseminate same to mislead unsuspecting Nigerians.

    According to him, the fabricators have tried so hard in their “bring-him-down-at-all-costs” mission against Bello but have always failed woefully.

    The director stated that it was not the first time detractors and their co-travellers would fly absolute falsehood with the aim of setting the former governor against President Tinubu.

    “But this latest slant of reposting a 2022 rally afresh and insinuating that it is just happening, connotes nothing but sheer mischief.

    “Nigerians should be wary of witless persons who concoct stories without thinking, just to satisfy the interests of their paymasters, ” he said

    He stressed that the post was out of desperate bid to create crisis where there is none.

  • Alleged defamation: Yahaya Bello demands prosecution of Senator Natasha

    Alleged defamation: Yahaya Bello demands prosecution of Senator Natasha

    Former Governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) over alleged defamatory statements against him by suspended Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, (PDP-Kogi Central).

    In the petition, written and signed by his solicitor, Mr N.A. Abubakar to the IG on Wednesday, Bello called on the Nigeria Police Force to invite Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan to substantiate her allegation against him with credible evidence.

    “Where she fails to do so, cause her to be arrested and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of the law for criminal defamation, inciting public disturbance and spreading false information injurious to public peace,” the lawyer wrote.

    He said that the utterances made against the former governor were not only false, reckless and inciting, but “they constitute serious criminal defamation, false accusation and incitement to public disorder, all of which are offences under the Nigerian law.”

    The former governor has also written to Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan, through his Counsel, Chief R.O. Balogun, SAN & Co, demanding retraction and public apology over defamatory statements made against him in two national dailies, or face legal consequences.

    “Our Client’s attention has been drawn to a most disturbing, damaging and criminally defamatory statement made by Sen.  Akpoti-Uduaghan during her public address at a political event tagged ‘Homecoming Rally’ held on April 1, in Okehi LGA of Kogi .

    “That while addressing attendees at the rally, Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan falsely and maliciously said that Senate President Godswill Akpabio sent for Yahaya Bello. And it was actually Sen. Asuquo from Cross River that drove Yahaya Bello from Hilton Hotel.

    “She said that she was informed of everything and what she got to know of the meeting were plans for her recall and that monies exchanged hands.

    “The second thing she alleged was that  Akpabio told Yahaya Bello to make sure that she is killed …’

    “That these utterances are not only false, reckless and inciting, but they constitute serious criminal defamation, false accusation and incitement to public disorder, all of which are offences under Nigerian law,” Bello’s lawyer, Abubakar, wrote in the petition to the IG.

    He said Section 24(1)(b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act, 2015, penalises a person who knowingly or intentionally sends false messages or information through a computer or network likely to cause harm to the reputation of another person.

    He said that Sen.  Akpoti-Uduaghan caused videos of her statement to be widely circulated online where it has continued to trend till date with the clear intention of causing harm to the reputation of the former governor.

    This, the lawyer said, is against the provisions of Sections 114 and 140 of the Penal Code (applicable in Northern Nigeria) – which criminalises giving false information with intent to mislead public officers or the public.

    “By accusing our client of plotting an assassination and naming him as a co-conspirator in a purported murder plot (with an attempt to disguise the killing as mob or ethnic violence), Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan has: damaged our client’s reputation.

    “She has brought his name into disrepute on the basis of an allegation so weighty that, if left unchallenged, could harm his political career and personal safety,” the lawyer said.

    He urged the IGP to expedite action on the petition.

    According to him, this is necessary “to preserve public order, safeguard the integrity of public discourse and protect innocent persons from targeted smear campaigns that can endanger lives or destabilise the peace of the state and nation.”

    Bello’s lawyers,  in a separate letter written to the embattled senator said, “we hereby demand, on behalf of our client, that you issue a formal retraction of the said defamatory statements, to be published in two national dailies.

    “You should cease and desist from making any further defamatory statements concerning him, whether directly or by innuendo, and whether published in print, electronic or social media platforms.

    “That you comply in terms of the foregoing within Fourteen days of the service of this letter on you.

    “TAKE NOTICE that failure, refusal or neglect to comply with the above demands 14 days, from the date this Letter is served on you, our client will set the necessary machinery in motion to initiate both civil and criminal proceedings against you without further notice.”

  • Alleged money laundering: Yahaya Bello’s name not on property documents – EFCC witness

    Alleged money laundering: Yahaya Bello’s name not on property documents – EFCC witness

    A prosecution witness, Segun Adeleke, on Monday, told the Federal High Court in Abuja that the name of the former Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello, was not on the documents of the two property purchased from the company.

    Adeleke, who is also the General Manager of EFAB Properties Ltd, told Justice Emeka Nwite while being cross examined by former governor’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu, SAN.

    The witness, who was the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)’s 1st prosecution witness (PW-1) told the court that Bello did not appear throughout the period of the transactions.

    Earlier, EFCC counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, told the court that the matter was scheduled for trial and their witnesses were in court.

    While being led in evidence, Adeleke was asked to tell the court what he knew about a property located at  No 1, Ikogosi Road, Maitama and another one in Gwarinpa.

    Giving an account of what transpired, he said sometime in 2020, his Chairman, Chief Fabian Nwora, introduced him to a young man called, Shehu Bello, and that they had a discussion concerning the purchase of the property.

    “We had a discussion concerning the purchase of the property in question. And he told me that the young man would be coming back to make payment for the property at an agreed price of N550 million,” he said.

    When asked if he had seen Shehu Bello since that day, he said, “I saw him three times.

    “The first time was during introduction, the second time for payment and the third time was when he brought a legal document for the execution of the EFAB property.”

    The EFCC lawyer then mentioned another property at 5th Avenue in Gwarinpa and told the witness to tell the court what he knew about it.

    Responding, the PW-1 said the property was purchased by one Nuhu Mohammed for N70 million and was paid for through a bank transfer.

    He was asked if he remembered which bank the money came from, but he responded in the negative.

    On cross-examination, the defendant’s counsel, Daudu, asked if the witness’ actions were purely based on the instructions of his chairman and he responded in affirmative.

    Daudu further asked whether it was correct to say that he did not initiate any discussion with Shehu Bello on his own, to which he also answered, “Yes.”

    When asked if Shehu Bello signed the documents for the transaction in his presence, the witness said: “He did not my lord.”

    Daudu then asked him, “throughout this transaction, did you set eye on the defendant (ex-governor)?”

    “Not at anytime in the course of this transaction,” the witness responded.

    “Does hs name appear anywhere on the documents you said are with EFCC to the best of your recollection?” tye senior lawyer further asked.

    “No, my lord,” Adeleke responded.

    When Daudu also asked the witness if he saw Shehu Bello in court since morning before the proceeding began, he said: “My lord, in this court room, I did not see him.”

    However, when Pinheiro said they had another witness who was subpoenaed to testify in court, Daudu objected that they were being taken by surprise, arguing that the statements of the subpoenaed witness had not been made available to them.

    The defence lawyer, however, told the court that in order not to stall the trial, he would not object the EFCC calling the second witness.

    The 2nd prosecution witness (PW-2), who identified herself as Williams Abimbola, a compliance officer with the United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc, confirmed that a subpoenaed letter was received by her office.

    She told the court that the subpoena was with her.

    When Pinheiro sought to tender the letter of subpoena, Daudu did not oppose the application and Justice Nwite marked it as “Exhibit 1.”

    The witness read out parts of the documents the subpoena requested from the bank which include the statements of account of Kogi State Government House, from Jan. 1, 2016 to Jan. 31, 2024.

    This also included the statements of account of Maselina Njoku, from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2022.

    The documents were admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits by the court, including the account opening packages of American International School and the school’s statements of accounts, from Sept. 1 to Sept. 30, 2020.

    Justice Nwite adjourned the matter until March 6 and March 7 for continuation of trial.

    NAN

  • VIDEO: Jubilation as ex-Gov Bello returns home from prison

    VIDEO: Jubilation as ex-Gov Bello returns home from prison

    Former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello has returned home after fulfilling his bail conditions and being released from the Kuje Minimum Custodial Centre in Abuja.

    TheNewsGuru.com (TNG) reports ex-Governor Bello was received and welcomed by the incumbent Governor of Kogi State Ahmed Usman Ododo and his jubilant supporters.

    Recall that a Federal Capital Territory High Court on Thursday, had admitted Bello to bail in the sum of N500 million with three sureties in like sum.

    Justice Maryann Anenih had, on Dec. 10, refused the ex-governor’s bail application, saying it was filed prematurely.

    Delivering the initial ruling, she said, having been filed when Bello was neither in custody nor before the court, the application was incompetent.

    There was, however room for the governor’s lawyers to file a fresh application for bail and apply for hearing date.

    The former governor is facing an alleged money laundering trial to the tune of N110bn, along with two others.

    He had pleaded not guilty to the 16-count charges brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    At the resumed hearing on Thursday , Counsel for the former governor, Joseph Daudu, SAN, informed the court that the defence counsel had filed a further affidavit in response to the counter affidavit filed and served by the prosecution counsel.

    He applied to withdraw the further affidavit, saying, “We do not want to make the matter contentious.”

    There was no objection from the prosecution counsel, Olukayode Enitan, SAN. The court, therefore, granted the application for withdrawal, striking out the further affidavit.

    Daudu, also informed the court that discussions had taken place with the leader of the prosecution counsels, resulting in an agreement to ensure a speedy trial.

    In light of this understanding, Daudu urged the court to grant the bail application.

    He further requested that if the court would graciously grant the Defendant bail, the court should kindly review the bail conditions for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants.

    He urged the court to broaden the scope of properties to be used as bail sureties to include locations across the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), rather than limiting the location solely to Maitama.

    The prosecution counsel, Enitan SAN, acknowledged that Daudu SAN had been in talks with the prosecution team.

    In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), the EFCC Counsel gave assurance of their cooperation in expediting the trial.

    He said, “I confirm the evidence given by the distinguished member of the bar that is leading the Defence, J.B. Daudu, SAN, that he has been in conversation with the leader of the prosecuting team.

    “It is legal tradition that we should cooperate with members of the bar when it does not affect the course of justice.

    ”We have decided not to make this contentious, bearing in mind that no matter how industrious the defence counsel might be in pushing forward the application for bail and no matter how vociferous the prosecution counsel can argue against the bail application, your lordship is bound by your discretion to grant or not to grant the application.

    “We are therefore leaving this to your lordship’s discretion.”

    Delivering her ruling, Justice Anenih acknowledged that the offence Bello was charged with was a bailable one and granted the ex-governor bail in the sum of N500 million, with three sureties in like sum.

    The sureties must be notable Nigerians with landed property in Maitama, Jabi, Utako, Apo, Guzape, Garki and Asokoro.

    Bello was also asked to deposit his international passport and other travel documents with the court.

    He is to remain in Kuje Correctional Centre until the bail conditions are met.

    Daudu also prayed for the variation of the 2nd defendant ‘ bail condition.

    Z.E Abbas, counsel for the third defendant filed a motion on Dec. 17 for variation of bail conditions and urged the court to grant the application.

    This variation is based on landed property which earlier restricted them to only Maitama.

    The prosecution did not object.

    The judge granted their prayers and granted the property location as Yahaya Bello ‘s.

    The second and the third defendants were earlier admitted to bail in the sum of N300m each with two surgeries in.like sum with property at Maitama.

    The case was adjourned until Jan. 29.

  • Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello tenders apology, granted N500m bail

    Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello tenders apology, granted N500m bail

    Former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello has apologized to Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Maitama, Abuja, for failing to appear in court for his trial, and admitted to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum.

    Bello, through his counsel, J.B. Daudu SAN, expressed regret for any perceived disrespect toward the court, saying: “My lord, I am apologizing on behalf of the defendant for any perceived disrespect toward the court in the past”.

    Addressing the court, the defence counsel  clarified that the defendant’s earlier actions were not intended as contempt.

    “For the record, my lord, I wish to apologize for any impression that the defendant refused to appear before your Lordship. He directed his former counsel to challenge the court’s jurisdiction, which led the matter up to the Supreme Court. This was not an act of disrespect but a procedural move,” he said

    Continuing, he stressed that,  “The defendant, a two-term governor of Kogi State, holds the court in the highest regard. I assure this honourable court that he will appear for trial on all adjourned dates, barring sickness or death.”

    Bello is facing a 19-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering, contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended).

    One of the charges read: “That you, Yahaya Adoza Bello, Ali Bello, Dauda Suleiman, and Abdulsalam Hudu (still at large), sometime in February 2016 in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired amongst yourselves to convert the total sum of ₦80,246,470,089.88 (Eighty Billion, Two Hundred and Forty-Six Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Thousand and Eighty-Nine Naira, Eighty-Eight Kobo), which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity to wit: criminal breach of trust, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011, as amended.”

    Other charges include alleged fraudulent transactions involving billions of naira and foreign currency, carried out between 2016 and 2023 through various companies. Bello pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    Daudu sought bail for his client, applauding the understanding  of the prosecution. “I must express profound respect for my learned silk for the prosecution, Dr. Kemi Pinheiro SAN. He shared a soft copy of the counter-affidavit before today’s proceedings, and we agreed to avoid unnecessary arguments. We urge the court to grant bail on reasonable terms and conditions,” he said.

    Responding, Pinheiro praised the defence counsel’s professionalism. “I must acknowledge the integrity of J.B. Daudu SAN. We have worked to streamline the proceedings and reduce the burden on your Lordship. The EFCC is a professional, not a persecutorial body. However, the decision to grant bail and its conditions are entirely at the court’s discretion,”he said.

    Pinheiro also noted the defendant’s apology, adding, “Let it be on record that the defendant has apologized through his counsel.”

    Justice Nwite, while delivering his ruling, emphasized his independence. “Neither party will guide me on what to do. However, given the assurances by J.B. Daudu SAN, I am inclined to grant bail. But for  these assurances, my ruling might have been otherwise,” the judge stated.

    The court granted  Bello bail in the sum of ₦500 million, with two sureties in like sum. The sureties must own properties within the court’s jurisdiction. Bello is also required to deposit his international passport with the Deputy Chief Registrar of the court, submit recent passport photographs, and swear an affidavit of means.

    Until the bail conditions are met, Justice Nwite ordered that Bello be remanded at the Nigerian Correctional Centre, Kuje and adjourned the trial to February 24 and 28, as well as March 6 and 7, 2025, for continuation of trial.

    Court admits ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello to N500m bail

    A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, admitted the immediate-past Governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum.

    Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling, ordered that the two sureties must be landed property owners within the jurisdiction the court. Justice Nwite ordered that the sureties must sworn to affidavit of means which must be verified by the court registrar.

    The judge, who ordered the former governor to submit his international passport to the court, directed the sureties to equally submit two copies of their passport photographs each. He ordered the defendant to be remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre pending the perfection of his bail. Justice Nwite subsequently adjourned the matter until Feb. 24, Feb. 28, March 6 and March 7, 2025 for trial.

    Bello pleaded not guilty to the 19-count charge brought against him by the EFCC. The ex-governor is facing an alleged money laundering trial to the tune of N80 billion.

    When the case was called for hearing, on Friday, counsel for the EFCC, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, notified the court of the intention of the prosecution to withdraw an earlier application for abridgment of the earlier date fixed for arraignment. He said the application had been overtaken by events.

    The lawyer to the former governor, Joseph Daudu, SAN, did not object and Justice Nwite, accordingly granted the request. After the defendant had taken his plea, Daudu made clarifications on the reasons he had not been in court during the previous hearings.

    “I would like to place on record that for any impression that might have been created that the defendant did not wish to appear before your lordship. Coincidentally, the ruling on my lord’s sitting this morning dealt with the issue of jurisdiction.

    “What the defendant did was to ask his counsel to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, which got to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. So it was not a wishful disrespect but he was only trying to defend himself.

    “So we all hold your lordship in high esteem. If that impression must have been, he would not have presented himself for arraignment. That episode is gone and things are clearer now,” he said.

    While moving an application for bail, Daudu assured that the former governor would always be present in court for the trial.

    “I am saying this with the highest sense of responsibility that the defendant, a two-term governor of Kogi State, who travelled only two times out of his eight years in service, will always be present in court at all times.

    “There should be no apprehension that he will jump bail. So we urge your lordship to grant us very reasonable conditions of bail such that he will be able to bear,” he added.

    He commended the prosecution counsel, saying he had conducted himself on the best tradition because the matter was not a do-or-die one.

    He said they had agreed that the counsel would not stress the court over the issue of bail. The Prosecution Counsel concurred. Responding, Pinheiro also thanked Daudu for his assurance.

    He confirmed that both lawyers had had discussion on the issue of bail for the defendant.

    “I must express my honour to the very eminent lead senior counsel. He is a man of immense stature, not because of his size.

    “I do respect him as president of NBA. I also confirm that we have been engaging in series of discussions to ease the burden on your lordship in compliance with Rule 26 of Rules of Professional Ethics.

    “I also note that your lordship had delivered not less than five rulings in this matter and it is our aim to ease the work.

    “We are prosecutors not persecutors. So EFCC is a professional commission; a prosecutorial and not persecutorial commission,” he said.

    “We accept the assurances of the very eminent SAN that the defendant will make himself available subject to your lordship’s discretionary terms that may be imposed.

    “By so doing, we will ease the burden on the court. Therefore, we will not be opposing the eminent SAN’s submission,” he said.

    Pinheiro said though they had filed a counter-affidavit, they would not oppose the bail, going by the assurances of Daudu.

    Ruling on the bail application, Justice Nwite said, “I have listened to the submissions of both counsels. It is not in dispute that both counsels have filed applications in respect of the bail application.”

    He said the right of the defendant and the prosecution must be taken into account in granting bail.

    The judge held that having not opposed the bail plea, he was minded to change his earlier stand on the matter.

    The ex-governor was earlier, on Tuesday, remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre by an High Court in Abuja on a fresh N110 billion charge by EFCC, pending his bail application.